[FairfieldLife] Re: Aquinas on God

2016-04-13 Thread emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
H."Am I sure?"  Pretty sure...but a good question to ask, yes? 

 Here's something funny.  The day before you posted the reply that includes the 
sentence below, I read the following sentence and said to myself, "I must look 
up this word "noumenal."  (Yes, I'd say I'm a beginner in a lot of ways today.) 

 

 "Looking deeply into the phenomenological world, we touch the true nature, the 
noumenal world."
 

 "And all phenomena are manifestations of the noumenon (a thing as it is in 
itself, as distinct from a thing as it is knowable by the senses through 
phenomenal attributes). So ultimately "the real thing" transcends phenomena. 
~s3raphita
 

 Things like that happen all the time here for me.  I'll ask a question 
silently and suddenly a topic will address it somehow.  I don't really believe 
it, so I just keep testing!  Ha.  
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Re "The Buddhist idea of Dependent Co-Arising, which is a philosophy that 
would allow for the concept of infinite regression to exist": 

 Intriguing suggestion. Never thought of that. You sure you're a novice?
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 These Crash Courses are good at instructing the ignorant masses.   

 At about 8:15 in, he states that Aquinas takes it as a given that everything 
must have a cause other than itself, and that therefore, his argument of God as 
"first cause" is self-defeating because why wouldn't "God" have to abide by the 
same "rules."  I thought that was one of the deals with theism - no "God" 
doesn't abide by the same "rules" as his creation.  
 

 I don't try to talk intelligently about any of this because I'm such a novice, 
but just read the Buddhist idea of Dependent Co-Arising, which is a philosophy 
that would allow for the concept of infinite regression to exist, in theory.  
 

 Seems to get down to the age-old discussion of dualistic vs non-dualistic 
view/approach.   
 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The Cosmological arguments of Aquinas.  Also discusses flaws and 
counterarguments.
 Aquinas basically examines causes and effects, saying that if one traces 
origins backwards, there can't be an infinite regress.  But on the contrary, 
that could be a  false presumption on his part.
 

 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course Philosophy #10 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course P... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY Our unit on the philosophy of 
religion and the existence of god continues with Thomas Aquinas. Today, we 
consider his first four arguments: the cosmological ...


 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 








 
  




[FairfieldLife] Re: Aquinas on God

2016-04-13 Thread s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Re "The Buddhist idea of Dependent Co-Arising, which is a philosophy that would 
allow for the concept of infinite regression to exist": 

 Intriguing suggestion. Never thought of that. You sure you're a novice?
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 These Crash Courses are good at instructing the ignorant masses.   

 At about 8:15 in, he states that Aquinas takes it as a given that everything 
must have a cause other than itself, and that therefore, his argument of God as 
"first cause" is self-defeating because why wouldn't "God" have to abide by the 
same "rules."  I thought that was one of the deals with theism - no "God" 
doesn't abide by the same "rules" as his creation.  
 

 I don't try to talk intelligently about any of this because I'm such a novice, 
but just read the Buddhist idea of Dependent Co-Arising, which is a philosophy 
that would allow for the concept of infinite regression to exist, in theory.  
 

 Seems to get down to the age-old discussion of dualistic vs non-dualistic 
view/approach.   
 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The Cosmological arguments of Aquinas.  Also discusses flaws and 
counterarguments.
 Aquinas basically examines causes and effects, saying that if one traces 
origins backwards, there can't be an infinite regress.  But on the contrary, 
that could be a  false presumption on his part.
 

 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course Philosophy #10 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course P... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY Our unit on the philosophy of 
religion and the existence of god continues with Thomas Aquinas. Today, we 
consider his first four arguments: the cosmological ...


 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 







[FairfieldLife] Re: Aquinas on God

2016-04-12 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 Judy,
 

 I personally liked to use the Kalaam Cosmological Argument (KCA) when 
discussing this topic.  I enjoyed debating this topic with our former members, 
like Curtis and Xeno.  But they seemed to skip a thought in making their 
position, or gloss over a counter point,  which convinced me that arguing with 
them was pointless.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Be aware that "first cause" in Aquinas's thinking doesn't mean *temporal* 
first cause but *ontological* first cause. 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The Cosmological arguments of Aquinas.  Also discusses flaws and 
counterarguments.
 Aquinas basically examines causes and effects, saying that if one traces 
origins backwards, there can't be an infinite regress.  But on the contrary, 
that could be a  false presumption on his part.
 

 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course Philosophy #10 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course P... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY Our unit on the philosophy of 
religion and the existence of god continues with Thomas Aquinas. Today, we 
consider his first four arguments: the cosmological ...


