RE: Exchange changing DC
Yes, your analysis makes sense. Exchange should only use DCs in its local AD site. Do you have sites set up and configured in AD? I'm guessing not, without any further information... Exchange should log about once every 20-30 minutes a 2080 event log entry that tells you the in-site and out-site DCs it sees. Post us the contents of a recent one of those. It would help answer your question. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 2:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange changing DC Exchange 2007 Just had a brief outage that Exchange recovered from on its own. From Event Viewer: 1022 from MSExchange Mailbox Sore with a failed logon. We got three of these 9662 from MEExchangeIS There was an error obtaining the Unsolicited Commercial Email default filter level from the directory. The error code was 0x80040401. The value remains at 8. 9002 from MSExchange Assistants Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Stopped processing database Storage Group 1/Mail Database 1 (12ffb86a-4842-420c-8c15-b43b86acdbbc). We got one of these for each Storage Group. 1022 MSExchange ActiveSync The connection between the Client Access server and Mailbox server CORP-EXCHANGE.wrightbg.com failed. By now email is piling up in queues. Users are telephoning that Outlook can't reach the Exchange server. 2095 ExchangeADAccess Process STORE.EXE (PID=3652). The Configuration Domain Controller has been changed from cal-dc03.wrightbg.com to CORP-DC03A.wrightbg.com. Now good things happen: 9661 MSExchangeIS The Unsolicited Commercial Email default filter level has been updated. The new value is 8. 9001 from MSExchange Assistants Service MSExchangeMailSubmission. Started to process mailbox database Storage Group 1/Mail Database 1 (12ffb86a-4842-420c-8c15-b43b86acdbbc). (One for each storage group Email is working normally again. The total timeline was about 5 minutes. The original DC involved was in another physical location connected by a T1. The domain controller it's now pulling from is local. We've got bandwidth issues here in general and I suspect that the Exchange server couldn't contact the remote DC, so it after a delay, it switched to the local DC. Questions: Does this analysis make sense? We have two local DCs. How can I force Exchange to only use these, to avoid this problem in the future? Thanks in advance, Steve --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Exchange changing DC
Exchange 2007 Just had a brief outage that Exchange recovered from on its own. From Event Viewer: 1022 from MSExchange Mailbox Sore with a failed logon. We got three of these 9662 from MEExchangeIS There was an error obtaining the Unsolicited Commercial Email default filter level from the directory. The error code was 0x80040401. The value remains at 8. 9002 from MSExchange Assistants Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Stopped processing database Storage Group 1/Mail Database 1 (12ffb86a-4842-420c-8c15-b43b86acdbbc). We got one of these for each Storage Group. 1022 MSExchange ActiveSync The connection between the Client Access server and Mailbox server CORP-EXCHANGE.wrightbg.com failed. By now email is piling up in queues. Users are telephoning that Outlook can't reach the Exchange server. 2095 ExchangeADAccess Process STORE.EXE (PID=3652). The Configuration Domain Controller has been changed from cal-dc03.wrightbg.com to CORP-DC03A.wrightbg.com. Now good things happen: 9661 MSExchangeIS The Unsolicited Commercial Email default filter level has been updated. The new value is 8. 9001 from MSExchange Assistants Service MSExchangeMailSubmission. Started to process mailbox database Storage Group 1/Mail Database 1 (12ffb86a-4842-420c-8c15-b43b86acdbbc). (One for each storage group Email is working normally again. The total timeline was about 5 minutes. The original DC involved was in another physical location connected by a T1. The domain controller it's now pulling from is local. We've got bandwidth issues here in general and I suspect that the Exchange server couldn't contact the remote DC, so it after a delay, it switched to the local DC. Questions: Does this analysis make sense? We have two local DCs. How can I force Exchange to only use these, to avoid this problem in the future? Thanks in advance, Steve --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Exchange changing DC
Was the DC on the end of the slow link in the same AD site? From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 2:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange changing DC Exchange 2007 Just had a brief outage that Exchange recovered from on its own. From Event Viewer: 1022 from MSExchange Mailbox Sore with a failed logon. We got three of these 9662 from MEExchangeIS There was an error obtaining the Unsolicited Commercial Email default filter level from the directory. The error code was 0x80040401. The value remains at 8. 9002 from MSExchange Assistants Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Stopped processing database Storage Group 1/Mail Database 1 (12ffb86a-4842-420c-8c15-b43b86acdbbc). We got one of these for each Storage Group. 1022 MSExchange ActiveSync The connection between the Client Access server and Mailbox server CORP-EXCHANGE.wrightbg.com failed. By now email is piling up in queues. Users are telephoning that Outlook can't reach the Exchange server. 2095 ExchangeADAccess Process STORE.EXE (PID=3652). The Configuration Domain Controller has been changed from cal-dc03.wrightbg.com to CORP-DC03A.wrightbg.com. Now good things happen: 9661 MSExchangeIS The Unsolicited Commercial Email default filter level has been updated. The new value is 8. 9001 from MSExchange Assistants Service MSExchangeMailSubmission. Started to process mailbox database Storage Group 1/Mail Database 1 (12ffb86a-4842-420c-8c15-b43b86acdbbc). (One for each storage group Email is working normally again. The total timeline was about 5 minutes. The original DC involved was in another physical location connected by a T1. The domain controller it's now pulling from is local. We've got bandwidth issues here in general and I suspect that the Exchange server couldn't contact the remote DC, so it after a delay, it switched to the local DC. Questions: Does this analysis make sense? We have two local DCs. How can I force Exchange to only use these, to avoid this problem in the future? Thanks in advance, Steve --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Exchange changing DC
