[expert] kfm and browser password

1999-07-25 Thread Ramon Gandia

I am using Festen (Mandrake 5.3).  When I go to a certain 
site with kfm, I cannot access the site because it needs
a username and password.  How do I do it with kfm?  I have
no problem with Netscape, but do not know how in kfm.

-- 
Ramon Gandia = Sysadmin  Nook Net
http://www.nook.net  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
285 West First Avenue   tel. 907-443-7575
P.O. Box 970fax. 907-443-2487
Nome, Alaska 99762-0970 == Alaska Toll Free. 888-443-7525



Re: [expert] (More) problems with vmware and recompiled kernel

1999-07-25 Thread Patrick Putteman

I'll post my config file I with kernel 2.2.10-mdk ??? and that runs VMWARE
without problems on monday (it's on my office machine)

Patrick

- Original Message -
From: Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 5:54 PM
Subject: [expert] (More) problems with vmware and recompiled kernel


 I've been trying to set up vmware (version 1.0.3), and in preperation,
I've
 recompiled my kernel from the src rpm (kernel-2.2.10-32mdk from Cooker --
a
 couple of weeks old now).

 I compiled relatively light-weight kernel, to drive my Intel P2/BX
chipset,
 64MB ram, IDE based system. I have no floppy, but I have an ls120. I
missed
 out pretty much anything that I don't need for this workstation.

 After running menu config I changed the tag string to 2.2.10-32mdk-sjm1,
and
 did 'make dep  make clean  make bzImage  make modules  make
 modules_install'. The kernel runs the machine ok, but it won't run vmware.

 I have a Win98 installation on a FAT partition, and I was planning to run
 this in vmware, but I get a segfault as soon as I "power up" the vitual
 machine.

 How can I help to get this problem licked in time for MD6.1? I could post
my
 menuconfig files if that's interesting to the kernel-hackers at MD.
Helpful
 for me would be to see the config file from a kernel that works with
vmware.

 Steven




[expert] Big Time Kernel Problems

1999-07-25 Thread James Capone

Ok Here it is.

   I recompiled my Kernel. Had some problems at first. It hung on Finding
Module dependencies..

So I did a ctrl-c and got it to boot.

The I run depmod -a reboot

I got abunch of Symlink errors. So I decided to run a make clean and make
mrproper and re-do the kernel again.

Now this time When I boot it just gets to
Running Linux...

Then never passes that. So I boot into the Old Kernel and it fails on
loading modules also. It will try to but Fail on some of them. So I am going
to Re-install the Entire OS. No big deal it was not configured yet. Here is
my problem. By default it has the PPP as a module. I need it to load at boot
up. Is there a way I can add this to the conf.modules to do so. Also I need
it to use the apm function of the new 2.2.9 kernel. Instead of attempting to
Re-compile again. Can I add that somehow. Is there a program that will allow
me to change some of the Kernel parameters.

Please allow me to know. But If I do need to recompile should I do it in the
/usr/src/linux Directory or the /usr/src/linux-2.2.9 directory. I believe
the /linux one is a linked one because it shows up as linux@

Please let me know. And should I blow away the /lib/modules directory before
I compile so it will load it correctly.

Sorry for the Long Winded message I just wanted to explain myself.

James J. Capone

Webmaster: http://linuxuser.8m.com
Asst. Webmaster http://www.ptm.com
Co-Author: Linux for Newbies
"Even Common People can attain uncommon results!"



Re: [expert] network

1999-07-25 Thread Axalon



On Sun, 25 Jul 1999, [iso-8859-1] Mike Fistonich wrote:

 Thanks for the advice ,
 unfortunately I was too busy to try your suggestions yet,  but I'm 
 also not confident they'll help
 since after typing 'telnet 90.0.0.3' I immediatley 
 get the response 'connected to 90.0.0.3' but 
 it then takes a long time for the login prompt after connecting . (
 lynx  netscape also get an immediate response from the other
 machine(i.e the apache intro page))

Right, and if you put your IP   HOSTNAME in /etc/hosts
inetd will not take forever trying to figure out if it should let you in
or not. Apache does not use the tcpwrappers by default so, if apache
responds instantly it points even more to the tcpwrappers. 
 
