Re: Testing libsatsolver on Fedora
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:15:49AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/27/2009 04:31 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
I'm the author of the libsatsolver library, a library solves
package dependencies with a SAT algorithm.
This library is currently used in SUSE by YaST/zypp. I'm currently
trying to make it less SUSE specific like adding support for package
coloring and different repo handling, but I'm pretty sure I didn't
catch all things where Fedora is different from SUSE.
What's the eventual goal?
There's no real goal, I'm just trying to make the library as
flexible as possible.
So, if you have some spare time, could you give it a try and tell
me where it works well/ does stupid things/ doesn't work at all?
On Fedora 11 (x86_32)
$ sudo solv info coreutils. Keeping reading some of the metadata over
and over again instead of caching them it seems.
It doesn't cache them if it encountered errors.
It also reads the xml
files instead of sqlite databases supported more recently.
Yes, it doesn't make sense to support those, as libsatsolver doesn't
use sqlite.
Also claims
some of the repos don't have repomd.xml file while they do
http://fpaste.org/paste/20055
download error 6 means that curl exited with exit code 6, which
means Couldn't resolve host according to the man page. That's
pretty strange, because downloading repomd.xml seems to have worked,
but primary.xml.gz suddenly fails.
rpmfusion-free: is the repo configured to use a mirrorlist instead
of metalink? That's not supported yet. Should be easy to add, though.
$ sudo solv search quake3
returns nothing after reading some of the repos again for quite
sometime. Ping me in irc if you need to test specific commands more. I
am mether in freenode and usually in #fedora-devel
Probably because it couldn't read the primary.xml file because of
the download error 6 problem.
Thanks for testing!
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Markus Rex, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Testing libsatsolver on Fedora
I'm the author of the libsatsolver library, a library solves package dependencies with a SAT algorithm. This library is currently used in SUSE by YaST/zypp. I'm currently trying to make it less SUSE specific like adding support for package coloring and different repo handling, but I'm pretty sure I didn't catch all things where Fedora is different from SUSE. Sometime ago there were some packages submitted for the Zypper stack but the review could not be completed because it did not support 4.6 at that time. Atleast that is what the submitter had commented: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/442714 Cheers, Debarshi -- One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an imaginary part. -- Andrew Koenig -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Testing libsatsolver on Fedora
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:32:56AM +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote: Also claims some of the repos don't have repomd.xml file while they do http://fpaste.org/paste/20055 download error 6 means that curl exited with exit code 6, which means Couldn't resolve host according to the man page. That's pretty strange, because downloading repomd.xml seems to have worked, but primary.xml.gz suddenly fails. rpmfusion-free: is the repo configured to use a mirrorlist instead of metalink? That's not supported yet. Should be easy to add, though. RPM Fusion only offers mirrorlists. No metalinks. Adrian -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Lack of perl(Glib::MakeHelper) module?
Thanks a lot., Nicolas. I build my two package targeting to dist-f12. I rebuild them for fedora 12 not for fedora 11. Do you push the latest update to dist-f12? -- urlhttp://liangsuilong.co.cc/url Fight for freedom(3F） Ask not what your Linux distro can do for you! Ask what you can do for your Linux distro! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Testing libsatsolver on Fedora
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:32:56AM +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
Also claims
some of the repos don't have repomd.xml file while they do
http://fpaste.org/paste/20055
download error 6 means that curl exited with exit code 6, which
means Couldn't resolve host according to the man page. That's
pretty strange, because downloading repomd.xml seems to have worked,
but primary.xml.gz suddenly fails.
rpmfusion-free: is the repo configured to use a mirrorlist instead
of metalink? That's not supported yet. Should be easy to add, though.
RPM Fusion only offers mirrorlists. No metalinks.
Ok, solv now supports mirrorlists. Updated packages should be
available in an hour or two (depending on the build service load).
Thanks,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Markus Rex, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Testing libsatsolver on Fedora
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:38:06PM +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
I'm the author of the libsatsolver library, a library solves
package dependencies with a SAT algorithm.
This library is currently used in SUSE by YaST/zypp. I'm currently
trying to make it less SUSE specific like adding support for package
coloring and different repo handling, but I'm pretty sure I didn't
catch all things where Fedora is different from SUSE.
Sometime ago there were some packages submitted for the Zypper stack
but the review could not be completed because it did not support 4.6
at that time. Atleast that is what the submitter had commented:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/442714
Yes, but my goal is a bit different. I don't want to push libsatsolver
to Fedora (though I wouldn't mind if Fedora uses it ;-), it's about
improving results/performance of the library. Thus I'm interested in
where yum works better/ is faster.
