RE: SMTP Authentication
Title: Message If you setup denying relay but allow authenticated users, you should be fine with POP just remember if they sucked their email out of the server you do not have it anymore. Eugene Pesochin Systems Manager ClubMom, Inc. 200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl New York, New York 10016 tel 646.435.6565 fax 646.435.6600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.clubmom.com -Original Message- From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Authentication not a Clear Channel issue - just our little division - they even have stranger rules but I am not going to go there. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are going to have a new love affair. -Original Message- From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Authentication Bummer. Well I think Clear Channel has a couple of stations up here in Anchorage. I could round up some people that are listeners and call the powers that be and voice our disapproval of their suggested configuration for remote access to corporate email. If you think that would help. ;o) Wish I could be of more help. Good luck. Regards, Sean Martin, MCSE Network Administrator Ribelin Lowell Company Insurance Brokers, Inc. 3111 C Street, Suite 300 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Ph: (907) 561-1250 Fax: (907) 561-4315 Cell: (907) 229-0885 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Authentication Outlook can automatically check pop accounts at intervals - say 5 minutes. Offices are part of the organization and I have requested either to put them on the WAN or to allowVPN which we have availablebut higher ups want it this way. I even suggested leaving them on the old server which is a pop server and just set up CR's for them to get them on the GAL but got shot down on that. I don't like doing it this way personally but Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Let a fool hold his tongue and he will pass for a sage. -Original Message- From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Authentication Well correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're implementing POP, won't the users have to click something to send/receive their messages, even from Outlook? Are these remote offices part of your organization? Is setting up a VPN between eachoffice an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSE Network Administrator Ribelin Lowell Company Insurance Brokers, Inc. 3111 C Street, Suite 300 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Ph: (907) 561-1250 Fax: (907) 561-4315 Cell: (907) 229-0885 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Authentication Users. They like Outlook - they like the automatic checking for new messages without having to (horrors) click something. These people are sales people based in remote offices and not the most accepting of learning ANYTHING new. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The only way to amuse some people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement. -Original Message- From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Authentication I forget..why isn't OWA an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSE Network Administrator Ribelin Lowell Company Insurance Brokers, Inc. 3111 C Street, Suite 300 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Ph: (907) 561-1250 Fax: (907) 561-4315 Cell: (907) 229-0885 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Authentication Hello Could not find anything on the Archives on this so hopefully one of you will have dealt with it Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT 4.0 sp6a Sent a question about POP a few days ago and am
RE: SMTP Authentication
Title: SMTP Authentication I forget..why isn't OWA an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: SMTP Authentication Hello Could not find anything on the Archives on this so hopefully one of you will have dealt with it Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT 4.0 sp6a Sent a question about POP a few days ago and am in the process of implementing it. My boss has talked to MS PSS just to be sure and he is telling me we are going to need to use a different SMTP server for them to send against. I thought using the setting in the POP connector for Exchange to relay for authenticated users in conjunction with having the Outlook client be set to "My Server requires Authentication" should allow them to send. These guys will be using various methods of accessing the internet from DSL to dialup so I cannot set IP settings for it. I have not implemented this yet but my tests from home using my cable modem seem ok. Any one have any insights? TIA Jim Why isn't the word "phonetically" spelled with an "f"? -- Steven Wright List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the communication in error.
RE: SMTP Authentication
Title: Message Users. They like Outlook - they like the automatic checking for new messages without having to (horrors) click something. These people are sales people based in remote offices and not the most accepting of learning ANYTHING new. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The only way to amuse some people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement. -Original Message-From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication I forget..why isn't OWA an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: SMTP Authentication Hello Could not find anything on the Archives on this so hopefully one of you will have dealt with it Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT 4.0 sp6a Sent a question about POP a few days ago and am in the process of implementing it. My boss has talked to MS PSS just to be sure and he is telling me we are going to need to use a different SMTP server for them to send against. I thought using the setting in the POP connector for Exchange to relay for authenticated users in conjunction with having the Outlook client be set to "My Server requires Authentication" should allow them to send. These guys will be using various methods of accessing the internet from DSL to dialup so I cannot set IP settings for it. I have not implemented this yet but my tests from home using my cable modem seem ok. Any one have any insights? TIA Jim Why isn't the word "phonetically" spelled with an "f"? -- Steven Wright List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the communication in error. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SMTP Authentication
Title: Message Well correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're implementing POP, won't the users have to click something to send/receive their messages, even from Outlook? Are these remote offices part of your organization? Is setting up a VPN between eachoffice an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication Users. They like Outlook - they like the automatic checking for new messages without having to (horrors) click something. These people are sales people based in remote offices and not the most accepting of learning ANYTHING new. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The only way to amuse some people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement. -Original Message-From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication I forget..why isn't OWA an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: SMTP Authentication Hello Could not find anything on the Archives on this so hopefully one of you will have dealt with it Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT 4.0 sp6a Sent a question about POP a few days ago and am in the process of implementing it. My boss has talked to MS PSS just to be sure and he is telling me we are going to need to use a different SMTP server for them to send against. I thought using the setting in the POP connector for Exchange to relay for authenticated users in conjunction with having the Outlook client be set to "My Server requires Authentication" should allow them to send. These guys will be using various methods of accessing the internet from DSL to dialup so I cannot set IP settings for it. I have not implemented this yet but my tests from home using my cable modem seem ok. Any one have any insights? TIA Jim Why isn't the word "phonetically" spelled with an "f"? -- Steven Wright List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the communication in error.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the communication in error.
