[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477374, which changed state. Bug 477374 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-05 01:44:27 EDT --- The package is now updated to new guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.34,1.35
Author: cchance
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7128
Modified Files:
liberation-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Thu Feb 05 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-9.fc11
- Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies with reference of dejavu.
Index: liberation-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -r1.34 -r1.35
--- liberation-fonts.spec 4 Feb 2009 03:15:37 - 1.34
+++ liberation-fonts.spec 5 Feb 2009 03:14:57 - 1.35
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts
Version: 1.04.93
-Release: 8%{?dist}
+Release: 9%{?dist}
# The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two
# exceptions:
# The first exception is the standard FSF font exception.
@@ -21,12 +21,9 @@
URL: https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/
Source0: liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz
-Obsoletes:liberation-fonts-sans < 1.04.93-4
-Obsoletes:liberation-fonts-serif < 1.04.93-4
-Obsoletes:liberation-fonts-mono < 1.04.93-4
BuildRoot:%(mktemp -ud
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch:noarch
-Buildrequires:fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils
+BuildRequires:fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils
%description
%common_desc
@@ -38,8 +35,6 @@
Summary: Shared common files of Liberation font families.
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13
-Obsoletes:liberation-fonts >= 1.04.93-6
-Conflicts:liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7
%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
%common_desc
@@ -57,10 +52,10 @@
%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat
Summary: Compatibility files of Liberation font families.
Group:User Interface/X
-Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: %{fontname}-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: %{fontname}-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8
%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat
%common_desc
@@ -74,6 +69,9 @@
Summary: Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Conflicts:liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Obsoletes:liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Provides: liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
%common_desc
@@ -86,6 +84,9 @@
Summary: Serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Times New Roman
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Conflicts:liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Obsoletes:liberation-serif-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Provides: liberation-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
%description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
%common_desc
@@ -99,6 +100,9 @@
Summary: Monospace fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Courier New
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Conflicts:liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Obsoletes:liberation-mono-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Provides: liberation-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
%description -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts
%common_desc
@@ -130,6 +134,9 @@
rm -rf %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Thu Feb 05 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-9.fc11
+- Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies with reference of dejavu.
+
* Wed Feb 04 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-8.fc11
- Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:23:18 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1372 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:24:29 EDT --- allgeyer-fonts-5.002-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:25:38 EDT --- yum-3.2.21-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:20:50 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1341 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|UPSTREAM|NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:18:20 EDT --- yum-3.2.21-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:12:16 EDT --- allgeyer-fonts-5.002-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:13:17 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:14:05 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 --- Comment #3 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-04 16:55:53 EDT --- Ah, thanks! I'll submit for review an SRPM updated to today's standards when I am back from FOSDEM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 16:50:41 EDT --- Maybe Jeffrey or Jon can step in as co-maintainers since their packages depend on yours? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski 2009-02-04 16:37:57 EDT --- Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. I'm pretty busy at the moment, and this is low on my personal priority list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477473] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||477336 Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 16:29:05 EDT --- 1. For FreeMonoBold the case is clear-cut: just add a dep on the canonical package providing it and symlink it from there (but you probably want to wait till bug #477336 is resolved) 2. for tvtimeSansBold you need to split it in a subpackage that conforms to fonts packaging guidelines, and likewise make your main package depend on this subpackage and symlink the file from here (of course that's assuming the special icons are worth it) If you decide to drop the icons, the second subpackage is not necessary (we won't ship tvtimeSansBold at all) and you probably also want to think on replacing FreeMonoBold by DejaVu Sans Mono Bold which will already be installed on most user systems, bringing your download requirements even lower (so depend on dejavu-sans-mono-fonts and symlink from here) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_my_package_bundles_FreeSans.2C_Linux_Libertine.2C_Droid_or_Liberation_fonts.