[Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-03 04:22:05 EDT --- Ideally, one per font family. It's not an obligation yet, but the obligation text is already in FPC's queue. But do check with upstream the font origin and licensing. It may be they're not all licensed in a Fedora-compatible way, or that they're already packaged somewhere else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-03 04:23:38 EDT --- See also https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2008-December/msg00020.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.mail...@laposte.net --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-03 04:27:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) GPLv2+ is a bad license for fonts in Fedora. True. Nevertheless currently we do accept GPL-only fonts in Fedora, as long as their packagers continue to try to locate right holders and add the FSF Font exception to the license. There are just too many GPL-only fonts :( Just don't use them to create PDFs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-03 04:42:22 EDT --- It's worth a try. You could also remind upstream to add fontconfig support so it can auto-discover system fonts like other apps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477422] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 Balint Cristian re...@rdsor.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477422, which changed state. Bug 477422 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478695] New: Firefox crashes in pango-hangul-fc.so
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Firefox crashes in pango-hangul-fc.so https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478695 Summary: Firefox crashes in pango-hangul-fc.so Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: mc...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=328111) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328111) Backtrace from crashed firefox Description of problem: When running wikipedia search in Ctrl-K query dialog in Firefox, firefox crashed with the attached backtrace. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): firefox-3.0.5-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 xulrunner-1.9.0.5-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: happened once -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Re: Outage Notification - 2009-01-03 04:16 UTC
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: There is a current unscheduled outage starting at 2009-01-03 UTC, which will last for an unknown amount of time. Should be over now, tech replaced mobo and we're back in business. Happy new year all! -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
calling out for a sponsor
Hello list, im shouting out for a sponsor, is someone willing to sponsor me? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, / with kind regards, Sascha Thomas Spreitzer http://spreitzer.name/ ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: calling out for a sponsor
On 2009-01-03 10:29:18 PM, Sascha Thomas Spreitzer wrote: im shouting out for a sponsor, is someone willing to sponsor me? Hey, what type of things are you interested in working on (as in, what groups are you looking for sponsors for)? Thanks, Ricky pgpI0yml9d2n4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Disk IO issues
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 02:42:27PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: Lets pool some knowledge together because at this point, I'm missing something. I've been doing all measurements with sar as bonnie, etc, causes builds to timeout. Problem: We're seeing slower then normal disk IO. At least I think we are. This is a PERC5/E and MD1000 array. When I try to do a normal copy cp -adv /mnt/koji/packages /tmp/ I get around 4-6MBytes/s That's sucky. When I do a cp of a large file cp /mnt/koji/out /tmp/ I get 30-40MBytes/s. If I cat /dev/sde /dev/null I get between 225-300MBytes/s read. That's about what I would expect for straight block reads. The above tests are pretty consistent. /dev/sde is a raid5 array, hardware raid. Remember, RAID 5's worst performance is for writes. In your 14-drive array, it has to calculate parity across all the drives, then write the data across all the drives. As long as it's pure writes (e.g. not read/modify/write) it's not so bad, but still slower than you might think. What ext3 journaling options are enabled (e.g. what does 'mount' say)? If it's data=ordered (the default), that's OK. If it's data=journal, then all the data gets written twice (first to the journal, then the journal to the disk), which is really really slow, and the size of the journal would really make a difference too. RAID controllers also tend to benefit from using the noop scheduler, which effectively defers the scheduling to the RAID controller. Note that cp doesn't fdatasync(), so the I/Os will be scheduled, but not necessarily completed, when cp returns. Which might make your numbers even more optimistic than they really are. :-( -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Disk IO issues
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 06:32:38PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: What ext3 journaling options are enabled (e.g. what does 'mount' say)? If it's data=ordered (the default), that's OK. If it's data=journal, then all the data gets written twice (first to the journal, then the journal to the disk), which is really really slow, and the size of the journal would really make a difference too. For an NFS server (assuming that you aren't exporting as async) data=journal can give you better performance than anything else actually. The NFS howto has a brief note in the performance section about this. Kostas ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Disk IO issues
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 03:02:55AM +, Kostas Georgiou wrote: On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 06:32:38PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: What ext3 journaling options are enabled (e.g. what does 'mount' say)? If it's data=ordered (the default), that's OK. If it's data=journal, then all the data gets written twice (first to the journal, then the journal to the disk), which is really really slow, and the size of the journal would really make a difference too. For an NFS server (assuming that you aren't exporting as async) data=journal can give you better performance than anything else actually. The NFS howto has a brief note in the performance section about this. Yes, if the slowness is seen by applications on the client side of the NFS server, data=journal on the NFS server can help. Mike, your tests were all on the local file system, not across an NFS connection, right? data=journal can only buffer up to the size of the journal. Given the comments about speed with large files, unless the journal is specifically tuned to be large enough to handle them, no dice. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10 and Pulseaudio
Replying to myself as I found something out... 2008/12/11 Niels Weber nathelb...@gmail.com: So it seems that Pulseaudio is working after all... now I need only to find out how to get surround sound. After looking into the PulseAudio FAQ, that was quite easy: http://www.pulseaudio.org/wiki/FAQ#IhaveasurroundsoundcardbutPulseAudiousesjustthefrontspeakers To enable all the channels, edit /etc/pulse/daemon.conf: uncomment the default-sample-channels line (i.e. remove the semicolon from the beginning of the line) and set the value to 6 if you have a 5.1 setup, or 8 if you have 7.1 setup etc. After doing the edit, restart pulseaudio. That was all. Really easy compared to what I had to do back then to get surround working with alsa alone on one of the older Fedoras (which took me weeks). Now, surround works even in Prey - which it didn't with my previous setup (without PA under F8). Niels -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Jackd Problems -- alsa_pcm: xrun of at least 1227061150613.504 msecs
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan jonr...@pacbell.netwrote: On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 18:49 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan jonr...@pacbell.net wrote: In the past I've never had any problems running jackd. Now I'm getting a very large number of messages reading: alsa_pcm: xrun of at least 1227061150613.504 msecs I'm running F9 on an x86_64 system with all updates installed. Pulseaudio is not running. Jackd is started via qjackctl. No past problems with audio beyond the usual conflicts between pulseaudio and firefox. Questions: (1) What exactly does this message mean? An xrun is a buffer under- or over-run -- but what does the time interval represent? (2) Whatever the time interval means, it looks rather large. 1227061150613.504 msec is many days (or maybe years if msec means millisec and not microsec) This looks like a misconfiguration of some kind or a missing component. Any idea what it might be? The solution depends on your card (I have an Intel onboard card). But this material may give you an idea on what you can try: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/alsa-1.0.15rc2_snd-hda-intel.html#jackhttp://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/alsa-1.0.15rc2_snd-hda-intel.html#jack Thanks for the very useful pointer. Now I am stuck on what ought to be a very simple problem: What options can be given to my own driver (or generally any alsa driver)? My own driver appears to be snd_intel8x0, which is documented at http://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Matrix:Module-intel8x0 Unfortunately the parm:s (supposing these the possible arguments to an option statement in modules.conf) don't seem to include all possible options to be applied to this module. Sorry for being so dense - jon modinfo snd_intel8x0 -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X locks up after a random time
On Saturday 03 January 2009 01:36:01 Rex Dieter wrote: Marko Vojinovic wrote: Ok, this is a Fujitsu Siemens Esprimo U9200, with Intel graphics, F10 64bit, updated last week. KDE desktop, compiz and all, but I believe it is not related. Interesting, I'd noticed the same thing over the past few days... hmm (Dell Latitude D620 here). In the meantime, I've tried backing down to using kernel-2.6.27.7-134.fc10 (from kernel-2.6.27.9-159.fc10) to see if that makes any difference. This Mandriva laptop has a variation on that. With Desktop Effects on I get random freezes, but I also get times when the mouse can move the cursor around, but neither mouse-clicks or keyboard usage is registered. This has happened throughout, so I don't think that it's kernel-specific, but I do think that it is probably related to what you are both seeing. Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
On ven, 2009-01-02 at 16:26 -0400, Armin wrote: Guys, for god's sake, this thread is really starting to walk on my nerves. Have you guys ever tried 4.2 beta 2? And plus, if you love evolution, why not just use gnome. KMail in my opinion is way better and easier to configure that evolution and kde apps just make sense, and that is why I chose KDE. I use KDE from official repos for Fedora 9. I don't have time to install and test the 4.2beta2 version, because I don't have skills to do it. I don't work very well with desktops. I prefere KDE only because I ever used it. Maybe I will like Gnome if I will start to use it. Changing from kde3 to kde4 maybe could be the right moment to switch to gnome, because kde4 is very different from the kde3 but I will stay on KDE. If I love evolution can I use it on KDE? I used it on KDE for years, why I have to switch to gnome now? And if I love gimp, I have to switch to gnome? And if after I love ktorrent or sone k* I have to switch to KDE? So, it's better to have 2 desktop session and switch from one to the other simply clicking ctrl-alt-F6 and clicking ctrl-alt-F7 for example? I don't understand this approach... I like linux because it permit me to choise between desktops, between application. Now I think that this is not so true like in the past. Plus, it's very good if you guys appreciate the work of KDE devs. They have *re-written* most of KDE, and with great change comes great problems. Use it, love it, adore it, and report it, and help it. :) If you don't have coding skills, help with the artwork, bug reports, documentation, etc. etc. and if you do have coding skills, fix the bugs. It's that easy! I'm involved in some other QA on the open source, so I know that this is a good approach to the problem, but before to open a bug I will know if I'm the only one that has the problem, or is a choice. On top of all, I can do things now that I have never been able to do in KDE 3.x. That's true, but you can't do things that you done in the past Happy new year :) Happy new year to you too Bye Ambrogio -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Help... Can't boot!
I was using Fedora Core 6, just fine, but decided since it was so out of date, that I'd upgrade to Fedora 10. Now, for some reason, it won't boot. It keeps saying Unknown Partition Type 0x5. This is the same *exact* system that was working with Core 6, all I did was install over the old version (except for /home and a storage partition.) I'm using X86_64 where before I was using i386, but that shouldn't matter, should it? All data drives are IDE/PATA, but I'm installing off a SATA DVD ROM. HELP!!! I need to get this up and running as it's my primary desktop machine. I am stuck using my wife's XP box until I can get it back up and running! :-( -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help... Can't boot!
