Re: [expert] OT: w98 equiv to this list

2000-09-10 Thread John Rye


Email me privately Doug - I have a fix...
Cheers

Doug McGarrett wrote:
 
 Does anyone here know of a Windows 98 equivalent to
 this mailing list?  I need one question answered, but
 if someone here was willing to do so, I'd be very happy
 not to have to mess with a Windows list.
 
 Question:  I'm converting from an all-SCSI system to a
 hybrid that will have an IDE hard drive.  (I can't fight
 the prices any more!)  Is there any way that I can convert
 what is presently on the SCSI drive to the new system,
 without reloading the OS and all the apps from scratch.
 I'd like not to have to reload WP, AutoCad, etc., especially
 since some are upgrades, and would require 2 or 3 earlier
 programs to be installed first, for no reason except to
 permit the upgrade to install.
 (Yes I know I can copy the _data_ files from WordPerfect,
 AutoCad, etc.)
 
 New machine will have SCSI--different card--but could have
 old card for a little while, or forever, for that matter.
 New machine will have "old" SCSI format, just enough to
 isolate cd-r from rest of system, for example.  SCSI-2.
 Also to allow JAZ drives to plug in and work.
 
 Of course, the humongous drive will have Linux on it, right
 after W98, which _insists_ on being first.  Any caveats
 there are welcome.
 
 Please copy replies to the list. I'm probably one of few
 but not alone with this kind of question.
 
 BTW, this is a great list.  I don't read everything, since
 I have a life to live, but there is a whole heck of a lot of
 expertise here!
 
 TIA for any help I get.  --doug
 
   
 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

-- 
ICQ# 89345394 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] fg: no job control problem.

2000-09-10 Thread clorden

Hello all.

I tryed to recompile several SRPMS on my (fresh installed) MDK 7.1 box but i got
this strange error message: "fg: no job control". It happens with XFree86-4.0.1
(cooker) and other packages. 

Any ideas?

Thanks!




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Xserver connection refused

2000-09-10 Thread José Antonio Jiménez Berni

I'm not sure, but that sounds like a problem I had once. Are you sure that
the problem is with the nfs daemon instead of xfs daemon?.
What happened to me was that after a reboot X wasn't able to reboot again
because the xfs couldn't create a lock or something like that.

After some hours of head aching the problem was that I had not enought
disk space, so try to se 'df' command and if your HD is exhausted clean some
temporary files.

Berni


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Now for the downside of reliability...

 Last time I rebooted my 7.0-2 system , I had something wrong (with
 permissions, I think?) which would not let me start my xserver even
 from root.  I "fixed" it from the command line and , well, ..it's been
 so long I forgot what I did.  Stupidly, I didn't REALLY fix the problem.

 Basically, at boot I get a connection refused (error 111) when trying
 to start the NFS demon,  Later, I get an error 111 trying startx.

 Any clues?  (I promise to FIX it this time).

 Thanks,
   Howard

 Howard Lightstone

   
 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

--
La frase célebre para hoy es 

Every 1.5 years computers double in speed, then Windows slow them back.

-
|   José Antonio Jiménez Berni  |
|C/ Músico Ziryab, 17 3-2   |
|   14005   Córdoba |
|Spain  |
|   |
|Phone: +34 957413730   |
|GSM:   +34 656255563   |
|ICQ: 28939390  |
|   e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
-






Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Modem speed?

2000-09-10 Thread José Antonio Jiménez Berni

Is there any way to know the speed of my modem when I connect to the
internet? (33'6k,56k)


--
La frase célebre para hoy es 

lo que más me gusta de mí es mi infiníta modestia.




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Modem speed?

2000-09-10 Thread Steve Howes

On Sun, 10 Sep 2000 11:00:41 +0200 "José Antonio Jiménez" wrote:

 Is there any way to know the speed of my modem when I connect to the
 internet? (33'6k,56k)
 

For me I stick W2 in my dial command, eg ATW2DT0123456789


--
Steve - Cheltenham, UK
-
In love and light we are
In darkness we are no less






Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] 2.2.17 Kernel - Automount Feature Missing

2000-09-10 Thread Anton Graham

Submitted 09-Sep-00 by Stephen Bosch:

 2.2.17 isn't an official kernel patch (i.e., it's a Mandrake patch

I'm afraid you are mistaken.  2.2.17 *is* official.

-- 
Anton GrahamGPG ID: 0x18F78541
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RSA key available upon request
 
"Have you noticed there are no interesting people in heaven? Just a hint to
the girls as to where they can find their salvation."
  -- Nietzche, "The Will to Power"




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] XF86Setup error

2000-09-10 Thread C Nielsen

Yes, it uses the SVGA Server and it's installed..tryed to install all the
servers so it wouldn't have a problem finding it, still no luck.

 On Sat, 09 Sep
2000, you wrote:  
 That is very strange, esp. when you are not even using a Trident video card. Did you 
select the right X
 server for you ATI Rage Fury?
 
 C Nielsen wrote:
 
  Here is a weird one. I have just completed installing 7.1 ( I actually bought
  the entire packaged deal this time) and when I ran XF86Setup to fine tune some
  things, I get the message as follows;
 
  Warning SERVER specification missing in Card database entry Trident TGUI9660 
(generic) (line 2513).
  Warning SERVER specification missing in Card database entry Trident TGUI9680 
(generic) (line 2519).
  Warning SERVER specification missing in Card database entry Trident Cyber 9320 
(generic) (line 2537).
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)
 
   Now I've had no trouble like this with 7.0 and it dosen't matter if I use
  Xconfigurator either, I get the same thing...any ideas?
 
  System
  AMD K6 3-400
  128 ram
  SB Live sound
  ATI Rage Fury 32 meg
 
   Thanx
 

  Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
  Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
 
 
 


Content-Type: text/plain; name="message.footer"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Description: 


-- 
If you don't know, ask
If you do know, tell



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] ReiserFS

2000-09-10 Thread Charles Curley

On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 12:21:09PM +0800, BillK wrote:
 Had to answer this one.  As far as a new HD NOW, I did, around 4 yrs
 ago, but decided to keep using this one as well untill it really died,
 which it hasnt yet!!  Its also been moved into different machines a
 number of times, with no change.  The drive has been losing sectors at
 this rate for approx 4 yrs.  Its an old seagate 2.1 gig on my daughters

Four years! Wow. If I were still working at Maxtor, I'd offer to buy it
from you to find out what is going on. That's wild.

The industry standard reaction to loosing several sectors is: replace
it. So it is possible that a lot of drives could have gone on for years
like this one, but were replaced as a precaution.


 PC that gets used for WP  browsing an a few games.  Total lost sector
 count stabilizes around 300-400 or so after a few months.  e2fsk or dos
 scandisk never pick up all the sectors at once, tho scandisk seems
 better initially - picks up around a hundred on install, e2fsck only
 gets a dozen or so on install.  Eventually I will replace it, but seems
 like it will go on in this fashion for a few more years yet, so I am
 unwilling to spend at this time, raticularly if there is a satisfactory
 work around - its just anoying having to fsck it every so often!  As to
 the mechanism of a failure of this type, I dont know as I have never
 seen a drive fail in this fashion and keep going for so long before.

Well, I'd replace it just so I wouldn't have to bother with the hassle of
replacing eaten files, etc.

-- 

-- C^2

No windows were crashed in the making of this email.

Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley
 PGP signature


[expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread Dr Michael Powell, Ph.D.



To the cooker and expert list;
 Are you people so insecure that when
I sign my imput and use the title that did not come easily, and one that
I am proud of, that you have to try and belittle me for NO appartent reason.
The Dr. means that I went through post graduate school with 3.8 average
and the Ph.D. shows that I am not an MD. My disertation was in Theoryetical
Physics. So give me a break here, you might learn something.
--
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
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 S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Re [expert] pppd dying unexpectedly

2000-09-10 Thread Stephen F. Bosch

"D. R. Evans" wrote:

 If I kill the script-based bit, then I never get to the PAP. BOTH are
 necessary, which does seem faintly ridiculous. But perhaps not without
 precedent; this is, after all, USWest.
 
