Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Anyone Tried Yogic Flying?

2010-02-12 Thread It's just a ride
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Vaj  wrote:

>
>
> It's been known for hundreds, maybe thousands of years, that if you do a
> fast, bastrika pranayama, it causes a hopping phenomenon known in Sanskrit
> "frog-hopping". It's not associated with levitation-as-a-spiritual practice.
>
>
>
I think it's purely coincidental that some "flyers" go into very loud, very
powerful rapid hyperventilation before taking off.

I vary rarely do any hyperventilation.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Anyone Tried Yogic Flying?

2010-02-12 Thread Vaj


On Feb 12, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Hugo wrote:


I have to say my first experience was pretty amazing but
it never repeated itself despite years spent doing long
progs. I think it's tricky to judge for ourselves whether
it's hypnosis/suggestion or something "real" and spontaneous.
I think people make very bad witnesses, especially to
something they believe in. We can kid ourselves so easily,
especially when in a strong belief system like the TMO.
The things they teach about consciousness seem bizarre to
me now but were so plausible at the time.



It's been known for hundreds, maybe thousands of years, that if you  
do a fast, bastrika pranayama, it causes a hopping phenomenon known  
in Sanskrit "frog-hopping". It's not associated with levitation-as-a- 
spiritual practice.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Anyone Tried Yogic Flying?

2010-02-12 Thread Vaj


On Feb 12, 2010, at 11:10 AM, It's just a ride wrote:


On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Vaj  wrote:



If some sort of actual anti-gravity effect was going on, the sidhas  
would not follow the standard parabolic arc seem in TM sidhas and  
common in any trajectory where the body is not acted on by some  
other force other than gravity (e.g. wind). It's just very basic  
physics.


Therefore it's easy to conclude to sidha's "hops" are due to some  
sort of muscle jerking. Height and length of trajectory also seems  
to correlate with physical fitness and athletic prowess, i.e.  
gymnasts tend to be "better" yogic hoppers.


So in other words, it's a scam preying on people with weak powers  
of discrimination.



I've been in flying rooms for a couple decades. Every year or two I  
decide to take a look at other "flyers".  I look at the "flyers'"  
muscular effort then I look at the trajectory they follow.  I've  
developed a pretty good sense of how much power it takes to get,  
say, a ball in the air and the path it takes.  Y'all have developed  
this judgement as well.  I get very worried when it comes to me  
that these people aren't even doing yogic hopping.  They are  
twitching, cooperatively moving the legs and arms to facilitate  
"lift off", and following the path one would take in their air from  
the amount of physical effort they exerted.  I also examine my own  
"hopping".  It's very evident that there is no levitation  
involved.  If I hold my muscles very taut, I won't get a micron off  
the foam.  After this, it takes a few weeks to forget what I've re- 
discovered and become innocent once again with yogic "flying".  All  
I can say is that when one performs the sutra, there is at the  
beginning stage of practice a very strong desire to hop.  Maybe  
that's step 0.01 of yogic flying.



Actual yogic fliers in the Himalaya jump straight up as their  
training progresses. It typically requires about 8 feet of movement,  
which would be physically impossible.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Anyone Tried Yogic Flying?

2010-02-12 Thread It's just a ride
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Vaj  wrote:

