Re: [expert] Please fix multiple address system!
Don't waste your time asking... this has been a problem for MANY months... there have been some tweaks to the mailer; but this behaviour resists resolution. The workaround is to send individual messages to each list. Pierre Randy Kramer wrote: > > Benjamin, > > I'm curious -- I received two copies of your message "Linux > Fragmentation -- Is the Unthinkable already here?" which seems > appropriate since I am subscribed to both the newbie and expert list and > you sent the message to both lists. > > Is this different than the behavior you are seeing, or are we talking > about different subjects? > > Randy Kramer > > Benjamin Sher wrote: > > When will Mandrake fix their multiple address system: Every time I send a > > message to both Expert and Newbie lists, both messages end up being sent to > > one and only one address. That is very annoying. Please correct this bug > > that's been around for months.
Re: [expert] Please fix multiple address system!
Benjamin, I'm curious -- I received two copies of your message "Linux Fragmentation -- Is the Unthinkable already here?" which seems appropriate since I am subscribed to both the newbie and expert list and you sent the message to both lists. Is this different than the behavior you are seeing, or are we talking about different subjects? Randy Kramer Benjamin Sher wrote: > When will Mandrake fix their multiple address system: Every time I send a > message to both Expert and Newbie lists, both messages end up being sent to > one and only one address. That is very annoying. Please correct this bug > that's been around for months.
Re: [expert] PLEASE FIX REPLY-TO in this list!!!
You are rightdave, I overlooked that. I do not have "digest" subscription. Viktor On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 07:31:40PM -0500, b5dave wrote: > Bob is talking specifically about the *digest* version of the list. My > "reply-to's" work fine, but I *don't* get the digest version. Is there > anyone here with the digest version with the same problem as Bob? I may > be wrong, but I'm assuming that Viktor didn't catch the *digest* aspect > of Bob's complaint. If I'm wrong, Viktor, please accept my apologies.
Re: [expert] PLEASE FIX REPLY-TO in this list!!!
Bob is talking specifically about the *digest* version of the list. My "reply-to's" work fine, but I *don't* get the digest version. Is there anyone here with the digest version with the same problem as Bob? I may be wrong, but I'm assuming that Viktor didn't catch the *digest* aspect of Bob's complaint. If I'm wrong, Viktor, please accept my apologies. On 15-Jan-2001 Viktor Lakics wrote: > This is a *REPLY* to your message. It goes to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think your email client does not > handles that correctly...FYI, I use mutt under LM7.2. > > Viktor > On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:28:02PM -0500, Bob Puff@NLE wrote: >> Would someone PLEASE fix the REPLY-TO address for the digest of this >> list?! Replies get sent to "expert-request", which then fail. >> >> Bob >>
Re: [expert] PLEASE FIX REPLY-TO in this list!!!
I don't seem to be hacing any problems with it either. The reply to address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am currently using pine for all of my email > This is a *REPLY* to your message. It goes to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think your email client does not > handles that correctly...FYI, I use mutt under LM7.2. > > Viktor > On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:28:02PM -0500, Bob Puff@NLE wrote: > > Would someone PLEASE fix the REPLY-TO address for the digest of this list?! >Replies get sent to "expert-request", which then fail. > > > > Bob > > > I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. - Douglas Adams
Re: [expert] PLEASE FIX REPLY-TO in this list!!!
I have found that sometimes (I have not looked as to why) that the reply-to on this list sometimes defaults to the list, or often to the original poster of the message. This is the only list I know of that does this. It seems that the dulpicate message problem has been fixed (well, I havent had anywhere near the number of dups as before) so maybe the list manager could look into this as well. BillK Viktor Lakics wrote: > > This is a *REPLY* to your message. It goes to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think your email client does not > handles that correctly...FYI, I use mutt under LM7.2. > > Viktor > On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:28:02PM -0500, Bob Puff@NLE wrote: > > Would someone PLEASE fix the REPLY-TO address for the digest of this list?! >Replies get sent to "expert-request", which then fail. > > > > Bob > >
Re: [expert] PLEASE FIX REPLY-TO in this list!!!
This is a *REPLY* to your message. It goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think your email client does not handles that correctly...FYI, I use mutt under LM7.2. Viktor On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:28:02PM -0500, Bob Puff@NLE wrote: > Would someone PLEASE fix the REPLY-TO address for the digest of this list?! Replies >get sent to "expert-request", which then fail. > > Bob >
Re: [expert] Please Fix
On sab, 22 gen 2000, Darryl White wrote: >I don't know about everyone else, but I have received numerous anti-spam >replies from you. (I have never sent you a message until now) Please >take time to change how your filters are executed. You are creating >spam on the list. Very sorry! I'm a real beginner in sendmail configuration and I think I could done some mistakes. I work in linux behind a firewall and my mail address comes from a linux machine outside the firewall that is not configured by me. So I have to understand which machine is creating the traffic. Could you help me? I suppose that it's not me generating the noise (my machine has address 10.0.20.64 internal) but the external server (www.ismaa.it) that is administered by my organization. Can you reply me the anti-spam reply? Could you tell me from which machine these messages are coming from? Thanks and sorry again! -- Marco Ciampa Universita', s.f.: Come una software house, eccetto che il software e' gratuito, ed e' utilizzabile, e funziona, e se si pianta ti dicono subito come correggerlo, e ...
Re: [expert] Please Fix
Darryl White écrivit : > > I don't know about everyone else, but I have received numerous anti-spam > replies from you. Hi, Robot have been inscribed. Sorry for inconvenience. Regards, David BAUDENS -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --David
