[Heads up] FUSE so-name bump is coming.
Hello All! I'll plan to upgrade fuse in Rawhide (and, possibly, in F-11) up to ver. 2.8.0, and there will be so-name bump. I'll do it next week, if nobody have any objections. Also I'll try to test all (or as much as I can) FUSE-related packages for compatibility with new package before (this weekend, probably). -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [Heads up] FUSE so-name bump is coming.
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:41:58AM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote: I'll plan to upgrade fuse in Rawhide (and, possibly, in F-11) up to ver. 2.8.0, and there will be so-name bump. I'll do it next week, if nobody have any objections. Also I'll try to test all (or as much as I can) FUSE-related packages for compatibility with new package before (this weekend, probably). There might be also F-12 branches around for fuse dependent packages. Maybe you also want to first branch F-12 off, so there can be builds in Rawhide for F-13 that will not disturb the F-12 Rawhide. Will you also rebuild the packages once the new fuse is in place? Regards Till pgpq2KwbtSztl.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 05:10:58PM +0100, José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi, first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set in the testing repository: OK, I have finally installed texlive on F11. With this update all worked (with the exception of some quirks already reported in this list). Unfortunately in the end I had a non working latex. It was likely caused by the missing texlive-latex provides. It should be fixed with the current package set. Making this story short for some reason texlive-latex was not installed when I had update the system. Installing it fixed the problem. Does it make sense to have the latex packages depending on this? The main texlive package now contains a dependency to texlive-latexrecommended so all the LaTeX recomended stuff should be pulled in automatically when just installing texlive. Jindrich Thanks, Jindrich Thanks for the hard, :-) -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 05:16:41PM -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote: José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt wrote: On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository. Jindrich One (really) minor hiccup, when installing all the doc files with yum install texlive-*-doc It is fixed now. I get a missing dependency texlive-wadalab-doc is needed by package texlive-cjk-doc. Excluding the later from the transaction works. This problems appears (unsurprisingly) on both F11 and rawhide. I get lots of dependency problems on (vanilla) rawhide x86_64. Stuff like: html2ps-1.0-0.3.b5.fc12.noarch, jadetex-3.13-8.fc12.noarch, linuxdoc-tools-0.9.65-2.fc12.x86_64, ... (perhaps due to other packages depending on texlive?) --skip-broken isn't able to fix the mess, and yum gives up. I'm not sure what is happenning on rawhide. Need to check. Jindrich -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de InformaticaFono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 234 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-09-06
On 09/08/2009 01:50 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le mardi 08 septembre 2009 à 09:11 +0800, Yuan Yijun a écrit : Hi, The package wine-fonts is not mentioned, why? Excellent question, it certainly should have been, and I have no idea why. Maybe it was not present in the source repo I used¹ when the test was run ? Otherwise repoquery may have a bug somewhere BTW is the name tahoma a trademark? It certainly is, but sine IIRC some badly written windows app crash directly if some specific windows fonts are not present, I suppose it made it as part of the windows ABI. You should ask spot for an opinion. Well, you can leave the filename as is, as the file name itself doesn't infringe on the trademark, but the internal name is WineTahoma, which does infringe and should be changed. This shouldn't affect the purpose of this font. Please block this bug against FE-Legal? ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Asterisk - attached patch needed to enable build in Rawhide
Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us writes: I plan on getting an update to Asterisk out ASAP, but it's taking _forever_ to rebuild the git repository that I use to maintain the various patches. I'll do a quick rebuild with the attached patch so I'm not blocking the openssl update. Is it really worth maintaining a significant amount of patches? With my private build of 1.6.1.6 I currently use these patches: Patch1: 0001-Modify-init-scripts-for-better-Fedora-compatibility.patch Patch2: 0002-Modify-modules.conf-so-that-different-voicemail-modu.patch Patch5: 0005-Build-using-external-libedit.patch Patch6: 0006-Revert-changes-to-pbx_lua-from-rev-126363-that-cause.patch Patch8: 0008-change-configure.ac-to-look-for-pkg-config-gmime-2.4.patch Patch10: 0010-my-guess-as-replacements-for-the-missing-broken-stuf.patch Patch11: 0011-Fix-up-some-paths.patch Patch12: 0012-Add-LDAP-schema-that-is-compatible-with-Fedora-Direc.patch I have changed some of the patches a little compared to the 1.6.1rc1 versions, just to make them apply. I have removed chan_mobile; if upstream prefers it to be in asterisk-addons, it seems a bit futile to keep trying to patch it in. I should probably drop Patch 6; if upstream hasn't dropped it in 6 months then it's probably something we have to live with. Not that I use Lua. Patches 2, 5, 8, and 12 ought to go upstream... /Benny -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Asterisk - attached patch needed to enable build in Rawhide
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Benny Amorsenbenny+use...@amorsen.dk wrote: Patch1: 0001-Modify-init-scripts-for-better-Fedora-compatibility.patch Patch2: 0002-Modify-modules.conf-so-that-different-voicemail-modu.patch Patch5: 0005-Build-using-external-libedit.patch Patch6: 0006-Revert-changes-to-pbx_lua-from-rev-126363-that-cause.patch Patch8: 0008-change-configure.ac-to-look-for-pkg-config-gmime-2.4.patch Patch10: 0010-my-guess-as-replacements-for-the-missing-broken-stuf.patch Patch11: 0011-Fix-up-some-paths.patch Patch12: 0012-Add-LDAP-schema-that-is-compatible-with-Fedora-Direc.patch Heh, see the latest builds in F-11/rawhide. The rawhide packages should be on the mirrors now, the F-11 build should be showing up shortly. I basically did the same thing as you. I have changed some of the patches a little compared to the 1.6.1rc1 versions, just to make them apply. Yeah, fortunately it was less work than I thought. I've really grown to depend on git's merging/rebasing/cherry-picking abilities. Hopefully my git mirror of the asterisk svn will finish rebuilding soon. Digium may also be putting up a semi-official git mirror as well. I have removed chan_mobile; if upstream prefers it to be in asterisk-addons, it seems a bit futile to keep trying to patch it in. Yeah, I don't know what I was thinking when I added it in. I should probably drop Patch 6; if upstream hasn't dropped it in 6 months then it's probably something we have to live with. Not that I use Lua. Patches 2, 5, 8, and 12 ought to go upstream... Yeah, it's a matter of time/energy. Plus a couple of them really need some polishing before they would even be considered. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: clang static analyzer: use it!
