Re: Subject:,FC12 -- video resolution problems
On 01/01/2010 03:20 AM, fedora-list-requ...@redhat.com wrote: Subject: FC12 -- video resolution problems From: Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:39:34 -0500 To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com I just did a FC12 install on my notebook, blowing away my Centos 5.3 install. Big step up. This is on a HP nc2400 that has the Intel 945M video. It comes up with only 800x600 resolution. So I installed system-config-display and configured the monitor manually to be LCD 1280x1024, but selected only 1024x768. I logged out and logged in, and I came up in 1024x768 video. I then pressed FN-f4 to switch to my external LCD monitor, and things went a bit screwy. I should point out that my monitor is on a Belkin KVM. But this has always worked in Centos. My situation right now is that the system is running both internal and external, and pressing FN-f4 is not getting it to roll through internal, both, external, internal, etc. as it 'use to'. If I power up with the external disconnected, I come up in 1024x768 and then if I plug the external in, it is not sized properly, like it is only 800x600 and thus you only see the center of the screen and only the background, not the running tasks. If I boot up with the external plugged in, the video is 800x600 for both internal and external, and I cannot roll through the modes. So what is going on here and how can I get things working reasonablly??? Hi Robert, I have the same situation, and used the xrandr script which Marko posted a couple of weeks ago. This turns off the laptop screen on startup, BUT anything which was on the laptopp screen gets lost ie, I can't refer to anything which was in the trays. If I then click on the cashew on the external screen hit zoom out, it shows me 2 screen images, the one I am using on the external screen (with the blue blobbackground), the other which appears to be the last laptop image with a plain blue screen. My previous F11 installation used to have the same image on both screens, which I could auto config on my external screen to get it to full screen Fn-f5(Toshiba) would cycle happily throught the both-ext-lap. So far, I've not found an answer! Dave -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Subject:,FC12 -- video resolution problems
On 01/01/2010 05:50 AM, DB wrote: On 01/01/2010 03:20 AM, fedora-list-requ...@redhat.com mailto:fedora-list-requ...@redhat.com wrote: Subject: FC12 -- video resolution problems From: Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com mailto:r...@htt-consult.com Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:39:34 -0500 To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com I just did a FC12 install on my notebook, blowing away my Centos 5.3 install. Big step up. This is on a HP nc2400 that has the Intel 945M video. It comes up with only 800x600 resolution. So I installed system-config-display and configured the monitor manually to be LCD 1280x1024, but selected only 1024x768. I logged out and logged in, and I came up in 1024x768 video. I then pressed FN-f4 to switch to my external LCD monitor, and things went a bit screwy. I should point out that my monitor is on a Belkin KVM. But this has always worked in Centos. My situation right now is that the system is running both internal and external, and pressing FN-f4 is not getting it to roll through internal, both, external, internal, etc. as it 'use to'. If I power up with the external disconnected, I come up in 1024x768 and then if I plug the external in, it is not sized properly, like it is only 800x600 and thus you only see the center of the screen and only the background, not the running tasks. If I boot up with the external plugged in, the video is 800x600 for both internal and external, and I cannot roll through the modes. So what is going on here and how can I get things working reasonablly??? Hi Robert, I have the same situation, and used the xrandr script which Marko posted a couple of weeks ago. This turns off the laptop screen on startup, BUT anything which was on the laptopp screen gets lost ie, I can't refer to anything which was in the trays. If I then click on the cashew on the external screen hit zoom out, it shows me 2 screen images, the one I am using on the external screen (with the blue blobbackground), the other which appears to be the last laptop image with a plain blue screen. My previous F11 installation used to have the same image on both screens, which I could auto config on my external screen to get it to full screen Fn-f5(Toshiba) would cycle happily throught the both-ext-lap. So far, I've not found an answer! Have you filed a bug report? If not, I think it is time to do it -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [Bulk] Re: Subject:,FC12 -- video resolution problems
On 01/01/2010 12:35 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 01/01/2010 05:50 AM, DB wrote: On 01/01/2010 03:20 AM, fedora-list-requ...@redhat.com mailto:fedora-list-requ...@redhat.com wrote: Subject: FC12 -- video resolution problems From: Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com mailto:r...@htt-consult.com Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:39:34 -0500 To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com I just did a FC12 install on my notebook, blowing away my Centos 5.3 install. Big step up. This is on a HP nc2400 that has the Intel 945M video. It comes up with only 800x600 resolution. So I installed system-config-display and configured the monitor manually to be LCD 1280x1024, but selected only 1024x768. I logged out and logged in, and I came up in 1024x768 video. I then pressed FN-f4 to switch to my external LCD monitor, and things went a bit screwy. I should point out that my monitor is on a Belkin KVM. But this has always worked in Centos. My situation right now is that the system is running both internal and external, and pressing FN-f4 is not getting it to roll through internal, both, external, internal, etc. as it 'use to'. If I power up with the external disconnected, I come up in 1024x768 and then if I plug the external in, it is not sized properly, like it is only 800x600 and thus you only see the center of the screen and only the background, not the running tasks. If I boot up with the external plugged in, the video is 800x600 for both internal and external, and I cannot roll through the modes. So what is going on here and how can I get things working reasonablly??? Hi Robert, I have the same situation, and used the xrandr script which Marko posted a couple of weeks ago. This turns off the laptop screen on startup, BUT anything which was on the laptopp screen gets lost ie, I can't refer to anything which was in the trays. If I then click on the cashew on the external screen hit zoom out, it shows me 2 screen images, the one I am using on the external screen (with the blue blobbackground), the other which appears to be the last laptop image with a plain blue screen. My previous F11 installation used to have the same image on both screens, which I could auto config on my external screen to get it to full screen Fn-f5(Toshiba) would cycle happily throught the both-ext-lap. So far, I've not found an answer! Have you filed a bug report? If not, I think it is time to do it Not yet But I've just been googling the net find a number of references toFn-F combinations not having worked in Ubuntu a couple of years ago, and also that Toshiba (apparently) is locked into M$ cannot supply info for Linux. Found that if I use xrandr --output a --same-as b I can get both screens to have (basically) the same image - although not at the same size! But then zoomed out, found the 2 images under each other (rather than side by side) I lost my panel again - wish I knew where they went (probably the same Black Hole where odd socks end up!) Maybe someone from KDE can tell us how to change kcmrandrrc so as to get at least the 2 screens showing the same image on startup! then we can use xrandr to switch the laptop screen on and off... Dave -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [Bulk] Re: Subject:,FC12 -- video resolution problems