On 03/01/09 11:10, John Aldrich wrote: I was using Fedora Core 6, just fine, but decided since it was so out of date, that I'd upgrade to Fedora 10. Now, for some reason, it won't boot. It keeps saying Unknown Partition Type 0x5. At which point does it say that? Do you get as far as the grub menu? Partition type 0x5 is an 'Extended' partition. (/dev/sda4 or equivalent, usually) - this suggests to me that your grub.conf is incorrect, probably containing a line similar to root (hd0,3) But you can see this (I hope) by hitting 'e' at boot time, assuming you get as far as the grub countdown/menu. How many disks do you have in the box and what's your partitioning scheme? This is the same *exact* system that was working with Core 6, all I did was install over the old version (except for /home and a storage partition.) I'm using X86_64 where before I was using i386, but that shouldn't matter, should it? nope All data drives are IDE/PATA, but I'm installing off a SATA DVD ROM. okay, how many are there? And which one do you want to boot from? HELP!!! I need to get this up and running as it's my primary desktop machine. I am stuck using my wife's XP box until I can get it back up and running! :-( Stuart -- Stuart Sears RHCA etc. It's today! said Piglet. My favourite day, said Pooh. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
On Saturday 03 January 2009 10:52:40 Ambrogio wrote: On ven, 2009-01-02 at 16:26 -0400, Armin wrote: If I love evolution can I use it on KDE? I used it on KDE for years, why I have to switch to gnome now? And if I love gimp, I have to switch to gnome? And if after I love ktorrent or sone k* I have to switch to KDE? So, it's better to have 2 desktop session and switch from one to the other simply clicking ctrl-alt-F6 and clicking ctrl-alt-F7 for example? I don't understand this approach... I like linux because it permit me to choise between desktops, between application. Now I think that this is not so true like in the past. Hi, Ambrogio. You really don't have to switch to gnome to use evolution or gimp, or any other application (nor would you have to switch to kde if you were running in gnome and wanted to run a kde application). Installing the application you want will pull in any necessary libraries, and the application will run on either desktop. I do use some gnome applications on my kde desktop. Plus, it's very good if you guys appreciate the work of KDE devs. They have *re-written* most of KDE, and with great change comes great problems. Use it, love it, adore it, and report it, and help it. :) If you don't have coding skills, help with the artwork, bug reports, documentation, etc. etc. and if you do have coding skills, fix the bugs. It's that easy! I'm involved in some other QA on the open source, so I know that this is a good approach to the problem, but before to open a bug I will know if I'm the only one that has the problem, or is a choice. Agreed - I also prefer to check whether others experience a problem, since if I'm the only one experiencing it, it's likely to be my configuration that's at fault. On top of all, I can do things now that I have never been able to do in KDE 3.x. That's true, but you can't do things that you done in the past A few, but not many now. The problem is that some of the things are done differently, so if there are particular things that you miss, do ask. We may be able to tell you how to do it, and if not, we may be able to tell you whether it is work-in-progress. Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
X with neither KDE nor Gnome
I am experimenting with various niche window managers. I have removed all KDE software and XFCE still runs ok. Can I also delete all of gnome software without impacting XFCE? Usually I run only Xterm and Firefox. Thanks. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
F10 and encrypted partitions - positive outcome
One thing that has not been discussed on this forum for a while is the issue of the handling of encrypted partitions in F10. I have an old test laptop that had previously been installed with F9 with encrypted swap, /, and /opt partitions and an unencrypted /boot partition. I ran a clean F10 install and asked the installer to reformat the swap, root and /opt partitions, which it did. The nice surprise was that on firstboot the system asked me to enter the luks passphrase for the root partition and seemed to have stored the passphrases for the other partitions within the root partition so only a single passphrase was requested. This is excellent and means that booting the fully encrypted system is now very user friendly. This makes usability (user friendliness) excellent - so congrats to the developers for getting this right in F10. I have not tried suspending that machine so I don't know if coming back from suspend actually works for this machine but at least booting works nicely now. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/F10-and-encrypted-partitions---positive-outcome-tp21264150p21264150.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
On sab, 2009-01-03 at 11:25 +, Anne Wilson wrote: Hi, Ambrogio. You really don't have to switch to gnome to use evolution or gimp, or any other application (nor would you have to switch to kde if you were running in gnome and wanted to run a kde application). Installing the application you want will pull in any necessary libraries, and the application will run on either desktop. I do use some gnome applications on my kde desktop. Yes, I know that. My mail was only a provocation :-) About interation and integration of desktops and applications, I have a lot of problems. For example, I'm Italian and I like in most cases that applications localized work well. But, if I start gnome and I launch evolution and gimp (that are 2 applications that I use very often) menus are in italian. If I start KDE and use the KDE apps, they are in Italian, but evolution and gnome are in english. I was unable to obtain the italian menu. Apps depend on desktop configuration, so using of the environment vars wasn't usefull. Agreed - I also prefer to check whether others experience a problem, since if I'm the only one experiencing it, it's likely to be my configuration that's at fault. I think this is the right approach, and also read and check other similar bugs or help request. A few, but not many now. The problem is that some of the things are done differently, so if there are particular things that you miss, do ask. We may be able to tell you how to do it, and if not, we may be able to tell you whether it is work-in-progress. I know that there are everytime things that are work-in-progress, and other that are impossible. I need everytime the last one :-) Bye -- Ambrogio De Lorenzo Professional Services Manager EMC Proven Specialist Tel:+39 340 1832924 Fax:+39 02 700430148 Email: ambrogio.delore...@gdit.it ICQ:161962491 Linux User #389536 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help... Can't boot!
Quoting Stuart stu...@sjsears.com: At which point does it say that? Do you get as far as the grub menu? Yes. It gets that far, and when I select that, it gives me the error. Even if I go as far as editing it to try and get into single mode. Partition type 0x5 is an 'Extended' partition. (/dev/sda4 or equivalent, usually) - this suggests to me that your grub.conf is incorrect, probably containing a line similar to root (hd0,3) Ahh... that would explain it. But you can see this (I hope) by hitting 'e' at boot time, assuming you get as far as the grub countdown/menu. How many disks do you have in the box and what's your partitioning scheme? Err... Three drives, one of which is on a Promise PATA controller (my motherboard only had one PATA controller.) /dev/sdb1 is /boot /dev/sdb2 is / /dev/sdb5 is /usr/local /dev/sda6 is /home /dev/sdc5 is an old /home (I think...not sure if that's my /home from FC6 or if sda6 is, so I'm not going to format it.) I am not formatting /dev/sda6 or /dev/sdc5. I am formatting everything else. I'm in the middle of reinstalling for the third or fourth time. Once it barfs again, I'll let you know exactly what the grub line says. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help... Can't boot!
Quoting Stuart stu...@sjsears.com: [snip] okay, how many are there? And which one do you want to boot from? According to the installer, it's going to write the boot info to /dev/sda. Boot is /dev/sdb1. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
I use KDE too. Regards, Michael Leung www.michaelleung.info http://diary.skynovel.info On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Ambrogio fn050...@interfree.it wrote: On sab, 2009-01-03 at 11:25 +, Anne Wilson wrote: Hi, Ambrogio. You really don't have to switch to gnome to use evolution or gimp, or any other application (nor would you have to switch to kde if you were running in gnome and wanted to run a kde application). Installing the application you want will pull in any necessary libraries, and the application will run on either desktop. I do use some gnome applications on my kde desktop. Yes, I know that. My mail was only a provocation :-) About interation and integration of desktops and applications, I have a lot of problems. For example, I'm Italian and I like in most cases that applications localized work well. But, if I start gnome and I launch evolution and gimp (that are 2 applications that I use very often) menus are in italian. If I start KDE and use the KDE apps, they are in Italian, but evolution and gnome are in english. I was unable to obtain the italian menu. Apps depend on desktop configuration, so using of the environment vars wasn't usefull. Agreed - I also prefer to check whether others experience a problem, since if I'm the only one experiencing it, it's likely to be my configuration that's at fault. I think this is the right approach, and also read and check other similar bugs or help request. A few, but not many now. The problem is that some of the things are done differently, so if there are particular things that you miss, do ask. We may be able to tell you how to do it, and if not, we may be able to tell you whether it is work-in-progress. I know that there are everytime things that are work-in-progress, and other that are impossible. I need everytime the last one :-) Bye -- Ambrogio De Lorenzo Professional Services Manager EMC Proven Specialist Tel:+39 340 1832924 Fax:+39 02 700430148 Email: ambrogio.delore...@gdit.it ICQ:161962491 Linux User #389536 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Regards, Michael Leung http://www.itblogs.info http://www.michaelleung.info -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
On Saturday 03 January 2009 11:44:30 Ambrogio wrote: For example, I'm Italian and I like in most cases that applications localized work well. But, if I start gnome and I launch evolution and gimp (that are 2 applications that I use very often) menus are in italian. If I start KDE and use the KDE apps, they are in Italian, but evolution and gnome are in english. I was unable to obtain the italian menu. Apps depend on desktop configuration, so using of the environment vars wasn't usefull. I can see that that's a problem :-) I'm sure it must be possible to do something about this, but it's a specialist area. I wonder if Kevin Koffler can help? I feel that there must be specialist lists for handling language problems. I'd be inclined to try asking on kde-i18n-it - https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-i18n-it Although the main focus is on translation they may well be able to tell you what you need to do to get the languages correctly aligned. HTH Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
ASROCK 4CoreDual-SATA2 and Fedora FC9 or FC10
Hello and happy new year ! I would like to know if the motherboard ASROCK 4CoreDual-SATA2 is suitable to work with the fedora kernel 2.6.X This motherboard have a chipset which is not from Intel: - Northbridge VIA PT880 Pro/PT880 Ultra - Southbridge: VIA VT8237S and it provides 2 ide slots and sata If you use fedora with this chipset, what are your feedbacks Thanks in advance Cheers -- Jean-Philippe Battu http://jeanpba.homeip.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help... Can't boot!
Quoting Stuart stu...@sjsears.com: At which point does it say that? Do you get as far as the grub menu? Partition type 0x5 is an 'Extended' partition. (/dev/sda4 or equivalent, usually) - this suggests to me that your grub.conf is incorrect, probably containing a line similar to root (hd0,3) But you can see this (I hope) by hitting 'e' at boot time, assuming you get as far as the grub countdown/menu. Grub.conf is as follows: root (hd1,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 ro root=UUID=1acff5c4-7a23-414a-9e04-f356c64e24bd rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64.img device.map is as follows: (hd0) /dev/sda (hd1) /dev/sdb When it tries to boot, I get the following (it skips the grub menu -- it's the only install there): root (hd1,0) fs type unknown, partition type 0x5. menu.lst is pretty much the same. as the grub.conf posted above. I went in and put in a 10 second delay on the menu.lst. I confirmed that it magically shows up in the grub.conf once I put it in the menu.lst. I also confirmed that i no longer need the old /home partition that I've been keeping around because I couldn't be sure what it was. :-) Maybe i'll move that down to /dev/sda and make it the /boot partition or something. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help... Can't boot!
On 03/01/09 13:24, John Aldrich wrote: Quoting Stuart stu...@sjsears.com: At which point does it say that? Do you get as far as the grub menu? Partition type 0x5 is an 'Extended' partition. (/dev/sda4 or equivalent, usually) - this suggests to me that your grub.conf is incorrect, probably containing a line similar to root (hd0,3) But you can see this (I hope) by hitting 'e' at boot time, assuming you get as far as the grub countdown/menu. Grub.conf is as follows: root (hd1,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 ro root=UUID=1acff5c4-7a23-414a-9e04-f356c64e24bd rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64.img device.map is as follows: (hd0) /dev/sda (hd1) /dev/sdb When it tries to boot, I get the following (it skips the grub menu -- it's the only install there): root (hd1,0) fs type unknown, partition type 0x5. okay, what I would do here is use the grub console to find /boot... in case you don't know how: hit 'c' to bring up the console type root (hd TAB grub should fill in the disks it can see (hopefully hd0/1/2) for each of those, try root (hdX,TAB which should give you the partition layouts and types then for each of the (hdX,0) partitions, try kernel (hdX,0)/ TAB one of them should have your vmlinuz-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 file on it. use that one in your root (hdX,0) statement. hit ESC to get back to the menu and edit the 'root' statement accordingly. See if it works after that. I think, from your previous post, that you may be pointing grub at what you think is sdc, which may only have sdc1 - Extended sdc5 - first logical partition on it. I had a similar issue with the installer seeing my disks in a different order to what I expected. Regards, Stuart -- Stuart Sears RHCA etc. It's today! said Piglet. My favourite day, said Pooh. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help... Can't boot!