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||477473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 16:18:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > So far, the package names were as follows: > > SRPM: terminus-font > RPM: terminus-font-x11 > (X11 bitmap font set in normal/bold and several sizes) > RPM: terminus-font-console > (console bitmap font set in normal/bold and several character sets) > > The new rules say "Fedora font packages are named > [foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts, in lowercase". > > I can't see any foundry, foundry is just a shorthand for upstream, if an upstream releases several fonts so they are clearly grouped together. It is optional > upstream[1]'s project name is "Terminus Font - a clean > fixed width font", I don't see a special "fontfamilyname", Font family name is nothing special that's how your font calls itself in GUI font lists. You can't have a font file without a familyname or apps would not know how to refer to it. > so my package would > need to be called "terminus-font-fonts"? "When foundryname, projectname or fontfamilyname contain the font or fonts affix, this affix should be dropped from them" Don't panic and just read attentively http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Clarifications you'll see this kind of case is covered > Changing from old "terminus-font" to "terminus-fonts" with a trailing s could > sound better and be less redundant and confusing. > > Presuming I have eventually worked out the proper name to call the SRPM, I > will > call the package containing the X11 font files the same, after the > [foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme. This is ok > But what happens with the console fonts? Console fonts can't be processed by fontconfig so they're not a "font" covered by the guidelines and you can name the subpackage that contains them whatever you want, as long as it's not some form of foo-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ta...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 16:09:12 EDT --- I'd have used vl-gothic not vlgothic but your choice is ok too. Upgrade paths work and the package looks sane. (catalogue is probably leftover cruft since you don't use it, and checking the package is ok would be easier if you used the same line order as the template, but that does not change the result) ☾☾☾ APPROVED ☾☾☾ Please do not forget to update comps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 484109] liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484109 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 15:43:57 EDT --- Yes, the latest liberation rawhide package releases are "strange" I'll probably won't be able to find the time soonish to try to understand them. Caius: how about you just follow the templates strictly, taking inspiration from how mgopen (or dejavu, or vera...) obsoleted cleanly their old monolithic fonts package, instead of trying to come up with a new obsoletion pattern? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 484109] New: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484109 Summary: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: ccha...@redhat.com ReportedBy: mic...@harddata.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: ccha...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Before an update there were installed liberation-fonts-1.04.93-6.fc11 and liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-6.fc11. The current update "obsoleted" liberation-fonts and "replaced" it with liberation-fonts-common. In yum.log: Feb 04 12:55:50 Installed: liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-8.fc11.noarch Feb 04 12:58:20 Erased: liberation-fonts Only there are no actual fonts after these operations. It appears that the idea was to replace those with 'liberation-fonts-compat' package. A typo in specs? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts-1.04.93-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #18 from Bill Nottingham 2009-02-04 14:19:05 EDT --- As the package maintainer, you can do that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.152,1.153
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11718
Modified Files:
pango.spec
Log Message:
* Wed Feb 4 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.23.0-2
- Move pango-view from pango-devel to pango
Index: pango.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.152
retrieving revision 1.153
diff -u -r1.152 -r1.153
--- pango.spec 3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 - 1.152
+++ pango.spec 4 Feb 2009 19:07:24 - 1.153
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
Name: pango
Version: 1.23.0
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.23/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@
%doc pango-view/HELLO.txt
%{_libdir}/libpango*-*.so.*
%{_bindir}/pango-querymodules*
+%{_bindir}/pango-view
%{_libdir}/pango
%doc %{_mandir}/man1/*
@@ -219,11 +220,13 @@
%{_libdir}/libpango*.so
%{_includedir}/*
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*
-%{_bindir}/pango-view
%doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/pango
%changelog
+* Wed Feb 4 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.23.0-2
+- Move pango-view from pango-devel to pango
+
* Tue Feb 3 2009 Matthias Clasen - 1.23.0-1
- Update to 1.23.0
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482
Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag||needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l
||aposte.net)
--- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann
2009-02-04 10:27:47 EDT ---
So far, the package names were as follows:
SRPM: terminus-font
RPM: terminus-font-x11
(X11 bitmap font set in normal/bold and several sizes)
RPM: terminus-font-console
(console bitmap font set in normal/bold and several character sets)
The new rules say "Fedora font packages are named
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts, in lowercase".
I can't see any foundry, upstream[1]'s project name is "Terminus Font - a clean
fixed width font", I don't see a special "fontfamilyname", so my package would
need to be called "terminus-font-fonts"?
Changing from old "terminus-font" to "terminus-fonts" with a trailing s could
sound better and be less redundant and confusing.
Presuming I have eventually worked out the proper name to call the SRPM, I will
call the package containing the X11 font files the same, after the
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme.
But what happens with the console fonts? %{name}-console would violate the
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme. Or are all the
"fonts" rules only applying to X11 fonts anyway and there are no rules for
console fonts? I could do a "-n terminus-font-console" to keep the old package
name in the latter case.