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Steve Grubbsgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Friday 04 September 2009 02:30:14 am Jim Meyering wrote: Quick summary: use this tool: http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/ If you're not using its scan-build tool, then start. Right now. Really. It's that good. llvm is in Fedora. Looking at the build instructions for clang, it seems like it would naturally fit as a subpackage for llvm. So, getting it into Fedora should not be too much to do since llvm is already approved. The latest Rawhide llvm build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130997 -- which you'd probably have to install manually until it hits the Rawhide mirrors -- have clang's analyzer packaged. Once it lands properly you can have llvm, llvm-clang (the compiler) and llvm-clang-analyzer installed by simply doing yum install llvm-clang-analyzer I might push this into F-11 too, once LLVM 2.6 comes out, if simply to provide the analyzer to our F-11 users. Cheers, -- Michel Alexandre Salim -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Fedora 12 Development and Release Engineering Schedule Reminder
Name Start End Alpha Testing Tue 2009-08-25 Tue 2009-09-29 Snapshot Releases Wed 2009-09-02 Fri 2009-09-18 Compose Snap #2Wed 2009-09-09 Wed Name Start End Alpha Testing Tue 2009-08-25 Tue 2009-09-29 Snapshot Releases Wed 2009-09-02 Fri 2009-09-18 Compose Snap #2Wed 2009-09-09 Wed 2009-09-09 Snapshot 2 Wed 2009-09-09 Fri 2009-09-11 Stage Sync Snap #2 Thu 2009-09-10 Fri 2009-09-11 Public Availability Snap #2Fri 2009-09-11 Fri 2009-09-11 Beta Blocker Bug Day (F12Beta) #1 Fri 2009-09-11 Fri 2009-09-11 Compose Snap #3Wed 2009-09-16 Wed 2009-09-16 Snapshot 3 Wed 2009-09-16 Fri 2009-09-18 Stage Sync Snap #3 Thu 2009-09-17 Fri 2009-09-18 Beta Blocker Bug Day (F12Beta) #2 Fri 2009-09-18 Fri 2009-09-18 Public Availability Snap #3Fri 2009-09-18 Fri 2009-09-18 Software: Start Rebuild all translated packagesTue 2009-09-22 Tue 2009-09-22 Software: Rebuild all translated packages Tue 2009-09-22 Tue 2009-09-29 2009-09-09 Snapshot 2 Wed 2009-09-09 Fri 2009-09-11 Stage Sync Snap #2 Thu 2009-09-10 Fri 2009-09-11 Public Availability Snap #2Fri 2009-09-11 Fri 2009-09-11 Beta Blocker Bug Day (F12Beta) #1 Fri 2009-09-11 Fri 2009-09-11 Compose Snap #3Wed 2009-09-16 Wed 2009-09-16 Snapshot 3 Wed 2009-09-16 Fri 2009-09-18 Stage Sync Snap #3 Thu 2009-09-17 Fri 2009-09-18 Beta Blocker Bug Day (F12Beta) #2 Fri 2009-09-18 Fri 2009-09-18 Public Availability Snap #3Fri 2009-09-18 Fri 2009-09-18 Software: Start Rebuild all translated packagesTue 2009-09-22 Tue 2009-09-22 Software: Rebuild all translated packages Tue 2009-09-22 Tue 2009-09-29 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [PATCH 3/3] dracut has initrd-generic-version instead of initrd-version (#519185)
On 09/03/2009 12:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Hans de Goede (j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl) said: It really is like having to support gentoo, versus having to support a distro using pre build packages. And I would really like to move to the having to support a pre-build package model for the initrd. The problem is this: The kernel binary RPM contains this pre-built initrd. The kernel source RPM does not contain the sources necessary to make this pre-built initrd. This makes me rather uncomfortable from a Licensing perspective. True, but we do provide SRPMS with the sources, if we include a list of the SRPMS with the sources, with full NEVR in the kernel rpm as doc, wouldn't that be sufficient? Not really. In the case of initrd-built-with-kernel, it could be packages in the buildroot that never leave koji for release/updates, and are then garbage collected. There's a related problem here - glibc32 . -- Peter I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there. -- Feynman -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: The main texlive package now contains a dependency to texlive-latexrecommended so all the LaTeX recomended stuff should be pulled in automatically when just installing texlive. Thank you. :-) It is nice to see texlive-2009 shaping so well for Fedora. :-D Jindrich -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-09-06
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Excellent question, it certainly should have been, and I have no idea why. Maybe it was not present in the source repo I used¹ when the test was run ? Otherwise repoquery may have a bug somewhere ¹ http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86 _64/os/Packages/ If you're only getting x86_64, that can do it. Wine is i586 only. Either getting i586 pkgs or also getting multilibs would do the trick. - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqmaCQACgkQiPi+MRHG3qR/UQCeJa55mr4pNmeGVuFMbSILt0WF wY4AoJFRi5cCbcza6zMI11LgJ5pTfrXa =73mM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [Heads up] FUSE so-name bump is coming.