Quoting Stuart Sears stu...@sjsears.com: okay, what I would do here is use the grub console to find /boot... in case you don't know how: hit 'c' to bring up the console type root (hd TAB grub should fill in the disks it can see (hopefully hd0/1/2) for each of those, try root (hdX,TAB which should give you the partition layouts and types then for each of the (hdX,0) partitions, try kernel (hdX,0)/ TAB one of them should have your vmlinuz-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 file on it. use that one in your root (hdX,0) statement. hit ESC to get back to the menu and edit the 'root' statement accordingly. See if it works after that. I think, from your previous post, that you may be pointing grub at what you think is sdc, which may only have sdc1 - Extended sdc5 - first logical partition on it. I had a similar issue with the installer seeing my disks in a different order to what I expected. Well, when I boot off the install DVD in rescue mode, it shows up correctly. I'm reinstalling yet again, this time, I told the installer to swap the disk order from what is in bios. We'll see how that goes... Hopefully I didn't just end up wiping my /home (and all my MP3 files! G) If worse comes to worse, I guess I'll put the old SDC back in the system as the primary HDD, wipe it and let Fedora use it to boot off of. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help... Can't boot!
Quoting Stuart Sears stu...@sjsears.com: I think, from your previous post, that you may be pointing grub at what you think is sdc, which may only have sdc1 - Extended sdc5 - first logical partition on it. Well, I went by what was on the system previously (custom partitioning, using the same labels as FC6.) I could be wrong, but we'll see. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help... Can't boot!
John Aldrich wrote: Quoting Stuart stu...@sjsears.com: [snip] okay, how many are there? And which one do you want to boot from? According to the installer, it's going to write the boot info to /dev/sda. Boot is /dev/sdb1. What Grub is doing is writing the boot loader for Grub to /dev/sda. This should be the drive the BIOS boots from. This is the code that loads the rest of Grub, where ever it is located. It is not talking about the /boot partition. (Or /boot from the / partition.) You can also run into the same confusion about what Grub and Linux call root. They are not the same thing. If it helps, you can think of Grub as its own small operating system. (Not exactly true, but it help with understanding the differences in naming things.) Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Compiling Programs for F10 - video4linux???
On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 19:05 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Rick Bilonick r...@nauticom.net wrote: On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 18:21 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: Rick Bilonick wrote: I'm trying to compile v4l-dvb for Fedora 10. Besides gcc, make, and kernel headers, what needs to be installed? I've compiled this for Fedora 8 and Ubuntu 8.10 without any problems. But I'm getting errors when I try to compile for F10. I get the feeling if you post the errors you are getting that someone will be able to tell you what devel package you are missing. I did that some time ago but did not receive any responses. I'll have to try again. You have to use the latest svn, or try ATrpms pre-compiled drivers: http://atrpms.net/dist/f10/video4linux/ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ Thanks but I'm not sure what the point is of using ATrpms. I added ATrpms as a repository for my F10 computer. First, yumex (with the atrpms repository enabled) cannot find video4linux. So I downloaded video4linux-20081218-87.99.fc10.i386.rpm for I386 and tried to use rpm to install it but of course this does not work either because of a dependency on video4linux-kmdl-1:20081218-87.99.fc10 which is not to be found anywhere (not matter what I search on). I thought the whole point of using yum was to automatically resolve dependencies? Rick B. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Unrecognized Hard Drive
Tim wrote: On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:24 -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: I can remember dropping a SCSI drive or two 4 to 6 onto the desk to free it up so it would spin up again. (Drop so it lands flat on its bottom, not sides or ends.) This was often necessary on drives that had run non-stop for years, and were shut down long enough to cool off. /me wonders whether warming them up, first, would have helped? It might have - stick it in an oven or something. On the other hand, it might have cause other problems. What I think was happening is that the bearing lubrication had gotten into places it should not have, and then prevented the drive from starting to spin up. The jolt freed thing up enough to get the drive spinning. It also freed the head to move as well. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help... Can't boot!
On 03/01/09 14:47, John Aldrich wrote: Quoting Stuart Sears stu...@sjsears.com: okay, what I would do here is use the grub console to find /boot... in case you don't know how: hit 'c' to bring up the console type root (hd TAB grub should fill in the disks it can see (hopefully hd0/1/2) for each of those, try root (hdX,TAB which should give you the partition layouts and types then for each of the (hdX,0) partitions, try kernel (hdX,0)/ TAB one of them should have your vmlinuz-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 file on it. use that one in your root (hdX,0) statement. hit ESC to get back to the menu and edit the 'root' statement accordingly. See if it works after that. I think, from your previous post, that you may be pointing grub at what you think is sdc, which may only have sdc1 - Extended sdc5 - first logical partition on it. I had a similar issue with the installer seeing my disks in a different order to what I expected. Well, when I boot off the install DVD in rescue mode, it shows up correctly. I'm reinstalling yet again, this time, I told the installer to swap the disk order from what is in bios. We'll see how that goes... Hopefully I didn't just end up wiping my /home (and all my MP3 files! G) did you actually try what was suggested? I'm fairly certain this is fixable without repeated reinstalls. Stuart -- Stuart Sears RHCA etc. It's today! said Piglet. My favourite day, said Pooh. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10 and Pulseaudio
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Niels Weber nathelb...@gmail.com wrote: Replying to myself as I found something out... 2008/12/11 Niels Weber nathelb...@gmail.com: So it seems that Pulseaudio is working after all... now I need only to find out how to get surround sound. After looking into the PulseAudio FAQ, that was quite easy: http://www.pulseaudio.org/wiki/FAQ#IhaveasurroundsoundcardbutPulseAudiousesjustthefrontspeakers To enable all the channels, edit /etc/pulse/daemon.conf: uncomment the default-sample-channels line (i.e. remove the semicolon from the beginning of the line) and set the value to 6 if you have a 5.1 setup, or 8 if you have 7.1 setup etc. After doing the edit, restart pulseaudio. That was all. Really easy compared to what I had to do back then to get surround working with alsa alone on one of the older Fedoras (which took me weeks). Now, surround works even in Prey - which it didn't with my previous setup (without PA under F8). Niels One thing I did was to copy default.pa and daemon.conf to ~/.pulse before editing so the change wouldn't be system wide. Also, I wasn't sure if those files might get overwritten during an update or installed as .rpmnew or whatever. Richard -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10 and Pulseaudio
Richard Shaw wrote: One thing I did was to copy default.pa and daemon.conf to ~/.pulse before editing so the change wouldn't be system wide. Also, I wasn't sure if those files might get overwritten during an update or installed as .rpmnew or whatever. It should never get overwritten. .rpmnew files would be created if there is a configuration format change. Anything else is a packaging bug. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: Yes I probably should have removed a few more headers as well to totally break it out. But, now this reply will be out of thread with your response. Bottom line People start new messages rather than trying to reply to an old one and then change the subject and all So, now that it is completely mucked over :-) It's worth pointing out that RFC-standard threading is controlled by the In-Reply-To header, not by the Subject, i.e. conforming mail clients pay *no attention* to the Subject header when displaying threads. People who hijack threads and plead that they fixed the Subject line should be told about this so they don't do it again. Hummm Can't say that I recall an RFC that fully/adequately covers threading. Can you cite the RFC? RFC 822: 4.6.2. IN-REPLY-TO The contents of this field identify previous correspon- dence which this message answers. Note that if message iden- tifiers are used in this field, they must use the msg-id specification format. Although the text doesn't explicitly use the term threading, it's pretty clear what is meant. Yet, and pardon my repetition, even *if* there are RFCs that cover how email clients are supposed to handle threading people should *not* be taking an existing message and attempting to turn it into a new message. I agree. There will always be email clients that don't fully conform to the RFC's and there will always be email clients that will attempt to go beyond what they RFC's mandate. *cough*Outlook*cough. Not to mention that most of the headers that email clients do use to help in threading aren't normally accessible. Not sure what you mean here. They're accessible to the MUA if not directly to the user. In any case, I'm arguing for *not* messing with them, so the point is moot. Besides, I could never figure out how hitting reply, changing the subject, and changing the body, to create the illusion of a new* message is easier than just actually writing a new message. Yes, it's one of life's little mysteries. In many clients composing a new message is even easier than replying. Just click on the address field in an existing message and voilà. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10 and encrypted partitions - positive outcome
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 03:41:22 -0800, Mike Cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote: The nice surprise was that on firstboot the system asked me to enter the luks passphrase for the root partition and seemed to have stored the passphrases for the other partitions within the root partition so only a single passphrase was requested. This is excellent and means that booting the fully encrypted system is now very user friendly. Do you use the same passphrase for all partitions? It has been a feature since close to the release of F10 that it tried any entered passphrase against each luks partition. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10 and encrypted partitions - positive outcome
Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 03:41:22 -0800, Mike Cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote: The nice surprise was that on firstboot the system asked me to enter the luks passphrase for the root partition and seemed to have stored the passphrases for the other partitions within the root partition so only a single passphrase was requested. This is excellent and means that booting the fully encrypted system is now very user friendly. Do you use the same passphrase for all partitions? It has been a feature since close to the release of F10 that it tried any entered passphrase against each luks partition. Yes I chose the same passphrase for all three partitions. This is the same scheme I used for F9 but in F9 it asked me three separate times for the passphrases despite them all being the same. I did not click on the first one as a master passphrase though (as far as I remember!) In F10 the screen halts soon after the post with a simple request for the passphrase and then continues with the text simplified Plymouth blue and white boot progress indicator - which although information-free does work fast and well. So I am happy with this. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/F10-and-encrypted-partitions---positive-outcome-tp21264150p21266604.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
How to Burn a Music DVD on K3B
FC8/KDE K3B only has a selection for burning a Audio CD Project 80 min. I want to burn Audio to a DVD 4gig, no what I do it holds me to 80 min. which is a Cd. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help... Can't boot!
