Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
On Dec 20, 2012, at 7:19 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:48 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: Ravi, I can always count on your heart. Here is a secret. You can always count on mine. Thanks for the laugh and the insight. Well thank you Curtis - your comments have been duly registered, notarized and filed. Come at me as hard as you want now. We always know this place is an option. Awesome - I love it !!! You are indeed a worthy opponent. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:28 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: I know I'm not the guy you want to hear this from, but that was really funny. It made me laugh for real. Something surreal about it, like a Picasso in words. Something genuinely clever. And although I may not agree with your perspective, you kind of earned the right to lay it down with your vulnerable 2008. Nice one. Thanks Curtis, that was nice and I loved it. FYI - the minute I hear, read someone praise me, the narcissistic cells in my brain instantaneously fire causing me lot of joy so I don't discriminate or to be accurate my narcissistic cells don't discriminate - my thinking brain cells are at peace with my narcissistic brain cells. Having said that - you have to understand when I read your next post and depending on the content, in the absence of any praise I will most likely come hard at you. But this praise will not be forgotten, it has been duly registered and there will be a touch of softness when I come after you..LOL.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: You are on to something Steve. It connects with my comments about her emotional intelligence. She will not be able to understand what you are saying here. Actually, no, Curtis, what Steve is claiming does not require emotional intelligence to understand. He's simply saying that I haven't revealed many details of my life outside of FFL. That's a factual matter, not one that takes emotional insight to decide. Here's what he said to start with: And what I have reflected on recently, is that even though you are, far and away, the most prolific poster here, we really know nothing about you, other than your unending corrections. Other people here, in the course of posting reveal interesting aspects about their lives. Not so with you. I wonder what that means? I mean 20 years, and we know you live in New Jersey, and like classical music. He is, of course, wrong. I've revealed, as I said, plenty about my life over the years. And you, of course, know that; you also know your remark above is wrong. You have been engaging in a virtual orgy of deliberate dishonesty in the past few days, both factual and intellectual. That's what typically happens when you have been under fire here; it seems to be what you are compelled to resort to when you're feeling off-balance. (Steve is more likely than not to back Curtis up about what he meant; if so, he won't be telling the truth either.) Evidently not. But it's funny, I can tell you many things about Ann, Emily, Curtis, Barry, Share, Jim, Ravi, Alex, Dixon, but I can't think of anything much you've revealed about your life. Sure, we know you political views, and, well, its true, you did talk about your issue with Crones disease, (if I have that straight), but those details are few and far between given the amount of posting you do. I stand by my observation that you reveal little about yourself, other than your stance on current events, and your other posting priorities. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@wrote: Other people here, in the course of posting reveal interesting aspects about their lives. Not so with you. I wonder what that means? It means you haven't been paying attention. Sorry, but I've said plenty about my life.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: You are on to something Steve. It connects with my comments about her emotional intelligence. She will not be able to understand what you are saying here. Well, I've been thinking about this. And I don't think it is inappropriate. But here is what I know about Judy. Second hand, I've picked up that she is from New Jersy. First hand, I've picked up that she once lived in NYC, that she has a sister, that her dad was in academia, and was a scholar of classical music, particularly Wagner. I probably have some of the particulars wrong on that, but I picked this up from a back and forth she had with Feste sometime back. I've recently learned that sometime back she had an issue with Crohn's disease, but that she has not had any symptoms for going on twelve years. I know a little of her background with TM. But other than these, I can't recall too many other details. And so, I have much more limited picture of Judy than probably anyone else who posts on a regular basis. And along these lines, I think that putting it out there as many of us do, allows us derive greater benefit from the site. There is always the risk of TMI, but I don't think that happens too often. Anyway, I appreciate that so many are willing to offer glimpses into their worlds. It makes the site much more enjoyable IMHO. Along those lines, we just had our company lunch for our employees (around 10), and customers. It went really well, but these last weeks of getting presents for customers, providing some meals for customers, is always stressful, and I'm glad it's just about over. Evidently not. But it's funny, I can tell you many things about Ann, Emily, Curtis, Barry, Share, Jim, Ravi, Alex, Dixon, but I can't think of anything much you've revealed about your life. Sure, we know you political views, and, well, its true, you did talk about your issue with Crones disease, (if I have that straight), but those details are few and far between given the amount of posting you do. I stand by my observation that you reveal little about yourself, other than your stance on current events, and your other posting priorities. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Other people here, in the course of posting reveal interesting aspects about their lives. Not so with you. I wonder what that means? It means you haven't been paying attention. Sorry, but I've said plenty about my life.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
Steve, I have no explanation for why you are unable to recall as many details of what I've said about my life as you can about what others have said about their lives, but I reiterate: the FACT is that I've given as many such details as most here, and more than some. And unless Curtis is suffering from the same oddly selective failure of memory that you are, he knows this is the case. He knows you aren't onto anything, and he also knows his emotional intelligence remark has not a single thing to do with the issue, the understanding of which does not require emotional intelligence. As I pointed out to him, he has been indulging in more deliberate dishonesty than usual the past few days, I suspect because he isn't feeling very good about himself. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: You are on to something Steve. It connects with my comments about her emotional intelligence. She will not be able to understand what you are saying here. Well, I've been thinking about this. And I don't think it is inappropriate. But here is what I know about Judy. Second hand, I've picked up that she is from New Jersy. First hand, I've picked up that she once lived in NYC, that she has a sister, that her dad was in academia, and was a scholar of classical music, particularly Wagner. I probably have some of the particulars wrong on that, but I picked this up from a back and forth she had with Feste sometime back. I've recently learned that sometime back she had an issue with Crohn's disease, but that she has not had any symptoms for going on twelve years. I know a little of her background with TM. But other than these, I can't recall too many other details. And so, I have much more limited picture of Judy than probably anyone else who posts on a regular basis. And along these lines, I think that putting it out there as many of us do, allows us derive greater benefit from the site. There is always the risk of TMI, but I don't think that happens too often. Anyway, I appreciate that so many are willing to offer glimpses into their worlds. It makes the site much more enjoyable IMHO. Along those lines, we just had our company lunch for our employees (around 10), and customers. It went really well, but these last weeks of getting presents for customers, providing some meals for customers, is always stressful, and I'm glad it's just about over. Evidently not. But it's funny, I can tell you many things about Ann, Emily, Curtis, Barry, Share, Jim, Ravi, Alex, Dixon, but I can't think of anything much you've revealed about your life. Sure, we know you political views, and, well, its true, you did talk about your issue with Crones disease, (if I have that straight), but those details are few and far between given the amount of posting you do. I stand by my observation that you reveal little about yourself, other than your stance on current events, and your other posting priorities. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Other people here, in the course of posting reveal interesting aspects about their lives. Not so with you. I wonder what that means? It means you haven't been paying attention. Sorry, but I've said plenty about my life.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
Oh, okay. Maybe you're right. I also recall that you have said that you have sometimes had serious bouts of depression. I also have had periods of depression. Fortunately they haven't lasted long. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: Steve, I have no explanation for why you are unable to recall as many details of what I've said about my life as you can about what others have said about their lives, but I reiterate: the FACT is that I've given as many such details as most here, and more than some. And unless Curtis is suffering from the same oddly selective failure of memory that you are, he knows this is the case. He knows you aren't onto anything, and he also knows his emotional intelligence remark has not a single thing to do with the issue, the understanding of which does not require emotional intelligence. As I pointed out to him, he has been indulging in more deliberate dishonesty than usual the past few days, I suspect because he isn't feeling very good about himself. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: You are on to something Steve. It connects with my comments about her emotional intelligence. She will not be able to understand what you are saying here. Well, I've been thinking about this. And I don't think it is inappropriate. But here is what I know about Judy. Second hand, I've picked up that she is from New Jersy. First hand, I've picked up that she once lived in NYC, that she has a sister, that her dad was in academia, and was a scholar of classical music, particularly Wagner. I probably have some of the particulars wrong on that, but I picked this up from a back and forth she had with Feste sometime back. I've recently learned that sometime back she had an issue with Crohn's disease, but that she has not had any symptoms for going on twelve years. I know a little of her background with TM. But other than these, I can't recall too many other details. And so, I have much more limited picture of Judy than probably anyone else who posts on a regular basis. And along these lines, I think that putting it out there as many of us do, allows us derive greater benefit from the site. There is always the risk of TMI, but I don't think that happens too often. Anyway, I appreciate that so many are willing to offer glimpses into their worlds. It makes the site much more enjoyable IMHO. Along those lines, we just had our company lunch for our employees (around 10), and customers. It went really well, but these last weeks of getting presents for customers, providing some meals for customers, is always stressful, and I'm glad it's just about over. Evidently not. But it's funny, I can tell you many things about Ann, Emily, Curtis, Barry, Share, Jim, Ravi, Alex, Dixon, but I can't think of anything much you've revealed about your life. Sure, we know you political views, and, well, its true, you did talk about your issue with Crones disease, (if I have that straight), but those details are few and far between given the amount of posting you do. I stand by my observation that you reveal little about yourself, other than your stance on current events, and your other posting priorities. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Other people here, in the course of posting reveal interesting aspects about their lives. Not so with you. I wonder what that means? It means you haven't been paying attention. Sorry, but I've said plenty about my life.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote: Oh, okay. Maybe you're right. Thank you. I also recall that you have said that you have sometimes had serious bouts of depression. One bout of clinical depression, yes, over 40 years ago, before I began TM. Took about a year to clear up, never came back, thank Whoever. I also have had periods of depression. Fortunately they haven't lasted long. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: Steve, I have no explanation for why you are unable to recall as many details of what I've said about my life as you can about what others have said about their lives, but I reiterate: the FACT is that I've given as many such details as most here, and more than some. And unless Curtis is suffering from the same oddly selective failure of memory that you are, he knows this is the case. He knows you aren't onto anything, and he also knows his emotional intelligence remark has not a single thing to do with the issue, the understanding of which does not require emotional intelligence. As I pointed out to him, he has been indulging in more deliberate dishonesty than usual the past few days, I suspect because he isn't feeling very good about himself. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: You are on to something Steve. It connects with my comments about her emotional intelligence. She will not be able to understand what you are saying here. Well, I've been thinking about this. And I don't think it is inappropriate. But here is what I know about Judy. Second hand, I've picked up that she is from New Jersy. First hand, I've picked up that she once lived in NYC, that she has a sister, that her dad was in academia, and was a scholar of classical music, particularly Wagner. I probably have some of the particulars wrong on that, but I picked this up from a back and forth she had with Feste sometime back. I've recently learned that sometime back she had an issue with Crohn's disease, but that she has not had any symptoms for going on twelve years. I know a little of her background with TM. But other than these, I can't recall too many other details. And so, I have much more limited picture of Judy than probably anyone else who posts on a regular basis. And along these lines, I think that putting it out there as many of us do, allows us derive greater benefit from the site. There is always the risk of TMI, but I don't think that happens too often. Anyway, I appreciate that so many are willing to offer glimpses into their worlds. It makes the site much more enjoyable IMHO. Along those lines, we just had our company lunch for our employees (around 10), and customers. It went really well, but these last weeks of getting presents for customers, providing some meals for customers, is always stressful, and I'm glad it's just about over. Evidently not. But it's funny, I can tell you many things about Ann, Emily, Curtis, Barry, Share, Jim, Ravi, Alex, Dixon, but I can't think of anything much you've revealed about your life. Sure, we know you political views, and, well, its true, you did talk about your issue with Crones disease, (if I have that straight), but those details are few and far between given the amount of posting you do. I stand by my observation that you reveal little about yourself, other than your stance on current events, and your other posting priorities. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Other people here, in the course of posting reveal interesting aspects about their lives. Not so with you. I wonder what that means? It means you haven't been paying attention. Sorry, but I've said plenty about my life.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM, authfriend authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote: Oh, okay. Maybe you're right. Thank you. I also recall that you have said that you have sometimes had serious bouts of depression. One bout of clinical depression, yes, over 40 years ago, before I began TM. Took about a year to clear up, never came back, thank Whoever. Perhaps we should construct a Wiki on chronology of FFL members - no easy feat this :-) ... 1971 - The Raving Yogi is born 1972 - Judy suffers a bout of depression ... 1995 - Barry begins a paranoid, obsessive feud with Judy ... 2008 - The Raving Yogi suffers a bout of depression .. 2012 - Steve launches an obsessive campaign on Judy's personal details ..