 (Maybe this whole thing has something to do with the takeover, since they
 are now QWest. But it's probably just a coinicidence. It's no good asking
 them. They don't seem to have a clue about much at all. In the course of
 the last three months I have contacted tech support three times. They
 didn't solve a single one of the problems.)

That's because all the really talented people are not working for
peanuts in tech support anymore.

-Stephen-



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] 2.2.17 Kernel - Automount Feature Missing

2000-09-10 Thread Stephen F. Bosch

Anton Graham wrote:
 
 Submitted 09-Sep-00 by Stephen Bosch:
 
  2.2.17 isn't an official kernel patch (i.e., it's a Mandrake patch
 
 I'm afraid you are mistaken.  2.2.17 *is* official.

As of when? I tried to find it two weeks ago, and it wasn't on
ftp.kernel.org.

-Stephen-



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: Re [expert] pppd dying unexpectedly

2000-09-10 Thread John Rye

"Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
 
 "D. R. Evans" wrote:
 
  If I kill the script-based bit, then I never get to the PAP. BOTH are
  necessary, which does seem faintly ridiculous. But perhaps not without
  precedent; this is, after all, USWest.
 
  (Maybe this whole thing has something to do with the takeover, since they
  are now QWest. But it's probably just a coinicidence. It's no good asking
  them. They don't seem to have a clue about much at all. In the course of
  the last three months I have contacted tech support three times. They
  didn't solve a single one of the problems.)
 
 That's because all the really talented people are not working for
 peanuts in tech support anymore.
 
 -Stephen-

There is a very good diagnostic-type page on setting up PPP
at:
 http://www.linux-firewall-tools.com/linux/ 
There is/are serverl pages of step by step instructions on how
to go about the process of figuring out just what the ISP expects
to process during your login.

It may be very useful in diagnosing just what is happening here.

Cheers

-- 
ICQ# 89345394 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread Muzza

On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 To the cooker and expert list;
 Are you people so insecure that when
 I sign my imput and use the title that did not come easily, and one that
 I am proud of, that you have to try and belittle me for NO appartent reason.
 The Dr. means that I went through post graduate school with 3.8 average
 and the Ph.D. shows that I am not an MD. My disertation was in Theoryetical
 Physics. So give me a break here, you might learn something.

Hey, right with you on that one ... being a university drop-out, I can
understand what you had to go through to EARN a Ph.D.  You don't get those
suckers from a breakfast cereal box!  A belated well done and congrates from
down under.

Muzza.

BTW  My three immediate bosses all have Ph.D's.
 -- 
Mandrake Linux 7.1
Current Linux uptime: 12 days 11 hours 3 minutes.



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread Charles Curley

On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 05:48:30PM -0400, Dr Michael Powell, Ph.D. wrote:
 


To the cooker and expert list;
  Are you people so insecure that when I sign my imput and use the
title that did not come easily, and one that I am proud of, that you
have to try and belittle me for NO appartent reason. The Dr. means
that I went through post graduate school with 3.8 average and the
Ph.D. shows that I am not an MD. My disertation was in Theoryetical
Physics. So give me a break here, you might learn something.

Dr. Powell, if you got all the way to a fud without learning how to spell,
punctuate, or capitalize, perhaps you shouldn't be so damned proud of it.

Netiquette is derived from North American usage for the very simple reason
that it was North Americans who invented the Internet, invented email, and
invented lists and usenet. It is customary in North America, where, I
believe, most of the list members reside, for non-MDs to use their
credentials only in a professional context. Next time you present a paper
on theoretical physics, feel free to use the Ph.D. (With the
Ph.D. present, the Dr. is redundant, for reasons that are obvious if you
know how to expand both abbreviations.) However, this list is very
practical and about computers, not physics. In this context, your
doctorate is irrelevant. Your use of your alphabet soup, however hard
earned, came across here as pretentious. Linux users are pioneers, and,
like all pioneers, they have little use for pomposity. Perhaps the list
over-reacted in toasting you unmercifully, perhaps not. But you left
yourself open for it, so don't complain that you got it.

As for giving you a break, you ought to have given yourself a break by not
raising the subject again. On the expert list (I cannot address the cooker
list), the matter was over, done with, and forgotten until you posted this
email. Apparently, you missed another lesson of undergraduate work, which
is that if you wish to avoid hazing by upperclassmen, you don't offer them
invitations to do it.

While we are on the subject of etiquette, it is unnecessary to post your
public key in your signature. Either a URL, or posting your key to a key
server and providing its length and fingerprint, are sufficient.


 -- 
 -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
 Version: PGP 6.5.8
 
 mQGiBDm4v6YRBADUzSr+X7TuAvbaaa1u8wrpTNijkN0wqj8NJe9qHsHy2b7EEVHv
 s2PAk8iEnco7j51FK+ZbvrODqxkDeOLELvcpelxUzDGMw3Q7NBzA2vcE9UKgf2WM



-- 

-- C^2

No windows were crashed in the making of this email.

Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley
 PGP signature


Re: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread Gary


 On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, "Dr-PhD" == Dr Michael Powell, Ph.D. wrote:

  Dr-PhD To the cooker and expert list;   Are you people so insecure
  Dr-PhD that when I sign my imput and use the title that did not come
  Dr-PhD easily, and one that I am proud of, that you have to try and
  Dr-PhD belittle me for NO appartent reason. The Dr. means that I went
  Dr-PhD through post graduate school with 3.8 average and the Ph.D.
  Dr-PhD shows that I am not an MD. My disertation was in Theoryetical
  Dr-PhD Physics. So give me a break here, you might learn something.

I cannot believe I have seen this.  However, since you decided to make 
this a public issue, I shall respond.  Are *you* so insecure that your 
education did not provide you with proper grammar?  How did you get 
through school?  It is very apparent that your signature is both improper and 
just plain *wrong.*  Any reference citation book, whether it be "The Chicago 
Manual of Style" or "Publication Manual of the American Psychological 
Association" states you use one or the other, not *both.*  If you never 
used this throughout your advanced education, than common sense certainly 
should have.  A proper signature line is as basic as verb tenses. 

It amazes me that you do not know this, and it appears that your peers do
know it.  I sure hope you had work oral instead of written work, as it
seems you cannot identify your own proper signature block., as indicated
above, you ego with your 3.8 average seems to get in the way. I find it
humorous that you must tell this list what your deeds and grades were, as
well as explaining "what the letters mean."   We do not care, and since my
wife and I both have 4.0 PhDs, I really do not think we can "learn
something" from you.   You assume too much, or perhaps think too little of
the people on this group.   BTW doc, your "theoryetical" is misspelled. 

At least learn the proper way to identify yourself in public writing.  

Gary (I do not need an ego booster)






Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread Benjamin Reed

 Are you people so insecure that when I sign my imput

Speaking of insecure, you digitally sign your e-mails with a different
address than you send with.  :)

--
Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://defiance.dyndns.org/ / http://radio.scenespot.org/
Now playing on Defiance Radio: Enjoy The Silence by Depeche Mode





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread Dr Michael Powell, Ph.D.


Benjamin Reed wrote:
> Are you people so insecure that when I sign my
imput
Speaking of insecure, you digitally sign your e-mails with a different
address than you send with. :)
--
Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://defiance.dyndns.org/
/ http://radio.scenespot.org/
Now playing on Defiance Radio: Enjoy The Silence by Depeche Mode
 
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
Gee, maybe I have more than "1" computer and use 2 different key codes,
Duh!
--
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
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 S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [expert] HTML and netiquet???

2000-09-10 Thread marler

On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Dr Michael Powell, Ph.D. wrote:

 Cher Monsieur; un ecrit: est une compagnie entertainmaent française, est
 que là où vous avez trouvé votre " netiquet". Son l'année 2000 si vous
 ne pouvez pas manipuler le HTML, ce monsieur, est un problème personnel.
 Jusque ma signature 2, j'emploie leur traînée 60 libre pour voir qui je
 souhaite utiliser.


