Failed Updates
Due to some issues with internal mirroring, Fedora has not been able to update its tiered mirrors since Saturday due to high load averages on its master server. This has caused issues with many public mirrors not being in sync, and causing users to be unable to install updates or newer software. Our primary mirror people are aware of the issue and are working on it. While we are working on workarounds at this moment, we have no ETA of when the problem will be corrected. Currently the issue seems to primarily affect i386 users and will have the symptoms of yum or PackageKit errors in trying to install new software. To follow updates on this problem, please see ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1531 -Mike -- fedora-announce-list mailing list fedora-announce-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
Re: Heads UP - PHP 5.3.0 in rawhide with new ABI/API.
Le 13/07/2009 03:17, Jon Ciesla a écrit : - php-mhash (not maintained) Is it possible to keep this? I have a package that depends on it, and there may be others, though I have not checked. $ repoquery --whatrequires php-mhash php-pear-Net-DNS-0:1.0.0-3.fc11.noarch limph-0:1.9.5-4.fc11.noarch limph-hostagent-0:1.9.5-4.fc11.noarch php-pear-Crypt-CHAP-0:1.0.1-2.fc11.noarch php-pear-Auth-RADIUS-0:1.0.6-2.fc11.noarch If not, is there a replacement, or would you recommend that I construct and submit for review my own package for it? This extension is not maintained, removed from main php and not transferred to PECL. The recommended new hash solution is HASH, see http://fr2.php.net/mhash http://fr2.php.net/hash The other solution is to become upstream for mhash ;) Remi. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: non-blocking dbus server
On 07/10/2009 06:20 PM, Colin Walters wrote: Your options are: 1) Method returns work item id, send a signal WorkDone with the id This was my first idea.. 2) Agent pattern, the server makes calls back to the client using its unique name. Sounds good, will take a look at this. 3) Infinite timeouts on method calls is in dbus git master I don't see how this could help me, I don't have problem with timeout, but the problem is blocked server during the method call. Thanks for the hints, Jirka begin:vcard fn:Jiri Moskovcak n:Moskovcak;Jiri email;internet:jmosk...@redhat.com x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
$HOME/bin
Hi all, I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? Stefan -- Stefan Assmann | Red Hat GmbH Software Engineer | Otto-Hahn-Strasse 20, 85609 Dornach | HR: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 153243 | GF: Brendan Lane, Charlie Peters, sassmann at redhat.com | Michael Cunningham, Charles Cachera -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 13:31 +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote: Hi all, I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? Stefan Hi, because most people don't need it? Well, I would not be exactly against making this default, but I'm not sure if $HOME/bin would be the right one... Since xdg-dirs came around I use $HOME/Applications/bin for that purpose to keep $HOME cleaner (even though this particular directory isn't in the scheme...) But I cannot really argue either way... Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
Hi, I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? Stefan Hi, because most people don't need it? True. Look at your /etc/profile (or ~/.bash_profile, I don't remember). There should be something like: [ -d ~/bin ] PATH=~/bin:$PATH Which means that the folder will be added to your PATH if it exists. I'm on Windows XP right now, so I can't verify it, but iirc there's something like that. -- Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
Stefan Assmann wrote: Hi all, I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? $HOME/bin is not on every system and the other default directories in default PATH are(at least on the most of systems ;) ). However, some Linux distros do add something as: # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists if [ -d $HOME/bin ] ; then PATH=$HOME/bin:$PATH fi as default - so this dir gets added automatically when does exist. I'm generally +1 for changing the default that way - as it would not change anything for users without that directory. Greetings, Ondřej Vašík signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
Hey, Am Montag, den 13.07.2009, 14:08 +0200 schrieb Ondřej Vašík: Stefan Assmann wrote: Hi all, I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? $HOME/bin is not on every system and the other default directories in default PATH are(at least on the most of systems ;) ). However, some Linux distros do add something as: # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists if [ -d $HOME/bin ] ; then PATH=$HOME/bin:$PATH fi Adding something like this raises security concerns, as this opens doors for malicious software. E.g. some application could but a binary named bash in ~/bin, which would be run before /bin/bash. So, if at all, let's use $PATH:$HOME/PATH - fabian as default - so this dir gets added automatically when does exist. I'm generally +1 for changing the default that way - as it would not change anything for users without that directory. Greetings, Ondřej Vašík -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:08:55PM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote: Stefan Assmann wrote: Hi all, I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? $HOME/bin is not on every system and the other default directories in default PATH are(at least on the most of systems ;) ). However, some Linux distros do add something as: # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists if [ -d $HOME/bin ] ; then PATH=$HOME/bin:$PATH fi as default - so this dir gets added automatically when does exist. I'm generally +1 for changing the default that way - as it would not change anything for users without that directory. I would only want this at the *end* of the current PATH, not the beginning, for obvious security reasons. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
* Stefan Assmann [13/07/2009 13:53] : I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? [m...@orient ~]$ rpm -q fedora-release fedora-release-11-1.noarch [m...@orient ~]$ rpm -qf /etc/skel/.bash_profile bash-4.0-6.fc11.i586 [m...@orient ~]$ rpm -qV bash-4.0-6.fc11.i586 [m...@orient ~]$ grep PATH /etc/skel/.bash_profile PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin export PATH Emmanuel -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
If you're interested in this seat, please email me. I would be interested. Dunno if my geolocation helps or not. Jens -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: RFC: cronKit
Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 22:22 +0200 schrieb Christoph Wickert: Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 22:09 +0200 schrieb Christoph Höger: Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 22:04 +0200 schrieb Christoph Höger: Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 01:54 +0200 schrieb Christoph Wickert: How about http://www.gnomefiles.org/app.php/DoThisNow Looks, good, thanks Christoph. Darn. Not free. Sorry about that, I didn't notice. Time for a free port I think ;) Yes, after my exam in SOA, I can definetely need something to work on besides my thesis. That will fit that hole. I'll still need to see what language and tools I'll use. signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fail2ban + Shorewall Question
I maintain fail2ban for EPEL, I can just take the Fedora package as well unless someone else has a relatively high interest in doing so (I purely maintain it for EPEL because we use it at work on our servers and Axel said he had no interest in packaging it for EPEL). I've needed to contact Axel in the past and he was very responsive so I wasn't aware there were any issues with his participation in the project. -Adam -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
Paul W. Frields wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:08:55PM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote: Stefan Assmann wrote: Hi all, I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? $HOME/bin is not on every system and the other default directories in default PATH are(at least on the most of systems ;) ). However, some Linux distros do add something as: # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists if [ -d $HOME/bin ] ; then PATH=$HOME/bin:$PATH fi as default - so this dir gets added automatically when does exist. I'm generally +1 for changing the default that way - as it would not change anything for users without that directory. I would only want this at the *end* of the current PATH, not the beginning, for obvious security reasons. 1. Your practice to a wide extend defeats one prime rationale for ~/bin: Replacing/Overriding vendor-provided applications by per-user installed versions. 2. Unless using ~/bin as root, these files are user-installed binaries, which under normal circumstances may only have security impacts on user files = What you call obvious security reasons are minor concerns. The only real issue you are solving by appending ~/bin instead of prepending ~/bin to $PATH is avoiding application-name conflicts. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
Paul W. Frields wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:08:55PM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote: Stefan Assmann wrote: Hi all, I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? $HOME/bin is not on every system and the other default directories in default PATH are(at least on the most of systems ;) ). However, some Linux distros do add something as: # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists if [ -d $HOME/bin ] ; then PATH=$HOME/bin:$PATH fi as default - so this dir gets added automatically when does exist. I'm generally +1 for changing the default that way - as it would not change anything for users without that directory. I would only want this at the *end* of the current PATH, not the beginning, for obvious security reasons. 1. Your practice to a wide extend defeats one prime rationale for ~/bin: Replacing/Overriding vendor-provided applications by per-user installed versions. 2. Unless using ~/bin as root, these files are user-installed binaries, which under normal circumstances may only have security impacts on user files = What you call obvious security reasons are minor concerns. if su (instead of su -) is used, root will inherit user's environment including PATH. The only real issue you are solving by appending ~/bin instead of prepending ~/bin to $PATH is avoiding application-name conflicts. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
System-Config-Selinux package review
Hello Fedora developers, I'm Christopher Pardy I'll be spending the summer interning at redhat working on Selinux. I'm not sure if I've gone through all the nessesary steps for this, if I haven't please point me to them. I've recently finished splitting off some code from policycoreutils to allow our packages to better conform with the upstream code. I submitted a package review request for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 This is my first package and I'm sure there's tons of issues with it and I would like to get most of them cleared up by the end of the summer. Again if there is any steps I'm missing please let me know. Christopher Pardy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
Michal Hlavinka wrote: Paul W. Frields wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:08:55PM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote: Stefan Assmann wrote: Hi all, I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? $HOME/bin is not on every system and the other default directories in default PATH are(at least on the most of systems ;) ). However, some Linux distros do add something as: # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists if [ -d $HOME/bin ] ; then PATH=$HOME/bin:$PATH fi as default - so this dir gets added automatically when does exist. I'm generally +1 for changing the default that way - as it would not change anything for users without that directory. I would only want this at the *end* of the current PATH, not the beginning, for obvious security reasons. 1. Your practice to a wide extend defeats one prime rationale for ~/bin: Replacing/Overriding vendor-provided applications by per-user installed versions. 2. Unless using ~/bin as root, these files are user-installed binaries, which under normal circumstances may only have security impacts on user files = What you call obvious security reasons are minor concerns. if su (instead of su -) is used, root will inherit user's environment including PATH. Yes, but ... we are talking about ordinary users here, not about users who have root access. These people have other means to install packages. For ordinary users, prepending ~/bin to $PATH is the only approach e.g. to replace vendor-supplied applications, the security risks are almost non-existent. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: System-Config-Selinux package review
[08:46:58][a...@turnip][src]+ rpmlint scselinux.spec scselinux.spec:91: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scselinux scselinux.spec:92: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scselinux/* scselinux.spec:93: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scselinux-0.1-py2.6.egg-info scselinux.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 61, tab: line 1) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. First thing I would do is handle the rpmlint errors. These are the documents you are probably going to be most interested in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -Adam -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
On Mon July 13 2009, Michal Hlavinka wrote: if su (instead of su -) is used, root will inherit user's environment including PATH. So why should a malicious user be able to change the contents of ~/bin, but not set the variable PATH to an arbitrary value? Regards Till signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
Stefan Assmann sassm...@redhat.com writes: I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? It should be there, but some kind of bug prevents evaluation of ~/.bash_profile (which adds this directory to $PATH). $ echo $PATH /home/ensc/bin:/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/games press alt-shift-f2 - starts the xfrun4 Run program application) $ ps wwwe `/sbin/pidof xfrun4` 4220 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/xfrun4 --daemon ... PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/games It's probably some kind of undebuggable d-bus interaction :( Hence, use xterm to start your applications, but not this buggy desktop crap. Enrico -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
* Ralf Corsepius [13/07/2009 15:50] : For ordinary users, prepending ~/bin to $PATH is the only approach e.g. to replace vendor-supplied applications, the security risks are almost non-existent. You can also use bash aliases to override binary calls. Emmanuel -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Help on CMake usage (read gecko's libdir variable)
Hi, The package chmsee used to need a patch to read libdir variable. The original patch can be found here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303660 of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/427622 Now latest chmsee switched to use CMake instead. I cannot figure out how to apply such a patch. Anyone can help? -- bbbush ^_^ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
Emmanuel Seyman wrote: * Ralf Corsepius [13/07/2009 15:50] : For ordinary users, prepending ~/bin to $PATH is the only approach e.g. to replace vendor-supplied applications, the security risks are almost non-existent. You can also use bash aliases to override binary calls. Sometimes, but not always. e.g. when testing application suites which install many binaries. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
On 13.07.2009 14:28, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: * Stefan Assmann [13/07/2009 13:53] : I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that by default? [m...@orient ~]$ rpm -q fedora-release fedora-release-11-1.noarch [m...@orient ~]$ rpm -qf /etc/skel/.bash_profile bash-4.0-6.fc11.i586 [m...@orient ~]$ rpm -qV bash-4.0-6.fc11.i586 [m...@orient ~]$ grep PATH /etc/skel/.bash_profile PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin export PATH Emmanuel Thanks for pointing this out! .bash_profile was missing in my home directory, not sure why. Stefan -- Stefan Assmann | Red Hat GmbH Software Engineer | Otto-Hahn-Strasse 20, 85609 Dornach | HR: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 153243 | GF: Brendan Lane, Charlie Peters, sassmann at redhat.com | Michael Cunningham, Charles Cachera -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: %{_global_cflags}
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:31:34 +0200, Marcus wrote:
Hi all.