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Perhaps we should construct a Wiki on chronology of FFL members - no easy feat this :-) ... 1971 - The Raving Yogi is born 1972 - Judy suffers a bout of depression 1975 - Maharishi Inaugurates the Dawn of The Age of Enlightenment 1977 - Maitreya creates a Mayavirupa body and travels to the West 1995 - Barry begins a paranoid, obsessive feud with Judy ... 2008 - The Raving Yogi suffers a bout of depression .. 2012 - Steve launches an obsessive campaign on Judy's personal details ..
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: I know I'm not the guy you want to hear this from, but that was really funny. It made me laugh for real. Something surreal about it, like a Picasso in words. Something genuinely clever. And although I may not agree with your perspective, you kind of earned the right to lay it down with your vulnerable 2008. Nice one. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Oh, okay. Maybe you're right. Thank you. I also recall that you have said that you have sometimes had serious bouts of depression. One bout of clinical depression, yes, over 40 years ago, before I began TM. Took about a year to clear up, never came back, thank Whoever. Perhaps we should construct a Wiki on chronology of FFL members - no easy feat this :-) ... 1971 - The Raving Yogi is born 1972 - Judy suffers a bout of depression ... 1995 - Barry begins a paranoid, obsessive feud with Judy ... 2008 - The Raving Yogi suffers a bout of depression .. 2012 - Steve launches an obsessive campaign on Judy's personal details ..
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Oh, okay. Maybe you're right. Thank you. I also recall that you have said that you have sometimes had serious bouts of depression. One bout of clinical depression, yes, over 40 years ago, before I began TM. Took about a year to clear up, never came back, thank Whoever. [Urk. WHOMever. Even editors need editors.] Perhaps we should construct a Wiki on chronology of FFL members - no easy feat this :-) ... 1971 - The Raving Yogi is born 1972 - Judy suffers a bout of depression What I want to know is, what was it about the one-year-old Raving Yogi that made me so depressed? ... 1995 - Barry begins a paranoid, obsessive feud with Judy ... 2008 - The Raving Yogi suffers a bout of depression .. 2012 - Steve launches an obsessive campaign on Judy's personal details ..
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Oh, okay. Maybe you're right. Thank you. I also recall that you have said that you have sometimes had serious bouts of depression. One bout of clinical depression, yes, over 40 years ago, before I began TM. Took about a year to clear up, never came back, thank Whoever. [Urk. WHOMever. Even editors need editors.] Perhaps we should construct a Wiki on chronology of FFL members - no easy feat this :-) ... 1971 - The Raving Yogi is born 1972 - Judy suffers a bout of depression What I want to know is, what was it about the one-year-old Raving Yogi that made me so depressed? And even Judy coming through! The doomed Mayans may have been right after all. Seriously, nice one too. ... 1995 - Barry begins a paranoid, obsessive feud with Judy ... 2008 - The Raving Yogi suffers a bout of depression .. 2012 - Steve launches an obsessive campaign on Judy's personal details ..
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:28 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: I know I'm not the guy you want to hear this from, but that was really funny. It made me laugh for real. Something surreal about it, like a Picasso in words. Something genuinely clever. And although I may not agree with your perspective, you kind of earned the right to lay it down with your vulnerable 2008. Nice one. Thanks Curtis, that was nice and I loved it. FYI - the minute I hear, read someone praise me, the narcissistic cells in my brain instantaneously fire causing me lot of joy so I don't discriminate or to be accurate my narcissistic cells don't discriminate - my thinking brain cells are at peace with my narcissistic brain cells. Having said that - you have to understand when I read your next post and depending on the content, in the absence of any praise I will most likely come hard at you. But this praise will not be forgotten, it has been duly registered and there will be a touch of softness when I come after you..LOL. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Oh, okay. Maybe you're right. Thank you. I also recall that you have said that you have sometimes had serious bouts of depression. One bout of clinical depression, yes, over 40 years ago, before I began TM. Took about a year to clear up, never came back, thank Whoever. Perhaps we should construct a Wiki on chronology of FFL members - no easy feat this :-) ... 1971 - The Raving Yogi is born 1972 - Judy suffers a bout of depression ... 1995 - Barry begins a paranoid, obsessive feud with Judy ... 2008 - The Raving Yogi suffers a bout of depression .. 2012 - Steve launches an obsessive campaign on Judy's personal details ..
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Ravi, I can always count on your heart. Here is a secret. You can always count on mine. Thanks for the laugh and the insight. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:28 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: I know I'm not the guy you want to hear this from, but that was really funny. It made me laugh for real. Something surreal about it, like a Picasso in words. Something genuinely clever. And although I may not agree with your perspective, you kind of earned the right to lay it down with your vulnerable 2008. Nice one. Thanks Curtis, that was nice and I loved it. FYI - the minute I hear, read someone praise me, the narcissistic cells in my brain instantaneously fire causing me lot of joy so I don't discriminate or to be accurate my narcissistic cells don't discriminate - my thinking brain cells are at peace with my narcissistic brain cells. Having said that - you have to understand when I read your next post and depending on the content, in the absence of any praise I will most likely come hard at you. But this praise will not be forgotten, it has been duly registered and there will be a touch of softness when I come after you..LOL. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Oh, okay. Maybe you're right. Thank you. I also recall that you have said that you have sometimes had serious bouts of depression. One bout of clinical depression, yes, over 40 years ago, before I began TM. Took about a year to clear up, never came back, thank Whoever. Perhaps we should construct a Wiki on chronology of FFL members - no easy feat this :-) ... 1971 - The Raving Yogi is born 1972 - Judy suffers a bout of depression ... 1995 - Barry begins a paranoid, obsessive feud with Judy ... 2008 - The Raving Yogi suffers a bout of depression .. 2012 - Steve launches an obsessive campaign on Judy's personal details ..
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Oh, okay. Maybe you're right. Thank you. I also recall that you have said that you have sometimes had serious bouts of depression. One bout of clinical depression, yes, over 40 years ago, before I began TM. Took about a year to clear up, never came back, thank Whoever. [Urk. WHOMever. Even editors need editors.] Perhaps we should construct a Wiki on chronology of FFL members - no easy feat this :-) ... 1971 - The Raving Yogi is born 1972 - Judy suffers a bout of depression What I want to know is, what was it about the one-year-old Raving Yogi that made me so depressed? Christ Woman, now you have me laughing. Let's build on this... ... 1995 - Barry begins a paranoid, obsessive feud with Judy ... 2008 - The Raving Yogi suffers a bout of depression .. 2012 - Steve launches an obsessive campaign on Judy's personal details ..
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:47 PM, authfriend authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Oh, okay. Maybe you're right. Thank you. I also recall that you have said that you have sometimes had serious bouts of depression. One bout of clinical depression, yes, over 40 years ago, before I began TM. Took about a year to clear up, never came back, thank Whoever. [Urk. WHOMever. Even editors need editors.] Perhaps we should construct a Wiki on chronology of FFL members - no easy feat this :-) ... 1971 - The Raving Yogi is born 1972 - Judy suffers a bout of depression What I want to know is, what was it about the one-year-old Raving Yogi that made me so depressed? Well Judy, that's a good one - obviously your statement on a bout of depression 40 years ago got me thinking about my childhood since I'm 41 and also on my own depression. So it served as a writing prompt for me and thank you for that. ... 1995 - Barry begins a paranoid, obsessive feud with Judy ... 2008 - The Raving Yogi suffers a bout of depression .. 2012 - Steve launches an obsessive campaign on Judy's personal details ..