In my experience, most of us who do our work on platforms running some
Unix variant use email readers like Elm or Pine, which do not handle
bandwidth-wasting HTML well. It's no surprise that, given the recent
popularity of Linux, many users turn to the built-in email functionality
of Netscape, since the browser is part of most all distributions. However,
it's quite easy to turn HTML off, and I can't really see any reason not to
when posting to this list. As for this particular poster, though, I've
added a filter to trash any message from a user whose "From:" string
contains both "Dr" and "Ph.d.". 

/b
-- 

Barry Marler
Plant Genome Mapping Laboratory
University of Georgia
Rm 158, Riverbend Research Center
110 Riverbend Road
Athens, GA 30602






Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] glibc direct source compile, any suggesstions?

2000-09-10 Thread Kumba

Yeah, I'm going to trya direct Source compile.  Does
anyone have any methods to go about doing this?, I
hear stuff about being areful not to overwrite your
header files or soemthing.  A configure option I found
that was supposedly useable was:

./configure --enable-add-ons=linuxthreads,crypt
--prefix=/usr

I don't know if it's wise to use /usr or not, but I
essentially want to overwrite the glibc 2.1.2-10
version that I have with the 2.1.3-19 version I want
to compile.  Should that configure line, plus make,
make check, and make install work fine for me, or are
there other steps I need to do or take to get a
successful compile w/o fubar'ing my entire system?

--Kumba


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] 2.2.17 Kernel - Automount Feature Missing

2000-09-10 Thread john bodanske

It's less than a week old, I think
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen F. Bosch" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] 2.2.17 Kernel - Automount Feature Missing


 Anton Graham wrote:
 
  Submitted 09-Sep-00 by Stephen Bosch:
 
   2.2.17 isn't an official kernel patch (i.e., it's a Mandrake patch
 
  I'm afraid you are mistaken.  2.2.17 *is* official.

 As of when? I tried to find it two weeks ago, and it wasn't on
 ftp.kernel.org.

 -Stephen-








 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] HTML and netiquet???

2000-09-10 Thread john bodanske

je ne parle pas francais
Khun Phud pasa thai dai mai krap?
laew pasa lao dai boh?
ni whei shuo zhongwen ma?
Maybe we can find a language to communicate on
- Original Message -
From: "Dr Michael Powell, Ph.D." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 7:39 PM
Subject: [expert] HTML and "netiquet"???


 Cher Monsieur; un ecrit: est une compagnie entertainmaent française, est
 que là où vous avez trouvé votre " netiquet". Son l'année 2000 si vous
 ne pouvez pas manipuler le HTML, ce monsieur, est un problème personnel.
 Jusque ma signature 2, j'emploie leur traînée 60 libre pour voir qui je
 souhaite utiliser.

 Dr Michael Powell Ph.D
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread bascule

dear sir,

how offended you must have been to come across non north american usage
in a north american mailing list.. oh wait, but it it isn't is it?  that
aside, i could have sworn that a chap called berners-lee had at least a
minor role in creating the current internet paradigm but what would i
know? - not being north american you see.

a person can call themselves what they want, and if a falsehood isn't
involved - who cares, and why? 
the 'internet' is a social phenomenon with a diversity that makes it a
fitting companion alongside such other phenomena as the open source
movement, as such it(we) are about as international as  it is possible
to get.

as a computer user i am relatively speaking a know-nothing, and say
little (though perhaps too soon sometimes) but learn quite a bit,; as a
member of the social grouping that is this list (and it is a social
grouping-the pheromonal vibe sometimes would give anyone a silver
streak), i feel uncomfortable at standing (so to speak) at the back and
not saying anything about how fellow members are sometimes treated.  
at the risk of prolonging this catalogue of haranguing and feverish
denouncement i feel i must stand up for Dr. Michael Powell, Ph.D.'s
right to identify himself as he wishes.

bascule-it'sthenameofacharacterfromabookbutheythat'smeiguessthejigisup,ohnohowfoolishimustlookwhatwillnorthamericathinkofmenow?

toCharles Curley wrote:
 
 On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 05:48:30PM -0400, Dr Michael Powell, Ph.D. wrote:
 
 
 
 To the cooker and expert list;
   Are you people so insecure that when I sign my imput and use the
 title that did not come easily, and one that I am proud of, that you
 have to try and belittle me for NO appartent reason. The Dr. means
 that I went through post graduate school with 3.8 average and the
 Ph.D. shows that I am not an MD. My disertation was in Theoryetical
 Physics. So give me a break here, you might learn something.
 
 Dr. Powell, if you got all the way to a fud without learning how to spell,
 punctuate, or capitalize, perhaps you shouldn't be so damned proud of it.
 
 Netiquette is derived from North American usage for the very simple reason
 that it was North Americans who invented the Internet, invented email, and
 invented lists and usenet. It is customary in North America, where, I
 believe, most of the list members reside, for non-MDs to use their
 credentials only in a professional context. Next time you present a paper
 on theoretical physics, feel free to use the Ph.D. (With the
 Ph.D. present, the Dr. is redundant, for reasons that are obvious if you
 know how to expand both abbreviations.) However, this list is very
 practical and about computers, not physics. In this context, your
 doctorate is irrelevant. Your use of your alphabet soup, however hard
 earned, came across here as pretentious. Linux users are pioneers, and,
 like all pioneers, they have little use for pomposity. Perhaps the list
 over-reacted in toasting you unmercifully, perhaps not. But you left
 yourself open for it, so don't complain that you got it.
 
 As for giving you a break, you ought to have given yourself a break by not
 raising the subject again. On the expert list (I cannot address the cooker
 list), the matter was over, done with, and forgotten until you posted this
 email. Apparently, you missed another lesson of undergraduate work, which
 is that if you wish to avoid hazing by upperclassmen, you don't offer them
 invitations to do it.
 
 While we are on the subject of etiquette, it is unnecessary to post your
 public key in your signature. Either a URL, or posting your key to a key
 server and providing its length and fingerprint, are sufficient.
 
  --
  -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
  Version: PGP 6.5.8
 
  mQGiBDm4v6YRBADUzSr+X7TuAvbaaa1u8wrpTNijkN0wqj8NJe9qHsHy2b7EEVHv
  s2PAk8iEnco7j51FK+ZbvrODqxkDeOLELvcpelxUzDGMw3Q7NBzA2vcE9UKgf2WM
 
 --
 
 -- C^2
 
 No windows were crashed in the making of this email.
 
 Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
 http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley
 
   
Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread burk


Hey, Hey, Hey, everybody!

Dr. Powell was responding to a thread found in the archives here:

http://www.mail-archive.com/expert@linux-mandrake.com/msg23073.html

which may not have been meant as particularly nasty, but certainly came
across that way to me. In short, he took it personally and got mad. That
just proves that he's human. Realize that it can be quite difficult in the
hard sciences to get a PhD, and many people who have achieved that goal
are proud of it, and in the physical sciences signing you mail as Dr. So
And So, PhD is not uncommon.

Twit filtering Dr. Powell would seem overkill at this point. I have had to
twit several people on this list, however, and I must say after several
years on various Linux/Unix mailing lists/newsgroups, this group has
gotten nastier than the norm several times lately. Maybe we need a good
emacs vs. vi thread to get it out of our systems grin.
   
-burk

(Disclaimer: after 13 years as a analytical/physical biochemist, I think
unix system adminstration is much easier! It pays better too! )







Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



RE: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Joe Tux

welcome to the club!