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Markus Rex, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rpms/sylpheed/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sylpheed.spec, 1.100, 1.101
2009/7/28 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com You don't want to add ldconfig calls to the -devel package. Also, before shipping the API for this libsylph, keep an eye on the current discussion of it. means 2.7.0 comes to rawhide? -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rawhide report: 20090727 changes
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 23:56:41 +0100, Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote: Hi, kernel-2.6.31-0.94.rc4.fc12 --- * Fri Jul 24 2009 Chuck Ebbert cebb...@redhat.com - Enable CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT in debug kernels. (#513606) * Fri Jul 24 2009 Kristian Høgsberg k...@redhat.com - Add drm-page-flip.patch to support vsynced page flipping on intel chipsets. - Really add patch. - Fix patch to not break nouveau. Sorry, nouveau is still broken due the kernel. Works fine under 2.6.31-0.81.rc3.git4.fc12.i686.PAE, but nothing since. I've a GF7600 on this box. Is there a bugzilla for this already? I suspect I am seeing the same problem, but I wasn't sure if the nVidia drivers (from rpm fusion) had left something behind, so I hadn't reported it yet. Currently the nv driver doesn't work for me either. I think the cards I inherited are a bit older than yours, but the problem might be related. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Mixer Handling in PA 0.9.16/F12
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 15:59:58 +0200, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: When you test this, please make sure to run version 0.9.16-4.test3 of PA and 2.27.5 of gnome-media at least. Both are still stuck in Koji, aren't in Rawhide yet. mirrors2.kernel.org already has the 20090728 rawhide repo with those packages included. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[RFE] Auto-approve watchcommits and watchbugzilla in Pkgdb (2nd try)
Hello All! Since nobody changed anything after last discussion, I repean my proposal again (if someone missed it). Why we should approve manually requests to watching bugzilla and cvs changes for packages? I'm sure we need to change policy in order to automatically approve all such requests. See previous discussions: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/67465 (2007-10-26, started by Toshio Kuratomi) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/94641 (2008-10-12, started by Patrice Dumas) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/116848 (2009-07-06, started by me) -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Mixer Handling in PA 0.9.16/F12
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 15:59 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: When you test this, please make sure to run version 0.9.16-4.test3 of PA and 2.27.5 of gnome-media at least. Both are still stuck in Koji, aren't in Rawhide yet. Any plan to push this in F11 at some point ? (even if it stays in testing ?) Thanks, Pierre -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Mixer Handling in PA 0.9.16/F12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lennart Poettering wrote: Please note that it is our intention not to wrap obsolete mixer controls such as CD, PC Speaker, MIDI and so on. If you file a bug asking for those to be wrapped we will disappoint you and close the bug WONTFIX. Curious: would patches be accepted if someone else did it or is there just no support at all? - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpvRE8ACgkQiPi+MRHG3qSPsgCffnOp1HQKybognuYBL0svUJ7l cUYAoJ91fkfJ9TzAR17WYkBuK3z4UI6D =htuX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Mixer Handling in PA 0.9.16/F12
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Ben Boeckelmaths...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lennart Poettering wrote: Please note that it is our intention not to wrap obsolete mixer controls such as CD, PC Speaker, MIDI and so on. If you file a bug asking for those to be wrapped we will disappoint you and close the bug WONTFIX. Curious: would patches be accepted if someone else did it or is there just no support at all? as this would violate the design choices made I doubt such patches would be accepted. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rpms/sylpheed/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sylpheed.spec, 1.100, 1.101
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:48:42 +0200, Josephine wrote:
from dif cvs
-%define tarversion 2.6.0
+%global tarversion 2.7.0
you don't need to switch from define to global (
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define)
if 2 macros, %{tarversion} and %{version}, are using the same content
2.7.0
please remove tarversion to keep that clean!
No, don't. %tarversion is in there on purpose. For beta/rc releases,
%version and %tarversion differ. It doesn't make much sense to remove such
a variable and its usage in several places only to put it back when
necessary.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Mixer Handling in PA 0.9.16/F12
On Tue, 28.07.09 16:06, Pierre-Yves (pin...@pingoured.fr) wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 15:59 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: When you test this, please make sure to run version 0.9.16-4.test3 of PA and 2.27.5 of gnome-media at least. Both are still stuck in Koji, aren't in Rawhide yet. Any plan to push this in F11 at some point ? (even if it stays in testing ?) No. This change is very invasive. (Also, I always considered a pretty bad idea to updated already released distros for anything but security fixes and bugfixes.) Lennart -- Lennart PoetteringRed Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Mixer Handling in PA 0.9.16/F12
On Tue, 28.07.09 14:32, Ben Boeckel (maths...@gmail.com) wrote: Lennart Poettering wrote: Please note that it is our intention not to wrap obsolete mixer controls such as CD, PC Speaker, MIDI and so on. If you file a bug asking for those to be wrapped we will disappoint you and close the bug WONTFIX. Curious: would patches be accepted if someone else did it or is there just no support at all? Let me stress that we explicitly decided not to expose those controls. This has nothing to do with whether there are patches for that or not. So yeah, if you file a bug with a patch this will most likely be treated the same as a bug without a patch and closed WONTFIX. Lennart -- Lennart PoetteringRed Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Lower Process Capabilities
