[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-21 Thread dhamiltony2k5
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Community?
 
 
 Does the movement have no care program for its old?  
 

 sympathetic care given to their own in the last days.   

Is the TMorg 
of Maharishi too consumed with fund-raising and building utopias to 
care about its people?
 
 
 -Doug in FF 


Maharishi has in recent times grown fond of using the phrase, Mind 
your own business.  In minding their business, which part of his 
(Maharishi's) family is the stronger hand in his business?  The 
Varmas or Shrivastavas?  

Just wondering about the family dynamics there,

-Doug in FF  




[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-21 Thread shukra69
In mind our own business he was referring only to not paying 
attention to the news but going deep into the TM and TM-Sidhi 
practice. 
Not about anything else.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
 dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
 
  Community?
  
  
  Does the movement have no care program for its old?  
  
 
  sympathetic care given to their own in the last days.   
 
 Is the TMorg 
 of Maharishi too consumed with fund-raising and building utopias 
to 
 care about its people?
  
  
  -Doug in FF 
 
 
 Maharishi has in recent times grown fond of using the 
phrase, Mind 
 your own business.  In minding their business, which part of his 
 (Maharishi's) family is the stronger hand in his business?  The 
 Varmas or Shrivastavas?  
 
 Just wondering about the family dynamics there,
 
 -Doug in FF





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread sparaig

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ 
  wrote:
  
   
   On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:59 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:
Why doesn't anyone ever name names on this site. Who is dying and
who shot themselves?
   
   M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any suicides?  I 
   haven't, and there hasn't been anything in the papers either.   
  Would 
   definitely be front-page news in a town this size.
  
  I think this rumor may have been started by
  Knapp on his blog:
  
  Sad News: Possible MUM Suicide
   
  Posted by John M. Knapp, LMSW at 1/19/2007 10:36:00 AM 
  
  We have received a report this morning that a Maharishi University of 
  Management recently committed suicide by a shot to the head. We hope 
  to confirm this report this morning. We express condolences to the 
  family and friends of the deceased.
 

Seems to me that these happened in the past 5 or TEN years, not the last 1 or 
2...


Follow Up on Rumored MUM Suicide January 2007
Posted by Gina at 1/20/2007 01:42:00 AM
My good friend in Fairfield checked with TM village criers. There is no word 
about a 
recent suicide on MUM campus.

She said they calmly responded, THAT one is just a rumor. They continued with 
their 
cafe' dinner. Suicides and other tragic stories of medical  financial neglect 
are common 
features of TM Organization life.

Then she offered, but do you want to know about our community suicides of the 
last year 
or two? .. one woman put her head in an oven, another man hanged himself in his 
basement, and someone jumped in front of a moving train. It's all so sad.



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, m2smart4u2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Why doesn't anyone ever name names on this site. Who is  
 dying and who shot themselves?

Ah, another Neo-Advaitan.

:-)






Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Jan 19, 2007, at 10:41 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:

 snip
 OK Doug H, you were the original poster. Who is dying and who
 committed suicide?

Apparently Doug has checked out on this one.  Starting rumors is a lot 
easier than confirming them, it would appear.

Sal



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ 
 wrote:
 
  
  On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:59 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:
   Why doesn't anyone ever name names on this site. Who is dying and
   who shot themselves?
  
  M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any suicides?  I 
  haven't, and there hasn't been anything in the papers either.   
 Would 
  definitely be front-page news in a town this size.
 
 I think this rumor may have been started by
 Knapp on his blog:
 
 Sad News: Possible MUM Suicide
  
 Posted by John M. Knapp, LMSW at 1/19/2007 10:36:00 AM 

Doug's post to FFL containing the rumor is dated earlier than that
blog entry:

Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:42 am

I'm more inclined to believe he reposted on his blog the rumor he read
on FFL.

 



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread TurquoiseB
   M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any 
   suicides?  I haven't, and there hasn't been anything 
   in the papers either. Would definitely be front-page 
   news in a town this size.
  
  I think this rumor may have been started by
  Knapp on his blog:
  
  Sad News: Possible MUM Suicide
   
  Posted by John M. Knapp, LMSW at 1/19/2007 10:36:00 AM 
 
 Doug's post to FFL containing the rumor is dated earlier 
 than that blog entry:
 
 Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:42 am
 
 I'm more inclined to believe he reposted on his blog the 
 rumor he read on FFL.

I noticed this, too, just as I did my research
after reading the first mention of the rumor 
here by searching the online version of the 
Fairfield Ledger. I couldn't find anything there 
or on Google or in any of the neighboring Iowa 
papers, so I chalked it up as a rumor, and didn't 
bother to comment on it here. Especially because 
a few others had already done so, asking for 
validation of the rumor.

Compare and contrast to (what appears to be) John
Knapp reading the rumor here, wanting to believe
it were true and thus *not* doing his research, 
and printing it on his blog as truth.

Also compare and contrast to one person here,
reading John Knapp's blog and finding his version 
of the rumor, wanting to believe it was the source
and thus *not* doing her research by checking the 
timestamps, and starting her own rumor that John 
was the original source of the first rumor.

It seems to me that in both of those cases what
is going on is a person who 1) has an agenda,
and 2) is willing to forward or start rumors
that *further* that agenda, without bothering
to verify their validity.

Fanatics against, fanatics for. Same modus
operandi. 





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread dhamiltony2k5
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Community?
 
 I understand that someone committed suicide on campus the other 
day, 
 shooting themselves in the head.

Om, check with the Sherriff dept.?   They were serving a paper to 
someone on campus, knocked on the door and heard a gunshot go off 
inside.  They were glad that it was not pointed at them.  Instead it 
was a self-inflicted 44 cal to the head.  

Yes with all the privacy rules now, it is interesting that no one can 
comment on a public incident that did happened.  Speak the sweet 
truth?  

One of the Utopia Park employees was with the deputy when it 
happened.  Of course no names can be given so the deputies are very 
careful in the recount but descriptive of something that evidently 
happened this week.  Everyone is cautious on all sides for different 
reasons of privacy.  

I was hoping someone like Sal who is more connected up here could 
come up with the name.  It is a sad story and would be nice to know 
the name to lend support to anyone if needed.

-Doug in FF




[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
 dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
 
  Community?
  
  I understand that someone committed suicide on campus the other 
  day, shooting themselves in the head.
 
 Om, check with the Sherriff dept.?   They were serving a paper 
 to someone on campus, knocked on the door and heard a gunshot 
 go off inside.  They were glad that it was not pointed at them. 
 Instead it was a self-inflicted 44 cal to the head.  
 
 Yes with all the privacy rules now, it is interesting that no 
 one can comment on a public incident that did happened. Speak 
 the sweet truth?  