I'm suffering the same thing with Netscape 4.74 (even prior to upgrade). The
same thing happened when I browse to a Flash-enabled website 'though I've
installed Flash plug-in :/


Joe
#186063

//-Original Message-
//From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Thompson
//Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 1:15 AM
//To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//Subject: [expert] IE5 for linux
//
//
//Someone posted a comment that IE5.5 was available for UNIX at
//ftp.microsoft.com and that they were using it. After searching through
//their ftp site I find IE5 for Solaris and HP-UX only, any one
//have anything
//on this. I hate to admit it but IE is much better than NS4xx or NS6 (at
//least it doesn't lock my system while browsing java pages).
//Using NS 4.74 at present..
//TIA,
// --
//Ken Thompson  WA7SYR
//Electrocom Computer Services Payette, Idaho 83661
//1-888-642-7101 Sales - Services - Repair
//Web: http://www,nwaa.com
//E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//Registered Linux User #183936
//Driver Petition sig.  # 00063954
//
//





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] ALSA and MpegTV Problem - Please Help

2000-09-10 Thread Brent Hawkins

Hello All,

I just switched over from the crappy OpenSound commercial sound driver to the
ALSA sounddriver for my Yamaha PCI soundcard.  The only problem now is that
MpegTV tells me "Cannot Play Audio: Broken Pipe".  Have any of you had success
with getting MpegTV to work with ALSA?

Thanks,
Brent


Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://home.netscape.com/webmail



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread Daniel Baker

Can we Drop this Topic and discuss what the damn thing is here for?

This is all personal conversation and unrelated to the topic. I am tired of
my bandwidth being wasted by this trivial childish B$.

Take it home to your personal email, I See enough of this at work, now
please go away.

Dan.



- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] are you so insecure



 Hey, Hey, Hey, everybody!

 Dr. Powell was responding to a thread found in the archives here:

 http://www.mail-archive.com/expert@linux-mandrake.com/msg23073.html

 which may not have been meant as particularly nasty, but certainly came
 across that way to me. In short, he took it personally and got mad. That
 just proves that he's human. Realize that it can be quite difficult in the
 hard sciences to get a PhD, and many people who have achieved that goal
 are proud of it, and in the physical sciences signing you mail as Dr. So
 And So, PhD is not uncommon.

 Twit filtering Dr. Powell would seem overkill at this point. I have had to
 twit several people on this list, however, and I must say after several
 years on various Linux/Unix mailing lists/newsgroups, this group has
 gotten nastier than the norm several times lately. Maybe we need a good
 emacs vs. vi thread to get it out of our systems grin.

 -burk

 (Disclaimer: after 13 years as a analytical/physical biochemist, I think
 unix system adminstration is much easier! It pays better too! )












 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



RE: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Ralph

You won't see ie5 for linux there is for unix but no port for linux
Gates hasent lost his mind yet!!
 

 
 I'm suffering the same thing with Netscape 4.74 (even prior to upgrade). The
 same thing happened when I browse to a Flash-enabled website 'though I've
 installed Flash plug-in :/




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Tyler Longren

Hate to admit it?  I think NS is crap.  IE is much better than NS.  If I
could get IE on linux, I would.  If you're looking for an alternative to NS
though, download the latest milestone of Mozilla.  And then download Galeon
(http://galeon.sourceforge.net).  Galeon uses Mozilla and it's pretty sweet.

Regards,
Tyler Longren


- Original Message -
From: "Ken Thompson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 10:15 AM
Subject: [expert] IE5 for linux


 Someone posted a comment that IE5.5 was available for UNIX at
 ftp.microsoft.com and that they were using it. After searching through
 their ftp site I find IE5 for Solaris and HP-UX only, any one have
anything
 on this. I hate to admit it but IE is much better than NS4xx or NS6 (at
 least it doesn't lock my system while browsing java pages).
 Using NS 4.74 at present..
 TIA,
  --
 Ken Thompson  WA7SYR
 Electrocom Computer Services Payette, Idaho 83661
 1-888-642-7101 Sales - Services - Repair
 Web: http://www,nwaa.com
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Registered Linux User #183936
 Driver Petition sig.  # 00063954








 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Greg Stewart

I believe, if you are good enough at hacking the install, you may be able to
pull off using IE5 in linux from the Solaris/HP-UX source. I don't know the
diffrences, but if all it takes is getting a few libraries, and creating
symlinks to the correct files, I don't see why it shouldn't work.

Of course, it may turn out that I have no idea what I'm talking about.

--Greg

- Original Message -
From: "Joe Tux" [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 welcome to the club!

 I'm suffering the same thing with Netscape 4.74 (even prior to upgrade).
The
 same thing happened when I browse to a Flash-enabled website 'though I've
 installed Flash plug-in :/


 Joe
 #186063

 //-Original Message-
 //Someone posted a comment that IE5.5 was available for UNIX at
 //ftp.microsoft.com and that they were using it. After searching through
 //their ftp site I find IE5 for Solaris and HP-UX only, any one
 //have anything
 //on this. I hate to admit it but IE is much better than NS4xx or NS6 (at
 //least it doesn't lock my system while browsing java pages).
 //Using NS 4.74 at present..
 //TIA,
 // --
 //Ken Thompson  WA7SYR


 
__
Vous avez un site perso ?
2 millions de francs à gagner sur i(france) !
Webmasters : ZE CONCOURS ! http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/concours.emailif





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Hoyt


- Original Message -
From: "Ralph" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 2:47 PM
Subject: RE: [expert] IE5 for linux


 You won't see ie5 for linux there is for unix but no port for linux
 Gates hasent lost his mind yet!!



Kind of useable under WINE, but I've never gotten it to work.

Hoyt







Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread Greg Stewart

Sorry to have to do this, but the demonstrative pomposity of those who are
actually engaging this poor gentleman in a war over what should be treated
as an oversight, typographic error, or linguistic inconsistency is simply
becoming an issue ad nauseam. Further, his own belated response to the
original attacks should have been, by your own suggestion, ignored.

In defense of those of us who happen to be bi- or multi-lingual, the issue
with cross linguistic grammar rules can occasionally become subject to
confusion. As well, acceptable usage and rules, cross-culturally, oft
differs greatly.

I have done the following corrections to the most appropriate example of
such hypocrisy, and it should, in no way, be received as an attack on the
individual from which it came, but as a suggestion to all to keep ego in
touch with reality for those who would criticise the mistakes of others.
Prior to expecting the perfection of others, expect it of yourselves.

In short, the behaviour of those who have responded unkindly to any post
found in this list has been inacceptable. With this post, I am not excluded;
however, in light of the issue, and in an attempt to bring civility to the
future postings of this list, I have felt it necessary to do so.

--Greg

P.S. I have actually used spell-check, and double-proofed the grammar of my
own post on this occasion. Normally, I would post without the bother of this
activity for it demands time and extra effort: two things for which I have
little patience when associated with non-professional e-mail.

- Original Message -
From: "Gary" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I cannot believe I have seen this.  However, since you decided to make
 this a public issue, I shall respond.  Are *you* so insecure that your
 education did not provide you with proper grammar?  How did you get
 through school?  It is very apparent that your signature is both
improper and
 just plain *wrong.*  Any reference citation book, whether it be "The
Chicago

"Any reference citation..." [redundant, choose one or the other]

 Manual of Style" or "Publication Manual of the American Psychological
 Association" states you use one or the other, not *both.*  If you
never
 used this throughout your advanced education, than common sense
certainly
 should have.  A proper signature line is as basic as verb tenses.

"than..."   [correct spelling: then]
"common sense certainly should have." [inappropriate personification.
"common sense" does not "do" things]

 It amazes me that you do not know this, and it appears that your peers
do
 know it.  I sure hope you had work oral instead of written work, as it

"work oral..."  [word order]

 seems you cannot identify your own proper signature block., as
indicated
 above, you ego with your 3.8 average seems to get in the way. I find
it

"block., as..." [punctuation, capitalisation: end sentence "block.",
begin new: As..."]

 humorous that you must tell this list what your deeds and grades were,
as
 well as explaining "what the letters mean."   We do not care, and
since my

"care, and since..." [again, punctuation, capitalisation: end sentence
"care.", begin new: "Since"]

 wife and I both have 4.0 PhDs, I really do not think we can "learn
 something" from you.   You assume too much, or perhaps think too
little of
 the people on this group.   BTW doc, your "theoryetical" is
misspelled.

 At least learn the proper way to identify yourself in public writing.