In http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros
%{_global_cflags} is set and %{_optflags} references
%{__global_cflags} (double underscores). Is this correct or should it
say %{_global_cflags}?
%{optflags} and %{__global_cflags}
$ rpm --eval %optflags
-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=generic
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables
$ rpm --eval %__global_cflags
-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: wine applications
On Sat, July 11, 2009 8:35 pm, David wrote: I am serious here. Really. The names are...? See http://appdb.winehq.org/ -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Possible packages...
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 20:15 -0600, Nathanael Noblet wrote: Apple's Calendar Server. It runs using python 2.5 or greater (I've installed it on a F11 machine and it work well). I've started looking at some of its dependancies. 90% of them are in fedora already, and of the ones in F11, only one if I remember correctly isn't at the version it requires). It seems like a great addition to Fedora if you ask me. So basically it would require two new packages, and an update to one other package (libevent) which is a minor version bump it seems if at all needed. The Infrastructure group has a rather ongoing project to try and find a really good calendar server system (and then, obviously, package it) to be used as the official Fedora calendaring system (then we could schedule events and all that good stuff in an official Fedora server, and people could access them via CalDAV or web, and all would be roses). It's proved a bit tricky, though, to find a really perfect option. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Test/Calendering_Solution for most of the details on this project. At present, we seem to be looking at one called Calagator: http://calagator.org/ . PS3MediaServer. A Java program to talk to a PS3 with DLNA. I'm guessing this one would have problems because it requires ffmpeg or mplayer/mencoder... Plus as a java program its probably a bit more complex to create a proper spec file for. I've made the other kind often enough, but java ones not so much... There's a sort of 'agreed-upon-right-way-of-doing-this' candidate for this particular need, which is a nice modern GTK+ app and based on gstreamer...but I can't quite pull the name out of long-term storage at present. Someone will probably know what I mean, though. The one most people use (as the one I'm talking about is still a bit alpha) is mediatomb, which is also in Fedora already. Unless this provides something significant the other options don't, it may not be the best place to start, since it looks a bit complex. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Update startup-notification to version 0.10
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 10:05 -0400, Michal Nowak wrote: Awesome Window Manager [0] requires startup-notification of version 0.10 [1], I filled bug for it [3], however, no action was taken so far. Can some of you desktop folks bump the version, please? Done -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 03:54:51PM +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote: $ echo $PATH /home/ensc/bin:/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/games press alt-shift-f2 - starts the xfrun4 Run program application) $ ps wwwe `/sbin/pidof xfrun4` 4220 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/xfrun4 --daemon ... PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/games .bash_profile is only evaluated for login shells. It's probably some kind of undebuggable d-bus interaction :( Hence, use xterm to start your applications, but not this buggy desktop crap. It seems to be working as expected, given the implementation. Please don't blame parts of the software stack just because you don't understand them - it doesn't provide much incentive to improve things. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 19:06 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Matthew Woehlke writes: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: In a couple of years Microsoft is bought by Fu-Bar Inc and there goes the promise down the drain. ...if only. The odds of *any* company that might buy out M$ (well, if it isn't started by Gates and/or Ballmer and/or such) being as bad as M$ have got to be pretty high ;-). If you want legal advice, pay a lawyer. This is not legal advice. Microsoft's statement is what's generally called covenant not to sue. When Right. This is the form of words I was going to bring up. I thought the difference between a grant of rights and a 'covenant not to sue' was fairly well-established and non-controversial, since that's the exact loophole in GPLv2 that Microsoft drove the Novell agreement through, and the main reason that GPLv3 exists. I remember the point being discussed and explained at tedious length around the time that was going on. So it seems a bit odd to have this long thread with some people arguing that a 'covenant not to sue' and a 'grant of rights to use a patent' are the same thing, when it seems a fairly well-established principle, accepted on all sides, that they're not. (I echo Sam's disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer and this isn't legal advice). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Display Configuration test day summary
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:42 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: We've had the first 'Fit and Finish' test day on display configuration yesterday. I'd like to thank everybody who came by on irc and tested something, or filed a bug. If you could not make it, our test cases are still available here: Thanks for organizing this, looks like it went off really well. Sorry I couldn't be there, I was on vacation last week. I'll try to be at the next one. Great job! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 14:07 +0200, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: Look at your /etc/profile (or ~/.bash_profile, I don't remember). There should be something like: [ -d ~/bin ] PATH=~/bin:$PATH Which means that the folder will be added to your PATH if it exists. Well, I have there PATH=$PATH:$HOME/Applications/bin and that's because I added it manually there... I don't remember the original value. Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
Matthew Garrett m...@redhat.com writes: press alt-shift-f2 - starts the xfrun4 Run program application) $ ps wwwe `/sbin/pidof xfrun4` 4220 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/xfrun4 --daemon ... PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/games .bash_profile is only evaluated for login shells. How else is the program environment (e.g. $http_proxy or $PATH) supposed to be set for applications started by the Run program desktop feature? And -- I want it to be consistent across xterm, the xfce4-panel buttons (which both have the bash profile environment) and Run program. It's probably some kind of undebuggable d-bus interaction :( Hence, use xterm to start your applications, but not this buggy desktop crap. It seems to be working as expected, given the implementation. Most computer languages guarantee that everything works as expected, given its implementation. But this does not mean that it works correctly. Enrico -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
F-11 updates seem hosed today
(Not sure if this is the right list to complain on, but ...) Trying to do a routine yum update on an F-11 x86 machine is not working today. It successfully downloaded a bunch of packages, but cannot find these: Error Downloading Packages: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586: failure: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586: failure: farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') 12:dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586: failure: dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gnome-common-2.26.0-2.fc11.noarch: failure: gnome-common-2.26.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586: failure: alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586: failure: gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586: failure: gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') I don't see any way to ask yum to ignore these packages and apply the updates it did get, either ... regards, tom lane -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F-11 updates seem hosed today
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Tom Lanet...@redhat.com wrote: (Not sure if this is the right list to complain on, but ...) Trying to do a routine yum update on an F-11 x86 machine is not working today. It successfully downloaded a bunch of packages, but cannot find these: Error Downloading Packages: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586: failure: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586: failure: farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') 12:dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586: failure: dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gnome-common-2.26.0-2.fc11.noarch: failure: gnome-common-2.26.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586: failure: alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586: failure: gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586: failure: gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') I don't see any way to ask yum to ignore these packages and apply the updates it did get, either ... I had issues this morning but eventually got all but one alsa update which I just used a --exclude to get around. Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F-11 updates seem hosed today
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 13/07/2009 20:36, Tom Lane a écrit : (Not sure if this is the right list to complain on, but ...) Trying to do a routine yum update on an F-11 x86 machine is not working today. It successfully downloaded a bunch of packages, but cannot find these: Yeah, a bug has been filed at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510898 for this. I guess we just have to wait for the mirrors to sync to the right content ... - -- Dodji Seketeli Red Hat -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkpbf3IACgkQPejI7lrem2EjuQCgppHSF1zzH7P8CBaZVuFUbool /wcAnRoZocAyKQlLtDEnme0/gaYSLKcG =n0bC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F-11 updates seem hosed today
