Re: [expert] Well, damnit, XFree86-4.0.1 and rpm

2000-10-09 Thread Praedor Tempus

For some problems, it is difficult to pinpoint who may have
responsibility.
For kpackage problems, is it Mandrake for some mod they made to it?  Or
is
it a problem introduced into the original source from KDE.org?  

The same actually goes for my problems with XFree86.  It is maddening to
me
because, presumably, the source rpms that I have downloaded and tried to 
build are the very ones used by RedHat and Mandrake to produce their
i586 rpms.  

The Mandrake source rpm build dies on me with simply:

...
Processing files: XFree86-server-4.0.1-24mdk
Finding  Provides: (using /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides)...
Finding  Requires: (using /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires)...
Provides: gamma_dri.so i810_dri.so mga_dri.so r128_dri.so
Requires: XFree86 ld-linux.so.2 libc.so.6 libdl.so.2 libm.so.6
libGL.so.1 libICE.so.6 libSM.so.6 libvga.so.1 libX11.so.6 libXext.so.6
libXi.so.6 libXmu.so.6 libXt.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1)
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
Obsoletes: xserver-wrapper
Processing files: XFree86-glide-module-4.0.1-24mdk
File not found:
/var/tmp/XFree86-root/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glide_drv.o
Requires: XFree86-server = 4.0.1-24mdk
Processing files: XFree86-xfs-4.0.1-24mdk
Finding  Provides: (using /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides)...
Finding  Requires: (using /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires)...
PreReq: shadow-utils /bin/sh
Requires: initscripts >= 5.27-28mdk XFree86-libs = 4.0.1-24mdk
ld-linux.so.2 libc.so.6 libm.so.6 libX11.so.6 libXext.so.6 libXfont.so.1
/bin/sh libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
Obsoletes: xtt 

Nothing there.  I do have initscripts >= 5.27-28mdk on my system, and
this message
isn't really telling me I am missing it, just that that module/subset of
XFree86
requires that initscripts.  No error messages.  

The Redhat source rpm dies similarly, but at a slightly different point
in the
build process.  No error messages.  I am left wondering if there is a
problem
with the source rpm, with the rpm 3.0.5, or some subtle problem
elsewhere in my
system...which is actually nothing unusual or bizarre.  Basically a 7.1
installation
with updates.  It doesn't help that I cannot locate anything like a
config.log 
in any of the XFree86-4.x directories.  

praedor

root wrote:
> 
> How do you expect them to fix that problem when they can't even make
> kpackage work
> 
> mikey
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> user #83815
> 
> Praedor Tempus wrote:
> >
> > I really don't get this.  It happens on SOME src rpms but most are
> > fine.  What is the deal here?  I do an "rpm --rebuild" on XFree86-4.0.1
> > src.rpm using rpm-3.0.5-24mdk and the src builds but no rpms are
> > produced.  There are no error messages anywhere that I can find yet
[...]



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Well, damnit, XFree86-4.0.1 and rpm

2000-10-08 Thread root

How do you expect them to fix that problem when they can't even make
kpackage work

mikey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
user #83815








Praedor Tempus wrote:
> 
> I really don't get this.  It happens on SOME src rpms but most are
> fine.  What is the deal here?  I do an "rpm --rebuild" on XFree86-4.0.1
> src.rpm using rpm-3.0.5-24mdk and the src builds but no rpms are
> produced.  There are no error messages anywhere that I can find yet
> nothing of the binary rpm peruasion is to be had.  Why wont rpm
> produce rpms when it manages to successfully compile a src rpm?
> I have received no dependency missing messages at any time, when
> installing my packages, and have made sure that those that are listed
> or called for are met.
> 
> I could do a "make install" in the XFree86-4.0.1 build directory
> and it would install. BUT I WANT A FRICKIN' RPM AND AN ACCOMPANYING
> RPM ADDITION TO MY RPM DATABASE.
> 
> Anyone have an answer to this damn problem?
> 
> praedor
> 
>   
> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Well, damnit, XFree86-4.0.1 and rpm...a bit more

2000-10-07 Thread Praedor Tempus

Praedor Tempus wrote:
> 
> I really don't get this.  It happens on SOME src rpms but most are
> fine.  What is the deal here?  I do an "rpm --rebuild" on XFree86-4.0.1
> src.rpm using rpm-3.0.5-24mdk and the src builds but no rpms are
> produced.  There are no error messages anywhere that I can find yet
[...]

Just a note...

I subsequently did and "rpm --rebuild" on the XFree86-compat-3.3.6 src
rpm and it worked perfectly.  It installed, compiled, and rpms were 
produced.  No changes were made to my system between the XFree86-4.x
and 3.3.6 runs.

praedor



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Well, damnit, XFree86-4.0.1 and rpm

2000-10-07 Thread Praedor Tempus

I really don't get this.  It happens on SOME src rpms but most are
fine.  What is the deal here?  I do an "rpm --rebuild" on XFree86-4.0.1
src.rpm using rpm-3.0.5-24mdk and the src builds but no rpms are
produced.  There are no error messages anywhere that I can find yet
nothing of the binary rpm peruasion is to be had.  Why wont rpm
produce rpms when it manages to successfully compile a src rpm?
I have received no dependency missing messages at any time, when
installing my packages, and have made sure that those that are listed
or called for are met.

I could do a "make install" in the XFree86-4.0.1 build directory 
and it would install. BUT I WANT A FRICKIN' RPM AND AN ACCOMPANYING
RPM ADDITION TO MY RPM DATABASE.

Anyone have an answer to this damn problem?

praedor



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.