Mono.Cecil & monodevelop-debugger-mdb
Hi, MD-debugger-mdb is currently broken for rawhide. I've tried many ways to get it to build and have finally asked for help from the the md mailing list. The big problem is that we're using a system wide Mono.Cecil rather than individual packages having their own version of Mono.Cecil. Here's the conversation followed by a request from me... 8--> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Paul wrote: > I've got MD-2.2 installed from Fedora rawhide and am trying to build the > MD debugger plugin. Problem is that it's looking for Mono.Cecil in the > MD addins. > > With Fedora, we use a system wide Mono.Cecil instead of having a pile of > them around the place. We use a local copy of Cecil because Cecil API is (was?) not guaranteed to be stable and therefor the library is *supposed* to be bundled with apps. This also allows us to rely on the exact behaviour of the version we ship. By upgrading MD's Cecil to one it has not been tested with, Fedora is potentially exposing their users to bugs that we will be unable to reproduce and fix. See http://www.mono-project.com/Cecil#Using_Cecil <--8 Given this, should we change the approach we currently have for using the system wide Mono.Cecil and allow the likes of MD to ship with it's own version of Mono.Cecil? Mono.Cecil is not added into GAC so having different versions of Mono.Cecil for different applications should not cause conflicts. "Should" is being used in it's lightest sense! TTFN Paul P.S. Going off until Boxing Day now, so Merry Christmas to you all! -- Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: New covenant published
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 15:14:40 -0600, Sir Gallantmon wrote: > Then I guess we shouldn't have AJAX either, since Microsoft developed one of > the core technologies behind AJAX. And for the running foreign code on your machine adds extra risk above just running a complicated beast like a graphical web browser. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Kernel security update required or not?
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:33:23AM +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > According to this: http://lwn.net/Articles/367443/, latest kernel > updates have security fixes (the second one appears on the 2.6.31.9 > list). > > Is this something that has been backported to current F-12 kernels (I > don't see it in changelog), or do we need a security update for F-12 > here? > Sorry, I forgot to push it to bodhi after the build completed (blame ppc, it takes far too long.) They should be pushed now (with an extra fix to fuse.) In the future, if you want to ask such questions, fedora-kernel-list would be much more appropriate. I for one, don't have time to read fedora-devel-list often. regards, Kyle. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rawhide report: 20091224 changes
Compose started at Thu Dec 24 08:15:08 UTC 2009 Broken deps for i386 -- anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libevolution-mail-shared.so.0 anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libefilterbar.so.0 cluster-snmp-0.16.1-2.fc12.i686 requires libnetsnmp.so.15 ghc-GLUT-devel-2.1.1.2-2.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-GLUT-devel-2.1.1.2-2.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-GLUT-doc-2.1.1.2-2.fc12.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-GLUT-doc-2.1.1.2-2.fc12.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-GLUT-prof-2.1.1.2-2.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-HTTP-devel-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-HTTP-devel-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-HTTP-doc-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-HTTP-doc-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-HTTP-prof-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-OpenGL-devel-2.2.1.1-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-OpenGL-devel-2.2.1.1-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-OpenGL-doc-2.2.1.1-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-OpenGL-doc-2.2.1.1-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-OpenGL-prof-2.2.1.1-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-cairo-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-cairo-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-cairo-prof-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-cgi-devel-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-cgi-devel-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-cgi-doc-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-cgi-doc-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-cgi-prof-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-fgl-devel-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-fgl-devel-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-fgl-doc-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-fgl-doc-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-fgl-prof-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gconf-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gconf-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gconf-prof-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-ghc-paths-devel-0.1.0.5-8.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-ghc-paths-devel-0.1.0.5-8.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-ghc-paths-doc-0.1.0.5-8.fc12.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-ghc-paths-doc-0.1.0.5-8.fc12.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-ghc-paths-prof-0.1.0.5-8.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gio-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gio-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gio-prof-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-glade-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-glade-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-glade-prof-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-glib-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-glib-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-glib-prof-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gstreamer-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gstreamer-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gstreamer-prof-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gtk-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gtk-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gtk-prof-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gtkglext-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gtkglext-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gtkglext-prof-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gtksourceview2-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gtksourceview2-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-gtksourceview2-prof-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-haskell-platform-devel-2009.2.0.2-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-haskell-platform-devel-2009.2.0.2-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-haskell-platform-doc-2009.2.0.2-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-haskell-platform-doc-2009.2.0.2-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-haskell-platform-prof-2009.2.0.2-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4 ghc-haskell-src-exts-devel-1.3.0-2.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-haskell-src-exts-devel-1.3.0-2.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-haskell-src-exts-doc-1.3.0-2.fc13.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 ghc-haskell-src-exts-doc-1.3
Re: major ghc breakage: anybody working on fixing them? (was Re: rawhide report: 20091223 changes)
2009/12/23 Alex Lancaster : >> Rawhide Report writes: > > So these huge slew of broken deps (seems like more than 10 packages) for > ghc have been in the rawhide reports for over a week now, is anybody > actively maintaining and/or planning to fix these packages? If not, > please let us know so a provenpackager can fix these, they overwhelm the > rawhide log and make it more likely that people ignore the entire broken > dep log. It seems like it is only a version number in a subpackage that > needs building or somesuch, so hopefully it is trivial to fix. Sorry for making the noise. The biggest problem is that alot of libraries have been migrated out of the default compiler install and into many subpackages. All i can say is that we're working on it slowly. In short though, it's not a trivial fix. -Yaakov -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: dist-git proof of concept phase 2 ready for testing
ons 2009-12-23 klockan 14:32 -0800 skrev Jesse Keating: > I don't expect > that I'd have to go hunting down where the commit hash for the previous > build came from, then try to discover which branch that commit hash > currently lives on, so that I can commit on top of it and keep going. Automate it in fedpkg? "fedpkg checkout emacs F12 stable" or something. /abo -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