Also, sadly, speak the truth that might best serve
family left behind, insurance-wise and in terms of
notifying them. There are many reasons that police
sometimes delay coming out with all the facts. I
trust that someone else will follow up there in
Fairfield and post further information when it
becomes available.

 One of the Utopia Park employees was with the deputy when it 
 happened.  Of course no names can be given so the deputies 
 are very careful in the recount but descriptive of something 
 that evidently happened this week.  Everyone is cautious on 
 all sides for different reasons of privacy.  

Exactly. It doesn't necessarily have to be a coverup 
on the part of the university, although I think we
all know that's a possibility.

 I was hoping someone like Sal who is more connected up here 
 could come up with the name. It is a sad story and would be 
 nice to know the name to lend support to anyone if needed.

Well said. When something like this happens, we often
tend to think of what the suicide *symbolizes*, in 
terms of our different beliefs or lack thereof. But
it's also good to remember that suicide is a great
deal more than a symbol, and affects a lot of very
real people, most of whom are caught unawares by
the action of someone they loved deeply. I had a 
brother who committed suicide. It's a bitch to deal
with. My best thoughts and wishes to those who may
be dealing with it there.





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Om, check with the Sherriff dept.?   They were serving a paper to 
 someone on campus, knocked on the door and heard a gunshot go off 
 inside.  They were glad that it was not pointed at them.  Instead 
it was a self-inflicted 44 cal to the head.  
 
 Yes with all the privacy rules now, it is interesting that no one 
can 
 comment on a public incident that did happened.  Speak the sweet 
 truth?  
 
 One of the Utopia Park employees was with the deputy when it 
 happened.  Of course no names can be given so the deputies are 
very careful in the recount but descriptive of something that 
evidently happened this week.  Everyone is cautious on all sides for 
different reasons of privacy.  
 
 I was hoping someone like Sal who is more connected up here could 
 come up with the name.  It is a sad story and would be nice to 
know the name to lend support to anyone if needed.
 
This nicely ties up all the loose ends with the Purusha person 
dying at Utopia park, the suicide, except that none of it is 
confirmed except by Doug.  Privacy rules when the police serve a 
warrant and hear a gunshot?  Come on.  That ain't how it works.  
This IS the stuff that makes the news.  Come clean Doug.

lurk





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Jan 20, 2007, at 8:41 AM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:

 This nicely ties up all the loose ends with the Purusha person
 dying at Utopia park, the suicide, except that none of it is
 confirmed except by Doug.  Privacy rules when the police serve a
 warrant and hear a gunshot?  Come on.  That ain't how it works.
 This IS the stuff that makes the news.  Come clean Doug.

Well, that's  what I thought too.  Aren't warrants, like arrests,  
public information?

Sal



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any 
suicides?  I haven't, and there hasn't been anything 
in the papers either. Would definitely be front-page 
news in a town this size.
   
   I think this rumor may have been started by
   Knapp on his blog:
   
   Sad News: Possible MUM Suicide

   Posted by John M. Knapp, LMSW at 1/19/2007 10:36:00 AM 
  
  Doug's post to FFL containing the rumor is dated earlier 
  than that blog entry:
  
  Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:42 am
  
  I'm more inclined to believe he reposted on his blog the 
  rumor he read on FFL.
 
 I noticed this, too, just as I did my research
 after reading the first mention of the rumor 
 here by searching the online version of the 
 Fairfield Ledger. I couldn't find anything there 
 or on Google or in any of the neighboring Iowa 
 papers, so I chalked it up as a rumor, and didn't 
 bother to comment on it here. Especially because 
 a few others had already done so, asking for 
 validation of the rumor.
 
 Compare and contrast to (what appears to be) John
 Knapp reading the rumor here, wanting to believe
 it were true and thus *not* doing his research, 
 and printing it on his blog as truth.
 
 Also compare and contrast to one person here,

Barry, why do you occasionally become afraid
of mentioning my name?

 reading John Knapp's blog and finding his version 
 of the rumor, wanting to believe it was the source
 and thus *not* doing her research by checking the 
 timestamps, and starting her own rumor that John 
 was the original source of the first rumor.

Timestamps, of course, may or may not tell the
whole story about who started a rumor when.
There *are* other means of communication than
via public postings to the Web.

Starting rumors is one of John Knapp's 
specialties, as Barry must remember from Knapp's
earlier glory days.  He can be quite clever
about it too: he's entirely capable of making
inquiries to certain Fairfield residents he
knows post here in the hope that they'll say
something about it, then once they've done so,
repeating the rumor on his blog as if it
hadn't come from him in the first place.

Whether that's what happened in this case is
still murky, but then I made it clear I was
speculating about Knapp having started it.

 It seems to me that in both of those cases what
 is going on is a person who 1) has an agenda,
 and 2) is willing to forward or start rumors
 that *further* that agenda, without bothering
 to verify their validity.

Actually I also checked the Fairfield papers
before I posted.

 Fanatics against, fanatics for. Same modus
 operandi.

You certainly could say I have an agenda where
John Knapp is concerned: to let those who have
never had any experience with him know (as
Barry does as well) that they shouldn't take
anything he says at face value.




[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
 M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any 
 suicides?  I haven't, and there hasn't been anything 
 in the papers either. Would definitely be front-page 
 news in a town this size.

I think this rumor may have been started by
Knapp on his blog:

Sad News: Possible MUM Suicide
 
Posted by John M. Knapp, LMSW at 1/19/2007 10:36:00 AM 
   
   Doug's post to FFL containing the rumor is dated earlier 
   than that blog entry:
   
   Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:42 am
   
   I'm more inclined to believe he reposted on his blog the 
   rumor he read on FFL.
  
  I noticed this, too, just as I did my research
  after reading the first mention of the rumor 
  here by searching the online version of the 
  Fairfield Ledger. I couldn't find anything there 
  or on Google or in any of the neighboring Iowa 
  papers, so I chalked it up as a rumor, and didn't 
  bother to comment on it here. Especially because 
  a few others had already done so, asking for 
  validation of the rumor.
  
  Compare and contrast to (what appears to be) John
  Knapp reading the rumor here, wanting to believe
  it were true and thus *not* doing his research, 
  and printing it on his blog as truth.
  
  Also compare and contrast to one person here,
 
 Barry, why do you occasionally become afraid
 of mentioning my name?

  reading John Knapp's blog and finding his version 
  of the rumor, wanting to believe it was the source
  and thus *not* doing her research by checking the 
  timestamps, and starting her own rumor that John 
  was the original source of the first rumor.
 
 Timestamps, of course, may or may not tell the
 whole story about who started a rumor when.
 There *are* other means of communication than
 via public postings to the Web.

