RE: [expert] fast mirror

2003-03-29 Thread Scott Walker
I have also set one up in south Florida

ftp.unspeakable.org/pub/Mandrake-iso

Has 9.1 ISO's current.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Preston-Campbell
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 12:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] fast mirror

For anyone interested, I just downloaded 9.1 from a fast mirror in 
Denmark.  I did an MD5 checksum and everything is good.  Here is the 
location:
ns.sslug.dk/pub/mirror/mandrake/mandrake-9.1

Brian



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Questions on the upgrade path for mandrake.

2003-02-19 Thread Scott Walker
I am an avid debian user, as well as a linux user (since like 1991).

I'm curious as to the upgrade path mandrake gives. I know with debian
using there dselect/apt-get tools I can move from 1 realease to the next
very very easily.

How is the path from 9.0 to 9.1? Is it just a matter of selecting upgrade
and letting it do it's thing? Has anyone verified this? (I remeber when
redhat said you could do this, 4 server reinstalls later).



-- 
Scott Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Xfree86 4.0.2

2001-01-30 Thread Scott Walker



Has anyone upgraded there X in 7.2 to 4.0.2? Can you grab the RPMS from cooker
and use those?.






Re: [expert] kernel panic on 2.4.1-pre10 can't find root partition

2001-01-23 Thread Scott Walker



add a make install this will skip the step of you copy the stuff manually...





"David G.Powers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-23 03:45:55 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Scott Walker/MTL/BAM/ActiMedia)

Subject:  [expert] kernel panic on 2.4.1-pre10 can't find root partition



I am attempting to upgrade my kernel from 2.2.17 to 2.4.1-pre10 and I just
can't seem to get it right!  Please help!!!

-- Env --
Linux Mandrake 7.2
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 (kgcc)
ReiserFS 3.5.26 on all partitions (except swap!)
I can boot into 2.2.17 and the ReiserFS partitions mount with no problem

-- Steps --
untar...
make mrproper
make menuconfig
 Tried RieserFS as a module and as a built-in
make dep
make bzImage
make modules
make modules_install
copied System.map to /boot/System.map-2.4.1-pre10
copied arch/i386/boot/bzImage to /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.1-pre10
mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.4.1-pre10.img 2.4.1-pre10
added entries to /etc/lilo.conf
 image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.1-pre10
 label-linux-pre
 root=/dev/hda7
 initrd=/boot/initrd-2.4.1-pre10.img
 read-only
/sbin/lilo

everything went fine - no error messages ... until 

-- Results --
When I attempt to restart, I get a nasty message:
VFS: Cannon open root device "307" or 03:07
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel Panic: VFS: unable to mount root fs on 03:07

I booted back into 2.2.17 and took a look at /etc/fstab.  My "/" partition is
definitely on /dev/hda7

I tried 'rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.1-pre10` which returns:
Root device /dev/hda7

I tried setting the kernel root option an boot time; root=/dev/hda7 - no go!

Obviously I don't know what I'm doing.  Can someone please point me in a
direction!

Thanks,

DP





.






Re: [expert] cert#37843 Just Hacked - Hidden Directory!

2001-01-23 Thread Scott Walker



also have you patched your box.

I notice in your sig you say Sr Security & Network admin.

I think this knowledge was pretty common.. especially for a senior security
person...





pgeorges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-23 02:05:17 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Scott Walker/MTL/BAM/ActiMedia)

Subject:  Re: [expert] cert#37843 Just Hacked - Hidden Directory!






"Albert E. Whale" a écrit :

> I am curious exactly how do you create a dot directory (i.e. .puta) so
> that it is invisible to the ls -la command?

> Additionally, how do you run a process and eliminate it from the process
> table?

With a root kit that changes your commands in order not to display some
processes and files used for the crack.





.



Re: Re[2]: [expert] SCSI harddrive and LM 7.1

2001-01-11 Thread Scott Walker



Plus Fireball drives are not SCSI.





Rusty Carruth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-11 10:28:04 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Scott Walker/MTL/BAM/ActiMedia)

Subject:  Re[2]: [expert] SCSI harddrive and LM 7.1



"John J. LeMay Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ** Reply to message from "Zeljko Vukman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 11 Jan 2001
> 10:47:08 +0100
>
> > Hi Mandrakes,
> > I'm in a little trouble and I hope Mandrake experts could help here.
> > I admit, I never before used SCSI devices, and yesterday when I bought
> > a new computer I got a scsi harddrive quantum fireball 20 Gb. I have no
> > idea how to get it work with my Linux Mandrake 7.1. I tried all scsi
> > options
> > during install but no luck. Mandrake doesn't recognize it at all.
> > I presume that problem is in controler, and windows says that SCSI
> > controller is: Win 95-98 Promise Ultra100(tm) IDE Controler (PDC20265).
> > Is there any way to get it work?

um, hold on a minute.  Unless I read this wrong, a Promise Ultra100 IDE
controller
is NOT a scsi conroller, and will not work with a SCSI drive.