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:48 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Ravi, I can always count on your heart. Here is a secret. You can always count on mine. Thanks for the laugh and the insight. Well thank you Curtis - your comments have been duly registered, notarized and filed. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:28 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: I know I'm not the guy you want to hear this from, but that was really funny. It made me laugh for real. Something surreal about it, like a Picasso in words. Something genuinely clever. And although I may not agree with your perspective, you kind of earned the right to lay it down with your vulnerable 2008. Nice one. Thanks Curtis, that was nice and I loved it. FYI - the minute I hear, read someone praise me, the narcissistic cells in my brain instantaneously fire causing me lot of joy so I don't discriminate or to be accurate my narcissistic cells don't discriminate - my thinking brain cells are at peace with my narcissistic brain cells. Having said that - you have to understand when I read your next post and depending on the content, in the absence of any praise I will most likely come hard at you. But this praise will not be forgotten, it has been duly registered and there will be a touch of softness when I come after you..LOL.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:48 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: Ravi, I can always count on your heart. Here is a secret. You can always count on mine. Thanks for the laugh and the insight. Well thank you Curtis - your comments have been duly registered, notarized and filed. Come at me as hard as you want now. We always know this place is an option. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:28 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: I know I'm not the guy you want to hear this from, but that was really funny. It made me laugh for real. Something surreal about it, like a Picasso in words. Something genuinely clever. And although I may not agree with your perspective, you kind of earned the right to lay it down with your vulnerable 2008. Nice one. Thanks Curtis, that was nice and I loved it. FYI - the minute I hear, read someone praise me, the narcissistic cells in my brain instantaneously fire causing me lot of joy so I don't discriminate or to be accurate my narcissistic cells don't discriminate - my thinking brain cells are at peace with my narcissistic brain cells. Having said that - you have to understand when I read your next post and depending on the content, in the absence of any praise I will most likely come hard at you. But this praise will not be forgotten, it has been duly registered and there will be a touch of softness when I come after you..LOL.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Whatever Steve - your retorts are always so lame, pathetic, idiotic and you only have one context - your idiotic context. okay, what's next Whereas I am burdened with a complex set of emotions even for a stranger like Steve, someone who posts on FFL. good, good. we haven't seen the martyr angle played before. this is something new. Your posts make me wince, I feel so sorry for you lot of times. But then the mayhem you cause with you stupidity again compels me to post with anger. You seem so hopeless, useless - sometimes I deeply contemplate on the value people like you bring to this Universe - I feel sad, feel lot of pain but I can feel the futility of this pain, and the futility of my posts and futility of my anger and all emotions at your idiotic posts. But then I'm alive, intelligent, open, vulnerable. expanding on the martyr theme, with the renaissance man twist at the end. Nicely Done! And then I see someone like you - it seems such a blessing to be an idiot - no burden, no guilt, no accountability for your actions. No sense of any contemplation, reflection, debate. landing was a little weak. nothing new here. God bless the idiots !!! and the crowd give polite applause. Ravi Chivkula with one of standard performances. the commentators note that he has deleted the retard move from his latest performances. Why do you think that is Don Well Bill, he had been getting some flak for that move. Some judges just felt it was outdated. I understand Don. Well it was a mainstay of his performances We all noticed that Bill. But he's filled in with some of his other patented moves. Basically doubling down on some of his other basics Thanks Bill. But the martyr play. We haven't seen that. I think we'll be watching to see if this becomes a part of his his regular routine Thanks Don On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:32 PM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@...wrote: ** Oh, and Ravi, I have a confession to make. I do believe you use the word retard, in an ok way. I know that others feel the word should not be used, but I am not offended by it. So, I don't want to crimp your style. If you feel you need to use it in your responses to me, go right ahead. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wVagQ_LVd4 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Ah Ravi, You are right on cue. I did have a revelation, Ravi, I am thinking you may feel a little out of place here. You know, the fact that most of us have some common past or present experience with TM and MMY. Would you like it if we set aside some time to talk about Amma issues. We can talk about the guy who died while being in police custody after allegedly approaching Amma in a threatening manner. Or we can talk about possible misappropiations of money by Amma with regards to her family. You can decide the subject matter. In fact, you might even want to give us the questions you would like us to ask you. And we can respond, Wow Ravi, that is so insightful, or Ravi, can you elaborate on that? And then after a time, we can go back to our normal discussions. What do you think? We could call it the Ravi Hour, or something. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility Just fucking speak for yourself Steve baby because this we of yours is a fantasy of yours whereas there's a real we out there that thinks you are RLY STOOOPID - seriously. I think it's Judy Durga's compassion that she makes up these cute humorous variations of really stupid so you idiots will not be offended, I always fucking reach for idiots's jugular. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:32 PM, seventhray27 wrote: Ah, Judy, you're a lover. But let me congratulate you. You really stretched yourself. You waited all this time to lash out at me. That was not easy, I'm sure. BTW, I didn't care about LG's error of attribution. I didn't care about this context, that you are so sanctimonius about. You define context as it suits you. That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility. I was just making a point that depending on how you feel about a person you play your RLY STOOOPID card. It is one of your hallmarks. But, attempting to be positive, none of this detracts from the fact that you've shown some restraint in launching your weekly tirades. So, that's good.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Not that this will make any sense to you Steve. You are the most unintelligent poster on FFL - it's not I who feel out of place here - you are simply projecting - you do, you feel out of place here, among the intelligent posters. You need appreciation, admiration. Every place is Ravi place and every hour is Ravi hour, I'm totally at ease at a night club or a temple because I'm not a victim of any belief system or any fear, insecurity, anxiety. I have intentionally explored all places after 2009 to test the limits of my freedom and continue to do so. Oh Ravi, this is, is, is so moving. I feel like standing at attention and saying the Pledge of Alligence or something. Don, what do you make of this Well Bill, obviously he feels he's got something with this martyr move. We see him expanding on that here Right Don, but he's also doubling down on the Renaissance Man play. We haven't really seen him combine these in this manner in the past. Bill, we'll have to just watch and see how it plays out
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
Restoring what Steve snipped: Ann wrote: Hey, no biggie. I have made plenty of oversights and mistakes but I was a bit disconcerted to think people (yourself and Share) were 'on me' for having this discussion with Curtis which I felt was honest and searching. There is plenty of crazy negativity and projecting here at our alma mater we call FFL but there doesn't have to be even MORE created where there is none. But like I said, I am sure to be the one to make the next blooper so I better not say I told you so! Steve wrote: Hey, I guess this is what you call a gracious and classy reply, instead of what we might have expected from Judy along the lines how how RALY, REALY STOOOPID someone is for making an innocent mistake. But that would be the Judester for ya. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- Steve's post is from four days ago; I didn't comment on it when it was first posted, but now that Xeno has quoted it in his own post, I'll respond. Steve, you're looking RELY RLY STOPID here because you didn't bother to check the context. Yours was not an innocent mistake because you were attempting to make a putdown; and if you'd checked the context, you'd have seen that laughinggull's mistake was *also* in aid of an attempted putdown, hence not innocent either. I don't usually call people STOOOPID for making innocent mistakes. Ah, Judy, you're a lover. But let me congratulate you. You really stretched yourself. You waited all this time to lash out at me. You meant to write, of course, to respond to my gratuitous attack on you, Steve. That was not easy, I'm sure. Wrong. I was busy with other things. You're very easy to ignore, Steve. BTW, I didn't care about LG's error of attribution. I didn't care about this context, that you are so sanctimonius about. Right. That's why your post was RELY REEELY STOOOPID, Steve. You define context as it suits you. Throat-clearing. Meaningless, Steve. That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility. That's REEELY REEELY STOOOPID, Steve. I was just making a point that depending on how you feel about a person you play your RLY STOOOPID card. It is one of your hallmarks. Wrong. Other way around, Steve. But, attempting to be positive, none of this detracts from the fact that you've shown some restraint in launching your weekly tirades. So, that's good. Wrong again, as noted, Steve. This Yahoo formatting makes it difficult to follow the dialogue, but from what I gather below, you are setting the record straight in some manner or another. It was a comment on Barry's post, Steve. (I won't bother to reformat what he wrote because it's just an undifferentiated mass of toxic spew; see Xeno's comment at the end.) Now, as for all the mistakes Barry makes in his post quoted below, they are most assuredly not innocent, both because the post is one of his rage-filled, out-of-control, incoherent putdowns, and because *he knows what he's saying is not true*. Barry wrote: What I find fascinating is that Ann SO misses the point. That is, that what *she* calls an honest and searching discussion is very much in the model of Robin's confrontations, and what Curtis and others have termed boundary violations. The essence of them is, I'm going to say things about you that are negative and demeaning, and it's OK because I really believe them to be true. Now *your* job is to respond defensively to them and have an argument with me, so that I can demonstrate my superiority to you. She doesn't even GET that she's being consistently bitchy, mean, and pretending to be oh-so-superior to the people she tries to lure into arguments with her. This is the act that many of us are so tired of here. WE DON'T OWE YOU SHIT, much less an argument, just because you want to have one. We certainly don't owe you one when you hide your argument-provoking behind a mask of having an honest and searching discussion. You (meaning Ann, Robin, Jimbo, Ravi, Raunchydog, and others who specialize in this form of discussion) have the right to say whatever you want about us, because that is guaranteed by Rick's anything goes guidelines for Fairfield Life. What you seem to be forgetting is *our* right to blow you off like the aggressive, bitchy argument addicts you are, and to ignore your silly asses. If you find this failure to pay attention to you and your obsessions offensive, or even an insult...GOOD. If that is the case, you may actually be (belatedly) getting the point. The whole *concept* of people waiting impatiently in front of their computers (as we all know Judy is), waiting for the new posting week to start so that they can rip into another of their enemies is FUCKIN' EMBARRASSING. Judy
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