So you're still claiming that John started the 
rumor, the same one that was posted earlier
here? Is this another time travel theory
on your part, or do you have specifics in
mind, rather than just inuendo.  :-)

 Starting rumors is one of John Knapp's 
 specialties, as Barry must remember from Knapp's
 earlier glory days.  He can be quite clever
 about it too: he's entirely capable of making
 inquiries to certain Fairfield residents he
 knows post here in the hope that they'll say
 something about it, then once they've done so,
 repeating the rumor on his blog as if it
 hadn't come from him in the first place.
 
 Whether that's what happened in this case is
 still murky, but then I made it clear I was
 speculating about Knapp having started it.

Note the above later, when I specify what 
Judy's agenda is.
 
  It seems to me that in both of those cases what
  is going on is a person who 1) has an agenda,
  and 2) is willing to forward or start rumors
  that *further* that agenda, without bothering
  to verify their validity.
 
 Actually I also checked the Fairfield papers
 before I posted.

I notice that you didn't choose to deal with
either point 1 or 2. Point 2 is now pretty much
a given in your case, since you chose to start
a rumor about John Knapp without verifying its
validity, something that would have taken less
than ten seconds. But as to point 1, *your*
agenda, I would suggest that it is to demonize 
and discredit any critic of TM and Maharishi.

You did so above. 

Having been caught doing it, you respond by
doing it again.

  Fanatics against, fanatics for. Same modus
  operandi.
 
 You certainly could say I have an agenda where
 John Knapp is concerned: to let those who have
 never had any experience with him know (as
 Barry does as well) that they shouldn't take
 anything he says at face value.

Funny, but that's your agenda with Vaj, and
with me, with Paul Mason, and with numerous
other people you've encountered on FFL, and
previously, on a.m.t. 

H. What do they all have in common? They've
all criticized TM and/or Maharishi. 

Unc

P.S. The last paragraph is a setup for you to
rush in and say, They're all LIARS or insert
derogatory statement here...I've 'proved' it 
numerous times, thus 'proving'my point about 
*your* agenda.

You don't like what these people say, and so
you attempt to influence others to disregard
what they say. That *is* your modus operandi;
you're a one-trick pony.

You may have convinced yourself that your 
agenda is against liars and intellectually
dishonest people, Judy, but I don't think
you've fooled many others. 





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread curtisdeltablues
Suspiciously high caliber gun in this story.  I've shot 44 mag rounds
and it is a freak'n canon.  Not a very enjoyable gun to shot for
targets, and is overkill for self-defense.   The kind of gun that
someone who has a bunch of guns would have in his collection.  In
Utopia park? The mystery deepens!

Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry:

Scorpio freezes, looking at his gun, and Callahan utters the most
famous lines in the movie: I know what you're thinking. 'Did he fire
six shots or only five?' Well, to tell you the truth, in all this
excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is a .44
Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your
head clean off, you've got to ask yourself a question: 'Do I feel
lucky?' Well, do ya, punk?


(For detail nuts there is a 50 cal handgun now)



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
 dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
 
  
  Om, check with the Sherriff dept.?   They were serving a paper to 
  someone on campus, knocked on the door and heard a gunshot go off 
  inside.  They were glad that it was not pointed at them.  Instead 
 it was a self-inflicted 44 cal to the head.  
  
  Yes with all the privacy rules now, it is interesting that no one 
 can 
  comment on a public incident that did happened.  Speak the sweet 
  truth?  
  
  One of the Utopia Park employees was with the deputy when it 
  happened.  Of course no names can be given so the deputies are 
 very careful in the recount but descriptive of something that 
 evidently happened this week.  Everyone is cautious on all sides for 
 different reasons of privacy.  
  
  I was hoping someone like Sal who is more connected up here could 
  come up with the name.  It is a sad story and would be nice to 
 know the name to lend support to anyone if needed.
  
 This nicely ties up all the loose ends with the Purusha person 
 dying at Utopia park, the suicide, except that none of it is 
 confirmed except by Doug.  Privacy rules when the police serve a 
 warrant and hear a gunshot?  Come on.  That ain't how it works.  
 This IS the stuff that makes the news.  Come clean Doug.
 
 lurk
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
snip
  Timestamps, of course, may or may not tell the
  whole story about who started a rumor when.
  There *are* other means of communication than
  via public postings to the Web.
 
 So you're still claiming that John started the 
 rumor, the same one that was posted earlier
 here?

How could I still claim this when I never 
claimed it to begin with?

I'm pointing out, of course, that the 
timestamps don't prove anything either way
about who started the rumor.

snip
   It seems to me that in both of those cases what
   is going on is a person who 1) has an agenda,
   and 2) is willing to forward or start rumors
   that *further* that agenda, without bothering
   to verify their validity.
  
  Actually I also checked the Fairfield papers
  before I posted.
 
 I notice that you didn't choose to deal with
 either point 1 or 2.

Actually I went on to deal with point 1, as you
know, because you commented on it.

 Point 2 is now pretty much
 a given in your case, since you chose to start
 a rumor about John Knapp without verifying its
 validity, something that would have taken less
 than ten seconds.

Gee, you're having reading comprehension problems
today, Barry.  The timestamps don't prove anything
either way, as I already pointed out.

Yes, I chose to *speculate*--again, on the basis
of long experience with Knapp--that it was he
who had started the rumor.

snip
  You certainly could say I have an agenda where
  John Knapp is concerned: to let those who have
  never had any experience with him know (as
  Barry does as well) that they shouldn't take
  anything he says at face value.
 
 Funny, but that's your agenda with Vaj, and
 with me, with Paul Mason, and with numerous
 other people you've encountered on FFL, and
 previously, on a.m.t. 
 
 H. What do they all have in common? They've
 all criticized TM and/or Maharishi. 
 
 Unc
 
 P.S. The last paragraph is a setup for you to
 rush in and say, They're all LIARS or insert
 derogatory statement here...I've 'proved' it 
 numerous times, thus 'proving'my point about 
 *your* agenda.

Well, no, that doesn't prove your point at all,
of course.  See below.

 You don't like what these people say, and so
 you attempt to influence others to disregard
 what they say. That *is* your modus operandi;
 you're a one-trick pony.

Well, no, actually my modus operandi is to
*demonstrate* that the TM critics who are
consistently dishonest--like yourself, Vaj,
and Knapp--can't be trusted.  (And of course
I have plenty of other tricks, such as,
for example, rational argument, a trick
that doesn't seem to be in your repertory
at all.)

 You may have convinced yourself that your 
 agenda is against liars and intellectually
 dishonest people, Judy, but I don't think
 you've fooled many others.