On 07/26/2009 07:32 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: If we change the bin directory to 005, then root cannot write to that directory unless it has the CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE capability. The idea with this project is to not allow network facing or daemons have CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE, but to only allow it from logins or su/sudo. What mechanism do you use to segregate things like yum-cron that do automatic security updates? Doesn't SELinux already support allowing non-root users to have access to low-numbered ports? There's also authbind and packet mangling. We have rsyslog rules for logfile writing now. Isn't it simpler to aim for not running daemons as root rather than redefining what root means? -Bill -- Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440 BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668 http://www.bfccomputing.com/Cell: 603.252.2606 Twitter, etc.: bill_mcgonigle Page: 603.442.1833 Email, IM, VOIP: b...@bfccomputing.com Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/ VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Mixer Handling in PA 0.9.16/F12
On Tue, 28.07.09 15:48, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: Please note that it is our intention not to wrap obsolete mixer controls such as CD, PC Speaker, MIDI and so on. If you file a bug asking for those to be wrapped we will disappoint you and close the bug WONTFIX. When you mean 'not wrap them', do you mean they're no longer selectable as a record source, if the hardware exports them? Yes. You cannot select them as record source, you cannot mute or unmute them, you cannot change their volume. CD, PC Speaker, MIDI and so on are just obsolete. If you want to control them you can always install alsamixer or gst-mixer or whatever. But really, this controls are obsolete. Lennart -- Lennart PoetteringRed Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Lower Process Capabilities
Once upon a time, Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.com said: Doesn't SELinux already support allowing non-root users to have access to low-numbered ports? AFAIK SELinux introduces additional controls and does not replace or override existing controls. I'm pretty sure non-root still can't directly listen on a low-numbered port. -- Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [RFE] Auto-approve watchcommits and watchbugzilla in Pkgdb (2nd try)
Toshio what is needed to make this happen ? FEsco need's to approve this ? On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Peter Lemenkovlemen...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All! Since nobody changed anything after last discussion, I repean my proposal again (if someone missed it). Why we should approve manually requests to watching bugzilla and cvs changes for packages? I'm sure we need to change policy in order to automatically approve all such requests. See previous discussions: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/67465 (2007-10-26, started by Toshio Kuratomi) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/94641 (2008-10-12, started by Patrice Dumas) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/116848 (2009-07-06, started by me) -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
pitivi-0.13.1.2-1.fc11, gnonlin-0.10.11.2-0.2.fc11
I've submitted updates to the latest prereleases of PiTiVi and gnonlin. It would be good if people could test these so that any kinks can be worked out before the final releases. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [RFE] Auto-approve watchcommits and watchbugzilla in Pkgdb (2nd try)
On 07/28/2009 01:18 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: Toshio what is needed to make this happen ? FEsco need's to approve this ? It was in my post to the last thread:: Is someone in a position to verify whether setting security flags on a bug prevents someone who would be put in the CC list by the default cc attribute would or would not let people see those bugs? Is someone in a position to tell me if watching a person in bugzilla would also let you violate this? I think people are generally amenable to autoapproving CC to watchbugzilla as long as security bugs do not send updates out to random people who have signed up to be CC'd. Knowing just how security bugs work allows us to evaluate what the risks are. -Toshio On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Peter Lemenkovlemen...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All! Since nobody changed anything after last discussion, I repean my proposal again (if someone missed it). Why we should approve manually requests to watching bugzilla and cvs changes for packages? I'm sure we need to change policy in order to automatically approve all such requests. See previous discussions: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/67465 (2007-10-26, started by Toshio Kuratomi) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/94641 (2008-10-12, started by Patrice Dumas) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/116848 (2009-07-06, started by me) -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28
On 07/28/2009 03:29 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: For those that had not noticed, rubygem-rails-2.3.3 requires rubygem-rack whatever-is-available-now, so... -- Jeroen == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-11-i386 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2 package: rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-11-ppc unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2 package: rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-11-ppc64 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2 package: rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-11-x86_64 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28
On 07/28/2009 03:29 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch from fedora-11-i386 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 These will be resolved with the next build of rubygem-actionpack (building now). -- Jeroen package: rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch from fedora-11-ppc unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 package: rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch from fedora-11-ppc64 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 package: rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch from fedora-11-x86_64 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Lower Process Capabilities
On 07/28/2009 04:11 PM, Chris Adams wrote: AFAIK SELinux introduces additional controls and does not replace or override existing controls. I'm pretty sure non-root still can't directly listen on a low-numbered port. For some reason I thought it was possible with MAC, but I can't find anything to support that. I might have been thinking of Solaris privileges. One simple alternative, sure to be unpopular with many, would be to patch the kernel to skip the low-numbered-port enforcement if SELinux is running in enforcing mode, and ship policies that do the right thing. Admins would have to purposely cripple their policies to make this insecure. However, init scripts would all have to become selinux savvy and know how to launch with the old model, which may be too tall an order. It also makes permissive mode more treacherous. Still, is such a change less severe than changing what root means? Is Fedora that committed to SELinux? What's it going to take to make most people who shut off SELinux stop doing that? -Bill -- Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440 BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668 http://www.bfccomputing.com/Cell: 603.252.2606 Twitter, etc.: bill_mcgonigle Page: 603.442.1833 Email, IM, VOIP: b...@bfccomputing.com Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/ VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Brainstorming Session for Fedora Community 2.0 - Monday August 3, 2009 - 1500 UTC