Quoting Stuart Sears stu...@sjsears.com: Well, when I boot off the install DVD in rescue mode, it shows up correctly. I'm reinstalling yet again, this time, I told the installer to swap the disk order from what is in bios. We'll see how that goes... Hopefully I didn't just end up wiping my /home (and all my MP3 files! G) did you actually try what was suggested? I'm fairly certain this is fixable without repeated reinstalls. Well, SDC is no longer part of the equation. I removed the ribbon cable from the drive so it won't even be seen by the system. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10 and encrypted partitions - positive outcome
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 08:41:53 -0800, Mike Cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote: Yes I chose the same passphrase for all three partitions. This is the same scheme I used for F9 but in F9 it asked me three separate times for the passphrases despite them all being the same. I did not click on the first one as a master passphrase though (as far as I remember!) That's odd though. I misspoke when I said shortly before F10, it was shortly before the F9 release that it started using passphrases against each luks partition. Maybe there was something different about how your partitions were setup that F9 couldn't handle, but F10 can. You can see that the passphrases aren't being saved (well at least that saved ones aren't bing used) by entering an incorrect passphrase before a correct one. You'll then get a warning message for each luks partition that there is no key slot unlocked by that passphrase. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10 and encrypted partitions - positive outcome
Bruno Wolff III wrote: That's odd though. I misspoke when I said shortly before F10, it was shortly before the F9 release that it started using passphrases against each luks partition. Maybe there was something different about how your partitions were setup that F9 couldn't handle, but F10 can. You can see that the passphrases aren't being saved (well at least that saved ones aren't bing used) by entering an incorrect passphrase before a correct one. You'll then get a warning message for each luks partition that there is no key slot unlocked by that passphrase. Interesting! The F9 partitions were set up nominally using the same technique during the F9 install as I just did for F10 (except that I had previously randomised all the partitions just ahead of the original F9 install). The F10 install was a clean install over the F9 partitions but nothing additional was done. Either way I do like the current setup - I have not yet plugged in a test encrypted usbkey that I was playing with under F9, nor a luks encrypted CD that I prepared in F9. For the usbkey the system just asked for the passphrase after plugging in and then just mounted and was visible, so I hope this will be the same in F10. The encrypted CD was a pain in F9 and needed some commands entering to set up the mapping - certainly it would not just ask for the passphrase and mount - I am currently testing some other things on the encrypted laptop but I will do these tests hopefully before the weekend is out. Mike -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/F10-and-encrypted-partitions---positive-outcome-tp21264150p21266946.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X locks up after a random time
Anne Wilson wrote: This Mandriva laptop has a variation on that. With Desktop Effects on I get random freezes, but I also get times when the mouse can move the cursor around, but neither mouse-clicks or keyboard usage is registered. This has happened throughout, so I don't think that it's kernel-specific, but I do think that it is probably related to what you are both seeing. I think this is the bug I reported on both bugzilla.redhat and bugs.kde. I have never tested with gnome or compiz, only with kde using opengl and xrender. It happens both times and I have Intel graphics on both computers. In my case, I get the too many open files in system message on one of the consoles when this happens. I am unable to open programs, unable to save files (hence lose my work), etc, but the mouse and keyboard don't fail, so I can kill X and log back in, but the problem seems to recur sooner than if I had rebooted. My guess is that this is some kind of Intel driver problem, possibly not interacting well with either X or with Desktop Effects. Nevertheless, I will not give up on Intel and do not intend to migrate (regress) back to a vendor that doesn't provide open drivers. I can live without desktop Effects for a while until this gets cleared up (admittedly, it has been a year already that I have monitored the problem, and progress is slow, but the problem has evolved slightly, as formerly not even the mouse and keyboard worked, but since about the fall, it is no longer necessary to pull the plug on the computer to reboot). -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X locks up after a random time
These are the bugs I reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468110 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179081 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to Burn a Music DVD on K3B
On Saturday 03 January 2009 12:43:22 pm Jim wrote: K3B only has a selection for burning a Audio CD Project 80 min. I want to burn Audio to a DVD 4gig, no what I do it holds me to 80 min. which is a Cd. You can't do that, AFAIK. An Audio CD is a standard (search for Red Book standard) and it doesn't work with recordable DVD's. Now, if you want to burn a DVD with music content (e.g. MP3, AAC files etc) that's another story...and that's where you would select Create DATA DVD on K3B. HTH, Jorge -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
can't log in after converting root filesystem
Hello, Friendly Fedora Folks: My problem seems possibly related to some recently reported issues, but I'm unable to fit suggested solutions to my issue. Anyway, here goes: I have an Asus EeePC 900A. It predictably took me about 2.5 minutes to figure out that I wanted nothing at all to do with the crummy Linux distro that came with it. I wanted Fedora and thought I'd try out the Omega spin that Rahul announced recently. Now the 900A has only a 4GB flash chip for internal storage, so I started thinking of ways to reduce writes to the filesystem. It seemed to me that ext2 was a better fit than ext3 because there would be no need to write the journal data. During the install from LiveCD, I chose to format the entire 4GB as ext2 and mount it on /. No separate /boot partition, no swap partition. After install, I discovered that the root filesystem was ext3 despite my explicit instruction to format it as ext2. I consider that a bug, which I might pursue if I can get past my current predicament. I figured that downgrading to ext2 would not be difficult. So I changed ext3 to ext2 in fstab and added noatime to the options. Everything seems good at this point. I reboot, and mount tells me that the root filesystem is, indeed, ext2. After running through the installed packages and removing several that I thought would never be relevant to my limited hardware, I rebooted again and found everything good. Well, almost everything. It turns out that now I can yum update everything except for the kernel. After kernel update, I can't log in at all. I get to the gdm screen, enter username and password, and it just returns immediately to a fresh gdm screen. If I boot to runlevel 3, I have a similar symptom in text -- entering username and password just returns to the login prompt. At this point, I'm stuck. I've tried everything I know (not much) and I can't log in. I did take a snapshot of the system with dd just before upgrading the kernel, so I can always bring that back. But then I can never apply any kernel updates. Help! -Alan -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: can't log in after converting root filesystem
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:34:24AM -0800, Alan Evans wrote: Hello, Friendly Fedora Folks: Alan: I discovered (on my eeepc 901) that adding relatime to /etc/fstab causes subsequent kernel installs to go bad in that they create bad initrd file and causing boot to fail with complaints about relatime being an unknown option. did you try booting the previous kernel to see if it will work for you? If it does, you could then remove the noatime from /etc/fstab, recreate the initrd for the new kernel, the re-add the noatime and try booting the new kernel. (see man initrd for guidance.) Fred My problem seems possibly related to some recently reported issues, but I'm unable to fit suggested solutions to my issue. Anyway, here goes: I have an Asus EeePC 900A. It predictably took me about 2.5 minutes to figure out that I wanted nothing at all to do with the crummy Linux distro that came with it. I wanted Fedora and thought I'd try out the Omega spin that Rahul announced recently. Now the 900A has only a 4GB flash chip for internal storage, so I started thinking of ways to reduce writes to the filesystem. It seemed to me that ext2 was a better fit than ext3 because there would be no need to write the journal data. During the install from LiveCD, I chose to format the entire 4GB as ext2 and mount it on /. No separate /boot partition, no swap partition. After install, I discovered that the root filesystem was ext3 despite my explicit instruction to format it as ext2. I consider that a bug, which I might pursue if I can get past my current predicament. I figured that downgrading to ext2 would not be difficult. So I changed ext3 to ext2 in fstab and added noatime to the options. Everything seems good at this point. I reboot, and mount tells me that the root filesystem is, indeed, ext2. After running through the installed packages and removing several that I thought would never be relevant to my limited hardware, I rebooted again and found everything good. Well, almost everything. It turns out that now I can yum update everything except for the kernel. After kernel update, I can't log in at all. I get to the gdm screen, enter username and password, and it just returns immediately to a fresh gdm screen. If I boot to runlevel 3, I have a similar symptom in text -- entering username and password just returns to the login prompt. At this point, I'm stuck. I've tried everything I know (not much) and I can't log in. I did take a snapshot of the system with dd just before upgrading the kernel, so I can always bring that back. But then I can never apply any kernel updates. Help! -Alan -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. -- Matthew 7:21 (niv) - pgpTDLr0wQg4I.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10 Strange Audio Errors
on 12/26/2008 11:32 AM Sean Bruno wrote: On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 18:52 -0800, Peter Langfelder wrote: On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Sean Bruno sean.br...@dsl-only.net wrote: I'm seeing strange audio issues(skipping and buffering) when playing audio from Amarok(1.4), Audacity and from the video game Quake Wars. I have an on-board sound card: 00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97 Audio Controller (rev a2) And a USB Turntable: Bus 002 Device 005: ID 08bb:2900 Texas Instruments Japan PCM2900 Audio Codec Periodically, while Amarok(1.4) is playing back I see: Dec 25 16:48:45 localhost pulseaudio[15582]: module-alsa-sink.c: ALSA woke us up to write new data to the device, but there was actually nothing to write! Most likely t his is an ALSA driver bug. Please report this issue to the PulseAudio developers. When Audacity is recording from the USB turntable I see: ALSA sound/usb/usbaudio.c:351: frame 0 active: -70 And when Quake Wars is running, I see the following in the console output: snd_pcm_readi failed: Input/output error snd_pcm_readi failed: Input/output error snd_pcm_readi failed: Input/output error Any ideas as to what is going on here? Sean I used to experience similar skipping and hesitating from Amarok 1.4... until I removed PulseAudio. Now amarok plays smoothly. Peter I assume that requires more than just stopping the pulse audio demon? I did not want to test my luck so removed everything related to pulseaudio in addition, except $ rpm -qa | grep pulse pulseaudio-libs-glib2-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386 pulseaudio-core-libs-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386 pulseaudio-libs-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386 pulseaudio-libs-devel-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386 pulseaudio-utils-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386 pulseaudio-libs-zeroconf-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386 because those serve as dependencies for something else I have installed and want to keep. it's a shame, since I had no luck with pulseaudio since F8 and really was hoping to keep it in F10 finally. -- regards, Oleksandr Korneta I'm running F9 x86_64 and F10 i386 on x86_64 hardware, should this matter. /The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from./ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X locks up after a random time
On Saturday 03 January 2009 17:17:47 Petrus de Calguarium wrote: These are the bugs I reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468110 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179081 Neither of those sound like my problem - I just suddenly discover that my mouse and keyboard are not being read. Sometimes gkrellm shows a total freeze, but I'm fairly sure that there have been other times when normal activity has been occurring behind the scenes. Either way, despite waiting to see whether the problem goes away, the only way out is to power off. This is an ATi X600 graphics card. At first I had the OSS ati driver, then I added flgrx in case I was trying to do something that really needed acceleration. Not being a gamer, I have little experience of using graphics acceleration. Basically, the effects I was trying to use were Dim Inactive Windows and Cover Switch. The system is rock-solid if I don't enable Desktop Effects. Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Need advice on music management software
