[expert] Anti-Virus for Linux

2000-08-04 Thread Kikta LCpl Jason M

This may be a stupid question, but are there any anti-virus programs
avalible for Linux? I've looked but never found any and never seem to even
hear mention of any. Is it necessary? If not, why? Thanks.

Jason




Re: [expert] Anti-Virus for Linux

2000-08-04 Thread Deryk Barker

Thus spake Kikta LCpl Jason M ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

   This may be a stupid question, but are there any anti-virus programs
 avalible for Linux? I've looked but never found any and never seem to even
 hear mention of any. Is it necessary? If not, why? Thanks.

Viruses are *much* harder to write for properly written OSes, i.e
those in which there is protection for the boot sector, OS files etc.

In order to infect a linux system you'd basically have to be running
as root, which sensible people only do when absolutely necessary.

Given that currently the largest (and fastest-growing) group of
viruses are Word macro viruses, this is an excellent reason for
hoping that MS never port Word to linux, although even then you;d
probably only be able to infect your own userid.

Which is not to say that linux viruses are impossible, but there is
little incentive to produce one when you know that 99% of systems
would not get caught. And 99% of MS systems would...:-)

-- 
|Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept. | Music does not have to be understood|
|Camosun College, Victoria, BC, Canada| It has to be listened to.   |
|email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
|phone: +1 250 370 4452   | Hermann Scherchen.  |




Re: [expert] Anti-Virus for Linux

2000-08-04 Thread Charles Curley

On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 12:06:12PM -0400, Kikta LCpl Jason M wrote:
   This may be a stupid question, but are there any anti-virus programs
 avalible for Linux? I've looked but never found any and never seem to even
 hear mention of any. Is it necessary? If not, why? Thanks.

What do you mean by anti-virus?

If you mean, anti-Linux virus: as far as I know, very few if any Linux
viri have been found in the wild, and your best protection against them is
good security and good security habits.

If you mean, and anti-virus program that runs on Linux but scans for
Windows viri, Fsecure makes one. It is very useful for "staging" downloads
or in a Samba environment. It does not find trojans, though.

-- 

-- C^2

No windows were crashed in the making of this email.

Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley
 PGP signature


Re: [expert] Anti-Virus for Linux

2000-08-04 Thread Marc Handelman

Kikta LCpl Jason M wrote:

 This may be a stupid question, but are there any anti-virus programs
 avalible for Linux? I've looked but never found any and never seem to even
 hear mention of any. Is it necessary? If not, why? Thanks.

 Jason

Jason,

Try:http://linuxberg.linuxwired.net/conhtml/sys_scanners.html

Of course this is but one of many sites!!!


Regards




Re: [expert] Anti-Virus for Linux

2000-08-04 Thread LINUX_1

There is an AVP (Antiviral Toolkit Pro) antivirus version for linux.
You can visit www.avp.com for more information.

There is available a trial version from
ftp://ftp.avp.com/pub/avp30linux.tgz

Erramu.

   This may be a stupid question, but are there any anti-virus 
programs
 avalible for Linux? I've looked but never found any and never seem 
 to even
 hear mention of any. Is it necessary? If not, why? Thanks.
 
 Jason
 
 

 ___ 
Consigue tu e-mail gratuito TERRA.ES
 Haz click en http://www.terra.es/correo/




RE: [expert] Anti-Virus for Linux

2000-08-04 Thread Barry Smoke

amavis.org


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marc Handelman
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 11:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Anti-Virus for Linux


Kikta LCpl Jason M wrote:

 This may be a stupid question, but are there any anti-virus
programs
 avalible for Linux? I've looked but never found any and never seem to even
 hear mention of any. Is it necessary? If not, why? Thanks.

 Jason

Jason,

Try:http://linuxberg.linuxwired.net/conhtml/sys_scanners.html

Of course this is but one of many sites!!!


Regards





Re: [expert] Anti-Virus for Linux

2000-08-04 Thread Hoyt


- Original Message -
From: "Deryk Barker" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Anti-Virus for Linux


 Thus spake Kikta LCpl Jason M ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

  This may be a stupid question, but are there any anti-virus programs
 avalible for Linux? I've looked but never found any and never seem to
even
  hear mention of any. Is it necessary? If not, why? Thanks.

 Viruses are *much* harder to write for properly written OSes, i.e
 those in which there is protection for the boot sector, OS files etc.

 In order to infect a linux system you'd basically have to be running
 as root, which sensible people only do when absolutely necessary.

 Given that currently the largest (and fastest-growing) group of
 viruses are Word macro viruses, this is an excellent reason for
 hoping that MS never port Word to linux, although even then you;d
 probably only be able to infect your own userid.

 Which is not to say that linux viruses are impossible, but there is
 little incentive to produce one when you know that 99% of systems
 would not get caught. And 99% of MS systems would...:-)

 --

It's not a stupid question. It's just a confusing topic.

In a narrow sense, there is no known *nix virus "in the wild" although I
have heard of  some in "laboratory environments", whatever that means.

It seems more a matter of terminology and nit-picking over what the
definition of what a virus is.

There are root exploits for *nix systems and the system operator doesn't
have to be running as root at the time of "infection". Since root exploits
give the intruder root permissions, the compromised machine can launch
attacks against other machines or "root" them also and spread that way,
pretty much what Joe Public would call a virus.The average person would
perceive a root exploit as a "virus", just as they don't understand the
distinction between a "hacker" and a "cracker".

There are malicious programs that exist in the *nix world, but many seem to
only trash the users workspace and so are considered somehow OK to sysadmins
since the malicious programs don't bring the entire system down (the
individual  user would likely disagree about the importance, however).

Because of the way each OS is structured, the approach to attacks on MS
machines and *nix machines differ. MS exploits get more publicity because of
the much larger installed base. Because of the way the MS system is
designed, there seem to be many more opportunities to exploit them. Due to
their closed development, much more difficult to audit and fix.  Because
there are so many installed systems, it is more difficult to apply the fix
to them all. Because of the sheer numbers of installations, they are easier
and more desirable targets (bigger bang for the buck, so to speak).

There are virus scanning programs for *nix systems, IIRC, but they are
usually focused on scanning email for MS viruses so as to not further
propagate them. Yet, I have heard some sysadmins claim not to care about
propagating Windows viruses since "we don't use Windows".

As a regular *nix user, you should not need to be concerned about viruses,
just make certain you always back up important data. As the administrator of
your own system, you should be aware of system security to defend against
root exploits on your machine.

Hoyt






Re: [expert] Anti-Virus for Linux

2000-08-04 Thread Mike Tracy Holt

Best thing is don't run as root.  Other than that, go to www.linuxberg.com
and you can do a search for antivirus programs there.  There are some.

Mike


 This may be a stupid question, but are there any anti-virus programs
 avalible for Linux? I've looked but never found any and never seem to even
 hear mention of any. Is it necessary? If not, why? Thanks.

 Jason