Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Much Ado About Nothing
turq, here's a fun interview with Nathan about his experience with Joss and gang. http://www.vulture.com/2012/09/fillion-on-joss-whedons-shakespeare-brunches.html On Friday, November 8, 2013 12:15 AM, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: You won't believe this but I watched the movie yesterday! Really! Maybe there is something in the idea of synchronicity. I was going to recommend it to FFL also - under the title Shakespeare without Tears. The tricky choice with the Bard's plays is always whether you show them in period costume or go for a modern setting and somehow have to make allowances for the archaic speech. Much Ado simply ignored the dilemma and played it straight. One of the best film adaptations of Shakespeare I've ever seen. I've never heard of Amy Acker, before but she was fantastic. Actually all the cast were good but she was outstanding. Amy has worked with Joss many times in the past, starting with a long stint as Illyria / Winifred 'Fred' Burkle on Angel, then with a major role as Dr. Claire Saunders / Whiskey in Dollhouse. Along the way she's had long, repeating roles on Alias and a meaty role in Joss' The Cabin in the Woods. Currently she's landed a plum role on Johnathan Nolan's Person Of Interest, as the charmingly beautiful psychopath Root, who thinks she is talking to God and, in fact, is, because the all-knowing, all-seeing God talks back to her. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@ wrote: It's been available at Redbox for a few weeks but I was vested in a 31 days of horror fest so haven't gotten to it yet. On 11/07/2013 02:07 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: No, this is not a cafe rap about Fairfield Life and its daily squabbles. It's a review of a film that I have been dying to see, but have been unable to because it won't be officially released either in France or in the Netherlands until January. But the pirateverse hath come to the rescue -- I scored a 1080p version, and just finished watching it. To fully appreciate the film, it really helps to know a little about the making of the film. It was produced, directed, shot, and scored by Joss Whedon, while on leave from the filming of The Avengers during a contractually-forced two week hiatus. Some guys, especially if they were in the middle of making the film that would go on to become the highest-grossing film in history, would kick back and relax during those two weeks. Joss made a movie instead. He paid for it himself, recruited former actors he'd worked with before to appear in it, and shot it all in 12 days. In his house. This last bit is important, because Joss first conceived of the idea in that house (designed by his wife) years earlier when they were hosting Shakespeare readings at the house. He shoots using hand-held cameras and found lighting -- Our lighting package rose in the east and set in the west. And while making the movie itself was Joss' way of having fun, one aspect of the production he described as terrifying. He wrote the music, along the way scoring two of the songs that Shakespeare wrote for the play. The songs were recorded by Joss' brother Jed and his wife Maurissa Tancharoen, while Joss' wife kinda ran both the production and the household as her house was invaded by a host of actors and film crew for two weeks. So it was a real family affair. That said, the play's afoot...let us proceed. Suffice it to say that this is a film adaptation by Joss Whedon, so there has to be a *twist*, some way of seeing the Bard's words anew, as no one else has ever seen them before. Joss manages all of this with one scene, shown in silence before the credits. I can say no more (insert Zip it! sketch here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32C0eKRQVt8), except to say that this one scene *completely* transforms Shakespeare's play into something infinitely more understandable in our era, and renders the interplay between Beatrice (Amy Acker) and Benedick (Alexis Denisof) more believable in a more sexually liberated era. I am a *serious* fan of Amy Acker, and she doth not disappoint in this retelling of the Bard's tale. Nathan Fillion is charming in a short cameo as Dogberry, one of the most inept cops in playwriting history. The other cast (many of them faces, if not names, you'll know from Joss' other works) are equally up to their task of Having Fun. I really liked Much Ado About Nothing, and recommend it highly to 1) Shakespeare fans -- you'll never see a more creative adaptation of the Bard's work, 2) Joss Whedon fans -- your love for the man will only be increased by your knowledge of what the place he lives in looks like, and 3) lovers of great comedy -- this play is considered one of Shakespeare's best comedies -- produced lovingly, well, and with abundant humor. Think about it. The entire movie was
[FairfieldLife] RE: Much Ado About Nothing
