Re: [expert] error message
On Monday 15 January 2001 12:17 pm, you wrote: > Hi all, > Everytime I start firestarter (firewall) I get the following error > message 14 times. /sbin/ipchains: invalid mask " specified Your firewall is not working perfectly without complaints. There are 14 rules which are not instituted. This error is a result of invalid network masks in the ipchains ruleset. Take a look at the firewall generated by the firestarter gui, look for a network specification that looks like 192.168.0.0/ or something odd after the slash. Or check to see that anywhere you have specifed a network address that you have used a properl netmask. The next thing you'd want to do is let the folks who write firestarter about this problem. They will be able to help, and if this is a failing of the interface, definitely need to know about it. -- Matthew Micene A host is a host from coast to coast, Systems Development Managerand no one will talk to a host too close Express Search Inc.Unless the host that isn't close www.ExpressSearch.com is busy, hung or dead
RE: [expert] Error message "Can't open MFT" What is this?
I see this periodically appear on the console. I know that it's due to a daemon, but I don't know which one. There are no hard drive problems, nor mount problems with NFS volumes... just the error message. Nothing appears in the logs which is suspecious either. Except for this message the system runs fine. Thanks. |-Original Message- |From: Matt Stegman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2000 11:14 AM |To: Jose M. Sanchez |Cc: Expert@Linux-Mandrake. Com |Subject: Re: [expert] Error message "Can't open MFT" What is this? | | |It would help a little more if you gave a context; to tell us where the |error was seen. | |To me, it sounds like a mount error, more specifically, for NTFS. The MFT |is NTFS' equivalent of an inode table/FAT. If it can't open the MFT, |you've probably got horrible, horrible filesystem corruption. | |Is this where the error came from? | |-Matt Stegman |<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | |On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Jose M. Sanchez wrote: | |> |> Does anyone know what issues the error message "Can't open MFT"? |> |> Thanks! |> |> -JMS |> [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> |
Re: [expert] Error message "Can't open MFT" What is this?
It would help a little more if you gave a context; to tell us where the error was seen. To me, it sounds like a mount error, more specifically, for NTFS. The MFT is NTFS' equivalent of an inode table/FAT. If it can't open the MFT, you've probably got horrible, horrible filesystem corruption. Is this where the error came from? -Matt Stegman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Jose M. Sanchez wrote: > > Does anyone know what issues the error message "Can't open MFT"? > > Thanks! > > -JMS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: [expert] Error message
On Sun, 02 Apr 2000, you wrote: > One little note, QT and GTK are two entirely different widget sets. QT is the > one used by KDE while GTK is uded by Gnome. The problem has nothing to do with > the two differnt versions of QT. > Ahh...Ok. My bad. :-) John
Re: [expert] Error message
One little note, QT and GTK are two entirely different widget sets. QT is the one used by KDE while GTK is uded by Gnome. The problem has nothing to do with the two differnt versions of QT. As for the exact problem at hand, you might need to install gtk+ 1.2.7 as I know that the versions run concurrently with one another. I was trying to do what you were doing and ran into similar problems. I just decieded to say screw it and wait for an RPM of the two libraries. I hate screwing with important system libraries. Tom On Sun, 02 Apr 2000, you wrote: > On Sat, 01 Apr 2000, you wrote: > > After installing the glib version 1.2.7 I am still getting the wollowing error > > message while trying to run the config on spruce 0.6.2. > > > > Could anyone tell me what it means and how I get around it? > > > > *** Could not run GTK test program, checking why... > > *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the > > *** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK was incorrectly installed > > *** or that you have moved GTK since it was installed. In the latter case, you > > *** may want to edit the gtk-config script: /usr/bin/gtk-config > > configure: error: Cannot find GTK: Is gtk-config in path? > > > RedHat 6.1? They include two versions of QT. Your Spruce config is finding the > QT2.0 version, which really is useless. > John
Re: [expert] Error message
On Sat, 01 Apr 2000, you wrote: > After installing the glib version 1.2.7 I am still getting the wollowing error > message while trying to run the config on spruce 0.6.2. > > Could anyone tell me what it means and how I get around it? > > *** Could not run GTK test program, checking why... > *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the > *** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK was incorrectly installed > *** or that you have moved GTK since it was installed. In the latter case, you > *** may want to edit the gtk-config script: /usr/bin/gtk-config > configure: error: Cannot find GTK: Is gtk-config in path? > RedHat 6.1? They include two versions of QT. Your Spruce config is finding the QT2.0 version, which really is useless. John
Re: [expert] Error message
Well, *is* /usr/bin in your path? Do you have development tools (compiler/linker/make) installed? Do other programs compile correctly? On Sat, 01 Apr 2000, you wrote: | After installing the glib version 1.2.7 I am still getting the wollowing error | message while trying to run the config on spruce 0.6.2. | | Could anyone tell me what it means and how I get around it? | | *** Could not run GTK test program, checking why... | *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the | *** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK was incorrectly installed | *** or that you have moved GTK since it was installed. In the latter case, you | *** may want to edit the gtk-config script: /usr/bin/gtk-config | configure: error: Cannot find GTK: Is gtk-config in path? | | *** | *** | Wayne Petherick | Criminology Department | Humanities and Social Sciences | Bond University | *** | *** -- "Brian, the man from babbleon-on" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents. Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com.