Like John said:

Does windows see the Quantum?

When you boot linux, what is detected (look at /var/log/messages or use
'dmesg' (which may or may not give the right info!))?

In windows, (I'm doing this from memory, so I may miss some parts or have
them in the wrong place, sorry!) start up the 'my computer' thingy, and
look at whats under the 'devices' tab.  Do you see anything in there that
says SCSI?If not, the problem is more basic than getting linux to
work with your SCSI, its a problem of getting scsi to work at all

rc


Rusty Carruth  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (480) 345-3621  SnailMail: Schlumberger ATE
FAX:   (480) 345-8793 7855 S. River Parkway, Suite 116
Ham: N7IKQ @ 146.82+,pl 162.2 Tempe, AZ 85284-1825





.






Re: [expert] ram issue

2001-01-09 Thread Scott Walker



You can look with your 'eyes' or use press control + w as indedicated on the
bottom pico editing menu.. but this goes back to the option with using you
'eyes'





"chronos ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 97-05-06 07:56:27 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Scott Walker/MTL/BAM/ActiMedia)

Subject:  [expert] ram issue



Hi all,
I am using mandrake 7.1 and I have 128 of ram.Problem is mandrake only sees 64
of my 128. I went to mandrakeuser.org and found the following. It says to edit
the following- /boot/grub/menu.1st as root and "find" the following- kernel
(hd0,5)/vmlinuz root=/dev/hda6 Then append mem=128 to the end of the line. So
then, how do I "find" the previous line ? I understand I can use pico to edit
the line and all that.I just dont know how to "find" the line I need.
   Thank you, Chronos.

_
Email your boss can't read - sign up for free disinfo.net email
at http://www.disinfo.com, your gateway to the underground





.






Re: [expert] Kernel problem with Mandrake 7.2

2000-12-05 Thread Scott Walker



First of all it's a known problem...

Second of all.. Seems mandrake doesn't have a fix, or a clue about it...





Paul Stear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/12/2000 02:24:56 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Scott Walker/MTL/BAM/ActiMedia)

Subject:  [expert] Kernel problem with Mandrake 7.2



Hi all,

I hope this mail message gets on the list ok.

I have been having problems installing Mandrake 7.2.
The boot from cdrom or floppy stops after the detection of hda.  It
seems that kernel 2.2.17 does not recognise my Promise Ultrs66
controller and the two disks attached to them.  This is proved by
removing the controller card, then 7.2 installes without error.  Another
indication is that if I install kernel 2.2.16 then the controller and
disks are recognised and all is well.
Why does this happen with a new release, one would think that 2.2.17
should be better than 2.2.16. Or is that whishfull thinking?

Can anybody help me solve this problem please?

Could anybody provide me with a complete set of disks from the site
please? I will pay all costs, I just can't afford to download them
though my modem.

I would also like all of the upgrades listed on the site for 7.2 as this
would take hours to download.

Thanks in anticipation, please contact me privately if you can provide
the cd's

regard
Paul






.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



RE: [expert] Why Mandrake install dosn't starts

2000-12-05 Thread Scott Walker



I had the same problem.. when I opened a bug report.. I was informed that it
wasn't their problem.. and closed the ticket... So I finally decided to go with
a distro that doesn't suck... I rolled my own..





Adam Many <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/12/2000 01:15:58 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:(bcc: Scott Walker/MTL/BAM/ActiMedia)

Subject:  RE: [expert] Why Mandrake install dosn't starts



I'm having a similar problem.  Mandrake 7.2 Install hangs after it identifies
the addresses and IRQs of IDE0 and
IDE1.  IDE0 has two harddrives.  IDE1 has a CD-ROM drive.  The addresses and
IRQs given for IDE0 and IDE1
are correct -- I checked in Windows.  This same setup worked fine in RH 6.0.

Many people seem to be having this problem, but the solutions offered so far
have not worked.