You won't believe this but I watched the movie yesterday! Really! Maybe there is something in the idea of synchronicity. I was going to recommend it to FFL also - under the title Shakespeare without Tears. The tricky choice with the Bard's plays is always whether you show them in period costume or go for a modern setting and somehow have to make allowances for the archaic speech. Much Ado simply ignored the dilemma and played it straight. One of the best film adaptations of Shakespeare I've ever seen. I've never heard of Amy Acker, before but she was fantastic. Actually all the cast were good but she was outstanding. Shot in black-and-white - apparently to give a nod to the old screwball comedies. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk5kkLNPg8g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk5kkLNPg8g ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote: It's been available at Redbox for a few weeks but I was vested in a 31 days of horror fest so haven't gotten to it yet. On 11/07/2013 02:07 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: No, this is not a cafe rap about Fairfield Life and its daily squabbles. It's a review of a film that I have been dying to see, but have been unable to because it won't be officially released either in France or in the Netherlands until January. But the pirateverse hath come to the rescue -- I scored a 1080p version, and just finished watching it. To fully appreciate the film, it really helps to know a little about the making of the film. It was produced, directed, shot, and scored by Joss Whedon, while on leave from the filming of The Avengers during a contractually-forced two week hiatus. Some guys, especially if they were in the middle of making the film that would go on to become the highest-grossing film in history, would kick back and relax during those two weeks. Joss made a movie instead. He paid for it himself, recruited former actors he'd worked with before to appear in it, and shot it all in 12 days. In his house. This last bit is important, because Joss first conceived of the idea in that house (designed by his wife) years earlier when they were hosting Shakespeare readings at the house. He shoots using hand-held cameras and found lighting -- Our lighting package rose in the east and set in the west. And while making the movie itself was Joss' way of having fun, one aspect of the production he described as terrifying. He wrote the music, along the way scoring two of the songs that Shakespeare wrote for the play. The songs were recorded by Joss' brother Jed and his wife Maurissa Tancharoen, while Joss' wife kinda ran both the production and the household as her house was invaded by a host of actors and film crew for two weeks. So it was a real family affair. That said, the play's afoot...let us proceed. Suffice it to say that this is a film adaptation by Joss Whedon, so there has to be a *twist*, some way of seeing the Bard's words anew, as no one else has ever seen them before. Joss manages all of this with one scene, shown in silence before the credits. I can say no more (insert Zip it! sketch here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32C0eKRQVt8), except to say that this one scene *completely* transforms Shakespeare's play into something infinitely more understandable in our era, and renders the interplay between Beatrice (Amy Acker) and Benedick (Alexis Denisof) more believable in a more sexually liberated era. I am a *serious* fan of Amy Acker, and she doth not disappoint in this retelling of the Bard's tale. Nathan Fillion is charming in a short cameo as Dogberry, one of the most inept cops in playwriting history. The other cast (many of them faces, if not names, you'll know from Joss' other works) are equally up to their task of Having Fun. I really liked Much Ado About Nothing, and recommend it highly to 1) Shakespeare fans -- you'll never see a more creative adaptation of the Bard's work, 2) Joss Whedon fans -- your love for the man will only be increased by your knowledge of what the place he lives in looks like, and 3) lovers of great comedy -- this play is considered one of Shakespeare's best comedies -- produced lovingly, well, and with abundant humor. Think about it. The entire movie was done by A Group Of Friends On Vacation, doing all of this for FUN. There is a certain magic in this.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Much Ado About Nothing
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote: You won't believe this but I watched the movie yesterday! Really! Maybe there is something in the idea of synchronicity. I was going to recommend it to FFL also - under the title Shakespeare without Tears. The tricky choice with the Bard's plays is always whether you show them in period costume or go for a modern setting and somehow have to make allowances for the archaic speech. Much Ado simply ignored the dilemma and played it straight. One of the best film adaptations of Shakespeare I've ever seen. I've never heard of Amy Acker, before but she was fantastic. Actually all the cast were good but she was outstanding. Shot in black-and-white - apparently to give a nod to the old screwball comedies. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk5kkLNPg8g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk5kkLNPg8g Great, I love the music and the preview certainly made me want to see this. Looking forward to it. