Sybase Adaptive Server Anywhere and Fedora 11
Hello My friends, I'm currently heaving some doubts about an update that i need to do. Here it goes. I have to install Fedora 11 with Samba and Sybase Adaptive Server Anywhere, to work with a program manufactured by a third party. Currently there is a server running Red Hat 5.0 with and old Samba and also and old Sybase ASA version 7.0.2. The machine have to be changed to give better LAN processing for the system of the third party. So, i need to migrate the database and the samba file sharing to the Fedora 11 machine, the questions are: Do Fedora have yum package of Sybase? is there any new version for Fedora 11? and the old database of the Sybase version 7.0.2 will work with a new version of Sybase? Hope you can point me in the right direction. -- Fabio Jara Universidad Privada del Este IT Manager Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Update failure
Hello Patel On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 11:58 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 11:37 -0400, Fabio Jara wrote: > > Hello Patel, > > > > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 08:12 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 08:03 -0400, Fabio Jara wrote: > > > > > I hope Tim (ignored_mailbox) will not see your advice. He recently > > > > was > > > > > very angry about yum clean all. Now it's forbidden to give such > > > > advice > > > > > ;-) > > > > Why is that? that worked for me two times in a row now, why is it > > > > forbidden? O_o For future reference. > > > > > > The only reason to use "yum clean all" instead of "yum clean metadata" > > > is if you're running out of space because of cached packages. Then you > > > get to waste bandwidth (not to mention server resources) downloading > > > them again. > > > > > > "yum clean metadata" has solved every problem I've ever had that "yum > > > clean all" would have solved. I would be interested to hear *reasoned* > > > argument about why this might not always be the case (apart from the > > > disk space issue already mentioned). > > > > A while ago i try to update my notebook with yum, and for some reason > > there was a conflict between the kmod-nvidia driver and another package. > > So i did all the normal methods that the error suggest me, also yum > > clean metadata. But when i try to update the same error got me again, so > > i got wild and type yum clean all. Try again and it work! So, that's why > > i suggested to do the same. :) > > > > > > I think that with the package-cleanup --problems and the --dupes > > something was still there, so the clean all remove it. > > That would indicate a bug in "yum clean metadata". If this happens again > you should report it. > > In any case the sequence "yum clean metadata" and only if that doesn't > work then "yum clean all" is perfectly reasonable. > > > And a short time ago i was having almost the same issue, i asked for > > help in the mailing list, and the problem this time was that the package > > have been updated in the mirror but not it's dependencies. So after a > > couple of days the error wasn't there anymore. > > I don't see the relevance of this last comment. If the package > dependencies haven't been updated in a mirror, neither "clean all" nor > "clean metadata" is going to fix the problem. This last comment was just for some people to notice that sometimes the error seems to be the same if the dependencies aren't ready yet, but these errors are not the same. > > poc > My best regards. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Update failure
Hello Patel, On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 08:12 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 08:03 -0400, Fabio Jara wrote: > > > I hope Tim (ignored_mailbox) will not see your advice. He recently > > was > > > very angry about yum clean all. Now it's forbidden to give such > > advice > > > ;-) > > Why is that? that worked for me two times in a row now, why is it > > forbidden? O_o For future reference. > > The only reason to use "yum clean all" instead of "yum clean metadata" > is if you're running out of space because of cached packages. Then you > get to waste bandwidth (not to mention server resources) downloading > them again. > > "yum clean metadata" has solved every problem I've ever had that "yum > clean all" would have solved. I would be interested to hear *reasoned* > argument about why this might not always be the case (apart from the > disk space issue already mentioned). A while ago i try to update my notebook with yum, and for some reason there was a conflict between the kmod-nvidia driver and another package. So i did all the normal methods that the error suggest me, also yum clean metadata. But when i try to update the same error got me again, so i got wild and type yum clean all. Try again and it work! So, that's why i suggested to do the same. :) I think that with the package-cleanup --problems and the --dupes something was still there, so the clean all remove it. And a short time ago i was having almost the same issue, i asked for help in the mailing list, and the problem this time was that the package have been updated in the mirror but not it's dependencies. So after a couple of days the error wasn't there anymore. That's my history XD, a very short one. > poc > My kind regards. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Update failure
Hello Patel, On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 09:56 +0400, Hiisi wrote: > 2009/10/5 Fabio Jara : > > Hello Patel, > > > > I personally recommend to clean all of yum > > > > #yum clean all > > > > After that tray to update normally, if it gives you the same error just > > wait. one or two days. > > > > I have had the same error and trust me, you don't want to force the update > > with > > > > #yum update --skip-broken > > > > I did that, and it gave me a conflict with my nvidia drive, kmod-nvidia. The > > problem is probably that a new package have been release and the mirror your > > connecting does not have all the package yet. > > > > Hope my advice help you. > > I hope Tim (ignored_mailbox) will not see your advice. He recently was > very angry about yum clean all. Now it's forbidden to give such advice > ;-) Why is that? that worked for me two times in a row now, why is it forbidden? O_o For future reference. > > > > > Best regards. > > > <--SNIP--> > > > > -- > Hiisi. > Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/ > -- > Spandex is a privilege, not a right. > -- > SIP: hi...@ekiga.net > -- > pub 1024D/085B139A > -- > Powered by Fedora: > http://fedoraproject.org/ > -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Update failure
