Re: [expert] problems after installing KDE 1.93

2000-08-31 Thread Jesper Holmberg


* On Thursday, August 31, Sarang Lakare wrote:
 No you don't have to [reboot].. as I had mentioned in a previous emial.. a simple
 "init 3" followed by "init 5" would have helped :).. I like the challange
 of doing everything (but kernel upgrade) w/o rebooting :))
 

Well, what would be the difference between running init 3/5 and a soft
reboot? In my opinion, it's the same thing. Both ways, init is the
first process to start. Not rereading bios settings is the only difference I
can think of. Init is in effect a reboot.

Jesper

-- 
Jesper Holmberg"But how can one be warm alone?"




Re: [expert] problems after installing KDE 1.93

2000-08-31 Thread Sarang Lakare


 I think it has to do with the output of the uptime command and bragging rights
 regarding the stability of the operating system. :)

correct! and the fact that init 3 and init 5 take less than a minute
compared to a hard reboot!

-sarang

 
 Tony




Re: [expert] problems after installing KDE 1.93

2000-08-31 Thread Anton Graham

Submitted 31-Aug-00 by Jesper Holmberg:

 Well, what would be the difference between running init 3/5 and a soft
 reboot? In my opinion, it's the same thing. Both ways, init is the
 first process to start. Not rereading bios settings is the only difference I
 can think of. Init is in effect a reboot.

Umm just changing runlevel with init also means no processing of all the
instructions in /etc/rc.d/rc.{sysinit,serial,firewall} which define the
basic operation conditions for the system.  These include mounting
partitions and swap, setting the clock and hostname. initiating devfs,
isapnp detection, loading of modules from /etc/rc.d/rc.modules, starting
RAID devices, and execution of the mandrake_everytime script.  So yes, there
is quite a lot of difference between the two ideas.

-- 
Anton GrahamGPG ID: 0x18F78541
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RSA key available upon request
 
"First things first -- but not necessarily in that order" 
  -- The Doctor, "Doctor Who"





RE: [expert] problems after installing KDE 1.93

2000-08-30 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS

From what I have read on this issue, you need to also get the rpm for
mandrake desk or something like that.


-Original Message-
From: peter aarestad :-) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] problems after installing KDE 1.93


Yikes! I installed all of the KDE 1.93 RPMs last night off of Cooker,
and then my X login screen got completely goofed up - it's displayed in
this retro font, and there's only one option in the window manager menu
that looks like a list: "kde, gnome, sawfish, default" or something like
that. Strangely, when I log in, it puts me in IceWM (which isn't in the
aforementioned list, but is, of course, installed on my system)! I
normally use GNOME, so I thought it would default to that. What on earth
is going on?

-peter




Re: [expert] problems after installing KDE 1.93

2000-08-30 Thread Sarang Lakare

if you had searched on this list you would have found the problem!!.. you
also need to installed mandrake_desk??? rpm... 

-sarang




Re: [expert] problems after installing KDE 1.93

2000-08-30 Thread peter aarestad :-)

Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS wrote:
 
 From what I have read on this issue, you need to also get the rpm for
 mandrake desk or something like that.

Yah - I installed that one, too - in fact, the problem was there even
after I installed it! I thought it was causing it, but after
"downgrading" to the release version of mandrake_desk, the problem
persisted.

-peter




Re: [expert] problems after installing KDE 1.93

2000-08-30 Thread Peter M Aarestad

Sarang Lakare wrote:
 
 if you had searched on this list you would have found the problem!!.. you
 also need to installed mandrake_desk??? rpm...
 
 -sarang

Unfortunately, I have installed the mandrake_desk rpm, but the problem
persists (in fact, I had installed it to begin with!)...

-peter
--
peter aarestad :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aarestad.net
peace, love, happiness, Christ, music, etc...
"The world really doesn't need more busy people, maybe not even more
intelligent people. It needs 'deep people'..."
-Don Postema




Re: [expert] problems after installing KDE 1.93

2000-08-30 Thread Peter M Aarestad

"peter aarestad :-)" wrote:
 
 Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS wrote:
 
  From what I have read on this issue, you need to also get the rpm for
  mandrake desk or something like that.
 
 Yah - I installed that one, too - in fact, the problem was there even
 after I installed it! I thought it was causing it, but after
 "downgrading" to the release version of mandrake_desk, the problem
 persisted.
 
 -peter

Of course, I realized the _real_ solution: restart!!! Silly me - I
assumed I never had to completely restart Linux to get software to
work... oh well. Sorry to bother y'all.

-peter


--
peter aarestad :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aarestad.net
peace, love, happiness, Christ, music, etc...
"The world really doesn't need more busy people, maybe not even more
intelligent people. It needs 'deep people'..."
-Don Postema




Re: [expert] problems after installing KDE 1.93

2000-08-30 Thread Sarang Lakare

 Of course, I realized the _real_ solution: restart!!! Silly me - I
 assumed I never had to completely restart Linux to get software to
 work... oh well. Sorry to bother y'all.

No you don't have to.. as I had mentioned in a previous emial.. a simple
"init 3" followed by "init 5" would have helped :).. I like the challange
of doing everything (but kernel upgrade) w/o rebooting :))

-sarang

 
 -peter
 
 --
 peter aarestad :-)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.aarestad.net
 peace, love, happiness, Christ, music, etc...
 "The world really doesn't need more busy people, maybe not even more
 intelligent people. It needs 'deep people'..."
 -Don Postema