ilbsndfile update!
Hi folks, After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long standing libsndfile bugs. One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with libsndfile into a utils subpackage. I did this only for F-13. Since libsndfile is used by so many other software, it is impractical for me to check all of these software to see if any of them depends on these command line utilities. If you have a package that depends on libsndfile, it would be good to check whether it uses these utilities. Then you'll need to require libsndfile-utils directly. If your package just needs the library there is nothing to worry about. Again, the utils split is only made in F-13. Other than that, libsndfile is updated to 1.0.20 in F-10+. Also, now it has the libvorbis support enabled. Cheers, oget [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515172 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 has gone gold
On 11/14/2009 07:22 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 05:29:30PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: We have just completed our Go / No Go meeting for Fedora 12 and have reached the decision to Go. Fedora 12's package set is golden and we're ready to stage things for shipping. Great work all around, I'm very proud of this release. I'm sure there will be more back patting and hand shaking to come, but Will Woods would like to remind everybody that it's just 11 weeks until Fedora 13 Alpha freeze! Hmm.. so I guess this means Fedora 12 will ship with 2.6.31.5 kernel? 2.6.31.6 would have had some important Xen PV guest bugfixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533730 I am sure, we will get kernel updates post-release due to security reasons anyway. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 staged for mirrors, rawhide moving on soon
Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 11/14/2009 05:22 AM, Neal Becker wrote: Jesse Keating wrote: On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:09 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: For heaven's sake, no! Don't you realize this means a ton of *users* will start to bog down the mirrors before the whole data set has propagated through the network? I'm not sure what you're expecting, but users will only be able to get to the Everything tree, which is nearly 100% hardlinks into the development/ tree. There are no isos, no install images, nothing but rpms and repodata. They will not be able to get to the isos which are behind locked dirs. So, can I do preupgrade now (I have plenty of /boot)? Yes. As always, having a backup of your data is a good thing. Rahul Preupgrade is not showing f12, only choice is rawhide. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 has gone gold
On 11/14/2009 07:29 PM, Jean-Luc Fontaine wrote: On 11/14/2009 02:52 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 05:29:30PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: We have just completed our Go / No Go meeting for Fedora 12 and have reached the decision to Go. Fedora 12's package set is golden and we're ready to stage things for shipping. Great work all around, I'm very proud of this release. Does that mean that preupgrade with 200 M /boot works? This was a problem noticed post-release and workarounded by a PackageKit push that disables upgrade release notifications on the desktop. It is possible to run preupgrade manually if you clean up older kernels and find enough room. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 staged for mirrors, rawhide moving on soon
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/14/2009 07:40 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Preupgrade is not showing f12, only choice is rawhide.
Yes but Rawhide is still Fedora 12 now. So you have a small window to
upgrade.
Rahul
Looks like it didn't work, only ran for a moment. Offers to reboot, but
didn't seem to download any packages:
sudo preupgrade
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/__init__.py:203: UserWarning: Use
.preconf instead of passing args to _getConfig
warnings.warn('Use .preconf instead of passing args to _getConfig')
Loaded plugins: blacklist, dellsysidplugin2, refresh-packagekit, whiteout
preupgrade (mirrorlist)
url:
http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=rawhidearch=$basearch
now: http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=rawhidearch=x86_64
preupgrade-rpmfusion-free-rawhide (mirrorlist)
url: http://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/mirrorlist?repo=free-fedora-
rawhidearch=x86_64
now: http://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/mirrorlist?repo=free-fedora-
rawhidearch=x86_64
preupgrade-rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide (mirrorlist)
url: http://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/mirrorlist?repo=nonfree-fedora-
rawhidearch=x86_64
now: http://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/mirrorlist?repo=nonfree-fedora-