On 01/01/2010 07:30 AM, DB wrote: On 01/01/2010 12:35 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 01/01/2010 05:50 AM, DB wrote: On 01/01/2010 03:20 AM, fedora-list-requ...@redhat.com mailto:fedora-list-requ...@redhat.com wrote: Subject: FC12 -- video resolution problems From: Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com mailto:r...@htt-consult.com Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:39:34 -0500 To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com I just did a FC12 install on my notebook, blowing away my Centos 5.3 install. Big step up. This is on a HP nc2400 that has the Intel 945M video. It comes up with only 800x600 resolution. So I installed system-config-display and configured the monitor manually to be LCD 1280x1024, but selected only 1024x768. I logged out and logged in, and I came up in 1024x768 video. I then pressed FN-f4 to switch to my external LCD monitor, and things went a bit screwy. I should point out that my monitor is on a Belkin KVM. But this has always worked in Centos. My situation right now is that the system is running both internal and external, and pressing FN-f4 is not getting it to roll through internal, both, external, internal, etc. as it 'use to'. If I power up with the external disconnected, I come up in 1024x768 and then if I plug the external in, it is not sized properly, like it is only 800x600 and thus you only see the center of the screen and only the background, not the running tasks. If I boot up with the external plugged in, the video is 800x600 for both internal and external, and I cannot roll through the modes. So what is going on here and how can I get things working reasonablly??? Hi Robert, I have the same situation, and used the xrandr script which Marko posted a couple of weeks ago. This turns off the laptop screen on startup, BUT anything which was on the laptopp screen gets lost ie, I can't refer to anything which was in the trays. If I then click on the cashew on the external screen hit zoom out, it shows me 2 screen images, the one I am using on the external screen (with the blue blobbackground), the other which appears to be the last laptop image with a plain blue screen. My previous F11 installation used to have the same image on both screens, which I could auto config on my external screen to get it to full screen Fn-f5(Toshiba) would cycle happily throught the both-ext-lap. So far, I've not found an answer! Have you filed a bug report? If not, I think it is time to do it Not yet But I've just been googling the net find a number of references toFn-F combinations not having worked in Ubuntu a couple of years ago, and also that Toshiba (apparently) is locked into M$ cannot supply info for Linux. Well, mine is an HP and HP ships this unit with either M$ or Ubuntu... Found that if I use xrandr --output a --same-as b I can get both screens to have (basically) the same image - although not at the same size! But then zoomed out, found the 2 images under each other (rather than side by side) I lost my panel again - wish I knew where they went (probably the same Black Hole where odd socks end up!) I can have either the notebook screen at 1024x768, the external at 800x600 with the caveat that the left fw characters are missing, or both at 800x600. Maybe someone from KDE can tell us how to change kcmrandrrc so as to get at least the 2 screens showing the same image on startup! then we can use xrandr to switch the laptop screen on and off... I am using gnome. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[no subject]
-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
Re: (no subject)
Доброе утро (у нас утро ) Честно сказать недоконца понял ваш вопрос но я не работаю FC-12 проблема с дровами на ATI I am having some problems with my install .. but let me add a Thanks to all the FEDORA group this is one of the BEST versions yet todate It could be the LapTop but here is my problems .. I always reformat and install a GOOD copy. Fedora 11 did it and now 12 is doing it i am now running a acer travelmate c310 with 2gig of memory and running at 2 GHz and a 200gig drive 1) Some sounds work like sound effects work with no problem all the time but the output does not work this happens all the time .. windows and 2) cant get the printer working as i need foomatic-db-filesystem = 4.0-6.20090819.fc12 is needed by package foomatic-db-4.0-6.20090819.fc12.noarch (fedora) foomatic-db-ppds = 4.0-6.20090819.fc12 is needed by package foomatic-db-4.0-6.20090819.fc12.noarch (fedora) But it will not find them so non of my work can be printeded 3) . - - dn ps ouo no un sd 's up no . . Apex North America . John Graham Engineering Manager .We don't make mistakes. We just generate learning experiences . Your mileage may vary. . 65 South Washington Street, Donora, Pa 15033 . Main Number (724) 379-8880 or (866) 273-9872 . Fax Number (724) 379-8887 or (866) 273-9329 . Cell Number (412) 287-8291 . Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. Benjamin Franklin The 2nd amendment is the RESET BUTTON on the constitution. ___ Fedora-laptop-list mailing list Fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-laptop-list
Subject F12 and Limewire
I have been trying to install limewire on F12 and I keep getting this message that there is a package missing. I have no such problem with Ubuntu9.1 Unfortunately I have 2 computers and one of them will not operate with Ubuntu versions grater than 6. I have no time to learn 2 different versions of Linux (they are to different) Can you people please give me EXPLICIT instruction on how to install limewire on F12 or better yet fix f12 so that limewire installs or fix the limewire package . This is provably more useful. Thank you Hector Celis -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Subject F12 and Limewire
On 23/11/09 07:36, Hector E. Celis wrote: I have been trying to install limewire on F12 and I keep getting this message that there is a package missing. I have no such problem with Ubuntu9.1 Unfortunately I have 2 computers and one of them will not operate with Ubuntu versions grater than 6. I have no time to learn 2 different versions of Linux (they are to different) Can you people please give me EXPLICIT instruction on how to install limewire on F12 Did you look at: http://fedorasolved.org/post-install-solutions/limewire or better yet fix f12 so that limewire installs or fix the limewire package . This is provably more useful. Thank you Hector Celis Is limewire gpl licensed? -- Regards, Frank Murphy -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Subject F12 and Limewire
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) frankl...@gmail.com wrote: On 23/11/09 07:36, Hector E. Celis wrote: I have been trying to install limewire on F12 and I keep getting this message that there is a package missing. I have no such problem with Ubuntu9.1 Unfortunately I have 2 computers and one of them will not operate with Ubuntu versions grater than 6. I have no time to learn 2 different versions of Linux (they are to different) Can you people please give me EXPLICIT instruction on how to install limewire on F12 Did you look at: http://fedorasolved.org/post-install-solutions/limewire or better yet fix f12 so that limewire installs or fix the limewire package . This is provably more useful. Thank you Hector Celis Is limewire gpl licensed? -- Regards, Frank Murphy -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines Currently limewire is no longer distributed as rpm (now it's a deb): 0. Install JRE (included with Fedora 12) 1. Download limeware as zip from: http://www.limewire.com/download/?os=other 2. Unzip somewhere (/home/USER/) 3. run runLime.sh -- Athmane Madjoudj -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
Hi, I have a problem logging out of Fedora 8.0 The logout window will not appear when the logout icon is clicked on. I have to reboot or shutdown using poweroff. Any ideas ? Phil This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error you should not disseminate, distribute or copy it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail from your system. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 16:39 +, Phil Sharrock wrote: Hi, I have a problem logging out of Fedora 8.0 F8 hasn't been supported for over a year now. The logout window will not appear when the logout icon is clicked on. Which desktop? Gnome? KDE? Other? I have to reboot or shutdown using poweroff. Kill the desktop manager, e.g. (as root) pkill kdm or pkill gdm as appropriate. Or do init 3; init 5. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Why are we writing our msgs in the subject line?
Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com writes: Subject says it all. Tell us about your experience. LG -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
Hi.. Trying to run a simple ldap search/query against a supposedly public ldap server. I've tried a number of copy/paste attempts that I've seen from various sites with no luck... If anyone has successfully pinged/queried a public ldap server from the cmdline, can you post your cmd that you used so I can see what I'm missing.. the site www.emailman.com/ldap/public lists a number of public ldap servers. i'm simply trying to figure out how to query/access the names from one of the ldap servers. as an example, i tried to use: ldapsearch -x -h ldap.bu.edu -b dc=bu,dc=edu (sn=tom*) (but this generates a ldap_bind: protocol error... however, if i do: ldapsearch -x -h stanford.edu -b dc=stanford,dc=edu (sn=tom*) or ldapsearch -x -h usc.edu -b dc=usc,dc=edu (sn=tom*) then i get back a list of data... also, the bu.edu for boston university, works on the website... so, i'm sure i'm missing something simple, but i can't pin it down. any help/pointers would be 'ppreciated! my goal is to be able to understand how to query a public ldap server and to be able to return different data elements.. (ie, name, given, first, or email/phone/etc..) Thanks! -Tom -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
LDAP question (Previously no subject)
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:52:35 -0700, bruce bedoug...@earthlink.net wrote: as an example, i tried to use: ldapsearch -x -h ldap.bu.edu -b dc=bu,dc=edu (sn=tom*) (but this generates a ldap_bind: protocol error... I looked through the man page and tried a couple of things that seemed might work and found the -P 2 option got this query to work. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: LDAP question (Previously no subject)
Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:52:35 -0700, bruce bedoug...@earthlink.net wrote: as an example, i tried to use: ldapsearch -x -h ldap.bu.edu -b dc=bu,dc=edu (sn=tom*) (but this generates a ldap_bind: protocol error... I looked through the man page and tried a couple of things that seemed might work and found the -P 2 option got this query to work. Yes, that forces LDAP protocol V2. By default, newer LDAP clients (and servers) default to LDAP protocol V3, which uses SASL to encrypt the authentication. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer ri...@nerd.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - To err is human, to moo bovine. - -- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: LDAP question (Previously no subject)
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 11:57 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:52:35 -0700, bruce bedoug...@earthlink.net wrote: as an example, i tried to use: ldapsearch -x -h ldap.bu.edu -b dc=bu,dc=edu (sn=tom*) (but this generates a ldap_bind: protocol error... I looked through the man page and tried a couple of things that seemed might work and found the -P 2 option got this query to work. Yes, that forces LDAP protocol V2. By default, newer LDAP clients (and servers) default to LDAP protocol V3, which uses SASL to encrypt the authentication. ignoring the thought that -x disables SASL and it being a 'public LDAP server' that authentication is not required or possible without an account. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: re Subject: F-11 32-bit dial-up connection
On 09/21/2009 10:57 AM, Allan Swanepoel wrote: On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Phill phanb...@yahoo.com mailto:phanb...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi! For seven years I had hoped to get an OS where everything would work well out of the box, to no avail. When I started installing this F-11 I got from a magazine DVD, I thought the day had arrived: everything worked well! Everything, that is, until... Until, kppp already connected to my ISP, I tried both Firefox and Thunderbird, and neither would find the server. I went to Administration/Network Manager, and it showed my modem, but would not activate it. Got two error messages: I can't offer any helpful suggestions. I would like to confirm that Fedora 11 isn't fully supporting dial up. Does anyone know for sure? I have several old machines that I would like to use Fedora on but I will need dial-up support as well. Can anyone confirm this, or suggest a current Linux distro that does fully support dial-up connections? Install wvdial and dialup should work, also kppp might need to be run as root, as it needs to modify ip addresses and add routes to the system. Phill I use KPPP as a non root user. I did have to add GATEWAYDEV=ppp0 to the file /etc/sysconfig/network and nameservers to the /etc/resolv.conf file. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
re Subject: F-11 32-bit dial-up connection
Hi! For seven years I had hoped to get an OS where everything would work well out of the box, to no avail. When I started installing this F-11 I got from a magazine DVD, I thought the day had arrived: everything worked well! Everything, that is, until... Until, kppp already connected to my ISP, I tried both Firefox and Thunderbird, and neither would find the server. I went to Administration/Network Manager, and it showed my modem, but would not activate it. Got two error messages: I can't offer any helpful suggestions. I would like to confirm that Fedora 11 isn't fully supporting dial up. Does anyone know for sure? I have several old machines that I would like to use Fedora on but I will need dial-up support as well. Can anyone confirm this, or suggest a current Linux distro that does fully support dial-up connections? Phill -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: re Subject: F-11 32-bit dial-up connection
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Phill phanb...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi! For seven years I had hoped to get an OS where everything would work well out of the box, to no avail. When I started installing this F-11 I got from a magazine DVD, I thought the day had arrived: everything worked well! Everything, that is, until... Until, kppp already connected to my ISP, I tried both Firefox and Thunderbird, and neither would find the server. I went to Administration/Network Manager, and it showed my modem, but would not activate it. Got two error messages: I can't offer any helpful suggestions. I would like to confirm that Fedora 11 isn't fully supporting dial up. Does anyone know for sure? I have several old machines that I would like to use Fedora on but I will need dial-up support as well. Can anyone confirm this, or suggest a current Linux distro that does fully support dial-up connections? Install wvdial and dialup should work, also kppp might need to be run as root, as it needs to modify ip addresses and add routes to the system. Phill -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- We live in an age when pizza gets to your home before the police. - Jeff Marder -- Allan Swanepoel allanice...@gmail.com allanice@unix.net dragonmas...@linaccess.com +27 71 850 5554 Linux User #452990 Linux Machine #360914 --- IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the yorkshire terrier next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from Microsoft: However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: re Subject: F-11 32-bit dial-up connection
Phill wrote: I can't offer any helpful suggestions. I would like to confirm that Fedora 11 isn't fully supporting dial up. Does anyone know for sure? I have several old machines that I would like to use Fedora on but I will need dial-up support as well. Can anyone confirm this, or suggest a current Linux distro that does fully support dial-up connections? There’s a current thread called “wvdial problem” that you should read: it seems to be dealing with the same problems. Certainly people seem to have got dial-up to work with Fedora. Having said that, note that you may find it difficult to keep Fedora up-to-date over a dial-up connection: there are a lot of updates, many of which are security-related. The yum-presto package will transfer them more efficiently, but you may still want to occasionally plug these systems into a faster connection (or find some other way of getting large updates to them). Hope this helps, James. -- E-mail: james@ | That's like saying that a squirrel is 48% juicier than aprilcottage.co.uk | an orange - maybe it's true, but anybody who puts the | two in a blender to compare them is kind of sick. | -- Linus Torvalds -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
I am getting the below error message... and at a lost... could someone please help? Thanks in advanced! Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [ cut here ] Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: Badness at fs/quota/dquot.c:964 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: NIP: c018a754 LR: c018a724 CTR: c018a698 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: REGS: efb0da00 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.30.5-43.fc11.ppc.smp) Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: MSR: 00029032 EE,ME,CE,IR,DR CR: 28008028 XER: Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: TASK = ef92ae80[27] 'pdflush' THREAD: efb0c000 CPU: 0 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: GPR00: 0001 efb0dab0 ef92ae80 c078ea60 0015 0015 2000 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: GPR08: ef4510a0 1000 22008042 c057b42c 0001 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: GPR16: ef5880f0 0001 95f9 95f8 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: GPR24: c079 ee673350 ef5880f0 ef5ad1b0 2000 ee673350 efb0dab0 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: NIP [c018a754] dquot_claim_space+0xbc/0x1ec Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: LR [c018a724] dquot_claim_space+0x8c/0x1ec Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: Call Trace: Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0dab0] [c018a724] dquot_claim_space+0x8c/0x1ec (unreliable) Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0dad0] [c01ecbd0] ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x4a0/0x5ac Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0db20] [c01f17ac] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x308/0x64c Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0db90] [c01e749c] ext4_ext_get_blocks+0xd0c/0xfc8 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0dc70] [c01cf918] ext4_get_blocks_wrap+0x174/0x358 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0dcb0] [c01d18b0] mpage_da_map_blocks+0xe8/0x77c Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0dd90] [c01d2294] ext4_da_writepages+0x350/0x570 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0de40] [c00f9fe4] do_writepages+0x60/0x9c Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0de50] [c015d3ec] __writeback_single_inode+0x184/0x324 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0dea0] [c015db48] generic_sync_sb_inodes+0x2b4/0x46c Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0def0] [c015e058] writeback_inodes+0xec/0x178 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0df20] [c00fa2a8] wb_kupdate+0x104/0x1ac Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0df80] [c00fb7e4] pdflush+0x180/0x284 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0dfd0] [c00856d8] kthread+0x68/0xb0 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [efb0dff0] [c0019ef0] kernel_thread+0x4c/0x68 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: Instruction dump: Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: 813e0104 2f89 419e005c 81690078 3800 7f8be000 419c0014 40be0014 Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: 8169007c 7f8be840 409c0008 3801 0f00 81690070 81890074 80e90078 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
