Alpha platform support for kernel package (WAS: Re: [pkgdb] kernel: oliver has requested commit)
Hi! Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-( And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it? Kyle McMartin wrote: [ ... ] This all looks fine to me. May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-) > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on stuff, and not just someone asking for random commit access. Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you where worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react differently. I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace for patches, I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts? Whatever you prefer. Let me know, so I start working on this today... Best, Oliver ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: Alpha platform support for kernel package (WAS: Re: [pkgdb] kernel: oliver has requested commit)
Oliver Falk wrote: Hi! Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-( And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it? Kyle McMartin wrote: [ ... ] This all looks fine to me. May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-) > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on stuff, and not just someone asking for random commit access. Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you where worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react differently. I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace for patches, I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts? Whatever you prefer. Let me know, so I start working on this today... Ping? -of ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: Alpha platform support for kernel package (WAS: Re: [pkgdb] kernel: oliver has requested commit)
Oliver Falk wrote: Hi! Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-( And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it? Kyle McMartin wrote: [ ... ] This all looks fine to me. May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-) > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on stuff, and not just someone asking for random commit access. Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you where worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react differently. I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace for patches, I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts? Whatever you prefer. Let me know, so I start working on this today... Did I miss the answer to my mail!? -of ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: Alpha platform support for kernel package (WAS: Re: [pkgdb] kernel: oliver has requested commit)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:52:44AM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: > Oliver Falk wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-( > > And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it? > > > > Kyle McMartin wrote: > > [ ... ] > >> This all looks fine to me. > > > > May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-) > > > > > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly > >> new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on stuff, and > >> not just someone asking for random commit access. > > > > Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you where > > worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react differently. > > > >> I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace for patches, > >> I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts? > > > > Whatever you prefer. > > > > Let me know, so I start working on this today... > > Did I miss the answer to my mail!? Sorry, I was on vacation, and it fell off my radar when I got back. Looked ok to commit to me though iirc. I've no really preference on patch naming. If you want to do alpha-*, go ahead. but don't feel that you have to. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: Alpha platform support for kernel package (WAS: Re: [pkgdb] kernel: oliver has requested commit)
Dave Jones wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:52:44AM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: > Oliver Falk wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-( > > And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it? > > > > Kyle McMartin wrote: > > [ ... ] > >> This all looks fine to me. > > > > May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-) > > > > > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly > >> new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on stuff, and > >> not just someone asking for random commit access. > > > > Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you where > > worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react differently. > > > >> I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace for patches, > >> I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts? > > > > Whatever you prefer. > > > > Let me know, so I start working on this today... > > Did I miss the answer to my mail!? Sorry, I was on vacation, and it fell off my radar when I got back. Looked ok to commit to me though iirc. I've no really preference on patch naming. If you want to do alpha-*, go ahead. but don't feel that you have to. OK. I'll commit the changes in a clean way, add CL, etc. We can still move the patches and use other names. Or any other change that might be necessary... Best, Oliver ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: Alpha platform support for kernel package (WAS: Re: [pkgdb] kernel: oliver has requested commit)
Oliver Falk wrote: Dave Jones wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:52:44AM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: > Oliver Falk wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-( > > And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it? > > > > Kyle McMartin wrote: > > [ ... ] > >> This all looks fine to me. > > > > May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-) > > > > > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly > >> new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on stuff, and > >> not just someone asking for random commit access. > > > > Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you where > > worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react differently. > > > >> I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace for patches, > >> I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts? > > > > Whatever you prefer. > > > > Let me know, so I start working on this today... > > Did I miss the answer to my mail!? Sorry, I was on vacation, and it fell off my radar when I got back. Looked ok to commit to me though iirc. I've no really preference on patch naming. If you want to do alpha-*, go ahead. but don't feel that you have to. OK. I'll commit the changes in a clean way, add CL, etc. We can still move the patches and use other names. Or any other change that might be necessary... I've clean up my changes and finally commited them (F-9 only). Plz have a look at it and if it's fine for you, I go on with F-10. Best, Oliver ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: Alpha platform support for kernel package (WAS: Re: [pkgdb] kernel: oliver has requested commit)
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 01:59:14PM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: > Oliver Falk wrote: >> Dave Jones wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:52:44AM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: >>> > Oliver Falk wrote: >>> > > Hi! >>> > > > > Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-( >>> > > And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it? >>> > > > > Kyle McMartin wrote: >>> > > [ ... ] >>> > >> This all looks fine to me. >>> > > > > May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-) >>> > > > > > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly >>> > >> new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on >>> stuff, and >>> > >> not just someone asking for random commit access. >>> > > > > Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you >>> where > > worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react >>> differently. >>> > > > >> I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace >>> for patches, >>> > >> I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts? >>> > > > > Whatever you prefer. >>> > > > > Let me know, so I start working on this today... >>> > > Did I miss the answer to my mail!? >>> >>> Sorry, I was on vacation, and it fell off my radar when I got back. >>> Looked ok to commit to me though iirc. >>> >>> I've no really preference on patch naming. If you want to do alpha-*, >>> go ahead. >>> but don't feel that you have to. >> >> OK. I'll commit the changes in a clean way, add CL, etc. >> >> We can still move the patches and use other names. Or any other change >> that might be necessary... > > I've clean up my changes and finally commited them (F-9 only). Plz have > a look at it and if it's fine for you, I go on with F-10. Looks like you committed them to CVS HEAD. The F-9 kernels are being built from a CVS branch (which is how they are still on 2.6.27). Is that what you intended? josh ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: Alpha platform support for kernel package (WAS: Re: [pkgdb] kernel: oliver has requested commit)
Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 01:59:14PM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: Oliver Falk wrote: Dave Jones wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:52:44AM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: > Oliver Falk wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-( > > And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it? > > > > Kyle McMartin wrote: > > [ ... ] > >> This all looks fine to me. > > > > May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-) > > > > > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly > >> new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on stuff, and > >> not just someone asking for random commit access. > > > > Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you where > > worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react differently. > > > >> I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace for patches, > >> I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts? > > > > Whatever you prefer. > > > > Let me know, so I start working on this today... > > Did I miss the answer to my mail!? Sorry, I was on vacation, and it fell off my radar when I got back. Looked ok to commit to me though iirc. I've no really preference on patch naming. If you want to do alpha-*, go ahead. but don't feel that you have to. OK. I'll commit the changes in a clean way, add CL, etc. We can still move the patches and use other names. Or any other change that might be necessary... I've clean up my changes and finally commited them (F-9 only). Plz have a look at it and if it's fine for you, I go on with F-10. Looks like you committed them to CVS HEAD. The F-9 kernels are being built from a CVS branch (which is how they are still on 2.6.27). Is that what you intended? I didn't want to do it directly in private-fedora-9-2_6_27-branch with my first shot. I hope that's OK with? This way it's in CVS and I can build from it for testing. Now that I've seen it builds fine, I can go on and approach the 'real' tag... -of ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: Alpha platform support for kernel package (WAS: Re: [pkgdb] kernel: oliver has requested commit)
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 04:11:37PM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: > I didn't want to do it directly in private-fedora-9-2_6_27-branch with > my first shot. I hope that's OK with? This way it's in CVS and I can > build from it for testing. Now that I've seen it builds fine, I can go > on and approach the 'real' tag... > Sure, sounds good to me. cheers, Kyle ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