 --- Axalon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
  On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Linux Happy User wrote:
  
   Mike Fistonich wrote:
   
Hi
Does anyone how I can reduce the long delay when
telnetting between two linux (L-M 5.3) boxes ,
they can ping eachother with no delay but
ftp   telnet do nothing for 30s or so
before the login prompt .
cheers
   
   
  _
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at
  http://mail.yahoo.com
   
   Check the way each machine is recognized by the
  other. You may have an
   authorization file '/etc/hosts.allow' refering to
  a DNS domain (like
   ALL: .local.domain) while address for your
  machines can not be resolved
   through the DNS. To check that the source of your
  problem, try putting
   en 'IP / hostname' mapping in the /etc/hosts of
  your machines for the
   other machine.
   
   Didier
   
  
  Yep this is probably whats going on, if they give
  you to much grief setup
  a mini dns server. Putting them in /etc/hosts should
  solve it however
  
  
 
 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
 



[expert] Firewalling on 2.2: UPDATE

1999-07-25 Thread ShawnDo

Ok, I have since reinstalled Mandrake and was lazy
and didn't do the kernel update (as suggested by
updates page for security) and the network survived
the 20 hr mark. (where the network died before)
I didn't realize this (I attributed this to 
something else) and updated the kernel to 2.2.9-27mdk.

 20 hours later, the network died!.  So I'm back to
the 
original kernel 2.2.9-19mdk (with the
"networking security bug" and all.  I don't
know what to attribute this to.  My past suspicions
relate to the dhcpcd, but I have no idea if that 
relates to the kernel.  If anyone has ideas on why
this
works let me know, 
thanks!

--- ShawnDo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 04:19:58 -0400 (EDT)
 From: ShawnDo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [expert] Firewalling on 2.2
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I installed the new mandrake release
 and promptly setup the ipchain rules 
 using the 3 step process in the ipchains HOWTO.
 It works perfectly for about 20 hours, then
 for some reason, the Network just dies., can't ping
 anything, including my internal network!.(no error 
 messages either)  I have done
 all the updates, but I just can't figure it out.
 I reboot, then everything works fine again, for
 about
 another 20 hours.  It happens wether the network is
 IDLE or actively downloading stuff. sometimes it is
 the 
 only the outside interface that dies.
 
 I have been runn Mandrake 5.3
 for a very long time, and it had no problems, so Its
 not the hardware. And it is not 
 
 I have 2 SMC 10 mbit cards (ne2k)
 the outgoing interface is eth1
 and the internal interface is eth0
 
 I am using Time Warner's Road Runner, and I am 
 using a perl MD5 login
 script that has been working for the past 10 months
 (hourly cron job)
 
 I'm going to try redhat 6.0 if I can't solve this
 thing 
 by this weekend, but Im worried I will run into the 
 same problem.
 

_
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at
 http://mail.yahoo.com
 
 

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



Re: [expert] cgi scripts

1999-07-25 Thread Jean-Michel Dault


As far as I am concerned, there are no stupid questions. As you probably
noticed, I often refer people to the right place, or give the answer it if
can fit in one line or two.

Please everyone don't say "please post in an appropriate forum". Even me,
an experienced Linux user, I often don't know what the appropriate forum
is. Imagine a new user...

A better attitude would be to say "You will probably get a better answer
there: (insert URL or newsgroup)." This way, you save bandwidth, stop a
flame war, help someone, and probably get a "thank you". Everydody's
happy.