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Tom Lane wrote: (Not sure if this is the right list to complain on, but ...) Trying to do a routine yum update on an F-11 x86 machine is not working today. It successfully downloaded a bunch of packages, but cannot find these: Error Downloading Packages: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586: failure: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586: failure: farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') 12:dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586: failure: dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gnome-common-2.26.0-2.fc11.noarch: failure: gnome-common-2.26.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586: failure: alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586: failure: gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586: failure: gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') I don't see any way to ask yum to ignore these packages and apply the updates it did get, either ... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510898 -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rpm %defattr question
On Sunday 12 July 2009, Jussi Lehtola wrote: is the default attribute definition %defattr(-,root,root) the same as %defattr(-,root,root,-)? Currently yes, the latter is just more explicit. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Release Engineering meeting summary for 2009-07-13
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-13/fedora-meeting.2009-07-13-18.25.html Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-13/fedora-meeting.2009-07-13-18.25.log.html Meeting log --- * **F12 Schedule** (f13-18:30:06_) * *LINK*: http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f12-releng-updated-version-2009-07-13.txt is the current iteration (f13-18:31:26_) * *AGREED*: Mass branch will happen just prior (day before) to final freeze (f13-18:51:29_) * *AGREED*: bodhi will accept/push updates as of 2009-10-21 which is the RC phase for the final release. (f13-18:52:23_) * *ACTION*: poelcat will add such dates to the schedule (f13-18:52:43_) * **Orphan round up** (f13-18:54:17_) * *ACTION*: jkeating will file a releng ticket to purge the orphans by feature freeze (f13-18:56:51_) * **FAD follow up** (f13-18:58:52_) * *ACTION*: f13 will spend more time on FAD follow up this week (f13-19:01:37_) * *ACTION*: f13 will file a releng ticket to purge the orphans by feature freeze (f13-19:01:47_) * **open floor** (f13-19:01:52_) * **updates pushes** (f13-19:03:59_) * *ACTION*: f13 will file a ticket to remember to back down koji signed package pruning (f13-19:04:23_) * **Critical Path** (f13-19:22:30_) * *AGREED*: Critical Path will be talked about next week (f13-19:22:51_) * **Open Floor** (f13-19:22:57_) -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:47:28AM +, Martin Sourada wrote: because most people don't need it? Well, I would not be exactly against making this default, but I'm not sure if $HOME/bin would be the right one... Since xdg-dirs came around I use $HOME/Applications/bin for that Yuck! Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:15:12PM +0200, Fabian Deutsch wrote: Adding something like this raises security concerns, as this opens doors for malicious software. E.g. some application could but a binary named bash in ~/bin, which would be run before /bin/bash. The same application could overwrite .bash_profile too. Or it would be very contrived to imagine a security hole that lets you create ~/bin and place an arbitrary binary into ~/bin/bash, but doesn't let you overwrite .bash_profile. So I don't think this is a security concern at all in the real world. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/ See what it can do: http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/recipes.html -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rawhide report: 20090713 changes
Compose started at Mon Jul 13 06:15:04 UTC 2009 New package axel Accelerated download client New package colossus Allows people to play Titan against each other or AIs New package eclipse-eclox Eclipse-based doxygen plugin New package mrepo A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources New package php-LightweightPicasaAPI A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP New package php-pecl-ncurses Terminal screen handling and optimization package New package pkcs11-helper A library for using PKCS#11 providers New package ruby-icon-artist Supporting libraries for icon artists New package samtools Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format New package trac-customfieldadmin-plugin Expose ticket custom fields via the web admin interface New package znc An advanced IRC bouncer Updated Packages: CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.54-15.fc12 -- * Mon Jul 13 2009 - Parag Nemade panem...@gmail.com - 2.8.54-15 - Rebuild against new libbfd-2.19.51.0.11-23.fc12.so DeviceKit-disks-005-3.fc12 -- * Sun Jul 12 2009 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 005-3.f12 - Rebuild backup-manager-0.7.8-4.fc12 --- * Sun Jul 12 2009 Guillaume Kulakowski guillaume DOT kulakowski AT fedoraproject DOT org - 0.7.8-4 - Bump release * Thu Jun 25 2009 Guillaume Kulakowski guillaume DOT kulakowski AT fedoraproject DOT org - 0.7.8-3 - Add dar in requierement cherokee-0.99.20-1.fc12 --- * Sat Jul 11 2009 Pavel Lisy pavel.l...@gmail.com - 0.99.20-1 - updated to 0.99.20 chmsee-1.0.6-1.fc12 --- * Sun Jul 12 2009 bbbush bbbush.y...@gmail.com - 1.0.6-1 - update to 1.0.6 - update project location. Chmsee moved to google code since 2009-01-05, co-maintained by Li Daobing and Jungle Ji - update build steps to use CMake - Chmsee 1.0.3 was released on 2009-01-10, added copy page location in context menu, updated translation - Chmsee 1.0.4 was released on 2009-03-14, added drag and drop support, dropped cs2w - Chmsee 1.0.5 was released on 2009-05-17, added fullscreen support, switched to CMake, supported 6 more new languages - Chmsee 1.0.6 was released on 2009-07-12, added index support, supported 8 more new languages e2fsprogs-1.41.8-1.fc12 --- * Sun Jul 12 2009 Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com 1.41.8-1 - New upstream version, several resize fixes. fsarchiver-0.5.8-2.fc12 --- * Sun Jul 12 2009 Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com - 0.5.8-1 - Update to 0.5.8 * Sun Jul 12 2009 Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com - 0.5.8-2 - BR libblkid-devel gerbv-2.3.0-1.fc12 -- * Sat Jul 11 2009 Chitlesh Goorah chitlesh [AT] fedoraproject DOT org - 2.3.0-1 - new upstream release gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-5.fc12 -- * Sun Jul 12 2009 Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com - 2.25.3-5 - Add patch for GNOME bug #584126 (gdl API break). gucharmap-2.26.3.1-1.fc12 - * Sun Jul 12 2009 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.26.3.1-1 - Update to 2.26.3.1 jd-2.4.1-1.fc12 --- * Sun Jul 12 2009 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 2.4.1-1 - 2.4.1 libX11-1.2.99-1.20090712.fc12 - * Sun Jul 12 2009 Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@redhat.com 1.2.99-1.20090712 - Today's git snapshot - libX11-1.2.1-indic.patch: Drop. libXi-1.2.99-4.20090713.fc12 * Mon Jul 13 2009 Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@redhat.com 1.2.99-4.20090713 - Update to today's git master - Add commitid file. * Sun Jul 12 2009 Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@redhat.com 1.2.99-3.20090712 - Update to today's git master moin-1.8.4-2.fc12 - * Sun Jul 12 2009 Ville-Pekka Vainio vpivaini AT cs.helsinki.fi 1.8.4-2 - Remove the filemanager directory from the embedded FCKeditor, it contains code with know security vulnerabilities, even though that code couldn't be invoked when moin was used with the default settings. - Fixes rhbz #509924, related to CVE-2009-2265 mono-tools-2.4.2-4.fc12 --- * Sun Jul 12 2009 Christian Krause c...@fedoraproject.org - 2.4.2-4 - Add version to requirement of gtkhtml-sharp to distinguish between gtk-sharp and gnome-desktop-sharp opengrok-0.8-0.1.20090712hg.fc12 * Sun Jul 12 2009 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk - 0.8-0.1.20090712hg - Update to latest Mercurial snapshot - bconds are nice, use them php-5.3.0-1.fc12 * Sun Jul 12 2009 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 5.3.0-1 - update to 5.3.0 - remove ncurses, dbase, mhash extensions - add enchant, sqlite3, intl, phar, fileinfo extensions - raise sqlite version to 3.6.0 (for sqlite3, build with --enable-load-extension) - sync with upstream production php.ini php-pecl-geoip-1.0.7-3.fc12 --- * Sun Jul 12 2009 Remi Collet
Alpha Blocker Bug Meeting: Friday 2009-07-17
What: F12Alpha Blocker bug meeting (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=f12alpha) When: Friday, 2009-07-17 @ 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT) Where: #fedora-bugzappers It is hard to believe, but it is already time to start getting prepared for the Alpha! For Fedora 12 we are making a concerted effort to pro-actively review the blocker bug lists on a more consistent basis. Right now the blocker bug for Fedora 12 alpha is bug free. Either this is going to be a really solid release that requires little effort... or we need to start focusing on rawhide and marking blockers as we find them :) Hope to see you on Friday. Thanks, John -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Mock issue with ifarch BuildRequires
Sorry for the cross-posting, I'm trying to get a clue...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:38 AM
Subject: Mock issue with ifarch BuildRequires
To: Discussion of Fedora build system fedora-buildsys-l...@redhat.com
I am trying to run the tests included in the BuildBot package during
the RPM build, and one of the tests requires darcs, which is built in
Fedora ExclusiveArch %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha.
Now, I'm adding to buildbot's spec[1] file an ifarch like:
%ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha
# darcs ExclusiveArchs
BuildRequires: darcs
%endif
but it seems darcs is never installed in the buildroot [2]
am I just doing something stupid or there's a bug somewhere?
[1]
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/buildbot/devel/buildbot.spec?view=log
[2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1470380name=root.log
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $HOME/bin
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:48:35PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: The same application could overwrite .bash_profile too. Or it would be very contrived to imagine a security hole that lets you create ~/bin and place an arbitrary binary into ~/bin/bash, but doesn't let you overwrite .bash_profile. So I don't think this is a security concern at all in the real world. Realistically, the concern is more likely to be binaries accidently causing subtle breakage by colliding with the expected behaviour of system utilities. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rpms/liberation-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.10, 1.11 liberation-fonts.spec, 1.39, 1.40 sources, 1.14, 1.15
Author: cchance
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5900
Modified Files:
.cvsignore liberation-fonts.spec sources
Log Message:
- Updated to upstream 1.05.1.20090713.