Had a similar thing happen at client where exchange 2003 server decided on a remote DC and that connection went flaky. look here for exchange 2007: http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2006/10/20/3395119.aspx Steve Hart wrote: Exchange 2007 Just had a brief outage that Exchange recovered from on its own. From Event Viewer: 1022 from MSExchange Mailbox Sore with a failed logon. We got three of these 9662 from MEExchangeIS “There was an error obtaining the Unsolicited Commercial Email default filter level from the directory. The error code was 0x80040401. The value remains at 8.” 9002 from MSExchange Assistants “Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Stopped processing database Storage Group 1/Mail Database 1 (12ffb86a-4842-420c-8c15-b43b86acdbbc).” We got one of these for each Storage Group. 1022 MSExchange ActiveSync “The connection between the Client Access server and Mailbox server CORP-EXCHANGE.wrightbg.com failed.” By now email is piling up in queues. Users are telephoning that Outlook can’t reach the Exchange server. 2095 ExchangeADAccess “Process STORE.EXE (PID=3652). The Configuration Domain Controller has been changed from cal-dc03.wrightbg.com to CORP-DC03A.wrightbg.com.” Now good things happen: 9661 MSExchangeIS “The Unsolicited Commercial Email default filter level has been updated. The new value is 8.” 9001 from MSExchange Assistants “Service MSExchangeMailSubmission. Started to process mailbox database Storage Group 1/Mail Database 1 (12ffb86a-4842-420c-8c15-b43b86acdbbc). (One for each storage group” Email is working normally again. The total timeline was about 5 minutes. The original DC involved was in another physical location connected by a T1. The domain controller it’s now pulling from is local. We’ve got bandwidth issues here in general and I suspect that the Exchange server couldn’t contact the remote DC, so it after a delay, it switched to the local DC. Questions: Does this analysis make sense? We have two local DCs. How can I force Exchange to only use these, to avoid this problem in the future? Thanks in advance, Steve --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message Special Boat Squadron ;-) http://home3.inet.tele.dk/jdj/spec_ops/count/uk_sbs.htm In the MS world, it probably means Small Business Server Phil -Phil RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 03 July 2002 19:26To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? I think I'm allowed one stupid question a year.. What does SBS stand for? -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Check out the thread on the NTSYSadmin list about SBS2K... You'll see that DR procedures aren't all they're cracked up to be. SBS is shite and any reasonable professional would echo these same sentiments. SBS has it's place, particularly nowhere near any network I work on! -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? yes I have, its very goodas far as changing hardware, all w2k has that problem Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Are you reading the marketing? Have you ever tried to switch hardware for it? Or even upgrade from previous versions? Or perform disaster revocery when it bombed? It's a good idea, poorly implemented, in my opinion. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? thats stupid, its very cost effective and great for smb's Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Yeah Well, most of us don't recommend SBS on anything... -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message thats stupid, its very cost effective and great for smb's Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Yeah Well, most of us don't recommend SBS on anything... -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message Are you reading the marketing? Have you ever tried to switch hardware for it? Or even upgrade from previous versions? Or perform disaster revocery when it bombed? It's a good idea, poorly implemented, in my opinion. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? thats stupid, its very cost effective and great for smb's Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Yeah Well, most of us don't recommend SBS on anything... -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message yes I have, its very goodas far as changing hardware, all w2k has that problem Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Are you reading the marketing? Have you ever tried to switch hardware for it? Or even upgrade from previous versions? Or perform disaster revocery when it bombed? It's a good idea, poorly implemented, in my opinion. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? thats stupid, its very cost effective and great for smb's Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Yeah Well, most of us don't recommend SBS on anything... -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message Check out the thread on the NTSYSadmin list about SBS2K... You'll see that DR procedures aren't all they're cracked up to be. SBS is shite and any reasonable professional would echo these same sentiments. SBS has it's place, particularly nowhere near any network I work on! -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? yes I have, its very goodas far as changing hardware, all w2k has that problem Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Are you reading the marketing? Have you ever tried to switch hardware for it? Or even upgrade from previous versions? Or perform disaster revocery when it bombed? It's a good idea, poorly implemented, in my opinion. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? thats stupid, its very cost effective and great for smb's Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Yeah Well, most of us don't recommend SBS on anything... -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message I think I'm allowed one stupid question a year.. What does SBS stand for? -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Check out the thread on the NTSYSadmin list about SBS2K... You'll see that DR procedures aren't all they're cracked up to be. SBS is shite and any reasonable professional would echo these same sentiments. SBS has it's place, particularly nowhere near any network I work on! -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? yes I have, its very goodas far as changing hardware, all w2k has that problem Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Are you reading the marketing? Have you ever tried to switch hardware for it? Or even upgrade from previous versions? Or perform disaster revocery when it bombed? It's a good idea, poorly implemented, in my opinion. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? thats stupid, its very cost effective and great for smb's Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Yeah Well, most of us don't recommend SBS on anything... -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday,
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message Small Biz Server -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 2:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? I think I'm allowed one stupid question a year.. What does SBS stand for? -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Check out the thread on the NTSYSadmin list about SBS2K... You'll see that DR procedures aren't all they're cracked up to be. SBS is shite and any reasonable professional would echo these same sentiments. SBS has it's place, particularly nowhere near any network I work on! -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? yes I have, its very goodas far as changing hardware, all w2k has that problem Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Are you reading the marketing? Have you ever tried to switch hardware for it? Or even upgrade from previous versions? Or perform disaster revocery when it bombed? It's a good idea, poorly implemented, in my opinion. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? thats stupid, its very cost effective and great for smb's Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Yeah Well, most of us don't recommend SBS on anything... -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality.
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message Small Business Server. Microsoft's bundle of NT Server (now W2K), Exchange, SQL Server, Proxy Server (now ISA), etc. Saves $$ on SW, but headaches come with it. Last one I did, they were probably too big for it in terms of # users (not over the 50-user limit), and we had hassles with file printer access rights for users created in their funky front-end. Anyone have other horror stories on SBS? Is the new SBS2K version better? Bob Peitzke -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? I think I'm allowed one stupid question a year.. What does SBS stand for? -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Check out the thread on the NTSYSadmin list about SBS2K... You'll see that DR procedures aren't all they're cracked up to be. SBS is shite and any reasonable professional would echo these same sentiments. SBS has it's place, particularly nowhere near any network I work on! -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? yes I have, its very goodas far as changing hardware, all w2k has that problem Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Are you reading the marketing? Have you ever tried to switch hardware for it? Or even upgrade from previous versions? Or perform disaster revocery when it bombed? It's a good idea, poorly implemented, in my opinion. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? thats stupid, its very cost effective and great for smb's Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Yeah Well, most of us don't recommend SBS on anything... -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of w
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message http://www.microsoft.com/sbs -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? I think I'm allowed one stupid question a year.. What does SBS stand for? -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Check out the thread on the NTSYSadmin list about SBS2K... You'll see that DR procedures aren't all they're cracked up to be. SBS is shite and any reasonable professional would echo these same sentiments. SBS has it's place, particularly nowhere near any network I work on! -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? yes I have, its very goodas far as changing hardware, all w2k has that problem Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Are you reading the marketing? Have you ever tried to switch hardware for it? Or even upgrade from previous versions? Or perform disaster revocery when it bombed? It's a good idea, poorly implemented, in my opinion. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? thats stupid, its very cost effective and great for smb's Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Yeah Well, most of us don't recommend SBS on anything... -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message Yeah Well, most of us don't recommend SBS on anything... -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message On good hardware, what are50 users going to do? SBS leaves a lot to be desired. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
