[FairfieldLife] Re: Op-Ed and NPR interview : The Truth at the Heart of 'The Da Vinci Code'

2006-06-03 Thread amarnath



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 NPR - Talk of the Nation
 http://www.npr.org/templates/rundowns/rundown.php?prgId=5
 Religious historian Elaine Pagels says what is 
 important about The Da Vinci
 Code is not what the movie got wrong, but what it got right.
 

Perhaps the most important thing about the found 
gnostic gospels is that Jesus taught Mary 
how to enter the SILENCE

>From The Gospel According to Mary
http://www.gnosis.org/library/marygosp.htm 
21) The soul answered and said, What binds me has been slain, and 
what turns me about has been overcome,
22) and my desire has been ended, and ignorance has died.
23) In a aeon I was released from a world, and in a Type from a 
type, and from the fetter of oblivion which is transient.
24) From this time on will I attain to the rest of the time, of the 
season, of the aeon, in SILENCE.

Chapter 9
1) When Mary had said this, she fell SILENT, since it was to this 
point that the Savior had spoken with her.

Perhaps the most important thing about the found 
gnostic gospels is that Jesus taught Mary 
how to enter the SILENCE

God Bless,
anatol











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Religion and spirituality
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Op-Ed and NPR interview : The Truth at the Heart of 'The Da Vinci Code'

2006-06-02 Thread TurquoiseB



Excellent! Finally a sane voice in all this sound
and fury, signifying nothing. 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Truth at the Heart of 'The Da Vinci Code'
 
 by Elaine Pagels
 
 [Elaine Pagels, author of The Gnostic Gospels and Beyond Belief: 
The Secret
 Gospel of Thomas, is a professor of religion at Princeton. She 
wrote this
 article for the Perspective section of the San Jose Mercury News.]
 
 
 
 Archbishop Angelo Amato, a top Vatican official, recently railed 
against The
 Da Vinci Code as a work full of calumnies, offenses and 
historical and
 theological errors.'' As a historian, I would agree that no 
reputable
 scholar has ever found evidence of author Dan Brown's assertion 
that Jesus
 and Mary Magdalene married and had a child, and no scholar would 
take
 seriously Brown's conspiracy theories about the Catholic group 
Opus Dei.
 
 But what is compelling about Brown's work of fiction, and part of 
what may
 be worrying Catholic and evangelical leaders, is not the book's 
many
 falsehoods.
 
 What has kept Brown on the bestseller list for years and inspired 
a movie
 is, instead, what is true – that some views of Christian history 
were buried
 for centuries because leaders of the early Catholic Church wanted 
to present
 one version of Jesus' life: theirs.
 
 Some of the alternative views of who Jesus was and what he taught 
were
 discovered in 1945 when a farmer in Egypt accidentally dug up an 
ancient jar
 containing more than 50 ancient writings. These documents include 
gospels
 that were banned by early church leaders, who declared them 
blasphemous.
 
 It is not surprising that The Da Vinci Code builds on the idea 
that many
 early gospels were hidden and previously unknown. Brown has said 
that part
 of his inspiration was one of these so-called Gnostic Gospels as 
presented
 in a book I wrote on the subject. It took only three lines from 
the Gospel
 of Philip to send Brown off to write his novel:
 
 The companion of the savior is Mary Magdalene. And Jesus loved her 
more than
 all the disciples, and used to kiss her often... The rest of the 
disciples
 were jealous, and said to him, Why do you love her more than all 
of us?''
 
 Those who have studied the Gospel of Philip see it as a mystical 
text and
 don't take the suggestion that Jesus had a sexual relationship 
with Mary
 Magdalene literally.
 
 Still, by homing in on that passage and building a book around it, 
Brown
 brought up subjects that the Catholic Church would like to avoid. 
He raised
 the big what-ifs: What if the version of Jesus' life that 
Christians are
 taught isn't the right one? And perhaps as troubling in a still-
patriarchal
 church: What if Mary Magdalene played a more important role in 
Jesus' life
 than we've been led to believe, not as his wife perhaps, but as a 
beloved
 and valued disciple?
 