- Generate TTFs with traditional kern table via fontforge scripts. (rh#503430)
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11
--- .cvsignore 6 Jul 2009 06:18:39 - 1.10
+++ .cvsignore 13 Jul 2009 06:31:40 - 1.11
@@ -1 +1 @@
-liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090706.tar.gz
+liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090713.tar.gz
Index: liberation-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -p -r1.39 -r1.40
--- liberation-fonts.spec 6 Jul 2009 06:18:39 - 1.39
+++ liberation-fonts.spec 13 Jul 2009 06:31:40 - 1.40
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ New.
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts
-Version: 1.05.1.20090706
+Version: 1.05.1.20090713
Release: 1%{?dist}
# The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two
# exceptions:
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Release: 1%{?dist}
License: Liberation
Group:User Interface/X
URL: https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/
-Source0:
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090630.tar.gz
+Source0:
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot:%(mktemp -ud
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch:noarch
@@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ mkfontscale %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
rm -rf %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 13 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance k at kaio.me - 1.05.1.20090713-1.fc12
+- Updated to upstream 1.05.1.20090713.
+- Generate TTFs with traditional kern table via fontforge scripts. (rh#503430)
+
* Mon Jul 06 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance k at kaio.me - 1.05.1.20090706-1.fc12
- Updated to upstream 1.05.1.20090706.
- Reconverted from original TTF with traditional kern table. (rh#503430)
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -p -r1.14 -r1.15
--- sources 6 Jul 2009 06:18:39 - 1.14
+++ sources 13 Jul 2009 06:31:40 - 1.15
@@ -1 +1 @@
-81478594c3faa18c90638e9def41d70e liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090706.tar.gz
+97a10ca1feb065d022bb9942e21b15ad liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090713.tar.gz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 503430] Incorrect Kerning in some applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 --- Comment #21 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-07-13 02:35:21 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1470687 Tried added fmflags in fontforge script, to include old style kern table during generation from SFDs to TTFs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 503430] Incorrect Kerning in some applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 --- Comment #22 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-07-13 02:41:46 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=114049 http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/liberation-fonts/1.05.1.20090713/1.fc12/noarch/liberation-sans-fonts-1.05.1.20090713-1.fc12.noarch.rpm Please check if traditional kern table is are there. Could anyone kindly share procedures of test? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-07-13 03:05:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) From Comment #3 I have applied for Packager group and my FAS id is sandeeps. Done. Please use it wisely -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #32 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-07-13 04:57:05 EDT --- Any plans to submit this change to F-10? This would make life easier for packagers who package a new program that uses lilypond fonts. I have found a problem with F-10's emmentaler-14.otf font. As I pointed in bug 510668#c9, F-10's emmentaler-14 is missing a glyph at 0xe19d and because of that, all glyphs coming after this one is shifted by one unit. (for example: if these were regular fonts, this means that you push p button but your computer displays a q). F-11's emmentaler-14 doesn't have this problem. I think making an F-10 update would be the easiest solution as you won't need to debug this weird error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/lcdf-typetools/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 lcdf-typetools.spec, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.7, 1.8
Author: pnemade
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15280
Modified Files:
.cvsignore lcdf-typetools.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jul 13 2009 Parag Nemade pnemade AT redhat.com- 2.79-1
- Update to next upstream release 2.79
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- .cvsignore 12 Jun 2009 09:08:47 - 1.7
+++ .cvsignore 13 Jul 2009 08:58:33 - 1.8
@@ -1 +1 @@
-lcdf-typetools-2.78.tar.gz
+lcdf-typetools-2.79.tar.gz
Index: lcdf-typetools.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/devel/lcdf-typetools.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9
--- lcdf-typetools.spec 12 Jun 2009 09:05:53 - 1.8
+++ lcdf-typetools.spec 13 Jul 2009 08:58:33 - 1.9
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: lcdf-typetools
-Version: 2.78
+Version: 2.79
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Tools for manipulating OpenType fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_datadir}/lcdf-typetools
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 13 2009 Parag Nemade pnemade AT redhat.com- 2.79-1
+- Update to next upstream release 2.79
+
* Thu May 21 2009 Parag Nemade pnemade AT redhat.com- 2.78-1
- Initial specfile for Fedora
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- sources 12 Jun 2009 09:05:53 - 1.7
+++ sources 13 Jul 2009 08:58:33 - 1.8
@@ -1 +1 @@
-88418a4aca055f9911f7bb9035491feb lcdf-typetools-2.78.tar.gz
+1fb0dcb2433b03ef7ed30593bbb06612 lcdf-typetools-2.79.tar.gz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/lcdf-typetools/F-11 lcdf-typetools.spec, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.7, 1.8 dead.package, 1.1, NONE
Author: pnemade
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31899
Modified Files:
lcdf-typetools.spec sources
Removed Files:
dead.package
Log Message:
* Mon Jul 13 2009 Parag Nemade pnemade AT redhat.com- 2.79-1
- Update to next upstream release 2.79
Index: lcdf-typetools.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/F-11/lcdf-typetools.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9
--- lcdf-typetools.spec 15 Jun 2009 05:10:35 - 1.8
+++ lcdf-typetools.spec 13 Jul 2009 10:04:11 - 1.9
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: lcdf-typetools
-Version: 2.78
+Version: 2.79
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Tools for manipulating OpenType fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_datadir}/lcdf-typetools
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 13 2009 Parag Nemade pnemade AT redhat.com- 2.79-1
+- Update to next upstream release 2.79
+
* Thu May 21 2009 Parag Nemade pnemade AT redhat.com- 2.78-1
- Initial specfile for Fedora
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/F-11/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- sources 15 Jun 2009 05:10:35 - 1.7
+++ sources 13 Jul 2009 10:04:11 - 1.8
@@ -1 +1 @@
-88418a4aca055f9911f7bb9035491feb lcdf-typetools-2.78.tar.gz
+1fb0dcb2433b03ef7ed30593bbb06612 lcdf-typetools-2.79.tar.gz
--- dead.package DELETED ---
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 510921] Review Request: adf-accanthis-fonts - A “modernized” garaldic serif typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510921 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-07-13 09:15:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) + koji build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1470645 - rpmlint on SRPM errors as I am not sure what these errors are adf-accanthis-fonts.src: I: checking adf-accanthis-fonts.src: E: specfile-error error: line 41: Package does not exist: %post -n adf-accanthis-adf-accanthis-fonts This error occurred when rpmlint used rpm to query the specfile. The error is output by rpm and the message should contain more information. ... not sure why this failed. Sorry about this, I used a construct that could not work in pre-F12 distros (fontpackages-devel has some fixes in rawhide that permit stuff that was previously impossible) I've uploaded a new version, it should work in F10,11 and 12 http://nim.fedorapeople.org/adf-accanthis-fonts-1.6-2.fc12.src.rpm http://nim.fedorapeople.org/adf-accanthis-fonts.spec Apologies for wasting your time stupidly like that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 503430] Incorrect Kerning in some applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 --- Comment #23 from hdu h...@openoffice.org 2009-07-13 09:47:45 EDT --- Please check if traditional kern table is are there Sorry, they are not. Could anyone kindly share procedures of test? The quickest way to check if the table is there is by just doing hexdump -C LiberationSans-Regular.ttf which will result in something like 00 01 00 00 00 12 01 00 00 04 00 20 46 46 54 4d |... FFTM| 0010 49 21 dd a2 00 02 0f b0 00 00 00 1c 47 44 45 46 |I!..GDEF| 0020 00 27 02 a5 00 01 fe 8c 00 00 00 1e 47 50 4f 53 |.'..GPOS| 0030 ec 90 e4 de 00 01 fe fc 00 00 10 b4 47 53 55 42 |GSUB| 0040 93 3c 82 4b 00 01 fe ac 00 00 00 50 4f 53 2f 32 |..K...POS/2| 0050 f7 1a 8b 76 00 00 01 a8 00 00 00 60 63 6d 61 70 |...v...`cmap| 0060 1d c3 05 9f 00 00 0c 84 00 00 0b b6 63 76 74 20 |cvt | 0070 41 f4 43 ea 00 00 22 1c 00 00 02 14 66 70 67 6d |A.Cfpgm| 0080 73 d3 23 b0 00 00 18 3c 00 00 07 05 67 61 73 70 |s.#gasp| 0090 00 18 00 09 00 01 fe 7c 00 00 00 10 67 6c 79 66 |...|glyf| 00a0 93 48 ad 96 00 00 29 70 00 01 b8 f4 68 65 61 64 |.H)phead| 00b0 f2 fb 5b ca 00 00 01 2c 00 00 00 36 68 68 65 61 |..[,...6hhea| 00c0 0e 4b 08 a2 00 00 01 64 00 00 00 24 68 6d 74 78 |.K.d...$hmtx| 00d0 2e dd 09 42 00 00 02 08 00 00 0a 7c 6c 6f 63 61 |...B...|loca| 00e0 50 0f c1 1e 00 00 24 30 00 00 05 40 6d 61 78 70 |p.$0...@maxp| 00f0 07 04 07 d0 00 00 01 88 00 00 00 20 6e 61 6d 65 |... name| 0100 23 57 ab c2 00 01 e2 64 00 00 07 fb 70 6f 73 74 |#W.dpost| 0110 5a cf 99 96 00 01 ea 60 00 00 14 19 70 72 65 70 |Z..`prep| The table-name-tags are easily visible in the hexdump. Please note that the kern tag is missing in this example as the traditional kern table is missing in the font file. Try TTX (from http://sourceforge.net/projects/fonttools/) if you don't like the hexdump-method. Another method to check if the font is directly usable on Windows is to use the GetKerningPairs() API for this font and check the result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 503430] Incorrect Kerning in some applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 --- Comment #25 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-07-13 21:14:39 EDT --- Used the fontforge 20090408 to generate: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/liberation-fonts/1.05.1.20090713/2.fc12/noarch/liberation-sans-fonts-1.05.1.20090713-2.fc12.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477437, which changed state. Bug 477437 Summary: [paktype-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |MODIFIED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Re: exim: SELinux
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Frank Chiullifrankc.fed...@gmail.com wrote: Thomas, Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately it did not work. I'm still getting the same error. Frank Is Exim not executing it's job as it is supposed to - as in delivery of mail is hampered by this error? I am no SELinux or Exim expert, but, AFAIK the /boot directory is not supposed to be related to the regular functioning of Exim. Didar ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: exim: SELinux
Didar, Mail is arriving. I just get one SELinux message for every mail message. I agree...exim should not be referencing /boot AFAIK. But I'm not an expert. Frank On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Didar Hossaindidar.hoss...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Frank Chiullifrankc.fed...@gmail.com wrote: Thomas, Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately it did not work. I'm still getting the same error. Frank Is Exim not executing it's job as it is supposed to - as in delivery of mail is hampered by this error? I am no SELinux or Exim expert, but, AFAIK the /boot directory is not supposed to be related to the regular functioning of Exim. Didar ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: exim: SELinux
Don't mean to be completely rude but doesn't this belong on a support forum? On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 05:17 -0700, Frank Chiulli wrote: Didar, Mail is arriving. I just get one SELinux message for every mail message. I agree...exim should not be referencing /boot AFAIK. But I'm not an expert. Frank On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Didar Hossaindidar.hoss...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Frank Chiullifrankc.fed...@gmail.com wrote: Thomas, Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately it did not work. I'm still getting the same error. Frank Is Exim not executing it's job as it is supposed to - as in delivery of mail is hampered by this error? I am no SELinux or Exim expert, but, AFAIK the /boot directory is not supposed to be related to the regular functioning of Exim. Didar ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: exim: SELinux