Hello Patel, I personally recommend to clean all of yum #yum clean all After that tray to update normally, if it gives you the same error just wait. one or two days. I have had the same error and trust me, you don't want to force the update with #yum update --skip-broken I did that, and it gave me a conflict with my nvidia drive, kmod-nvidia. The problem is probably that a new package have been release and the mirror your connecting does not have all the package yet. Hope my advice help you. Best regards. On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 10/04/2009 10:48 PM, sandeep Patel wrote: > > Hello everyone > > when i do update in fedora 11(x86_64).then it > > shows error like this > > > Please suggest me.what shall i do to get update. > > You seem to be hitting a stale mirror. > > # yum clean metadata > # yum update > > If that doesn't work, try > > # yum update --skip-broken > > Details at > > > http://mether.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/preventing-dependency-breakage-part-ii/ > > Rahul > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines > -- Fabio Jara. Universidad Privada del Este - Paraguay. IT Manager. Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[FINISH] Re: Router in Fedora. Alternative to Mikrotik
Thanks Tim, i actually think the same way as you, i think is better to use the console way of doing things, when i was presented to the Router OS of Mikrotik i think it was marvelous because the time i expend in doing all the same think as the Mikrotik does is way much more. So my question was done in base of the possibly less time in doing my work :D But again, i think you are right., wen there is an update the GUI tools often falls behind. and of course these tools not stain the same "malleability" as the traditional way. So that finish my doubt. Thanks to all that have answer. Best regards. On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Tim wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 12:57 -0400, Fabio Jara wrote: > > After some research about what Peter said i realize that your looking > > about the hardware of mikrotik, i was asking about the ROUTER OS that > > they use con that hardware. Something that can do the same, without > > editing and configuring all those services one by one. I already have > > a Fedora 11 Server with DNS, Apache, Samba, Mysql, DHCP and Squid > > configured and working. What i want to do is manage all of them, like > > adding users to Squid, and setting the bandwidth they can use by > > user, that kind of stuff. A GUI interface is going to save me a lot of > > time. > > > > Also, i have Webmin installed, but it doesn't give me that kind of > > management. > > To be pedantic, you won't manage them all with one interface. Even for > tools for configuring one particular thing, you'll be switching between > different pages for different aspects of the configuration of it. So, > on that note, it's not that different to use different tools to > configure different things. Though, compared to some of the tools that > worked on two or more related, things (different services that work > together), you lose that convenience. > > There's a plethora of GUI configuration tools that can be called up from > the menu, and I think there's still a control centre application which > bungs them all into a window (instead of a menu). > > But I've always found the GUI tools to be limiting. For instance, they > often only supported a small amount of the options you could configure, > and sometimes you had to understand how to manually configure something > to work out the GUI tool, anyway (e.g BIND configuration). > > And, from time to time, they were out of date. The thing that they > configured had changed, over time, but the third-party tool for > configuring them was still doing things the old, and incompatible, way. > > Or they required the configuration file to be set up in a particular > way, or they stored a configuration somewhere else and updated the main > configuration with their own, making it impossible to manually configure > things as well. > > -- > [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r > 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 > > Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I > read messages from the public lists. > > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines > -- Fabio Jara. Universidad Privada del Este - Paraguay. IT Manager. Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [Bulk] Installing Windows afterFedora
I have the same issue about windows, recently the university that i work have buy a package of windows 7 and before that they have the windows Vista and XP. The internal system that they use here to manage all the database of students work only on windows, so i put some effort into Virtual machine work, and find out that it was the best solution to this issue, you can install any windows ( at least in Fedora 11 i have tested ) and it works, you have your own linux machine, you do not need to change to an OS that you aren't used at. Today, i have my Notebook HP with Fedora 11, and two Virtual Machines on it, one with Windows XP and the other with Windows 7. An they work perfectly, and the best side of it is that i have my Fedora :D ( yes, i'm in love with Fedora ). Hope my advice enlighten you to the good side of the force ( yes, that too ) My best regard. On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:15 PM, William Case wrote: > Hi; > > On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 19:19 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > I have managed to go for just under a decade without a Windows machine, > but now > > I need to have such, and