Hey Judy, I hope you feel edified by what you wrote below, because I lost interest after about one minute, (second really), but I'm sure it was a repeat of what you have written thousands of times before in the course of your twenty years of being, perhaps, the most prolific poster in a public forum. Fortunately, we have the fifty post limit invented by Rick and confirmed by a majority of participants here, otherwise we would be subjected to possibly hundreds of these vital corrections and unerring observations in a given week. And what I have reflected on recently, is that even though you are, far and away, the most prolific poster here, we really know nothing about you, other than your unending corrections. Other people here, in the course of posting reveal interesting aspects about their lives. Not so with you. I wonder what that means? I mean 20 years, and we know you live in New Jersey, and like classical music. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: Restoring what Steve snipped: Ann wrote: Hey, no biggie. I have made plenty of oversights and mistakes but I was a bit disconcerted to think people (yourself and Share) were 'on me' for having this discussion with Curtis which I felt was honest and searching. There is plenty of crazy negativity and projecting here at our alma mater we call FFL but there doesn't have to be even MORE created where there is none. But like I said, I am sure to be the one to make the next blooper so I better not say I told you so! Steve wrote: Hey, I guess this is what you call a gracious and classy reply, instead of what we might have expected from Judy along the lines how how RALY, REALY STOOOPID someone is for making an innocent mistake. But that would be the Judester for ya. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- Steve's post is from four days ago; I didn't comment on it when it was first posted, but now that Xeno has quoted it in his own post, I'll respond. Steve, you're looking RELY RLY STOPID here because you didn't bother to check the context. Yours was not an innocent mistake because you were attempting to make a putdown; and if you'd checked the context, you'd have seen that laughinggull's mistake was *also* in aid of an attempted putdown, hence not innocent either. I don't usually call people STOOOPID for making innocent mistakes. Ah, Judy, you're a lover. But let me congratulate you. You really stretched yourself. You waited all this time to lash out at me. You meant to write, of course, to respond to my gratuitous attack on you, Steve. That was not easy, I'm sure. Wrong. I was busy with other things. You're very easy to ignore, Steve. BTW, I didn't care about LG's error of attribution. I didn't care about this context, that you are so sanctimonius about. Right. That's why your post was RELY REEELY STOOOPID, Steve. You define context as it suits you. Throat-clearing. Meaningless, Steve. That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility. That's REEELY REEELY STOOOPID, Steve. I was just making a point that depending on how you feel about a person you play your RLY STOOOPID card. It is one of your hallmarks. Wrong. Other way around, Steve. But, attempting to be positive, none of this detracts from the fact that you've shown some restraint in launching your weekly tirades. So, that's good. Wrong again, as noted, Steve. This Yahoo formatting makes it difficult to follow the dialogue, but from what I gather below, you are setting the record straight in some manner or another. It was a comment on Barry's post, Steve. (I won't bother to reformat what he wrote because it's just an undifferentiated mass of toxic spew; see Xeno's comment at the end.) Now, as for all the mistakes Barry makes in his post quoted below, they are most assuredly not innocent, both because the post is one of his rage-filled, out-of-control, incoherent putdowns, and because *he knows what he's saying is not true*. Barry wrote: What I find fascinating is that Ann SO misses the point. That is, that what *she* calls an honest and searching discussion is very much in the model of Robin's confrontations, and what Curtis and others have termed boundary violations. The essence of them is, I'm going to say things about you that are negative and demeaning, and it's OK because I really believe them to be true. Now *your* job is to respond defensively to them and have an argument with me, so that I can demonstrate my superiority to you. She doesn't even GET that she's being consistently bitchy, mean, and pretending to be oh-so-superior to the people she tries to lure into arguments
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote: snip Other people here, in the course of posting reveal interesting aspects about their lives. Not so with you. I wonder what that means? It means you haven't been paying attention. Sorry, but I've said plenty about my life.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
Evidently not. But it's funny, I can tell you many things about Ann, Emily, Curtis, Barry, Share, Jim, Ravi, Alex, Dixon, but I can't think of anything much you've revealed about your life. Sure, we know you political views, and, well, its true, you did talk about your issue with Crones disease, (if I have that straight), but those details are few and far between given the amount of posting you do. I stand by my observation that you reveal little about yourself, other than your stance on current events, and your other posting priorities. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: Other people here, in the course of posting reveal interesting aspects about their lives. Not so with you. I wonder what that means? It means you haven't been paying attention. Sorry, but I've said plenty about my life.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote: Evidently not. But it's funny, I can tell you many things about Ann, Emily, Curtis, Barry, Share, Jim, Ravi, Alex, Dixon, but I can't think of anything much you've revealed about your life. Sure, we know you political views, and, well, its true, you did talk about your issue with Crones disease Crohn's disease, and I don't have an issue with it. Barry does. (if I have that straight), but those details are few and far between given the amount of posting you do. I stand by my observation that you reveal little about yourself, other than your stance on current events, and your other posting priorities. Well, sorry, but your observation is incorrect. I know what I've posted about my life. You either didn't read those posts or have forgotten them.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote: Hey, no biggie. I have made plenty of oversights and mistakes but I was a bit disconcerted to think people (yourself and Share) were 'on me' for having this discussion with Curtis which I felt was honest and searching. There is plenty of crazy negativity and projecting here at our alma mater we call FFL but there doesn't have to be even MORE created where there is none. But like I said, I am sure to be the one to make the next blooper so I better not say I told you so! Hey, I guess this is what you call a gracious and classy reply, instead of what we might have expected from Judy along the lines how how RALY, REALY STOOOPID someone is for making an innocent mistake. But that would be the Judester for ya. What I find fascinating is that Ann SO misses the point. That is, that what *she* calls an honest and searching discussion is very much in the model of Robin's confrontations, and what Curtis and others have termed boundary violations. The essence of them is, I'm going to say things about you that are negative and demeaning, and it's OK because I really believe them to be true. Now *your* job is to respond defensively to them and have an argument with me, so that I can demonstrate my superiority to you. She doesn't even GET that she's being consistently bitchy, mean, and pretending to be oh-so-superior to the people she tries to lure into arguments with her. This is the act that many of us are so tired of here. WE DON'T OWE YOU SHIT, much less an argument, just because you want to have one. We certainly don't owe you one when you hide your argument-provoking behind a mask of having an honest and searching discussion. You (meaning Ann, Robin, Jimbo, Ravi, Raunchydog, and others who specialize in this form of discussion) have the right to say whatever you want about us, because that is guaranteed by Rick's anything goes guidelines for Fairfield Life. What you seem to be forgetting is *our* right to blow you off like the aggressive, bitchy argument addicts you are, and to ignore your silly asses. If you find this failure to pay attention to you and your obsessions offensive, or even an insult...GOOD. If that is the case, you may actually be (belatedly) getting the point. The whole *concept* of people waiting impatiently in front of their computers (as we all know Judy is), waiting for the new posting week to start so that they can rip into another of their enemies is FUCKIN' EMBARRASSING. Judy doesn't get this, and never will. Seemingly, neither does Ann. She keeps running the same tired old numbers over and over, in a seemingly never-ending quest to lure people into same boring, unproductive arguments that Robin specialized in trying to provoke and that Judy has built a nearly twenty-year career in provoking. Can you say Low standards in role models? I think you can. Grow the fuck up. Just because you don't like us, or because you insult us as often and in as many ways as you can think of doesn't mean we owe you a response. Curtis has IMO gone out of his way to try to have rational discussions with several people who cannot conceivably be described as rational themselves. That's just the compassionate way that he rolls, and I commend him for having the patience to do so. Me, I'm just not drawn that way. I think the chronic abusers should either grow the fuck up or shut the fuck up. I'm not going to encourage them by responding to their taunts. So, what was this post about? Was it directed to anyone? I think I'll go for a walk. Happy Birthday Barry.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote: Ann wrote: Hey, no biggie. I have made plenty of oversights and mistakes but I was a bit disconcerted to think people (yourself and Share) were 'on me' for having this discussion with Curtis which I felt was honest and searching. There is plenty of crazy negativity and projecting here at our alma mater we call FFL but there doesn't have to be even MORE created where there is none. But like I said, I am sure to be the one to make the next blooper so I better not say I told you so! Steve wrote: Hey, I guess this is what you call a gracious and classy reply, instead of what we might have expected from Judy along the lines how how RALY, REALY STOOOPID someone is for making an innocent mistake. But that would be the Judester for ya. Steve's post is from four days ago; I didn't comment on it when it was first posted, but now that Xeno has quoted it in his own post, I'll respond. Steve, you're looking RELY RLY STOPID here because you didn't bother to check the context. Yours was not an innocent mistake because you were attempting to make a putdown; and if you'd checked the context, you'd have seen that laughinggull's mistake was *also* in aid of an attempted putdown, hence not innocent either. I don't usually call people STOOOPID for making innocent mistakes. Now, as for all the mistakes Barry makes in his post quoted below, they are most assuredly not innocent, both because the post is one of his rage-filled, out- of-control, incoherent putdowns, and because *he knows what he's saying is not true*. Barry wrote: What I find fascinating is that Ann SO misses the point. That is, that what *she* calls an honest and searching discussion is very much in the model of Robin's confrontations, and what Curtis and others have termed boundary violations. The essence of them is, I'm going to say things about you that are negative and demeaning, and it's OK because I really believe them to be true. Now *your* job is to respond defensively to them and have an argument with me, so that I can demonstrate my superiority to you. She doesn't even GET that she's being consistently bitchy, mean, and pretending to be oh-so-superior to the people she tries to lure into arguments with her. This is the act that many of us are so tired of here. WE DON'T OWE YOU SHIT, much less an argument, just because you want to have one. We certainly don't owe you one when you hide your argument-provoking behind a mask of having an honest and searching discussion. You (meaning Ann, Robin, Jimbo, Ravi, Raunchydog, and others who specialize in this form of discussion) have the right to say whatever you want about us, because that is guaranteed by Rick's anything goes guidelines for Fairfield Life. What you seem to be forgetting is *our* right to blow you off like the aggressive, bitchy argument addicts you are, and to ignore your silly asses. If you find this failure to pay attention to you and your obsessions offensive, or even an insult...GOOD. If that is the case, you may actually be (belatedly) getting the point. The whole *concept* of people waiting impatiently in front of their computers (as we all know Judy is), waiting for the new posting week to start so that they can rip into another of their enemies is FUCKIN' EMBARRASSING. Judy doesn't get this, and never will. Seemingly, neither does Ann. She keeps running the same tired old numbers over and over, in a seemingly never-ending quest to lure people into same boring, unproductive arguments that Robin specialized in trying to provoke and that Judy has built a nearly twenty-year career in provoking. Can you say Low standards in role models? I think you can. Grow the fuck up. Just because you don't like us, or because you insult us as often and in as many ways as you can think of doesn't mean we owe you a response. Curtis has IMO gone out of his way to try to have rational discussions with several people who cannot conceivably be described as rational themselves. That's just the compassionate way that he rolls, and I commend him for having the patience to do so. Me, I'm just not drawn that way. I think the chronic abusers should either grow the fuck up or shut the fuck up. I'm not going to encourage them by responding to their taunts. Xeno wrote: So, what was this post about? Was it directed to anyone? I think I'll go for a walk. Happy Birthday Barry.