(Barry's appeal-to-consensus mantra again:
when he's having trouble making his point,
he conjures up a vast chorus agreeing with 
him.)

The problem with this fantasy, Barry, is that
it doesn't account for the fact that I *don't*
question the honesty of the vast majority of
TM critics here.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread Peter
I agree. A .44 is a nasty canon. I like a .45. Keeps
the heathens at bay. 9 mils are for the Pelosi crowd,
tree-huggers and those that complain about global
warming.
 
--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Suspiciously high caliber gun in this story.  I've
 shot 44 mag rounds
 and it is a freak'n canon.  Not a very enjoyable gun
 to shot for
 targets, and is overkill for self-defense.   The
 kind of gun that
 someone who has a bunch of guns would have in his
 collection.  In
 Utopia park? The mystery deepens!
 
 Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry:
 
 Scorpio freezes, looking at his gun, and Callahan
 utters the most
 famous lines in the movie: I know what you're
 thinking. 'Did he fire
 six shots or only five?' Well, to tell you the
 truth, in all this
 excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as
 this is a .44
 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and
 would blow your
 head clean off, you've got to ask yourself a
 question: 'Do I feel
 lucky?' Well, do ya, punk?
 
 
 (For detail nuts there is a 50 cal handgun now)
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 lurkernomore20002000
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 dhamiltony2k5 
  dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
  
   
   Om, check with the Sherriff dept.?   They were
 serving a paper to 
   someone on campus, knocked on the door and heard
 a gunshot go off 
   inside.  They were glad that it was not pointed
 at them.  Instead 
  it was a self-inflicted 44 cal to the head.  
   
   Yes with all the privacy rules now, it is
 interesting that no one 
  can 
   comment on a public incident that did happened. 
 Speak the sweet 
   truth?  
   
   One of the Utopia Park employees was with the
 deputy when it 
   happened.  Of course no names can be given so
 the deputies are 
  very careful in the recount but descriptive of
 something that 
  evidently happened this week.  Everyone is
 cautious on all sides for 
  different reasons of privacy.  
   
   I was hoping someone like Sal who is more
 connected up here could 
   come up with the name.  It is a sad story and
 would be nice to 
  know the name to lend support to anyone if needed.
   
  This nicely ties up all the loose ends with the
 Purusha person 
  dying at Utopia park, the suicide, except that
 none of it is 
  confirmed except by Doug.  Privacy rules when the
 police serve a 
  warrant and hear a gunshot?  Come on.  That ain't
 how it works.  
  This IS the stuff that makes the news.  Come clean
 Doug.
  
  lurk
  
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 




 

Get your own web address.  
Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL


[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When something like this happens, we often
 tend to think of what the suicide *symbolizes*, in 
 terms of our different beliefs or lack thereof. But
 it's also good to remember that suicide is a great
 deal more than a symbol, and affects a lot of very
 real people, most of whom are caught unawares by
 the action of someone they loved deeply. I had a 
 brother who committed suicide. It's a bitch to deal
 with. My best thoughts and wishes to those who may
 be dealing with it there.

Well said- I went through a similar experience, and you are right, the 
symbolic nature of the death obscures for those who didn't know the 
deceased the act felt in human terms by family and friends.



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread curtisdeltablues
Yeah the .45 is a real shooters gun.  My friends who are really into
competitions shoot that caliber.  Fantastic accuracy.  I opted for a
Walther PPKS 380.  I havn't shot it in years but it is a pleasure to
shoot.  I think a revolver is more practical for a self-defense piece
but I was a target shooter.  I used to go to a range that rented all
the calibers so I could try them all.  The 44 was so loud and there
was a muzzle flash that was way too distracting for me to be accurate
with it.  Someone brought in an 9 mil Uzi with a 25 round clip once. 
It was semi-auto but when they kept it rolling you really wanted to
hit the dirt.  Cops who face those kind of guns on the street have
balls of steel.  It creates a primal terror to hear so many rounds go
off.  Shooting 38s in a 357 mag gun is a nice way to shoot.  The heavy
gun loaded with a lighter round helps you relax as you squeeze the
trigger.  I never could enjoy even a 357 mag round though.  The kick
was just too unpleasant for me to breath properly to be accurate.  I
guess my balls are of a softer alloy!  But as Dirty Harry said A
man's got to know his limitations!




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I agree. A .44 is a nasty canon. I like a .45. Keeps
 the heathens at bay. 9 mils are for the Pelosi crowd,
 tree-huggers and those that complain about global
 warming.
  
 --- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  Suspiciously high caliber gun in this story.  I've
  shot 44 mag rounds
  and it is a freak'n canon.  Not a very enjoyable gun
  to shot for
  targets, and is overkill for self-defense.   The
  kind of gun that
  someone who has a bunch of guns would have in his
  collection.  In
  Utopia park? The mystery deepens!
  
  Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry:
  
  Scorpio freezes, looking at his gun, and Callahan
  utters the most
  famous lines in the movie: I know what you're
  thinking. 'Did he fire
  six shots or only five?' Well, to tell you the
  truth, in all this
  excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as
  this is a .44
  Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and
  would blow your
  head clean off, you've got to ask yourself a
  question: 'Do I feel
  lucky?' Well, do ya, punk?
  
  
  (For detail nuts there is a 50 cal handgun now)
  
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
  lurkernomore20002000
  steve.sundur@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
  dhamiltony2k5 
   dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
   

Om, check with the Sherriff dept.?   They were
  serving a paper to 
someone on campus, knocked on the door and heard
  a gunshot go off 
inside.  They were glad that it was not pointed
  at them.  Instead 
   it was a self-inflicted 44 cal to the head.  

Yes with all the privacy rules now, it is
  interesting that no one 
   can 
comment on a public incident that did happened. 
  Speak the sweet 
truth?  

One of the Utopia Park employees was with the
  deputy when it 
happened.  Of course no names can be given so
  the deputies are 
   very careful in the recount but descriptive of
  something that 
   evidently happened this week.  Everyone is
  cautious on all sides for 
   different reasons of privacy.  

I was hoping someone like Sal who is more
  connected up here could 
come up with the name.  It is a sad story and
  would be nice to 
   know the name to lend support to anyone if needed.

   This nicely ties up all the loose ends with the
  Purusha person 
   dying at Utopia park, the suicide, except that
  none of it is 
   confirmed except by Doug.  Privacy rules when the
  police serve a 
   warrant and hear a gunshot?  Come on.  That ain't
  how it works.  
   This IS the stuff that makes the news.  Come clean
  Doug.
   
   lurk
   
  
  
  
  
  
  To subscribe, send a message to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Or go to: 
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
  and click 'Join This Group!' 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  


 Get your own web address.  
 Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
 http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread dhamiltony2k5
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Community?
 