How do I change my web address home page, when you type bizalions.com I get the fedora test page. I deleted my landing page and my web site is now one page and the address www.bizalions.com/giftpage.html. -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
Re: (no subject)
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, FRANCOIS HELEN BIZALION wrote: How do I change my web address home page, when you type bizalions.com I get the fedora test page.I deleted my landing page and my web site is now one page and the address www.bizalions.com/giftpage.html. From http://www.bizalions.com/: You may now add content to the directory /var/www/html/. Note that until you do so, people visiting your website will see this page, and not your content. To prevent this page from ever being used, follow the instructions in the file /etc/httpd/conf.d/welcome.conf. -Mike -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
Re: (no subject)
On 08/18/2009 03:45 PM, Sharpe, Sam J wrote: Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a very successful, profitable product line, which many people buy. I'm not sure how many of them are Fedora users and I'm not sure how much Red Hat cares either way - people like you are not the target market. True. Aside from that, RHEL by definition targets the enterprise market. Centos provides the same bits, but does target a similar business market, and Fedora targets the consumers, and allows us to do some testing so that when released, RHEL will be a better product. But, RHEL does allow Red Hat to employ professionals who do contribute to the kernel as well as other Linux components which effectively contributes to making Linux in general better. -- Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
On 08/18/2009 09:24 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote: Unfortunately, the legal approach of Mr Sundaram still doesn't answer this enigma: if proprietary document formatting is just defining an awfully more complex and secret way of producing bold than B/B, then what are media codecs exactly? Already answered in the FAQ. Read it carefully. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 08/18/2009 09:24 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote: Unfortunately, the legal approach of Mr Sundaram still doesn't answer this enigma: if proprietary document formatting is just defining an awfully more complex and secret way of producing bold than B/B, then what are media codecs exactly? Already answered in the FAQ. Read it carefully. Rahul Media formats almost always involve lossy compression There are reasons for selecting one lossy compression scheme over another that are very different from considerations of document formatting, which do seem to be primarily a way of keeping things proprietary. Lossy compression is still very much a topic of ongoing research. If someone comes up with a clever scheme for lowering the bit count while minimizing the subjective loss, that person could reasonably claim it as intellectual property. I'm not plugging the proprietary software distribution paradigm, just saying. Of course, media formats are also entangled with digital rights management, which has everything to do with the issues addressed in your FAQ. Generally these work against usability, data efficiency and quality. I won't touch here the debate over music wanting to be free vs. musicians wanting to be paid and the extent to which DRM accomplishes the latter, other than to point out that it is frequently and plausibly argued that musicians are pretty much the last people DRM protects, if at all. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
2009/8/18 gil...@altern.org: Does Red Hat really think that Fedora users will buy RHEL because they dig GIMP 2.2 so much? Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a very successful, profitable product line, which many people buy. I'm not sure how many of them are Fedora users and I'm not sure how much Red Hat cares either way - people like you are not the target market. -- Sam -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
Sorry, I've deleted the FAQ on Software Patents started by Rahul Sundaram. so I'll have to answer in a new thread. Rahul Sundaram wrote: From time to time, the same questions come up on MP3 and other patent related things and I have written up some answers at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Software_Patents If you have other related questions, feel free to ask and I will try to answer them in the wiki. Note that I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. This almost looks like a follow-up to the thread What are Microsoft codecs? that some real Linux lovers pretty much succeeded in trashing. Unfortunately, the legal approach of Mr Sundaram still doesn't answer this enigma: if proprietary document formatting is just defining an awfully more complex and secret way of producing bold than B/B, then what are media codecs exactly? But I'm sure all those who pretended that fedora-list wasn't the place to hold such a discussion will be happy to join in. As for myself, I'll just suggest another subject for reflection. While most Fedora supporters here agree with Microsoft that market share is totally unimportant to Fedora, while Ubuntu LTS is released every second year and supported for 5 on servers, will Red Hat leave the road open to former Thawte CEO to get all the user base? Does Red Hat really think that Fedora users will buy RHEL because they dig GIMP 2.2 so much? I had a fair chance to observe how non-profit organisations were run in the recent years and I really thought that a company on the Stock Exchange would be different. Now, I'm beginning to wonder. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject) was FAQ on
Software Patents To: encouragement and advice for using Fedora.Community assistance fedora-list@redhat.com In-Reply-To: 50762.216.239.89.138.1250567653.squir...@altern.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sorry, I've deleted the FAQ on Software Patents started by Rahul Sundaram. so I'll have to answer in a new thread. You could have waited a while for someone else to reply to that thread, and begin from there :), or you were too anxious to reply! Rahul Sundaram wrote: From time to time, the same questions come up on MP3 and other patent related things and I have written up some answers at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Software_Patents If you have other related questions, feel free to ask and I will try to answer them in the wiki. Note that I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. This almost looks like a follow-up to the thread What are Microsoft codecs? that some real Linux lovers pretty much succeeded in trashing. What do you mean trashing? Could you explain a bit? Unfortunately, the legal approach of Mr Sundaram still doesn't answer this enigma: if proprietary document formatting is just defining an awfully more complex and secret way of producing bold than B/B, then what are media codecs exactly? Media codecs are *different* from encodings, xml stuff, and other proprietary layers added by Micro$oft to their products like word documents, excel files, powerpoint, etc. Media codecs are a different animal and not necessarily from Micro$oft alone. Thankfully there are many media players that can play them and we have been told to install the good, the bad and the ugly and most of them can be played. Sadly, not everything works, but this happens not only with Fedora. A friend of mine pokes fun at me because I use Fedora linux and he tells me that nobody gives a sh*t about it and that is why it does not get attacked by hackers, virii, spyware, adware, trojan horse, ..., etc as much as Micro$oft Windows does. This is hard to swallow, but I tell him that I like Fedora and Linux Distros in general and I dont mind the being in the 1% category. He says 99% of the world uses M$ and you are in the rare type that uses Linux. But I can live with that. But I'm sure all those who pretended that fedora-list wasn't the place to hold such a discussion will be happy to join in. The discussion reminds me of a Bill Parcell's quote: This conversation is going nowhere, that he made sometime ago and was made into a Coors Beer commercial and it can be applied here. As much as we discuss issues like this. It does not make much of a difference. I hate to say it, but it is true. Fedora will not go against any laws that are established to protect intellectual property like patents, mp3, dvd playback, libdvdcss2, flash, ..., etc. You name it. Fedora will not deviate from what it has done in the past nor I see it happen in the future :) As for myself, I'll just suggest another subject for reflection. While most Fedora supporters here agree with Microsoft that market share is totally unimportant to Fedora, while Ubuntu LTS is released every second year and supported for 5 on servers, will Red Hat leave the road open to former Thawte CEO to get all the user base? Does Red Hat really think that Fedora users will buy RHEL because they dig GIMP 2.2 so much? Whether they dig GIMP 2.2 does not make a difference as to whether users will buy RHEL. That makes no sense to me and I am sure others. RHEL is a subscription based distro(correct me if I am wrong). You do not pay for the software, you are paying for the services provided by Red Hat. I had a fair chance to observe how non-profit organisations were run in the recent years and I really thought that a company on the Stock Exchange would be different. Now, I'm beginning to wonder. Every company is different, but to each their own. -- Ubuntu LTS is something else and Fedora makes no apparent threat to it. One is free to use whichever version of Linux that is out there. If you like Ubuntu, then go for it. I am not going to say anything bad about it. Fedora is just a bit different from them. My $0.02 Regards, Antonio -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject) was FAQ on
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 20:16 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote: A friend of mine pokes fun at me because I use Fedora linux and he tells me that nobody gives a sh*t about it and that is why it does not get attacked by hackers, virii, spyware, adware, trojan horse, ..., etc as much as Micro$oft Windows does. This is hard to swallow, but I tell him that I like Fedora and Linux Distros in general and I dont mind the being in the 1% category. He says 99% of the world uses M$ and you are in the rare type that uses Linux. But I can live with that. I, and many others, use it precisely because it is not Windows. The day it clones it, is the day we find something else to use. It does what we tell it to. We can find out how it works. We can change how it works. We can fix the problems. We can customise it. We're not slaves to malware and anti-malware software. We're not slaves to lock-in and data kidnapping by proprietary data formats (I've personally experienced lock-out of data when programs have become unavailable). We don't have to pay ten times over to install it on ten computers. We don't have to pay ten times over because ten different people access the same computer. We don't have systems that artificially restrict the number of users that can use it at the same time. It's a damn sight more reliable... -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject) was FAQ on
gilpel: This almost looks like a follow-up to the thread What are Microsoft codecs? that some real Linux lovers pretty much succeeded in trashing. Antonio Olivares: What do you mean trashing? Could you explain a bit? People who knew more than they did tore open all the holes in the spurious arguments. i.e. They were wrong, but won't admit it. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 08:54 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote: Does Red Hat really think that Fedora users will buy RHEL because they dig GIMP 2.2 so much? No. Clearly you don't understand, and don't want to understand. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
