[expert] email filtering [spamassassin x spamfilter]

2002-01-29 Thread Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas


Spamassassin... anybody using?
I've tried it with the .procmailrc and .forward files recommended but I
saw no results!
Any recommendation?

I've been using spamfilter (http://nl.linux.org) and it's quite good!
But I've been told that spamassassim give us better control over what's to
considered "spam" or not.

Ricardo Castanho

PS:As far I heard about 'spamassassin' let's tag or score a email to be
considered spam,



-- 
delivery NOT reliable  => [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
Linux user # 102240 => Machine # 96125 => Seti@home user
==





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] email filtering [spamassassin x spamfilter]

2002-01-29 Thread Praedor Tempus

I use ricochet.  Me like.

It's simple and I simply build kmail filters as they appear required - 
and then pipe the spam through ricochet.  It automatically analyzes the 
spam email headers, determines if the sending email is likely faked or 
not, determines the correct abuse address to send to, and then sends a 
complaint email to the abuse address (the default message is good but 
you can alter it to your desires).  All I ever see is a "From nobody" 
email in my inbox that is an alert message from ricochet telling you it 
responded to spam and who it sent the complaint message to (helps fix 
broken filters...I once accidently nailed my sister because a poorly 
formatted filter caught a word in her message that it ID'd as spam...)

http://vipul.net/ricochet/

On Tuesday 29 January 2002 08:54 am, Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas 
wrote:
> Spamassassin... anybody using?
> I've tried it with the .procmailrc and .forward files recommended but
> I saw no results!
> Any recommendation?
>
> I've been using spamfilter (http://nl.linux.org) and it's quite good!
> But I've been told that spamassassim give us better control over
> what's to considered "spam" or not.
>
> Ricardo Castanho
>
> PS:As far I heard about 'spamassassin' let's tag or score a email to
> be considered spam,

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] email filtering [spamassassin x spamfilter]

2002-01-29 Thread Derek Jennings

On Tuesday 29 January 2002 15:54, you wrote:
> Spamassassin... anybody using?
> I've tried it with the .procmailrc and .forward files recommended but I
> saw no results!
> Any recommendation?
>
Yep  I've been using it for 6 months now with excellent results. I scarcely 
get any spam in my inbox, and there is no messing about with recipies.

If SpamAssassin is working all your mails will have their header altered 
showing how many 'points' they scored.
Here is a sample header it puts on your mails.

X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13 required=6 
tests=INVALID_MSGID,HTML_WITH_BGCOLOR,PORN_4,CHARSET_FARAWAY_BODY,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM,X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC
X-Spam-Flag: YES


Did you test the spamassasin as described in the README with the spam samples 
provided? 

Check on the web site for the latest instructions for use with .procmailrc  I 
think the installation instructions in the .tar.gz are out of date.

derek






> I've been using spamfilter (http://nl.linux.org) and it's quite good!
> But I've been told that spamassassim give us better control over what's to
> considered "spam" or not.
>
> Ricardo Castanho
>
> PS:As far I heard about 'spamassassin' let's tag or score a email to be
> considered spam,



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] email filtering [spamassassin x spamfilter]

2002-01-29 Thread daRcmaTTeR

On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:24:15 -0700
Praedor Tempus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:

> I use ricochet.  Me like.
> 
> It's simple and I simply build kmail filters as they appear required - 
> and then pipe the spam through ricochet.  It automatically analyzes the 
> spam email headers, determines if the sending email is likely faked or 
> not, determines the correct abuse address to send to, and then sends a 
> complaint email to the abuse address (the default message is good but 
> you can alter it to your desires).  All I ever see is a "From nobody" 
> email in my inbox that is an alert message from ricochet telling you it 
> responded to spam and who it sent the complaint message to (helps fix 
> broken filters...I once accidently nailed my sister because a poorly 
> formatted filter caught a word in her message that it ID'd as spam...)
> 
> http://vipul.net/ricochet/
> 

thanks Praedor,

since I can't read German I thought I'd take a look see at ricochet.  ;P

-- 
daRcmaTTeR
-
Registered Linux User 182496
-
 10:05pm  up 23 days, 12:37,  3 users,  load average: 0.25, 0.27, 0.21



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] email filtering [spamassassin x spamfilter]

2002-01-30 Thread Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Praedor Tempus wrote:


It seems good enough! But as I've installed spamassassin... I will give it
try!

Anyhow I will keep your suggestio! Just in case! ;-)

>I use ricochet.  Me like.
>
>It's simple and I simply build kmail filters as they appear required -
>and then pipe the spam through ricochet.  It automatically analyzes the
>spam email headers, determines if the sending email is likely faked or
>not, determines the correct abuse address to send to, and then sends a
>complaint email to the abuse address (the default message is good but
>you can alter it to your desires).  All I ever see is a "From nobody"
>email in my inbox that is an alert message from ricochet telling you it
>responded to spam and who it sent the complaint message to (helps fix
>broken filters...I once accidently nailed my sister because a poorly
>formatted filter caught a word in her message that it ID'd as spam...)
>http://vipul.net/ricochet/

Nice idea for my brother in law!

- -- 
delivery NOT reliable  => [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
Linux user # 102240 => Machine # 96125 => Seti@home user
==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Para mais informações veja http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjxYt2kACgkQqJymTCNNyXHKCwCfYqy8AKmL45LoLBrWF8+WGOzb
qfYAn2ivwt8zLYDTMZ2jE/x54nesKAzv
=5VHI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com