rawhidearch=x86_64
Fetched treeinfo from ftp://fedora.bu.edu/development/x86_64/os//.treeinfo
treeinfo timestamp: Tue Apr 7 06:29:33 2009
rpmfusion-nonfree-release-11.90-1.noarch from preupgrade-rpmfusion-nonfree-
rawhide has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: system-release = 11.90 is needed by package
rpmfusion-nonfree-release-11.90-1.noarch (preupgrade-rpmfusion-nonfree-
rawhide)
rpmfusion-free-release-11.90-1.noarch from preupgrade-rpmfusion-free-rawhide
has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: system-release = 11.90 is needed by package
rpmfusion-free-release-11.90-1.noarch (preupgrade-rpmfusion-free-rawhide)
Downloading 1.8MB
Available disk space for /var/cache/yum/preupgrade: 1.1TB
Upgrade requires 500.0MB
Available disk space for /usr: 1.1TB
Generating metadata for preupgrade repo
DEBUG /sbin/grubby --title=Upgrade to Rawhide --remove-
kernel=/boot/upgrade/vmlinuz --add-kernel=/boot/upgrade/vmlinuz --
initrd=/boot/upgrade/initrd.img --args=preupgrade
repo=hd::/var/cache/yum/preupgrade stage2=hd:UUID=9a7b4349-d278-4287-
b6a9-4c4949e97730:/upgrade/install.img ks=hd:UUID=9a7b4349-d278-4287-
b6a9-4c4949e97730:/upgrade/ks.cfg
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 staged for mirrors, rawhide moving on soon
On 11/14/2009 08:17 PM, Neal Becker wrote: rpmfusion-free-release-11.90-1.noarch from preupgrade-rpmfusion-free-rawhide has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: system-release = 11.90 is needed by package rpmfusion-free-release-11.90-1.noarch (preupgrade-rpmfusion-free-rawhide) Remove the rpmfusion-*-release packages and try again. I would prefer if you post a new thread on fedora-test list if you want to continue this discussion. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
glXUseXFont (was: Re: Identifying remaining core font users)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 05:42:42PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: • ocaml-lablgl-0:1.04-2.fc12 — /usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dlltogl.so This one uses a single reference to glXUseXFont to turn an X core font into a GL display list. There is one oblique reference to doing this manually using Fontconfig and Freetype. It doesn't look very easy: http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2004-January/000945.html Any ideas on this? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Broken dependencies script at it again
Please make it stop. milter-regex-1.7-6.fc12.ppc requires /bin/sh I guess this is happening because of dropping ppc/ppc64 as primary arches? ISTR the last time the dep checker went off on a mailbombing session it was suggested that it checks for broken deps against obvious things like /bin/sh and declared itself insane, sparing us all the pointless mails? Paul. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org writes: Please make it stop. +1 ISTR the last time the dep checker went off on a mailbombing session it was suggested that it checks for broken deps against obvious things like /bin/sh and declared itself insane, sparing us all the pointless mails? /bin/sh and libc.so both ought to be trigger points for an I'm-not-sane kill switch. Or maybe reverse the logic: if you fail to find *any* of a package's dependencies, you're probably broken and should shut up. regards, tom lane -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
Le samedi 14 novembre 2009 à 16:12 +, Paul Howarth a écrit : Please make it stop. milter-regex-1.7-6.fc12.ppc requires /bin/sh I guess this is happening because of dropping ppc/ppc64 as primary arches? I think pretty much everyone will be mailbombed this way. Seems /bin/sh was dropped from provides, but the packages have not been rebuilt not to require it -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
On 11/14/2009 05:12 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: Please make it stop. +1 ... ... so far, I've received ca. 1200 of these mails and the figure is still growing by the minute. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Review Request...
Hello, I just submitted my first package for review. I'm not sure how to mark it as need sponsor. I've created my FAS account and signed the cla. I've started a scratch build to see how it works on the other arches. I've compiled locally on f12 for x86_64. Do I need to do anything else to mark it as need sponsor? Otherwise I assume I just wait for feedback via the bugzilla entry correct? Thanks, -- Nathanael Noblet -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
+1 Henrique LonelySpooky Junior http://www.lonelyspooky.com - In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?! 2009/11/14 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de On 11/14/2009 05:12 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: Please make it stop. +1 ... ... so far, I've received ca. 1200 of these mails and the figure is still growing by the minute. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review Request...
