Re: [FairfieldLife] "Enlightened" and FFL, continued

2011-11-03 Thread Ravi Yogi
Since making fun of men as being feminine and/or gay seems to be in vogue now I 
feel compelled to share my experiences since my awakening which has made me 
definitely more feminine - though one of the girls I flirted with disagreed, 
quite unequivocally by remarking that I was quite masculine - thanks Jenny but 
you are too young for me - a whole Jupiter cycle  ~ 12 years.

Consequently in the past 2 years I have been hit upon by gay men and I have 
handled it with aplomb - thanking them and quoting.. If I was gay I would have 
loved too... It also gave an understanding of a woman's perspective and how 
they handle men, hitting on them, with such grace.

I have conversely used gay jokes with men, good to use with Indian men since 
there are since they are very bigoted with respect to homosexuality. In fact I 
in jest walked up to an Asian man on the street and remarked that I and a 
friend of mine were not gay. I had an Indian friend of mine who called me gay 
at my reunion. He thought he could make fun of me but I turned the tables on 
him. I said I could turn just gay for him, soon made fun of him calling him a 
bi and asked for his wife's number. After we danced I told other friends that 
he was trying to molest me because he was mad at me for rejecting his 
advances..LOL. Needless to say he would have avoided trying to insult someone 
as a gay for a while :-)

Then there was the more serious case of an older guy, not gay but more of a 
pervert who tried to hit on me. I was full of love and just could not but talk 
very lovingly to him - this was right after my awakening. But the existence 
bailed me out. I was out smoking with my friend Car and when the pervert saw us 
I unconsciously moved towards Car, put a hand on his shoulder and introduced 
him to the pervert. He figured Car was my partner and that was the end of him 
trying to pursue any further..LOL..


Re: [FairfieldLife] "Enlightened" and FFL, continued

2011-11-02 Thread Bhairitu
I probably look at the show a little differently than you though they 
are definitely lampooning zealousness.  Dern would have her experience 
from TM and probably Lynch's zealousness while Mike White has a whole 
different angle.  His dad was a closet gay writer for people like Pat 
Robertson and so probably had Jayzuz thrust down his throat.  Then there 
is the lampooning of corporate America. Even the kayaking thing is a bit 
lampooning and the MC Gainey ("Lost") character as a former TV show 
writer ripping Hollywood.  And of course corporate America is or was 
very into these kayaking things as "team building" events.  Never 
participated in one though the company would have some.  It would have 
been a good way to kill myself. ;-)

And definitely Amy's mom and ex have issues so it is fair to delve into 
those too.  Not to mention her co-workers.

Problem is that it is not a "ha-ha" funny show.  That may limit it to 
one season.   OTOH, "Hung" usually delivers some yucks and this last 
episode had some good ones.

As for much of anyone seeing these series outside of an HBO subscription 
or an illegal torrent they have to wait until dumb ass Time-Warner 
releases them to disc or preferably streaming.  Today there is an 
article about declining revenue at Time-Warner's home video division at 
News.com:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-20128929-261/time-warners-home-video-revenue-plunges

For some reason their execs overvalue their products.  When Hollywood 
Video was still around he told me that Warner did not allow them to sell 
the HBO series at the end of a rental run but had to send them back.  
I'm even sure they were allowed to sell Warner DVDs due to the revenue 
sharing agreement.  Fact is a lot of other studios don't bother with 
such nonsense.

Earlier this year when the 1930's film "Gabriel Over the White House" 
was mentioned on Roger Ebert's "At the Movies" it was not available from 
Netflix or anywhere for that matter.  I was available for $20 as a 
one-off DVD from Warner Classics.  They have  WMV streaming version for 
$15 which you "own" in that you can play it any time you want. But I 
couldn't play it on my BD player so opted for the DVD instead.  I really 
wasn't interested in buying the disc but just watching it.  A Netflix 
streaming version would have been just fine or second to that a DVD 
rental.  But this title never was mass produced on DVD, just VHS.

Pricing content is a high art form and something I think that MBA 
schooled execs are clueless about.  Even my client I have done some game 
ports for when I asked how some of the titles were selling because IMO 
he has them priced too high told me he perceived their value at that.  
Problem is the public doesn't.  And that's who you need to please to 
sell anything.  That doesn't mean you have to give it away either.

