[FairfieldLife] Re: The Rich Are Staging a Coup This Morning ...a message from Michael Moore
Judy, Here's an article below by Jim Jubak on the 700 billion bailout. He writes a regular column for MSN Money. This level of finance is over my head, so I can't make a judgement, but I think he makes some interesting arguments. I think maybe, that as we are changing from an old kali yuga age to a new age of sat yuga this may be a shake up, a cleansing, a purification that is happening, a wake up call. Suzi Orman says that how we handle our money reflects where we are spiritualy. I think this is true for individuals, households, and nations. She says people first, money second, and things third. I agree. http://tiny.cc/dsWhh --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > ++ Did you see the Jon Stewart comparison between the Iraq > > war and the bailout? Looked like the same boogeyman BS. > > I didn't watch it, but any such comparison is BS, > and Stewart should be ashamed of himself for > furthering it, IMHO. Moore too. > > > The bailout looks like another part of an ongoing program that > > has been going on for a long time. N. > > I'll grant you it *does* "look like" that, but looks > can be deceptive, especially to nonexperts. > > One of the major differences is that there were very > few experts on Iraq back in 2002-2003, so we had to > take BushCo's word for it on the basis for the war. > > But there are a whole lot of experts on the > financial markets today. I don't know if anybody has > taken a poll of these experts, but there sure are a > lot of them who are insisting that the bailout must > be passed. > > Another difference is that those who were against > the Iraq war were almost frozen out of media > coverage, whereas this time around, there's at > least equal coverage of those for and against the > bailout, so the public can't help but hear the > negative case, which reinforces their own > preconceptions. > > And yet another difference is that we had just gone > through a catastrophe at the time the Iraq War was > being engineered, and people were scared and angry, > ready to believe whatever the administration told > them to avert an even bigger one. > > This time, while the run-up to the catastrophe has > been evident for some time, it's been in slow motion, > and a lot of it has been behind the scenes. Just as > most ordinary people had no reason to expect 9/11, > most ordinary people today don't see any reason to > expect a sudden and catastrophic financial meltdown. > > One of the most telling points, it seems to me, is > that it was the Republicans in Congress who were most > vehemently in favor of the Iraq War. Today, it's the > Republicans in Congress who are most vehemently > opposed to the bailout, while most Democrats are > supporting it (albeit reluctantly). > > In other words, the apparent similarities between > the Iraq War and the bailout are just that, apparent, > and only superficial. When you look deeper, they're > very different situations. >
[FairfieldLife] Global Peace Meditation and Prayer Day May 20, 2007
Join in the Global Peace Meditation and Prayer Day today. Meditate or pray for 15 to 30 minutes. Pacific time: 2:00 pm Chicago time: 4:00 pm New York time: 5:00 pm http://www.globalpeacemeditationprayerday.org http://worldpeace.org
[FairfieldLife] test
test To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Our future is being drugged away
Thanks for posting this Jeff. My friends child is on ADHD drugs and he is trying to find an alternative. I will forward this article to him. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Testimony to the State of Georgia Senate > Re: Senate Bill 430TeenScreen > by Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD > August 16, 2006 > > Whether you speak of teen-screen, infant-screen, toddler-screen or > elder-screen (they are all on their way to the nearest school), > there is one thing you need to know about psychiatric diagnosis: > there is no such thing as a psychiatric "disorder," "disease," > or, "chemical imbalance." And yet, psychiatry, Big Pharma, the > House, Senate and White House, drunk on money and power, insist that > all psychiatric diagnoses are "diseases" which must be treated, if > even by court order; if even they have to call you a "negligent" > parent and make the court your child's parent. > > We continue to accept the "chemical imbalance" lie at our own > peril. Infinite damage has already been done. Think Columbine, > think Conyers, Georgia, where T.J. Solomon shot six, think Haditha, > Iraq, and think of the Armed Forces recruiting shortfalls due to the > burgeoning psychiatric epidemic in the nation's schools. Think of > the accumulative toll of our believing in this brazen, > Machiavellian, lie. Think of a child in your own family (like > classrooms, every family has oneor more). > > In 1948, psychiatry and neurology were made into separate > specialtiesneurology, my specialty, to diagnose and treat actual > diseases of the brain; psychiatry to address the emotional and > behavioral (psychological) problems in normals, and, in the > physically ill as wellnone of them diseases. [1] > > In the fifties, chlorpromazine/Thorazine, the first antipsychotic > drug was synthesized. Other psychotropic drugs followed. Today, > 91% of children who see a child psychiatrist are put on a drug, 18% - > -most of them normal--on a dangerous, deadly, antipsychotic. > > In 1960, when I graduated from the NYU School of Medicine, no such > thing as a psychiatric disease existed. > > In 1963 when I was the first to analyze the chromosomes of cancer > cells from the spinal fluid [2] and in 1969 when I was the first to > describe glioma-polyposis syndrome (another word for disease) [3] > there was still no such thing as a psychiatric diseasea disease > being a demonstrable macroscopic, microscopic, or chemical > abnormalitiesa palpable or visible tumor, a positive "Pap" smear or > biopsy, or, an elevated blood sugar as in diabetes mellitus or > phenylalanine level, in PKU. > > Little did I know that Psychiatry, Big Pharma and the Federal > Government were well along with their "big lie," marketplace > strategy--to tell the publicall patients at one time or another, > that emotional and behavioral problems were not due to their > upbringing, environment, circumstances, but thateureka!