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:44:39AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Hello, I just submitted my first package for review. I'm not sure how to mark it as need sponsor. I've created my FAS account and signed the cla. I've started a scratch build to see how it works on the other arches. I've compiled locally on f12 for x86_64. Do I need to do anything else to mark it as need sponsor? Otherwise You should add you review request as blocker for FE_NEEDSPONSOR bug. It is described in yellow table at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request I assume I just wait for feedback via the bugzilla entry correct? Basically yes. -- Tomasz Torcz ,,If you try to upissue this patchset I shall be seeking xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl an IP-routable hand grenade.'' -- Andrew Morton (LKML) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review Request...
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 11:44 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Hello, I just submitted my first package for review. I'm not sure how to mark it as need sponsor. I've created my FAS account and signed the cla. I've started a scratch build to see how it works on the other arches. I've compiled locally on f12 for x86_64. Do I need to do anything else to mark it as need sponsor? Otherwise I assume I just wait for feedback via the bugzilla entry correct? Just mention in your review request that you need sponsoring. Here is detailed document how to join to package maintainers: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request Thanks, -- Nathanael Noblet Krzesimir. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Henrique Junior wrote: +1 Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it breaks? -Mike Henrique LonelySpooky Junior http://www.lonelyspooky.com - In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?! 2009/11/14 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de On 11/14/2009 05:12 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: Please make it stop. +1 ... ... so far, I've received ca. 1200 of these mails and the figure is still growing by the minute. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
On 11/14/2009 10:12 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Henrique Junior wrote: +1 Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it breaks? No, it's raising hands to a) draw attention of those persons who flipped this switch this time. b) draw attention of those persons who have the means to take countermeasures against the damage this flipping the switch had. c) to draw attention of those persons, who are in charge to supervise those persons who flipped this switch this time. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com writes: Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it breaks? I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package maintainer list. We can predict the future to the extent of being sure this will happen again. The thing is useful when it's working, but it will stop being useful if people get conditioned to ignore it. regards, tom lane -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
Tom Lane writes: Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com writes: Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it breaks? I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies. pgpijnctyywJF.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: Tom Lane writes: Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com writes: Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it breaks? I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies. I would produce a report before sending any mails. A report suming up the occurrence of each missing dependency. Eyeballing the top slots of this list should highlight some obvious things to fix first like the /bin/sh one. You want to avoid reporting global or near global items on a per package basis. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Steve Traylen -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: Tom Lane writes: Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com writes: Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it breaks? I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies. Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new future. -- Jes-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote: On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: Tom Lane writes: Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com writes: Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it breaks? I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies. Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new future. $ repoclosure -r updates | grep '^ ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -gr | head 167 rtld(GNU_HASH) 130 /sbin/ldconfig 127 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 127 libc.so.6()(64bit) 101 /bin/sh on the repo... But this is not the new rawhide (it's updates on its own) repo of course. I'm not sure where that actually is at the moment? Will look at how the rawhide report is created. The results belong in there. -- Jes -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Steve Traylen -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Jesse Keating wrote: On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: Tom Lane writes: Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com writes: Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it breaks? I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies. Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new future. Anyone on the list irritated enough to work on these scripts or just irritated enough to complain via email and let it be someone else's problem? -Mike-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
F-12 regression: new HAL completely breaks Palm-synching
Hi there, Unfortunately the new HAL on F-12 removed the handling for ACLs (apparently this is now done by udev = 145), but this now has the side-effect of removing the fdi files that were being used for Palm devices, resulting in breaking of all Palm functionality in Fedora, as detailed here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529259 My question is, as a neophyte wrt udev/hal internal logic, where should this logic correctly reside? The appropriate functionality appears to have moved to the udev package as implied by the changelog entry in hal: * Wed Jul 22 2009 David Zeuthen davidz - 0.5.12-26.20090226git.4 - Disable ConsoleKit+PolicyKit support and lock down most interfaces with at_console - Disable ACL management, this is now handled by udev = 145 but it doesn't appear to be there at least with respect to Palm devices. At one point we actually had the logic in the pilot-link package, but we removed it when it was upstreamed in hal, now it's moved again. :( I have only just upgraded to F-12, and apparently the main pilot-link owner (I'm just a co-maintainer) has not had a chance to test this on F-12 otherwise it would have been caught earlier in the release cycle. This is a fairly major regression for the user experience of any Palm user (yes there are still many of us!) on F-12, so I would like to get it fixed ASAP (at the very least for a 0-day or 1-day update if possible). If necessary I'm happy re-enable it in pilot-link only (if that's possible) until upstream is ready to push an update, but I'd like to know fairly soon so that I don't conflict on a possible udev/hal update that does the same thing. Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies script at it again
On 2009/11/14 7:13 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: Anyone on the list irritated enough to work on these scripts or just irritated enough to complain via email and let it be someone else's problem? -Mike Where can we find a copy those scripts? I would be happy to take a look and see if we can implement a simple do not send any mail if blacklist for the broken deps. Stewart -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F-12 regression: new HAL completely breaks Palm-synching
Alex Lancaster wrote: My question is, as a neophyte wrt udev/hal internal logic, where should this logic correctly reside? udev rules. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529259#c15 for details. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Bug 536724] problem with character 0BB7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536724 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-11-14 03:55:10 EDT --- hmm, you can get ttf file from rpm as well but anyway i have uploaded for you http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/Lohit-Tamil.ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: oflb-prociono-fonts