on 12/26/2008 05:36 PM Simon Slater wrote: On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 09:32 -0800, Konstantin Svist wrote: I know for sure there's a graphics comparison program that does this with images - I've used it once or twice :) I'm following this thread because I will be setting up something similar for our family's music. But as to your reference to duplicate images, what programme do you use? One daughter has a new camera and is photographing everything, but with her sorting and renaming has created many duplicates. I assume your duplicates are just multiple copies of the same file with different names and paths, and they didn't go through any type of conversion on the way. For those you can perhaps to use FSlint. FSlint is a utility to find redundant disk usage like duplicate files for example. It can be used to reclaim disk space and fix other problems like file naming issues and bad symlinks etc. It includes a GTK+ GUI as well as a command line interface. there is an rpm for F10 in mrdocs repository http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/mrdocs/Fedora_10/ I substantially cleaned up my media library with its help. -- regards, Oleksandr Korneta I'm running F9 x86_64 and F10 i386 on x86_64 hardware, should this matter. /The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from./ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
SOLVED -- Re: Help... Can't boot! (but more issues)
Well, I got it working finally... but i'm having some issues... the display is slightly off screen to the right, and I can't adjust it on the monitor because the left side is already at 0. I used to be able to access the display settings, etc from the desktop, but that's not possible. Also, I discovered that the /home partition I wanted to save was on the disconnected drive, so when I was swapping my cable around on sda and sdb to get them to be in the order the system wanted, I also hooked /dev/sdc back up. Now, how do I get my old /home to be /home? All I have is a uuid in fstab. I suppose I could edit it and make it like the old style, but I'm not sure that would work. Two questions then: 1) How do I access the display settings to change the refresh rate to adjust the horizontal positioning? 2) How do I tell Fedora 10 to move /home to a different location? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:15:51 +1930, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: [...] It's worth pointing out that RFC-standard threading is controlled by the In-Reply-To header, not by the Subject, i.e. conforming mail clients pay *no attention* to the Subject header when displaying threads. People who hijack threads and plead that they fixed the Subject line should be told about this so they don't do it again. Would you believe that's news to me? I've been at this twelve or fifteen years, with all the exposure that implies -- and don't even recall ever hearing of that header -- Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert Fedora 8 9; Alpine 2.00, Pan 0.132; Privoxy 3.0.6; Dillo 0.8.6, Galeon 2, Epiphany 2, Opera 9, Firefox 2 3 Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: can't log in after converting root filesystem
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM, fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote: On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:34:24AM -0800, Alan Evans wrote: I discovered (on my eeepc 901) that adding relatime to /etc/fstab causes subsequent kernel installs to go bad in that they create bad initrd file and causing boot to fail with complaints about relatime being an unknown option. I read the bug about relatime, but didn't think it was applicable, relatime being somewhat more recent than noatime. I guess I don't really have a preference between. I don't run any automated backup software. did you try booting the previous kernel to see if it will work for you? If it does, you could then remove the noatime from /etc/fstab, recreate the initrd for the new kernel, the re-add the noatime and try booting the new kernel. (see man initrd for guidance.) Anyway, I tried it. Removed noatime from fstab. (Booting old kernel did work.) Ran mkinitrd with no optional parameters. Still no joy. If I change the fstype back to ext3 and run mkinitrd then the system boots with apparently no problem. Then I can change fstab back to ext2 and reboot and it works. But it all seems wrong to me. I presume I need to jack this around again before and after every kernel update. And since the initrd still thinks the filesystem is ext3, I can't ever run tune2fs to actually convert it to ext2 lest the initrd choke on it. Yuck. I hope someone's working on this. Is there a bugzilla somewhere? I looked, but didn't find anything specifically similar to my problem. And what of the installer ignoring my preference for ext2? At this point I figure that if it had honored my instruction, I would have had an unusable system from the beginning... Hoping there's a better answer! -Alan -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: SOLVED -- Re: Help... Can't boot! (but more issues)
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 14:51 -0500, John Aldrich wrote: Well, I got it working finally... but i'm having some issues... the display is slightly off screen to the right, and I can't adjust it on the monitor because the left side is already at 0. I used to be able to access the display settings, etc from the desktop, but that's not possible. Also, I discovered that the /home partition I wanted to save was on the disconnected drive, so when I was swapping my cable around on sda and sdb to get them to be in the order the system wanted, I also hooked /dev/sdc back up. Now, how do I get my old /home to be /home? All I have is a uuid in fstab. I suppose I could edit it and make it like the old style, but I'm not sure that would work. Two questions then: 1) How do I access the display settings to change the refresh rate to adjust the horizontal positioning? 2) How do I tell Fedora 10 to move /home to a different location? using UUID to identify partitions makes so much sense that you only need to adopt in your old '/home' to find out the uuid of your old '/home', figure out which partition it is (i.e. /dev/sda7) blkid /dev/sda7 # reports the UUID copy that and paste into /etc/fstab for your /home mount Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Need advice on music management software
oleksandr korneta wrote: FSlint is a utility to find redundant disk usage like duplicate files for example. It can be used to reclaim disk space and fix other problems like file naming issues and bad symlinks etc. It includes a GTK+ GUI as well as a command line interface. there is an rpm for F10 in mrdocs repository http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/mrdocs/Fedora_10/ Just curious, why use an external repository when fslint is packaged in Fedora already (by the upstream maintainer even)? -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines -- Steven Wright pgpJU7dMQz5vD.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: HiJacking Threads -- apology new (OT??) question
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:15:51 +1930, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: [...] It's worth pointing out that RFC-standard threading is controlled by the In-Reply-To header, not by the Subject, i.e. conforming mail clients pay *no attention* to the Subject header when displaying threads. People who hijack threads and plead that they fixed the Subject line should be told about this so they don't do it again. Sorry; hit send inadvertently -- anybody know a source for upgrading old eyes and fingers? I want to thank Patrick O'Callaghan for posting that very instructive fact. I also want to ask a question I haven't seen yet in this thread. Suppose I happen on a new fact that sends *me* off on a tangent -- something I've long meant to ask about, but not really relevant to the thread. (Here, for instance,it might be Things the Uninitiated Need to Know and Never Get Told.) To do it, I naturally ought to start a new thread -- but also give the passage about the *In* Reply-to header, with credit to P O'C and what would be a bibliographic footnote if we were doing this in old- fashioned paper journals. People who've survived a turn among the shovels and funnels of grad school (probably still there -- but oh! the bliss not to know!) will instinctively want to cover themselves in such a way; and that instinct, I suggest, may account for quite a bit of thread hijacking. Such people will jump to a better alternative if they find one. Is there a canonical one? Some special command that a newbie can handle, that accomplishes all that, and nevertheless begins a fresh thread? Cp handles a lot of it, but how about carrying along the finding info? It's mostly not even displayed, or not prominently, at least to my ancient eyes -- Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
3ware 3dm2 and Fedora 10
Has anyone succeeded in installing one of the latest versions of the 3ware 3dm2 software on Fedora 10 (x86_64)? I tried both 9.5.1.1 and 9.4.1.3, but in both cases, the setupLinux_x64.bin program aborted claiming that it was unable to delete some temporary files. Looking through the script some, it seems that it may be related to Java, but I couldn't find a way around this. Ultimately, I wound up installing an older version, 9.3.0.4, which seems to work fine on Fedora 10 (i.e., I can access 3dm2 through firefox and monitor my RAID). But I'd like to know what the issue with the newer versions is. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: can't log in after converting root filesystem
I hope it works. You use a livecd and in the terminal: /dev/sda1 = / (your linux, as appropriate) Example: fsck /dev/sda1 mount /dev/sda1 /media/linux chroot /media/linux source /etc/profile And change the password: passwd There is another way you can do in the event that the above does not work, change the kernel version and so on ... grub edit kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.9.42.ELsmp ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb quiet 1 Press Enter, and the B, mode single-kernel boot. Once we can use the passwd command to change the password for the root. Passwd # Enter new UNIX password: Gustavo Eli Pelcastre H. Hello, Friendly Fedora Folks: My problem seems possibly related to some recently reported issues, but I'm unable to fit suggested solutions to my issue. Anyway, here goes: I have an Asus EeePC 900A. It predictably took me about 2.5 minutes to figure out that I wanted nothing at all to do with the crummy Linux distro that came with it. I wanted Fedora and thought I'd try out the Omega spin that Rahul announced recently. Now the 900A has only a 4GB flash chip for internal storage, so I started thinking of ways to reduce writes to the filesystem. It seemed to me that ext2 was a better fit than ext3 because there would be no need to write the journal data. During the install from LiveCD, I chose to format the entire 4GB as ext2 and mount it on /. No separate /boot partition, no swap partition. After install, I discovered that the root filesystem was ext3 despite my explicit instruction to format it as ext2. I consider that a bug, which I might pursue if I can get past my current predicament. I figured that downgrading to ext2 would not be difficult. So I changed ext3 to ext2 in fstab and added noatime to the options. Everything seems good at this point. I reboot, and mount tells me that the root filesystem is, indeed, ext2. After running through the installed packages and removing several that I thought would never be relevant to my limited hardware, I rebooted again and found everything good. Well, almost everything. It turns out that now I can yum update everything except for the kernel. After kernel update, I can't log in at all. I get to the gdm screen, enter username and password, and it just returns immediately to a fresh gdm screen. If I boot to runlevel 3, I have a similar symptom in text -- entering username and password just returns to the login prompt. At this point, I'm stuck. I've tried everything I know (not much) and I can't log in. I did take a snapshot of the system with dd just before upgrading the kernel, so I can always bring that back. But then I can never apply any kernel updates. Help! -Alan -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X locks up after a random time
On Saturday 03 January 2009 02:36, Rex Dieter wrote: Marko Vojinovic wrote: Ok, this is a Fujitsu Siemens Esprimo U9200, with Intel graphics, F10 64bit, updated last week. KDE desktop, compiz and all, but I believe it is not related. In the meantime, I've tried backing down to using kernel-2.6.27.7-134.fc10 (from kernel-2.6.27.9-159.fc10) to see if that makes any difference. I have been having this issue since FC10 came out, throughout several kernel updates, so I believe this is not kernel related. However, F9 has been working on the same hardware and KDE/compiz without hiccups, but this was 32bit install. Since F10 I went 64bit, and I wonder if that might be related... Best, :-) Marko -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X locks up after a random time
On Saturday 03 January 2009 02:07, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@panet.co.yuwrote: Ok, this is a Fujitsu Siemens Esprimo U9200, with Intel graphics, F10 64bit, updated last week. KDE desktop, compiz and all, but I believe it is not related. The symptom: system boots up regularly, I do regular work, and after a random amount of time, X freezes. If compiz is on, all I can do is move the mouse pointer. If compiz is off, even the mouse pointer is frozen. The OS itself is not, I can ssh from a remote machine and read logs. This is not reproducible, it happens too randomly and I can only sit and wait for it to happen. However, it is extremely annoying, since it has a tendency to freeze when I'm in the middle of some work in progress. You can try using Option AccelMethod XAA in your xorg.conf to see if there is any difference (I have never tried). What was the command to generate xorg.conf? I saw it here in some post some time ago, but can't find it now... Also, in which Section of xorg.conf shoud I put the above option? Thanks for helping! :-) Marko -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X locks up after a random time
