RE: MAPI over T1
I did something similar for a remote office at a former employer. At the time it was an Exchange 5.5 solution. The main thing was limiting the size of the attachments. Second most important was teaching users how to move messages to subfolders, either by rule or manually. Outlook comes up a lot quicker when it has to enumerate only 50-100 headers instead of 2000. We also implemented Trend's ScanMail product and blocked all non work-related attachments. Granted, users could still zip up a .mpg file and send it..but once we got wind of it, we reminded users to cut it out. All users were encouraged to zip large documents and send them, particularly if it were to a colleague. Exchange 2000 Enterprise really simplifies things for remote offices if you set the permissions and limits for Storage Groups and Mail Stores. Fortunately you also have a more robust OWA tool available. Something else you may want to consider is a Citrix or Terminal Services solution. Those users would TS to a server @ the home office. All of your servers would be located at that site, thus limiting file transfers over the VPN and limiting messaging traffic. It would keep the workstations thin and make them easy to administer. However, thin clients, IM(NS)HO, are too darned expensive for the little box and Windows CE. Another benefit is not having to run backups over those VPN links. Cisco makes a lot of good solutions for remote offices, including VPN and IP telephony. This solution, along with properly secured network infrastructure, SSL security, TS Web Access, and a properly configured server would allow people to work from home. Granted, there are all those HR and FLSA laws that you have to check with HR before even considering opening it up to the DMZ. These are my opinions and experiences and in no way reflect endorsement, approval, or responsibility for and/or of my comments by my employer. Regards, Bob Bobby J. Christian II NT Systems Engineer VeriSign, Inc. Savannah, GA Carrier Division 912.527.4396 -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks Bobby J. Christian II NT Systems Engineer VeriSign, Inc. Savannah, GA Carrier Division 912.527.4396 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
They are JPG!!! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 I connect from home at 19,200 MAPI no problem, except when Blackstone embeds bmp's of his cute dog in the message body. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 I've seen designs that allow for 5-6k bandwidth per MAPI session over a WAN link (obviously a bit more during the logon sequence, etc). Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 07 March 2002 01:56 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: MAPI over T1 Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
I connect from home at 19,200 MAPI no problem, except when Blackstone embeds bmp's of his cute dog in the message body. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 I've seen designs that allow for 5-6k bandwidth per MAPI session over a WAN link (obviously a bit more during the logon sequence, etc). Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 07 March 2002 01:56 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: MAPI over T1 Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message Yea, I must have to much time on my hands. I have my own personal copy of exchange 2k at home. Legal too… My isp (Telus) are a bunch of incompetent idiots, and I have on regular occasion a 2 hour dyn IP lease. I have etrn setup at my clients, and and have them set up as lower MX pri, with my dynDNS name set up as the main MX… It works flawlessly for a year now… hehehe I luv running OL in Corp mode at home… Cool… jlc -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Hey now, some of us are still antiquated -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Not that I know. You don't like OWA? I kinda really like it now... Hell, 'member the 5.5 days, now that sucked. Its come a long ways... jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Yah Im not sure either, is there any other way to populate the users global address book and public folders without using MAPI or webmail (ugh!). -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Ben, let us know how this works anyway. Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message Hey now, some of us are still antiquated -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Not that I know. You don't like OWA? I kinda really like it now... Hell, 'member the 5.5 days, now that sucked. Its come a long ways... jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Yah Im not sure either, is there any other way to populate the users global address book and public folders without using MAPI or webmail (ugh!). -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Ben, let us know how this works anyway. Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message We have 2 offices downtown Chicago, connected via a point-to-point T1, they also share our dual T1's to the 'net. At our peak employment time, we had close to 100 users sharing this T1 and only really had connection issues in the morning, when everyone came in, and around lunch time with people browsing the 'net and email. At times, it would put a strain on the T1, but that was usually when someone was transferring mp3's or other large files. MZ -Original Message-From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MAPI over T1 Ben, let us know how this works anyway.Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message You should be fine, this is exactly the way I have our 3 remote offices set up - T1's w/VPN tunnel to our corporate Exchange server, with about 15-20 users in each remote office. The only exception is our UK office, which has its own Exchange server, but this was more of a business decision than a logistical one. The only complaint I get occurs when someone in one of the remote offices gets a large attachment in their Inbox (several MB worth)...although with enough patience they will eventually open. Almost inevitably it is an MP3, or MPEG that one of their co-workers has sent them. This a very good way to get users in the habit of sending links, instead of attachments - I should send all my (l)users to the remote offices for a few months each year. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ***The information transmitted in this email is intended only forthe person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and maycontain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking ofany action in reliance upon, this information by persons orentities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.If you received this email in error, please contact thesender and permanently delete the email from any computer.
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message I'm not sure...I could probably get used to it if I had to. With SP2 (Exch) and IE6, it looks a LOT like the regular Outlook client. SP2 was supposed to include new message notifications as well, but I didn't get that to work. Coulda been the way I was using it though. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Oh yah its MUCH better, and with integrated authentication over the vpn it probably wouldnt be too bad, but to use it all day every day for work must be kind of annoying.. -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Not that I know. You don't like OWA? I kinda really like it now... Hell, 'member the 5.5 days, now that sucked. Its come a long ways... jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Yah Im not sure either, is there any other way to populate the users global address book and public folders without using MAPI or webmail (ugh!). -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Ben, let us know how this works anyway. Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message Yup. I think you are fine as well. We have many offices with 256K to 384K circuits that access mail via MAPI in a different office. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 I'm sure it will be fine. I was at a company with 8 remote offices of 50 to 100 people. Each had a 256K connection to the home office where the Exch servers were. It was a little slow, but it worked just fine. I would agree. Dont put a server in each locale. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
I've seen designs that allow for 5-6k bandwidth per MAPI session over a WAN link (obviously a bit more during the logon sequence, etc). Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 07 March 2002 01:56 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: MAPI over T1 Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message Oh yah its MUCH better, and with integrated authentication over the vpn it probably wouldnt be too bad, but to use it all day every day for work must be kind of annoying.. -Original Message-From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MAPI over T1 Not that I know. You don’t like OWA? I kinda really like it now…Hell, ‘member the 5.5 days, now that sucked. Its come a long ways… jlc -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MAPI over T1 Yah Im not sure either, is there any other way to populate the users global address book and public folders without using MAPI or webmail (ugh!). -Original Message-From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MAPI over T1 Ben, let us know how this works anyway.Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message I'm sure it will be fine. I was at a company with 8 remote offices of 50 to 100 people. Each had a 256K connection to the home office where the Exch servers were. It was a little slow, but it worked just fine. I would agree. Dont put a server in each locale. -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. ThanksList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message Not that I know. You don’t like OWA? I kinda really like it now… Hell, ‘member the 5.5 days, now that sucked. Its come a long ways… jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Yah Im not sure either, is there any other way to populate the users global address book and public folders without using MAPI or webmail (ugh!). -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Ben, let us know how this works anyway. Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message Yah Im not sure either, is there any other way to populate the users global address book and public folders without using MAPI or webmail (ugh!). -Original Message-From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MAPI over T1 Ben, let us know how this works anyway.Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message Ben, let us know how this works anyway. Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
MAPI over T1
Title: Message I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