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote: --- Steve's post is from four days ago; I didn't comment on it when it was first posted, but now that Xeno has quoted it in his own post, I'll respond. Steve, you're looking RELY RLY STOPID here because you didn't bother to check the context. Yours was not an innocent mistake because you were attempting to make a putdown; and if you'd checked the context, you'd have seen that laughinggull's mistake was *also* in aid of an attempted putdown, hence not innocent either. I don't usually call people STOOOPID for making innocent mistakes. Ah, Judy, you're a lover. But let me congratulate you. You really stretched yourself. You waited all this time to lash out at me. That was not easy, I'm sure. BTW, I didn't care about LG's error of attribution. I didn't care about this context, that you are so sanctimonius about. You define context as it suits you. That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility. I was just making a point that depending on how you feel about a person you play your RLY STOOOPID card. It is one of your hallmarks. But, attempting to be positive, none of this detracts from the fact that you've shown some restraint in launching your weekly tirades. So, that's good. This Yahoo formatting makes it difficult to follow the dialogue, but from what I gather below, you are setting the record straight in some manner or another. Now, as for all the mistakes Barry makes in his post quoted below, they are most assuredly not innocent, both because the post is one of his rage-filled, out- of-control, incoherent putdowns, and because *he knows what he's saying is not true*. Barry wrote: What I find fascinating is that Ann SO misses the point. That is, that what *she* calls an honest and searching discussion is very much in the model of Robin's confrontations, and what Curtis and others have termed boundary violations. The essence of them is, I'm going to say things about you that are negative and demeaning, and it's OK because I really believe them to be true. Now *your* job is to respond defensively to them and have an argument with me, so that I can demonstrate my superiority to you. She doesn't even GET that she's being consistently bitchy, mean, and pretending to be oh-so-superior to the people she tries to lure into arguments with her. This is the act that many of us are so tired of here. WE DON'T OWE YOU SHIT, much less an argument, just because you want to have one. We certainly don't owe you one when you hide your argument-provoking behind a mask of having an honest and searching discussion. You (meaning Ann, Robin, Jimbo, Ravi, Raunchydog, and others who specialize in this form of discussion) have the right to say whatever you want about us, because that is guaranteed by Rick's anything goes guidelines for Fairfield Life. What you seem to be forgetting is *our* right to blow you off like the aggressive, bitchy argument addicts you are, and to ignore your silly asses. If you find this failure to pay attention to you and your obsessions offensive, or even an insult...GOOD. If that is the case, you may actually be (belatedly) getting the point. The whole *concept* of people waiting impatiently in front of their computers (as we all know Judy is), waiting for the new posting week to start so that they can rip into another of their enemies is FUCKIN' EMBARRASSING. Judy doesn't get this, and never will. Seemingly, neither does Ann. She keeps running the same tired old numbers over and over, in a seemingly never-ending quest to lure people into same boring, unproductive arguments that Robin specialized in trying to provoke and that Judy has built a nearly twenty-year career in provoking. Can you say Low standards in role models? I think you can. Grow the fuck up. Just because you don't like us, or because you insult us as often and in as many ways as you can think of doesn't mean we owe you a response. Curtis has IMO gone out of his way to try to have rational discussions with several people who cannot conceivably be described as rational themselves. That's just the compassionate way that he rolls, and I commend him for having the patience to do so. Me, I'm just not drawn that way. I think the chronic abusers should either grow the fuck up or shut the fuck up. I'm not going to encourage them by responding to their taunts. Xeno wrote: So, what was this post about? Was it directed to anyone? I think I'll go for a walk. Happy Birthday Barry.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility Just fucking speak for yourself Steve baby because this we of yours is a fantasy of yours whereas there's a real we out there that thinks you are RLY STOOOPID - seriously. I think it's Judy Durga's compassion that she makes up these cute humorous variations of really stupid so you idiots will not be offended, I always fucking reach for idiots's jugular. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:32 PM, seventhray27 steve.sun...@yahoo.comwrote: Ah, Judy, you're a lover. But let me congratulate you. You really stretched yourself. You waited all this time to lash out at me. That was not easy, I'm sure. BTW, I didn't care about LG's error of attribution. I didn't care about this context, that you are so sanctimonius about. You define context as it suits you. That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility. I was just making a point that depending on how you feel about a person you play your RLY STOOOPID card. It is one of your hallmarks. But, attempting to be positive, none of this detracts from the fact that you've shown some restraint in launching your weekly tirades. So, that's good.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
Ah Ravi, You are right on cue. I did have a revelation, Ravi, I am thinking you may feel a little out of place here. You know, the fact that most of us have some common past or present experience with TM and MMY. Would you like it if we set aside some time to talk about Amma issues. We can talk about the guy who died while being in police custody after allegedly approaching Amma in a threatening manner. Or we can talk about possible misappropiations of money by Amma with regards to her family. You can decide the subject matter. In fact, you might even want to give us the questions you would like us to ask you. And we can respond, Wow Ravi, that is so insightful, or Ravi, can you elaborate on that? And then after a time, we can go back to our normal discussions. What do you think? We could call it the Ravi Hour, or something. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility Just fucking speak for yourself Steve baby because this we of yours is a fantasy of yours whereas there's a real we out there that thinks you are RLY STOOOPID - seriously. I think it's Judy Durga's compassion that she makes up these cute humorous variations of really stupid so you idiots will not be offended, I always fucking reach for idiots's jugular. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:32 PM, seventhray27 wrote: Ah, Judy, you're a lover. But let me congratulate you. You really stretched yourself. You waited all this time to lash out at me. That was not easy, I'm sure. BTW, I didn't care about LG's error of attribution. I didn't care about this context, that you are so sanctimonius about. You define context as it suits you. That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility. I was just making a point that depending on how you feel about a person you play your RLY STOOOPID card. It is one of your hallmarks. But, attempting to be positive, none of this detracts from the fact that you've shown some restraint in launching your weekly tirades. So, that's good.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
Oh, and Ravi, I have a confession to make. I do believe you use the word retard, in an ok way. I know that others feel the word should not be used, but I am not offended by it. So, I don't want to crimp your style. If you feel you need to use it in your responses to me, go right ahead. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wVagQ_LVd4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wVagQ_LVd4 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Ah Ravi, You are right on cue. I did have a revelation, Ravi, I am thinking you may feel a little out of place here. You know, the fact that most of us have some common past or present experience with TM and MMY. Would you like it if we set aside some time to talk about Amma issues. We can talk about the guy who died while being in police custody after allegedly approaching Amma in a threatening manner. Or we can talk about possible misappropiations of money by Amma with regards to her family. You can decide the subject matter. In fact, you might even want to give us the questions you would like us to ask you. And we can respond, Wow Ravi, that is so insightful, or Ravi, can you elaborate on that? And then after a time, we can go back to our normal discussions. What do you think? We could call it the Ravi Hour, or something. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility Just fucking speak for yourself Steve baby because this we of yours is a fantasy of yours whereas there's a real we out there that thinks you are RLY STOOOPID - seriously. I think it's Judy Durga's compassion that she makes up these cute humorous variations of really stupid so you idiots will not be offended, I always fucking reach for idiots's jugular. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:32 PM, seventhray27 wrote: Ah, Judy, you're a lover. But let me congratulate you. You really stretched yourself. You waited all this time to lash out at me. That was not easy, I'm sure. BTW, I didn't care about LG's error of attribution. I didn't care about this context, that you are so sanctimonius about. You define context as it suits you. That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility. I was just making a point that depending on how you feel about a person you play your RLY STOOOPID card. It is one of your hallmarks. But, attempting to be positive, none of this detracts from the fact that you've shown some restraint in launching your weekly tirades. So, that's good.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: OMG...LOL..you are such an idiot Steve, hilarious post and you really cracked me up. I don't know who can help you here Steve baby - I don't know if any reasonable person can read my posts on FFL, watch my behavior and think I'm out of the place and care for any admiration or appreciation from others. My behavior here since May 2010 has always suggested the very opposite of what you fantasize here. You sound very disassociated here, I can understand the stress I cause you but you need to come up with something intelligent, some thing real. I seriously doubt it, you are too stunted and it's just futile. No biggie Ravi. Just thought it might give you a different avenue in which to express yourself. But same old, same old is fine by me. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:15 PM, seventhray27 wrote: ** Ah Ravi, You are right on cue. I did have a revelation, Ravi, I am thinking you may feel a little out of place here. You know, the fact that most of us have some common past or present experience with TM and MMY. Would you like it if we set aside some time to talk about Amma issues. We can talk about the guy who died while being in police custody after allegedly approaching Amma in a threatening manner. Or we can talk about possible misappropiations of money by Amma with regards to her family. You can decide the subject matter. In fact, you might even want to give us the questions you would like us to ask you. And we can respond, Wow Ravi, that is so insightful, or Ravi, can you elaborate on that? And then after a time, we can go back to our normal discussions. What do you think? We could call it the Ravi Hour, or something. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility Just fucking speak for yourself Steve baby because this we of yours is a fantasy of yours whereas there's a real we out there that thinks you are RLY STOOOPID - seriously. I think it's Judy Durga's compassion that she makes up these cute humorous variations of really stupid so you idiots will not be offended, I always fucking reach for idiots's jugular. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:32 PM, seventhray27 wrote: Ah, Judy, you're a lover. But let me congratulate you. You really stretched yourself. You waited all this time to lash out at me. That was not easy, I'm sure. BTW, I didn't care about LG's error of attribution. I didn't care about this context, that you are so sanctimonius about. You define context as it suits you. That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility. I was just making a point that depending on how you feel about a person you play your RLY STOOOPID card. It is one of your hallmarks. But, attempting to be positive, none of this detracts from the fact that you've shown some restraint in launching your weekly tirades. So, that's good.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
Whatever Steve - your retorts are always so lame, pathetic, idiotic and you only have one context - your idiotic context. Whereas I am burdened with a complex set of emotions even for a stranger like Steve, someone who posts on FFL. Your posts make me wince, I feel so sorry for you lot of times. But then the mayhem you cause with you stupidity again compels me to post with anger. You seem so hopeless, useless - sometimes I deeply contemplate on the value people like you bring to this Universe - I feel sad, feel lot of pain but I can feel the futility of this pain, and the futility of my posts and futility of my anger and all emotions at your idiotic posts. But then I'm alive, intelligent, open, vulnerable. And then I see someone like you - it seems such a blessing to be an idiot - no burden, no guilt, no accountability for your actions. No sense of any contemplation, reflection, debate. God bless the idiots !!! On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:32 PM, seventhray27 steve.sun...@yahoo.comwrote: ** Oh, and Ravi, I have a confession to make. I do believe you use the word retard, in an ok way. I know that others feel the word should not be used, but I am not offended by it. So, I don't want to crimp your style. If you feel you need to use it in your responses to me, go right ahead. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wVagQ_LVd4 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Ah Ravi, You are right on cue. I did have a revelation, Ravi, I am thinking you may feel a little out of place here. You know, the fact that most of us have some common past or present experience with TM and MMY. Would you like it if we set aside some time to talk about Amma issues. We can talk about the guy who died while being in police custody after allegedly approaching Amma in a threatening manner. Or we can talk about possible misappropiations of money by Amma with regards to her family. You can decide the subject matter. In fact, you might even want to give us the questions you would like us to ask you. And we can respond, Wow Ravi, that is so insightful, or Ravi, can you elaborate on that? And then after a time, we can go back to our normal discussions. What do you think? We could call it the Ravi Hour, or something. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility Just fucking speak for yourself Steve baby because this we of yours is a fantasy of yours whereas there's a real we out there that thinks you are RLY STOOOPID - seriously. I think it's Judy Durga's compassion that she makes up these cute humorous variations of really stupid so you idiots will not be offended, I always fucking reach for idiots's jugular. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:32 PM, seventhray27 wrote: Ah, Judy, you're a lover. But let me congratulate you. You really stretched yourself. You waited all this time to lash out at me. That was not easy, I'm sure. BTW, I didn't care about LG's error of attribution. I didn't care about this context, that you are so sanctimonius about. You define context as it suits you. That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility. I was just making a point that depending on how you feel about a person you play your RLY STOOOPID card. It is one of your hallmarks. But, attempting to be positive, none of this detracts from the fact that you've shown some restraint in launching your weekly tirades. So, that's good.