[FairfieldLife] Ron Paul

[thedoc108]

Fox News and the Republican Party of Iowa are refusing to allow Ron 
Paul to join the Iowa debate in early december. They "claim" he does 
not have a 5% name recognition on telephone polls. Good excuse to 
keep him out. None of the other candidates have raised over $4 
million in one day as he did on nov. 5, 2007. 

Republican Party of Iowa: To host presidential debate in Des Moines
Contact: Mary Tiffany
(515) 282-8105

Debate to be nationally televised by FOX NEWS CHANNEL

The Republican Party of Iowa announced today that it will hold its
presidential debate at Hy-Vee Hall in downtown Des Moines. The event, 
to be
held the evening of December 4, 2007, will be the first debate in 
Iowa to be
televised by FOX News Channel this election season, as well as the 
first
debate sponsored by the Republican Party of Iowa.

Republican Party of Iowa Chairman Ray Hoffmann said, "With the 
caucuses less
than a month away, our December 4 debate will be very telling to 
Iowans and
the nation. We are thrilled to be having this event in central Iowa, 
and
right in downtown Des Moines which will be the epicenter on caucus 
night."

What I am doing is sending Mr. Hoffman an email, ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ) and letting him know that if Ron Paul is 
not onthe debate that I will vote for the "WICKED BITCH".

Ray Hoffmann, Chairman
Sioux City
Dear Mr. Hoffman,
I wanted to let you and all of the IOWA folks know that my wife and I 
are in
our early 80s and have always voted Republican.  I am letting you 
know that
if you try this criteria garbage whose sole purpose is to eliminate 
Ron Paul
from the debate in December, my wife and I and over 10+ family 
members have
decided that we will not only vote for the "WICKED BITCH OF THE EAST" 
come
2008, but send her $500 on top of that.

But if you insist on a criteria then it should be on those candidates 
that
have not raised over $4 million dollars in a single day, of which my 
family
did their part. I am a WWII and Korean veteran. Capiche! Robert and 
Gloria
Beckett and family.

The debate will be limited to those candidates who have satisfied the
following criteria:

1. Announced a formal campaign for President: and

2. Filed the necessary paperwork with the Federal Election 
Commission; and

3. Met all U.S. constitutional requirements; and

4. Garnered at least 5% of the national electorate as determined by an
average of the most recent national telephone polls of registered 
voters
conducted by non-partisan public opinion polling organizations 
leading up to
the registration deadline as determined by Fox News Channel and the
Republican Party of Iowa or garnered an average of at least 5% in the 
most
recent polls of Iowa voters conducted by the American Research Group 
and the
Des Moines Register.

AND THIS JUST HAPPENS TO COME OUT THE EXACT DAY THAT RON PAUL HAS MADE
HISTORY BY RAISING MORE MONEY IN ONE DAY THAN ANY OTHER 
CANDIDATE!!! !!

THEY KNOW THAT RON PAUL DOESN'T REGISTER IN THESE BOGUS "NATIONAL 
PHONE
POLLS" AND THUS GIVES THEM A PLAUSIBLE REASON TO EXCLUDE HIM FROM THE 
DEBATE
EVEN IN THE FACE OF SUCH OUTSTANDING SUPPORT THAT WAS EVIDENT TODAY!!!

WE ALL MUST DO SOMETHING!!! !!

These are all the contacts in IOWA with the GOP:


State Central  Committee

Ray  Hoffmann Chairman Sioux City
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Leon Mosley Co Chairman Waterloo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Chuck  Laudner Executive Director Des Moines
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Paula Dierenfeld Legal Counsel
Des Moines [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Kathy  Pearson Pres. IFRW Cedar Rapids
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phyllis Kelly, National Committeewoman, Charles City
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Steve Roberts National Committeeman Des Moines
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  First District
Second  District Third  District

  Karl Gilbertson Cedar Falls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Lisa Smith Secretary Ottumwa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Steve Scheffler
West Des  Moines
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[FairfieldLife] Ron Paul Takes a Stand in Iowa by weyrich

[thedoc108]