Thanks,
Adam

Original message from: Maximo Monsalvo
>Enter in mode single an remove the  parameters from the lilo of hd
>
>-Mensaje original-
>De: Vasif Ismailoglu MD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Enviado el: martes 5 de diciembre de 2000 12:22
>Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Asunto: [expert] Why Mandrake install dosn't starts
>
>
>Hello.
>I've a problem anout installing Mdk 7.2.
>First time I had this problem was with cooker. After
>burned cd from isp file. Now I've a tow cd's bought
>from GPL lisenzed Mdk 7.2 version. There are hundreds
>people installed system from these cd's.
>  Problem description:
>   Machine booting from cd. After there is appearing
>screen with f1 option and simply enter. When I'm
>pressing enter install starts. But after detection of
>hda and hdb it stops. I'm able to use ctrl-alt+del
>option. But it only reboots the comp.
>   I have not any problems with MDk 7.0 and 7.1. But
>it is like a nightmare with Mdk 7.2.
>   Thanks.
>  Sincerely
>
>__
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
>http://shopping.yahoo.com/
>
>
>




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Slow system

2000-11-29 Thread Scott Walker



And ideally you specifiy it in K

on my laptop for example it's append mem=" 130496k"

try that.





"J.A. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 29/11/2000 11:52:31 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Scott Walker/MTL/BAM/ActiMedia)

Subject:  Re: [expert] Slow system






Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno] said at ÒRe: [expert] Slow systemÓ.
[2000-11-29 17:36]

> On Wednesday 29 November 2000 16:02, you wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 November 2000 10:07 am, you wrote:
> > > > Installed Mandrake 7.2 on my friends computer (AMD Duron 700 with
> 256mb
> > >
> > > ram and a 30G 7200rpm ide disk), but everything seems to be going
> > > terribly slow. Recompiling the kernel took about 8 hours, running X
> and
> > > even the light wmanager blackbox runs terribly slow.
> >
> > It sounds like the kernel isn't using all your memory.  Check the output
> > of the free command and see how much memory the kernel thinks it has to
> > work with.  If its not the full 256 try adding mem-256M to the line you
> > enter at lilo to boot the kernel.  If this works, edit lilo.conf to
> > include append="mem=256M" in the options for the image.   This is what I
> > need to do for every box I have with over 128M of memory.
>
> hmm.. seems like that the kernel only thinks it has 64M ram, but adding
> append="mem=256M" to lilo just makes it freeze after bootup, had to
> remove

mmm would not your mobo have an i810 or i815 (or in general, it has an
on-board integrated VGA) ?
In that case, the last 1Mb of memory has to be reserved for the on board
VGA, so try with just mem=255M.




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





.


Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Use of "make oldconfig" while compiling a new kernel.

2000-11-24 Thread Scott Walker



vmlinuz = compressed with gzip
bzImage = compressed with bzip2 <- smallest foot print, but slower to load...





John Rye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 24/11/2000 09:43:40 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:    (bcc: Scott Walker/MTL/BAM/ActiMedia)

Subject:  Re: [expert] Use of "make oldconfig" while compiling a new  kernel.



Mark Weaver wrote:
>
> What is "mr proper"?
>
> Mark
>
> / * Sometimes it becomes necessary to rock the boat
>   * in order to get the rats up from below decks
>   * so they can be kicked over the side and drowned!
>   *
>   * REGISTERED LINUX USER # 182496
>   */
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<*REPLY SEPERATOR*>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 Scott Tyson had this to say!
>
> > *** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***
> >
> > On 11/20/2000 at 6:55 PM Andrew George scribbled:
> >
> > >Um...I think it's a little more complex than that (unless something changed
> > >in 7.2's kernel-source rpm)
> > >
> > >What I did was download the kernel srpm
> > >grab the config files out of that (forget where they are)
> > >copy the kernel config file of your choice to
> > >/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/defconfig
> > >make oldconfig
> >
> > This step right here is the same as make xconfig or make menuconfig.   It
just uses the old config file and only asks for new items.  Then follow the
normal make clean, mr proper, etc.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>   
> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

Seems Mark is asking the same ones I asked a while back on the Newbie
list.

May I add another?

What's the difference between 'vmlinuz' and 'bzImage' when it comes
to boot images?

Cheers


--
ICQ#: 89345394   Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected"
(The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972.)




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Getting two networks cards to work under the same module!

2000-11-15 Thread Scott Walker



How is it out of the question... You just said they were the same...

> I have eth0 set to 192.168.0.3 with a 24
> bit subnet mask (255.255.255.0) and eth1 set to 192.168.0.3 with a 24
> bit subnet mask so an IP addressing error is out of the question.






Stefan Srdic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 15/11/2000 09:41:23 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:    (bcc: Scott Walker/MTL/BAM/ActiMedia)

Subject:  Re: [expert] Getting two networks cards to work under the same module!