Jean-Michel Dault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sun, 25 Jul 1999, Mark Cooper wrote:

 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 11:15:53 -0400
 From: Mark Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [expert] cgi scripts
 
 Well Put.  I am glad someone understands the concept of this mailing list.
 -Original Message-
 From: Ramon Gandia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Saturday, July 24, 1999 3:10 PM
 Subject: Re: [expert] cgi scripts
 
 
 Jason Bodnar wrote:
  
  I don't want to be the jerk of the list but this is definitely not a
  question relating to mandrake. Could you please ask it in a more
  appropriate forum.
 
 I disagree with you.  The fellow is using an Apache web server on
 a Mandrake 6.0 server.
 
 Because packages install differently on different Linux distros,
 and different Unix systems, a lot of problems are related to the
 type and location of libraries, and other distribution-specific
 things.
 
 It is entirely possible his cgi-script problem ONLY arises in
 Mandrake.   And even if not, the answer to his problem may not
 be correct or applicable to him if answered by an AIX or HPUX
 sysadm.  
 
 Mandrake is a distribution employing many different componets;
 many of them tweaked by RedHat and Mandrake to specific
 configuration and purposes.  If an individual has ANY problems
 when using Mandrake, then THIS is the apporpiate venue to ask
 questions.
 
 More specifically, he has a problem with a DOCTYPE... header.
 This could well be Mandrake specific.  There is an HTML validation
 service at http://validator.w3.org/ which may be able to answer
 his problem.  It does have extensive documentation and help on
 the DOCTYPE... tags.  Basically I think that either his tag
 is wrong, or it mentions an HTML level which his Apache server
 does not understand.  Running the web page with cgi script past
 the validator should yield the answer.
 
 
 
 -- 
 Ramon Gandia = Sysadmin  Nook Net
 http://www.nook.net  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 285 West First Avenue   tel. 907-443-7575
 P.O. Box 970fax. 907-443-2487
 Nome, Alaska 99762-0970 == Alaska Toll Free. 888-443-7525
 
 



Re: [expert] FW: Redhat 6.0 cachemgr.cgi lameness

1999-07-25 Thread Jean-Michel Dault


This cgi must be a part of the Squid package, because it's not in Apache.

Jean-Michel Dault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Sat, 24 Jul 1999, James J. Capone wrote:

 Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 22:35:14 -0400
 From: "James J. Capone" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [expert] FW: Redhat 6.0 cachemgr.cgi lameness
 
 This could also go for Mandrake 6.0 that same file is in the cgi-bin directory. 
Cover yourselves...
 
 James J. Capone
 
 ***
 Webmaster http://www.linuxuser.8m.com
 Webmaster http://www.teammajestic.8m.com
 Asst. Webmaster http://www.ptm.com
 Co-Author: Linux For Newbies
 
 "Even Common People Can Attain Uncommon Results"
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 7:37 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Redhat 6.0 cachemgr.cgi lameness
 
 Hi... After installing Redhat 6.0, I looked around a bit and I
 noticed something interesting:
 In /home/httpd/cgi-bin there is a CGI program called cachemgr.cgi,
 and it can be accessed by remote users by default.
 So I went to look at it, and I noticed that what it does is it
 lets any user connect to any hostname/port he/she chooses via the
 interface it provides.. and then see the connection results -
 if the connection was not successful it prints out the full connect() error;
 otherwise it just stays frozen, waiting for HTTP data, or httpd might
 give you an "Internal Server Error" - Both of those mean that a connection
 has been established.
 This is what it looks like from lynx:
 
 Cache Manager Interface
 
This is a WWW interface to the instrumentation interface for the Squid
object cache.
  _
 
Cache Host: localhost_
Cache Port: 3128__
Manager name: __
Password: __
 
Continue...
 
 This is, obviously, not good, because this CGI program can be used as a
 powerful portscanning or a denial of service tool. I suggest that Redhat
 6.0 users check to see if they have it, and then disable it if they do.
 
 - Daniel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])