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.comwrote: Whatever Steve - your retorts are always so lame, pathetic, idiotic and you only have one context - your idiotic context. Whereas I am burdened with a complex set of emotions even for a stranger like Steve, someone who posts on FFL. Your posts make me wince, I feel so sorry for you lot of times. But then the mayhem you cause with you stupidity again compels me to post with anger. You seem so hopeless, useless - sometimes I deeply contemplate on the value people like you bring to this Universe - I feel sad, feel lot of pain but I can feel the futility of this pain, and the futility of my posts and futility of my anger and all emotions at your idiotic posts. But then I'm alive, intelligent, open, vulnerable. I lost my train of thought here. I meant - Yet I'm alive, intelligent, open, vulnerable and I'm not frozen into inaction like some West coast liberal Buddhist wimps who wrap compassion, peace, non-violence into a belief system a la Xeno. Not that this will make any sense to you Steve. You are the most unintelligent poster on FFL - it's not I who feel out of place here - you are simply projecting - you do, you feel out of place here, among the intelligent posters. You need appreciation, admiration. Every place is Ravi place and every hour is Ravi hour, I'm totally at ease at a night club or a temple because I'm not a victim of any belief system or any fear, insecurity, anxiety. I have intentionally explored all places after 2009 to test the limits of my freedom and continue to do so. And then I see someone like you - it seems such a blessing to be an idiot - no burden, no guilt, no accountability for your actions. No sense of any contemplation, reflection, debate. God bless the idiots !!! On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:32 PM, seventhray27 steve.sun...@yahoo.comwrote: ** Oh, and Ravi, I have a confession to make. I do believe you use the word retard, in an ok way. I know that others feel the word should not be used, but I am not offended by it. So, I don't want to crimp your style. If you feel you need to use it in your responses to me, go right ahead. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wVagQ_LVd4 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Ah Ravi, You are right on cue. I did have a revelation, Ravi, I am thinking you may feel a little out of place here. You know, the fact that most of us have some common past or present experience with TM and MMY. Would you like it if we set aside some time to talk about Amma issues. We can talk about the guy who died while being in police custody after allegedly approaching Amma in a threatening manner. Or we can talk about possible misappropiations of money by Amma with regards to her family. You can decide the subject matter. In fact, you might even want to give us the questions you would like us to ask you. And we can respond, Wow Ravi, that is so insightful, or Ravi, can you elaborate on that? And then after a time, we can go back to our normal discussions. What do you think? We could call it the Ravi Hour, or something. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility Just fucking speak for yourself Steve baby because this we of yours is a fantasy of yours whereas there's a real we out there that thinks you are RLY STOOOPID - seriously. I think it's Judy Durga's compassion that she makes up these cute humorous variations of really stupid so you idiots will not be offended, I always fucking reach for idiots's jugular. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:32 PM, seventhray27 wrote: Ah, Judy, you're a lover. But let me congratulate you. You really stretched yourself. You waited all this time to lash out at me. That was not easy, I'm sure. BTW, I didn't care about LG's error of attribution. I didn't care about this context, that you are so sanctimonius about. You define context as it suits you. That may be one reason why, to many here, you have so little credibility. I was just making a point that depending on how you feel about a person you play your RLY STOOOPID card. It is one of your hallmarks. But, attempting to be positive, none of this detracts from the fact that you've shown some restraint in launching your weekly tirades. So, that's good.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: Gee, you're stupid, laughinggull. I wouldn't say it sinks to the level of stupidity, however I *did* reread and found the one clarifying sentence that I missed earlier: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329456... dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. I am honored that I was at least a part of your 50th post, and indeed would rather just quiety forget [I] ever said anything. Sorry *really* stupid feste, but you're on your own buddy. Showdown at 7:00 as I'm sure we'll all be watching with bated breath. Feste too. But you're *really* stupid. This is my 50th post for the week, so you have until 7:00 p.m. tomorrow to decide whether you want me to document your stupidity publicly, or you'd rather just quietly forget you ever said anything. You might want to do a little reviewing all by yourself before you make that decision. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use which did not include the word negative. That's right, Ann, the words she used were (wait for it!) less than completely positive. (Here, let me wipe the coffee off your monitor for you while you blow your nose.) From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329231... Tell ya what, let's make life easier for her. Let's protect her by not paying any attention to her and not interacting with her in any way. Then she'll have no reason to feel threatened, poor dear. She can just do her little act all by herself without worrying that any reality is going to be brought to her attention. ...suggested by the person who indirectly paid attention to her and indirectly interacted with her in some way above. (Well, that didn't last very long.) BTW, Curtis was at the time also having a far from positive discussion with dumbass...could Share not have been referring to how Curtis was expressing himself to dumbass? Could Ann have just given herself away by thinking Share was referring to her? Or are both Judy and Ann in a state of restful alertness, but no thoughts are in it, it simply reflects the truth of any situation...[where] there is no longer any need for speculation, or conjecture, or even much thought? Maybe dumbass is on to something here...  I found the dialogue between you and Curtis very interesting but not what I would call easy to understand. From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on my part? àAnd I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist.àNot easy in this day and age.àI think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected.àBy now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to.àOTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-:àBTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day.àI hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack ofàpro TM words on FFL. àFrom: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion à-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies carefully because I know I can learn something from you.ÃâàHow you express yourself when people are less than completely positive towards you.ÃâàI'm probably not saying this right but I wanted to make the attempt anyway (-: According to youtube this is supposed to be Curtis as he sings during a Christmas party. (I hope it's the correct Curtis). Besides being president
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use which did not include the word negative. That's right, Ann, the words she used were (wait for it!) less than completely positive. (Here, let me wipe the coffee off your monitor for you while you blow your nose.) From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329231... Tell ya what, let's make life easier for her. Let's protect her by not paying any attention to her and not interacting with her in any way. Then she'll have no reason to feel threatened, poor dear. She can just do her little act all by herself without worrying that any reality is going to be brought to her attention. ...suggested by the person who indirectly paid attention to her and indirectly interacted with her in some way above. (Well, that didn't last very long.) BTW, Curtis was at the time also having a far from positive discussion with dumbass...could Share not have been referring to how Curtis was expressing himself to dumbass? I don't think so as she replied to Nabby : dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Post 329456 Could Ann have just given herself away by thinking Share was referring to her? And given myself away how, oh Laughing One? That I thought I was being negative? No, I do not think it nor was it my intention. Curtis and I were having an adult and civilized conversation and hence I was surprised that Share thought it was negative from my side. I can certainly be negative but I don't think even Curtis would agree that I was this time. He appeared to be cool with it all but you never can tell around here sometimes. Or are both Judy and Ann in a state of restful alertness, but no thoughts are in it, it simply reflects the truth of any situation...[where] there is no longer any need for speculation, or conjecture, or even much thought? I think if anyone is guilty of lack of thought, or shall we just say simple powers of observation, it is the gull this time around. Maybe dumbass is on to something here... You are correct Ann as I recognized in: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329493, that believe it or not, I actually posted before reading your post above. (Judy's was first in the queue and I responded to her after re-reading the exchange where I found the clarifying sentence.) Jeez woman, you are quick, but I would rather you had waited for me to rise to Judy's challenge before giving it away...I was so proud of myself and am glad that I didn't read your give-away first. Anyway, my apologies for the mistake although I thought other parts were somewhat humorous, n'est-ce pas?  I found the dialogue between you and Curtis very interesting but not what I would call easy to understand. From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on my part? àAnd I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist.àNot easy in this day and age.àI think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected.àBy now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to.àOTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-:àBTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day.àI hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack ofàpro TM words on FFL. àFrom: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion à-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies carefully
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@... wrote: Isn't it fun to be both judge and jury Steve? In a world of make believe you can be anyone you want to be. You can create the story as you see fit, you can live out all your fantasies and work through your scenarios of revenge. How great is that? (Plus how can anyone own up to anything when they can't post?) Ann, Is it possible that you meant to address this post to Judy. I mean I think it makes a lot more sense if you did. And Ann, bless your heart. Asking Judy to own up to something? If you advertised that, you could charge for admission and probably garner some enormous receipts.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use which did not include the word negative. That's right, Ann, the words she used were (wait for it!) less than completely positive. (Here, let me wipe the coffee off your monitor for you while you blow your nose.) From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329231... Tell ya what, let's make life easier for her. Let's protect her by not paying any attention to her and not interacting with her in any way. Then she'll have no reason to feel threatened, poor dear. She can just do her little act all by herself without worrying that any reality is going to be brought to her attention. ...suggested by the person who indirectly paid attention to her and indirectly interacted with her in some way above. (Well, that didn't last very long.) BTW, Curtis was at the time also having a far from positive discussion with dumbass...could Share not have been referring to how Curtis was expressing himself to dumbass? I don't think so as she replied to Nabby : dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Post 329456 Could Ann have just given herself away by thinking Share was referring to her? And given myself away how, oh Laughing One? That I thought I was being negative? No, I do not think it nor was it my intention. Curtis and I were having an adult and civilized conversation and hence I was surprised that Share thought it was negative from my side. I can certainly be negative but I don't think even Curtis would agree that I was this time. He appeared to be cool with it all but you never can tell around here sometimes. Or are both Judy and Ann in a state of restful alertness, but no thoughts are in it, it simply reflects the truth of any situation...[where] there is no longer any need for speculation, or conjecture, or even much thought? I think if anyone is guilty of lack of thought, or shall we just say simple powers of observation, it is the gull this time around. Maybe dumbass is on to something here... You are correct Ann as I recognized in: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329493, that believe it or not, I actually posted before reading your post above. (Judy's was first in the queue and I responded to her after re-reading the exchange where I found the clarifying sentence.) Jeez woman, you are quick, but I would rather you had waited for me to rise to Judy's challenge before giving it away...I was so proud of myself and am glad that I didn't read your give-away first. Anyway, my apologies for the mistake although I thought other parts were somewhat humorous, n'est-ce pas? Hey, no biggie. I have made plenty of oversights and mistakes but I was a bit disconcerted to think people (yourself and Share) were 'on me' for having this discussion with Curtis which I felt was honest and searching. There is plenty of crazy negativity and projecting here at our alma mater we call FFL but there doesn't have to be even MORE created where there is none. But like I said, I am sure to be the one to make the next blooper so I better not say I told you so!  I found the dialogue between you and Curtis very interesting but not what I would call easy to understand. From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on my part? àAnd I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist.àNot easy in this day and age.àI think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected.àBy now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to.àOTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