On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, you wrote:
>
> It seems to me that the original poster "must" use the "options"
> keyword in his /etc/modules.conf file because he is using
> an NE2000 (or compatible) ISA NIC card, which requires you to
> give address & IRQ information.
>
> I also have 2 NIC cards in my machine at home, but I only have
> 1 NE2000 compatible ISA NIC card (the other is a PCI non-NE2000).
>
> I would try:
>
> options eth0 io=0x300 irq=11
> options eth1 io=0x280 irq=10
>
> which should work since eth0 & eth1 are aliases (according to
> the man page for modules.conf).
>
> Good luck.
>
>
> Ron Heron wrote:
> >
> > Have you tried NOT using the options? if that doesn't
> > work, try placing the options lines after their
> > respective alias lines.
> >

Thanks for both of your replies, I attemped once again to set these
NICs up. I edited the conf.modules file to look like:

alias eth0 ne
alias eth0 ne
options eth0 ne-0 io=0x300 irq=11
options eth1 ne-1 io=0x280 irq=10

>From what I have read (ethernet HOW-TO, Modules.conf man pages) this
loads the module for each respective alias. After making these
ajusments I modprobed eth0 and modprode eth1 with no error messages!
Afterwards I restarted my network using the "/etc/rc.d/init.d/network
restart" command and received an error when bringing up interface eth1.

The ouput looks like this:

Shuting down interface eth0   [Ok]
Shuting down interface eth1   [Ok]
Disabling packet forwading[Ok]
Setting network parameters[Ok]
Bringing up interfeace lo  [Ok]
Bringing up interfeace eth0   [Ok]
Bringing up interfeace eth1 Delaying eth1 initialization
[Failed]

I have eth0 set to 192.168.0.3 with a 24
bit subnet mask (255.255.255.0) and eth1 set to 192.168.0.3 with a 24
bit subnet mask so an IP addressing error is out of the question.

Before I made these ajusments to the /etc/conf.modules file I used to
receive a "Device or resource busy" error when bringing up interface
eth1. We can almost rule out any hardware or firmware conflict now.
How can I take a look at my devices resources (IO's and IRQ's) and see
which modules are using them?

Thanks again for your help

Stef

www.speedcorp.net







Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Weirdness with installation

2000-11-03 Thread Scott Walker



HAs anyone had problems installing LM 7.2 on an IBM 300GL with a 20gb disk? It
seems to freeze on detecting the harddrive.. So I booted with a 7.1 CD and it
worked fine. So I used a 7.1 cdrom boot disk and the 7.2 CD... and it came up
fine.. but could not detect the hard-drive. Does anyone have any suggestion to
get around this?.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Adaptec 2940U2W and 'Drake 7.1

2000-06-07 Thread Scott Walker

Are you sure that your drives are terminated prorperly?

I have a AHA2940U2W and a Segate drive and have never had a problem


- Original Message - 
From: "John J. LeMay Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 10:02 PM
Subject: [expert] Adaptec 2940U2W and 'Drake 7.1


> Does anyone know if 7.1 has addressed the problem with the 2940U2W not being
> able to properly detect my Seagate LVD drives connected to my 2940U2W? This
> problem has kept my new PC acting as a doorstop for several weeks now while I've
> searched for an answer to this problem. I've tried installing 'Drake 6.1 and
> 7.0, however I cannot get beyond the SCSI detection phase without getting errors
> like:
> 
> scsi bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0
> scsi host 0 ch 0 reset pid 0 timed out - trying harder
> 
> I end up in a loop at this point. 
> 
> Help!
> 
> John LeMay Jr.
> Senior Enterprise Consultant
> NJMC, LLC.
> 
> Mandrake Linux 7.0 (2.2.14)  /  Polarbar Mailer 1.16c
> JDK 1.1.8 IBM build l118-2515
> 




[expert] Can't find..

2000-05-31 Thread Scott Walker

Is there a location for contributed software? I couldn't find any. And
supermount, Is there a place you can get the source from?

-- 
Scott Walker   Freedom Communications Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://freedom.rootserv.net

Court Room Quotes

Q:  Did he pick the dog up by the ears?
A:  No.
Q:  What was he doing with the dog's ears?
A:  Picking them up in the air.
Q:  Where was the dog at this time?
A:  Attached to the ears.




[expert] Couple of questions..

2000-05-16 Thread Scott Walker


Is there a supermount page soemwhere that I can grab the patch for the
kernel? Also, Is there a USB patch fro the kernel also?