Re: [expert] Mandrake 8.0 and executables that don't.
Will Woods wrote: Hi, I have just done a fresh install of Mandrake 8.0 after having used 7.2 with no problems for some time. I am trying to install two different I have this problem with perl and Oracle 8i... When I upgraded my glibc2.2, all gone fine... Good luck -- Leonardo T. de Carvalho Ibiz Tecnologia Frase aleatória: A sequel is an admission that you've been reduced to imitating yourself. -- Don Marquis
Re: [expert] Mandrake 8.0 and executables that don't.
On Friday 25 May 2001 05:11, Praedor Tempus wrote: I have run into this several times myself. With me, the latest such episode occurred with sixpack, a bibliography application for lyx. I installed it, which went fine. I then try to run it and get the same message you do. I then do a which executable and it properly identifies the executable in the proper place. The executable just wont work and isn't recognized. I then tried reinstalling and that appeared to do the trick. I have run into this with several different programs lately: sixpack, pybliographic, k3d, and a couple others I can't recall right now. On Friday 25 May 2001 03:01, Will Woods wrote: Hi, I have just done a fresh install of Mandrake 8.0 after having used 7.2 with no problems for some time. I am trying to install two different commercial symbolic math packages, Macsyma Pro 2.4 and Maple V. Both packages seem to install fine, but the executables they install are not recognized by the system. I can list them, e.g. ls -l for Maple gives: # ls -l mapleTTY -rwxrwxr-x1 alias24 669660 Jan 11 1998 mapleTTY* but trying to execute it gives the following: # ./mapleTTY bash: ./mapleTTY: No such file or directory (this is not a PATH problem, it happens when I'm in the same dir as the executable) The same problem occurs for Macsyma. Both packages installed and ran fine under 7.2. Anybody got any ideas? Thanks for any help Will If which works then you can always use $(which program) to execute program. When those two don't match up, it is usually a PATH problem. You really need a blank path at the front of the stream of paths. Civileme
Re: [expert] Mandrake 8.0 and executables that don't.
Well, that was just it. I installed sixpack and this proceeded OK, with the executable being installed in /usr/local/bin. This is in my path. I then tried running it but I kept getting no such file or directory. I then did a which bib (the sixpack app) and it was correctly identified as being in /usr/local/bin. I checked it's perms and they were correct. I changed to the /usr/local/bin directory and tried to run it from there, ./bib and this gave the same message about no such file... I also checked to make sure the file was the correct size and it was. The file was in /usr/local/bin, it was executable, it had correct perms, /usr/local/bin is in my path, and the file was not found. Finally, I tried reinstalling it and, for whatever reason (fortunately) it worked this time round. This has happened with a few other non-rpms too. I do not recall having this happen with any rpms but I may be mistaken. The other thing is, some of the tarballs I installed were the exact, unchanged tarballs that installed and worked perfectly under 7.2 (which had mostly been upgraded to 8.0, by the way). On Saturday 26 May 2001 14:19, Civileme wrote: On Friday 25 May 2001 05:11, Praedor Tempus wrote: I have run into this several times myself. With me, the latest such episode occurred with sixpack, a bibliography application for lyx. I installed it, which went fine. I then try to run it and get the same message you do. I then do a which executable and it properly identifies the executable in the proper place. [...] If which works then you can always use $(which program) to execute program. When those two don't match up, it is usually a PATH problem. You really need a blank path at the front of the stream of paths. Civileme -- Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain.
Re: [expert] Mandrake 8.0 and executables that don't.
On Friday 25 May 2001 05:01 am, Will Woods wrote: Hi, I have just done a fresh install of Mandrake 8.0 after having used 7.2 with no problems for some time. I am trying to install two different commercial symbolic math packages, Macsyma Pro 2.4 and Maple V. Both packages seem to install fine, but the executables they install are not recognized by the system. I can list them, e.g. ls -l for Maple gives: # ls -l mapleTTY -rwxrwxr-x1 alias24 669660 Jan 11 1998 mapleTTY* Wordperfect 8 seems to exhibit the same problems until you install ld.so-1.9.11-4mdk.i586.rpm. I have no idea if that package will fix it, it may be that the same _type_ of problem exists. Hoyt
Re: [expert] Mandrake 8.0 and executables that don't.
I have run into this several times myself. With me, the latest such episode occurred with sixpack, a bibliography application for lyx. I installed it, which went fine. I then try to run it and get the same message you do. I then do a which executable and it properly identifies the executable in the proper place. The executable just wont work and isn't recognized. I then tried reinstalling and that appeared to do the trick. I have run into this with several different programs lately: sixpack, pybliographic, k3d, and a couple others I can't recall right now. On Friday 25 May 2001 03:01, Will Woods wrote: Hi, I have just done a fresh install of Mandrake 8.0 after having used 7.2 with no problems for some time. I am trying to install two different commercial symbolic math packages, Macsyma Pro 2.4 and Maple V. Both packages seem to install fine, but the executables they install are not recognized by the system. I can list them, e.g. ls -l for Maple gives: # ls -l mapleTTY -rwxrwxr-x1 alias24 669660 Jan 11 1998 mapleTTY* but trying to execute it gives the following: # ./mapleTTY bash: ./mapleTTY: No such file or directory (this is not a PATH problem, it happens when I'm in the same dir as the executable) The same problem occurs for Macsyma. Both packages installed and ran fine under 7.2. Anybody got any ideas? Thanks for any help Will -- Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain.
Re: [expert] Mandrake 8.0 and executables that don't.
On Friday 25 May 2001 10:43 am, Will Woods wrote: I seem to get a conflict with ldconfig-2.2.2-4mdk when I try and install it. Can I force it to install (and is that advisable?) Thanks for your help. Will I have not yet applied the fix to my computer, but a friend has to his (and forced it) with no apparrent problems . . . BUT . . . it's not a smart thing to do unless you are able to recover and repair your system in case of trouble. Hoyt