I am not interested in the intricacies of your ludicrous obsessions. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: Gee, you're stupid, laughinggull. Feste too. But you're *really* stupid. This is my 50th post for the week, so you have until 7:00 p.m. tomorrow to decide whether you want me to document your stupidity publicly, or you'd rather just quietly forget you ever said anything. You might want to do a little reviewing all by yourself before you make that decision. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use which did not include the word negative. That's right, Ann, the words she used were (wait for it!) less than completely positive. (Here, let me wipe the coffee off your monitor for you while you blow your nose.) From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329231... Tell ya what, let's make life easier for her. Let's protect her by not paying any attention to her and not interacting with her in any way. Then she'll have no reason to feel threatened, poor dear. She can just do her little act all by herself without worrying that any reality is going to be brought to her attention. ...suggested by the person who indirectly paid attention to her and indirectly interacted with her in some way above. (Well, that didn't last very long.) BTW, Curtis was at the time also having a far from positive discussion with dumbass...could Share not have been referring to how Curtis was expressing himself to dumbass? Could Ann have just given herself away by thinking Share was referring to her? Or are both Judy and Ann in a state of restful alertness, but no thoughts are in it, it simply reflects the truth of any situation...[where] there is no longer any need for speculation, or conjecture, or even much thought? Maybe dumbass is on to something here...  I found the dialogue between you and Curtis very interesting but not what I would call easy to understand. From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on my part? àAnd I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist.àNot easy in this day and age.àI think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected.àBy now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to.àOTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-:àBTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day.àI hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack ofàpro TM words on FFL. àFrom: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion à-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies carefully because I know I can learn something from you.ÃâàHow you express yourself when people are less than completely positive towards you.ÃâàI'm probably not saying this right but I wanted to make the attempt anyway (-: According to youtube this is supposed to be Curtis as he sings during a Christmas party. (I hope it's the correct Curtis). Besides being president in the hate club gotta-blame-Maharishi-for-my-miserable-life this is what curtis does to scrape by: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5mc2T8g68M
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@... wrote: Hey, no biggie. I have made plenty of oversights and mistakes but I was a bit disconcerted to think people (yourself and Share) were 'on me' for having this discussion with Curtis which I felt was honest and searching. There is plenty of crazy negativity and projecting here at our alma mater we call FFL but there doesn't have to be even MORE created where there is none. But like I said, I am sure to be the one to make the next blooper so I better not say I told you so! Hey, I guess this is what you call a gracious and classy reply, instead of what we might have expected from Judy along the lines how how RALY, REALY STOOOPID someone is for making an innocent mistake. But that would be the Judester for ya. (46)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@ wrote: Hey, no biggie. I have made plenty of oversights and mistakes but I was a bit disconcerted to think people (yourself and Share) were 'on me' for having this discussion with Curtis which I felt was honest and searching. There is plenty of crazy negativity and projecting here at our alma mater we call FFL but there doesn't have to be even MORE created where there is none. But like I said, I am sure to be the one to make the next blooper so I better not say I told you so! Hey, I guess this is what you call a gracious and classy reply, instead of what we might have expected from Judy along the lines how how RALY, REALY STOOOPID someone is for making an innocent mistake. But that would be the Judester for ya. What I find fascinating is that Ann SO misses the point. That is, that what *she* calls an honest and searching discussion is very much in the model of Robin's confrontations, and what Curtis and others have termed boundary violations. The essence of them is, I'm going to say things about you that are negative and demeaning, and it's OK because I really believe them to be true. Now *your* job is to respond defensively to them and have an argument with me, so that I can demonstrate my superiority to you. She doesn't even GET that she's being consistently bitchy, mean, and pretending to be oh-so-superior to the people she tries to lure into arguments with her. This is the act that many of us are so tired of here. WE DON'T OWE YOU SHIT, much less an argument, just because you want to have one. We certainly don't owe you one when you hide your argument-provoking behind a mask of having an honest and searching discussion. You (meaning Ann, Robin, Jimbo, Ravi, Raunchydog, and others who specialize in this form of discussion) have the right to say whatever you want about us, because that is guaranteed by Rick's anything goes guidelines for Fairfield Life. What you seem to be forgetting is *our* right to blow you off like the aggressive, bitchy argument addicts you are, and to ignore your silly asses. If you find this failure to pay attention to you and your obsessions offensive, or even an insult...GOOD. If that is the case, you may actually be (belatedly) getting the point. The whole *concept* of people waiting impatiently in front of their computers (as we all know Judy is), waiting for the new posting week to start so that they can rip into another of their enemies is FUCKIN' EMBARRASSING. Judy doesn't get this, and never will. Seemingly, neither does Ann. She keeps running the same tired old numbers over and over, in a seemingly never-ending quest to lure people into same boring, unproductive arguments that Robin specialized in trying to provoke and that Judy has built a nearly twenty-year career in provoking. Can you say Low standards in role models? I think you can. Grow the fuck up. Just because you don't like us, or because you insult us as often and in as many ways as you can think of doesn't mean we owe you a response. Curtis has IMO gone out of his way to try to have rational discussions with several people who cannot conceivably be described as rational themselves. That's just the compassionate way that he rolls, and I commend him for having the patience to do so. Me, I'm just not drawn that way. I think the chronic abusers should either grow the fuck up or shut the fuck up. I'm not going to encourage them by responding to their taunts.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@ wrote: Hey, no biggie. I have made plenty of oversights and mistakes but I was a bit disconcerted to think people (yourself and Share) were 'on me' for having this discussion with Curtis which I felt was honest and searching. There is plenty of crazy negativity and projecting here at our alma mater we call FFL but there doesn't have to be even MORE created where there is none. But like I said, I am sure to be the one to make the next blooper so I better not say I told you so! Hey, I guess this is what you call a gracious and classy reply, instead of what we might have expected from Judy along the lines how how RALY, REALY STOOOPID someone is for making an innocent mistake. But that would be the Judester for ya. What I find fascinating is that Ann SO misses the point. That is, that what *she* calls an honest and searching discussion is very much in the model of Robin's confrontations, and what Curtis and others have termed boundary violations. The essence of them is, I'm going to say things about you that are negative and demeaning, and it's OK because I really believe them to be true. Now *your* job is to respond defensively to them and have an argument with me, so that I can demonstrate my superiority to you. She doesn't even GET that she's being consistently bitchy, mean, and pretending to be oh-so-superior to the people she tries to lure into arguments with her. This is the act that many of us are so tired of here. WE DON'T OWE YOU SHIT, much less an argument, just because you want to have one. We certainly don't owe you one when you hide your argument-provoking behind a mask of having an honest and searching discussion. You (meaning Ann, Robin, Jimbo, Ravi, Raunchydog, and others who specialize in this form of discussion) have the right to say whatever you want about us, because that is guaranteed by Rick's anything goes guidelines for Fairfield Life. What you seem to be forgetting is *our* right to blow you off like the aggressive, bitchy argument addicts you are, and to ignore your silly asses. If you find this failure to pay attention to you and your obsessions offensive, or even an insult...GOOD. If that is the case, you may actually be (belatedly) getting the point. The whole *concept* of people waiting impatiently in front of their computers (as we all know Judy is), waiting for the new posting week to start so that they can rip into another of their enemies is FUCKIN' EMBARRASSING. Judy doesn't get this, and never will. Seemingly, neither does Ann. She keeps running the same tired old numbers over and over, in a seemingly never-ending quest to lure people into same boring, unproductive arguments that Robin specialized in trying to provoke and that Judy has built a nearly twenty-year career in provoking. Can you say Low standards in role models? I think you can. Grow the fuck up. Just because you don't like us, or because you insult us as often and in as many ways as you can think of doesn't mean we owe you a response. Curtis has IMO gone out of his way to try to have rational discussions with several people who cannot conceivably be described as rational themselves. That's just the compassionate way that he rolls, and I commend him for having the patience to do so. Me, I'm just not drawn that way. I think the chronic abusers should either grow the fuck up or shut the fuck up. I'm not going to encourage them by responding to their taunts. [184]* * * * * * [206] http://images.search.yahoo.com/images/view;_ylt=A2KJkIVy1stQyxkA1b.Jzbk\ F;_ylu=X3oDMTBlMTQ4cGxyBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDaW1n?back=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.sea\ rch.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages%3F_adv_prop%3Dimage%26va%3Dimage%2Bblush\ ing%2Bgirl%26fr%3Dmoz35%26tab%3Dorganic%26ri%3D2w=385h=480imgurl=olpe\ ra.shikshik.org%2F_cacheimg%2Fl%2Fi%2Flittle%2520girl%2520blushing.jpgr\ url=http%3A%2F%2Folpera.shikshik.org%2F2011%2F07%2F10%2Flittle-girl-blus\ hing%2Fsize=15.4+KBname=Little+%3Cb%3Egirl+blushing+%3C%2Fb%3E%7C+Olpe\ rap=image+blushing+girloid=88f564d0e18e6121c329e8da7daa8904fr2=fr=mo\ z35tt=Little%2B%253Cb%253Egirl%2Bblushing%2B%253C%252Fb%253E%257C%2BOlp\ erab=0ni=90no=2ts=tab=organicsigr=11r41n3rbsigb=13deg4ltmsigi=11\ uiek821.crumb=S.s05XcdW67 *
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. And I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist. Not easy in this day and age. I think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected. By now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to. OTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-: BTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day. I hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack of pro TM words on FFL. From: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies carefully because I know I can learn something from you. How you express yourself when people are less than completely positive towards you. I'm probably not saying this right but I wanted to make the attempt anyway (-: According to youtube this is supposed to be Curtis as he sings during a Christmas party. (I hope it's the correct Curtis). Besides being president in the hate club gotta-blame-Maharishi-for-my-miserable-life this is what curtis does to scrape by: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5mc2T8g68M
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. And I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist. Artist ? You certainly are showing a new and humours side :-)  Not easy in this day and age. I think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected. By now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to. Same for me. Reading the venom from Curtis et. al. over the years towards the only Master they ever met (and is likely to meet in a very long time) has made it clear that deeprooted problems, as well as Divinity, is within. OTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-: :-) BTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day. I hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack of pro TM words on FFL.  Maharishi once compared a large group of meditators with the hand; some fingers are short, some are long, some thick some thin, but together they make a GRIP. Whoever goes to the Domes is doing a wonderful job for their own karma thus for their future, and the world. Keep up the good work !