For those of you who haven't no idea what Fedora Community is, its our newest Fedora web application, providing a window into the Fedora distribution, and leveraging the power of Fedora's Account System, Bodhi, Bugzilla, Koji, and PackageDB into a single user-friendly website. It is built entirely with Free Software, such as Moksha and Turbogears 2. Fedora Community is designed to simplify Fedora workflows and bring transparency to Fedora processes: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community What you see on that URL is our 1.0 milestone, but we already have lots of ideas on improvements and new functionality that we'd like to develop for our 2.0 release. So, we're going to have a public brainstorming session on Monday, August 3rd, 2009: * The session will be held at 1500 UTC (11 AM Eastern) (In addition, if there are enough interested international folks who cannot attend the session due to their timezone, please let me know, and we will try to schedule a future session that works for you) We're going to use a variety of ways to be involved: * IRC: #moksha on irc.freenode.net (we'll be watching and taking questions from the channel) * Gobby: We're going to keep our notes in Gobby, an open source collaboration tool. The name of our document is Fedora Community Brainstorm, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/GobbyHowTo for information on how to connect * Telephone: This is where we'll be doing the talking. US Toll-Free: 800-451-8679 Conference Code: 22717 79826 (If you need an international dial-in number, please email me with your country, and I may be able to provide it.) Please be kind and mute your line if you're not asking a question. If the noise on the call becomes unbearable, I will mute everyone. :) Questions about the meeting? Email me. Questions about Fedora Community 2.0? Come to the brainstorming session! Can't make it to the session and want to suggest something? Login to Gobby and add it to our notes before the session. Thanks, Tom spot Callaway, Fedora Community Cat Herder ___ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Orphans on the chopping block for F12
As today is the Feature Freeze, I am preparing to block all the unblocked orphans. This is your last chance to pick one of them up. Those that remain unblocked at the end of my day (around UTC) will be blocked. Unblocked orphan apollon Unblocked orphan biniax Unblocked orphan bytelist Unblocked orphan constantine Unblocked orphan cryptix Unblocked orphan drapes Unblocked orphan elsa Unblocked orphan flpsed Unblocked orphan fmit Unblocked orphan fontypython Unblocked orphan galago-daemon Unblocked orphan galago-filesystem Unblocked orphan garmin-sync Unblocked orphan gdhcpd Unblocked orphan gfa Unblocked orphan gift Unblocked orphan gift-gnutella Unblocked orphan gift-openft Unblocked orphan gimp-lqr-plugin Unblocked orphan glipper Unblocked orphan gnochm Unblocked orphan gnome-audio Unblocked orphan gnome-compiz-manager Unblocked orphan gnome-vfs2-obexftp Unblocked orphan gnubiff Unblocked orphan goffice04 Unblocked orphan gstm Unblocked orphan ht2html Unblocked orphan jcodings Unblocked orphan jflex Unblocked orphan jline Unblocked orphan joni Unblocked orphan jrexx Unblocked orphan jruby Unblocked orphan junitperf Unblocked orphan jvyamlb Unblocked orphan kadu-theme Unblocked orphan klear Unblocked orphan ldapvi Unblocked orphan libchmxx Unblocked orphan libdockapp Unblocked orphan liblqr-1 Unblocked orphan metamonitor Unblocked orphan msv Unblocked orphan musicbox Unblocked orphan otl Unblocked orphan pam_keyring Unblocked orphan pcmanx-gtk2 Unblocked orphan perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse Unblocked orphan perl-Text-CHM Unblocked orphan pessulus Unblocked orphan piccolo Unblocked orphan pidgin-knotify Unblocked orphan plexus-container-default Unblocked orphan plexus-interactivity Unblocked orphan plexus-velocity Unblocked orphan puretls Unblocked orphan pystatgrab Unblocked orphan python-cjson Unblocked orphan python-dbsprockets Unblocked orphan qt-qsa Unblocked orphan quickfix Unblocked orphan ruby-flexmock Unblocked orphan scim-input-pad Unblocked orphan scim-skk Unblocked orphan scim-tomoe Unblocked orphan shapelib Unblocked orphan skkdic Unblocked orphan surfraw Unblocked orphan themes-backgrounds-gnome Unblocked orphan thinkfinger Unblocked orphan tomoe Unblocked orphan viewmtn Unblocked orphan w3lib Unblocked orphan wdm Unblocked orphan wmix Unblocked orphan wxdfast Unblocked orphan xml-commons-which Unblocked orphan xmms-cdread Unblocked orphan xyz-gallery List of deps left behind by orphan removal: Orphan: bytelist jruby requires bytelist = 1.0.1-0.2.svn9177.fc11 jvyamlb requires bytelist = 1.0.1-0.2.svn9177.fc11 Orphan: constantine jruby requires constantine = 0.4-3.fc11 Orphan: cryptix cryptix-asn1 requires cryptix = 3.2.0-12.fc11 puretls requires cryptix = 3.2.0-12.fc11 Orphan: gift apollon requires libgift.so.0 apollon requires gift-devel = 0.11.8.1-12.fc11 gift-gnutella requires libgift.so.0 gift-gnutella requires libgiftproto.so.0 gift-gnutella requires gift-devel = 0.11.8.1-12.fc11 gift-openft requires libgift.so.0 gift-openft requires libgiftproto.so.0 gift-openft requires gift-devel = 0.11.8.1-12.fc11 Orphan: ht2html jython requires ht2html = 2.0-9.fc11 Orphan: jcodings bytelist requires jcodings = 1.0.1-2.fc11 joni requires jcodings = 1.0.1-2.fc11 jruby requires jcodings = 1.0.1-2.fc11 jvyamlb requires jcodings = 1.0.1-2.fc11 Orphan: jflex opengrok requires jflex = 1.4.1-0.4.fc11 qdox requires jflex = 1.4.1-0.4.fc11 Orphan: jline jruby requires jline = 0.9.94-0.3.fc11 lucene requires jline = 0.9.94-0.3.fc11 maven-wagon requires jline = 0.9.94-0.3.fc11 maven2 requires jline = 0.9.94-0.3.fc11 plexus-interactivity requires jline = 0.9.94-0.3.fc11 rhino requires jline = 0.9.94-0.3.fc11 scala requires jline = 0.9.94-0.3.fc11 Orphan: joni jruby requires joni = 1.1.3-1.fc11 Orphan: junitperf dom4j requires junitperf = 1.9.1-3.2.fc11 Orphan: jvyamlb jruby requires jvyamlb = 0.2.5-2.fc11 Orphan: libdockapp wmacpi requires libdockapp.so.2 wmacpi requires libdockapp-devel = 0.6.2-2.fc11 Orphan: liblqr-1 gimp-lqr-plugin requires liblqr-1.so.0 gimp-lqr-plugin requires liblqr-1-devel = 0.1.0-7.fc11 Orphan: msv dom4j requires msv-xsdlib = 1:1.2-0.3.20050722.3.4.fc12.1 dom4j requires msv-msv = 1:1.2-0.3.20050722.3.4.fc12.1 Orphan: pcmanx-gtk2 gnash-plugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins gnome-chemistry-utils-mozplugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins mozilla-opensc-signer requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins swfdec-mozilla requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins Orphan: plexus-container-default maven-doxia requires plexus-container-default = 1.0-0.2.a8.1.2.fc11 maven-wagon requires plexus-container-default = 1.0-0.2.a8.1.2.fc11 maven2 requires plexus-container-default = 1.0-0.2.a8.1.2.fc11 maven2-plugin-source requires plexus-container-default =