On 13 Jul 2009, at 13:17, Frank Chiulli wrote: Mail is arriving. I just get one SELinux message for every mail message. I agree...exim should not be referencing /boot AFAIK. But I'm not an expert. Without having seen the config I can only make wild guesses... However the wild guess I would make is that exim is doing a check for available space in the spool and log directories, and this is triggering the SELinux check on the statvfs() call. It is a wild guess though :-) Can you make sure that there are no references to boot in the config files Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
marketing needs some input on a news platform
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FooBar#Platform_options What does Infrastructure think? We're currently leaning between using WordPress and piggybacking on Zikula. -- Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36 pgp9raSQc4AVk.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
about me and my experience
Hi everyone, My self Niraj Bhatt, recently I joined fedora community. I completed master in computer science then RHCE and now preparing for RHCSS. I am working as Unix Administrator in Tata Consultancy Services (TCS). Right now I am handling 900+ servers. I have sound knowledge of apache, mysql, php, clustering, Load Balancer (BIG IP), LDAP and performance tunning. I want to becomes the part of fedora development so I joined this community. I am managing www.vglug.info (Linux User Group) web site. To promote open source I am taking seminar in colleges. -- Niraj Bhatt Give me space to stand, i will move the earth ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Fw: Kernel Loading Sequence
Thank you for the info. I just have one more question. I'm still getting the following messages before plymouth loads: ACPI: I/O resource :00:1f.3 [0x400-0x41f] conflicts with ACPI region SMRG [0x400-0x40f] hub 1-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 7 I looked those issues up and I know the first is supposed to be fixed in 2.6.30 and the second is being worked on. My question is: which kernel config setting should I enable/disable so as not to show those messages on startup? Thank you again for the help. Ahmad From: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com To: drago01 drag...@gmail.com Cc: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com; Ahmad Al-Yaman ahmad221...@yahoo.com Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 6:28:22 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Kernel Loading Sequence On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 01:43:36PM +0200, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Ahmad Al-Yamanahmad221...@yahoo.com wrote: Thank you, I adjusted the config file as you recommended and the messages are gone. Where should I report this lockdep? Depends on which kernel / patches do you use. If it is a vanilla tarball then upstream (lkml / bugzilla.kernel.org) if you are using the fedora kernel bugzilla.redhat.com It's already fixed in 2.6.31rc2 Fedora 11 will pick it up when we rebase, it's not a critical patch. Rawhide is already fixed. Dave ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Webcam Help
I installed Fedora 11 on my sony vaio computer. My webcam is not recognized by any software. I know it is supported because the webcam worked on a live distro of Fedora 11 any thoughts ???by the way it is a built in webcam ___ Fedora-laptop-list mailing list Fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-laptop-list
Re: Webcam Help
Yes my camera was recognized on cheese when I was using a live disk of Fedora 11 to test things out. Cheese displays the no camera found message. ___ Fedora-laptop-list mailing list Fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-laptop-list
yum runs out of mirrors to try when updating
I did a yum update on a fresh F11 install (i386) and yum can't find some packages. Does anyone know what's going on? Error Downloading Packages: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586: failure: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates : (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586: failure: farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586.rpm from u pdates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') 12:dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586: failure: dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586: failure: alsa-plugins- pulseaudio-1 .0.20-2.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586: failure: gstreamer-plugins- good-0. 10.15-3.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586: failure: gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586.rp m from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: yum runs out of mirrors to try when updating
Amadeus W.M. wrote: I did a yum update on a fresh F11 install (i386) and yum can't find some packages. Does anyone know what's going on? Yes It means you've not really been reading the list before posting :-) Error Downloading Packages: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586: failure: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates : (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586: failure: farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586.rpm from u pdates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') 12:dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586: failure: dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586: failure: alsa-plugins- pulseaudio-1 .0.20-2.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586: failure: gstreamer-plugins- good-0. 10.15-3.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586: failure: gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586.rp m from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') -- Any programming language is at its best before it is implemented and used. mei-mei.gres...@greshko.com http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Does Iced Tea Web Start work on Fedora 10? What about Fedora 11?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Rick Sewillrsew...@gmail.com wrote: Step 2 - Complete your setup fails when I use Iced Tea Web Start on Fedora 10. I click Configuration Room to test my connection, the web page changes to a web page with, Launching Elluminate Live..., and a pop-up asks me what I should use to open meeting.jnlp. If I select Iced Tea Web Start (default), nothing happens. Same here on Fedora 11 I guess I am asking if other people can get Ice Tea Web Start to work. I'm hoping to get a clue what I am doing wrong so it will work for me. On the Sun's download page there's a footnote saying: * Please use the 32-bit version for Java applet and Java Web Start support. so my guess is elluminate (and other webstart based sites like webex) expects and works only with the 32 bit variant. Now the question is whether it is possible to install the openjdk 32 bit java plugin in a 64 bit OS... -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Triple boot windows, fedora, and rawhide
Mike Chambers wrote: What I ended up doing, was having my main work station set to dual boot as normal, with grub installed to the mbr. I then installed rawhide and just installed grub to the first boot partition. Then edited grub on my main workstation with a stanza for rawhide. Now, I can install kernels or whatever on each install, and don't have to update grub manually. true, you can chain this way. but what happens if you have a problem with sector 00 on either of these partitions? if you lose 00 on your partition, you lose lose your chain to your new install. if you lose 00 on your mbr, you lose both. there is nothing wrong with doing what you did. it works. but do cover yourself, have something in event of a 00 failure. i did not explain this in other post, and i should have. Don't know if it's the easiest or best, but it seems to work fine without having to share dir's and all that mess. easy it is. best is to be found out with time. as for having to share directories, you do not have to share them. you can set grub.conf to pull kernel and initrd from which ever place you want. advantage of chain load is that when you upgrade kernel, grub.conf will be updated to it's associated /boot directory. if you use a common /boot, same thing. what ever you decide, do make a recovery boot disk or usb memory. you can use rescue mode from install cd/dvd, but there are times when it does not work. main thing, know and understand what procedures you have as options and you will have less problems down the road. later. -- peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Fedora 11: Switching to single user mode (runlevel 1) -- Hey g.
Tim wrote: On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 22:24 -0400, David wrote: I see. You would expect me to ask, please send me your public GnuPG key, from someone I asked publicly and politely to post it or stop signing. From someone who then publicly attacked me and insulted me and said rude things to me and to the list about me. tim, excuse my delay in replying. noise got in way so i decided to wait until it quited down. for someone to send me an email offlist and complain about my sig making them feel dumb and remove it is more like telling to stop doing something because i make them feel dumb and they do not like to feel dumb. if they feel dumb because of it, then maybe they need to have a look at links and learn something so they will feel less dumb. i have had many offlist emails asking about the 'learn linux' links and which one would be best to help them learn linux. most of whom have even written back and thanked me for having the sig and leading them to where they have found more help. who do you think i will give more precedence to? 30 days later, to the day, they post publicly that my pgp is causing them problems because their email is a second or two longer because their email is trying to find my public key and can not. so because of this, they tell me to post my key or remove it. did this just start happening? was it not happening 30 days ago? why did they not make mention about the key 30 days ago? do i expect you to answer for them? !no! i do not. you are not them. to me it seemed like they were starting a 30 day period cycle of complaint and gripping. [i can not use that other word] i went thru period problems with my last wife and that is why she is now my ex-wife. I'd expect you (or anyone else) to ask someone if they can publish their key, or send it to you, and accept whatever the outcome was. I don't expect someone to demand someone else stop signing mail, or demand anything else, *THAT* is rude. And you can expect rude demands to be replied to with a similar lack of courtesy. i have had many offlist emails stating that they tried to pull my key but could not find it on any server and would i mind sending it to them. i told them that i had published my key years before and that i had a spam increase so i stopped publishing it and i sent them my key. there were a couple who tried to impress me with 'facts they knew' about how keys worked and that i had to publish it. i played with them and told them that i had to publish nothing and that if someone wanted my key, all they had to do was ask. when they asked, i sent it. most wrote back and thanked me. i did not ask them to thank me, it was just their way of being polite. some people know how to be polite, some do not. i know how to be polite, just as i can not be polite. i just find it easier to be polite. i started using pgp because before i did, i had someone send an email as me and it caused a big stink, even to a point where i was advised to seek legal advice and i did. things even got to a point where a court date was set, but before that happened, proof was found and presented to prove that i had not sent email. as i mentioned in another post, someone from this list tried to forge an email in my name, but it did get caught by list server and i received a notice that it had happened. i am not sure who sent it, does not really matter. i have an idea of who, but that does not matter. because it did not show up on list, they know that they failed. funny thing about it is that i believe that i have an idea of what it was about because when a poster made a comment about his wife, it did hit with an implication and he was wide open for a come back. i started to, but decided against it. i do wish i had emailed him offlist and let him know just how wide open his statement was. i do believe that he would have enjoyed knowing about it and had he told his wife, well i do hope she has a good sense of humor. that is in past, but is another reason of why i send to this and other list with a pgp sig. what is really interesting about those who moan and groan about a second or two delay about email clients not finding a pgp sig key is that they say nothing about the posters who continue to use 'text/html' to post to this list. like it does not take any longer to download a message that is 2 to 4 times larger because it is 'text/html' than if it was 'text/plain'? or is it that they are not as aware of fact that they are receiving 'text/html' email as they are when they have a brief pause and up pops across displayed header that pgp sig could not be verified. and then they do not see that until they read the email or note who it is from. Don't get your knickers in a twist if you get insulted after being rude to someone. some people do not understand how they come across when they have their mind set to 'they are right and anyone who disagrees is wrong'. they get their 'panties in a wad' are tend to be just down right irritated
NetworkManager pptp vpn and routes?