 Gary (I do not need an ego booster)



 
__
Vous avez un site perso ?
2 millions de francs à gagner sur i(france) !
Webmasters : ZE CONCOURS ! http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/concours.emailif





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Daniel Baker

It turns out that I am downloading it at this very minute to find out. :) I
am going to install on a seperate machine of course, just in case MS
Boobytrapped it. :)

Dan.

- Original Message -
From: Greg Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] IE5 for linux


I believe, if you are good enough at hacking the install, you may be able to
pull off using IE5 in linux from the Solaris/HP-UX source. I don't know the
diffrences, but if all it takes is getting a few libraries, and creating
symlinks to the correct files, I don't see why it shouldn't work.

Of course, it may turn out that I have no idea what I'm talking about.

--Greg

- Original Message -
From: "Joe Tux" [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 welcome to the club!

 I'm suffering the same thing with Netscape 4.74 (even prior to upgrade).
The
 same thing happened when I browse to a Flash-enabled website 'though I've
 installed Flash plug-in :/


 Joe
 #186063

 file://-Original Message-
 file://Someone posted a comment that IE5.5 was available for UNIX at
 file://ftp.microsoft.com and that they were using it. After searching
through
 file://their ftp site I find IE5 for Solaris and HP-UX only, any one
 file://have anything
 file://on this. I hate to admit it but IE is much better than NS4xx or NS6
(at
 file://least it doesn't lock my system while browsing java pages).
 file://Using NS 4.74 at present..
 file://TIA,
 // --
 file://Ken Thompson  WA7SYR




__
Vous avez un site perso ?
2 millions de francs à gagner sur i(france) !
Webmasters : ZE CONCOURS ! http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/concours.emailif










 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread Benjamin Reed

Quick!  Somebody mention Hitler so this thread can end officially by the
rules of Usenet!

Oop, I did it.

--
Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://defiance.dyndns.org/ / http://radio.scenespot.org/
Now playing on Defiance Radio: Spooky by New Order




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Pointer Problems

2000-09-10 Thread Larry Blodgett

Here is a strange problem.  I just installed Mandrake 7.1 on a new 
machine.  And when I run KDE or Gnome, I get a white box about 1/2 by 
1/2 inch on my 15 inch monitor screen.  It seems I don't have the 
actual pointer icon.  The upper left hand corner of the white square 
seems to function the same as the end of the pointer.

I have now installed several distros and they all exhibit the same 
perplexing problem.  It is getting scary, I am contemplating putting 
my W98 drive in the drive bay just to check the pointer (I told you 
it was getting scary).

Could this be a mother board problem? (Gigabyte Duron board)


Anyone out there know how I can get a pointer?
-- 
Thanks,

Larry Blodgett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread MailListReader

Let us know how it goes!

On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Daniel Baker wrote:

 It turns out that I am downloading it at this very minute to find out. :) I
 am going to install on a seperate machine of course, just in case MS
 Boobytrapped it. :)
 
 Dan.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Greg Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 12:50 PM
 Subject: Re: [expert] IE5 for linux
 
 
 I believe, if you are good enough at hacking the install, you may be able to
 pull off using IE5 in linux from the Solaris/HP-UX source. I don't know the
 diffrences, but if all it takes is getting a few libraries, and creating
 symlinks to the correct files, I don't see why it shouldn't work.
 
 Of course, it may turn out that I have no idea what I'm talking about.
 
 --Greg
 
 - Original Message -
 From: "Joe Tux" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  welcome to the club!
 
  I'm suffering the same thing with Netscape 4.74 (even prior to upgrade).
 The
  same thing happened when I browse to a Flash-enabled website 'though I've
  installed Flash plug-in :/
 
 
  Joe
  #186063
 
  file://-Original Message-
  file://Someone posted a comment that IE5.5 was available for UNIX at
  file://ftp.microsoft.com and that they were using it. After searching
 through
  file://their ftp site I find IE5 for Solaris and HP-UX only, any one
  file://have anything
  file://on this. I hate to admit it but IE is much better than NS4xx or NS6
 (at
  file://least it doesn't lock my system while browsing java pages).
  file://Using NS 4.74 at present..
  file://TIA,
  // --
  file://Ken Thompson  WA7SYR
 
 
 
 
 __
 Vous avez un site perso ?
 2 millions de francs à gagner sur i(france) !
 Webmasters : ZE CONCOURS ! http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/concours.emailif
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
  Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
 
 
 
 

-- 
****
Nick Webb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Hoyt


- Original Message -
From: "Greg Stewart" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] IE5 for linux


 I believe, if you are good enough at hacking the install, you may be able
to
 pull off using IE5 in linux from the Solaris/HP-UX source. I don't know
the
 diffrences, but if all it takes is getting a few libraries, and creating
 symlinks to the correct files, I don't see why it shouldn't work.

 Of course, it may turn out that I have no idea what I'm talking about.


IIRC, the Solaris port is a binary-only offering. I doubt that there are
libraries available to run native Solaris apps on Linux. One could always
run Solaris just to use IE, but it's easier to use a product like Win4Lin to
accomplish essentially the same thing. That's what I do.

Hoyt





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Tyler Longren

Greg,

I believe you're right.  I've heard of people getting IE 5 for Unix to work
before.  I'm not sure if they were using WINE or not though.

Tyler


- Original Message -
From: "Greg Stewart" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] IE5 for linux


 I believe, if you are good enough at hacking the install, you may be able
to
 pull off using IE5 in linux from the Solaris/HP-UX source. I don't know
the
 diffrences, but if all it takes is getting a few libraries, and creating
 symlinks to the correct files, I don't see why it shouldn't work.

 Of course, it may turn out that I have no idea what I'm talking about.

 --Greg

 - Original Message -
 From: "Joe Tux" [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  welcome to the club!
 
  I'm suffering the same thing with Netscape 4.74 (even prior to upgrade).
 The
  same thing happened when I browse to a Flash-enabled website 'though
I've
  installed Flash plug-in :/
 
 
  Joe
  #186063
 
  //-Original Message-
  //Someone posted a comment that IE5.5 was available for UNIX at
  //ftp.microsoft.com and that they were using it. After searching through
  //their ftp site I find IE5 for Solaris and HP-UX only, any one
  //have anything
  //on this. I hate to admit it but IE is much better than NS4xx or NS6
(at
  //least it doesn't lock my system while browsing java pages).
  //Using NS 4.74 at present..
  //TIA,
  // --
  //Ken Thompson  WA7SYR
 




__
 Vous avez un site perso ?
 2 millions de francs à gagner sur i(france) !
 Webmasters : ZE CONCOURS ! http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/concours.emailif










 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Greg Stewart

 "just in case MS Boobytrapped it. :)"

Paranoid!  I like that!  :-)

--Greg


 It turns out that I am downloading it at this very minute to find out. :)
I
 am going to install on a seperate machine of course, just in case MS
 Boobytrapped it. :)

 Dan.

 - Original Message -
 From: Greg Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I believe, if you are good enough at hacking the install, you may be able
to
 pull off using IE5 in linux from the Solaris/HP-UX source. I don't know
the
 diffrences, but if all it takes is getting a few libraries, and creating
 symlinks to the correct files, I don't see why it shouldn't work.

 Of course, it may turn out that I have no idea what I'm talking about.

 --Greg

 - Original Message -
 From: "Joe Tux" [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  welcome to the club!
 
  I'm suffering the same thing with Netscape 4.74 (even prior to upgrade).
 The
  same thing happened when I browse to a Flash-enabled website 'though
I've
  installed Flash plug-in :/
 
 
  Joe
  #186063
 
  file://-Original Message-
  file://Someone posted a comment that IE5.5 was available for UNIX at
  file://ftp.microsoft.com and that they were using it. After searching
 through
  file://their ftp site I find IE5 for Solaris and HP-UX only, any one
  file://have anything
  file://on this. I hate to admit it but IE is much better than NS4xx or
NS6
 (at
  file://least it doesn't lock my system while browsing java pages).
  file://Using NS 4.74 at present..
  file://TIA,
  // --
  file://Ken Thompson  WA7SYR
 




 __
 Vous avez un site perso ?
 2 millions de francs à gagner sur i(france) !
 Webmasters : ZE CONCOURS ! http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/concours.emailif






 --
--
 


  Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
  Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
 









 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.