2009/8/13 Markus Kesaromous remotes...@live.com: Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:01:25 +0100 Subject: Re: (no subject) From: snecklif...@gmail.com To: remotes...@live.com Hi Markus, 2009/8/12 Markus Kesaromous : Dear List, I searched the ath9k source directory /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.29/linux-2.6.29.i586/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k for any strings that would hint/suggest support for the Atheros 9220/9223 chipset. I saw no such strings. What strings were you looking for? I stated: for any strings that would hint/suggest support for the Atheros 9220/9223 (meaning 9220 or 9223 ala grep '922[0-9]' * (within the ath9k directory). So, I emailed Atheros.com sales dept. and asked if they intend to provide an open source driver for the AR9000 series chipsets, esp. the AR9220/AR9223. They replied that they already DO support the AR92xx chipset in the ath9k driver. Before I go out and purchase the mini-pci card, is it true that the ath9k driver has ineed been tested to fully support AR9220/AR9223 chipsets?? Your thought process intrigues me. If you have communication from the manufacturer advising it is supported then you have your answer (and a waterproof returns policy if they are wrong). I have learned never to trust sales people. When it comes to dealing with online merchants, what the sales contact at the manufacturer says will not be sufficient reason for return for a full refund, of a device which turns out to be unsupported. Then why contact them? My question to you is - why do you have to resort to assuming such a pompous attitude via questions like Your thought process intrigues me. I'm afraid this is your interpretation. There is a fitting description for such attitude, but I will not spam this mailing list with such a vivid description. Then please reply off-list, as I did. Some basic investigation on the web will tell you what you need to know: http://wiki.debian.org/ath9k#supported No really, that's my pleasure. -- Christopher Brown ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
RE: (no subject)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:01:25 +0100 Subject: Re: (no subject) From: snecklif...@gmail.com To: remotes...@live.com Hi Markus, 2009/8/12 Markus Kesaromous : Dear List, I searched the ath9k source directory /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.29/linux-2.6.29.i586/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k for any strings that would hint/suggest support for the Atheros 9220/9223 chipset. I saw no such strings. What strings were you looking for? I stated: for any strings that would hint/suggest support for the Atheros 9220/9223 (meaning 9220 or 9223 ala grep '922[0-9]' * (within the ath9k directory). So, I emailed Atheros.com sales dept. and asked if they intend to provide an open source driver for the AR9000 series chipsets, esp. the AR9220/AR9223. They replied that they already DO support the AR92xx chipset in the ath9k driver. Before I go out and purchase the mini-pci card, is it true that the ath9k driver has ineed been tested to fully support AR9220/AR9223 chipsets?? Your thought process intrigues me. If you have communication from the manufacturer advising it is supported then you have your answer (and a waterproof returns policy if they are wrong). I have learned never to trust sales people. When it comes to dealing with online merchants, what the sales contact at the manufacturer says will not be sufficient reason for return for a full refund, of a device which turns out to be unsupported. My question to you is - why do you have to resort to assuming such a pompous attitude via questions like Your thought process intrigues me. There is a fitting description for such attitude, but I will not spam this mailing list with such a vivid description. Some basic investigation on the web will tell you what you need to know: http://wiki.debian.org/ath9k#supported Generally I just plug shit in and it works. Christopher Brown _ Get your vacation photos on your phone! http://windowsliveformobile.com/en-us/photos/default.aspx?OCID=0809TL-HM ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] (no subject)
On 10/08/09 08:23, Akila Nanayakkara wrote: i requested for dedora live cd or dvd. but i'm unaware of how to get it. here is my address, if you have any avalability send it to me. else give me a help to take it. thank you No 31/1A pahala imbulgoga, imbulgoda. Sri Lanka As the Freemedia is closed for maintenance August. Contact a local Fedora Ambassador: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/MembershipService/Verification#Sri_Lanka_.284.29 Regards, Frank -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
(no subject)
Was: kmod-nvidia revisited. hijacking another thread Phil Meyer wrote: On 08/06/2009 01:11 PM, Michael Hannon wrote: A new kernel comes out that is important to you. The kmod-XXX modules will normally lag a new kernel for a week in testing I had the nvidia driver installed for the last 2 kernel updates and the lag was about 24 hours. , and you don't want to wait. The akmod tools will rebuild the kernel module(s) for you on the boot of the new kernel. Really? I thought it involved some extra manip. Here's my last kmod upgrade: Aug 06 14:34:22 Updated: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-185.18.31-1.fc11.x86_64 Aug 06 14:34:22 Updated: kmod-nvidia-185.18.31-1.fc11.x86_64 Aug 06 14:34:24 Updated: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-185.18.31-1.fc11.x86_64 Aug 06 14:34:29 Updated: kmod-nvidia-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.x86_64-185.18.29-1.fc11.x86_64 Aug 06 14:34:36 Installed: kmod-nvidia-2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64-185.18.31-1.fc11.x86_64 akmod will do all this automatically? The next time you update and there is a newer version of the kmod-XXX available, you will get it. Why is that if akmod has already done the job? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
Building latest F11 kernel 2.6.29.6-213 ... # amke install modules_install . . . WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.29.6-215.fc11.i586/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.ko needs unknown symbol speedstep_get_processor_frequency WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.29.6-215.fc11.i586/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.ko needs unknown symbol speedstep_detect_processor There are 2 platforms in the config menu for cpu frequency control: AMD and Intel. My machine is AMD, so I unchecked Intel - only to find that AMD cpu speed control depends on functions common to both platforms, which requires that I build it for both cpu's. Clearly, the code for one platform must be made indpenedent of the other. MK _ NEW mobile Hotmail. Optimized for YOUR phone. Click here. http://windowslive.com/Mobile?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_CS_MB_new_hotmail_072009 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: processor modules, Was: (no subject)
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 19:14 -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote: Building latest F11 kernel 2.6.29.6-213 ... # amke install modules_install . . . WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.29.6-215.fc11.i586/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.ko needs unknown symbol speedstep_get_processor_frequency WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.29.6-215.fc11.i586/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.ko needs unknown symbol speedstep_detect_processor There are 2 platforms in the config menu for cpu frequency control: AMD and Intel. My machine is AMD, so I unchecked Intel - only to find that AMD cpu speed control depends on functions common to both platforms, which requires that I build it for both cpu's. Clearly, the code for one platform must be made indpenedent of the other. there is http://bugzilla.redhat.com for reporting these things. This list is not the place to report. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Bug 509631] pango's preload.1.gz man page is on an unrelated subject and duplicates pango-view.1.gz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509631 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-07-22 12:54:29 EDT --- Fixed in 1.24.5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
(no subject)
(Apologies for messing up the threading yet one more time, and for cluttering up the fedora thread with more stuff that is only semi- relevant here.) Michael Eager wrote, ... Compilers determine what modifications they can make to the code using the inferences they make based on the data flow through a program. They don't say well, this is undefined, we can muck it up however we like. In the case of this *kernel* bug, the compiler determined that the pointer must be valid, because it had been previously dereferenced. Would it be entirely inappropriate to have a compiler switch that would cause the compiler to issue warnings when pointers are used without testing after being returned from functions calls? This allowed the compiler to eliminate a test which would always be false, *as long as the behavior of the previous code was defined*. Which is a problem, because the compiler authors are fully aware that dereferencing a pointer without testing is a common bug. This code is correct and well defined as long as the pointer is valid. Only if you can assume that the dereference after the function call and before any comparison must indicate that the programer knows the function will always return a valid pointer. Otherwise, the code, as it was, was not well defined. The behavior only becomes undefined when the pointer is null. The only way that the compiler could determine that the initial dereference of the pointer was undefined would be to insert a test for null before the dereference. That would be non-standard behavior, and potentially incorrect. And, if it could solve the problem, it would indicate that the dereference before testing could, and should have been flagged with a warning. It would have to do this for every piece of code which dereferenced a pointer which was passed into a function, dramatically impacting performance. Or perhaps it could issue a warning message saying that it couldn't determine that the pointer was valid, resulting in a warning that would occur thousands of times when compiling the kernel. If this kind of code really occurs that often in the kernel, we have serious problems. OK, what would reasonable, sane people do in that case? That's right, they'd fall back on the behavior of just doing what the program source code says, but no, gcc is too smart for that, gcc's undefined behavior shows how smart it is and therefore makes much more sense than doing the obvious :-). You can get exactly that behavior by not optimizing your code. Your code will run much slower, but that's OK, isn't it? Ah, you want optimizations? But you want them to magically decide that one is an error in the program and shouldn't be done, while in another place the same optimization should be done because it generates better code. OK, write a description of how to determine one case from the other and I'm sure every compiler developer will rush to implement it. Actually, it's fairly simple. The default warning option for discarding code should be to issue a warning about discarded code. Discarded code generally indicates that the programmer did not say what he meant, and that is usually a no-no in kernels. And, IMNSHO, in any other application, the programer should be required to insist that discarded code can safely be ignored, via pragma or switch. Yeah, this sort of debate would be more appropriate in the compiler developers' mailing list. I feel like letting a little steam off, and I don't feel like signing up for yet another mailing list. So sue me. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