I have a laptop running F11 fully up to date, and have NetworkManager-pptp and pptp installed. In F10 I had the same setup running and I had set up a vpn connection (pptp) to work with the default route to my home LAN retained whilst the additional route to machines on the remote work LAN via the vpn was also active. In F11 I can set up the vpn connection using a vpn defined in NetworkManager tabs. However I cannot get the route behaviour correct. Can someone point me to the steps needed in the vpn set up tabs to get the behaviour I had previously in F10 with retaining the default route and simultaneously having a route to remote machines via the vpn? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NetworkManager-pptp-vpn-and-routes--tp24457880p24457880.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: NetworkManager pptp vpn and routes?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Mike Cloakedmike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote: I have a laptop running F11 fully up to date, and have NetworkManager-pptp and pptp installed. In F10 I had the same setup running and I had set up a vpn connection (pptp) to work with the default route to my home LAN retained whilst the additional route to machines on the remote work LAN via the vpn was also active. In F11 I can set up the vpn connection using a vpn defined in NetworkManager tabs. However I cannot get the route behaviour correct. Can someone point me to the steps needed in the vpn set up tabs to get the behaviour I had previously in F10 with retaining the default route and simultaneously having a route to remote machines via the vpn? Thanks As I report I reported here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461420#c8 I could not get custom routes to work with NM-pptp either. -- Fedora 10 (www.pembo13.com) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: NetworkManager pptp vpn and routes?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Mike Cloakedmike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote: Arthur Pemberton wrote: As I report I reported here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461420#c8 I could not get custom routes to work with NM-pptp either. Maybe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479317 is relevant too? I'll have to read that report in detail at a later time. In my case, any time I attempted to define a route, other than the default, pppd would since fail a few seconds after connecting. -- Fedora 10 (www.pembo13.com) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How do I switch mirror for rpmfusion?
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 09:14 +0400, gil...@altern.org wrote: I'm trying to install OOo at the present time with Pirut. I started downloading at about 21:45h. It's now midnight, I have 203 MB downloaded and it's not finished, Are you downloading from local mirrors, or mirrors world-wide? I've noticed that when I do yum updates, that it tends to select local ones more likely than further away ones. I'm receiving an Australianised mirror list, and it *usually* serves me fine, but not always. Perhaps, you get supplied with a less than optimal set of mirrors, and you want to hand select one or more good ones, and stick to just them. Visit their websites, and directly download a large file, or two, to get a feel for their responsiveness (starting to download promptly, and whether downloads continue at a rapid rate). -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: VMware Workstation in F11
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Matthew Saltzmanm...@clemson.edu wrote: I performed a fresh install of F11, then installed VMware-Workstation-6.5.2-156735.x86_64.rpm. Installed the patch for kernel-2.6.29 from http://communities.vmware.com/thread/203231. Now, when I try to start a VM, I get a message that the .vmdk file can't be found. The message pop-up lets me browse to the location of the file. File not found: xxx.vmdk This file is required to power on the virtual machine. If this file was moved, please provide its new location. But the file has not been moved, and when I select the file from the browser, VMware still refuses to start. Turning selinux to non-enforcing doesn't help. Problem occurs with Workstation and Player. Everything worked fine with F10, including with a 2.6.29 test kernel. Anybody seen this? Anybody know a solution? Try disabling selinux completely. On my F10 box with vmware server, permissive mode wasn't enough. Regards, Chris -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
make oldconfig of current kernel config for x64_64 f11?
for the sake of experimentation, i want to build a kernel for my x86_64 version of f11 using the current /boot/config file and the current git pull of the kernel source tree. anyone know any reason why that might be a hideously bad idea? obviously, i'll keep the working version around, but i was just wondering if anyone had tried this and run into any show-stopper issues. thanks. rday -- Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday Kernel Newbie Corner column @ linux.com: http://cli.gs/WG6WYX -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Fwd: exim: SELinux
Probably should have posted to this list first. Frank -- Forwarded message -- From: Frank Chiulli frankc.fed...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:17 AM Subject: Re: exim: SELinux To: Didar Hossain didar.hoss...@gmail.com Cc: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-l...@redhat.com Didar, Mail is arriving. I just get one SELinux message for every mail message. I agree...exim should not be referencing /boot AFAIK. But I'm not an expert. Frank On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Didar Hossaindidar.hoss...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Frank Chiullifrankc.fed...@gmail.com wrote: Thomas, Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately it did not work. I'm still getting the same error. Frank Is Exim not executing it's job as it is supposed to - as in delivery of mail is hampered by this error? I am no SELinux or Exim expert, but, AFAIK the /boot directory is not supposed to be related to the regular functioning of Exim. Didar -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: exim: SELinux
I realized that just before I received your email and did post to fedora-list. My mistake and thanks for the heads up. Frank On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:22 AM, David JM Emmettm...@davidjmemmett.co.uk wrote: Don't mean to be completely rude but doesn't this belong on a support forum? On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 05:17 -0700, Frank Chiulli wrote: Didar, Mail is arriving. I just get one SELinux message for every mail message. I agree...exim should not be referencing /boot AFAIK. But I'm not an expert. Frank On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Didar Hossaindidar.hoss...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Frank Chiullifrankc.fed...@gmail.com wrote: Thomas, Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately it did not work. I'm still getting the same error. Frank Is Exim not executing it's job as it is supposed to - as in delivery of mail is hampered by this error? I am no SELinux or Exim expert, but, AFAIK the /boot directory is not supposed to be related to the regular functioning of Exim. Didar ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list fedora-infrastructure-l...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: SELinux warning about sendmail
On 07/10/2009 06:09 PM, Andras Simon wrote: Sometimes I see the warning: SELinux is preventing the sendmail from using potentially mislabeled files (/root). sendmail is not installed, but according to sealert, this warning is really about ssmtp. Of course I'm not trying to mail any file from /root, in fact, I don't mail anything. Any idea what might be going on? Andras What is the AVC. It might be just doing a getattr of /root which could trigger an AVC. When an app starts with it's homedir set to /root, it will getattr on the $HOME, which can cause this AVC. Usually these are dontaudited. So I would need to see the AVC to understand what it is complaining about. grep avc /var/log/audit/audit.log -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: httpd vs. avahi and SELinux in Fedora 11
On 07/11/2009 07:06 PM, Steven F. LeBrun wrote: After doing a clean install of Fedora 11, the Apache webserver, httpd 2.2.11, is failing. The error log [see below] shows that all the httpd children are killing themselves with Segmentation faults. Httpd was working fine in Fedora 10, same laptop and I started with a fresh install of Apache's httpd using the RPM provided for Fedora 11. At first I thought that maybe it is an SELinux problem. Then I noticed in the error_log the following line: [error] avahi_entry_group_add_service_strlst(tardis) failed: Local name collision The FQHN of my laptop where I am trying to run httpd is tardis.home.lebruns.com Question 1: Is the segmentation faults due to an SELinux policy issue? I checked the files that should be displayed and their security context looks correct. Is there a problem displayed in the first error log line where it states: SELinux policy enabled; httpd running as context unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 Question 2: Any ideas of what is causing the avahi error message? What causes a Local name collision? None of the configuration files specify the host name that httpd is running on. [Setting ServiceName did not change anything.] Error Log: [Sat Jul 11 18:50:26 2009] [notice] SELinux policy enabled; httpd running as context unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 [Sat Jul 11 18:50:26 2009] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) [Sat Jul 11 18:50:26 2009] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... [Sat Jul 11 18:50:26 2009] [notice] Digest: done [Sat Jul 11 18:50:26 2009] [notice] mod_python: Creating 4 session mutexes based on 256 max processes and 0 max threads. [Sat Jul 11 18:50:26 2009] [notice] mod_python: using mutex_directory /tmp [Sat Jul 11 18:50:27 2009] [error] avahi_entry_group_add_service_strlst(tardis) failed: Local name collision [Sat Jul 11 18:50:27 2009] [notice] Apache/2.2.11 (Unix) DAV/2 mod_mono/2.4 mod_nss/2.2.11 NSS/3.12.2.0 PHP/5.2.9 mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.6 mod_ssl/2.2.11 OpenSSL/0.9.8k-fips mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0 configured -- resuming normal operations [Sat Jul 11 18:50:27 2009] [notice] child pid 10956 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) [Sat Jul 11 18:50:27 2009] [notice] child pid 10957 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) ... The exit signal Segmentation fault (11) repeats ad nausium until httpd is stopped. Any help and/or suggestions will be appreciated. Does this happen if SELinux is in permissive mode? Is selinux reporting errors in the /var/log/audit/audit.log? # getsebool -a | grep avahi httpd_dbus_avahi -- on THe only avahi/dbus boolean is defined above. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F11 mrtg external scripts permission errors (selinux?)
On 07/12/2009 07:04 AM, Jurgen Kramer wrote: I've just upgraded my server to Fedora 11 (clean install) and I am trying to get everything working again. I have some problems with my mrtg scripts, they seem not allowed to run. I guess this has something to do with selinux. I see the following errors in the log: Can't exec /etc/mrtg/cpu_temp.sh: Permission denied at /usr/bin/mrtg line 2030. 2009-07-12 12:35:02: WARNING: Running '/etc/mrtg/cpu_temp.sh': Permission denied 2009-07-12 12:35:02: WARNING: Could not get any data from external command '/etc/mrtg/cpu_temp.sh' Maybe the external command did not even start. (Permission denied) I changed the security context for all files residing in /etc/mrtg to: [kra...@nasng mrtg]$ ll -Z -rwx--. root root system_u:object_r:mrtg_etc_t:s0 cpufan_speed.sh -rwx--. root root system_u:object_r:mrtg_etc_t:s0 cpu_temp.sh -rwx--. root root system_u:object_r:mrtg_etc_t:s0 fan_speed.sh -rwx--. root root system_u:object_r:mrtg_etc_t:s0 hdd_temp.sh -rwx--. root root system_u:object_r:mrtg_etc_t:s0 mb_temp.sh -rw-r--r--. root root system_u:object_r:mrtg_etc_t:s0 mrtg.cfg -rwx--. root root system_u:object_r:mrtg_etc_t:s0 nbfan_speed.sh but I still get the permission denied errors. What should the correct security context for the scripts be? Or do they need to be moved to another location? BTW running the command as executed by the crontab by hand works without problems. Jurgen mrtg_t can read etc_t but not execute it, these should probably be labeled bin_t. Please attach the AVC messages that mrtg is complaining about, so I can try to write a better setroubleshoot plugin for this. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: question on using febootstrap
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:00:59AM -0700, Globe Trotter wrote: Failed: filesystem.x86_64 0:2.4.21-1.fc11 Complete! This is OK. It's caused because rpm tries to create /proc, and fakechroot doesn't catch the write and redirect it into the chroot. However failure to create this directory doesn't actually matter. Not sure what the filesystem failure is supposed to mean. Also, where should I put the kickstart file, or its equivalent? If equivalent, then what is it? febootstrap doesn't support kickstart files. If you want to add that, patches are welcomed, and would be an excellent feature. Then, regardless, I tried: $ febootstrap-to-initramfs ./f11 initrd.img 745468 blocks I am little lost as to what I should do after this point to get to a LiveCD. Could you please make suggestions? Not sure what else you're trying to do. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Rant: Clamav is not well-integrated
I've just spent a frustrating two hours trying to get clamav installed and running. Ultimately I turned if off again to get mail flowing. First, there are too many different packages required to get the system working: clamav-milter, clamav-scanner, freshclam, etc There should be an easy to install package that gets everything. Second: The integration into the user system is messy, two usernames and multiple groups and conflicting permissions are in use. Third: It takes manual intervention to get sendmail.mc correctly formed and clamav integrated. I understand that this is necessarily a manual process, but there is essentially no documentation of what should be done in a recipe. Fourth: Clamav-milter is different from clamd and there is no initscript support for clamd (the scanner daemon) which should be controlled by the clamav-milter initscript. Fifth: Freshclam (the updater) should be better integrated. It takes a separate install and configuration (manual) step, and then it complains that the version is already out-of-date! Sixth: I really appreciate the work that the package maintainer has done, but the integration and logic are much less than clear and clean. Thanks for listening. G.Wolfe Woodbury -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: question on using febootstrap
--- On Mon, 7/13/09, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: From: Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com Subject: Re: question on using febootstrap To: Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com, fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Monday, July 13, 2009, 9:07 AM On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:00:59AM -0700, Globe Trotter wrote: Failed: filesystem.x86_64 0:2.4.21-1.fc11 Complete! This is OK. It's caused because rpm tries to create /proc, and fakechroot doesn't catch the write and redirect it into the chroot. However failure to create this directory doesn't actually matter. Not sure what the filesystem failure is supposed to mean. Also, where should I put the kickstart file, or its equivalent? If equivalent, then what is it? febootstrap doesn't support kickstart files. If you want to add that, patches are welcomed, and would be an excellent feature. Then, regardless, I tried: $ febootstrap-to-initramfs ./f11 initrd.img 745468 blocks I am little lost as to what I should do after this point to get to a LiveCD. Could you please make suggestions? Not sure what else you're trying to do. Hi, Many thanks! My question is how do I get to a LiveCD from here? Best, T -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
F10, AthlonXP 2500+, recently updated...System freeze?
This may be coincidence, or maybe not... After the last round of updates to F10 on my AthlonXP 2500+ system, a couple/few weeks ago, my system has been freezing. I get nothing in my logs, I see nothing in the way of the normal kernel debug output that often spews out to the screen...the system just completely freezes. I've tried in runlevel 5 (where I normally run, as I use this system as my desktop) and in runlevel 3. I seem to recall a thread, recently, where some laptop users were noting that they were noting increased heat and their fans running more often, after some recent updates (and specifically noted that they were not having this issue when dual booting into Windows)...has anyone else noted similar issues on desktop type systems? While I realize that there are risks to using bleeding edge operating systems, I've been a Red Hat user since 4.2, and a Fedora user since FC1, and not having my desktop system usable is causing me great distress, at this point. Thanks. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org To be notified of updates to the web site, visit: https://www.bubbanfriends.org/mailman/listinfo/site-update or send a blank email message to: site-update-subscr...@bubbanfriends.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: yum runs out of mirrors to try when updating
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 06:42 +, Amadeus W.M. wrote: I did a yum update on a fresh F11 install (i386) and yum can't find some packages. Does anyone know what's going on? Not yet but I filed bug 510959 about the problem, which persists. Error Downloading Packages: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586: failure: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates : (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586: failure: farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586.rpm from u pdates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') 12:dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586: failure: dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586: failure: alsa-plugins- pulseaudio-1 .0.20-2.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586: failure: gstreamer-plugins- good-0. 10.15-3.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586: failure: gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586.rp m from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') -- === Oh what wouldn't I give to be spat at in the face... -- a prisoner in Life of Brian === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Software update failed.
On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 16:34 -0700, Geoffrey Leach wrote: On 07/12/2009 04:12:22 PM, Mike Adolf wrote: I just got a panel icon alert that there were several updates for Fedora 11. But after running the updates not all were able to download. Here are a few of the not-too-informative errors. Can this be corrected. - grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586: failure: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586: failure: farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') 12:dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586: failure: dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586: failure: alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.') Try 'yum update' as root As has been pointed out by several people , that does not work either. -- === In a great romance, each person basically plays a part that the other really likes. -- Elizabeth Ashley === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: yum runs out of mirrors to try when updating
Aaron Konstam wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 06:42 +, Amadeus W.M. wrote: I did a yum update on a fresh F11 install (i386) and yum can't find some packages. Does anyone know what's going on? Not yet but I filed bug 510959 about the problem, which persists. I don't now the cause, but the problem is obvious: The i386-updates repos are broken and none of the people in charge has been able to fix this. Ralf -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
trying to boot f11 with git-version kernel has radeon problems
as a followup to my earlier post, i grabbed the current /boot/config for my f11 x86_64 system, the current git kernel tree, did make oldconfig, took all the default answers, built a new kernel, rebooted to get in, /var/log/messages: ... Jul 13 09:22:25 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:25 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:25 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:25 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:25 localhost kernel: [drm:radeon_cp_getparam_kms] *ERROR* invalid ioctl with kms radeon_cp_getparam_kms Jul 13 09:22:25 localhost gdm-binary[2416]: WARNING: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.478773 seconds Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost kernel: [drm:radeon_cp_getparam_kms] *ERROR* invalid ioctl with kms radeon_cp_getparam_kms Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost gdm-binary[2416]: WARNING: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.510389 seconds Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost kernel: [drm:radeon_cp_getparam_kms] *ERROR* invalid ioctl with kms radeon_cp_getparam_kms Jul 13 09:22:26 localhost gdm-binary[2416]: WARNING: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.463502 seconds Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost kernel: [drm:radeon_cp_getparam_kms] *ERROR* invalid ioctl with kms radeon_cp_getparam_kms Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost gdm-binary[2416]: WARNING: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.499731 seconds Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost kernel: [drm:radeon_cp_getparam_kms] *ERROR* invalid ioctl with kms radeon_cp_getparam_kms Jul 13 09:22:27 localhost gdm-binary[2416]: WARNING: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.455812 seconds Jul 13 09:22:28 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:28 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:28 localhost kernel: i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block. Jul 13 09:22:28 localhost kernel: radeon :01:05.0: LVDS-1: no EDID data Jul 13 09:22:28 localhost kernel: [drm:radeon_cp_getparam_kms] *ERROR* invalid ioctl with kms radeon_cp_getparam_kms Jul 13 09:22:28 localhost gdm-binary[2416]: WARNING: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.504048 seconds Jul 13 09:22:28 localhost gdm-binary[2416]: WARNING: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: maximum number of X display failures reached: check X server log for errors Jul 13 09:22:28 localhost init: prefdm main process (2416) terminated with status 1 Jul 13 09:22:28 localhost init: prefdm main process ended, respawning Jul 13 09:22:28 localhost init: prefdm respawning too fast, stopped thoughts? i *am* up and running at the command line so that's a good sign, but given the grief i've had with radeon drivers lately, this development doesn't really surprise me. given that this isn't an officially supported kernel, is there any value in BZ'ing this? i can supply /var/log/Xorg.0.log and everything else that's usually relevant. rday -- Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday Kernel Newbie Corner column @ linux.com: http://cli.gs/WG6WYX -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