MediaRepo: help needed in Packagekit
hello, I started an effort to add a feature to fedora https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MediaRepo I was told by David Zeuthen that the API of DeviceKit-disks is not yet stable he advised me to use GIO (GVolumeMonitor) so I made my patch implementation independent we can use HAL or DeviceKit or GIO the only thing need to be changed in different implementations is from yumMediaManager import MediaManager should be from yumMediaManagerHAL import MediaManager or from yumMediaManagerGIO import MediaManager ..etc. Richard Hughes had accepted my patch http://cgit.freedesktop.org/packagekit/commit/?id=3a75f454a53294a62a8f1eb93d0c3e53cc02a966 as you can see in that commit http://cgit.freedesktop.org/packagekit/tree/backends/yum/yumMediaManager.py there is no implementation but I made a HAL implementation, you can find it in PK mailing list http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/2009-July/005166.html I know hal is to be dropped, the hal code it's just a placeholder I want some to help me having a GIO version and a deviceKit version of yumMediaManager.py can anybody tell me what is the command line in deviceKit that works like this HAL dbus-send --system --print-reply --dest=org.freedesktop.Hal /org/freedesktop/Hal/Manager org.freedesktop.Hal.Manager.FindDeviceByCapability string:volume.disc or a simple hello world GIO segmetn in python that just list devices ..etc. any kind of help is welcome -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 08:34 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/26/2009 08:12 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 21:42 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: On 07/25/2009 08:56 PM, Björn Persson wrote: Fortunately I had read in this list that upgrading breaks Yum so I did a fresh install instead, and only had to spend a few days getting all the configuration back into shape. Sound started working after I deleted ~/.pulse. and if you is broken then the whole system is broken! so everybody have to spenda few days to get back their config. so we only have to spend a few days every half year. it's even worse then if i install windows. it's a really nice release. why is it so difficult to upgrade packages? I upgraded my laptop from F10 to F11, with X running, via yum. It worked flawlessly and rebooted clean. When I tried, FC-10's yum had been unable to process metalinks. May-be FC-10's yum has been updated since then ;) Oh, I forgot about that. There was a simple change you could do to the yum configuration files. I found it in the documentation for upgrading via yum on the Wiki. Good thing I read documentation, really, isn't it... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 08:34 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Anecdotal evidence means very little. It may be news to you, but a single negative result invalidates a whole series of positive tests ;) This is not remotely true. If we work for 99 people and not for 1, we're doing a much better job than if we don't work for 100. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 13:50 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: The worst about it: Unless rel-eng finally releases updated Fedroa 11 isos, the shameful situation about F11 installs will not see much improvements, because anaconda being FIXED UPSTREAM/RAWHIDE doesn't help FC11 users. That would be why we've been rolling updates.img files for the most serious anaconda issues, and documenting them on the Common Issues page. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphans on the chopping block for F12
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Mat Boothfed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote: As today is the Feature Freeze, I am preparing to block all the unblocked orphans. This is your last chance to pick one of them up. Those that remain unblocked at the end of my day (around UTC) will be blocked. Unblocked orphan jline Unblocked orphan junitperf Unblocked orphan msv Unblocked orphan plexus-container-default Unblocked orphan plexus-interactivity Unblocked orphan plexus-velocity Well, we should probably make sure maven still works since a bunch of projects probably depend on this to build, so I can take these. I'm fast becoming a one man Java SIG. :-/ Hmm, pkgdb won't let me take the devel branch of jline for some reason. What shall can I do about that? -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphans on the chopping block for F12
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Mat Boothfed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Mat Boothfed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Mat Boothfed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote: As today is the Feature Freeze, I am preparing to block all the unblocked orphans. This is your last chance to pick one of them up. Those that remain unblocked at the end of my day (around UTC) will be blocked. Unblocked orphan jline Unblocked orphan junitperf Unblocked orphan msv Unblocked orphan plexus-container-default Unblocked orphan plexus-interactivity Unblocked orphan plexus-velocity Well, we should probably make sure maven still works since a bunch of projects probably depend on this to build, so I can take these. I'm fast becoming a one man Java SIG. :-/ Hmm, pkgdb won't let me take the devel branch of jline for some reason. What shall can I do about that? Ah crap, just realised I'm in GMT+1, so I guess you've already started the blocking process... Erm yeah, I suck at maths. Going to bed before I embarrass myself further. -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Lower Process Capabilities
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 17:53:53 -0400, Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.com wrote: One simple alternative, sure to be unpopular with many, would be to patch the kernel to skip the low-numbered-port enforcement if SELinux is running in enforcing mode, and ship policies that do the right thing. Admins would have to purposely cripple their policies to make this insecure. I think after the selinux involvement in the recent popularized kernel exploit, that isn't going to happen. Having enforcing mode do things you can't in permissive mode is dangerous. While xguest will probably stay, I don't think you'll see too many other cases where selinux will give you extra privileges. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphans on the chopping block for F12