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Peter Lemenkov wrote: I'll plan to upgrade fuse in Rawhide (and, possibly, in F-11) up to ver. 2.8.0, and there will be so-name bump. Rationale for considering doing it in F-11? See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/MaintainerResponsibility#Notify_others_of_changes_that_may_affect_their_packages -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [PATCH 3/3] dracut has initrd-generic-version instead of initrd-version (#519185)
On 09/04/2009 12:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:53:19AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: The problem I have is that some folks want to include additional drivers into their initrd. What are we going to recommend for this case? I know one can still build a kernel-specific version, but I fear that this results in many users having no benefit of the generic image because it'll not contain the additional bits they needed to add. Isn't the point of the new infrastructure that we can provide multiple initramfs modules that will all end up in the filesystem on boot? Users who want to add drivers could do it even more easily than they currently can. I am skeptical that we are ready for this. Not all non-x86 boot loaders are capable of handling multiple initrd's, and various types of netboot wont do it either. This is a very late time to rely upon such a new feature for something this important. Warren -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [PATCH 3/3] dracut has initrd-generic-version instead of initrd-version (#519185)
On 09/08/2009 12:04 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 09/08/2009 11:10 AM, Peter Jones wrote: There's a related problem here - glibc32 . I don't think we distribute glibc32. Hrm. Yeah, probably jumped the gun there. Just want to make sure we keep it in mind. -- Peter I hope you know that this will go down on your permanent record. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
KDE-SIG weekly report (37/2009)
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply to this email or add it to the related meeting page. -- = Weekly KDE Summary = Week: 37/2009 Time: 2009-09-08 14:00 UTC Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2009-09-08 Meeting minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting/2009-09-08/fedora-meeting.2009-09-08-14.07.html Meeting log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting/2009-09-08/fedora-meeting.2009-09-08-14.07.log.html -- = Participants = * BenBoeckel * JaroslavReznik * KevinKofler * ThanNgo * EikeHein * RexDieter -- = Agenda = * topics to discuss: o switching back to standalone Phonon and Phonon-xine, as Qt's Phonon and its backends will not be updated anymore [1] [2] [3] o KDE-4.3.1 state o constantine-kde-theme o Red Hat Developer Conference 2009 Brno [4] = Summary = o switching back to standalone Phonon and Phonon-xine * we didn't agreed on, decision postponed now, waiting for KDE e.V. and Nokia solution * we have to retest both -gstreamer and -xine backends according to our test plan o KDE-4.3.1 state * pushed to updates-testing o constantine-kde-theme * near to final, please test * widescreen is still broken (fixed with latest build, jreznik) o Red Hat Developer Conference 2009 Brno * invitation to Brno (and reminder for Kevin Kofler) -- = Next Meeting = http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2009-09-15 = Links = [1] http://doc.trolltech.com/4.6-snapshot/phonon-module.html [2] http://doc.trolltech.com/4.7-snapshot/phonon-module.html [3] http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2009/09/03/multimedia/ [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DeveloperConference2009 -- Jaroslav Řezník jrez...@redhat.com Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 731 455 332 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
New desktop oriented scheduler
Fedora is desktop oriented distro so when I saw that a new desktop oriented scheduler was released [1] it immediately raised an eyebrow or two. BFS scheduler claims to be simple but very effective, has anybody tried BFS? Is there a simple guide how to patch kernel, compile and test (and compare) it to stock Fedora kernel? Cheers. [1] http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/09/06/0433209/Con-Kolivas-Returns-With-a-Desktop-Oriented-Linux-Scheduler?from=rss -- pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, msn: valent.turko...@hotmail.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [PATCH 3/3] dracut has initrd-generic-version instead of initrd-version (#519185)
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:45:43PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote: On 09/04/2009 12:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: Isn't the point of the new infrastructure that we can provide multiple initramfs modules that will all end up in the filesystem on boot? Users who want to add drivers could do it even more easily than they currently can. I am skeptical that we are ready for this. Not all non-x86 boot loaders are capable of handling multiple initrd's, and various types of netboot wont do it either. This is a very late time to rely upon such a new feature for something this important. cpio archives can be concatenated, right? It seems like a straightforward workaround. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [PATCH 3/3] dracut has initrd-generic-version instead of initrd-version (#519185)
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 12:47 -0400, Peter Jones wrote: On 09/08/2009 12:04 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 09/08/2009 11:10 AM, Peter Jones wrote: There's a related problem here - glibc32 . I don't think we distribute glibc32. Hrm. Yeah, probably jumped the gun there. Just want to make sure we keep it in mind. -- Peter I hope you know that this will go down on your permanent record. The related problem is that we need to make sure that glibc32/64 stays current with the real glibc counterparts, so that what we build against is shipped in the real glibc srpms. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Asterisk - attached patch needed to enable build in Rawhide