oflb-prociono-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: ns-bola-fonts
ns-bola-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: linux-libertine-fonts
linux-libertine-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: linux-libertine-fonts-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh linux-libertine-fonts-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: linux-libertine-fonts-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh linux-libertine-fonts-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: serafettin-cartoon-fonts
serafettin-cartoon-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.1-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.1-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.1-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.1-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: google-droid-fonts
google-droid-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: google-droid-sans-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh google-droid-sans-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: google-droid-sans-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh google-droid-sans-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: google-droid-sans-mono-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh google-droid-sans-mono-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: google-droid-sans-mono-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh google-droid-sans-mono-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: google-droid-serif-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh google-droid-serif-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: google-droid-serif-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh google-droid-serif-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: lcdf-typetools
lcdf-typetools has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6 lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires rtld(GNU_HASH) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libkpathsea.so.4 lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc requires libm.so.6 On ppc64: lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libm.so.6()(64bit) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6()(64bit) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc64 requires rtld(GNU_HASH) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) lcdf-typetools-2.79-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: lohit-tamil-fonts
lohit-tamil-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: lohit-tamil-fonts-2.4.4-3.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-tamil-fonts-2.4.4-3.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: lohit-tamil-fonts-2.4.4-3.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-tamil-fonts-2.4.4-3.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: ipa-pgothic-fonts
ipa-pgothic-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gdouros-aegean-fonts
gdouros-aegean-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: cjkuni-fonts
cjkuni-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript-0.2.20080216.1-31.fc13.noarch requires ghostscript = 0:8.63-4 On ppc64: cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript-0.2.20080216.1-31.fc13.noarch requires ghostscript = 0:8.63-4 Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: alfont
alfont has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: alfont-devel-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires allegro-devel On ppc64: alfont-devel-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires allegro-devel On ppc: alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6()(64bit) alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires /sbin/ldconfig alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires liballeg.so.4.2()(64bit) alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires rtld(GNU_HASH) alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires /sbin/ldconfig alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) On ppc64: alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6()(64bit) alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires /sbin/ldconfig alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires liballeg.so.4.2()(64bit) alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires rtld(GNU_HASH) alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires /sbin/ldconfig alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) alfont-2.0.6-6.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts
drehatlas-xaporho-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts-1.0.3.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh drehatlas-xaporho-fonts-1.0.3.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts-1.0.3.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh drehatlas-xaporho-fonts-1.0.3.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: fonts-ISO8859-2
fonts-ISO8859-2 has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires mkfontdir On ppc64: fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires mkfontdir On ppc: fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires mkfontdir On ppc64: fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires mkfontdir On ppc: fonts-ISO8859-2-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh fonts-ISO8859-2-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires mkfontdir On ppc64: fonts-ISO8859-2-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh fonts-ISO8859-2-1.0-22.fc12.noarch requires mkfontdir Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: apanov-heuristica-fonts
apanov-heuristica-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: 1:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-4.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh 1:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-4.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: 1:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-4.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh 1:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-4.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: vollkorn-fonts
vollkorn-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: vollkorn-fonts-1.008-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh vollkorn-fonts-1.008-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: vollkorn-fonts-1.008-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh vollkorn-fonts-1.008-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: lohit-gujarati-fonts
lohit-gujarati-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.4-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.4-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.4-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.4-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: ns-tiza-chalk-fonts
ns-tiza-chalk-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: bpg-fonts
bpg-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: bpg-nino-medium-fonts-4.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-nino-medium-fonts-4.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-nino-medium-fonts-4.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-nino-medium-fonts-4.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-sans-regular-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-sans-regular-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-sans-regular-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-sans-regular-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-courier-fonts-4.002-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-courier-fonts-4.002-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-courier-fonts-4.002-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-courier-fonts-4.002-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-serif-modern-fonts-2.028-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-serif-modern-fonts-2.028-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-serif-modern-fonts-2.028-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-serif-modern-fonts-2.028-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-sans-medium-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-sans-medium-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-sans-medium-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-sans-medium-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-elite-fonts-3.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-elite-fonts-3.