Re: Sort By Thread (WAS: [expert] missing SSH ?)
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just a quick comment, and I'll probably get blasted for it, but I haven't > found a mail client for Linux that does "View by Thread" as well as MS > Outlook. Netscape is horrible, I don't think Polarbar does it, and I > haven't been happy with other clients I've tried. pine does also "sort by subject". - "Pause. No sound, exept for the background screams, groans and hisses of hot iron on perpetually renewed flesh. You could have heard a twenty-foot molybdenum steel pin drop." Tom Holt, Faust Among Equals, p.244 Sending unsolicited commercial email to this address may be a violation of the Washington State Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW. Das Verschicken unverlangter kommerzieller email an diese Adresse ist verboten (LG Traunstein, 2 HK O 3755/97 vom 14.10.1997, CR 1998, 171f).
Re: Sort By Thread (WAS: [expert] missing SSH ?)
Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'll second that. I've been using mutt myself for a few years now > and I haven't wanted to try anything else yet. Pretty lightweight > but so powerful. It's great! emacs and this : (setq gnus-thread-sort-functions '(gnus-thread-sort-by-number gnus-thread-sort-by-date gnus-thread-sort-by-subject gnus-thread-sort-by-total-score)) in .gnus > The PGP/GPG support is also done nicely. -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel
Re: Sort By Thread (WAS: [expert] missing SSH ?)
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 02:01:20PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just a quick comment, and I'll probably get blasted for it, but I haven't > found a mail client for Linux that does "View by Thread" as well as MS > Outlook. Netscape is horrible, I don't think Polarbar does it, and I > haven't been happy with other clients I've tried. mutt does it pretty good... I get a really nice threaded mailbox for mailing lists... =) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net Freezer Burn BBS: telnet://bbs.freezer-burn.org . ICQ: 54924721 Webmaster for the Linux Portal Site Freezer Burn: http://www.freezer-burn.org
Re: Sort By Thread (WAS: [expert] missing SSH ?)
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 02:45:08PM -0700, Anton Graham wrote: > Submitted 22-Jun-00 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Just a quick comment, and I'll probably get blasted for it, but I haven't > > found a mail client for Linux that does "View by Thread" as well as MS > > Outlook. Netscape is horrible, I don't think Polarbar does it, and I > > haven't been happy with other clients I've tried. > > Try mutt :p I'll second that. I've been using mutt myself for a few years now and I haven't wanted to try anything else yet. Pretty lightweight but so powerful. It's great! The PGP/GPG support is also done nicely. -- Jon Changnon, Director of Operations e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] p: 440.951.9525 http://www.dncc.net
Re: Sort By Thread (WAS: [expert] missing SSH ?)
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 02:01:20PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just a quick comment, and I'll probably get blasted for it, but I haven't > found a mail client for Linux that does "View by Thread" as well as MS > Outlook. Netscape is horrible, I don't think Polarbar does it, and I > haven't been happy with other clients I've tried. Here you go: ZZZpp** "mutt" does it pretty well... Tryx it out by chance :) Cya Smurphy -- You had mail, but the super-user read it, and deleted it! | Joerg Mertin : [EMAIL PROTECTED](Home)| | in Neuchâtel/Schweiz : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work)| | Stardust's LiNUX System : http://www.solsys.org | | PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand : Data, Voice & Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54 | PGP fingerprint: 6D E9 7B 04 57 7B 65 42 B7 7A D0 AA 69 95 7C E1
Re: Sort By Thread (WAS: [expert] missing SSH ?)
I use Netscape with the sorting by subject, and it seems to work quite well for purposes of this mailing list, at least. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Just a quick comment, and I'll probably get blasted for it, but I haven't > found a mail client for Linux that does "View by Thread" as well as MS > Outlook. Netscape is horrible, I don't think Polarbar does it, and I > haven't been happy with other clients I've tried. > > > On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, you wrote: > > > > I think that if we all had our mail clients set to display by THREAD, > > we'd have seen the responses. However, you can't FORCE people to read > > by thread. I, for example, prefer to read by date/time of arrival. > > John > > > > > > - > This message was sent using MI-Webmail. > No matter where you are, never lose touch. > Get your Email using MI-Webmail. > http://www.monmouth.com/ -- "Brian, the man from babble-on" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents. Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com.
Re: Sort By Thread (WAS: [expert] missing SSH ?)
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote: > Just a quick comment, and I'll probably get blasted for it, but I haven't > found a mail client for Linux that does "View by Thread" as well as MS > Outlook. Netscape is horrible, I don't think Polarbar does it, and I > haven't been happy with other clients I've tried. > Outlook Express does a good job of it too. (I just *detest* Outlook! ) Despite it being a Micro$oft product, OE is a darned nice email client. Now, if only they didn't make it DEFAULT to html! :-) John
Re: Sort By Thread (WAS: [expert] missing SSH ?)
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 02:01:20PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -> Just a quick comment, and I'll probably get blasted for it, but I haven't -> found a mail client for Linux that does "View by Thread" as well as MS -> Outlook. Netscape is horrible, I don't think Polarbar does it, and I -> haven't been happy with other clients I've tried. -> -> -> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, you wrote: -> > -> > I think that if we all had our mail clients set to display by THREAD, -> > we'd have seen the responses. However, you can't FORCE people to read -> > by thread. I, for example, prefer to read by date/time of arrival. -> >John Well, you are obviously a well-trained Microserf, putting your reply at the top of the message like that. :-) Have you tried mutt? It threads quite well, and has support for gpg/pgp as well. http://www.mutt.org -- -- C^2 No windows were crashed in the making of this email. Looking for fine software and/or web pages? http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley PGP signature
Re: Sort By Thread (WAS: [expert] missing SSH ?)
Submitted 22-Jun-00 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Just a quick comment, and I'll probably get blasted for it, but I haven't > found a mail client for Linux that does "View by Thread" as well as MS > Outlook. Netscape is horrible, I don't think Polarbar does it, and I > haven't been happy with other clients I've tried. Try mutt :p ~Anton
Sort By Thread (WAS: [expert] missing SSH ?)
Just a quick comment, and I'll probably get blasted for it, but I haven't found a mail client for Linux that does "View by Thread" as well as MS Outlook. Netscape is horrible, I don't think Polarbar does it, and I haven't been happy with other clients I've tried. > On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, you wrote: > > I think that if we all had our mail clients set to display by THREAD, > we'd have seen the responses. However, you can't FORCE people to read > by thread. I, for example, prefer to read by date/time of arrival. > John > > - This message was sent using MI-Webmail. No matter where you are, never lose touch. Get your Email using MI-Webmail. http://www.monmouth.com/