RE: SMTP Authentication
Title: Message Outlook can automatically check pop accounts at intervals - say 5 minutes. Offices are part of the organization and I have requested either to put them on the WAN or to allowVPN which we have availablebut higher ups want it this way. I even suggested leaving them on the old server which is a pop server and just set up CR's for them to get them on the GAL but got shot down on that. I don't like doing it this way personally but Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Let a fool hold his tongue and he will pass for a sage. -Original Message-From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication Well correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're implementing POP, won't the users have to click something to send/receive their messages, even from Outlook? Are these remote offices part of your organization? Is setting up a VPN between eachoffice an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication Users. They like Outlook - they like the automatic checking for new messages without having to (horrors) click something. These people are sales people based in remote offices and not the most accepting of learning ANYTHING new. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The only way to amuse some people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement. -Original Message-From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication I forget..why isn't OWA an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: SMTP Authentication Hello Could not find anything on the Archives on this so hopefully one of you will have dealt with it Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT 4.0 sp6a Sent a question about POP a few days ago and am in the process of implementing it. My boss has talked to MS PSS just to be sure and he is telling me we are going to need to use a different SMTP server for them to send against. I thought using the setting in the POP connector for Exchange to relay for authenticated users in conjunction with having the Outlook client be set to "My Server requires Authentication" should allow them to send. These guys will be using various methods of accessing the internet from DSL to dialup so I cannot set IP settings for it. I have not implemented this yet but my tests from home using my cable modem seem ok. Any one have any insights? TIA Jim Why isn't the word "phonetically" spelled with an "f"? -- Steven Wright List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the communication in error.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm DO
RE: SMTP Authentication
Title: Message Bummer. Well I think Clear Channel has a couple of stations up here in Anchorage. I could round up some people that are listeners and call the powers that be and voice our disapproval of their suggested configuration for remote access to corporate email. If you think that would help. ;o) Wish I could be of more help. Good luck. Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication Outlook can automatically check pop accounts at intervals - say 5 minutes. Offices are part of the organization and I have requested either to put them on the WAN or to allowVPN which we have availablebut higher ups want it this way. I even suggested leaving them on the old server which is a pop server and just set up CR's for them to get them on the GAL but got shot down on that. I don't like doing it this way personally but Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Let a fool hold his tongue and he will pass for a sage. -Original Message-From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication Well correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're implementing POP, won't the users have to click something to send/receive their messages, even from Outlook? Are these remote offices part of your organization? Is setting up a VPN between eachoffice an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication Users. They like Outlook - they like the automatic checking for new messages without having to (horrors) click something. These people are sales people based in remote offices and not the most accepting of learning ANYTHING new. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The only way to amuse some people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement. -Original Message-From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication I forget..why isn't OWA an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: SMTP Authentication Hello Could not find anything on the Archives on this so hopefully one of you will have dealt with it Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT 4.0 sp6a Sent a question about POP a few days ago and am in the process of implementing it. My boss has talked to MS PSS just to be sure and he is telling me we are going to need to use a different SMTP server for them to send against. I thought using the setting in the POP connector for Exchange to relay for authenticated users in conjunction with having the Outlook client be set to "My Server requires Authentication" should allow them to send. These guys will be using various methods of accessing the internet from DSL to dialup so I cannot set IP settings for it. I have not implemented this yet but my tests from home using my cable modem seem ok. Any one have any insights? TIA Jim Why isn't the word "phonet
RE: SMTP Authentication
Title: Message not a Clear Channel issue - just our little division - they even have stranger rules but I am not going to go there. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are going to have a new love affair. -Original Message-From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication Bummer. Well I think Clear Channel has a couple of stations up here in Anchorage. I could round up some people that are listeners and call the powers that be and voice our disapproval of their suggested configuration for remote access to corporate email. If you think that would help. ;o) Wish I could be of more help. Good luck. Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication Outlook can automatically check pop accounts at intervals - say 5 minutes. Offices are part of the organization and I have requested either to put them on the WAN or to allowVPN which we have availablebut higher ups want it this way. I even suggested leaving them on the old server which is a pop server and just set up CR's for them to get them on the GAL but got shot down on that. I don't like doing it this way personally but Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Let a fool hold his tongue and he will pass for a sage. -Original Message-From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication Well correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're implementing POP, won't the users have to click something to send/receive their messages, even from Outlook? Are these remote offices part of your organization? Is setting up a VPN between eachoffice an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication Users. They like Outlook - they like the automatic checking for new messages without having to (horrors) click something. These people are sales people based in remote offices and not the most accepting of learning ANYTHING new. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The only way to amuse some people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement. -Original Message-From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication I forget..why isn't OWA an option? Regards, Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: SMTP Authentication Hello Could not find anything on the Archives on this so hopefully one of you will have dealt with it Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT 4.0 sp6a Sent a question about POP a few days ago and am in the process