F11: Blender and the i915 driver
Hi all, It seems that the i915 driver of the kernel shipped with F11 (2.6.29.5-191.fc11.x86_64) has some problems. When I start blender (v, 2.49a) my X will completely freeze! Looking in /var/log/messages: Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [ cut here ] Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2136! Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: invalid opcode: [#1] SMP Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: last sysfs file: /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0C0A:00/power_supply/BAT0/charge_full Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: CPU 1 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: Modules linked in: fuse ipv6 cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table dm_multipath kvm_intel kvm uinput arc4 ecb snd_hda_codec_idt iwl3945 firewire_ohci snd_hda_intel firewire_core snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep mac80211 snd_pcm yenta_socket tg3 rsrc_nonstatic i2c_i801 snd_timer snd iTCO_wdt soundcore iTCO_vendor_support snd_page_alloc wmi pcspkr crc_itu_t lib80211 cfg80211 dell_laptop joydev dcdbas i915 drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core video output [last unloaded: microcode] Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: Pid: 2162, comm: blender Not tainted 2.6.29.5-191.fc11.x86_64 #1 Latitude D830 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: RIP: 0010:[a005f3d2] [a005f3d2] i915_gem_object_get_fence_reg+0x221/0x61e [i915] Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: RSP: :88006c915be8 EFLAGS: 00010202 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: RAX: 1524 RBX: 88006f88d480 RCX: 0010 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: RDX: 2a02 RSI: 1524 RDI: 88006f88d240 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: RBP: 88006c915c28 R08: 0004 R09: 88007d5ae1f0 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: R10: 0200 R11: 0040 R12: 88006f88d3c0 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: R13: 88007d5ae000 R14: 88006f88d600 R15: 88007d5ac000 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: FS: 7fb7540f1780() GS:88007f001f00() knlGS: Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: CR2: 7fb7540fc000 CR3: 6c813000 CR4: 26e0 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: DR0: DR1: DR2: Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: Process blender (pid: 2162, threadinfo 88006c914000, task 88006a92) Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: Stack: Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: 88006c915c38 88007d5ae1f0 88007d5ac020 88006f88d600 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: 88007d5ac020 88006f88d480 88006f9c2580 88006c915ce8 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: 88006c915c98 a00610d3 88006c915c68 7fb7540fc000 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: Call Trace: Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [a00610d3] i915_gem_fault+0xc1/0x136 [i915] Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [810b213f] __do_fault+0x55/0x3d5 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [812429bb] ? agp_flush_chipset+0x1b/0x1d Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [a005d523] ? i915_gem_object_flush_cpu_write_domain+0x26/0x32 [i915] Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [810b4475] handle_mm_fault+0x349/0x7c5 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [813ae615] do_page_fault+0x5b5/0x9e9 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [813ac01a] ? unlock_kernel+0x2f/0x32 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [810e0e27] ? vfs_ioctl+0x76/0x87 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [810e12bb] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x462/0x4a3 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [813abab5] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x6c Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: [813ac175] page_fault+0x25/0x30 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: Code: ff e8 35 e9 ff ff 85 c0 0f 84 b3 fe ff ff e9 06 04 00 00 41 83 7c 24 20 00 75 10 48 8b 55 c8 48 8b 02 f7 40 70 be ff ff ff 74 04 0f 0b eb fe 49 8b bf 38 01 00 00 48 8b 70 38 48 85 ff 74 1a 48 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: RIP [a005f3d2] i915_gem_object_get_fence_reg+0x221/0x61e [i915] Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: RSP 88006c915be8 Jul 13 15:15:35 feedback kernel: ---[ end trace 77c31c0b3328e17f ]--- I looked at the kenerloops.org site and I've found many bugs related to i915 but I'm not sure that mine is included Should I submit a bug? ... and where? Thanks in advance! Cheers -- Marco -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: question on using febootstrap
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:11:22AM -0700, Globe Trotter wrote: Many thanks! My question is how do I get to a LiveCD from here? I have no idea. Better go back to whoever told you to use febootstrap in the first place. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
F11x64 and Java Web Start = Nada...?
I have a friend we just installed F11 (64-bit) for. They need to use an application which requires Java Web Start (IcedTea Web Start?) Problem: This simply isn't working. the .jnlp file asks to load IcedTea Web Start and then does absolutely nothing...! I need to get this working ASAP. Ideas on what could be wrong and what any potential work-arounds might be? -- = You see things as they are and ask, 'Why?' I dream things as they never were and ask, 'Why not?' -- George Bernard Shaw -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
threading broken in thunderbird-3.0b2 ?
Anyone else notice that email threading isn't working right in thunderbird-3.0b2 ? It worked all the time with the 2.x version from Fedora10, and now no matter how many times I click the Click to display message threads header button, its all just flat. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F11x64 and Java Web Start = Nada...?
* Christopher A. Williams chriswfed...@cawllc.com [2009-07-13 10:02]: I have a friend we just installed F11 (64-bit) for. They need to use an application which requires Java Web Start (IcedTea Web Start?) Problem: This simply isn't working. the .jnlp file asks to load IcedTea Web Start and then does absolutely nothing...! I need to get this working ASAP. Ideas on what could be wrong and what any potential work-arounds might be? Where can I find the .jnlp that he is trying to run? Deepak -- = You see things as they are and ask, 'Why?' I dream things as they never were and ask, 'Why not?' -- George Bernard Shaw -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Rant: Clamav is not well-integrated
G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: I've just spent a frustrating two hours trying to get clamav installed and running. Ultimately I turned if off again to get mail flowing. First, there are too many different packages required to get the system working: clamav-milter, clamav-scanner, freshclam, etc There should be an easy to install package that gets everything. Second: The integration into the user system is messy, two usernames and multiple groups and conflicting permissions are in use. Third: It takes manual intervention to get sendmail.mc correctly formed and clamav integrated. I understand that this is necessarily a manual process, but there is essentially no documentation of what should be done in a recipe. Fourth: Clamav-milter is different from clamd and there is no initscript support for clamd (the scanner daemon) which should be controlled by the clamav-milter initscript. Fifth: Freshclam (the updater) should be better integrated. It takes a separate install and configuration (manual) step, and then it complains that the version is already out-of-date! Sixth: I really appreciate the work that the package maintainer has done, but the integration and logic are much less than clear and clean. Thanks for listening. G.Wolfe Woodbury I sure pretty much anyone who uses clamav uses the one from RPMforge. Its a lot tidier and actually works out the box, and has a service set up for clamd The fedora one is well known for its awfulness Dunc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
simple LDAP for address book?
Every once and I while I take a look at trying to setup an LDAP server on my system for keeping address book info (so I can access it remotely as I already do with my dovecot IMAP server). Every time I start looking at it, I find way too much information about enterprise class directory servers and sql back ends and user authentication, etc. Anyone know of a simple howto somewhere on the net for setting up LDAP just to use for a personal address book? (Preferably some server offered in fedora repos). I have this feeling I could write my own custom LDAP server in less time than I could understand the documentation for the existing ones :-). -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: exim: SELinux
On 07/13/2009 08:24 AM, Frank Chiulli wrote: I realized that just before I received your email and did post to fedora-list. My mistake and thanks for the heads up. Frank On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:22 AM, David JM Emmettm...@davidjmemmett.co.uk wrote: Don't mean to be completely rude but doesn't this belong on a support forum? On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 05:17 -0700, Frank Chiulli wrote: Didar, Mail is arriving. I just get one SELinux message for every mail message. I agree...exim should not be referencing /boot AFAIK. But I'm not an expert. Frank On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Didar Hossaindidar.hoss...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Frank Chiullifrankc.fed...@gmail.com wrote: Thomas, Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately it did not work. I'm still getting the same error. Frank Is Exim not executing it's job as it is supposed to - as in delivery of mail is hampered by this error? I am no SELinux or Exim expert, but, AFAIK the /boot directory is not supposed to be related to the regular functioning of Exim. Didar ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list fedora-infrastructure-l...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list I am missing the first email in this chain. What AVC are you seeing from exim when mail arrives? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
disabling IRQ # 16
When I got up this morning I discovered a message that I've never seen before on all of the open gnome terminals on my desktop: message from syslogd: disabling IRQ #16 I checked /var/log/messages for further information and all that I found was this: Jul 13 04:53:01 mutt kernel: irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) Everything seemed to still be working, but I just rebooted this computer as a kind of a precaution. What just happened? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: threading broken in thunderbird-3.0b2 ?
On 07/13/2009 09:06 AM, Lonni J Friedman wrote: Anyone else notice that email threading isn't working right in thunderbird-3.0b2 ? It worked all the time with the 2.x version from Fedora10, and now no matter how many times I click the Click to display message threads header button, its all just flat. It seems to work satisfactory for me. The only problem I've had with it is that even though it gets it right most of the time, every now and then it doesn't put a response under the message it should have. That's pretty rare, though. Bradley -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: simple LDAP for address book?
On 07/13/2009 09:39 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: Every once and I while I take a look at trying to setup an LDAP server on my system for keeping address book info (so I can access it remotely as I already do with my dovecot IMAP server). Every time I start looking at it, I find way too much information about enterprise class directory servers and sql back ends and user authentication, etc. Anyone know of a simple howto somewhere on the net for setting up LDAP just to use for a personal address book? (Preferably some server offered in fedora repos). I have this feeling I could write my own custom LDAP server in less time than I could understand the documentation for the existing ones :-). Let me know when you figure this out. I've wanted to do something similar but also got bogged down by T.M.I. for something simple I wanted to do. Bradley -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