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:17:55 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote: Heh, see the latest builds in F-11/rawhide. The rawhide packages should be on the mirrors now, the F-11 build should be showing up shortly. I basically did the same thing as you. That's for doing those updates. I had given up on it when after some upgrade (probably the kernel) broken it so that it would lock up (at least the part handling my tdm400p) after about a half hour. It may be the real fix is update dahdi drivers from ATrpms, but your update is what triggered my checking to see if there was updated Dahdi drivers to go with updated asterisk. I did notice the updated dahdi drivers use dahdi-channels.conf instead of chan-dahdi.conf. So people will want to do includes, copies or sym links between those two files. I am hoping the setup will still be working during the Fedora Talk FAD when I hope to participate remotely for at least some of the time. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [PATCH 3/3] dracut has initrd-generic-version instead of initrd-version (#519185)
On 09/08/2009 11:10 AM, Peter Jones wrote: There's a related problem here - glibc32 . I don't think we distribute glibc32. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: clang static analyzer: use it!
On Tue, 08.09.09 10:33, Michel Alexandre Salim (michael.silva...@gmail.com) wrote: The latest Rawhide llvm build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130997 -- which you'd probably have to install manually until it hits the Rawhide mirrors -- have clang's analyzer packaged. Once it lands properly you can have llvm, llvm-clang (the compiler) and llvm-clang-analyzer installed by simply doing yum install llvm-clang-analyzer Thanks for packaging this. Unfortunately it doesn't really work: Whatever I try to use scan-build on I get: Can't exec clang-cc: No such file or directory at /usr/lib64/clang-analyzer/libexec/ccc-analyzer line 216. readline() on closed filehandle FROM_CHILD at /usr/lib64/clang-analyzer/libexec/ccc-analyzer line 222. Adding /usr/libexec/ to the $PATH seems to fix this. However, it still can't find any standard C includes then. Lennart -- Lennart PoetteringRed Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: New desktop oriented scheduler
2009/9/8 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com: Fedora is desktop oriented distro so when I saw that a new desktop oriented scheduler was released [1] it immediately raised an eyebrow or two. BFS scheduler claims to be simple but very effective, has anybody tried BFS? You can find some results (and of course facts) about BFS here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/886319/ -- Regards, Niels -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: clang static analyzer: use it!
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 07:33:10 am Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: The latest Rawhide llvm build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130997 -- which you'd probably have to install manually until it hits the Rawhide mirrors -- have clang's analyzer packaged. Once it lands properly you can have llvm, llvm-clang (the compiler) and llvm-clang-analyzer installed by simply doing yum install llvm-clang-analyzer I might push this into F-11 too, once LLVM 2.6 comes out, if simply to provide the analyzer to our F-11 users. Please do :). Regards, -- Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rawhide report: 20090908 changes
Compose started at Tue Sep 8 06:15:08 UTC 2009 Broken deps for i386 -- anerley-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0 anerley-devel-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires pkgconfig(libmissioncontrol) 1:anjuta-2.27.3.0-3.fc12.i686 requires libdevhelp-1.so.0 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-cairo-0.8.so.0 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libcluttermm-0.8.so.2 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.8.so.0 clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires pkgconfig(cluttermm-0.8) clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires pkgconfig(clutter-0.8) clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-gtk-0.9.so.0 clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0 clutter-gtkmm-devel-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.9) collectd-mysql-4.5.3-2.fc11.i586 requires libcrypto.so.8 collectd-mysql-4.5.3-2.fc11.i586 requires libssl.so.8 collectd-nut-4.5.3-2.fc11.i586 requires libcrypto.so.8 collectd-nut-4.5.3-2.fc11.i586 requires libssl.so.8 collectd-snmp-4.5.3-2.fc11.i586 requires libcrypto.so.8 cpptasks-javadoc-1.0b5-2.fc12.noarch requires cpptasks-1.0b5-2.fc12 gnome-phone-manager-0.65-4.fc12.i686 requires libgnokii.so.4 gnome-phone-manager-telepathy-0.65-4.fc12.i686 requires libgnokii.so.4 gpsdrive-2.10-0.1.pre7.fc12.i586 requires libmapnik.so.0.5 6:kdepim-4.3.1-1.fc12.i686 requires libgnokii.so.4 1:libopensync-plugin-gnokii-0.22-3.fc12.i686 requires libgnokii.so.4 network-manager-netbook-1.2-5.fc12.i686 requires libnm_glib.so.0 openvrml-0.18.3-1.fc12.i686 requires java(x86-32) openvrml-0.18.3-1.fc12.i686 requires gecko-libs(x86-32) = 0:1.9.1 ppl-yap-0.10.2-5.fc12.i686 requires libYap.so python-repoze-what-quickstart-1.0-2.fc12.noarch requires python-repoze-who-plugins-sql python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.fc10.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.5 qtparted-0.4.5-19.fc11.i586 requires libparted-1.8.so.8 rygel-0.3-5.fc12.i686 requires libgee.so.0 rygel-tracker-0.3-5.fc12.i686 requires libgee.so.0 Broken deps for x86_64 -- anerley-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0 anerley-0.0.20-3.fc12.x86_64 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0()(64bit) anerley-devel-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires pkgconfig(libmissioncontrol) anerley-devel-0.0.20-3.fc12.