Hallo, Webmaster, I'm reinstalling Fedora 11, and this time it is taking a lot of hours (I began this morning, I'm now in the package 480 of 1157!!!), and I wonder if there' s a problem on the server here in The Netherlands or it is just that something crashed in my computer... Greetings, Toni _ Drag n’ drop—Get easy photo sharing with Windows Live™ Photos. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/photos.aspx-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
(no subject)
sir/mamAs a regular fedora user I want to report that I find this content on your page I may be there is some problem with the application or page hope you find this info useful Database error From FedoraProject Jump to: navigation, search A database query syntax error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software. The last attempted database query was: (SQL query hidden) from within function Database::begin. MySQL returned error 2013: Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 111 (db1). Retrieved from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites; Category: Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here http://cricket.yahoo.com-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
Re: (no subject)
On 2009-07-08 01:04:19 AM, Rituraj Tyagi wrote: As a regular fedora user I want to report that I find this content on your page I may be there is some problem with the application or page hope you find this info useful Database error From FedoraProject Jump to: navigation, search A database query syntax error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software. The last attempted database query was: (SQL query hidden) from within function Database::begin. MySQL returned error 2013: Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 111 (db1). Retrieved from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites; Category: Hi, thanks a lot for your report. We think this may have happened due to a mysql restart that occurred today. Please let us know if continue to see this error. Thanks a lot, Ricky pgpaZyUNGWUNc.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
[Bug 509631] New: pango's preload.1.gz man page is on an unrelated subject and duplicates pango-view.1.gz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: pango's preload.1.gz man page is on an unrelated subject and duplicates pango-view.1.gz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509631 Summary: pango's preload.1.gz man page is on an unrelated subject and duplicates pango-view.1.gz Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: daw-redhatbugzi...@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: pango installs a man page in the file /usr/share/man/man1/preload.1.gz but that man page has nothing to do with preload; it is a man page for pango-view. Actually, /usr/share/man/man1/preload.1.gz is an exact duplicate of /usr/share/man/man1/pango-view.1.gz. This looks like a bug. Perhaps .../preload.1.gz should be deleted and not provided by pango? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
Yes, i use dual boot but on win it works, i restart and F11 turn off the wireless hardware...how can i swich it on one time for ever? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 28/06/2009 1.12 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you use dual-boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39; #39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http://fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http://dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www. dnmouse. org/broadcom. html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee. org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux- hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem
Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
Try this: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' Do you have RPM Fusion repositories enabled? 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: Yes, i use dual boot but on win it works, i restart and F11 turn off the wireless hardware...how can i swich it on one time for ever? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 28/06/2009 1.12 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you use dual-boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39; #39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http://fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http://dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www. dnmouse. org/broadcom. html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee. org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand
Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
RPM Fusion is enabled (checked) i tryed your command...now i can see in systemadministrationnetwork the wlan0 but i cannot connect to my wireless network... Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.15 A: Ivan Dell'Oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' Do you have RPM Fusion repositories enabled? 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: Yes, i use dual boot but on win it works, i restart and F11 turn off the wireless hardware...how can i swich it on one time for ever? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 28/06/2009 1.12 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you use dual-boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39; #39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http://fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http: //dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www. dnmouse. org/broadcom. html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee. org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7: 22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version
Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
Try this (as root): yum install broadcom-wl kmod-wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: RPM Fusion is enabled (checked) i tryed your command...now i can see in systemadministrationnetwork the wlan0 but i cannot connect to my wireless network... Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.15 A: Ivan Dell'Oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' Do you have RPM Fusion repositories enabled? 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: Yes, i use dual boot but on win it works, i restart and F11 turn off the wireless hardware...how can i swich it on one time for ever? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 28/06/2009 1.12 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you use dual-boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39; #39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http://fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http: //dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www. dnmouse. org/broadcom. html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee. org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7: 22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution
Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
i tryed, it says: Error: b43 conflicts with broacom-wl Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.55 A: Ivan Dell'Oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this (as root): yum install broadcom-wl kmod-wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: RPM Fusion is enabled (checked) i tryed your command...now i can see in systemadministrationnetwork the wlan0 but i cannot connect to my wireless network... Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.15 A: Ivan Dell'Oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe. conf' Do you have RPM Fusion repositories enabled? 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: Yes, i use dual boot but on win it works, i restart and F11 turn off the wireless hardware...how can i swich it on one time for ever? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 28/06/2009 1.12 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you use dual-boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39; #39; #39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39; #39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http: //fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http: //dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www. dnmouse. org/broadcom. html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale
Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
yum remove b43-fwcutter yum install broadcom-wl kmod-wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: i tryed, it says: Error: b43 conflicts with broacom-wl Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.55 A: Ivan Dell'Oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this (as root): yum install broadcom-wl kmod-wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: RPM Fusion is enabled (checked) i tryed your command...now i can see in systemadministrationnetwork the wlan0 but i cannot connect to my wireless network... Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.15 A: Ivan Dell'Oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe. conf' Do you have RPM Fusion repositories enabled? 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: Yes, i use dual boot but on win it works, i restart and F11 turn off the wireless hardware...how can i swich it on one time for ever? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 28/06/2009 1.12 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you use dual-boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39; #39; #39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39; #39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http: //fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http: //dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www. dnmouse. org/broadcom. html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2
Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
perfect man!now is working...thank's a lot! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 15.11 A: Ivan Dell'Oroz3...@libero. it Cc: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 yum remove b43-fwcutter yum install broadcom-wl kmod-wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: i tryed, it says: Error: b43 conflicts with broacom-wl Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.55 A: Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this (as root): yum install broadcom-wl kmod-wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: RPM Fusion is enabled (checked) i tryed your command...now i can see in systemadministrationnetwork the wlan0 but i cannot connect to my wireless network... Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.15 A: Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe. conf' Do you have RPM Fusion repositories enabled? 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: Yes, i use dual boot but on win it works, i restart and F11 turn off the wireless hardware...how can i swich it on one time for ever? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 28/06/2009 1.12 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you use dual-boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39; #39; #39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39; #39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http: //fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver. 21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http: //dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2. 4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06
Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