>
>
> If some sort of actual anti-gravity effect was going on, the sidhas would
> *not* follow the standard parabolic arc seem in TM sidhas and common in
> any trajectory where the body is not acted on by some other force other than
> gravity (e.g. wind). It's just very basic physics.
>
> Therefore it's easy to conclude to sidha's "hops" are due to some sort of
> muscle jerking. Height and length of trajectory also seems to correlate with
> physical fitness and athletic prowess, i.e. gymnasts tend to be "better"
> yogic hoppers.
>
> So in other words, it's a scam preying on people with weak powers of
> discrimination.
>
>
I've been in flying rooms for a couple decades. Every year or two I decide
to take a look at other "flyers".  I look at the "flyers'" muscular effort
then I look at the trajectory they follow.  I've developed a pretty good
sense of how much power it takes to get, say, a ball in the air and the path
it takes.  Y'all have developed this judgement as well.  I get very worried
when it comes to me that these people aren't even doing yogic hopping.  They
are twitching, cooperatively moving the legs and arms to facilitate "lift
off", and following the path one would take in their air from the amount of
physical effort they exerted.  I also examine my own "hopping".  It's very
evident that there is no levitation involved.  If I hold my muscles very
taut, I won't get a micron off the foam.  After this, it takes a few weeks
to forget what I've re-discovered and become innocent once again with yogic
"flying".  All I can say is that when one performs the sutra, there is at
the beginning stage of practice a very strong desire to hop.  Maybe that's
step 0.01 of yogic flying.


-- 
"I have outlived my pecker."  -- Willie Nelson


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Anyone Tried Yogic Flying?

2010-02-12 Thread Vaj


On Feb 12, 2010, at 4:27 AM, Hugo wrote:


But the hopping is supposed to be due to this controlling
of natural laws. God knows why, it's not like we are going
to jump in the air and stay there. Someone once asked Marshy
whether this would be how levitation happened and he said
that we would waft lightly into the air then float back down.



If some sort of actual anti-gravity effect was going on, the sidhas  
would not follow the standard parabolic arc seem in TM sidhas and  
common in any trajectory where the body is not acted on by some other  
force other than gravity (e.g. wind). It's just very basic physics.


Therefore it's easy to conclude to sidha's "hops" are due to some  
sort of muscle jerking. Height and length of trajectory also seems to  
correlate with physical fitness and athletic prowess, i.e. gymnasts  
tend to be "better" yogic hoppers.


So in other words, it's a scam preying on people with weak powers of  
discrimination.

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Anyone Tried Yogic Flying?

2010-02-10 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Duveyoung
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 3:11 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Anyone Tried Yogic Flying?
 
  
Wayback,

I'm thinkin ya might like BuddhaAtTheGasPump. Yer dripping with sincerity.

Edg
That's http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BuddhaAtTheGasPump


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Anyone Tried Yogic Flying?

2010-02-10 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:49 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

> Looks like a case for THE CORRECTOR.
> 
> Will she come running in to defend the poor sod 
> taken to the verbal cleaners by Edg,

Cue up the music from The Charge of the
Light Brigade in the background...

> or is that
> only something she does for those abused by her 
> arch-nemesis?
> 
> Curious minds want to know...  :-)



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Anyone Tried Yogic Flying?

2010-02-10 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Feb 10, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Vaj wrote:

> On Feb 10, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Duveyoung wrote:
> 
>> And, hey, especially to do so here where this effrontery has been 
>> deconstructed endlessly -- do you know that 99% of the readers here think 
>> you're mentally ill, Ghanesh? Well, not mentally ill, because we're all 
>> civilized enough not to laugh at the truly ill,
> 
> 
> Are you kidding? What about Judy?

Judy?  Are *you*kidding, Vaj??
What about EDG? 

> Many FFL readers live to watch Curtis lead Judy around on a leash, like a 
> demented poodle who resists proper training. Judy is FFL's poster child for 
> the TM-Sidhi!



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Anyone Tried Yogic Flying?

2010-02-10 Thread Vaj


On Feb 10, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Duveyoung wrote:

And, hey, especially to do so here where this effrontery has been  
deconstructed endlessly -- do you know that 99% of the readers here  
think you're mentally ill, Ghanesh? Well, not mentally ill, because  
we're all civilized enough not to laugh at the truly ill,



Are you kidding? What about Judy? Many FFL readers live to watch  
Curtis lead Judy around on a leash, like a demented poodle who  
resists proper training. Judy is FFL's poster child for the TM-Sidhi!