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(libmissioncontrol) 1:anjuta-2.27.3.0-3.fc12.i686 requires libdevhelp-1.so.0 1:anjuta-2.27.3.0-3.fc12.x86_64 requires libdevhelp-1.so.0()(64bit) clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-cairo-0.8.so.0 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libcluttermm-0.8.so.2 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.8.so.0 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libclutter-glx-0.8.so.0()(64bit) clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libclutter-cairo-0.8.so.0()(64bit) clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libcluttermm-0.8.so.2()(64bit) clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires pkgconfig(cluttermm-0.8) clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires pkgconfig(clutter-0.8) clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(cluttermm-0.8) clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(clutter-0.8) clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-gtk-0.9.so.0 clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0 clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.x86_64 requires libclutter-gtk-0.9.so.0()(64bit) clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.x86_64 requires libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0()(64bit) clutter-gtkmm-devel-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.9) clutter-gtkmm-devel-0.9.4-1.fc12.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.9) collectd-mysql-4.5.3-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libcrypto.so.8()(64bit) collectd-mysql-4.5.3-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libssl.so.8()(64bit) collectd-nut-4.5.3-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libcrypto.so.8()(64bit) collectd-nut-4.5.3-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libssl.so.8()(64bit) collectd-snmp-4.5.3-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libcrypto.so.8()(64bit) cpptasks-javadoc-1.0b5-2.fc12.noarch requires cpptasks-1.0b5-2.fc12 gnome-phone-manager-0.65-4.fc12.x86_64 requires libgnokii.so.4()(64bit) gnome-phone-manager-telepathy-0.65-4.fc12.x86_64 requires libgnokii.so.4()(64bit) gpsdrive-2.10-0.1.pre7.fc12.x86_64 requires libmapnik.so.0.5()(64bit) 6:kdepim-4.3.1-1.fc12.x86_64 requires libgnokii.so.4()(64bit) 1:libopensync-plugin-gnokii-0.22-3.fc12.x86_64 requires
Re: clang static analyzer: use it!
On Tue, 08.09.09 19:52, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote: On Tue, 08.09.09 10:33, Michel Alexandre Salim (michael.silva...@gmail.com) wrote: The latest Rawhide llvm build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130997 -- which you'd probably have to install manually until it hits the Rawhide mirrors -- have clang's analyzer packaged. Once it lands properly you can have llvm, llvm-clang (the compiler) and llvm-clang-analyzer installed by simply doing yum install llvm-clang-analyzer Thanks for packaging this. Unfortunately it doesn't really work: Whatever I try to use scan-build on I get: Can't exec clang-cc: No such file or directory at /usr/lib64/clang-analyzer/libexec/ccc-analyzer line 216. readline() on closed filehandle FROM_CHILD at /usr/lib64/clang-analyzer/libexec/ccc-analyzer line 222. Adding /usr/libexec/ to the $PATH seems to fix this. However, it still can't find any standard C includes then. Hmm, I need to correct myself, this seems to work fine: CFLAGS=-I/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.1/include/ scan-build ./autogen.sh CFLAGS=-I/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.1/include/ scan-build make Thanks again for packaging. Lennart -- Lennart PoetteringRed Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Adding a project to transifex
2009/9/7 Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com: snip/ Thanks, Matt Woah, that was spinning me out for a second there. It's got my name on it, but I don't remember writing it. Turns out I'm the *other* mbooth... ;-) Ahem, carry on! -- Mat Booth -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: New desktop oriented scheduler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Valent Turkovic wrote: Fedora is desktop oriented distro so when I saw that a new desktop oriented scheduler was released [1] it immediately raised an eyebrow or two. BFS scheduler claims to be simple but very effective, has anybody tried BFS? Is there a simple guide how to patch kernel, compile and test (and compare) it to stock Fedora kernel? Cheers. [1] http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/09/06/0433209/Con- Kolivas-Returns-With-a-Desktop-Oriented-Linux-Scheduler?from=rss There's a class here I'm taking that will involve having around with our kernels with BFS. I'll be patching up the kernel from Fedora and using that for the class. I'd be willing to collaborate with others on getting this to work. - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqmtMUACgkQiPi+MRHG3qQyiwCgqHsabEEDZvwgidV08dZFfKGT 19kAn1wOXToBlEeIiwNaHtPCg/fv1Ryp =oIQm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Graphics Test Week (ATI, NVIDIA and Intel graphics Test Days)
Yes, it is now that legendary time, well loved by the hearts of men for millennia(*): Graphics Test Week! Tomorrow - 2009-09-09 - is ATI/AMD Radeon graphics card Test Day (1). Thursday - 2009-09-10 - is NVIDIA graphics card Test Day (2). And Friday - 2009-09-11 - is Intel graphics card Test Day (3). I am currently rolling up a pair of live CD images that will likely be used for all three days; they should be uploaded soon. Please, please grab the live CDs, do the testing, and come out to the Test Day(s) for the graphics hardware you own! As always, graphics are a critical piece of Fedora and we want to make sure Fedora 12 works on as wide a range of graphics hardware as possible. The testing's very easy to do and it shouldn't take more than an hour of your time to boot the live CD and run the tests. There's no need to install anything to hard disk. You don't even need to be a Fedora user to take part, and