 In other words, what Brown did with his runaway hit was popularize 
awareness
 of the discovery of many other secret gospels, including the 
Gospel of Judas
 that was published in April.
 
 There have long been hints that the New Testament wasn't the only 
version of
 Jesus' life that existed, and that even the gospels presented 
there were
 subject to misinterpretation. In 1969, for instance, the Catholic 
Church
 ruled that Mary Magdalene was not a prostitute, as many people had 
been
 taught. The church blamed the error on Pope Gregory the Great, who 
in 591
 A.D. gave a sermon in which he apparently conflated several women 
in the
 Bible, including Mary Magdalene and an unnamed sinner who washes 
Jesus' feet
 with her tears.
 
 But even that news didn't reach all Christians, and it is the rare 
religious
 leader who now works hard to spread the word that the New 
Testament is just
 one version of events crafted in the intellectual free-for-all 
after
 Christ's death. At that time, church leaders were competing with 
each other
 to figure out what Christ said, what he meant -- and perhaps most 
important,
 what writings would best support the emerging church.
 
 What we know now is that the scholars who championed 
the Gnostic'' gospels
 are among the ones who lost the battle.
 
 In the decades after Jesus' death, these texts and many others were
 circulating widely among Christian groups from Egypt to Rome, 
Africa to
 Spain, and from today's Turkey and Syria to France. So many 
Christians
 throughout the world knew and revered these books that it took 
more than 200
 years for hardworking church leaders who denounced the texts to 
successfully
 suppress them.
 
 The copies discovered in 1945, for example, were taken from the 
sacred
 library of one of the earliest monasteries in Egypt, founded about 
10 years
 after the conversion of Constantine, the first Roman emperor to 
join the
 fledgling church. For the first time, Christians were no longer 
treated as
 members of a dangerous and seditious group and could form open 
communities
 in which many lived 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Op-Ed and NPR interview : The Truth at the Heart of 'The Da Vinci Code'

2006-06-02 Thread Vaj




On Jun 2, 2006, at 12:12 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:

 Great post, great questions raised.

 I will, of course, only focus on this one:

 The companion of the savior is Mary Magdalene. And Jesus loved her
 more than all the disciples, and used to kiss her often... The rest of
 the disciples were jealous, and said to him, Why do you love her more
 than all of us?'

 Cuz, although Jesus lived in a village, he was not one of the Village
 People.


...although he is ostensibly the founder of the YMCA... ;-)






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Religion and spirituality
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Op-Ed and NPR interview : The Truth at the Heart of 'The Da Vinci Code'

2006-06-02 Thread uns_tressor



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Excellent! Finally a sane voice in all this sound
 and fury, signifying nothing. 

... a poor player that struts and frets 
his hour upon the stage and then is 
heard no more. 

It is a tale told by an idiot, 
full of sound and fury, signifying 
nothing. 

---Never mix fact with fantasy---











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Religion and spirituality
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Op-Ed and NPR interview : The Truth at the Heart of 'The Da Vinci Code'

2006-06-01 Thread curtisdeltablues



Great post, great questions raised.

I will, of course, only focus on this one:

The companion of the savior is Mary Magdalene. And Jesus loved her
more than all the disciples, and used to kiss her often... The rest of
the disciples were jealous, and said to him, Why do you love her more
than all of us?'

Cuz, although Jesus lived in a village, he was not one of the Village
People.






--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 NPR - The Op-Ed Pages
 
 Opinion Page: 'Da Vinci Code' Truths
 
 NPR - Talk of the Nation
 http://www.npr.org/templates/rundowns/rundown.php?prgId=5 , May
22, 2006 ·
 Religious historian Elaine Pagels says what is important about The
Da Vinci
 Code is not what the movie got wrong, but what it got right.
 
