RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 10 Ways Liars Use Words To Obscure the Truth

2013-11-29 Thread authfriend
Xeno wrote:
 
> As for authfriend, she said she would not have any discussions with me until 
> I apologised for 
 > some slight to her phony authenticity, and she has tried to worm out of that 
 > by entering into 
 > a thread I have started or entered myself by 'making a comment' and 
 > proclaiming that to not 
 > be entering a discussion. But of course that is exactly how you enter a 
 > discussion, by making 
 > a comment.
 

 If anybody ever thought Xeno had any integrity, the above should change their 
minds.
 

 



RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 10 Ways Liars Use Words To Obscure the Truth

2013-11-29 Thread authfriend
To be a little more specific, if I may: Curtis pretended to be "comfortable" 
with who he was, as Barry puts it. But that was a carefully constructed facade, 
and it took very little in the way of chipping to expose the real Curtis 
underneath. Anyone who ever tangled with Curtis discovered this.
 

 Curtis was "comfortable" with who he was as long as he didn't feel challenged. 
When he was feeling challenged, it was a very different story: his entire being 
became totally focused on defending himself and annihilating his challenger, 
using whatever means he could, no matter how duplicitous, including flat-out 
lying.
 
Curtis was not a nice guy, and while he fooled quite a few people, I was hardly 
the only person on FFL to see through his act.
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 I like Curtis, but I found him to be emotionally duplicitous - that means 
acting one way, while feeling another. Its a gut thing, Barry, so I cannot 
explain it further. Except to say that Curtis is not unique in that regard, and 
I show no prejudice, personally, towards him, as I avoid all of those who are 
ignorant of their true natures, equally. 
  >




RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 10 Ways Liars Use Words To Obscure the Truth

2013-11-28 Thread authfriend
Still infuriated, Xeno seethed: 
 
 > A well poisoner. Nice observation, including all the rest you wrote.

 

 "Nice," but false.
 

 > In post 363322 perhaps there is a clue. In a response to Share authfriend 
 > wrote:
 

 Hypocrisy and false metaphysics from Xeno too. Not a pretty sight.
 

 

 "P.S.: You're quite right about my childhood, albeit not in the way you hope. 
I had a happy, stress-free childhood with two parents who loved me deeply and 
steadfastly. They passed on their own devotion to authenticity and loathing of 
phoniness to me."
Whatever she feels is non authentic gets a dose of loathing, i.e., a feeling of 
intense dislike or disgust; hatred (that is the definition of the word). If you 
want to change the world, loathing is not the emotion I would want to operate 
from; it is the antithesis of acceptance, which is what spirituality develops 
(sometimes anyway). Loathing is the emotion you want to instill if you want to 
pass on intolerance. It is a blinding emotion. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 I've been an respondent on the internet since 1999, so it's not like I'm a 
newbie or something. And it's been my observation that Judy has a really big 
ego, maybe bigger even than Barry, and that's saying a lot! There are facts and 
there are opinions - facts can be argued, but an opinion stands no matter what, 
and that's everyone's right to express - you may not agree, but there should be 
no excuse for slandering your debating opponents.
 
 It's like when some people call others 'nazis' all the time - it soon loses 
its force, and in the end doesn't do justice to the real nazi victims.
 
 At first I thought Judy was being very astute when she called Barry a liar 
over and over again; then she started going after me with the same tactic. For 
awhile I thought there was something wrong with me and that maybe I did lack 
integrity. But now, after Judy called Buck a liar for no reason  at all, I've 
come to the conclusion that Judy is simply a well-poisoner. 
 
 That's her style I guess.
 
 Hey, I'm all for truthfulness and personal integrity, but I'm just not sure 
dialoging with anonymous informants in an online chat-room is the place to 
prove it - this is supposed to fun, not a trial by a one-person judge and jury. 
 
 But, it has reached a level now that she's calling almost everyone a liar, a 
troll, and/or a poser. 
 
 At this point, she's just a very unpleasant person to deal with and not very 
informative either. And, there's no relief when anyone starts up a dialog with 
her - it's incessant and endless. Barry is a case in point - from what I can 
tell, Judy carries a grudge for a very, very long time. Go figure.
 
 P.S. You may have noticed that Judy does NOT respond very elegantly to 
constructive criticism. If anyone can point to an untruth I've posted, please 
let me know and point my error - be specific, so we can resolve any 
misunderstandings. Thanks in advance.
 
 
 On 11/27/2013 10:33 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   I think Truth is something huge, that cannot really be completely conveyed 
in words alone. Unless the speaker or writer is communicating from a very 
settled and integrated level of consciousness. OTOH, unless someone has a 
nefarious intention, I think most people try to communicate truthfully. But 
each of us is limited by our connection to Truth. The most trustworthy people, 
imho, are those who recognize this and intend to become more and more truthful.
 
 
 
 
 On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:21 AM, Richard J. Williams  
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 Maybe, but I almost always suspect someone of not being totally honest when 
they post as an anonymous informant. I used to post under various handles until 
I got outed, and so I decided when I retired, I would just use my real name. 
I've got nothing to hide and nobody can fire me from my job since I'm 
self-employed now. But using a handle is no biggie to me  because I understand 
why some people need to keep their privacy.
 
 But, I did get a little paranoid reading Bill's post where he claimed Ravi had 
stalked or threatened, to what - expose Bill and his wife. What's up with that? 
 
 That's when things get REALLY nasty around here - I wouldn't blame Rick if he 
shut down the whole discussion group, if that's what going to happen here on a 
regular basis! It is always troubling to see someone get banned from the group. 
Where I used to work, you had to really screw up big time to get fired - like 
smoking pot in the parking lot or something like that. Hardly anyone gets 
banned on FFL - Kirk got banned for cursing too. Go figure.
 
 And, I don't care if people post mean things about me sometimes - it could 
always just be a joke of some kind - like when Barry2 posted that my real name 
was Walter White. LoL!
 
 
 On 11/27/2013 8:49 AM, anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... wrote:
 
   10 Ways Liars Use Words To Obscure the Truth
 http://liespotting.com/liespotting-basics/words/ 
http