 
 And now also in utopia Park on campus is someone else, a longterm 
 movement person who is passing away of some disease process.  No 
 money, no family, no primary care-giver, not able to hire anyone to 
 nurse him in the end.  
 

The needs got figured out by friends this week.  Bill Krist is in the 
final days with a brain tumor.  In spirit and character he is doing 
well with it.  Was moved to Parkview this week and is very fine with 
that.

-Doug



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread Richard J. Williams
TurquoiseB wrote:
 You may have convinced yourself that your 
 agenda is against liars and intellectually
 dishonest people, Judy, but I don't think
 you've fooled many others.

So, it's all about Judy.




[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread taskcentered
Judy, 

We didn't start the rumor, but did report. We picked up the news from
an anonymous submitter to the blog and then read Doug Hamilton's
posting on FFL.

We later retracted the story because we couldn't confirm it through
authorities.

We clearly made a mistake in publishing our post. We believed we had
two sources, but without names and details and official confirmation
we should not have posted the story.

It's a mistake we will not make again.

Our apologies to anyone disturbed by the publishing of an apparently
fictional event.

John M. Knapp, LMSW
http://tmfree.blogspot.com/



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Judy, 
 
 We didn't start the rumor, but did report. We picked up the news 
from
 an anonymous submitter to the blog and then read Doug Hamilton's
 posting on FFL.
 
 We later retracted the story because we couldn't confirm it through
 authorities.
 
 We clearly made a mistake in publishing our post. We believed we had
 two sources, but without names and details and official confirmation
 we should not have posted the story.
 
 It's a mistake we will not make again.

Tell us again about the time MMY was rumored
to be sending small groups of fanatical true
believers off to isolated camps in the jungle
to await the nuclear holocaust, John.




[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread taskcentered
That's a significant distortion of a post nearly 10 years ago.

You keep setting up straw dogs, Judy. I have little doubt you will be
able to knock them down.

John M. Knapp, LMSW
http://tmfree.blogspot.com/

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  Judy, 
  
  We didn't start the rumor, but did report. We picked up the news 
 from
  an anonymous submitter to the blog and then read Doug Hamilton's
  posting on FFL.
  
  We later retracted the story because we couldn't confirm it through
  authorities.
  
  We clearly made a mistake in publishing our post. We believed we had
  two sources, but without names and details and official confirmation
  we should not have posted the story.
  
  It's a mistake we will not make again.
 
 Tell us again about the time MMY was rumored
 to be sending small groups of fanatical true
 believers off to isolated camps in the jungle
 to await the nuclear holocaust, John.





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  Judy, 
  
  We didn't start the rumor, but did report. We picked up 
  the news from an anonymous submitter to the blog and then 
  read Doug Hamilton's posting on FFL.
  
  We later retracted the story because we couldn't confirm 
  it through authorities.
  
  We clearly made a mistake in publishing our post. We 
  believed we had two sources, but without names and details 
  and official confirmation we should not have posted the story.
  
  It's a mistake we will not make again.
 
 Tell us again about the time MMY was rumored
 to be sending small groups of fanatical true
 believers off to isolated camps in the jungle
 to await the nuclear holocaust, John.

In other words, John can admit to making a
mistake by posting his (seemingly false) rumor, 
but Judy cannot. Instead, when called on posting
a seemingly equally false rumor, she re-attacks, 
and redoubles her efforts to discredit John.

That said, Gina's post on TM-Free hardly con-
stitutes a retraction, John. It's a Judy-
style retraction, saying in essence, Ooops,
we may have screwed up by publishing this bad
stuff, but here is some *other* bad stuff you 
should know about the group we're dedicated 
to writing bad stuff about. To wit:


Follow Up on Rumored MUM Suicide January 2007

Posted by Gina at 1/20/2007 01:42:00 AM

My good friend in Fairfield checked with TM 
village criers. There is no word about a 
recent suicide on MUM campus.

She said they calmly responded, THAT one 
is just a rumor. They continued with their 
cafe' dinner. Suicides and other tragic 
stories of medical  financial neglect are 
common features of TM Organization life.

Then she offered, But do you want to know 
about our community suicides of the last 
year or two? .. one woman put her head in 
an oven, another man hanged himself in his 
basement, and someone jumped in front of a 
moving train. It's all so sad.


Hint: I think it's nice to claim that you
published a retraction, but other than
this post to FFL, I don't see one. So far
there have been two different stories pre-
sented here on FFL -- one claiming informa-
tion from the Sheriff's office that such an 
event did take place, and others suggest-
ing that it didn't. I suggest that we all
wait to see which is which and then those
who were mistaken can say so clearly, not
with a cheap-shot Yeah, I might have been 
wrong about that first smut I posted, but 
here's some more smut for you. 

That's a trick you *learned* from Judy, John.
If you don't want to be considered to be just
like her, you'll do a better job with your
next retraction, or avoid having to make one.

For a blog that claims to be 99 and 44/100ths
TM-free, that 56th of a percent is looking
more than a little obsessive.





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread nablusos108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Judy, 
 
 We didn't start the rumor, but did report. We picked up the news from
 an anonymous submitter to the blog and then read Doug Hamilton's
 posting on FFL.
 
 We later retracted the story because we couldn't confirm it through
 authorities.
 
 We clearly made a mistake in publishing our post. We believed we had
 two sources, but without names and details and official confirmation
 we should not have posted the story.
 
 It's a mistake we will not make again.

You will do anything to harm yourself, no ?




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Jan 20, 2007, at 1:03 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 Then she offered, But do you want to know
 about our community suicides of the last
 year or two? .. one woman put her head in
 an oven, another man hanged himself in his
 basement, and someone jumped in front of a
 moving train. It's all so sad.

I noticed that too, and couldn't believe that's what passes for 
credible information.  I think  what that is is a distillation of 
several TM suicides over a period of many years.  Don't know anything 
about the oven story, but I do think someone in the DC community hanged 
himself--a *long* time ago.  And I'm not sure about the train story, 
but I think that was also a long time ago here in FF--if at all.

The idea that any of these things could happen recently and nobody 
would have heard of them is idiocy.  Either that's a fake conversation, 
or the person doing the talking as well as the one doing the reporting 
needs to, I don't know--maybe get a life?

 Hint: I think it's nice to claim that you
 published a retraction, but other than
 this post to FFL, I don't see one. So far
 there have been two different stories pre-
 sented here on FFL -- one claiming informa-
 tion from the Sheriff's office that such an
 event did take place, and others suggest-
 ing that it didn't. I suggest that we all
 wait to see which is which and then those
 who were mistaken can say so clearly, not
 with a cheap-shot Yeah, I might have been
 wrong about that first smut I posted, but
 here's some more smut for you.