On 07/28/2009 03:48 PM, Mat Booth wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Mat Boothfed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote: Well, we should probably make sure maven still works since a bunch of projects probably depend on this to build, so I can take these. I'm fast becoming a one man Java SIG. :-/ Hmm, pkgdb won't let me take the devel branch of jline for some reason. What shall can I do about that? Taken care of. For some reason, the devel branch had been marked as retired. Since the package is not dead.package'd in cvs, I unretired it and made you the owner. -Toshio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 15:37:18 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 13:43 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: With all due respect to fedoraunity and you. To me it is a serious Fedora management and rel-eng mistake causing major harm to fedora's and RH's reputation to not provide updated media, thus to expose users to known bugs. I can't think of any major distro that actually does this. It's a very big effort that would take much manpower away from working on the installer and releng tasks for the next release. The discussion about whether that compromise would be justified has not been done yet. It's not as simple as you suggest. The first step should be getting anaconda updates in released versions. That at least allows people to make their own custom spins. If that process works smoothly, then later people might look at whether it is worth the time for Fedora to release official respins. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphans on the chopping block for F12
On 29.7.2009 00:12, Jesse Keating wrote: Orphan: ht2html jython requires ht2html = 2.0-9.fc11 Took ht2html because of jython, ah ya. CC: Andrew, are you aware of this? Regards, Milos -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphans on the chopping block for F12
On 29.7.2009 00:12, Jesse Keating wrote: Orphan: python-cjson sugar-datastore requires python-cjson = 1.0.5-3.fc11 For the record: I've contacted sugar-datastore maintainers to prevent bad things, Michael Stone (mstone) took this one. Regards, Milos -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphans on the chopping block for F12
I took ownership of Pessulus. gnochm, it has two co-maintainers: pertusus and wolfy, maybe one of them would take ownership. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:30 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: The first step should be getting anaconda updates in released versions. That at least allows people to make their own custom spins. If that process works smoothly, then later people might look at whether it is worth the time for Fedora to release official respins. And this is happening. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
Adam Williamson wrote: On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 13:50 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: The worst about it: Unless rel-eng finally releases updated Fedroa 11 isos, the shameful situation about F11 installs will not see much improvements, because anaconda being FIXED UPSTREAM/RAWHIDE doesn't help FC11 users. That would be why we've been rolling updates.img files for the most serious anaconda issues, and documenting them on the Common Issues page. IMO kernel issues should influence installer image updates, too... Jeff -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Lower Process Capabilities
Quoting Bill McGonigle (b...@bfccomputing.com): On 07/28/2009 04:11 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Still, is such a change less severe than changing what root means? Is Fedora that committed to SELinux? What's it going to take to make most people who shut off SELinux stop doing that? Moving to heavier exploitation of capabilities doesn't mean stop using SELinux. Any more than finding and fixing buffer overflows should only be done if we want to turn off selinux. -serge -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
On 07/29/2009 12:37 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 13:43 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: With all due respect to fedoraunity and you. To me it is a serious Fedora management and rel-eng mistake causing major harm to fedora's and RH's reputation to not provide updated media, thus to expose users to known bugs. I can't think of any major distro that actually does this. And? Isn't Fedora about innovation? It's a very big effort that would take much manpower away from working on the installer and releng tasks for the next release. The discussion about whether that compromise would be justified has not been done yet. It's not as simple as you suggest. My impression is you only say so because you're too close to Ole' Red Hat's habits and don't want to leave them. The key to implement what I said is a minimial installer image - Actually RH distros once had an installer which was very close to this. Unfortuately, this doesn't apply anymore. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Final agenda for tomorrow's special session FESCo meeting
As I'd mentioned on Monday, we're having a special FESCo meeting tomorrow at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting in order to review the following features for Fedora 12. 218 Rakudo Perl 6 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Rakudo_Perl_6 219 System Crypto database - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemCryptoDatabase 223 Virt TCK - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/VirtTCK 226 Media Repo - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MediaRepo 227 Split Softokn off from NSS - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SplitSoftoknFromNSS 228 Systemtap Eclipse GUI - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemTapEclipseGUI 229 Thusnelda - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Thusnelda 230 Volume Control Continued - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/VolumeControlContinued 231 Harfbuzz - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Harfbuzz This will be the last meeting for acceptance of Fedora 12 features. Thanks! -Jon -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Fedora 12 Tasks Starting or Ending in the Next Week
NameStart End Feature Submission and AcceptanceWed 2009-06-10 Tue 2009-07-28 Feature Freeze (no more features accepted) Tue 2009-07-28 Tue 2009-07-28 Orphan Rawhide Packages Tue 2009-07-28 Tue 2009-07-28 Finalize and Package Wallpaper for Alpha Tue 2009-07-28 Tue 2009-08-04 Alpha Test Compose (TC) (boot media testing) Wed 2009-07-29 Wed 2009-07-29 Test 'Test Compose' (boot media testing) Wed 2009-07-29 Wed 2009-08-05 Alpha Blocker Bug Day (F12Alpha) #3 Fri 2009-07-31 Fri 2009-07-31 Software String Freeze Tue 2009-08-04 Tue 2009-08-04 Start Alpha Freeze Tue 2009-08-04 Tue 2009-08-04 More details here: http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng-tasks.html ___ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Clipboard manager by default in Fedora 11