what's in Fedora's drivers today will be in everyone else's tomorrow, so helping us test this benefits all distributions down the road. The Test Day gatherings themselves are held in IRC, in channel #fedora-test-day on the Freenode network. Please do join in if you can - we can help advise you with any questions you have, and if you run into bugs, the developers can investigate them with you right away. If you can't make it out for the actual day, though, you can still do the testing, and your results are still useful! Just download the live image, do the tests, and fill in the results table as the page instructs. Many thanks to everyone who's able to make it out and do the testing. Remember - tomorrow ATI; Thursday NVIDIA; Friday Intel. * - well, okay. Not really millennia. More like...months. (1) - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2009-09-09_Radeon (2) - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2009-09-10_Nouveau (3) - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2009-09-11_Intel -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rawhide report: 20090908 changes
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 17:35 +, Rawhide Report wrote: Broken deps for i386 -- clutter-*mm requires btw, what's the story here. These clutter-*mm packages have been broken for ages now. Are the mm bindings dead upstream ? ppl-yap-0.10.2-5.fc12.i686 requires libYap.so FWIW 521588 now has a fix for what's been probably blocking this rebuild. C. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Graphics Test Week (ATI, NVIDIA and Intel graphics Test Days)
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 14:26:06 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Tomorrow - 2009-09-09 - is ATI/AMD Radeon graphics card Test Day (1). Thursday - 2009-09-10 - is NVIDIA graphics card Test Day (2). And Friday - 2009-09-11 - is Intel graphics card Test Day (3). I am currently rolling up a pair of live CD images that will likely be used for all three days; they should be uploaded soon. Please, please grab the live CDs, do the testing, and come out to the Test Day(s) for the graphics hardware you own! As always, graphics are a critical piece of Fedora and we want to make sure Fedora 12 works on as wide a range of graphics hardware as possible. Are you going to try to include kernel-2.6.31-0.212.rc9.git1.fc12 as it claims to have some Nouvaeu fixes in it? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Graphics Test Week (ATI, NVIDIA and Intel graphics Test Days)
Tomorrow - 2009-09-09 - is ATI/AMD Radeon graphics card Test Day (1). Just in case there is a lull with nothing to do, please look at this existing crash-and-burn with an RV710: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521322 -- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
TeXLive 2009 texconfig
texconfig from TeXLive 2009 in F11 hangs when I attempt to set the dvips default paper type. The hang occurs when I run texconfig as a user and texconfig or texconfig-sys as root. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
GCC var-tracking-assignments: testing and bug reports appreciated
Jakub built gcc-4.4.1-10 earlier today, with a new feature that generates much better debug information in optimized programs. The feature has been under development for a couple of years, and it's recently been accepted into GCC, for GCC 4.5. We've backported it for Fedora 12. I'd appreciate if you Cc: me on any bug reports you hit that might be related with this new feature (GCC internal compiler errors, verify_ssa failures, crashes, etc). It's very important that any such bugs you run into be reported quickly: I'm going to be around this week, full time, working on this, but my network connectivity will be poor at best next week. In case you suspect a problem might be caused by this new feature, instead of say untagging the GCC build, please instead install a temporary work-around in your package to compile with the flag -fno-var-tracking-assignments. If it compiles with this flag, the you know I'm the culprit. Mentioning the successful use of this work around in the bug report may help prioritize the resolution of bugs. If you follow this path, I suggest also creating a bug report on your package, blocked on the resolution of the GCC bug, so that, once the GCC bug is fixed, you're reminded to remove the work-around. Thanks in advance for your cooperation, -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighterhttp://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Graphics Test Week (ATI, NVIDIA and Intel graphics Test Days)
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 17:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 14:26:06 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Tomorrow - 2009-09-09 - is ATI/AMD Radeon graphics card Test Day (1). Thursday - 2009-09-10 - is NVIDIA graphics card Test Day (2). And Friday - 2009-09-11 - is Intel graphics card Test Day (3). I am currently rolling up a pair of live CD images that will likely be used for all three days; they should be uploaded soon. Please, please grab the live CDs, do the testing, and come out to the Test Day(s) for the graphics hardware you own! As always, graphics are a critical piece of Fedora and we want to make sure Fedora 12 works on as wide a range of graphics hardware as possible. Are you going to try to include kernel-2.6.31-0.212.rc9.git1.fc12 as it claims to have some Nouvaeu fixes in it? It's already in there. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Bug 520505] Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505 --- Comment #13 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2009-09-08 02:47:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) You claimed I'd done actual harm to Fedora No I didn't, please read comment 4 again (I guess that's what you're referring to). But let's not get caught up with this or other word games. How about, instead of bashing, we sit down and try to work out how to best do this I have plenty on my plate so no thanks for now. But on a brief look, FullyTestablePerl looks like a good idea that would pretty much eliminate my concerns. And Stepan's suggestion at end of comment 9 (+ some real thought from the packagers whether to ship the tests) would be an improvement in the meantime. I'd like to see the evidence of any concrete harm done specific to including the test suites in %_docdir, but I haven't seen any yet The reasons given in comment 8 demonstrate why I think this stuff is harmful. IMO it makes affected packages worse than they would be without those issues, which I think qualifies this practice as harmful. You don't agree with it, but the evidence is there, and one (very insignificant) manifestation of it is this very bug. Dismissing it as handwaving, FUD or nonexistent is a bit extreme. I think it's about time we let this bug rest in peace and continue the discussion in another more appropriate medium in case someone still has something to say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 521756] New: perl-Config-General-2.44 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Config-General-2.44 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521756 Summary: perl-Config-General-2.44 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Config-General AssignedTo: ville.sky...@iki.fi ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, ville.sky...@iki.fi Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.44 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.43 URL: http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Config/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.13, 1.14 perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec, 1.17, 1.18 sources, 1.13, 1.14
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv824
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Sep 08 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.40-1
- Upstream update.
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-11/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- .cvsignore 28 Feb 2009 02:16:29 - 1.13
+++ .cvsignore 8 Sep 2009 14:33:54 - 1.14
@@ -1 +1 @@
-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.38.tar.gz
+HTTP-Server-Simple-0.40.tar.gz
Index: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-11/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.17 -r1.18
--- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec28 Feb 2009 02:16:29 - 1.17
+++ perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec8 Sep 2009 14:33:54 - 1.18
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple
-Version:0.38
+Version:0.40
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Very simple standalone HTTP daemon
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Tue Sep 08 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.40-1
+- Upstream update.
+
* Sat Feb 28 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.38-1
- Upstream update.
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-11/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- sources 28 Feb 2009 02:16:29 - 1.13
+++ sources 8 Sep 2009 14:33:54 - 1.14
@@ -1 +1 @@
-318869b8668d949931a1499f4b2bcb81 HTTP-Server-Simple-0.38.tar.gz
+12d24449cf2d3f4c2216132e4c1fef65 HTTP-Server-Simple-0.40.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.13, 1.14 perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec, 1.16, 1.17 sources, 1.13, 1.14
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1449
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Sep 08 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.40-1
- Upstream update.
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- .cvsignore 28 Feb 2009 02:16:30 - 1.13
+++ .cvsignore 8 Sep 2009 14:35:31 - 1.14
@@ -1 +1 @@
-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.38.tar.gz
+HTTP-Server-Simple-0.40.tar.gz
Index: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-10/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.16 -r1.17
--- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec28 Feb 2009 02:16:30 - 1.16
+++ perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec8 Sep 2009 14:35:31 - 1.17
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple
-Version:0.38
+Version:0.40
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Very simple standalone HTTP daemon
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Tue Sep 08 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.40-1
+- Upstream update.
+
* Sat Feb 28 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.38-1
- Upstream update.
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- sources 28 Feb 2009 02:16:30 - 1.13
+++ sources 8 Sep 2009 14:35:31 - 1.14
@@ -1 +1 @@
-318869b8668d949931a1499f4b2bcb81 HTTP-Server-Simple-0.38.tar.gz
+12d24449cf2d3f4c2216132e4c1fef65 HTTP-Server-Simple-0.40.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/devel .cvsignore, 1.13, 1.14 perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec, 1.18, 1.19 sources, 1.13, 1.14
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32197
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Sep 08 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.40-1
- Upstream update.
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- .cvsignore 28 Feb 2009 02:16:29 - 1.13
+++ .cvsignore 8 Sep 2009 14:30:53 - 1.14
@@ -1 +1 @@
-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.38.tar.gz
+HTTP-Server-Simple-0.40.tar.gz
Index: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/devel/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19
--- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec26 Jul 2009 06:35:36 - 1.18
+++ perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec8 Sep 2009 14:30:53 - 1.19
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple
-Version:0.38
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.40
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Very simple standalone HTTP daemon
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Tue Sep 08 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.40-1
+- Upstream update.