I have an Exchange2000 server that's been running on a DC/GC through beta3, RC1, RC2 and RTM. No problems. No unusual funkiness. The documentation strongly recommends against installing it on a DC. Though, I'm sure they hate it when customers pull crap like that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange on DC? On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, at 1:49pm, Herchenbach, Jim wrote: I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? It will install. It will even work, sort of. But, from practical experience, I can tell you that it does not work well. We did this with one of our small customers in a single-server environment. We figured, Hey, if Small Business Server does it, why can't we? Well, all sorts of funky things happened. Confusing message dialogs, lots of errors in the Event Log, etc. Spent a lot of time in the MS PSS Knowledge Base. We even called PSS on a few issues. They all resolved to, You can ignore that; Exchange will sometimes generate that error in a single-server environment. Basically, Microsoft told us Exchange is not designed to run on an Domain Controller. Not in so many words, but that is what it amounted to. I got the distinct impression that the only reason it is supported at all is that otherwise, they would not be able to sell Small Business Server, and Microsoft management will not allow that. I hate it when companies pull crap like that. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, | entity or | organization. All information is provided without | warranty of any kind. | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange on DC?
Title: Message I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message Can be.. But I hear horror stories -Original Message- From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message- From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like ill go for it. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000 and Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000 both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cash List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message It _can_ be .. But it's not recommended :- - Performance will suffer - Taking "one down" will probably take both down (ie you apply an Exchange hotfix/service-pack and reboot .. you loose your DC) Thanks Rob -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 June 2002 19:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message What about small test networks ? Like your home dev area? -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 14:47To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? Can be.. But I hear horror stories -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cash List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
This depends on the size of your org and the amount of traffic generated. Say a 50 user org - with a nice juicy box (at least a dual p-4 with 4 gigs of ram) sure you could run e2k on a dc, and even get away with running owa on it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 2:50 PM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Exchange on DC? Can be. But I hear horror stories -Original Message- From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message- From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like ill go for it. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000 and Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000 both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cash List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm File item 2 original document name: Not specified File item 2 document type: UNKNOWN File item 2 size (bytes): 12596 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Exchange on DC?
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, at 1:49pm, Herchenbach, Jim wrote: I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? It will install. It will even work, sort of. But, from practical experience, I can tell you that it does not work well. We did this with one of our small customers in a single-server environment. We figured, Hey, if Small Business Server does it, why can't we? Well, all sorts of funky things happened. Confusing message dialogs, lots of errors in the Event Log, etc. Spent a lot of time in the MS PSS Knowledge Base. We even called PSS on a few issues. They all resolved to, You can ignore that; Exchange will sometimes generate that error in a single-server environment. Basically, Microsoft told us Exchange is not designed to run on an Domain Controller. Not in so many words, but that is what it amounted to. I got the distinct impression that the only reason it is supported at all is that otherwise, they would not be able to sell Small Business Server, and Microsoft management will not allow that. I hate it when companies pull crap like that. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange 2000 (DC used by Services)
Does anyone know how to change the Domain Controlloer used by the exchange services to point to a different one. My Exchange 2k server is pointed to DC-02 and I want to decommision that server. But if I uninstall AD on the server Exchange no longer works. I want to point exchange to DC-01. Exchange2k SP1 Standard Edition Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County School of the Arts List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 2000 (DC used by Services)
I've been looking for that, too. I'm writing my own instructions now, but untested. This might do it: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q295/4/19.ASP William -Original Message- From: Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2000 (DC used by Services) Does anyone know how to change the Domain Controlloer used by the exchange services to point to a different one. My Exchange 2k server is pointed to DC-02 and I want to decommision that server. But if I uninstall AD on the server Exchange no longer works. I want to point exchange to DC-01. Exchange2k SP1 Standard Edition Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County School of the Arts List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