I'd like to add it to an existing machine with a > large > > enough partition which was used as work area for a project since shipped. > The > > problem is that while I've put Fedora (and Linux back to SLS and > Slackware on > > 2.2 kernels) on Windows machines, I haven't done it with anything else > after, > > Linux has always been "the last OS you'll ever need" for dual boot. > > > > I'm not worried about the grub.conf, but the boot sector could be an > issue, I > > have seen reports that XP with patches and Win7 check the boot sector now > (XP at > > patch level 3). other than having to rewrite the boot sector, is that > going to > > be an issue? Any other things I should know? > > > > I have had the same problem. What I did was make sure of the grub > instructions I wanted to use and wrote them down or printed them out -- > just in case all else failed and I needed written notes. I made sure > that I knew how to re-install using grub-install or grub or firstaid on > my Fedora LiveCD or the DVD disk. Once I had protected myself, I just > installed WindowsXP and then re-installed grub. > > It was fast and easy (well not installing Windows -- but you know what I > mean). > > This you should double check, but if I remember correctly, you only need > to install Windows on the first partition if you are going to depend on > the Windows boot loader. Otherwise, you can chainload Windows from any > partition as long has you correctly tell grub.conf where the windows > partition is. e.g. > > title Windows XP SP3 >rootnoverify (hd0,5) >chainloader +1 > > if windows has been installed on the first disk, 6th partition. > > > > -- > Regards Bill > Fedora 11, Gnome 2.26.3 > Evo.2.26.3, Emacs 23.1.1 > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines > -- Fabio Jara. Universidad Privada del Este - Paraguay. IT Manager. Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Router in Fedora. Alternative to Mikrotik
Hello again, After some research about what Peter said i realize that your looking about the hardware of mikrotik, i was asking about the ROUTER OS that they use con that hardware. Something that can do the same, without editing and configuring all those services one by one. I already have a Fedora 11 Server with DNS, Apache, Samba, Mysql, DHCP and Squid configured and working. What i want to do is manage all of them, like adding users to Squid, and setting the bandwidth they can use by user, that kind of stuff. A GUI interface is going to save me a lot of time. Also, i have Webmin installed, but it doesn't give me that kind of management. I apologies for my misunderstanding. My sincerest regard. On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Deepak wrote: > What about freeradius (http://freeradius.org). I am just guessing that > you are trying to be an wireless ISP or trying to make hotspot > solution. > > > Regards > Deepak > > -- > == > Registered Linux User #460714 > Currently Using Fedora 10, CentOS 5.3 > == > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines > -- Fabio Jara. Universidad Privada del Este - Paraguay. IT Manager. Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Router in Fedora. Alternative to Mikrotik
Thanks for the replay. I will search more about it Peter. An thanks Bill, currently i have a HTB set up by service, http, download, etc. i was looking for an alternative to it that can do traffic shaping by ip. Thanks again and my best regards. On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Peter Boy wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2009, 18:39 -0400 schrieb Fabio Jara: > > Hello my good friends, recently i have been introduced to a system new > > to me, Mikrotik Router http://www.mikrotik.com/ > > > > I was wandering, is there some alternative to make Fedora work like > > that? i mean, have to configurate all in graphic mode? > > Do you know soekris (http://www.soekris.com) or ALIX or acrosser? They > provide single board computers, with oder without enclosure, and offer > different Linus or BSD distributions. Some models come with VGA and > keyboard/mouse ports. > > > Peter > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines > -- Fabio Jara. Universidad Privada del Este - Paraguay. IT Manager. Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Router in Fedora. Alternative to Mikrotik
Hello my good friends, recently i have been introduced to a system new to me, Mikrotik Router http://www.mikrotik.com/ I was wandering, is there some alternative to make Fedora work like that? i mean, have to configurate all in graphic mode? The real problem that i am facing is that the my network needs some bandwidth control by IP and those ip have to me given by the dhcp as static by MACADDRESS. and have to be routing between the internet and my internal servers of apache, samba, and mysql. Is there something like webmin based but for routing and bandwidth control? Thanks in advance and my best regards to all. -- Fabio Jara. Universidad Privada del Este - Paraguay. IT Manager. Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Yum error - Perl incopatibility
Thanks Michael, i will wait then for the new RPM. Best regards. On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:58:58 -0400, Fabio wrote: > > > gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.13-6.fc11.x86_64 from installed has depsolving > > problems > > --> Missing Dependency: libass.so.3()(64bit) is needed by package > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9791 > ABI-incompatible<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9791%0AABI-incompatible>upgrade > from libass.so.3 to libass.so.4 > > A rebuilt/updated gstreamer-plugins-bad has been published at RPM Fusion > today and may need some time before it is synced by mirrors. > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines > -- Fabio Jara. Universidad Privada del Este - Paraguay. IT Manager. Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Yum error - Perl incopatibility
}.%{arch}\\n perl glibc
> to display what "perl" and "glibc" packages are installed prior to
> a Yum update. You want to clean up your installation (first of all
> the unfinished transactions) and likely get rid of any i?86 packages.