 That's a trick you *learned* from Judy, John.
 If you don't want to be considered to be just
 like her, you'll do a better job with your
 next retraction, or avoid having to make one.

 For a blog that claims to be 99 and 44/100ths
 TM-free, that 56th of a percent is looking
 more than a little obsessive.



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I agree. A .44 is a nasty canon. I like a .45. Keeps
 the heathens at bay. 9 mils are for the Pelosi crowd,
 tree-huggers and those that complain about global
 warming.

I pity the fool who finds himself on the receiving end of a 9mm
Hydra-Shok JHP.



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
[I wrote:]
  Tell us again about the time MMY was rumored
  to be sending small groups of fanatical true
  believers off to isolated camps in the jungle
  to await the nuclear holocaust, John.

 That's a significant distortion of a post nearly 10 years ago.

From one of your June 1996 posts to
alt.meditation.transcendental (emphases
added):

The Maharishi is SENDING SMALL GROUPS OF FANATICAL TRUE
BELIEVERS OFF INTO THE JUNGLE with a nebulous mission
and an apocalyptic vision. He's not saying if we're not
careful, something will  happen -- he's telling these 
people that war will break out at any minute. 

If there's one thing we've learned from Jonestown, Aum
Shinrikyo, Waco, Solar Temple, et al, is that doomsday
scenarios like this are absolute pressure cookers for
the true believers involved. 

No matter what the Maharishi's motives are -- he may be
pure as the driven snow for all I know -- I consider
this a *very* dangerous situation. 

I've received several reports of TMers selling homes,
breaking up families, and so forth to go wait out the
'biological war' due within weeks. 

Surely you can see that this is madness? 

I don't dismiss the very real dangers of biological wars
and genetic manipulation. I just don't confuse these
important issues with what appear to be the delusions of
a mad man leading blind followers into ISOLATED CAMPS TO
AWAIT A HOLOCAUST.

Remember, up until the moment that the massacre at Jonestown
took place, Jim Jones was considered a fine humanitarian --
perhaps at worst a little foolish. 

If you *knew* that Jonestown would happen, wouldn't you risk
raising a false alarm?

See the post on alt.meditation.transcendental:
http://tinyurl.com/24z37e

 You keep setting up straw dogs, Judy. I have little doubt
 you will be able to knock them down.

I didn't write the post, John, you did.  The only
thing I got wrong in my paraphrase was that it was
a *biological* rather than a *nuclear* holocaust
the fanatical TMers were to await in their isolated
camps in the jungle.  And, oh, yes, I misspoke when
I suggested you had said it was rumored.  Actually
you insisted it was very much for real.

Anybody who wants to see more of the same, much
of it even more hysterical than the above, can
check the thread Trancenet Alert on 
alt.meditation.transcendental.  Press releases
about the impending disaster were posted to at
least 10 newsgroups, including
alt.meditation.transcendental, alt.meditation,
alt.support.ex-cult, alt.journalism,
alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.perot, alt.politics, 
alt.politics.europe, alt.politics.greens,
and alt.politics.india.

Here's more, where Knapp quotes himself in one
of the pseudo-press releases about the same crisis:

John Knapp, editor of TranceNet, an Internet
publication critical of the Maharishi, commented,
This is a very dangerous signal. Cult leaders
frequently use  apocalyptic announcements to
'gather the faithful.' He pointed out that
similar announcements preceded mass deaths at
Jonestown, Waco, Aum Shinrikyo, and Solar Temple
and other tragedies

This is a frightening turn of events, said
John Knapp. Anybody who lived through Jonestown
and Aum can't fail to see the parallels. The
Maharishi is creating small isolated groups of
dedicated fanatics. Without contact with the
outside world, they're being charged to carry out
a mysterious apocalyptic vision. The Maharishi
has never before painted such a doomsday scenario
in my experience. It looks very bad. I hope that
the authorities and the media take this situation
very seriously so that a tragedy may be avoided. 

alt.meditation.transcendental:
http://tinyurl.com/2za6yb

What Knapp is referring to is one of MMY's
projects, which involved governor couples
setting up Maharishi Vedic Universities in
various places in the third world (cities,
not jungles) to teach the populace TM.

And yet another press release with instructions
for what to do during this crisis:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 
What You Can Safely Do During This Crisis

SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. -- June 11, 1996 

Help Avert Another Jonestown 

Spread the Word 

Distribute this press release to every 
Usenet group and email address you 
believe would have a sincere interest. 
(Please avoid unjustified spamming -- 
this will make us more enemies than 
friends on the Net.) 

Gather Information 

Call your local Maharishi Vedic 
University (TM center) and ask for 
details about the Maharishi Vedic 
University Project. Call the President's 
Office of Maharishi University of 
Management, 515.472.1187, and ask for 
information. Also, TranceNet will 
posting frequent bulletins during this 
crisis. 

Send Information to TranceNet 

Whatever verifiable information you 
gather, send to TranceNet, via email at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], via fax at 
707.996.5560, via snailmail or courier 
at TranceNet, 1034 First Street West, 
Sonoma, CA 95476. 

Call Friends and Loved Ones in the TM 
Movement 


[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 That's a significant distortion of a post nearly 10 years ago.

Just to follow up: That it was 10 years ago you
were screeching hysterically about fanatical TMers
being sent to isolated camps in the jungle to 
await the holocaust only makes my point for me:
You're doing now the same thing you were doing
then, trying to start rumors based on unconfirmed
information.  Why we should expect that suddenly
now you'd start being more careful about what you
post, I'm not sure.

And of course what I wrote wasn't a distortion
at all, as we can all see from the quotes in my
earlier post.  So you've just confirmed what I
said about your untrustworthiness.




[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  
   Judy, 
   
   We didn't start the rumor, but did report. We picked up 
   the news from an anonymous submitter to the blog and then 
   read Doug Hamilton's posting on FFL.
   
   We later retracted the story because we couldn't confirm 
   it through authorities.
   
   We clearly made a mistake in publishing our post. We 
   believed we had two sources, but without names and details 
   and official confirmation we should not have posted the story.
   
   It's a mistake we will not make again.
  
  Tell us again about the time MMY was rumored
  to be sending small groups of fanatical true
  believers off to isolated camps in the jungle
  to await the nuclear holocaust, John.
 
 In other words, John can admit to making a
 mistake by posting his (seemingly false) rumor, 
 but Judy cannot.

What on earth makes you think we should trust
John's story about having heard the rumor from
somebody else?

In any case, as you know, my comment had to do
with his never again claim.  He's been doing
this kind of thing for well over 10 years; why
should we assume he's suddenly going to stop now?