Ron Paul Takes a Stand in Iowa  
Wednesday, Aug. 22, 2007 

Throughout the years I have received comments in support of Rep. Ron 
Paul, R-Texas. If he makes a major speech, casts a lone vote, or is 
running for re-election, no other political figure has continued to 
have a lasting following more than this unique congressman from 
Texas. 
A regular reader of this commentary asked me to explain why Paul has 
continued to have a following which exceeds that of some of the front-
running candidates in the Ames Iowa straw poll. 
Inasmuch as the enquirer asked his question the week before the Iowa 
straw poll, I thought it fair to offer a few comments about Ron Paul, 
who received very little attention from the national media. 
Indeed, Paul received some 9 percent-10 percent of the vote. But my 
dear friend from the neighboring state of Wisconsin, former Gov. 
Tommy Thompson, put all he had into the poll, and he didn't do as 
well, causing him to withdraw as a presidential candidate. 
And there was Mayor Rudolph (Rudy) Giuliani, the crime fighter from 
New York, and former Sen. Fred D. Thompson, the apparent darling of 
the conservatives, and others who didn't even bother to set foot in 
Iowa, who also ended up with no base in Iowa. And yet here was good 
old Ron Paul, lumbering along, whom no one expected to win, place or 
show, who yet managed to survive the politics of an important 
bellwether state, surviving to fight another day. 
The question is why and that is what Pitts and other readers want to 
know. 
First, Ron Paul is different and that in and of itself draws a 
certain amount of support. 
Second, Ron Paul is a consistent follower of the Constitution, of 
whom there are few. 
Third, Ron Paul represents an authentic point of view, once 
articulated by the late Sen. Robert A. Taft, R-Ohio, and he sticks 
with it. 
Take one of the early debates when Paul nearly got ousted from the 
whole process. Ron Paul said we are under attack in the Middle East 
because we have meddled in that area ourselves. 
He paraphrased the late Sen. Taft by saying we should not be involved 
in wars initiated by other nations. 
Mayor Rudy said he had heard many silly things down through the years 
as to why we are involved in the Middle East but this one tops them 
all. By articulating the authentic Taft view, Ron Paul was nearly 
ousted from further debates. 
In fact, the Michigan State GOP chairman is attempting to bar 
independents from voting in the Michigan Republican primary. That 
would preclude the following that Ron Paul has among independent 
voters in Michigan from so voting. 
It likely would preclude Ron Paul from getting any Michigan votes in 
the Republican National Convention in Minneapolis in early September 
of 2008. 
That is the most reprehensible of all of the moves against Ron Paul. 
If he has a small national following, as apparently he does, so be 
it. But he alone is willing to challenge the interests which have 
come to dominate the Republican Party in recent years. 
Accordingly, Ron Paul has stood alone in recent years in following 
President George Washington's advice never to meddle in foreign 
affairs. Taft took up Washington's cause and paid dearly for it. 
Now only Ron Paul defends what may be termed the authentic Washington—
Taft point of view. 
On the other hand, I never have understood Rep. Paul's many votes 
against our defense system. Some votes against the defense 
establishment in this country, yes, but to vote against defending 
America I cannot understand. 
The Constitution explicitly delegates the federal government the 
power to defend our country. To vote against some military programs, 
sure, but all of them? 
There must be reasonableness and responsibility. 
 

[FairfieldLife] re:jean klein and Ron Paul

[thedoc108]

 I really enjoyed reading the stuff from Jean Klein.
Thanks for posting that.
On a more mundane note: 
I have followed Ron PAul's political life  thru his
brother Wayne Paul who has been my accountant for the
past 12 or 13 years. I would love to see him get
elected. There is a big groundswell moving for him.
If you are not familiar with him know this: the
establishment of republicans hate him because he is
scary to them. He would upset the power structure and
overturn the applecart. If he becomes more prominent
there could be an attempt to assassinate him. He would
be great for America. Check him out if you have not as
yet at  www.ronpaul2008.com

May be in FF in mid to late july. I will stop by the
wed. evening group if it is still ongoing
steve
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis  

[FairfieldLife] Re: Diksha teacher ejected from the dome

[thedoc108]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "heshiepothead" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer  wrote:
> >
> > I mentioned earlier that former Purusha and now diksha teacher David
> > Bousfield had been admitted to the dome. Today, in the middle of
> program,
> > two security guards ushered him out.
> >
> 
> It is truly hard to fathom that this is an organization that claims to
> have the technology to promote world peace. It sounds like an episode
> of  Law and Order.
>
And so thru the window of science we see the dawn of the age of 
enlightenment.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/