 
 
 ===
 
 You can listen to the interview and caller questions mentioned above at:
 
 http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5422695
 
 ===
 
 Op-Ed
 
 The Truth at the Heart of 'The Da Vinci Code'
 
 by Elaine Pagels
 
 
 
 [Elaine Pagels, author of The Gnostic Gospels and Beyond Belief: The
Secret
 Gospel of Thomas, is a professor of religion at Princeton. She wrote
this
 article for the Perspective section of the San Jose Mercury News.]
 
 
 
 Archbishop Angelo Amato, a top Vatican official, recently railed
against The
 Da Vinci Code as a work full of calumnies, offenses and historical and
 theological errors.'' As a historian, I would agree that no reputable
 scholar has ever found evidence of author Dan Brown's assertion that
Jesus
 and Mary Magdalene married and had a child, and no scholar would take
 seriously Brown's conspiracy theories about the Catholic group Opus Dei.
 
 But what is compelling about Brown's work of fiction, and part of
what may
 be worrying Catholic and evangelical leaders, is not the book's many
 falsehoods.
 
 What has kept Brown on the bestseller list for years and inspired a
movie
 is, instead, what is true – that some views of Christian history
were buried
 for centuries because leaders of the early Catholic Church wanted to
present
 one version of Jesus' life: theirs.
 
 Some of the alternative views of who Jesus was and what he taught were
 discovered in 1945 when a farmer in Egypt accidentally dug up an
ancient jar
 containing more than 50 ancient writings. These documents include
gospels
 that were banned by early church leaders, who declared them blasphemous.
 
 It is not surprising that The Da Vinci Code builds on the idea that many
 early gospels were hidden and previously unknown. Brown has said
that part
 of his inspiration was one of these so-called Gnostic Gospels as
presented
 in a book I wrote on the subject. It took only three lines from the
Gospel
 of Philip to send Brown off to write his novel:
 
 The companion of the savior is Mary Magdalene. And Jesus loved her
more than
 all the disciples, and used to kiss her often... The rest of the
disciples
 were jealous, and said to him, Why do you love her more than all of
us?''
 
 Those who have studied the Gospel of Philip see it as a mystical
text and
 don't take the suggestion that Jesus had a sexual relationship with Mary
 Magdalene literally.
 
 Still, by homing in on that passage and building a book around it, Brown
 brought up subjects that the Catholic Church would like to avoid. He
raised
 the big what-ifs: What if the version of Jesus' life that Christians are
 taught isn't the right one? And perhaps as troubling in a
still-patriarchal
 church: What if Mary Magdalene played a more important role in
Jesus' life
 than we've been led to believe, not as his wife perhaps, but as a
beloved
 and valued disciple?
 
 In other words, what Brown did with his runaway hit was popularize
awareness
 of the discovery of many other secret gospels, including the Gospel
of Judas
 that was published in April.
 
 There have long been hints that the New Testament wasn't the only
version of
 Jesus' life that existed, and that even the gospels presented there were
 subject to misinterpretation. In 1969, for instance, the Catholic Church
 ruled that Mary Magdalene was not a prostitute, as many people had been
 taught. The church blamed the error on Pope Gregory the Great, who
in 591
 A.D. gave a sermon in which he apparently conflated several women in the
 Bible, including Mary Magdalene and an unnamed sinner who washes
Jesus' feet
 with her tears.
 
 But even that news didn't reach all Christians, and it is the rare
religious
 leader who now works hard to spread the word that the New Testament
is just
 one version of events crafted in the intellectual free-for-all after
 Christ's death. At that time, church leaders were competing with
each other
 to figure out what Christ said, what he meant -- and perhaps most
important,
 what writings would best support the emerging church.
 
 What we know now is that the scholars who championed the Gnostic''
gospels
 are among the ones who lost the battle.
 
 In the decades after Jesus' death, these texts and