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ 
  wrote:
  
   
   On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:59 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:
Why doesn't anyone ever name names on this site. Who is dying and
who shot themselves?
   
   M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any suicides?  I 
   haven't, and there hasn't been anything in the papers either.   
  Would 
   definitely be front-page news in a town this size.
  
  I think this rumor may have been started by
  Knapp on his blog:
  
  Sad News: Possible MUM Suicide
   
  Posted by John M. Knapp, LMSW at 1/19/2007 10:36:00 AM 
 
 Doug's post to FFL containing the rumor is dated earlier than that
 blog entry:
 

 Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:42 am
 
 I'm more inclined to believe he reposted on his blog the rumor he read
 on FFL.


Rumors from FFL. Now THERE is a reliable source of information...



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any 
suicides?  I haven't, and there hasn't been anything 
in the papers either. Would definitely be front-page 
news in a town this size.
   
   I think this rumor may have been started by
   Knapp on his blog:
   
   Sad News: Possible MUM Suicide

   Posted by John M. Knapp, LMSW at 1/19/2007 10:36:00 AM 
  
  Doug's post to FFL containing the rumor is dated earlier 
  than that blog entry:
  
  Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:42 am
  
  I'm more inclined to believe he reposted on his blog the 
  rumor he read on FFL.
 
 I noticed this, too, just as I did my research
 after reading the first mention of the rumor 
 here by searching the online version of the 
 Fairfield Ledger. I couldn't find anything there 
 or on Google or in any of the neighboring Iowa 
 papers, so I chalked it up as a rumor, and didn't 
 bother to comment on it here. Especially because 
 a few others had already done so, asking for 
 validation of the rumor.
 
 Compare and contrast to (what appears to be) John
 Knapp reading the rumor here, wanting to believe
 it were true and thus *not* doing his research, 
 and printing it on his blog as truth.
 
 Also compare and contrast to one person here,
 reading John Knapp's blog and finding his version 
 of the rumor, wanting to believe it was the source
 and thus *not* doing her research by checking the 
 timestamps, and starting her own rumor that John 
 was the original source of the first rumor.
 
 It seems to me that in both of those cases what
 is going on is a person who 1) has an agenda,
 and 2) is willing to forward or start rumors
 that *further* that agenda, without bothering
 to verify their validity.
 
 Fanatics against, fanatics for. Same modus
 operandi.


Eh. If you're talking about me, I never noticed the time-stamps or I would have 
said 
something. 




[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
 dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
 
  Community?
  
  I understand that someone committed suicide on campus the other 
 day, 
  shooting themselves in the head.
 
 Om, check with the Sherriff dept.?   They were serving a paper to 
 someone on campus, knocked on the door and heard a gunshot go off 
 inside.  They were glad that it was not pointed at them.  Instead it 
 was a self-inflicted 44 cal to the head.  
 
 Yes with all the privacy rules now, it is interesting that no one can 
 comment on a public incident that did happened.  Speak the sweet 
 truth?  
 
 One of the Utopia Park employees was with the deputy when it 
 happened.  Of course no names can be given so the deputies are very 
 careful in the recount but descriptive of something that evidently 
 happened this week.  Everyone is cautious on all sides for different 
 reasons of privacy.  
 
 I was hoping someone like Sal who is more connected up here could 
 come up with the name.  It is a sad story and would be nice to know 
 the name to lend support to anyone if needed.
 
 -Doug in FF


A death can be reported. A suicide can also be reported. Are you sure it wasn't 
merely a 
self-inflicted injury, which can often be accidental (not that gunshot deaths 
aren't often 
accidental as well).



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I agree. A .44 is a nasty canon. I like a .45. Keeps
 the heathens at bay. 9 mils are for the Pelosi crowd,
 tree-huggers and those that complain about global
 warming.

Bah. GIve me the handgun developed to handle the Visiters in Alien Nation any 
day...



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
 M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any 
 suicides?  I haven't, and there hasn't been anything 
 in the papers either. Would definitely be front-page 
 news in a town this size.

I think this rumor may have been started by
Knapp on his blog:

Sad News: Possible MUM Suicide
 
Posted by John M. Knapp, LMSW at 1/19/2007 10:36:00 AM 
   
   Doug's post to FFL containing the rumor is dated earlier 
   than that blog entry:
   
   Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:42 am
   
   I'm more inclined to believe he reposted on his blog the 
   rumor he read on FFL.
  
  I noticed this, too, just as I did my research
  after reading the first mention of the rumor 
  here by searching the online version of the 
  Fairfield Ledger. I couldn't find anything there 
  or on Google or in any of the neighboring Iowa 
  papers, so I chalked it up as a rumor, and didn't 
  bother to comment on it here. Especially because 
  a few others had already done so, asking for 
  validation of the rumor.
  
  Compare and contrast to (what appears to be) John
  Knapp reading the rumor here, wanting to believe
  it were true and thus *not* doing his research, 
  and printing it on his blog as truth.
  
  Also compare and contrast to one person here,
  reading John Knapp's blog and finding his version 
  of the rumor, wanting to believe it was the source
  and thus *not* doing her research by checking the 
  timestamps, and starting her own rumor that John 
  was the original source of the first rumor.
  
  It seems to me that in both of those cases what
  is going on is a person who 1) has an agenda,
  and 2) is willing to forward or start rumors
  that *further* that agenda, without bothering
  to verify their validity.
  
  Fanatics against, fanatics for. Same modus
  operandi.
 
 
 Eh. If you're talking about me, I never noticed the
 time-stamps or I would have said something.

I don't think Barry believes you're a girl, Lawson.

Although with Barry, you never know...




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread Vaj


On Jan 19, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:



On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:59 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:

Why doesn't anyone ever name names on this site. Who is dying and

who shot themselves?


M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any suicides?  I
haven't, and there hasn't been anything in the papers either.   Would
definitely be front-page news in a town this size.


That's because they're just *unstressing* -- it's just the nervous  
system purifying! In a Vedic city, these things are normal.

[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-20 Thread dhamiltony2k5
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Community?
 
.  
 
 Does the movement have no care program for its old?  
 
 
 sympathetic care given to their own in the last days.   
Is the TMorg 
of Maharishi too consumed with fund-raising and building utopias to 
 care about its people?
 
 
 -Doug in FF



Thanks Mark, this answers my question.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Notables in the tmo tend to have money which helps in that situation.
The problem is with purushas and MDs (and other full timer staff)
who get kicked off if diagnosed with a disease and they have little to
no money and are generally estranged from their families - their
spiritual group was their family but that's taken from them when they
get sick which is the time they need that kind of support. OFten they
still have ideas about ayurved or yagyas curing them which motivates
them to make foolish treatment choices. PLus they're out in the world
maybe for the first time in decades which would be difficult enough
for them even without being sick. This has created a very difficult
situation for many people and it's only going to increase in frequency
as the baby boomers in the tmo approach their 60s.