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on my part?  And I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist. Not easy in this day and age. I think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected. By now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to. OTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-: BTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day. I hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack of pro TM words on FFL.  From: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion  -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies carefully because I know I can learn something from you.àHow you express yourself when people are less than completely positive towards you.àI'm probably not saying this right but I wanted to make the attempt anyway (-: According to youtube this is supposed to be Curtis as he sings during a Christmas party. (I hope it's the correct Curtis). Besides being president in the hate club gotta-blame-Maharishi-for-my-miserable-life this is what curtis does to scrape by: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5mc2T8g68M
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use which did not include the word negative. I found the dialogue between you and Curtis very interesting but not what I would call easy to understand. From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on my part?  And I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist. Not easy in this day and age. I think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected. By now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to. OTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-: BTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day. I hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack of pro TM words on FFL.  From: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion  -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies carefully because I know I can learn something from you. How you express yourself when people are less than completely positive towards you. I'm probably not saying this right but I wanted to make the attempt anyway (-: According to youtube this is supposed to be Curtis as he sings during a Christmas party. (I hope it's the correct Curtis). Besides being president in the hate club gotta-blame-Maharishi-for-my-miserable-life this is what curtis does to scrape by: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5mc2T8g68M
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use which did not include the word negative. I found the dialogue between you and Curtis very interesting but not what I would call easy to understand. Well, I was hoping you wouldn't have found my interactions in any way attacking Curtis because my intention was not to do that but to open a line of communication about his initial Christmas post which I found, in some ways, disturbing. I've discovered that Curtis is often open to talking about himself and what he does and feels and bounces things back and forth on the court in a way which is worth addressing. So, it can make for some productive conversations. I would have been a bit dismayed if you had found the dialogues offensive from my end because in no way was I attempting to attack Curtis in any way. He can take as good as he can give anyway. Funny that you found our posts hard to understand. There needed to be some clarifications on a couple of points but other than that I thought they were pretty straight forward. Thanks for your response though I am unsure what you meant by (especially) the second sentence. You don't have to tell me if you don't want to but I would be interested in you expanding on these ideas or perceptions, or in fact, anything you want to talk about at all. I'm not really a Wolf Baitor or Baiter or even a Big Bad Wolf. From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on my part? àAnd I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist.àNot easy in this day and age.àI think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected.àBy now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to.àOTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-:àBTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day.àI hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack ofàpro TM words on FFL. àFrom: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion à-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies carefully because I know I can learn something from you.ÃâàHow you express yourself when people are less than completely positive towards you.ÃâàI'm probably not saying this right but I wanted to make the attempt anyway (-: According to youtube this is supposed to be Curtis as he sings during a Christmas party. (I hope it's the correct Curtis). Besides being president in the hate club gotta-blame-Maharishi-for-my-miserable-life this is what curtis does to scrape by: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5mc2T8g68M
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use which did not include the word negative. That's right, Ann, the words she used were (wait for it!) less than completely positive. (Here, let me wipe the coffee off your monitor for you while you blow your nose.)  I found the dialogue between you and Curtis very interesting but not what I would call easy to understand. From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on my part? àAnd I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist.àNot easy in this day and age.àI think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected.àBy now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to.àOTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-:àBTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day.àI hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack ofàpro TM words on FFL. àFrom: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion à-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies carefully because I know I can learn something from you.ÃâàHow you express yourself when people are less than completely positive towards you.ÃâàI'm probably not saying this right but I wanted to make the attempt anyway (-: According to youtube this is supposed to be Curtis as he sings during a Christmas party. (I hope it's the correct Curtis). Besides being president in the hate club gotta-blame-Maharishi-for-my-miserable-life this is what curtis does to scrape by: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5mc2T8g68M
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use which did not include the word negative. That's right, Ann, the words she used were (wait for it!) less than completely positive. (Here, let me wipe the coffee off your monitor for you while you blow your nose.) From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329231... Tell ya what, let's make life easier for her. Let's protect her by not paying any attention to her and not interacting with her in any way. Then she'll have no reason to feel threatened, poor dear. She can just do her little act all by herself without worrying that any reality is going to be brought to her attention. ...suggested by the person who indirectly paid attention to her and indirectly interacted with her in some way above. (Well, that didn't last very long.) BTW, Curtis was at the time also having a far from positive discussion with dumbass...could Share not have been referring to how Curtis was expressing himself to dumbass? Could Ann have just given herself away by thinking Share was referring to her? Or are both Judy and Ann in a state of restful alertness, but no thoughts are in it, it simply reflects the truth of any situation...[where] there is no longer any need for speculation, or conjecture, or even much thought? Maybe dumbass is on to something here...  I found the dialogue between you and Curtis very interesting but not what I would call easy to understand. From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on my part? àAnd I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist.àNot easy in this day and age.àI think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected.àBy now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to.àOTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-:àBTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day.àI hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack ofàpro TM words on FFL. àFrom: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion à-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies carefully because I know I can learn something from you.ÃâàHow you express yourself when people are less than completely positive towards you.ÃâàI'm probably not saying this right but I wanted to make the attempt anyway (-: According to youtube this is supposed to be Curtis as he sings during a Christmas party. (I hope it's the correct Curtis). Besides being president in the hate club gotta-blame-Maharishi-for-my-miserable-life this is what curtis does to scrape by: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5mc2T8g68M
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use which did not include the word negative. That's right, Ann, the words she used were (wait for it!) less than completely positive. (Here, let me wipe the coffee off your monitor for you while you blow your nose.) From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329231... Tell ya what, let's make life easier for her. Let's protect her by not paying any attention to her and not interacting with her in any way. Then she'll have no reason to feel threatened, poor dear. She can just do her little act all by herself without worrying that any reality is going to be brought to her attention. ...suggested by the person who indirectly paid attention to her and indirectly interacted with her in some way above. (Well, that didn't last very long.) Yeah, not content with making the most spiteful post of the week, authfriend then makes a complete fool of herself by not even following her own suggestion. A good example of how irrational hatred warps the mind.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
Gee, you're stupid, laughinggull. Feste too. But you're *really* stupid. This is my 50th post for the week, so you have until 7:00 p.m. tomorrow to decide whether you want me to document your stupidity publicly, or you'd rather just quietly forget you ever said anything. You might want to do a little reviewing all by yourself before you make that decision. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use which did not include the word negative. That's right, Ann, the words she used were (wait for it!) less than completely positive. (Here, let me wipe the coffee off your monitor for you while you blow your nose.) From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329231... Tell ya what, let's make life easier for her. Let's protect her by not paying any attention to her and not interacting with her in any way. Then she'll have no reason to feel threatened, poor dear. She can just do her little act all by herself without worrying that any reality is going to be brought to her attention. ...suggested by the person who indirectly paid attention to her and indirectly interacted with her in some way above. (Well, that didn't last very long.) BTW, Curtis was at the time also having a far from positive discussion with dumbass...could Share not have been referring to how Curtis was expressing himself to dumbass? Could Ann have just given herself away by thinking Share was referring to her? Or are both Judy and Ann in a state of restful alertness, but no thoughts are in it, it simply reflects the truth of any situation...[where] there is no longer any need for speculation, or conjecture, or even much thought? Maybe dumbass is on to something here...  I found the dialogue between you and Curtis very interesting but not what I would call easy to understand. From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on my part? àAnd I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist.àNot easy in this day and age.àI think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected.àBy now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to.àOTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-:àBTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day.àI hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack ofàpro TM words on FFL. àFrom: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion à-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies carefully because I know I can learn something from you.ÃâàHow you express yourself when people are less than completely positive towards you.ÃâàI'm probably not saying this right but I wanted to make the attempt anyway (-: According to youtube this is supposed to be Curtis as he sings during a Christmas party. (I hope it's the correct Curtis). Besides being president in the hate club gotta-blame-Maharishi-for-my-miserable-life this is what curtis does to scrape by: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5mc2T8g68M
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: Gee, you're stupid, laughinggull. Feste too. But you're *really* stupid. This is my 50th post for the week, so you have until 7:00 p.m. tomorrow to decide whether you want me to document your stupidity publicly, or you'd rather just quietly forget you ever said anything. You might want to do a little reviewing all by yourself before you make that decision. Judy, if you don't mind, I for one would like it if you could document this. And also, I suspect there are quite a few other inaccuracies in the past few days which will need to be addressed. These should not be given a free pass. Someone needs to step up to the plate for this, and I think you would be best person. Let me know if I can help.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Well Ann as I said to Curtis in my original post, I probably wasn't saying it right. And I'm still no clearer about it than I was when I wrote the post to Curtis so am unable to clarify. Except to refer you back to the words I did use which did not include the word negative. That's right, Ann, the words she used were (wait for it!) less than completely positive. (Here, let me wipe the coffee off your monitor for you while you blow your nose.) From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/329231... Tell ya what, let's make life easier for her. Let's protect her by not paying any attention to her and not interacting with her in any way. Then she'll have no reason to feel threatened, poor dear. She can just do her little act all by herself without worrying that any reality is going to be brought to her attention. ...suggested by the person who indirectly paid attention to her and indirectly interacted with her in some way above. (Well, that didn't last very long.) BTW, Curtis was at the time also having a far from positive discussion with dumbass...could Share not have been referring to how Curtis was expressing himself to dumbass? I don't think so as she replied to Nabby : dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Post 329456 Could Ann have just given herself away by thinking Share was referring to her? And given myself away how, oh Laughing One? That I thought I was being negative? No, I do not think it nor was it my intention. Curtis and I were having an adult and civilized conversation and hence I was surprised that Share thought it was negative from my side. I can certainly be negative but I don't think even Curtis would agree that I was this time. He appeared to be cool with it all but you never can tell around here sometimes. Or are both Judy and Ann in a state of restful alertness, but no thoughts are in it, it simply reflects the truth of any situation...[where] there is no longer any need for speculation, or conjecture, or even much thought? I think if anyone is guilty of lack of thought, or shall we just say simple powers of observation, it is the gull this time around. Maybe dumbass is on to something here...  I found the dialogue between you and Curtis very interesting but not what I would call easy to understand. From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: dear Nablusoss, I was referring to his replies to Ann. Could you clarify what you mean here Share? Are you saying that my interactions in the last couple of days with Curtis were negative on my part? àAnd I admire it when a person earns his or her living as an artist.àNot easy in this day and age.àI think many of us on FFL are mainly bothered by the unexpected.àBy now I know who the anti TM people are so it doesn't bother me the way that it used to.àOTOH, I'm still recuperating from the comments you made about the lips of Sheryl Crow (-:àBTW, I'm still going to the Dome twice a day every day.àI hope that in your eyes my pro TM actions in FF make up for my lack ofàpro TM words on FFL. àFrom: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion à-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Curtis, just want to say that I'm reading your replies carefully because I know I can learn something from you.ÃâàHow you express yourself when people are less than completely positive towards you.ÃâàI'm probably not saying this right but I wanted to make the attempt anyway (-: According to youtube this is supposed to be Curtis as he sings during a Christmas party. (I hope it's the correct Curtis). Besides being president in the hate club gotta-blame-Maharishi-for-my-miserable-life this is what curtis does to scrape by: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5mc2T8g68M
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earnest Confusion to Nablusoss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: Gee, you're stupid, laughinggull. Feste too. But you're *really* stupid. This is my 50th post for the week, so you have until 7:00 p.m. tomorrow to decide whether you want me to document your stupidity publicly, or you'd rather just quietly forget you ever said anything. You might want to do a little reviewing all by yourself before you make that decision. Ladies and gentleman of the jury, have you reached a decision? You ARE quick. Yes we have your honor. We find the defendant, Judith Stein guilty of hypocrisy, nonsensical parsing, and being totally unable to own up to her obvious mistakes Isn't it fun to be both judge and jury Steve? In a world of make believe you can be anyone you want to be. You can create the story as you see fit, you can live out all your fantasies and work through your scenarios of revenge. How great is that? (Plus how can anyone own up to anything when they can't post?) And what do you recommend for punishment? Your honor, we recommend that the defendant's posting priviledges be suspended until sunset Friday, December 14th What's a 'privi-ledge'? Can one jump off of it and fly? Well, I must say it is a light sentence in light of her repeated offenses. Keep dreaming, what comes next? Yes your honor, she is repeat offender, but as you are aware, the sentencing guidelines are quite strict in this regard. Ah yes. Until such time the guidelines are amended, this is the maximum penalty allowed by law. Let's get Buck on this, he'll have some significant penalties to dish out. Thank you, your honor No, no thank YOU!