--- On Sat, 1/3/09, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@panet.co.yu wrote: You can try using Option AccelMethod XAA in your xorg.conf to see if there is any difference (I have never tried). What was the command to generate xorg.conf? I saw it here in some post some time ago, but can't find it now... boot into level 3, login as root # Xorg -configure creates a file /root/xorg.conf.new test it with directions given something like X -??? then if it works, posts mouse pointer in about middle of screen, copy it over to /etc/X11 directory # cp xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf Also, in which Section of xorg.conf shoud I put the above option? This I am not sure, but maybe in the section previous to Monitor section ? Thanks for helping! :-) Marko -- Regards, Antonio -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Beartooth wrote: Would you believe that's news to me? I've been at this twelve or fifteen years, with all the exposure that implies -- and don't even recall ever hearing of that header if you view the headers of emails, you will find that not all use 'In-Reply-To:' as an example, your email client is; } From: Beartooth bearto...@swva.net } Message-ID: pan.2009.01.03.20.38...@swva.net } References: 495df108.8030...@greshko.com } 96da45630901021645q40648743ja126d77f8b506...@mail.gmail.com } X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: wireless-216-222-139-029.citizip.com } User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) where as; } From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com } Message-ID: 96da45630901030811y49a36cafide9335e197df3...@mail.gmail.com } In-Reply-To: 495ebef5.7010...@greshko.com } References: 495df108.8030...@greshko.com } 96da45630901021645q40648743ja126d77f8b506...@mail.gmail.com } 495ebef5.7010...@greshko.com and; } From: Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com } Message-ID: 495ebef5.7010...@greshko.com } User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; } rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080421 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 } Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 } References: 495df108.8030...@greshko.com } 96da45630901021645q40648743ja126d77f8b506...@mail.gmail.com } In-Reply-To: 96da45630901021645q40648743ja126d77f8b506...@mail.gmail.com peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html.gz 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJX96R+C4Bj9Rkw/wRAtJXAJ0X9V/zNuPKqmFV+WKyuEezKDuXDACaAr5T E49GHaHRo06N5rks9myNDrU= =9PtZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: Hummm Can't say that I recall an RFC that fully/adequately covers threading. Can you cite the RFC? RFC 822: 4.6.2. IN-REPLY-TO The contents of this field identify previous correspon- dence which this message answers. Note that if message iden- tifiers are used in this field, they must use the msg-id specification format. Although the text doesn't explicitly use the term threading, it's pretty clear what is meant. Hummm. It leaves quite a bit open to interpretation and it would only link one message with one reply. I was looking for something more all encompassing. But never mind Not to mention that most of the headers that email clients do use to help in threading aren't normally accessible. Not sure what you mean here. They're accessible to the MUA if not directly to the user. In any case, I'm arguing for *not* messing with them, so the point is moot. RightNot sure myself what my purpose was. I suppose it was to point out that the average user doesn't have access to the headers they would have to change in order to *not* break threading by doing what they are doing. Then again, if the average user knows that what they are doing is going to break threading they wouldn't do it ... and if they did they wouldn't know what headers to fix ... and if they did it would be hard to the point of not doing it in the first place. Bottom line You're right and that(those) paragraph(s) shouldn't have been written. :-) Besides, I could never figure out how hitting reply, changing the subject, and changing the body, to create the illusion of a new* message is easier than just actually writing a new message. Yes, it's one of life's little mysteries. In many clients composing a new message is even easier than replying. Just click on the address field in an existing message and voilà. poc -- What's the MATTER Sid?... Is your BEVERAGE unsatisfactory? mei-mei.gres...@greshko.com http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Todd Zullinger wrote: I don't see the benefit of reiterating all of the guidelines in each message. Perhaps we need a page on the wiki that explains why a page on wiki would be great. for something *more* to reference to. but as long as a hijacker gets a reply to his post, what does he care. hijacking is just as bad as 'text/html' and 'base64', top posting and leaving unneeded history. if a poster gets a reply, then why should they be concerned with following 'guide lines'? you can suggest and write all the instructions you want, but if they are not enforced/followed, it is all in vain. just like continually telling a child that if he/she does not stop doing what they are not supposed to, they will get spanked. after hearing it 8 or 10 times, the child will come to believe that it is just idle words and they mean nothing. peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html.gz 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJX+Dr+C4Bj9Rkw/wRAlZ8AJ0eP14dfHtMJUGhUnDblCsRDk0n+gCdEFnH v52/xGjNK+feHGBHkcKPYHo= =V4V2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Need advice on music management software
on 01/03/2009 03:05 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: oleksandr korneta wrote: FSlint is a utility to find redundant disk usage like duplicate files for example. It can be used to reclaim disk space and fix other problems like file naming issues and bad symlinks etc. It includes a GTK+ GUI as well as a command line interface. there is an rpm for F10 in mrdocs repository http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/mrdocs/Fedora_10/ Just curious, why use an external repository when fslint is packaged in Fedora already (by the upstream maintainer even)? maybe you see it there, but I don't. F10 here. -- regards, Oleksandr Korneta I'm running F9 x86_64 and F10 i386 on x86_64 hardware, should this matter. /The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from./ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
gdmsetup not present in Fc9 or Fc10
To All: Does any one know how to limit the names of users that appear on the login screen of FC9 and FC10? With Fc8 through Fc5 I belive gdmsetup gave you the option of listing all users or the ability to limit the display to specific users on the login screen. Thanks, Greg Ennis -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: smart in f10
on 12/28/2008 03:19 AM Raman Gupta wrote: oleksandr korneta wrote: seems like that fix didn't make it into this update or something, because my smart is still crashing on Loading cache... with the error Traceback (most recent call last): ( 97%) File /usr/bin/smart, line 195, in module main(sys.argv[1:]) Apparently there was a problem with the recent smart build for f10, and the patch was not correctly applied: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473213 In the meantime, you can manually patch your rpm/base.py file with the patch found here: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19956842/smart-emptyprov.diff That will work around the issue until the patched version shows up in the repos. thanks. It was already there by the time I read your reply. -- regards, Oleksandr Korneta I'm running F9 x86_64 and F10 i386 on x86_64 hardware, should this matter. /The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from./ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Need advice on music management software
oleksandr korneta wrote: maybe you see it there, but I don't. F10 here. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fslint http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Everything/i386/os/Packages/fslint-2.28-1.fc10.noarch.rpm Perhaps the addon repo you installed has masked the official Fedora build from you? -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ Between two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before. -- Mae West pgpNWTxIwxo69.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: gdmsetup not present in Fc9 or Fc10
--- On Sat, 1/3/09, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: From: Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net Subject: gdmsetup not present in Fc9 or Fc10 To: Fedora Core Users fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Saturday, January 3, 2009, 2:22 PM To All: Does any one know how to limit the names of users that appear on the login screen of FC9 and FC10? With Fc8 through Fc5 I belive gdmsetup gave you the option of listing all users or the ability to limit the display to specific users on the login screen. Thanks, Greg Ennis --- Please take a look here: http://live.gnome.org/GDM/2.22/Configuration hopefully you will find what you need there. Regards, Antonio -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: gdmsetup not present in Fc9 or Fc10
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 14:32 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote: --- On Sat, 1/3/09, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: From: Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net Subject: gdmsetup not present in Fc9 or Fc10 To: Fedora Core Users fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Saturday, January 3, 2009, 2:22 PM To All: Does any one know how to limit the names of users that appear on the login screen of FC9 and FC10? With Fc8 through Fc5 I belive gdmsetup gave you the option of listing all users or the ability to limit the display to specific users on the login screen. Thanks, Greg Ennis --- Please take a look here: http://live.gnome.org/GDM/2.22/Configuration hopefully you will find what you need there. Regards, Antonio Antonio, Thanks for the link Looks like gdmsetup is gone and what we could do with the login screen using Fc5 through Fc8 is gone too. Too bad it was a good option!!! Greg -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Activate second volume group at boot
I have an external drive that I've created a second volume group on. I've done a bit of poring over the init scripts in my /etc and in the initrd image, but there doesn't seem to be any facility to activate anything but VolGroup00 during the boot sequence. There's something in the netfs script, but from what I can unconvolute (comments in code are a Good Thing[tm]), it's not what I'm looking for. I can write my own init script, but I was wondering if there's already a facility to do it that I've missed, I prefer to use the Fedora Way if it exists. Thanks, e. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X locks up after a random time
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Antonio Olivares olivares14...@yahoo.comwrote: --- On Sat, 1/3/09, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@panet.co.yu wrote: You can try using Option AccelMethod XAA in your xorg.conf to see if there is any difference (I have never tried). What was the command to generate xorg.conf? I saw it here in some post some time ago, but can't find it now... boot into level 3, login as root # Xorg -configure creates a file /root/xorg.conf.new test it with directions given something like X -??? then if it works, posts mouse pointer in about middle of screen, copy it over to /etc/X11 directory # cp xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf Also, in which Section of xorg.conf shoud I put the above option? This I am not sure, but maybe in the section previous to Monitor section ? Section Device Identifier Videocard0 Driverintel Option AccelMethod XAA EndSection -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X locks up after a random time
Anne Wilson wrote: This is an ATi X600 graphics card. At first I had the OSS ati driver, then I added flgrx in case I was trying to do something that really needed acceleration. Not being a gamer, I have little experience of using graphics acceleration. Then what you're seeing is most likely a bug in the fglrx driver. I'd suggest reinstalling your GNU/Linux to be sure to get rid of all traces of it. The X600 actually has working acceleration in the Free Software drivers. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: gdmsetup not present in Fc9 or Fc10
Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Thanks for the link Looks like gdmsetup is gone and what we could do with the login screen using Fc5 through Fc8 is gone too. Too bad it was a good option!!! Well, you could use KDM if you want something more configurable. :-) Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
mdadm: cannot open device /dev/sda1: Device or resource busy \ mdadm: /dev/sda1 has no superblock - assembly aborted
Hey Folks, I've got a problem that I cannot seem to make go away. I've got a machine running FC8 ]# uname -a Linux hostname 2.6.26.6-49.fc8 #1 SMP Fri Oct 17 15:33:32 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux with an external eSATA Hard Drive RAID 5 array. I installed a replacement drive for the main system and performed a fresh install of FC10 with the RAID 5 array disconnected. Then after ensuring all updates were completed (as of Jan 03/09) I reattached the array. As root I issued the mdadm command and received the following error: ]# mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sda1 mdadm: cannot open device /dev/sda1: Device or resource busy mdadm: /dev/sda1 has no superblock - assembly aborted I cannot seem to determine why I cannot access the sda1 drive. I have replaced the FC8 system drive and all is well. I can start and mount the RAID array normally. There is no mdadm.conf file. I have always mounted the array manually. I've beat Google into a frenzy over the last couple days trying find a solution to no avail. Any clues/hints/suggestion? Thanks much. Additional information: == ]# mdadm --assemble --run /dev/md1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 This will work to bring up the array under FC10 in a degraded state. I did remove sda1 from the array, then delete and recreate the partition on sda, and attempt to add it back into the array, but continue to receive the same error messages from mdadm. I had to rebuild the array under FC8. ]# lsof | grep -i sda nothing listed == ]# mdadm --examine /dev/sda1 /dev/sda1: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 0.90.00 UUID : c03bad6f:28dae689:a100065d:2118bad4 Creation Time : Sat Nov 8 17:08:48 2008 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 488383936 (465.76 GiB 500.11 GB) Array Size : 1953535744 (1863.04 GiB 2000.42 GB) Raid Devices : 5 Total Devices : 5 Preferred Minor : 1 Update Time : Sat Jan 3 16:11:42 2009 State : clean Active Devices : 5 Working Devices : 5 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : 3fb6543 - correct Events : 445816 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 64K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 4 814 active sync /dev/sda1 0 0 8 330 active sync /dev/sdc1 1 1 8 491 active sync /dev/sdd1 2 2 8 652 active sync /dev/sde1 3 3 8 813 active sync /dev/sdf1 4 4 814 active sync /dev/sda1 == ]# mdadm --examine /dev/sdb1 mdadm: No md superblock detected on /dev/sdb1. ]# mdadm --examine /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdc1: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 0.90.00 UUID : c03bad6f:28dae689:a100065d:2118bad4 Creation Time : Sat Nov 8 17:08:48 2008 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 488383936 (465.76 GiB 500.11 GB) Array Size : 1953535744 (1863.04 GiB 2000.42 GB) Raid Devices : 5 Total Devices : 5 Preferred Minor : 1 Update Time : Sat Jan 3 16:11:42 2009 State : clean Active Devices : 5 Working Devices : 5 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : 3fb655b - correct Events : 445816 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 64K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 0 8 330 active sync /dev/sdc1 0 0 8 330 active sync /dev/sdc1 1 1 8 491 active sync /dev/sdd1 2 2 8 652 active sync /dev/sde1 3 3 8 813 active sync /dev/sdf1 4 4 814 active sync /dev/sda1 = ]# mdadm --examine /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdc1: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 0.90.00 UUID : c03bad6f:28dae689:a100065d:2118bad4 Creation Time : Sat Nov 8 17:08:48 2008 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 488383936 (465.76 GiB 500.11 GB) Array Size : 1953535744 (1863.04 GiB 2000.42 GB) Raid Devices : 5 Total Devices : 5 Preferred Minor : 1 Update Time : Sat Jan 3 16:11:42 2009 State : clean Active Devices : 5 Working Devices : 5 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : 3fb655b - correct Events : 445816 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 64K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 0 8 330 active sync /dev/sdc1 0 0 8 330 active sync /dev/sdc1 1 1 8 491 active sync /dev/sdd1