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-19 Thread lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Somehow I would bet that if there were old people in the Ammachi 
 movement or several other spiritual movements that there would be 
 sympathetic care given to their own in the last days. 

Not sure about this. Has this task ever been a part of spiritual 
groups except some religious entities?

  Is the TMorg of Maharishi too consumed with fund-raising and 
building utopias to care about its people?

This latest deal - how can the TB's buy into it?

lurk
 
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-19 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Jan 19, 2007, at 5:42 AM, dhamiltony2k5 wrote:
 
  I understand that someone committed suicide on campus the other day,
  shooting themselves in the head.
 
  And now also in utopia Park on campus is someone else, a longterm
  movement person who is passing away of some disease process.  No
  money, no family, no primary care-giver, not able to hire anyone to
  nurse him in the end.
 
 Well, who are these people, Doug?  I hadn't heard about either of them, 
 not that I'm exactly in the know.  But I would think the former at 
 least would have made local news.

John Knapp is starting up his website again (Kudos to the rivalmeditation 
school that did 
the public service to keep the archives available for so long...), so I'm 
sure he will have all 
the skinny on everything evil in the TMO before long...

 
  A guy who has been on the Purusha program for years with the
  movement, come here to FF to die.
 
  Does the movement have no care program for its old?
 
  Somehow I would bet that if there were old people in the Ammachi
  movement or several other spiritual movements that there would be
  sympathetic care given to their own in the last days.   Is the TMorg
  of Maharishi too consumed with fund-raising and building utopias to
  care about its people?
 
 Well, yeah, and has been for quite a while now.
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-19 Thread m2smart4u2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ 
wrote:
 
  On Jan 19, 2007, at 5:42 AM, dhamiltony2k5 wrote:
  
   I understand that someone committed suicide on campus the 
other day,
   shooting themselves in the head.
  
   And now also in utopia Park on campus is someone else, a 
longterm
   movement person who is passing away of some disease process.  
No
   money, no family, no primary care-giver, not able to hire 
anyone to
   nurse him in the end.
  
  Well, who are these people, Doug?  I hadn't heard about either 
of them, 
  not that I'm exactly in the know.  But I would think the former 
at 
  least would have made local news.
 
 John Knapp is starting up his website again (Kudos to the 
rivalmeditation school that did 
 the public service to keep the archives available for so 
long...), so I'm sure he will have all 
 the skinny on everything evil in the TMO before long...
 
  
   A guy who has been on the Purusha program for years with the
   movement, come here to FF to die.
  
   Does the movement have no care program for its old?
  
   Somehow I would bet that if there were old people in the 
Ammachi
   movement or several other spiritual movements that there would 
be
   sympathetic care given to their own in the last days.   Is the 
TMorg
   of Maharishi too consumed with fund-raising and building 
utopias to
   care about its people?
  
  Well, yeah, and has been for quite a while now.
  
 
Why doesn't anyone ever name names on this site. Who is dying and 
who shot themselves?




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-19 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:59 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:
 Why doesn't anyone ever name names on this site. Who is dying and
 who shot themselves?

M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any suicides?  I 
haven't, and there hasn't been anything in the papers either.   Would 
definitely be front-page news in a town this size.

Sal



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-19 Thread m2smart4u2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:59 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:
  Why doesn't anyone ever name names on this site. Who is dying and
  who shot themselves?
 
 M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any suicides?  I 
 haven't, and there hasn't been anything in the papers either.   
Would 
 definitely be front-page news in a town this size.
 
 Sal
No, I'm in Oregon and read the FF Ledger online. I think I'll check 
the obituaries since no one is willing to say. It is odd to me that 
everyone talks about stuff but never uses names ARG




[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-19 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:59 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:
  Why doesn't anyone ever name names on this site. Who is dying and
  who shot themselves?
 
 M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any suicides?  I 
 haven't, and there hasn't been anything in the papers either.   
Would 
 definitely be front-page news in a town this size.

I think this rumor may have been started by
Knapp on his blog:

Sad News: Possible MUM Suicide
 
Posted by John M. Knapp, LMSW at 1/19/2007 10:36:00 AM 

We have received a report this morning that a Maharishi University of 
Management recently committed suicide by a shot to the head. We hope 
to confirm this report this morning. We express condolences to the 
family and friends of the deceased.




[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-19 Thread m2smart4u2000
snip
OK Doug H, you were the original poster. Who is dying and who 
committed suicide?



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-19 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ 
 wrote:
 
  
  On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:59 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:
   Why doesn't anyone ever name names on this site. Who is dying 
and
   who shot themselves?
  
  M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any suicides?  
I 
  haven't, and there hasn't been anything in the papers either.   
 Would 
  definitely be front-page news in a town this size.
 
 I think this rumor may have been started by
 Knapp on his blog:
 
 Sad News: Possible MUM Suicide
  
 Posted by John M. Knapp, LMSW at 1/19/2007 10:36:00 AM 
 
 We have received a report this morning that a Maharishi
 University of Management recently committed suicide

That's [sic], BTW.

 by a shot to the head. We hope to confirm this report
 this morning.

Not confirmed yet.

 We express condolences to the 
 family and friends of the deceased.

Whether there is one or not...




[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-19 Thread Robert Gimbel
 I just called the hospital in Fairfield, and although they are not 
permitted to give out information on such things;
 It appeared from the initial conversation with the nurse there;
There have been no reported suicides this past week in the FF area.
Also, checked Google-news, and there is not a report on this.
This could be a very nasty type of rumor, to say the least.
Suicide is never a good option, and for anyone to start such a rumor is 
abominable act.
R.G.



[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO community?

2007-01-19 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ 
 wrote:
 
  
  On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:59 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:
   Why doesn't anyone ever name names on this site. Who is dying and
   who shot themselves?
  
  M2, you're on campus, right?  Heard anything about any suicides?  I 
  haven't, and there hasn't been anything in the papers either.   
 Would 
  definitely be front-page news in a town this size.
 
 I think this rumor may have been started by
 Knapp on his blog:
 
 Sad News: Possible MUM Suicide
  
 Posted by John M. Knapp, LMSW at 1/19/2007 10:36:00 AM 
 
 We have received a report this morning that a Maharishi University of 
 Management recently committed suicide by a shot to the head. We hope 
 to confirm this report this morning. We express condolences to the 
 family and friends of the deceased.


Anyone else get visions of a scaley amphibian reptile weeping?