 
__
Vous avez un site perso ?
2 millions de francs à gagner sur i(france) !
Webmasters : ZE CONCOURS ! http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/concours.emailif





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Benjamin Reed

 I believe, if you are good enough at hacking the install, you may be
 able to pull off using IE5 in linux from the Solaris/HP-UX source. I
 don't know the diffrences, but if all it takes is getting a few
 libraries, and creating symlinks to the correct files, I don't see
 why it shouldn't work.

 Of course, it may turn out that I have no idea what I'm talking
 about.

You mean they give out IE5 source, and not just binaries for solaris and
HPUX??

If not, it won't work in linux unless either they have solaris-x86 binaries
(which you could get working with ibcs), or you're running linux on PA-RISC
or SPARC, and you use the OS compatibility stuff.  Or, you have an emulator,
and I don't think there are any...

The Sparc and HP-UX (PA-RISC) chip architectures are fundamentally different
than Intel/AMD/etc. processors.  Regardless of OS, binaries from other
architectures won't work without emulation.

--
Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://defiance.dyndns.org/ / http://radio.scenespot.org/
Now playing on Defiance Radio: Burn by The Cure





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Upgrading to 7.1 from 6.0

2000-09-10 Thread David Blair

I have a reasonably stable and useful install of Mandrake-Linux 6.0, but I'd
like to move up to 7.1. 

However, I'm concerned it won't be a very easy thing to do, and I'd rather
not have to do a mass-reinstall of all my software.

What say ye, fellow list members? How bad is the upgrade process going to be
for me? Is it worth the effort? Is it worth the effort even if I have to
reinstall everything?

Thanks



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Austin L. Denyer



  "just in case MS Boobytrapped it. :)"
 
 Paranoid!  I like that!  :-)

Hey, where Micro$oft are concerned, one cannot be too careful...

It would be a great example of FUD at work...

#;-D

Regards,
Ozz.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



RE: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread Abe

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!


Thanks for the laugh.


= Original Message From "Benjamin Reed" [EMAIL PROTECTED] =
Quick!  Somebody mention Hitler so this thread can end officially by the
rules of Usenet!

Oop, I did it.

--
Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://defiance.dyndns.org/ / http://radio.scenespot.org/
Now playing on Defiance Radio: Spooky by New Order

Jesus saves,
Allah forgives, 
Chthulu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Upgrading to 7.1 from 6.0

2000-09-10 Thread Tyler Longren

Give it a shot.  the worst part of it all is waiting for the packages to
install.  It took a LONG time to do on my box.

Tyler


- Original Message -
From: "David Blair" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 1:47 PM
Subject: [expert] Upgrading to 7.1 from 6.0


 I have a reasonably stable and useful install of Mandrake-Linux 6.0, but
I'd
 like to move up to 7.1.

 However, I'm concerned it won't be a very easy thing to do, and I'd rather
 not have to do a mass-reinstall of all my software.

 What say ye, fellow list members? How bad is the upgrade process going to
be
 for me? Is it worth the effort? Is it worth the effort even if I have to
 reinstall everything?

 Thanks








 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Pointer Problems

2000-09-10 Thread Greg Stewart

What kind of mouse is it? Is it not recognised correctly? Or, are you
actually selecting the kind of mouse you have during install, and it turns
out that linux really wants to drive it as something different?

--Greg

- Original Message -
From: "Larry Blodgett" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Here is a strange problem.  I just installed Mandrake 7.1 on a new
 machine.  And when I run KDE or Gnome, I get a white box about 1/2 by
 1/2 inch on my 15 inch monitor screen.  It seems I don't have the
 actual pointer icon.  The upper left hand corner of the white square
 seems to function the same as the end of the pointer.

 I have now installed several distros and they all exhibit the same
 perplexing problem.  It is getting scary, I am contemplating putting
 my W98 drive in the drive bay just to check the pointer (I told you
 it was getting scary).

 Could this be a mother board problem? (Gigabyte Duron board)


 Anyone out there know how I can get a pointer?
 --
 Thanks,

 Larry Blodgett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])




 
__
Vous avez un site perso ?
2 millions de francs à gagner sur i(france) !
Webmasters : ZE CONCOURS ! http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/concours.emailif





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Pointer Problems

2000-09-10 Thread Oliver L. Plaine Jr.

On Sun, 10 Sep 2000 18:03:29 -0400, Larry wrote:

 I have now installed several distros and they all exhibit the same
 perplexing problem.  It is getting scary, I am contemplating putting
 my W98 drive in the drive bay just to check the pointer (I told you
 it was getting scary).

--
Sun, 10 Sep 2000  18:30:29

No Larry, you won't have to do anything that drastic 8-)...The pointer
turning into a big white block is a common problem. that I have seen
many times on the list. there is a howto written to fix this but not
ever having the problem myself I did not look into it..

Try searching around on the mandrake user .org site for the
howtoor search the mail list archives.

Olly P
Biloxi
Mississippi



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] DHCP server not responding?

2000-09-10 Thread Benjamin Reed

 Did he change his network card in the server and is the correct MAC
address
 for it and is it entered properly?

 (normally I would expect each segment of the MAC address to be two
digits.)

Well, we're not certain why, but the Windows solution (reboot) fixed it.
And the single-digit MAC address format is what was used in the dhcpd.conf
man page, so that's what we used.  :)

--
Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://defiance.dyndns.org/ / http://radio.scenespot.org/
Now playing on Defiance Radio: Violently Happy by Bjork





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] OT: w98 equiv to this list

2000-09-10 Thread arsaidac

You have 2 choices:
1:Symantec's Ghost's 6.x
2:Partition Magic 5.x

Stefan Srdic wrote:
 
 Doug McGarrett wrote:
 
  Does anyone here know of a Windows 98 equivalent to
  this mailing list?  I need one question answered, but
  if someone here was willing to do so, I'd be very happy
  not to have to mess with a Windows list.
 
  Question:  I'm converting from an all-SCSI system to a
  hybrid that will have an IDE hard drive.  (I can't fight
  the prices any more!)  Is there any way that I can convert
  what is presently on the SCSI drive to the new system,
  without reloading the OS and all the apps from scratch.
  I'd like not to have to reload WP, AutoCad, etc., especially
  since some are upgrades, and would require 2 or 3 earlier
  programs to be installed first, for no reason except to
  permit the upgrade to install.
  (Yes I know I can copy the _data_ files from WordPerfect,
  AutoCad, etc.)
 
  New machine will have SCSI--different card--but could have
  old card for a little while, or forever, for that matter.
  New machine will have "old" SCSI format, just enough to
  isolate cd-r from rest of system, for example.  SCSI-2.
  Also to allow JAZ drives to plug in and work.
 
  Of course, the humongous drive will have Linux on it, right
  after W98, which _insists_ on being first.  Any caveats
  there are welcome.
 
  Please copy replies to the list. I'm probably one of few
  but not alone with this kind of question.
 
  BTW, this is a great list.  I don't read everything, since
  I have a life to live, but there is a whole heck of a lot of
  expertise here!
 
  TIA for any help I get.  --doug
 

  Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
  Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
 
 Goto www.tweakfiles.com and download Norton Ghost, or go directly to
 Synmatec''s web site and download the demo version of Norton Ghost. Norton
 Ghost will copy partitions from one computer to another, or even from one
 networked workstation to another. The only downfall of this program is that
 in order for it to work correctly the partitions that are being dealt with
 need to be approx. the same size.
 
 I can answer any other of your questions on the www.Speedcorp.net Windows
 forum!!
 