Boinc
Anyone here running Boinc on Fedora 10 x86_64? I followed the instructions on their (Boinc/s...@home) website and ran yum install boinc... and it installed two packages. Now when I try to run boincmgr, I get the following error in the console: connect: Connection refused execvp(/oldhome/john/boinc, --redirectio, --launched_by_manager) failed with error 13! connect: Operation now in progress Any ideas? What the heck is error 13 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Boinc
John Aldrich wrote: Anyone here running Boinc on Fedora 10 x86_64? I followed the instructions on their (Boinc/s...@home) website and ran yum install boinc... and it installed two packages. Now when I try to run boincmgr, I get the following error in the console: connect: Connection refused execvp(/oldhome/john/boinc, --redirectio, --launched_by_manager) failed with error 13! connect: Operation now in progress Any ideas? What the heck is error 13 that is EACCES (Access Denied) caused by either failing to start the boinc-client daemon [service boinc-client start] or by Selinux doing something. THiings like this are why I run in permissive mode. -- Wolfe -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: OT: Looking for tool to merge rmvb files
Paul Smith wrote: On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 12:01 PM, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote: Is there some tool to merge rmvb files for F10? For the unknowing, what does file whatever.rmbv tell you ? Thanks, Dave, for your answer. I think one can get an answer to your question at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMVB Thanks, and what does linux's file command respond to one of those files ? (since I don't have such a file). DaveT. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Default route not set on boot up
Craig White wrote: On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 22:01 -0500, Andrew Robinson wrote: Charles Crayne wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:49:32 -0500 Andrew Robinson awrobinson...@nc.rr.com wrote: After installing F10, when I power up my laptop, the default route does not get set. I had this problem as a symptom of the broken network configuration tool. I have a GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 statement in both the ifcfg-wlan0 file and the /etc/sysconfig/network file. Check the NETMASK statement in those files. The NETMASK in the ifcfg-wlan0 file is good. I noticed and fixed that problem during the installation. There is no NETMASK statement in the /etc/sysconfig/network file. Any other ideas? netmask should not be in /etc/sysconfig/network you can however put GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 there Just out of curiousity, are you sure that the gateway address isn't registered on startup? route -n # doesn't show the default gateway address at startup? if so, does running the commands... ifdown wlan0 ifup wlan0 make the gateway address appear in 'route -n' after running those commands? Interesting. The default route does appear after an ifdown - ifup. I've been using 'netstat -nr' to determine its existence. So that begs the question of why it is not set at boot time. Any thoughts? Thanks! Andrew -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 3ware 3dm2 and Fedora 10
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 15:51 -0500, Mike Zingale wrote: Has anyone succeeded in installing one of the latest versions of the 3ware 3dm2 software on Fedora 10 (x86_64)? I tried both 9.5.1.1 and 9.4.1.3, but in both cases, the setupLinux_x64.bin program aborted claiming that it was unable to delete some temporary files. Looking through the script some, it seems that it may be related to Java, but I couldn't find a way around this. Ultimately, I wound up installing an older version, 9.3.0.4, which seems to work fine on Fedora 10 (i.e., I can access 3dm2 through firefox and monitor my RAID). But I'd like to know what the issue with the newer versions is. Mike, The 3ware setup/install does not play nice with the Fedora openjdk. When I installed 3ware 9.5.1.1 some time ago, I downloaded Sun Java tgz, set JAVA_HOME env var and added $JAVA_HOME/bin to front of path, before running the setup program. That worked. Regards Clive -- Clive Messer cl...@vacuumtube.org.uk -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
firefox hangs at mediayou.net
Hi gang! When I first set up my F10 system, after a little tinkering with plugins, etc., I was able to listen to the various radio stations from mediayou.net. The last couple weeks it isn't working anymore: I go to that site, select a station, the popup opens saying it's loading data then it just hangs. I left it for 5-10 minutes and it's still hung. Clicking the window close button it tells me it's not responding, do I wanna kill it? Not sure how to troubleshoot this,... anyone else ever use that site to find a radio station? Anyone suggest how to proceed? Thanks! -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, keeping watch on the wicked and the good. - Proverbs 15:3 (niv) - pgpNVyezQB1zu.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Boinc
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 19:32 -0500, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: THiings like this are why I run in permissive mode. If you do that all the time, you may as well disable SELinux, it's not protecting you from anything in permissive mode. Enforcing - SELinux does what it's supposed to, it's enabled. Permissive - SELinux pretends to work, so you can log things, and then use the logs to work out how to change your rules so that failing things will work when SELinux is re-enabled. Disabled - SELinux does nothing. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.9-73.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: HiJacking Threads -- apology new (OT??) question
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 20:38 +, Beartooth wrote: I also want to ask a question I haven't seen yet in this thread. Suppose I happen on a new fact that sends *me* off on a tangent -- something I've long meant to ask about, but not really relevant to the thread. (Here, for instance,it might be Things the Uninitiated Need to Know and Never Get Told.) To do it, I naturally ought to start a new thread -- but also give the passage about the *In* Reply-to header, with credit to P O'C and what would be a bibliographic footnote if we were doing this in old- fashioned paper journals. Common sense would dictate that it's either a reply, or it's not. If it's in reply to the prior message, than write it as a reply. If it's not in reply, even if it's something that's been inspired by another message, then it's a *new* message. If you need to refer to something from another message, then there's several ways of doing so: * Simply quote the part of the message concerned. * Write something like, See Fred's message on Tuesday re threading into your message. That allows people to find it. * Find the URI for the message on the Fedora archive, and include that in your message. * Write the message ID for it into your message. Though, it's a long time since I've come across a client that could find a message for you from a quoted message ID (it'd find it in your local cache of messages, after left- or right-clicking on the ID). I think it was a usenet client on the Amiga, or perhaps Forte Inc's Agent, that could do that. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.9-73.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Unrecognized Hard Drive
Tim: /me wonders whether warming them up, first, would have helped? Mikkel L. Ellertson: It might have - stick it in an oven or something. On the other hand, it might have cause other problems. What I think was happening is that the bearing lubrication had gotten into places it should not have, and then prevented the drive from starting to spin up. The jolt freed thing up enough to get the drive spinning. It also freed the head to move as well. I was thinking of metal contraction as it cools down seizing the moving parts into position (remembering my days back in school of being told not to leave the vices tightened up overnight). Of course warming them up would have to be to a sensible temperature. Warming them up to normal operating temperatures, not roasting them. ;-) I get odd looks when I tap the back of a screwdriver with another one, with the first one's point in the slot, to loosen up stuck bolts. But the principle's the same, you're trying to free up a moving part that's jammed, but with the minimal amount of force that's required. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.9-73.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to Burn a Music DVD on K3B
Jorge Fábregas wrote: On Saturday 03 January 2009 12:43:22 pm Jim wrote: K3B only has a selection for burning a Audio CD Project 80 min. I want to burn Audio to a DVD 4gig, no what I do it holds me to 80 min. which is a Cd. You can't do that, AFAIK. An Audio CD is a standard (search for Red Book standard) and it doesn't work with recordable DVD's. Now, if you want to burn a DVD with music content (e.g. MP3, AAC files etc) that's another story...and that's where you would select Create DATA DVD on K3B. And of course you can burn a DVD full of CD-style audio (44.1kHz, 2 channels, 16-bit sample WAV files), but there's not any real point. Ogg Vorbis or FLAC are better choices. Matt Flaschen -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Yum problem on F10
Apologies in advance if this gets through twice - I posted this about 24 hours ago, have not yet seen it on the list, and just got a bounce message, so I assume that the first try won't get through. -- I have three machines on which I installed f10 about 2 weeks ago. Two of them are identical as to hardware and the other is a bit larger and faster. All are x86_64 machines previously running fedora 7, 8, or 9. On two of the machines I wiped the drive on which I installed /, /tmp, /usr, and /var, and on the third (the 'larger' machine) I added a new 1TB drive to hold those (plus other things). The install - using the same install DVD - went smoothly on all 3 of them. However, on two of the machines (one of the twins and the larger box) yum works just fine. On the third - which according to rpm -qa has exactly the same packages installed - yum fails every time with a message public key for rpm name is not installed. Obviously I have hosed up something here on that third machine, but I haven't found it yet and it's driving me batty. I have gone through documentation until I'm going blind without picking up a clue. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Feel free to write me privately if you prefer and I'll summarize for the list later. Thanks - wwa -- william w. austin waus...@speakeasy.net life is just another phase i'm going through. this time, anyway ... -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Upgrade Caused Downgrade
ETPoole60 wrote: All, I've just experienced one of the most unnerving situations. I've a custom built machine that was running the following: ECS GeForce 6100SM-M mother board AMD 64 X2 5600+ 4GB RAM DDR2 800 nVidia GT7300 PCIE 256MB video card 2 - SATA Hard drives; 1 - 320 GB WD and 1 - 500GB Seagate 550 watt Antec power supply Fedora 9 x86_64 with all of the latest patches For Xmas I upgraded the machine to: Gigabyte MA790X-DS4 mother board AMD Phenom Quad core 9550 8GB RAM DDR2 800 Retained the video card from above 2 - SATA Hard drives; 1 - 500 GB Seagate and 1 - 1TB Seagate 850 watt Antec power supply I attempted to install, from the same DVD used above, Fedora 9 x86_64 with 4 failures at just about the same place while installing packages. I used my i386 Fedora 9 DVD and all went well during the install so attempted to do a upgrade to x86_64 without luck. I did a test using my Fedora 8 x86_64 DVD and it installed perfectly. I then attempted to do a upgrade to Fedora 9 without any luck (it appeared to fail at about the same place). I then downloaded and burned another copy of the Fedora 9 x86_64 DVD, checked it and attempted to do another install and one again it failed at about the same place. What could possibly be happening? I since reinstall Fedora 8, but that has reached it's E-O-L. Should I just attempt to go to Fedora 10 x86_64? Any help or advice would be great! You knowif you tell people where about the same place is and the errors you are getting someone may be able to help you. What could possibly be happening? I don't know about anyone elsebut I can't guess based on what you've said. -- I've always made it a solemn practice to never drink anything stronger than tequila before breakfast. -- R. Nesson mei-mei.gres...@greshko.com http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Upgrade Caused Downgrade
Ed Greshko wrote: You knowif you tell people where about the same place is and the errors you are getting someone may be able to help you. I agree. You've provided lots of information about your hardware, which is helpful. But you need to also note the text of the errors, and relevant context. Matt Flaschen -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [Ambassadors] Re: Picture Book....
