[FairfieldLife] Re: Train Noise in Fairfield

2006-08-20 Thread Dick Mays
Title: Re: Train Noise in Fairfield




Bill, I'm for a solution.
Dick


From: Bill Blackmore
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 08/11/06 16:41:32
To:
Undisclosed-Recipient:,@franklin.lisco.com
Subject: Train Noise in Fairfield

Dear Friends,
I hope you will not mind me emailing
you about an issue that I think needs to be revisited by our City
Council. If this does not interest you, simply do not respond or
let me know and I'll make sure you don't get anymore emails from me
about this matter. I am sending this to friends and
acquaintances that I believe either live or work near the tracks or
are likely to support a better and quieter quality of life near the
train tracks. 

I want to give you the short history
of the recent debate about train noise in Fairfield. (This is
100% about the train whistles or horns, not the train and train tracks
themselves). I think this will be useful, since I didn't know
this myself until Mayor Malloy filled me in recently. A couple
of years ago (give or take a little) some local residents asked the
City Council to consider a solution that would have allowed trains to
pass through Ff. without honking. There was quite a debate,
letters to the Editor, etc., and in the final analysis the Council
members decided based on the feedback that they got that the community
was opposed to implementing a solution of this sort. The figure
I heard was that calls against a solution ran 5-1 to those in favor.
I have been told in no uncertain terms that because of this, the
issue cannot be successfully raised again with the current Council.


So what is the point here? I
don't know this for sure, but I am quite convinced that our Council
members did not get all that many calls, although I am sure they got
more against than for. My guess is that those of us who pay more
attention to quality of life issues simply got outhustled by someone
with a town vs. gown axe to grind. Somebody
organized some like-minded individuals, and they made a lot of calls,
and the other side didn't. End of story. 

Personally, I do not believe that
this issue is so lopsided. Also, now that our Civic Center is
under construction in close proximity to the tracks and slated to open
late next year, there is another basis on which to raise the issue of
the train noise. I don't like seeing something that I have
wanted to see happen for the entire time I have lived in Ff. get
shelved, especially since it was not going to cost taxpayers a dime.
(I believe this is correct, but am in the process of verifying
for sure). 

What am I asking you to do?
Right now its very simple. I am making an email list of
residents of Ff. who want to see the train whistles silenced once and
for all. To put your name on this list, simply send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (quiet trains). If you know anyone who you
think would support an initiative of this sort, please forward this
email to them so they can opt in if they want to do so. Once
this list reaches critical mass, we will unleash a campaign of letters
and emails to our City Council members to convince them that the time
has come for the train whistles to be silenced. I don't think
this will happen in the next month or so, as timing is critical.
I am finding out what sort of call volume the Council members
got last time around, so we will have a basis on which to guage the
level of support required. 

Thanks for your time and attention.
Regards, Bill Blackmore 

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: Train Noise in Fairfield

2006-08-19 Thread uns_tressor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
 j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:

   On a few evenings a while back, I teleconferenced into 
   the Wednesday satsang that Tom Traynor hosted. I 
   couldn't hear what most of the people in the room 
   were saying, but when a train passed outside, I could 
   hear the long-long-short-long blast that trains give 
   as they approach crossings.

Train noise, in general can be serious, and if they are
electric, the EMF voltages are an issue.

Recently, in London, someone did a study of children's
school performance using kids from a particular tower
block. They discovered that all the kids on the side 
nearest the tracks had consistenly lower performance
than those on the side away from the rails. This puzzled
them since sleep problems did not seem to be an issue.

They ran various tests, and discovered that the children 
on the train side had the ability to switch off sound at
will. They did not know it, but they could. They simply 
did not hear sounds that they did not like. The researchers
then discovered that these kids could, and did switch off
the sound of the teacher's voice when they were bored with 
the class.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Train Noise in Fairfield

2006-08-18 Thread Patrick Gillam
 From: Bill Blackmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:41:28 -0500
 
 A couple
 of years ago (give or take a little) some local residents asked the City
 Council to consider a solution that would have allowed trains to pass
 through Ff. without honking.  

On a few evenings a while back, I teleconferenced into 
the Wednesday satsang that Tom Traynor hosted. I 
couldn't hear what most of the people in the room 
were saying, but when a train passed outside, I could 
hear the long-long-short-long blast that trains give 
as they approach crossings. That sound cue put me 
in Fairfield as nothing else could. The call was worth 
it, just for that.

As far as Bill Blackmore's proposal goes, seems to me 
it would put lives at risk. This may be one of those 
instances where majority rule can't apply, if indeed 
the majority feels this way.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Train Noise in Fairfield

2006-08-18 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

  From: Bill Blackmore bblackmore@
  Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:41:28 -0500
  
  A couple
  of years ago (give or take a little) some local residents asked
the City
  Council to consider a solution that would have allowed trains to pass
  through Ff. without honking.  
 