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote: It's been available at Redbox for a few weeks but I was vested in a 31 days of horror fest so haven't gotten to it yet. On 11/07/2013 02:07 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: No, this is not a cafe rap about Fairfield Life and its daily squabbles. It's a review of a film that I have been dying to see, but have been unable to because it won't be officially released either in France or in the Netherlands until January. But the pirateverse hath come to the rescue -- I scored a 1080p version, and just finished watching it. To fully appreciate the film, it really helps to know a little about the making of the film. It was produced, directed, shot, and scored by Joss Whedon, while on leave from the filming of The Avengers during a contractually-forced two week hiatus. Some guys, especially if they were in the middle of making the film that would go on to become the highest-grossing film in history, would kick back and relax during those two weeks. Joss made a movie instead. He paid for it himself, recruited former actors he'd worked with before to appear in it, and shot it all in 12 days. In his house. This last bit is important, because Joss first conceived of the idea in that house (designed by his wife) years earlier when they were hosting Shakespeare readings at the house. He shoots using hand-held cameras and found lighting -- Our lighting package rose in the east and set in the west. And while making the movie itself was Joss' way of having fun, one aspect of the production he described as terrifying. He wrote the music, along the way scoring two of the songs that Shakespeare wrote for the play. The songs were recorded by Joss' brother Jed and his wife Maurissa Tancharoen, while Joss' wife kinda ran both the production and the household as her house was invaded by a host of actors and film crew for two weeks. So it was a real family affair. That said, the play's afoot...let us proceed. Suffice it to say that this is a film adaptation by Joss Whedon, so there has to be a *twist*, some way of seeing the Bard's words anew, as no one else has ever seen them before. Joss manages all of this with one scene, shown in silence before the credits. I can say no more (insert Zip it! sketch here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32C0eKRQVt8), except to say that this one scene *completely* transforms Shakespeare's play into something infinitely more understandable in our era, and renders the interplay between Beatrice (Amy Acker) and Benedick (Alexis Denisof) more believable in a more sexually liberated era. I am a *serious* fan of Amy Acker, and she doth not disappoint in this retelling of the Bard's tale. Nathan Fillion is charming in a short cameo as Dogberry, one of the most inept cops in playwriting history. The other cast (many of them faces, if not names, you'll know from Joss' other works) are equally up to their task of Having Fun. I really liked Much Ado About Nothing, and recommend it highly to 1) Shakespeare fans -- you'll never see a more creative adaptation of the Bard's work, 2) Joss Whedon fans -- your love for the man will only be increased by your knowledge of what the place he lives in looks like, and 3) lovers of great comedy -- this play is considered one of Shakespeare's best comedies -- produced lovingly, well, and with abundant humor. Think about it. The entire movie was done by A Group Of Friends On Vacation, doing all of this for FUN. There is a certain magic in this.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Much Ado About Nothing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: You won't believe this but I watched the movie yesterday! Really! Maybe there is something in the idea of synchronicity. I was going to recommend it to FFL also - under the title Shakespeare without Tears. The tricky choice with the Bard's plays is always whether you show them in period costume or go for a modern setting and somehow have to make allowances for the archaic speech. Much Ado simply ignored the dilemma and played it straight. One of the best film adaptations of Shakespeare I've ever seen. I've never heard of Amy Acker, before but she was fantastic. Actually all the cast were good but she was outstanding. Amy has worked with Joss many times in the past, starting with a long stint as Illyria http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0004931/ / Winifred 'Fred' Burkle http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0004932/ on Angel, then with a major role as Dr. Claire Saunders http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0076511/ / Whiskey http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0175829/ in Dollhouse. Along the way she's had long, repeating roles on Alias and a meaty role in Joss' The Cabin in the Woods. Currently she's landed a plum role on Johnathan Nolan's Person Of Interest, as the charmingly beautiful psychopath Root, who thinks she is talking to God and, in fact, is, because the all-knowing, all-seeing God talks back to her. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@ wrote: It's been available at Redbox for a few weeks but I was vested in a 31 days of horror fest so haven't gotten to it yet. On 11/07/2013 02:07 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: No, this is not a cafe rap about Fairfield Life and its daily squabbles. It's a review of a film that I have been dying to see, but have been unable to because it won't be officially released either in France or in the Netherlands until January. But the pirateverse hath come to the rescue -- I scored a 1080p version, and just finished watching it. To fully appreciate the film, it really helps to know a little about the making of the film. It was produced, directed, shot, and scored by Joss Whedon, while on leave from the filming of The Avengers during a contractually-forced two week hiatus. Some guys, especially if they were in the middle of making the film that would go on to become the highest-grossing film in history, would kick back and relax during those two weeks. Joss made a movie instead. He paid for it himself, recruited former actors he'd worked with before to appear in it, and shot it all in 12 days. In his house. This last bit is important, because Joss first conceived of the idea in that house (designed by his wife) years earlier when they were hosting Shakespeare readings at the house. He shoots using hand-held cameras and found lighting -- Our lighting package rose in the east and set in the west. And while making the movie itself was Joss' way of having fun, one aspect of the production he described as terrifying. He wrote the music, along the way scoring two of the songs that Shakespeare wrote for the play. The songs were recorded by Joss' brother Jed and his wife Maurissa Tancharoen, while Joss' wife kinda ran both the production and the household as her house was invaded by a host of actors and film crew for two weeks. So it was a real family affair. That said, the play's afoot...let us proceed. Suffice it to say that this is a film adaptation by Joss Whedon, so there has to be a *twist*, some way of seeing the Bard's words anew, as no one else has ever seen them before. Joss manages all of this with one scene, shown in silence before the credits. I can say no more (insert Zip it! sketch here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32C0eKRQVt8), except to say that this one scene *completely* transforms Shakespeare's play into something infinitely more understandable in our era, and renders the interplay between Beatrice (Amy Acker) and Benedick (Alexis Denisof) more believable in a more sexually liberated era. I am a *serious* fan of Amy Acker, and she doth not disappoint in this retelling of the Bard's tale. Nathan Fillion is charming in a short cameo as Dogberry, one of the most inept cops in playwriting history. The other cast (many of them faces, if not names, you'll know from Joss' other works) are equally up to their task of Having Fun. I really liked Much Ado About Nothing, and recommend it highly to 1) Shakespeare fans -- you'll never see a more creative adaptation of the Bard's work, 2) Joss Whedon fans -- your love for the man will only be increased by your knowledge of what the place he lives in looks like, and 3) lovers of great comedy -- this play is considered one of Shakespeare's best comedies -- produced lovingly, well, and with abundant humor. Think about it. The entire movie was done by A Group Of Friends On Vacation, doing all of this for FUN. There is a certain magic in this.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Much Ado About Nothing
IMO, Krauss chickened out of the debate. And the organizer, Mr. DeGrasse Tyson who is a friend of Krauss was only too willing to disinvite Mr. Albert. Mr. Albert would have exposed the fallacies in the ideas of Krauss. The premise of Krauss' book is so erroneus a freshman student of Philosphy 101 would recognize the contradictions in logic. As such, one wonders why a major university is paying him to teach physics to students. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, PaliGap compost1uk@... wrote: No longer can you take your seats for Krauss v Albert - the Rumble In the Ontological Jungle. http://tinyurl.com/cmx9dfw Among the speakers will be several leading physicists, including Lawrence M. Krauss, whose book A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing became a cause célèbre in the scientific blogosphere last spring after a scathing review in the New York Times Book Review by the philosopher David Z. Albert. But Mr. Albert will not be onstage, having been abruptly disinvited by the museum several months after he agreed to take part. The tone of the dustup between Mr. Albert and Mr. Krauss summed up by one blogger as an ongoing cosmological street fight that had broken out broad media daylight would have certainly left those who saw both men's names on early publicity material anticipating something closer to a wrestling match than dispassionate scholarly discussion. In his review Mr. Albert, who also has a Ph.D. in theoretical physics, mocked Mr. Krauss's cocksure claim to have found in the laws of quantum mechanics a definitive answer to the vexing question of the ultimate origins of the universe. (So where did those laws come from? he asked.) Mr. Krauss countered with a pugnacious interview in The Atlantic, in which he called Mr. Albert moronic and dismissed the philosophy of science as worthless.
