Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: delightful but not for prudes

2014-03-26 Thread LEnglish5 
Actually, now I think on it, everyone had two balloons and it was a guy (or 
two) offstage that were reaching out and popping the balloons as teh dancers 
spun.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: delightful but not for prudes

2014-03-26 Thread LEnglish5 
My favorite variations are the fight scene with Jackie Chan where he has run 
nude from a Turkish bathhouse and gets into a fight with a bunch of guys in a 
Turkish street occupied by a large number spice merchants. After he lost his 
towel during the fight, the only way he had to maintain his modesty was to 
continually grab a new random pan of merchandise from one of the spice booths 
between exchanges of punches/kicks (OUCH! that stuff burns...). 

 The other is a line-dance version I saw on the British TV show, OTT, where 
about 6 or 8 nude young men had 2 balloons each, except the guys at the end, 
who had one balloon and one pin.
 

 Spin, spin  adjust position of balloons, spin, spin,  adjust 
position of balloons, spin spin ,,, guys are starting to look a little 
nervous... spin, spin ...

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: delightful but not for prudes

2014-03-26 Thread Share Long 
Steve, I know what you mean. There's something universal about it. Especially 
for the spring time (-:





On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 7:05 AM, "steve.sun...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
That was great Share.  I don't know why this popped into my head, but this was 
a gag that could have been done 2000 years ago, or 5000 years ago, just as 
effectively.  I guess there are many things like that.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

[FairfieldLife] Re: delightful but not for prudes

2014-03-26 Thread steve.sundur 
That was great Share.  I don't know why this popped into my head, but this was 
a gag that could have been done 2000 years ago, or 5000 years ago, just as 
effectively.  I guess there are many things like that.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :