[FairfieldLife] Re: Wind turbines could .. and the Planet Niroba
grate.swan no_re...@... wrote: This is an interesting and entertaining book -- from first glance. But my impression of such books is that they were written by a group from the last Star Trek convention. As for Chapter 15, I think you may be right. It does seem a bit far fetched. As for the rest, its a bit like TM. There is no need to believe anything. Do it and you will see. Build a Bedini SG. Build a Charles Flynn. As for VC firms, they are as narrow minded as it is possible to get. They will never get involved. They are brain dead. Yes, Grate Swan, why don't YOU build one?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Wind turbines could .. and the Planet Niroba
Nelson nelsonriddle2...@... wrote: There are a number of off grid electrical systems operating here in Fairfield. It is nice to notice the announcement of an increase in electrical rates in the paper and realize it is irrelevant. Irrelevant? Oh, no. As their rates go up, so too do the rates at which you sell your surplus back to them. You increase your feed-in tarriff.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Wind turbines could .. and the Planet Niroba
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor uns_tres...@... wrote: Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ wrote: There are a number of off grid electrical systems operating here in Fairfield. It is nice to notice the announcement of an increase in electrical rates in the paper and realize it is irrelevant. Irrelevant? Oh, no. As their rates go up, so too do the rates at which you sell your surplus back to them. You increase your feed-in tarriff. Not being connected to the grid, I don't have that problem.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Wind turbines could .. and the Planet Niroba
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor uns_tres...@... wrote: ...that they are already old hat. This free ebook (1800 pages) can provide all that is required whether the wind blows or not: http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk This is an interesting and entertaining book -- from first glance. But my impression of such books is that they were written by a group from the last Star Trek convention who found and edited a secret manuscript of a MIT grad student on acid -- dumped in the alley way as the student was being hauled off to Bellvue. Take the 15th chapter. The premise is that a huge brown dwarf (Niroba) with 5 orbiting planets, passes by our solar system every 3600 years, in past cycles caused the oceans to rise up, revealing the ocean floor, created Noah's flood, and currently is the total cause of global warming (and that CO2 has absolutely nothing to do with it). When the author spouts such, it tends to enhance my first premise, above. And there is a s*load of venture capital money for new energy technology -- if Chapters 1-14 had any economic viability, the VCs would be knocking their doors down to get a piece of the action. And it would be getting serious finding form DOE, EPA and university labs. Nada. Thus my first premise. Not a challenge, but a friendly reuest, do you have any cites that indicates the economic viability of any of these things -- and serious scientific / technology work being done using them? (and admittedly I did not read the whole thing) Look out for Charles Flynn, Tesla Switch, Robert Adams, Bob Boyce. And Takahashi here: http://www.cheniere.org/misc/wankel.htm Uns.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Wind turbines could .. and the Planet Niroba
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor uns_tressor@ wrote: ...that they are already old hat. This free ebook (1800 pages) can provide all that is required whether the wind blows or not: http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk This is an interesting and entertaining book -- from first glance. But my impression of such books is that they were written by a group from the last Star Trek convention who found and edited a secret manuscript of a MIT grad student on acid -- dumped in the alley way as the student was being hauled off to Bellvue. Take the 15th chapter. The premise is that a huge brown dwarf (Niroba) with 5 orbiting planets, passes by our solar system every 3600 years, in past cycles caused the oceans to rise up, revealing the ocean floor, created Noah's flood, and currently is the total cause of global warming (and that CO2 has absolutely nothing to do with it). When the author spouts such, it tends to enhance my first premise, above. And there is a s*load of venture capital money for new energy technology -- if Chapters 1-14 had any economic viability, the VCs would be knocking their doors down to get a piece of the action. And it would be getting serious finding form DOE, EPA and university labs. Nada. Thus my first premise. Not a challenge, but a friendly reuest, do you have any cites that indicates the economic viability of any of these things -- and serious scientific / technology work being done using them? (and admittedly I did not read the whole thing) snip, There are a number of off grid electrical systems operating here in Fairfield. It is nice to notice the announcement of an increase in electrical rates in the paper and realize it is irrelevant.