 Stef
 
   
 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

begin:vcard 
n:Saidac;Adrian
tel;home:216-381-5774
tel;work:440-646-3654
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Rockwell Automation;ITS
adr:;;1 Allen Bradley Dr.;Cleveland;Ohio;44124;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Sr. System analyst
fn:arsaidac
end:vcard


Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] pcmcaia-10/100 ethernet card

2000-09-10 Thread root

Hi,

I bought a Kingmax ken0100-a-1.41 10/100 ethernet PCMCIA card. It had
Linux compatible on the back of the box. To my surprise only been tested
on RedHat 5.2  6.0 and SuSe and so after following all instructions the
'make' file has not worked once.

I have recompiled the kernel to PCMCIA format, installed the latest
PCMCIA package 'pcmcia-cs-3.1.20' and modified the 'make' file to the
kernel version and PCMSRC path but every time it comes up with the
error:
.
/usr/include/linux/coda.h:261: storage time of 'va_atime' isn't known
/usr/include/linux/coda.h:262: storage time of 'va_atime' isn't known
/usr/include/linux/coda.h:263: storage time of 'va_atime' isn't known
/usr/include/linux/coda.h:563: storage time of 'attr' isn't known
/usr/include/linux/fs.h:433: storage time of 'f_owner' isn't known
/usr/include/linux/sched.h:288: storage time of 'times' isn't known
make: *** [pcnet_cs.o] Error 1

I have also tried pre-compiled PCMCIA packages, as well but they are not
working. The best I can get is the NE2000 Ethernet Compatible card to
ping myself at good speed, other computers at terrible speed, but no one
can ping me.

Does anyone know what these time problems are and what I need to do to
fix them.

Thankyou,

Simon Robertson



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



RE: [expert] autofs and direct maps

2000-09-10 Thread Schroeder, Brian

Sorry I haven't replied sooner, I have been on leave for a while.

I can't find a direct claim that "linux doesn't support direct maps",
anywhere (although I seem to recall seeing it somewhere...).  But I
know I spent some time trying to make it work without success.  And,
the autofs documentation that comes with LM7.1 explicitly does NOT
say anything at all about direct maps.  Also, the man page for
automount does say that the map format is a "subset of the Sun
automounter map format" - ie. it does not do everything.

Brian.

-Original Message-
From: Lou Baccari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 6:51 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [expert] autofs and direct maps




Brian,

 Thanks for the reply,  it looks like you are the only one whos answered.
Do you know if there is any documentation on the net to support your
statement of 'linux doesn't support direct maps'?

Thanks again for the help...

Lou


-Original Message-
From: Schroeder, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 8:44 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [expert] autofs and direct maps


Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that autofs under
linux doesn't support direct maps.

Brian.

-Original Message-
From: Lou Baccari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 11:50 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [expert] autofs and direct maps



I'm trying to get autofs to map to the name of a direct map
'/var/spool/mail',  can the following files,
auto.master and autro.direct work?  These files are used successfully with
Compaq's Tru64 Unix.

Thanks,

Lou.

/etc/auto.master:
-

# mount-point   mapname mount-options
/-  /etc/auto.direct-rw,soft,intr
/corsair/etc/auto.corsair   -rw,soft,intr


/etc/auto.direct:
-

# key   mount-options   remote-location
/var/spool/mail quabbin:/usr/spool/mail




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Pointer Problems

2000-09-10 Thread Tony McGee



It's a problem with your video card, XFree86 is trying to display a cursor
using hardware routines but something isn't going well. As root, edit your
/etc/X11/XF86Config file and scroll down to the section named "Device" and
you'll see a few lines that start with `#Option`. It's easy to find because
there's a comment that says "uncomment this line if you see a big white block
instead of a cursor!". 

You need to remove the # character from the line that says `#Option
"sw_cursor"`, save, then restart X. This should bring your pointer back by
using software drawing routines. It's probably a little bit slower than a
hardware cursor but not greatly so.

Tony

On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Larry Blodgett pushed some tiny letters in this order:
 
 Here is a strange problem.  I just installed Mandrake 7.1 on a new 
 machine.  And when I run KDE or Gnome, I get a white box about 1/2 by 
 1/2 inch on my 15 inch monitor screen.  It seems I don't have the 
 actual pointer icon.  The upper left hand corner of the white square 
 seems to function the same as the end of the pointer.
 




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



RE: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Mike Tracy Holt

Yup - that's all there is.  I'm currently using IE5.5 and Outlook 2000 (on
win2k) which don't have near the problems of Netscape.  I would love to see
a port to linux (any hackers out there?)

Mike


Someone posted a comment that IE5.5 was available for UNIX at
ftp.microsoft.com and that they were using it. After searching through
their ftp site I find IE5 for Solaris and HP-UX only, any one have anything
on this. I hate to admit it but IE is much better than NS4xx or NS6 (at
least it doesn't lock my system while browsing java pages).
Using NS 4.74 at present..
TIA,
 --
Ken Thompson  WA7SYR
Electrocom Computer Services Payette, Idaho 83661
1-888-642-7101 Sales - Services - Repair
Web: http://www,nwaa.com
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #183936
Driver Petition sig.  # 00063954






Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread john bodanske

I've used it under VMWare! hahaha, at a time when my windows partition
wouldn't even boot!
- Original Message -
From: "Hoyt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] IE5 for linux



 - Original Message -
 From: "Ralph" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 2:47 PM
 Subject: RE: [expert] IE5 for linux


  You won't see ie5 for linux there is for unix but no port for linux
  Gates hasent lost his mind yet!!
 
 

 Kind of useable under WINE, but I've never gotten it to work.

 Hoyt












 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] well now i have a new problem and it sucks

2000-09-10 Thread Mwinold

after trying to find problems with my linux xf86config file and discovering a 
poor install such as very few if any utilitys could be found i figured i 
havent done much with the system and simply formatted my linux partition and 
reloaded linux, well i figured i had a successful install i managed to play 
with the various settings and even found a theme that was made with the 
laptop user in mind, well i decided i needed to figure out tar files because 
my computer needs a particular set of files or i cant run it too long due to 
the fan not running, so i tried to reboot, linux unloaded no problem.
 restarted the computer 
 try to load windows well it decides it doesnt want to start and 
automatically throws me into the starting point again so i run scan disk and 
defrag in safemode and then reboot
 
 grub starts to load, next thing i know, i see
 
 grub)_
 press tab for available options
 
 this disturbed me
 so i type linux
 
 command not found
 
 TYPED windows
 command not found
 so i press tab
 i get a set of options including boot
 ok typed boot
 linux starts to load and then it gets down to kernel panic! 
 system stops
 ctrl alt del
 reboot the system
 i try my boot disk wich i made right after i installed linux, (fianlly after 
having linux for 3 weeks)
 it starts to load linux 
 kernel panic!
 ok lets try to use the recover feature
 dont know what it was trying to do i guess load a modified version of linux 
well it crashed
 must be a bad boot disk ontop of something wrong with linux, aparently 
copied over when i made the boot disk
 
 so i get the install disk and use the recover feature
 it worked now i have
 [$recover@root$]
 ok lets try fdisk
 hda5 aparently is larger then it was partitioned for
 i finally using maximum linux magazine used the windows boot disk to restore 
the booting procedure but this means i cant boot into linux, should i try and 
install 
 lilo or osxboot or something, but what about the kernel is that just totally 
jacked up, i need some serious help, and i shouldnt keep formatting and 
reinstalling linux thats killing my disk space given that every format kills 
sets of blocks 