On 11/02/2011 02:41 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> To some extent, I've been less charmed by the latest two episodes of
> HBO's "Enlightened" while watching it, but in retrospect I've realized
> that Mike White and Laura Dern *are* still dealing with material that is
> relevant to FFL and to the cult of spiritual narcissism; it's just more
> subtle than in the first 2 episodes.
>
> It's now been a week since Amy has returned from her idyllic (although
> enforced) retreat in Hawaii. Her epiphany -- whatever it was -- had
> faded in significance, and now she's focused on trying to still "live an
> enlightened life" out in the real world. In Ep4, confronted with her
> first weekend, she has to figure out what to do with it.
>
> She first decides to spend it meditating, which gives us a classic (and
> hilarious) opportunity to listen to her inner thoughts" in pretty much
> the classic TMer meditation. That is, all thoughts, no silence, all
> trivia and self-involvement. Her first thoughts are about being 40 and
> having wrinkles. Then she "comes back to the mantra" and tries to
> visualize something more positive, and lapses into thoughts of a happier
> time. But then, inspired by visions of that happy time, she sets out to
> recreate this fantasy happier time. And that's where the trouble begins.
>
> She phones her ex-husband in the middle of the night, waking him, and
> tells him that he's just got to go off river rafting with her. At 7:00
> AM the next morning. And here's where the connection to TM and to
> cultism comes in; she doesn't *ask* him whether he wants to go, she
> tells him that he needs to, and makes the reservations herself. Being
> essentially a nice guy, he thinks she's crazy, but agrees to go anyway.
> They get there, are out on the river, and for a few minutes both are
> feeling a little of the fantasy happiness she was seeking.
>
> But then reality intrudes. She finds that he brought along a bag full of
> drugs and, offended in the way that only a New Age twif can be offended,
> throws them away. He goes ballistic, and storms away, her following. As
> he finds a new stash and gets high, she harangues h

[FairfieldLife] "Enlightened" and FFL, continued

2011-11-02 Thread turquoiseb
To some extent, I've been less charmed by the latest two episodes of
HBO's "Enlightened" while watching it, but in retrospect I've realized
that Mike White and Laura Dern *are* still dealing with material that is
relevant to FFL and to the cult of spiritual narcissism; it's just more
subtle than in the first 2 episodes.

It's now been a week since Amy has returned from her idyllic (although
enforced) retreat in Hawaii. Her epiphany -- whatever it was -- had
faded in significance, and now she's focused on trying to still "live an
enlightened life" out in the real world. In Ep4, confronted with her
first weekend, she has to figure out what to do with it.

She first decides to spend it meditating, which gives us a classic (and
hilarious) opportunity to listen to her inner thoughts" in pretty much
the classic TMer meditation. That is, all thoughts, no silence, all
trivia and self-involvement. Her first thoughts are about being 40 and
having wrinkles. Then she "comes back to the mantra" and tries to
visualize something more positive, and lapses into thoughts of a happier
time. But then, inspired by visions of that happy time, she sets out to
recreate this fantasy happier time. And that's where the trouble begins.

She phones her ex-husband in the middle of the night, waking him, and
tells him that he's just got to go off river rafting with her. At 7:00
AM the next morning. And here's where the connection to TM and to
cultism comes in; she doesn't *ask* him whether he wants to go, she
tells him that he needs to, and makes the reservations herself. Being
essentially a nice guy, he thinks she's crazy, but agrees to go anyway.
They get there, are out on the river, and for a few minutes both are
feeling a little of the fantasy happiness she was seeking.

But then reality intrudes. She finds that he brought along a bag full of
drugs and, offended in the way that only a New Age twif can be offended,
throws them away. He goes ballistic, and storms away, her following. As
he finds a new stash and gets high, she harangues him with what a
low-life he is, continually insisting that she's doing it for his own
good, trying to get him to become the person he could be. Problem is,
it's not the person he wants to be. From his POV (and, by this time, the
audience's), *she* is the one living in a delusional world, and worse,
she's consistently treating not only him but *everyone* around her as if
they're lesser than she is. The *only* way she can imagine interfacing
with these "lesser" people is to try to convert them, to infect them
with her hypomania and make them more like her. Fortunately Levi (Luke
Wilson) finally has it up to here with her condescending, superior BS
and tells her to fuck off and leave him alone. He tells her something
she has never realized, that the way she sees him makes him feel like
shit, because she sees him *as* shit, compared to her and her new
fantasy lifestyle.