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-elite-fonts-3.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-elite-fonts-3.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-chveulebrivi-fonts-3.002-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-chveulebrivi-fonts-3.002-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-chveulebrivi-fonts-3.002-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-chveulebrivi-fonts-3.002-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-serif-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-serif-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-serif-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-serif-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-sans-modern-fonts-2.025-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-sans-modern-fonts-2.025-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-sans-modern-fonts-2.025-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-sans-modern-fonts-2.025-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-glaho-fonts-9.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-glaho-fonts-9.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-glaho-fonts-9.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-glaho-fonts-9.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-courier-s-fonts-4.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-courier-s-fonts-4.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-courier-s-fonts-4.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-courier-s-fonts-4.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-nino-medium-cond-fonts-4.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-nino-medium-cond-fonts-4.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-nino-medium-cond-fonts-4.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-nino-medium-cond-fonts-4.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-ingiri-fonts-4.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-ingiri-fonts-4.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-ingiri-fonts-4.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-ingiri-fonts-4.000-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-sans-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-sans-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-sans-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-sans-fonts-1.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-excelsior-fonts-2.025-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-excelsior-fonts-2.025-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-excelsior-fonts-2.025-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-excelsior-fonts-2.025-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bpg-algeti-fonts-2.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-algeti-fonts-2.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bpg-algeti-fonts-2.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh bpg-algeti-fonts-2.005-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: lohit-kannada-fonts
lohit-kannada-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: sj-fonts
sj-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: sj-delphine-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh sj-delphine-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: sj-delphine-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh sj-delphine-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: sj-stevehand-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh sj-stevehand-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: sj-stevehand-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh sj-stevehand-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: smc-fonts
smc-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: smc-meera-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-meera-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: smc-meera-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-meera-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: smc-suruma-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-suruma-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: smc-suruma-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-suruma-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: smc-kalyani-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-kalyani-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: smc-kalyani-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-kalyani-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: smc-anjalioldlipi-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-anjalioldlipi-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: smc-anjalioldlipi-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-anjalioldlipi-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: smc-dyuthi-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-dyuthi-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: smc-dyuthi-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-dyuthi-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: smc-raghumalayalam-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-raghumalayalam-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: smc-raghumalayalam-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-raghumalayalam-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: smc-rachana-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-rachana-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: smc-rachana-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh smc-rachana-fonts-04.2-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: sazanami-fonts
sazanami-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: sazanami-mincho-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh sazanami-mincho-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: sazanami-mincho-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh sazanami-mincho-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: sazanami-gothic-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh sazanami-gothic-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: sazanami-gothic-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh sazanami-gothic-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: lohit-bengali-fonts
lohit-bengali-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: lohit-bengali-fonts-2.4.3-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-bengali-fonts-2.4.3-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: lohit-bengali-fonts-2.4.3-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-bengali-fonts-2.4.3-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: lohit-maithili-fonts
lohit-maithili-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: silkscreen-fonts
silkscreen-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: silkscreen-expanded-fonts-1.0-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh silkscreen-expanded-fonts-1.0-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: silkscreen-expanded-fonts-1.0-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh silkscreen-expanded-fonts-1.0-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: silkscreen-fonts-1.0-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh silkscreen-fonts-1.0-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: silkscreen-fonts-1.0-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh silkscreen-fonts-1.0-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-decker-fonts
gfs-decker-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-3.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-3.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-3.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-3.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: sil-doulos-fonts
sil-doulos-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: sil-doulos-fonts-4.104-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh sil-doulos-fonts-4.104-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: sil-doulos-fonts-4.104-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh sil-doulos-fonts-4.104-5.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-ambrosia-fonts
gfs-ambrosia-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: khmeros-fonts