--they > were "disorders"/ "diseases"/ "abnormalities" /"chemical > imbalances" of the brain, each needing, or requiring, a chemical > balancer--pill. > > On September 29, 1970, Representative Cornelius Gallagher of New > Jersey launched the Congressional hearing, Federal Involvement in > the Use of Behavior Modification Drugs on Grammar School Children: > Behavior Modification Drugs in School Children, saying: "I have > received letters critical of minimal brain dysfunction, one of > thirty-eight names attached to this condition." > > But, clearly, the "chemical imbalance" strategy was in place. Dr. > Ronald Lipman, Chief of the Clinical Studies Section, FDA, > testified: " hyperkinesis is a medical syndrome. It should be > properly diagnosed by a medical doctor." > > In the DSM-III of 1980 it was ADD; in the DSM-III-R of 1987, ADHD; > in the DSM-IV of 1994, it was ADHD of another sort. No science to > get in the way. > > On December 22, 1994, Paul Leber, MD, Director, Division of > Neuropharmacological Drug Products of the FDA, wrote to me: " no > distinct pathophysiology for the disorder (ADHD) has been > delineated." > > On May, 13, 1998, F. Xavier Castellanos of the NIMH wrote to me: " > we have not yet met the burden of demonstrating the specific > pathophysiology that we believe underlies this condition." > > At the November 16-18, 1998 Consensus Conference, William B Carey > [4], speaking on the subject: "Is ADHD a Valid Disorder?" > concluded: "What is described as ADHD in the United States appears > to be a set of normal behavioral variations..." > > James M. Swanson and F. Xavier Castellanos [5] reviewed the > structural/anatomic MRI research [5-18] concluding: " ADHD > subjects have on-average 10% brain atrophy." > > From a floor microphone I (Baughman) challenged Swanson: "Why didn't > you mention that virtually all of the ADHD subjects were on > stimulant (Ri
[FairfieldLife] Re: Lalitha Sahasranam posted on-line
Which way does the Kamakshi Devi temple face? Is it proper vastu? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "benjaminccollins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have some recordings of Lalith Sahasranam which I will post on > www.puja.net so anyone who wants them can download for free. I think > I also have a transliteration and translation which I will also post > in case you are interested. The links will be towards the bottom of > the main page. > > Interestingly enough the site where Agastya-rishi was given this > knowledge by Varaha is the Varadaraja Temple in Kanchipuram southeast > of Madras. > > The temple is literally across the street from the place where my > puja.net yagya group has our monthly yagyas. Inside the temple walls > is the 2nd largest Vishnu temple in all of India. The temple has a > large water "pond" in the middle of which is a special temple for a > form of Vishnu that is kept in a special sealed box under the water > and only taken out for pujas every 30 years! > > As an aside all of the temples in Kanchipuram face the main temple in > the area, the Kamakshi Devi temple. So there are many many south > facing temples. (so much for vastu!) > > Regards, > Ben > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM ~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: A message from Bevan Morris: Maharishi on cell phones
Experiments have shown that the antenna radiation travels up the wire ear- piece cord to the ear-piece at the head. An ear-piece with an air-tube to the ear-piece at the head prevents the radiation from traveling up the wire cord and being radiated at the head. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dear Faculty and Ideal Administrators: > > > > I think we should have cell phones only as an emergency device, > and not use > > them as a regular way of talking and working. Even for emergency > use, it's > > best to use cell phones with speakers in them that can be held > away from the > > head, or using a plastic air-tube and ear-piece, which do not > contain metal > > conductors and which also allow the cell phone to be distanced > from the > > head. > > > > > I don't have a problem with the possibility that cellphones may pose > a microwave radiation hazard, but I think Bevan is a little shaky on > the concept: it's the transmitter/antenna that broadcasts the > radiation, not the speakers, and it does not make any difference > whether metal parts that are not transmitters are close to the head, > as they would not be "conducting" the radiation: > > "CellAntenna Corporation, a > leading provider of solutions that solve cellular communication > problems, > today announced the potential health benefits of its external > cellular antenna > products. According to Howard Melamed, CEO of CellAntenna > Corporation, > external cellular antennas drastically decrease the cellular phones > level of > microwave radiation absorbed by the human body when used properly. > Studies examining the health effects of prolonged exposure to > cellular > phone electromagnetic radiation (EMR) have been inconclusive or have > produced > mixed results. But the reality is that cellular phones emit > microwave signals > that are partially absorbed by the body as users make and receive > calls on > cellular phones. The radiation level produced by cellular phones is > exacerbated by environmental interference and sparse cellular > signals, as > phones are engineered to operate at full power while in areas with a > limited > cellular signal. > Cell phone users can route the cellular radiation away by > installing an > external antenna that connects to their cell phone via an adapter. > The > antenna is then placed at a distance away from them. Additionally, > external > antennas reduce the radiation power output level of cell phones by > helping > them relay their signals more efficiently to the nearest cellular > towers. > Having lower power output has the added effect of lowering battery > power > consumption and increasing talk time. > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM ~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