 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 







[FairfieldLife] Re: Aquinas on God

2016-04-12 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Emily, 

 When the so-called atheists, like Xeno and Curtis, were members here in this 
forum, I used the Kalaam Cosmological to argue the position of theism.
 

 Kalam cosmological argument - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalam_cosmological_argument 
 
 Kalam cosmological argument - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalam_cosmological_argument The Kalām 
cosmological argument (sometimes capitalized as Kalam Cosmological Argument; 
abbreviated KCA) is a modern formulation of the cosmological argument for the 
existence of God rooted in the Ilm al-Kalam heritage in medieval Islamic 
scholasticism. An outspoken ...
 
 
 
 View on en.wikipedia.org 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalam_cosmological_argument 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 

 But they found ways to run around the subject and present their own arguments. 
 As I mentioned to fuxero, MMY decided to avoid the infinite regress argument 
by presenting his idean of the Unified Field.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 These Crash Courses are good at instructing the ignorant masses.   

 At about 8:15 in, he states that Aquinas takes it as a given that everything 
must have a cause other than itself, and that therefore, his argument of God as 
"first cause" is self-defeating because why wouldn't "God" have to abide by the 
same "rules."  I thought that was one of the deals with theism - no "God" 
doesn't abide by the same "rules" as his creation.  
 

 I don't try to talk intelligently about any of this because I'm such a novice, 
but just read the Buddhist idea of Dependent Co-Arising, which is a philosophy 
that would allow for the concept of infinite regression to exist, in theory.  
 

 Seems to get down to the age-old discussion of dualistic vs non-dualistic 
view/approach.   
 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The Cosmological arguments of Aquinas.  Also discusses flaws and 
counterarguments.
 Aquinas basically examines causes and effects, saying that if one traces 
origins backwards, there can't be an infinite regress.  But on the contrary, 
that could be a  false presumption on his part.
 

 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course Philosophy #10 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course P... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY Our unit on the philosophy of 
religion and the existence of god continues with Thomas Aquinas. Today, we 
consider his first four arguments: the cosmological ...


 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 








[FairfieldLife] Re: Aquinas on God

2016-04-12 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
The apparent weaknesses in the arguments of Aquinas is probably the reason why 
MMY decided to explain existence in holistic terms, such as the 
rishi-devata-chandas relationship within the Unified Field.  Dr. Tony Nader 
gave a lecture at Stanford on this subject about a year ago, which is available 
on YouTube.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The Cosmological arguments of Aquinas.  Also discusses flaws and 
counterarguments.
 Aquinas basically examines causes and effects, saying that if one traces 
origins backwards, there can't be an infinite regress.  But on the contrary, 
that could be a  false presumption on his part.
 

 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course Philosophy #10 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course P... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY Our unit on the philosophy of 
religion and the existence of god continues with Thomas Aquinas. Today, we 
consider his first four arguments: the cosmological ...


 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Aquinas on God

2016-04-11 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Be aware that "first cause" in Aquinas's thinking doesn't mean *temporal* first 
cause but *ontological* first cause. 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The Cosmological arguments of Aquinas.  Also discusses flaws and 
counterarguments.
 Aquinas basically examines causes and effects, saying that if one traces 
origins backwards, there can't be an infinite regress.  But on the contrary, 
that could be a  false presumption on his part.
 

 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course Philosophy #10 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course P... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY Our unit on the philosophy of 
religion and the existence of god continues with Thomas Aquinas. Today, we 
consider his first four arguments: the cosmological ...


 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Aquinas on God

2016-04-11 Thread emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
These Crash Courses are good at instructing the ignorant masses.   

 At about 8:15 in, he states that Aquinas takes it as a given that everything 
must have a cause other than itself, and that therefore, his argument of God as 
"first cause" is self-defeating because why wouldn't "God" have to abide by the 
same "rules."  I thought that was one of the deals with theism - no "God" 
doesn't abide by the same "rules" as his creation.  
 

 I don't try to talk intelligently about any of this because I'm such a novice, 
but just read the Buddhist idea of Dependent Co-Arising, which is a philosophy 
that would allow for the concept of infinite regression to exist, in theory.  
 

 Seems to get down to the age-old discussion of dualistic vs non-dualistic 
view/approach.   
 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The Cosmological arguments of Aquinas.  Also discusses flaws and 
counterarguments.
 Aquinas basically examines causes and effects, saying that if one traces 
origins backwards, there can't be an infinite regress.  But on the contrary, 
that could be a  false presumption on his part.
 

 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course Philosophy #10 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY
 
 Aquinas and the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course P... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY Our unit on the philosophy of 
religion and the existence of god continues with Thomas Aquinas. Today, we 
consider his first four arguments: the cosmological ...


 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgisehuGOyY 
 Preview by Yahoo