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 21:47 +0800, Ian Chapman wrote: On 26/07/09 05:06, Julian Aloofi wrote: I don't think that would count as a feature, and it isn't one. It's basically a program every system should have (in my opinion). The Gnome clipboard isn't working great. I often get complaints from new users I introduce to Fedora that their clipboard content was lost when they closed Firefox, or something similar. I'd like to see some consistency between how apps handle clipboard content, when 1. The user highlights content and pastes using the middle mouse button 2. The user uses the copy paste menu options or hot keys. They work as designed. They're intended to be separate. The middle click paste buffer is the 'junior', the ctrl-c / ctrl-v paste buffer is the 'senior'. Anything you cut/copy with ctrl-c / ctrl-v will overwrite anything that's currently in the middle click buffer, but not vice versa. That's how it's intended to work. The behaviour is always consistent if you understand the relationship between the buffers. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphans on the chopping block for F12
pystatgrab I took pystatgrab since ldtp needs it. Cheers, Debarshi -- One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an imaginary part. -- Andrew Koenig -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Updated Anaconda packages
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:41 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Jeremy Katz wrote: Regenerating the images is expensive -- it requires effort on the part of the developers doing fixes, release engineering doing builds with the fixes, QA testing the fixes, infrastructure (mirrors) carrying a significant amount more bits[1], ... The alternative being the current policy of telling users to go screw, That's not the current policy, as was clearly explained. Sufficiently nasty bugs have updates.img files made available. This is practically about as good as releasing an updated boot.iso; probably anyone who'd figure out to look for and use an updated boot.iso is capable of using an updates.img instead, and anyone who wouldn't manage to use an updates.img probably wouldn't manage to use a boot.iso either. if they are unlucky enough to hit a bug not found prior to release. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel .cvsignore, 1.19, 1.20 perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec, 1.23, 1.24 sources, 1.19, 1.20
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15111
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec sources
Log Message:
Update to 1.27
- various regex fixes for i18n and service names
- fix warnings from perl -w (CPAN RT#48131)
- improve handling of errors from Net::ssl_write_all
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -p -r1.19 -r1.20
--- .cvsignore 4 Jul 2009 21:19:59 - 1.19
+++ .cvsignore 28 Jul 2009 08:36:40 - 1.20
@@ -1 +1 @@
-IO-Socket-SSL-1.26.tar.gz
+IO-Socket-SSL-1.27.tar.gz
Index: perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.23 -r1.24
--- perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec 26 Jul 2009 06:42:14 - 1.23
+++ perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec 28 Jul 2009 08:36:40 - 1.24
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
#
Name: perl-IO-Socket-SSL
-Version: 1.26
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Version: 1.27
+Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Perl library for transparent SSL
Group: Development/Libraries
License: GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -60,13 +60,19 @@ done
%{_mandir}/man3/IO::Socket::SSL.3pm*
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 27 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.27-1
+- Update to 1.27
+ - various regex fixes for i18n and service names
+ - fix warnings from perl -w (CPAN RT#48131)
+ - improve handling of errors from Net::ssl_write_all
+
* Sat Jul 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.26-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
* Sat Jul 4 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.26-1
- Update to 1.26 (verify_hostname_of_cert matched only the prefix for the
hostname when no wildcard was given, e.g. www.example.org matched against a
- certificate with name www.exam in it)
+ certificate with name www.exam in it [#509819])
* Fri Jul 3 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.25-1
- Update to 1.25 (fix t/nonblock.t for OS X 10.5 - CPAN RT#47240)
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -p -r1.19 -r1.20
--- sources 4 Jul 2009 21:19:59 - 1.19
+++ sources 28 Jul 2009 08:36:40 - 1.20
@@ -1 +1 @@
-096319c7ceea6d4f42a264c55a3ea318 IO-Socket-SSL-1.26.tar.gz
+0099e07f576a84b5f34b6511138652c8 IO-Socket-SSL-1.27.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 447859] quilt refresh outputs various 'Prototype mismatch errors'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447859 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-28 14:25:51 EDT --- perl-gettext-1.05-16.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-gettext'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8065 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 447859] quilt refresh outputs various 'Prototype mismatch errors'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447859 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-28 14:27:01 EDT --- perl-gettext-1.05-16.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-gettext'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8069 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[pkgdb] perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse ownership updated
Package perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse in Fedora devel is now owned by cweyl To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[pkgdb] perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse ownership updated
Package perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse in Fedora 11 is now owned by cweyl To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[pkgdb] perl-Text-CHM ownership updated
Package perl-Text-CHM in Fedora 11 is now owned by cweyl To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Text-CHM -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[pkgdb] perl-Text-CHM ownership updated
Package perl-Text-CHM in Fedora devel is now owned by cweyl To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Text-CHM -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 512553] perl-AnyEvent-4.820-1.fc12 has missing dependencies in rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512553 Jonathan Kamens j...@kamens.brookline.ma.us changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-prefork/devel .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 perl-prefork.spec, 1.11, 1.12 sources, 1.5, 1.6
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1051
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-prefork.spec sources
Log Message:
* Wed Jul 29 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 1.04-1
- Upstream update.