khmeros-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: khmeros-bokor-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-bokor-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: khmeros-bokor-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-bokor-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: khmeros-siemreap-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-siemreap-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: khmeros-siemreap-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-siemreap-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: khmeros-handwritten-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-handwritten-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: khmeros-handwritten-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-handwritten-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: khmeros-muol-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-muol-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: khmeros-muol-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-muol-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: khmeros-base-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-base-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: khmeros-base-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-base-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: khmeros-metal-chrieng-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-metal-chrieng-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: khmeros-metal-chrieng-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-metal-chrieng-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: khmeros-battambang-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-battambang-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: khmeros-battambang-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh khmeros-battambang-fonts-5.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts
gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-12.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-12.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-12.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-12.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: oflb-smonohand-fonts
oflb-smonohand-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: lohit-kashmiri-fonts
lohit-kashmiri-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: lohit-kashmiri-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-kashmiri-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: lohit-kashmiri-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-kashmiri-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: tiresias-fonts
tiresias-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tiresias-sign-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-sign-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: tiresias-sign-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-sign-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: tiresias-pc-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-pc-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: tiresias-pc-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-pc-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: tiresias-pc-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-pc-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: tiresias-pc-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-pc-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: tiresias-info-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-info-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: tiresias-info-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-info-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: tiresias-key-v2-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-key-v2-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: tiresias-key-v2-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-key-v2-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: tiresias-lp-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-lp-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: tiresias-lp-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-lp-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: tiresias-sign-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-sign-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: tiresias-sign-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-sign-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: tiresias-info-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-info-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: tiresias-info-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh tiresias-info-z-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-garaldus-fonts
gfs-garaldus-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-jackson-fonts
gfs-jackson-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts
kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20020502-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20020502-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20020502-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20020502-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-nicefore-fonts
gfs-nicefore-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: nafees-web-naskh-fonts
nafees-web-naskh-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.2-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.2-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.2-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.2-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: lohit-hindi-fonts
lohit-hindi-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: baekmuk-bdf-fonts
baekmuk-bdf-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-8.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-8.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-8.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-8.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-ignacio-fonts
gfs-ignacio-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: brettfont-fonts
brettfont-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: brettfont-fonts-20080506-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh brettfont-fonts-20080506-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: brettfont-fonts-20080506-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh brettfont-fonts-20080506-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: knm-new-fixed-fonts
knm-new-fixed-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: fonts-KOI8-R
fonts-KOI8-R has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-12.fc12.noarch requires /usr/bin/perl fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-12.fc12.noarch requires perl(strict) On ppc64: fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-12.fc12.noarch requires /usr/bin/perl fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-12.fc12.noarch requires perl(strict) Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: wqy-unibit-fonts
wqy-unibit-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: wqy-unibit-fonts-1.1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh wqy-unibit-fonts-1.1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: wqy-unibit-fonts-1.1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh wqy-unibit-fonts-1.1.0-7.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: adf-accanthis-fonts
adf-accanthis-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: adf-accanthis-3-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh adf-accanthis-3-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: adf-accanthis-3-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh adf-accanthis-3-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: adf-accanthis-2-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh adf-accanthis-2-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: adf-accanthis-2-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh adf-accanthis-2-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: adf-accanthis-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh adf-accanthis-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: adf-accanthis-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh adf-accanthis-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-bodoni-fonts
gfs-bodoni-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-11.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-11.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-11.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-11.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: libfontenc
