Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why do many gurus shun siddhis? Part 1

2010-04-07 Thread Vaj


On Apr 7, 2010, at 9:47 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


Card, with all due respect, a more relevant question
might be, Why would anyone *want* siddhis?



So you can imagine your ego is connected to world events, like  
earthquakes, hurricanes, the stock market and stuff like that. It's  
expansion of consciousness baby!

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why do many gurus shun siddhis? Part 1

2010-04-07 Thread Bhairitu
Something more interesting  to do other than chop wood and carry water.  
  :-D

TurquoiseB wrote:
 Card, with all due respect, a more relevant question
 might be, Why would anyone *want* siddhis?

 I pose this as a question for those on this forum who
 might fall into that category, and look forward to 
 their answers.


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_re...@... wrote:
   
 I think there are at least two possible basic reasons, why
 many modern Indian gurus despise paatañjala-yoga-siddhis:

 1. The negative influence of Islam and Christianity

 2. Many gurus might not be that fluent in Sanskrit...

 



   



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why do many gurus shun siddhis? Part 1

2010-04-07 Thread Bhairitu
This is how siddhis are used in my tantric tradition.  For example we 
learn the maran siddhis to help someone who has supposedly had a maran 
spell cast on them.

yifuxero wrote:
 One of my Teachers - Hsuan Hua - stated that when he was living in Hong Kong 
 (10 years?...I've forgotten); no typhoons hit the City due to the fact that 
 he was using siddhis to block or dissipate the typhoons.  Although he rarely 
 used siddhis to directly impact the physical world; he regularly used them to 
 offset subtle negative influences, such as evil spirits and elementals.
 http://www.cttbusa.org/founder.asp

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote:
   
 Something more interesting  to do other than chop wood and carry water.  
   :-D

 TurquoiseB wrote:
 
 Card, with all due respect, a more relevant question
 might be, Why would anyone *want* siddhis?

 I pose this as a question for those on this forum who
 might fall into that category, and look forward to 
 their answers.


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
   
   
 I think there are at least two possible basic reasons, why
 many modern Indian gurus despise paatañjala-yoga-siddhis:

 1. The negative influence of Islam and Christianity

 2. Many gurus might not be that fluent in Sanskrit...

 
 


   



   



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why do many gurus shun siddhis? Part 1

2010-04-07 Thread Bhairitu
TurquoiseB wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifux...@... wrote:
   
 One of my Teachers - Hsuan Hua - stated that when he was living 
 in Hong Kong (10 years?...I've forgotten); no typhoons hit the 
 City due to the fact that he was using siddhis to block or 
 dissipate the typhoons.  Although he rarely used siddhis to 
 directly impact the physical world; he regularly used them to 
 offset subtle negative influences, such as evil spirits and 
 elementals.
 http://www.cttbusa.org/founder.asp
 

 I think you meant to say that he *believed* that he
 was dispelling subtle negative influences. So did
 Son of Sam.  :-)

 If someone here is claiming that such a mindset is
 not common in the TM movement, they're either crazy
 or haven't spent any time in it. I mean, just here
 on FFL we have examples of it. Think Card's many
 posts about some TM-sidhis course in some area of
 Europe affecting the weather. Think of Nabby. And
 this is to say nothing about many of Doug's/Buck's
 condescending posts about how special Fairfielders
 or meditators are.

 *Of course* the first thought that went through
 Chopra's mind was that he caused the earthquake.
 No one who has read his articles or books, or seen
 him talk, could doubt this for a moment. 

 On another subject entirely, I think Bhairitu's 
 answer to the question I posed below is a good one, 
 and possibly the *only* good one. 

 The reason is that it's all about fun, not ego. 

 Anyone who wants to learn siddhis to either 
 control nature or convince other people that
 they can is setting themselves up for some heavy-
 duty karma, plus an incarnation or two spent in
 ignorance. 

And that's why good teachers won't teach the siddhis to someone who has 
an ego driven reason to learn them.  As for them working I think they 
are beyond the current human level of understanding.  I wish I had saved 
a web site once by a westerner who  had studied tantra and had very good 
article on why he thought they worked.   I see human beings as something 
like mobile phones.  We can both transmit and receive either on the 
gross level through speech and direct action but also through 
transmitted thoughts.  The latter only works if one has a lot of 
concentrated shakti to direct.  It's like a 1 KW radio station doesn't 
broadcast very far compared with a 50,000 KW.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why do many gurus shun siddhis? Part 1

2010-04-07 Thread Bhairitu
WillyTex wrote:
 Bhairitu:
   
 This is how siddhis are used in my tantric tradition.  
 For example we learn the maran siddhis to help someone 
 who has supposedly had a maran spell cast on them...

 
 That makes a lot of sense - casting a 'spell' on someone
 who has had a spell cast upon them. A spell to get rid 
 of a spell. Yes, that's the ticket. Now, if you could 
 only learn to spell!

 maran:

 Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon: Search Results
 No entries found.

 http://webapps.uni-koeln.de/cgi-bin/tamil/recherche

Tamil?  ROTFL!  You need some smarts Willy.  It's in both my Hindi and 
Sanskrit dictionaries.  You must not know Devanagari.  You REALLY need 
to get some smarts but I don't know what you would do with them since 
you don't have a brain in your head.

Maran = kill.  And you don't cast a spell to get rid of the spell.