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- .cvsignore 18 Jun 2009 03:33:08 - 1.5
+++ .cvsignore 29 Jul 2009 05:00:29 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-prefork-1.03.tar.gz
+prefork-1.04.tar.gz
Index: perl-prefork.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/devel/perl-prefork.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.11 -r1.12
--- perl-prefork.spec 26 Jul 2009 17:50:21 - 1.11
+++ perl-prefork.spec 29 Jul 2009 05:00:29 - 1.12
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-prefork
-Version: 1.03
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Version: 1.04
+Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Optimized module loading for forking or non-forking processes
License: GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.47
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) = 0.80
-BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.10
+BuildRequires: perl(List::Util) = 0.18
+BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.18
# Required by tests
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
@@ -55,6 +56,9 @@ make test AUTOMATED_TESTING=1
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed Jul 29 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 1.04-1
+- Upstream update.
+
* Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.03-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- sources 18 Jun 2009 03:33:08 - 1.5
+++ sources 29 Jul 2009 05:00:29 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8d0ca2f8b4a6d0c7489a5bd8101899b4 prefork-1.03.tar.gz
+47a514d4058ffc8cca184b28d6d54d0a prefork-1.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-prefork/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 perl-prefork.spec, 1.10, 1.11 sources, 1.5, 1.6
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1542/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-prefork.spec sources
Log Message:
* Wed Jul 29 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 1.04-1
- Upstream update.
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/F-11/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- .cvsignore 18 Jun 2009 03:33:08 - 1.5
+++ .cvsignore 29 Jul 2009 05:02:40 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-prefork-1.03.tar.gz
+prefork-1.04.tar.gz
Index: perl-prefork.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/F-11/perl-prefork.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11
--- perl-prefork.spec 18 Jun 2009 03:33:08 - 1.10
+++ perl-prefork.spec 29 Jul 2009 05:02:40 - 1.11
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-prefork
-Version: 1.03
+Version: 1.04
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Optimized module loading for forking or non-forking processes
License: GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.47
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) = 0.80
-BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.10
+BuildRequires: perl(List::Util) = 0.18
+BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.18
# Required by tests
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
@@ -55,6 +56,9 @@ make test AUTOMATED_TESTING=1
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed Jul 29 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 1.04-1
+- Upstream update.
+
* Thu Jun 18 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 1.03-1
- Upstream update.
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/F-11/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- sources 18 Jun 2009 03:33:09 - 1.5
+++ sources 29 Jul 2009 05:02:40 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8d0ca2f8b4a6d0c7489a5bd8101899b4 prefork-1.03.tar.gz
+47a514d4058ffc8cca184b28d6d54d0a prefork-1.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-prefork/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 perl-prefork.spec, 1.9, 1.10 sources, 1.5, 1.6
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1542/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-prefork.spec sources
Log Message:
* Wed Jul 29 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 1.04-1
- Upstream update.
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- .cvsignore 18 Jun 2009 03:33:09 - 1.5
+++ .cvsignore 29 Jul 2009 05:02:40 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-prefork-1.03.tar.gz
+prefork-1.04.tar.gz
Index: perl-prefork.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/F-10/perl-prefork.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10
--- perl-prefork.spec 18 Jun 2009 03:33:09 - 1.9
+++ perl-prefork.spec 29 Jul 2009 05:02:40 - 1.10
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-prefork
-Version: 1.03
+Version: 1.04
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Optimized module loading for forking or non-forking processes
License: GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.47
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) = 0.80
-BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.10
+BuildRequires: perl(List::Util) = 0.18
+BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.18
# Required by tests
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
@@ -55,6 +56,9 @@ make test AUTOMATED_TESTING=1
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed Jul 29 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 1.04-1
+- Upstream update.
+
* Thu Jun 18 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 1.03-1
- Upstream update.
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-prefork/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- sources 18 Jun 2009 03:33:09 - 1.5
+++ sources 29 Jul 2009 05:02:40 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8d0ca2f8b4a6d0c7489a5bd8101899b4 prefork-1.03.tar.gz
+47a514d4058ffc8cca184b28d6d54d0a prefork-1.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