Re: [expert] Error message
Wayne If you read up on rpm and how to use it, you will save yourself a lot of time trying to find solutions to this kind of a problem. rpm -qf /usr/bin/gtk-config will tell you that the file is part of gtk+-devel. What this probably means is that besides the glib update you probably need to update the gtk+ and gtk+-devel rpm's first. Then, if you get more error messages, just track them back to the rpm the same way and eventually... you will get everything updated to where your software will compile. Tom Wayne Petherick wrote: > > After installing the glib version 1.2.7 I am still getting the wollowing error > message while trying to run the config on spruce 0.6.2. > > Could anyone tell me what it means and how I get around it? > > *** Could not run GTK test program, checking why... > *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the > *** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK was incorrectly installed > *** or that you have moved GTK since it was installed. In the latter case, you > *** may want to edit the gtk-config script: /usr/bin/gtk-config > configure: error: Cannot find GTK: Is gtk-config in path? > > *** > *** > Wayne Petherick > Criminology Department > Humanities and Social Sciences > Bond University > *** > ***
Re: [expert] error message
On Mar 19 Wayne wrote: > Anyone shed anylight on what this means? > > > /usr/X11R6/bin/abiword: line 34: 4043 Segmentation fault (core dumped) > $ABISUITE_HOME/bin/AbiWord_d "$@" Hi, abiword received a signal SIGSEGV (11), because tried to store a value in a const object or tried to access storage outside any of the functions or data objects and the program can not safely continued. This is the most possible variation. Rene > > *** > *** > Wayne Petherick > Criminology Department > Humanities and Social Sciences > Bond University > Gold Coast, Australia > *** > *** > > -- UNIX was never designed to keep people from doing stupid things, because that policy would also keep them from doing clever things. (Doug Gwyn)
RE: [expert] Error message at boot time
It's a buggy drive, doesn't support multimode transfers. If your telling it to do this via hdparm remove the -m1, other wise just ignore it. On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, phobet-channel1 wrote: > It sounds like your drive is getting ready to die. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 17, 1999 11:19 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [expert] Error message at boot time > > Hello there! > When I run lilo, i have the following messages > "partition check > hdb : set multimode : status=0x51 (Drive ready SeekComplete Error) > hdb : set multimode : error=0x04 (drive status error) > hdb1, hdb2 > (the drive is an ST 34321A, 4.6 Gb w/128kb cache, CHS=523/255/62) > I must say that these things already happened when i was under RH5.1 > Except for that everything goes well and the partitions are correctly > mounted even the vfat ons...quite strange anybody any idea??? > Thanx > > -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Axalon
RE: [expert] Error message at boot time
It sounds like your drive is getting ready to die. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 17, 1999 11:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [expert] Error message at boot time Hello there! When I run lilo, i have the following messages "partition check hdb : set multimode : status=0x51 (Drive ready SeekComplete Error) hdb : set multimode : error=0x04 (drive status error) hdb1, hdb2 (the drive is an ST 34321A, 4.6 Gb w/128kb cache, CHS=523/255/62) I must say that these things already happened when i was under RH5.1 Except for that everything goes well and the partitions are correctly mounted even the vfat ons...quite strange anybody any idea??? Thanx