--- On Fri, 1/2/09, Max Spevack mspev...@redhat.com wrote: I don't see any reason why not. We just want to make sure we know who is holding the money, and how much there ends up being. I think it's a pretty simple straightforward problem to solve. If I may jump in on this for a moment. The only way we would ever sell or handle any books ourselves, would be if we chose to buy them from Lightning Source and sell them. Otherwise all sales would be handled by Lightning Source and they would provide us with strict accounting for each sale. They are a division of Ingram Book Services, which handles half the books in the world and is a multi-billion dollar enterprise. Once the book(s) are in the Ingram database, we can just direct any buyers to Amazon, Wal-mart, any book store with a computer, and a zillion other on-line vendors. Lightning Source would then send us a royalty check, I think it's every three months. We can just have them send it to Max and he can disburse any funds. Also, I have a bunch of documents that Lightning Source sent me. They are pretty thorough in breaking down the costs and establishing what we can expect from them. I tried to send them to some people over the mailing lists email, but the file size was to big and it crashed. I also sent them to Ian, so if anyone wants a copy, they would need to provide him or I with a outside email address. -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
Re: Picture Book....
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 08:53:19AM +0100, Max Spevack wrote: I (along with the CommArch budget) am happy to help with accounting to whatever extent I am needed. Woo! Get your name on the people list. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Picture_book -- Ian Weller ianwel...@gmail.com http://ianweller.org GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36 Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet. ~ Douglas Adams pgpZhnsgYMPpg.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
Re: [Ambassadors] Re: Picture Book....
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 07:45:45AM -0800, Doug Berry wrote: I don't see any reason why not. We just want to make sure we know who is holding the money, and how much there ends up being. I think it's a pretty simple straightforward problem to solve. If I may jump in on this for a moment. The only way we would ever sell or handle any books ourselves, would be if we chose to buy them from Lightning Source and sell them. Otherwise all sales would be handled by Lightning Source and they would provide us with strict accounting for each sale. They are a division of Ingram Book Services, which handles half the books in the world and is a multi-billion dollar enterprise. Once the book(s) are in the Ingram database, we can just direct any buyers to Amazon, Wal-mart, any book store with a computer, and a zillion other on-line vendors. Do we want to set up a website somewhere and point shoppers to Amazon.com or whatnot? (Gah, I'm thinking way too far ahead again) Lightning Source would then send us a royalty check, I think it's every three months. We can just have them send it to Max and he can disburse any funds. You OK with this, Max? We could just plan for this, and it would make me feel a lot better if we got this problem out of the way first ^_^ Also, I have a bunch of documents that Lightning Source sent me. They are pretty thorough in breaking down the costs and establishing what we can expect from them. I tried to send them to some people over the mailing lists email, but the file size was to big and it crashed. I also sent them to Ian, so if anyone wants a copy, they would need to provide him or I with a outside email address. I've placed them here: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/lsi-docs/ braindump type=mine! So here's what I'm thinking initially: we publish four books (Volumes 1-4), each entitled something like The Fedora Book: Friends, or whatever, for each of the four foundations (freedom, friends, features, first). Each book would contain about 80 pages. (LSI requires page counts in multiples of 4; for reference, The Love Book has 96 pages.) If we go less than 80 pages, we can't put text on the spine (which would definitely help in identifying the book on a shelf with four or so different copies of The Fedora Book). 80 pages: (odd pages on right side, even on left) 1. Title page 2. Copyright (CC-BY-SA, right?)/cataloging data 3-4. Introduction by current FPL (if Paul doesn't take up two pages, make page 3 blank) 5. Introduction of the foundation whose story is being told in this book, with wonderful Four Foundations livery provided by Mo 6-77. Photos and stories of contributors 78-79. Index of contributors across all books published so far 80. Left blank because LSI told us to (they stick an internal barcode on here) I envision the pages being in full color. LSI will print a full color book, sized 8.5 x 8.5 (whoa, another parallel to The Love Book!) with 80 pages, for $8.20 per unit (book). Setup for the title comes out to $75 (half for the cover, half for the pages), and to make the book available to Amazon and the like, we are charged $12/yr for each ISBN. Add to this cost the necessity of getting a proof for each individual book. For an 80-page book, this would be $22.20. And, we need ISBNs. Doug mentioned this would be $275 for a block of 10 ISBNs. The initial cost, then, is $711.80 for the four books. Setting the wholesale markup to $15 keeps the price reasonable for both buyers and us -- we can recoup the cost for all four books with 105 sales.[1] Add to this an additional $48/yr after the first year -- and remember, this isn't including any additional books that we may want to produce after these four. Also, keep in mind that we still have six more ISBNs to do whatever with. The initial cost for the next six books would be $87 plus $12 per year after the first year. [1]: This is overall sales of all the four books, not each one. (For those who may be wondering where any of this information is, it's not in the POD manual (USOPSMANUAL080108.pdf), it's in US COLOR PRICE SHEET 091508.pdf.) I would like to mention that the proposal Doug emailed to me pertains to only one book, while this pertains to an initial four. /braindump Questions I have for you guys: 1. Does this sound reasonable? Does it seem viable that we can sell 105 copies in a year? For those who will be in the book, or other Fedora contributors, or other Fedora fans, the $60 for the first set of four price seems a bit large. I'm not really sure. 2. On a totally unrelated note, where are we going to stick all of the photos for this project? We need somewhere where we can also enter their story, and where others can upload their photos into a moderation queue. Flickr is what I see in my mind as being the least trouble, but it's not open source, and most of the photograhpers would need a pro account ($30something/yr) to
Fedora Project Marketing Team
To whom it may concern, My name is Clinton Zeimet, and I am from Mason City, Iowa, in the United States of America. I work for Target Corporation in Guest Services, and also work as part time staff at The Music Man Square (a local tourist attraction). I also serve as a volunteer coordinator for the Iowa Independent Film Festival. My goal in the Fedora Project is to participate on a more active level in the marketing of this wonderful operating system and its vibrant community. I would like to engage in formal public discourse as an official ambassador to deliver an enthusiastic and project-aligned messaging to the public. I believe that as general computer users experience the marvelous advantages of the Fedora Operating system and its accompanying community, they will likely become as joyful as I to experience an alternative to the status quo disappointments of its closed source relatives. I would like to see usage of the Fedora OS and participation in the Fedora Project to extend further into the greater public consciousness of my locale region, and also internationally. I would also like to see Fedora and the Fedora Project become ever more attuned to the practicable needs and wants of the general computer user like me. As a former children's camp counselor and current guest services specialist and event coordinator, I believe I have the proven ability to deliver the Fedora marketing package in an effective manner. In addition, my experience as a local contributor to the U.S. presidential campaign of Howard Dean in 2004 acclimated me to the practical organizational challenges of marketing and its accompanying intangible rewards. I also have experience in team sports, theatrical productions, speech contests, writers workshops, and student government and peer counseling positions that have prepared to be an effective group participant and team player. Other than these skills, it should be known that I have no formal marketing education at the college level. I also have the native attributes of intellectual curiosity and above average ability in verbal and quantitative performance, which I would like to employ to learn more technical Linux skills as time goes on. Thank you for considering me to join the Fedora Project in a more active manner that will match my enthusiasm and abilities. Sincerely, Clinton Zeimet -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
[Fedora-music-list] Music Makers! test request for audacity (1.3.5 beta) with pulseaudio I/O support
Hi, Audacity now supports I/O via pulseaudio, but needs wider testing. If you can: yum --enablerepo=updates-testing install audacity alsa-plugins-pulseaudio or if it isn't there yet, grab it from koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=76957 any comments, success or trouble can be added to: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/audacity-1.3.5-0.9.beta.fc10 Cheers, David Timms. ___ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
Re: [Fedora-music-list] Music Makers! test request for audacity (1.3.5 beta) with pulseaudio I/O support
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:31:35 +1100, David wrote: Hi, Audacity now supports I/O via pulseaudio, but needs wider testing. If you can: yum --enablerepo=updates-testing install audacity alsa-plugins-pulseaudio or if it isn't there yet, grab it from koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=76957 any comments, success or trouble can be added to: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/audacity-1.3.5-0.9.beta.fc10 Latency. Noisy clicks during playback. Flickering input/output levels, and a playback time indicator that doesn't move smoothly. I still think Audacity upstream should have been asked prior to applying this patch. ___ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
rpms/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.14, 1.15 perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec, 1.21, 1.22 sources, 1.14, 1.15
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9541
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec sources
Log Message:
* Fri Jan 02 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.77-1
- Upstream update.
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- .cvsignore 20 Dec 2008 06:39:51 - 1.14
+++ .cvsignore 3 Jan 2009 05:47:13 - 1.15
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-0.76.tar.gz
+Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-0.77.tar.gz
Index: perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon/F-10/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22
--- perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec 20 Dec 2008 06:39:51 - 1.21
+++ perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec 3 Jan 2009 05:47:13 - 1.22
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon
-Version: 0.76
+Version: 0.77
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Extract translatable strings from source
License: MIT
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jan 02 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.77-1
+- Upstream update.
+
* Sat Dec 20 2008 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.76-1
- Upstream update.
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- sources 20 Dec 2008 06:39:51 - 1.14
+++ sources 3 Jan 2009 05:47:14 - 1.15
@@ -1 +1 @@
-e76a50a9935ab607bc06f13028bb364f Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-0.76.tar.gz
+622dada722fb6db0e49e453c843af83c Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-0.77.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon/F-9 .cvsignore, 1.14, 1.15 perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec, 1.21, 1.22 sources, 1.14, 1.15
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10903
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec sources
Log Message:
* Fri Jan 02 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.77-1
- Upstream update.
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon/F-9/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- .cvsignore 20 Dec 2008 06:39:51 - 1.14
+++ .cvsignore 3 Jan 2009 05:52:12 - 1.15
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-0.76.tar.gz
+Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-0.77.tar.gz
Index: perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon/F-9/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22
--- perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec 20 Dec 2008 06:39:51 - 1.21
+++ perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec 3 Jan 2009 05:52:12 - 1.22
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon
-Version: 0.76
+Version: 0.77
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Extract translatable strings from source
License: MIT
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jan 02 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.77-1
+- Upstream update.
+
* Sat Dec 20 2008 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.76-1
- Upstream update.
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon/F-9/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- sources 20 Dec 2008 06:39:51 - 1.14
+++ sources 3 Jan 2009 05:52:12 - 1.15
@@ -1 +1 @@
-e76a50a9935ab607bc06f13028bb364f Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-0.76.tar.gz
+622dada722fb6db0e49e453c843af83c Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-0.77.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 478707] New: perl-Config-General-2.42 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Config-General-2.42 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478707 Summary: perl-Config-General-2.42 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/FEver OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Config-General AssignedTo: ville.sky...@iki.fi ReportedBy: fevap...@o2.pl QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, ville.sky...@iki.fi Classification: Fedora perl-Config-General-2.42 is already available. Repo version is 2.40. Please update the package. If you have any questions or suggestions related to Fever, feel free to write them in this bug or have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/FEver Don't send any messages to fevapp at o2.pl please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