That's where I think the real connection to FFL -- especially recently
-- comes in. This place has been a hotbed of people asserting that they
not only have the right to try to change people they don't like, they've
been asserting that it's some kind of ethical or moral duty, and that
anyone who *doesn't* "do as they do" and try to impose their view of how
things should be on others is ethically deficient.

Bzt. As Curtis has pointed out so well, this just does not compute.
The only environment in which such a 'tude *does* compute is a cult,
especially one that has a history of treating its members like children
who "need" to be corrected by their betters. In other words, the TM
movement.

Such a sense of entitlement has no place on a forum composed of adults.
Adults don't really need anyone to "stand up for them" when someone says
something about them that they might not agree with. Adults suck it up
and realize that the other person's view of them is just as valid as
their own. They don't go around trying to impose their values on other
people; they just do what adults do, try to do their best to live up to
their own values, and allow others to do the same. Groups can't become
cults if the people in them act like adults. They can only become cults
if most of them act like children, and as if the gurus and the fellow
cultists around them trying to make them "more like them" are right.

Me, in this rap and in any of my others, I'm not trying to change any of
you and make you more like anything, much less me. All I do occasionally
is point out that there are many on this forum who ARE trying to change
you and make you more like them. If you like that, and like being
treated like children by those who feel that they are entitled to treat
you that way, go for it. I'm going to -- as Curtis suggests -- focus
more on ignoring the "entitled" and hanging out with folks who are a
little more like adults.





[FairfieldLife] "Enlightened" and FFL, continued

2011-10-12 Thread turquoiseb
Since my first posts about this new HBO series seem to 
have generated a veritable firestorm of overreaction
and hysteria, I might as well continue talking about it.  :-)

The more I see the overreaction to what I wrote here
on FFL (most of it from people who haven't even seen 
the series themselves), the more respect I have for 
Mike White and Laura Dern, creators of the series. 
They *could* have taken the low road, and tried to
create only a parody of the New Age and all things 
spiritual. Lord knows they need to be parodied and 
made fun of, for their own good, but still that's 
just so easy to pull off there is no challenge in it.

What they did instead is to create the character of
Amy and make her more multi-dimensional, more real. 
Yes, she's nuttier than a fruitcake. "Before enlight-
enment, scream like a madwoman and act crazy; after
enlightenment, scream like a madwoman and act crazy."
But she may have ALSO had a realization experience 
of some kind while in that Hawaiian Woo Woo ashram. 

The questions that thus might be dealt with in the 
series (I've only seen one episode, after all, and 
can only speculate about the rest) are big ones:

* Does having had a realization experience or 
having become enlightened actually MATTER? 

* Will or should anyone treat you differently
if/when you become enlightened?

So far in the series, the answers to both questions 
are "No." Amy is as insufferable enlightened as she
was unenlightened. Having read reviews that reveal a 
bit of next week's episode, when she arrives at work
expecting her bit of blackmail to have worked and be
put into a management position, she's going to be 
shown to a dark, dingy basement and given a job in
data entry. 

So how is one of the "enlightened" going to react to 
being treated just like everyone else, and be required
to do repetitive, unrewarding work, just like everyone
else? My bet is...uh...not well. Should be funny.

But when you think about it, isn't this really a strong
parallel to what we've seen on FFL many times? People
show up here claiming to be enlightened, and expecting
to be treated the way that they believe the enlightened
"should" be treated. That is, with rapt awe and respect,
and as if every word they write is precious knowledge 
conferred on us by our betters. 

And that doesn't happen. 

Instead, the world looks at these pompous enlightenment
pretenders and judges them the same way they'd judge
anyone else -- by their actual behavior and what they
actually say and do. What the "enlightened" CLAIM 
about their inner experiences or their own state of 
consciousness doesn't mean shit; on FFL only what they 
actually DO matters. 

Same in "Enlightened," the TV series. Amy can believe 
she's enlightened all she wants to, but the world is 
going to treat her the way it winds up treating her. She
doesn't get any special breaks for having had some nifty
subjective experience. It should be interesting to watch
how she deals with this. One thing is sure -- Amy simply
CANNOT POSSIBLY react to others disbelieving in her 
enlightenment any worse than her fellow enlightenment 
pretenders on FFL have -- in the past and in the present. 

The parallels should make watching -- and continuing to 
report on -- this TV series really fun.