libfontenc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6()(64bit) libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires /sbin/ldconfig libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires rtld(GNU_HASH) libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires /sbin/ldconfig libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) On ppc64: libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6()(64bit) libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires /sbin/ldconfig libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires rtld(GNU_HASH) libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires /sbin/ldconfig libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libfontenc-1.0.5-2.fc12.ppc64 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: adf-tribun-fonts
adf-tribun-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: adf-tribun-fonts-1.13-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh adf-tribun-fonts-1.13-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: adf-tribun-fonts-1.13-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh adf-tribun-fonts-1.13-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: ipa-pmincho-fonts
ipa-pmincho-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: samyak-fonts
samyak-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: samyak-malayalam-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh samyak-malayalam-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: samyak-malayalam-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh samyak-malayalam-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: samyak-tamil-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh samyak-tamil-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: samyak-tamil-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh samyak-tamil-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: samyak-devanagari-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh samyak-devanagari-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: samyak-devanagari-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh samyak-devanagari-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: samyak-oriya-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh samyak-oriya-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: samyak-oriya-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh samyak-oriya-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: samyak-gujarati-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh samyak-gujarati-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: samyak-gujarati-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh samyak-gujarati-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: woodardworks-laconic-fonts
woodardworks-laconic-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: woodardworks-laconic-shadow-fonts-001.001-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh woodardworks-laconic-shadow-fonts-001.001-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: woodardworks-laconic-shadow-fonts-001.001-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh woodardworks-laconic-shadow-fonts-001.001-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: urw-fonts
urw-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: urw-fonts-2.4-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh urw-fonts-2.4-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: urw-fonts-2.4-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh urw-fonts-2.4-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-olga-fonts
gfs-olga-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-11.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-11.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-11.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-11.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts
drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts
chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: icelandic-fonts
icelandic-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: icelandic-fonts-1.001-8.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh icelandic-fonts-1.001-8.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: icelandic-fonts-1.001-8.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh icelandic-fonts-1.001-8.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: ipa-mincho-fonts
ipa-mincho-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-4.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-porson-fonts
gfs-porson-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-13.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-13.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-13.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-13.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: drehatlas-widelands-fonts
drehatlas-widelands-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-fleischman-fonts
gfs-fleischman-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-6.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: fontpackages
fontpackages has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: fontpackages-tools-1.31-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/bash fontpackages-tools-1.31-2.fc13.noarch requires fontforge fontpackages-tools-1.31-2.fc13.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Std) fontpackages-tools-1.31-2.fc13.noarch requires /usr/bin/perl fontpackages-tools-1.31-2.fc13.noarch requires perl(Unicode::UCD) On ppc64: fontpackages-tools-1.31-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/bash fontpackages-tools-1.31-2.fc13.noarch requires fontforge fontpackages-tools-1.31-2.fc13.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Std) fontpackages-tools-1.31-2.fc13.noarch requires /usr/bin/perl fontpackages-tools-1.31-2.fc13.noarch requires perl(Unicode::UCD) Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts
msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-1.001-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-1.001-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-1.001-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-1.001-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: lohit-malayalam-fonts
lohit-malayalam-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts
hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-20070504-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-20070504-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-20070504-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-20070504-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-20070504-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-20070504-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-20070504-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-20070504-3.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gargi-fonts
gargi-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: gfs-didot-fonts
gfs-didot-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-12.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-12.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-12.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-12.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: bitmap-fonts
bitmap-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: bitmap-fonts-0.3-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh bitmap-fonts-0.3-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bitmap-fonts-0.3-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh bitmap-fonts-0.3-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc: bitmap-cjk-fonts-0.3-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh bitmap-cjk-fonts-0.3-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: bitmap-cjk-fonts-0.3-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh bitmap-cjk-fonts-0.3-9.fc13.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: cf-bonveno-fonts
cf-bonveno-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-9.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-9.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-9.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-9.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts
chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: lohit-nepali-fonts
lohit-nepali-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: lohit-nepali-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-nepali-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: lohit-nepali-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-nepali-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: lohit-oriya-fonts
lohit-oriya-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: lohit-oriya-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-oriya-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh On ppc64: lohit-oriya-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh lohit-oriya-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