In a message dated 10-Sep-00 18:36:15 Central Daylight Time, Mwinold writes:

 after trying to find problems with my linux xf86config file and 
discovering a poor install such as very few if any utilitys could be found i 
figured i havent done much with the system and simply formatted my linux 
partition and reloaded linux, well i figured i had a successful install i 
managed to play with the various settings and even found a theme that was 
made with the laptop user in mind, well i decided i needed to figure out tar 
files because my computer needs a particular set of files or i cant run it 
too long due to the fan not running, so i tried to reboot, linux unloaded no 
problem.
 restarted the computer 
 try to load windows well it decides it doesnt want to start and 
automatically throws me into the starting point again so i run scan disk and 
defrag in safemode and then reboot
 
 grub starts to load, next thing i know, i see
 
 grub)_
 press tab for available options
 
 this disturbed me
 so i type linux
 
 command not found
 
 TYPED windows
 command not found
 so i press tab
 i get a set of options including boot
 ok typed boot
 linux starts to load and then it gets down to kernel panic! 
 system stops
 ctrl alt del
 reboot the system
 i try my boot disk wich i made right after i installed linux, (fianlly after 
having linux for 3 weeks)
 it starts to load linux 
 kernel panic!
 ok lets try to use the recover feature
 dont know what it was trying to do i guess load a modified version of linux 
well it crashed
 must be a bad boot disk ontop of something wrong with linux, aparently 
copied over when i made the boot disk
 
 so i get the install disk and use the recover feature
 it worked now i have
 [$recover@root$]
 ok lets try fdisk
 hda5 aparently is larger then it was partitioned for
 i finally using maximum linux magazine used the windows boot disk to restore 
the booting procedure but this means i cant boot into linux, should i try and 
install 
 lilo or osxboot or something, but what about the kernel is that just totally 
jacked up, i need some serious help, and i shouldnt keep formatting and 
reinstalling linux thats killing my disk space given that every format kills 
sets of blocks 




after trying to find problems with my linux xf86config file and discovering a 
poor install such as very few if any utilitys could be found i figured i 
havent done much with the system and simply formatted my linux partition and 
reloaded linux, well i figured i had a successful install i managed to play 
with the various settings and even found a theme that was made with the 
laptop user in mind, well i decided i needed to figure out tar files because 
my computer needs a particular set of files or i cant run it too long due to 
the fan not running, so i tried to reboot, linux unloaded no problem.

Re: [expert] IE5 for linux

2000-09-10 Thread Mwinold

i wonder if you can do that with a win modem??? wich would be awesome, less 
crap to buy



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Pointer Problems

2000-09-10 Thread john bodanske

You might try editing the X config file for the cursor under the mouse
section or the video driver section : I can't remember, and I'm at a MS
machine now.  Anyway, there's a switch for this problem, although I've never
encountered it.
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Oliver L. Plaine Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Pointer Problems


On Sun, 10 Sep 2000 18:03:29 -0400, Larry wrote:

 I have now installed several distros and they all exhibit the same
 perplexing problem.  It is getting scary, I am contemplating putting
 my W98 drive in the drive bay just to check the pointer (I told you
 it was getting scary).

--
Sun, 10 Sep 2000  18:30:29

No Larry, you won't have to do anything that drastic 8-)...The pointer
turning into a big white block is a common problem. that I have seen
many times on the list. there is a howto written to fix this but not
ever having the problem myself I did not look into it..

Try searching around on the mandrake user .org site for the
howtoor search the mail list archives.

Olly P
Biloxi
Mississippi








 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] well now i have a new problem and it sucks

2000-09-10 Thread Mage Grimau

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 after trying to find problems with my linux xf86config file and discovering a
 poor install such as very few if any utilitys could be found i figured i
 havent done much with the system and simply formatted my linux partition and
 reloaded linux, well i figured i had a successful install i managed to play
 with the various settings and even found a theme that was made with the
 laptop user in mind, well i decided i needed to figure out tar files because
 my computer needs a particular set of files or i cant run it too long due to
 the fan not running, so i tried to reboot, linux unloaded no problem.
  restarted the computer
  try to load windows well it decides it doesnt want to start and
 automatically throws me into the starting point again so i run scan disk and
 defrag in safemode and then reboot
 
  grub starts to load, next thing i know, i see
 
  grub)_
  press tab for available options
 
  this disturbed me
  so i type linux
 
  command not found
 
  TYPED windows
  command not found
  so i press tab
  i get a set of options including boot
  ok typed boot
  linux starts to load and then it gets down to kernel panic!
  system stops
  ctrl alt del
  reboot the system
  i try my boot disk wich i made right after i installed linux, (fianlly after
 having linux for 3 weeks)
  it starts to load linux
  kernel panic!
  ok lets try to use the recover feature
  dont know what it was trying to do i guess load a modified version of linux
 well it crashed
  must be a bad boot disk ontop of something wrong with linux, aparently
 copied over when i made the boot disk
 
  so i get the install disk and use the recover feature
  it worked now i have
  [$recover@root$]
  ok lets try fdisk
  hda5 aparently is larger then it was partitioned for
  i finally using maximum linux magazine used the windows boot disk to restore
 the booting procedure but this means i cant boot into linux, should i try and
 install
  lilo or osxboot or something, but what about the kernel is that just totally
 jacked up, i need some serious help, and i shouldnt keep formatting and
 reinstalling linux thats killing my disk space given that every format kills
 sets of blocks
 
   
 
 Subject: Fwd: well now i have a new problem and it sucks
 Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 23:10:57 EDT
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 In a message dated 10-Sep-00 18:36:15 Central Daylight Time, Mwinold writes:
 
  after trying to find problems with my linux xf86config file and
 discovering a poor install such as very few if any utilitys could be found i
 figured i havent done much with the system and simply formatted my linux
 partition and reloaded linux, well i figured i had a successful install i
 managed to play with the various settings and even found a theme that was
 made with the laptop user in mind, well i decided i needed to figure out tar
 files because my computer needs a particular set of files or i cant run it
 too long due to the fan not running, so i tried to reboot, linux unloaded no
 problem.
  restarted the computer
  try to load windows well it decides it doesnt want to start and
 automatically throws me into the starting point again so i run scan disk and
 defrag in safemode and then reboot
 
  grub starts to load, next thing i know, i see
 
  grub)_
  press tab for available options
 
  this disturbed me
  so i type linux
 
  command not found
 
  TYPED windows
  command not found
  so i press tab
  i get a set of options including boot
  ok typed boot
  linux starts to load and then it gets down to kernel panic!
  system stops
  ctrl alt del
  reboot the system
  i try my boot disk wich i made right after i installed linux, (fianlly after
 having linux for 3 weeks)
  it starts to load linux
  kernel panic!
  ok lets try to use the recover feature
  dont know what it was trying to do i guess load a modified version of linux
 well it crashed
  must be a bad boot disk ontop of something wrong with linux, aparently
 copied over when i made the boot disk
 
  so i get the install disk and use the recover feature
  it worked now i have
  [$recover@root$]
  ok lets try fdisk
  hda5 aparently is larger then it was partitioned for
  i finally using maximum linux magazine used the windows boot disk to restore
 the booting procedure but this means i cant boot into linux, should i try and
 install
  lilo or osxboot or something, but what about the kernel is that just totally
 jacked up, i need some serious help, and i shouldnt keep formatting and
 reinstalling linux thats killing my disk space given that every format kills
 sets of blocks 
 
   
 
 Subject: well now i have a new problem and it sucks
 Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 19:36:15 EDT
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 after trying to find problems with my linux xf86config file and discovering a
 poor 

Re: [expert] well now i have a new problem and it sucks

2000-09-10 Thread Mwinold

formatting eventually causes sectors to go bad any manufacturer of a hard 
drive will tell you that granted its not a whole lot maybe a few bytes worth 
but id like to find another way to resolve this problem with a corrupted 
kernel



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



RE: [expert] are you so insecure

2000-09-10 Thread Gabi Davar


   Dr-PhD To the cooker and expert list;   Are you people 
 so insecure
[...]

Troll.

People, try to focus :-)

-Gabi



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] [Fwd: canon bj200 printer woes Mandrake 7.2 beta]

2000-09-10 Thread frank

On Thu, 07 Sep 2000, stuartsimpson wrote:



 I am currently having problems printing with my canon bj200.

i've the same printer and it's now working fine, so take hope...the printer 
selection list that was unavailable on install can be reached through 
drakconfan icon on the desktop gets you to it, and you ought be in root 
to use it...a printer configuration option is available there, and the full 
list of printers from which to select appears for you...

hope that helps

frank
-



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert]

2000-09-10 Thread John Hawk

What is the last line of  "ifup" in sbin.
It got trimed on fsck somehow I know it dosent end with
"ifup-p"   I'm not on the list so repy direct please

 
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.