 On a few evenings a while back, I teleconferenced into 
 the Wednesday satsang that Tom Traynor hosted. I 
 couldn't hear what most of the people in the room 
 were saying, but when a train passed outside, I could 
 hear the long-long-short-long blast that trains give 
 as they approach crossings. That sound cue put me 
 in Fairfield as nothing else could. The call was worth 
 it, just for that.
 
 As far as Bill Blackmore's proposal goes, seems to me 
 it would put lives at risk. This may be one of those 
 instances where majority rule can't apply, if indeed 
 the majority feels this way.

My recollection from the last time this issue came up is that horn
blowing is on a crossing by crossing basis and that in order for a
crossing to be horn-free, it either has to be permanently closed or
have double gates installed so that vehicles can't drive around the
gate and over the tracks.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Train Noise in Fairfield

2006-08-18 Thread bob_brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@
 wrote:
 
   From: Bill Blackmore bblackmore@
   Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:41:28 -0500
   
   A couple
   of years ago (give or take a little) some local residents asked
 the City
   Council to consider a solution that would have allowed trains 
to pass
   through Ff. without honking.  
  
  On a few evenings a while back, I teleconferenced into 
  the Wednesday satsang that Tom Traynor hosted. I 
  couldn't hear what most of the people in the room 
  were saying, but when a train passed outside, I could 
  hear the long-long-short-long blast that trains give 
  as they approach crossings. That sound cue put me 
  in Fairfield as nothing else could. The call was worth 
  it, just for that.
  
  As far as Bill Blackmore's proposal goes, seems to me 
  it would put lives at risk. This may be one of those 
  instances where majority rule can't apply, if indeed 
  the majority feels this way.
 


 My recollection from the last time this issue came up is that horn
 blowing is on a crossing by crossing basis and that in order for a
 crossing to be horn-free, it either has to be permanently closed or
 have double gates installed so that vehicles can't drive around the
 gate and over the tracks.



**

City council nixes quiet zone by 5-2 vote 
By Erik Gable, Ledger assistant news editor06/15/2004
Email to a friendPost a CommentPrinter-friendly
  The Fairfield City Council voted Monday night not to pursue 
the possibility of declaring Fairfield a quiet zone where train 
whistles would only be allowed to blow in emergencies.

 
  Citing the cost and inconvenience of closing some of 
Fairfield's crossings, which would be necessary in order to improve 
Fairfield's safety rating to the point where the Federal Railroad 
Administration would allow a quiet zone, the council's public safety 
committee recommended against pursuing the matter further.


  Councilman John Revolinski said the obstacles were not as 
insurmountable as the public safety committee made them out to be, 
and said some of the information presented at past council meetings 
as reasons not to pursue a quiet zone turned out to be inaccurate.


  The final vote was 5-2 to drop all further discussion of the 
train whistles, with Revolinski and councilwoman Christy Welty 
dissenting.


  The Federal Railroad Administration had presented Fairfield 
with two options for creating a quiet zone. Both options involved 
closing Eighth, Third and Court streets. The first option, which had 
an initial estimated cost of $103,338, also called for raised 
medians on five streets. The other, with an initial estimated cost 
of $33,785, called for raised medians on two streets and one-way 
traffic on Ninth, Main and B streets.


  Councilwoman Connie Boyer said about 60 percent of the phone 
calls she received about the issue were from people in favor of 
keeping the train whistle. Welty said the phone calls she received 
were 5-to-1 in favor of eliminating the whistle.


  Councilwoman Pauline Reeder, who chairs the public safety 
committee, said closing crossings would inconvenience people and 
interfere with the city's attempts to figure out the best way to 
have traffic flow through town. The tracks are crossed at Court 
Street an estimated 600 times per day, at Eighth Street about 400 
times per day and at Third Street about 350 times per day.


  You're changing people's lifestyles by telling them they 
can't go on Court Street, Reeder said.


  It does change people's lifestyle, and it also changes their 
lifestyle not to get woken up in the middle of the night by the 
train horns, Revolinski responded.


  For a complete story, read Tuesday's Fairfield Ledger. 












To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Train Noise in Fairfield

2006-08-18 Thread Sal Sunshine
Typical roo cry-babies.  Maybe if they got off their butts and did some 
honest work for a change, they wouldn't have so much trouble sleeping 
at night.

Sal

On Aug 18, 2006, at 10:27 PM, bob_brigante wrote:


   You're changing people's lifestyles by telling them they
 can't go on Court Street, Reeder said.


   It does change people's lifestyle, and it also changes their 
 lifestyle not to get woken up in the middle of the night by the train 
 horns, Revolinski responded.



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/