+
* Sat Jul 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.38-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- sources 28 Feb 2009 02:16:29 - 1.13
+++ sources 8 Sep 2009 14:30:53 - 1.14
@@ -1 +1 @@
-318869b8668d949931a1499f4b2bcb81 HTTP-Server-Simple-0.38.tar.gz
+12d24449cf2d3f4c2216132e4c1fef65 HTTP-Server-Simple-0.40.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 520505] Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505 --- Comment #15 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2009-09-08 12:56:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) I take it you're retracting your claim? I don't know what you're referring to. This is nothing personal, and I haven't claimed you having done actual harm to Fedora; I simply don't know if you consistently follow this practice I find harmful and I'm not after anyone. Comment 4 *is* what I think and I'm not retracting that (note when done as a general packaging practice, and see also the 2nd paragraph of comment 8). But I'm done with this discussion here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-Config-General/devel .cvsignore, 1.13, 1.14 perl-Config-General.spec, 1.22, 1.23 sources, 1.13, 1.14
Author: scop
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Config-General/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18309
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Config-General.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Sep 8 2009 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.44-1
- Update to 2.44 (#521756).
- Prune pre-2005 %changelog entries.
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Config-General/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- .cvsignore 26 Jul 2009 16:14:19 - 1.13
+++ .cvsignore 8 Sep 2009 17:13:57 - 1.14
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Config-General-2.43.tar.gz
+Config-General-2.44.tar.gz
Index: perl-Config-General.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Config-General/devel/perl-Config-General.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -p -r1.22 -r1.23
--- perl-Config-General.spec26 Jul 2009 16:14:19 - 1.22
+++ perl-Config-General.spec8 Sep 2009 17:13:57 - 1.23
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Config-General
-Version:2.43
+Version:2.44
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Generic configuration module for Perl
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ support for object oriented access to th
%setup -q -n Config-General-%{version}
%patch0 -p1
rm -r t/Tie
-rm General/i # http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=48211
f=Changelog ; iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 -o $f.utf8 $f ; mv $f.utf8 $f
@@ -70,7 +69,11 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
-* Sun Jul 26 2009 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.43-1
+* Tue Sep 8 2009 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.44-1
+- Update to 2.44 (#521756).
+- Prune pre-2005 %%changelog entries.
+
+* Sun Jul 26 2009 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.43-1
- Update to 2.43 (#513796).
* Sat Jul 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 2.42-3
@@ -79,115 +82,50 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 2.42-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
-* Sun Jan 4 2009 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.42-1
+* Sun Jan 4 2009 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.42-1
- 2.42.
- Patch test suite to use system installed Tie::IxHash.
- Fix some spelling errors in %%description.
- Use Source0: instead of Source:.
-* Sat Jun 21 2008 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.40-1
+* Sat Jun 21 2008 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.40-1
- 2.40.
-* Tue Jun 17 2008 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.39-1
+* Tue Jun 17 2008 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.39-1
- 2.39.
-* Tue Mar 4 2008 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.38-1
+* Tue Mar 4 2008 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.38-1
- 2.38.
* Fri Feb 8 2008 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 2.37-2
- rebuild for new perl
-* Tue Nov 27 2007 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.37-1
+* Tue Nov 27 2007 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.37-1
- 2.37 (#398801).
- Convert docs to UTF-8.
-* Tue Aug 7 2007 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.33-2
+* Tue Aug 7 2007 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.33-2
- License: GPL+ or Artistic
-* Wed Apr 18 2007 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.33-1
+* Wed Apr 18 2007 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.33-1
- 2.33.
- BuildRequire perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) and perl(Test::More).
-* Sat Feb 24 2007 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.32-1
+* Sat Feb 24 2007 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.32-1
- 2.32.
-* Tue Aug 29 2006 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.31-2
+* Tue Aug 29 2006 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.31-2
- Fix order of arguments to find(1).
- Drop version from perl build dependency.
-* Thu Jan 12 2006 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.31-1
+* Thu Jan 12 2006 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.31-1
- 2.31.
-* Fri Sep 16 2005 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.30-1
+* Fri Sep 16 2005 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.30-1
- 2.30.
-* Wed May 18 2005 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 2.28-2
+* Wed May 18 2005 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 2.28-2
- 2.28.
* Fri Apr 7 2005 Michael Schwendt mschwendt[AT]users.sf.net - 2.27-2
- rebuilt
-
-* Fri Jun 18 2004 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 0:2.27-0.fdr.1
-- Update to 2.27.
-- Bring up to date with current fedora.us Perl spec template.
-
-* Sun May 9 2004 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 0:2.26-0.fdr.3
-- BuildRequire perl = 1:5.6.1-34.99.6 for support for vendor installdirs.
-- Use pure_install to avoid perllocal.pod workarounds.
-
-* Sun Apr 25 2004 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 0:2.26-0.fdr.2
-- Require perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_*).
-
-* Sun Mar 14 2004 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 0:2.26-0.fdr.1
-- Update to 2.26.
-
-* Mon Feb 2 2004 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 0:2.24-0.fdr.3
--
[Bug 521756] perl-Config-General-2.44 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521756 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.44-1 Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