Anyway, I'd really like to build the package with the console fonts in the same
source package if possible.
[1] http://www.is-vn.bg/hamster/
(Partly) related bugs:
bug 477433: nted's "convert to new font pkg guidelines" bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433#c5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433#c7
bug 483589: current terminus-font-x11's registering of the X11 fonts broken
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589#c0
If any part of this is better discussed on fedora-fonts-list, feel free to do
so. I am subscribed there.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 483589] terminus-font-x11 unusable on F-10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-04 10:20:30 EDT --- As I am now actually using F-10 on a day-to-day basis, I will be able to fix this issue. This might not be fixed in this (old) "terminus-font" package, though, as the package needs to be renamed to fit in with Fedora's new guidelines on naming and packaging fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #14 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-04 08:49:11 EDT --- Ok, I see. Filed a package review for renaming. Bug#484042. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-04 03:31:11 EDT --- built it for rawhide with update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477473] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 Tomas Smetana changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l ||aposte.net) --- Comment #4 from Tomas Smetana 2009-02-04 03:25:10 EDT --- Tvtime contains two fonts: FreeMonoBold and tvtimeSansBold. They're both originate from the GNU FreeFont collection -- FreeMonoBold can be replaced by the one we have in freefont package. The problem is with tvtimeSansBold which is FreeSansBold with additional glyphs used as "icons" in the OSD menus. I'm not sure how to solve this issue properly...: - Create tvtime fonts subpackage with the two fonts placed somewhere in /usr/share/fonts which would have zero impact on the tvtime and its users but the FreeMonoBold may happen to be installed twice - Make tvtime depend on the freefont package and use both fonts from there, which would mean that the OSD would not look so fancy (no big change in usability though) and the user would have to install rather big font package - Make tvtime depend on the freefont package but use only FreeMonoBold from there and then either: a) have tvtimeSansBold packaged spearately b) have tvtimeSansBold packaged with tvtime ad a) This solution makes little sense to me: the tvtimeSansBold has no value for any application but tvtime and still the user would have to install 3.5 MB freefont package ad b) The user would have to install 3.5 MB additional fonts but FreeMonoBold would be packaged just once and tvtime would carry its specific font with it. Which way should I prefer? Could you please give me some advice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/samyak-fonts/devel samyak-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Author: pravins
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20471
Modified Files:
samyak-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Wed Feb 04 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-4
- renamed samyak-common-fonts to samyak-fonts-common
Index: samyak-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel/samyak-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- samyak-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2009 09:34:58 - 1.7
+++ samyak-fonts.spec 4 Feb 2009 08:16:22 - 1.8
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version: 1.2.1
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
Summary: Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts
Group: User Interface/X
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
@@ -21,19 +21,19 @@
%description
%common_desc
-%package -n %{fontname}-common-fonts
+%package common
Summary: Common files for smc-fonts
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
-Provides: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
-Obsoletes: %{name}-common < 1.2.1-3
-%description -n %{fontname}-common-fonts
+Provides: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: %{fontname}-common-fonts < 1.2.1-4
+%description common
%common_desc
%package -n %{fontname}-devanagari-fonts
Summary: Open Type Fonts for Devanagari script
Group: User Interface/X
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
Provides: %{name}-devanagari = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-devanagari < 1.2.1-3
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
%package -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts
Summary: Open Type Fonts for Tamil script
Group: User Interface/X
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
Provides: %{name}-tamil = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-tamil < 1.2.1-3
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
%package -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts
Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
Group: User Interface/X
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
Provides: %{name}-malayalam = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-malayalam < 1.2.1-3
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
%package -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts
Summary: Open Type Fonts for Gujarai script
Group: User Interface/X
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
Provides: %{name}-gujarati = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-gujarati < 1.2.1-3
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
%package -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts
Summary: Open Type Fonts for Oriya script
Group: User Interface/X
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
Provides: %{name}-oriya = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-oriya < 1.2.1-3
@@ -115,12 +115,15 @@
rm -fr %{buildroot}
-%files -n %{fontname}-common-fonts
+%files common
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc COPYING README AUTHORS
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
+* Wed Feb 04 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-4
+- renamed samyak-common-fonts to samyak-fonts-common
+
* Tue Feb 03 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-3
- renamed font package as per fedora new Font_package_naming guideline
- updated spec
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