>
> > Transaction Check Error:
> > file /usr/share/doc/glibc-2.10.1/NEWS from install of
> glibc-2.10.1-5.i686
> > conflicts with file from package glibc-2.10.1-2.x86_64
>
> Both ought to be 2.10.1-5, and that it isn't true is an evidence of
> [unfinished] duplicates in your installation.
>
> > file /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/File/Spec.pm conflicts between attempted
> > installs of perl-4:5.10.0-73.fc11.x86_64 and perl-4:5.10.0-68.fc11.i586
>
> Both ought to be 5.10.0-73.fc11, same as above.
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>
--
Fabio Jara.
Universidad Privada del Este - Paraguay.
IT Manager.
Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Yum error - Perl incopatibility
attempted installs of perl-4:5.10.0-73.fc11.x86_64 and perl-4:5.10.0-68.fc11.i586 file /usr/share/man/man3/lib.3pm.gz conflicts between attempted installs of perl-4:5.10.0-73.fc11.x86_64 and perl-4:5.10.0-68.fc11.i586 file /usr/share/man/man3/re.3pm.gz conflicts between attempted installs of perl-4:5.10.0-73.fc11.x86_64 and perl-4:5.10.0-68.fc11.i586 Error Summary - ##End error report## Hope there is a solution, thanks in advance. Best regards. -- Fabio Jara. Universidad Privada del Este - Paraguay. IT Manager. Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Notebook hp dv2313cl Wireless issue.
Steve, its done, the d43 didn't work for me, that's why i started looking for a solution :D The proprietary driver did, thanks for the help. On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:14 AM, steve wrote: > On 09/25/2009 05:25 PM, Fabio Jara wrote: > >> Hello to all, this is my first question to the list. Hope you guys can >> help me. >> >> I have a hp notebook, pavilion dv2313cl with broadcom wireless. Recently >> installed Fedora 11. All the other devices work great, but the broadcom >> doesn't. >> >> Have search google and find some info about using ndiswrapper together >> with the driver for windows vista 64. but can't install ndiswrapper, >> >> Is there a way to install my Broadcom Corporation BCM4311 802.11b/g WLAN? >> > > You can use /either/ > > - The b43 driver (this module is already included in the standard f11 > kernel) along with the correct firmware: > http://www.linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43#device_firmware > > OR > > - The proprietary wl driver from the rpmfusion repositories: > http://fedoramobile.org/fc-wireless/broadcom-linux-sta-driver > > Let us know if this works/doesn't work. > > cheers, > - steve > > -- > random non tech spiel: http://lonetwin.blogspot.com/ > tech randomness: http://lonehacks.blogspot.com/ > what i'm stumbling into: http://lonetwin.stumbleupon.com/ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines > -- Fabio Jara. Universidad Privada del Este - Paraguay. IT Manager. Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Notebook hp dv2313cl Wireless issue.
Hello to all, this is my first question to the list. Hope you guys can help me. I have a hp notebook, pavilion dv2313cl with broadcom wireless. Recently installed Fedora 11. All the other devices work great, but the broadcom doesn't. Have search google and find some info about using ndiswrapper together with the driver for windows vista 64. but can't install ndiswrapper, Is there a way to install my Broadcom Corporation BCM4311 802.11b/g WLAN? Thanks in advance and my sincerest regards. -- Fabio Jara. Universidad Privada del Este. IT Manager. Fedora Ambassador for Paraguay. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