:D 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: perfect man!now is working...thank's a lot! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 15.11 A: Ivan Dell'Oroz3...@libero. it Cc: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 yum remove b43-fwcutter yum install broadcom-wl kmod-wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: i tryed, it says: Error: b43 conflicts with broacom-wl Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.55 A: Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this (as root): yum install broadcom-wl kmod-wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: RPM Fusion is enabled (checked) i tryed your command...now i can see in systemadministrationnetwork the wlan0 but i cannot connect to my wireless network... Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.15 A: Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe. conf' Do you have RPM Fusion repositories enabled? 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: Yes, i use dual boot but on win it works, i restart and F11 turn off the wireless hardware...how can i swich it on one time for ever? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 28/06/2009 1.12 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you use dual-boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39; #39; #39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39; #39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http: //fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver. 21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http: //dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2. 4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot
Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
do you restart to test if the the module is starting automatically? 2009/6/29 Ulissis Gomes Corrêa ulissi...@gmail.com: :D 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: perfect man!now is working...thank's a lot! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 15.11 A: Ivan Dell'Oroz3...@libero. it Cc: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 yum remove b43-fwcutter yum install broadcom-wl kmod-wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: i tryed, it says: Error: b43 conflicts with broacom-wl Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.55 A: Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this (as root): yum install broadcom-wl kmod-wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: RPM Fusion is enabled (checked) i tryed your command...now i can see in systemadministrationnetwork the wlan0 but i cannot connect to my wireless network... Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.15 A: Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe. conf' Do you have RPM Fusion repositories enabled? 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: Yes, i use dual boot but on win it works, i restart and F11 turn off the wireless hardware...how can i swich it on one time for ever? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 28/06/2009 1.12 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you use dual-boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39; #39; #39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39; #39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http: //fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver. 21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http: //dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2. 4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero
R: Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
yes, i had to restart...after installation wasn't working..afther reboot works! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 15.35 A: Ivan Dell'Oroz3...@libero.it Cc: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39; #39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you restart to test if the the module is starting automatically? 2009/6/29 Ulissis Gomes Corrêa ulissi...@gmail.com: :D 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: perfect man!now is working...thank's a lot! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 15.11 A: Ivan Dell'Oroz3...@libero. it Cc: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 yum remove b43-fwcutter yum install broadcom-wl kmod-wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: i tryed, it says: Error: b43 conflicts with broacom-wl Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.55 A: Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this (as root): yum install broadcom-wl kmod- wl 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: RPM Fusion is enabled (checked) i tryed your command...now i can see in systemadministrationnetwork the wlan0 but i cannot connect to my wireless network... Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 29/06/2009 14.15 A: Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try this: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe. conf' Do you have RPM Fusion repositories enabled? 2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro z3...@libero.it: Yes, i use dual boot but on win it works, i restart and F11 turn off the wireless hardware...how can i swich it on one time for ever? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 28/06/2009 1.12 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you use dual-boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39; #39; #39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39; #39; s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http: //fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver. 21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http: //dnmouse. org/b43- 3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do
Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
yes i use dual boot with xp...it works under win and works the button to turn on/off Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 28/06/2009 1.12 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 do you use dual- boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39; #39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http://fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http://dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero. it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www. dnmouse. org/broadcom. html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee. org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux- hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just
(no subject)
Hi there people i'm a student of Informatic Engineering and i am eager to help and learn more about developing infrastructure of ower operating system. I Use Linux for about 10 years and i'm not with the idea of changing. By the oposite i pretend continue using it and help in what comes to be necessary for its evaluation. My habilitacions in programing languages are c, and c++. I'm from Portugal and i have 30 years old. In the moment the school vacation arrives and i got nothing to do so I'm asking for some project something light for start, or to colaborate with a team. I'm afford to start. With all my regards Sérgio Araújo ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject.org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http://dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11.noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www.dnmouse. org/broadcom.html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee.org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux- hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if you already had it working in another distro, then that's probably not the issue. Personally, I've only tried a few different wireless devices with linux, but the only one that I could get to work was the Linksys WUSB54GC USB Wireless network adapter, but I think any device that uses Ralink rt73 chipset has good support in Linux. Specifically, the drivers for this chipset are part of the Fedora distro: I just recently installed F11 and didn't have to do anything special, the USB wireless adapter just worked. Info on what other chipsets/devices currently enjoy Linux support are avaiable at this page: http://linux- wless.passys. nl/query_hostif.php Hope that helps some. -Brian -- Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption: Key Id: 0x3AA70848 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat. com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject. org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Ulissis Gomes Corrêa Brazilian Fedora Ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ulissisgc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https: //www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http: //fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Ulissis Gomes Corrêa Brazilian Fedora Ambassador http://fedoraproject. org/wiki/User:Ulissisgc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
Try with one of these methods: http://fedoraguide.info/index.php?title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject.org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http://dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11.noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www.dnmouse. org/broadcom.html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee.org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux- hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if you already had it working in another distro, then that's probably not the issue. Personally, I've only tried a few different wireless devices with linux, but the only one that I could get to work was the Linksys WUSB54GC USB Wireless network adapter, but I think any device that uses Ralink rt73 chipset has good support in Linux. Specifically, the drivers for this chipset are part of the Fedora distro: I just recently installed F11 and didn't have to do anything special, the USB wireless adapter just worked. Info on what other chipsets/devices currently enjoy Linux support are avaiable at this page: http://linux- wless.passys. nl/query_hostif.php Hope that helps some. -Brian -- Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption: Key Id: 0x3AA70848 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat. com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject. org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Ulissis Gomes Corrêa Brazilian Fedora Ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ulissisgc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https: //www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http: //fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Ulissis Gomes Corrêa Brazilian Fedora Ambassador http://fedoraproject. org/wiki/User:Ulissisgc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Ulissis Gomes Corrêa Brazilian Fedora Ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ulissisgc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate
Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http://fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject.org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http://dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www. dnmouse. org/broadcom.html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee. org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux- hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if you already had it working in another distro, then that's probably not the issue. Personally, I've only tried a few different wireless devices with linux, but the only one that I could get to work was the Linksys WUSB54GC USB Wireless network adapter, but I think any device that uses Ralink rt73 chipset has good support in Linux. Specifically, the drivers for this chipset are part of the Fedora distro: I just recently installed F11 and didn't have to do anything special, the USB wireless adapter just worked. Info on what other chipsets/devices currently enjoy Linux support are avaiable at this page: http://linux- wless.passys. nl/query_hostif. php Hope that helps some. -Brian -- Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption: Key Id: 0x3AA70848 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat. com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject. org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Ulissis Gomes Corrêa Brazilian Fedora Ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ulissisgc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https: //www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http: //fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Ulissis Gomes Corrêa Brazilian Fedora Ambassador http
Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http://fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject.org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http://dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www. dnmouse. org/broadcom.html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee. org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux- hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if you already had it working in another distro, then that's probably not the issue. Personally, I've only tried a few different wireless devices with linux, but the only one that I could get to work was the Linksys WUSB54GC USB Wireless network adapter, but I think any device that uses Ralink rt73 chipset has good support in Linux. Specifically, the drivers for this chipset are part of the Fedora distro: I just recently installed F11 and didn't have to do anything special, the USB wireless adapter just worked. Info on what other chipsets/devices currently enjoy Linux support are avaiable at this page: http://linux- wless.passys. nl/query_hostif. php Hope that helps some. -Brian -- Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption: Key Id: 0x3AA70848 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat. com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject. org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Ulissis Gomes Corrêa Brazilian Fedora Ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ulissisgc -- fedora
Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http://fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http://dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www. dnmouse. org/broadcom. html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee. org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux- hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if you already had it working in another distro, then that's probably not the issue. Personally, I've only tried a few different wireless devices with linux, but the only one that I could get to work was the Linksys WUSB54GC USB Wireless network adapter, but I think any device that uses Ralink rt73 chipset has good support in Linux. Specifically, the drivers for this chipset are part of the Fedora distro: I just recently installed F11 and didn't have to do anything special, the USB wireless adapter just worked. Info on what other chipsets
Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
do you use dual-boot with Windows? if yes, boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is turned on and working (might be strange but I already saw people who did that and the wi-fi started to work on Linux). 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: the fist command answer: WARNING : Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf , all files belong into /etc/modprobe.d and the second open a new line with where i can write but it does nothing please help me! thank's for the help given to my 'til now! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 21.58 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Have you followed one of the methods of the link? Try su -c '/sbin/modprobe b43' to test if the module is working or you can try: su -c 'echo alias wlan0 b43 /etc/modprobe.conf' to turn on the module on boot. 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: i think that the problem now tha firmware is installed is that the device will not start during the boot. is always switched off and i push the botton to turn it on nothing happen! Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@gmail.com Data: 27/06/2009 20.46 A: ivan dell'oroz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: Re#39;#39;#39;s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Try with one of these methods: http://fedoraguide.info/index.php? title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.21.21.21.29 2009/6/27 ivan dell'oro z3...@libero.it: I've tryied but without any output and the wireless doesn't work like before... what do u suggest me to do? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 16.14 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 In the console type: su - rpm -Uivh http://dnmouse. org/b43-3-4.fc11. noarch.rpm and restart 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero. it: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero. it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http: //www. dnmouse. org/broadcom. html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee. org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux- hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if you already had it working in another distro, then that's probably not the issue. Personally, I've only tried a few different wireless devices with linux, but the only one that I could get to work was the Linksys WUSB54GC USB Wireless network adapter, but I think any device that uses Ralink
(no subject)
Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux-hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if you already had it working in another distro, then that's probably not the issue. Personally, I've only tried a few different wireless devices with linux, but the only one that I could get to work was the Linksys WUSB54GC USB Wireless network adapter, but I think any device that uses Ralink rt73 chipset has good support in Linux. Specifically, the drivers for this chipset are part of the Fedora distro: I just recently installed F11 and didn't have to do anything special, the USB wireless adapter just worked. Info on what other chipsets/devices currently enjoy Linux support are avaiable at this page: http://linux-wless.passys.nl/query_hostif.php Hope that helps some. -Brian -- Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption: Key Id: 0x3AA70848 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject) Wireless Boadcom
On 26/06/09 12:22, z3...@libero.it wrote: http://www.dnmouse.org/broadcom.html Frank -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
On Friday 26 June 2009 12:22:34 z3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan Ivan there are plenty of people to help you, but you must give as much information as possible. There are quite a few Broadcom models. Can you please say which is yours? Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
Brian Mearns wrote: In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux-hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. That does not seem to me to be relevant unless you intend to use vendor-supplied drivers. In my experience this is bound to cause problems sooner or later, unless you have decided you will never update your system. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Timothy Murphygayle...@eircom.net wrote: Brian Mearns wrote: In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux-hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. That does not seem to me to be relevant unless you intend to use vendor-supplied drivers. In my experience this is bound to cause problems sooner or later, unless you have decided you will never update your system. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin [clipped] I didn't specifically mean vendor-supplied drivers, I meant vendor support of the Linux community so that proper drivers can be written. Like HP, for instance, has a pretty good connection to the Linux/Unix community and has apparently been pretty forthcoming with information in support of linux drivers for HP printers. But, as far as I know, the drivers are not actually written by HP. -Brian -- Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption: Key Id: 0x3AA70848 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http://www.dnmouse. org/broadcom.html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee.org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux-hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if you already had it working in another distro, then that's probably not the issue. Personally, I've only tried a few different wireless devices with linux, but the only one that I could get to work was the Linksys WUSB54GC USB Wireless network adapter, but I think any device that uses Ralink rt73 chipset has good support in Linux. Specifically, the drivers for this chipset are part of the Fedora distro: I just recently installed F11 and didn't have to do anything special, the USB wireless adapter just worked. Info on what other chipsets/devices currently enjoy Linux support are avaiable at this page: http://linux-wless.passys.nl/query_hostif.php Hope that helps some. -Brian -- Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption: Key Id: 0x3AA70848 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http://www.dnmouse. org/broadcom.html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee.org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux-hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if you already had it working in another distro, then that's probably not the issue. Personally, I've only tried a few different wireless devices with linux, but the only one that I could get to work was the Linksys WUSB54GC USB Wireless network adapter, but I think any device that uses Ralink rt73 chipset has good support in Linux. Specifically, the drivers for this chipset are part of the Fedora distro: I just recently installed F11 and didn't have to do anything special, the USB wireless adapter just worked. Info on what other chipsets/devices currently enjoy Linux support are avaiable at this page: http://linux- wless.passys.nl/query_hostif.php Hope that helps some. -Brian -- Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption: Key Id: 0x3AA70848 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat. com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject. org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Ulissis Gomes Corrêa Brazilian Fedora Ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ulissisgc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re'''s [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
Ok Brian i'm very sorry! so i will try that command and i will let u know if works! thank's to everybody! ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee.org Data: 26/06/2009 16.12 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 Please try to avoid introducing extra Re:'s into the subject line when you respond, it screws up people's thread trackers in their mail clients. Thanks, -Brian On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:07 AM, z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it wrote: so i think that my bcm has to work but somebody could tell me what i have to do to make it working? Messaggio originale Da: ulissi...@fedoraproject. org Data: 26/06/2009 15.57 A: z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora-l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 2.4 Ghz this case is the transmission frequency that the wireless signal work with. 2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http://www. dnmouse. org/broadcom.html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan Messaggio originale Da: bmea...@ieee.org Data: 26/06/2009 14.24 A: z3...@libero.itz3...@libero.it, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.fedora- l...@redhat. com Ogg: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero. itz3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a problem with the wireless hardware (Broadcom 802.11). Are just some months that i'm using linux and i'm not so good at it. thank's to everybody! ivan [clipped] In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a pretty high demand area). As with most linux- hardware issues, the real problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel. But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if you already had it working in another distro, then that's probably not the issue. Personally, I've only tried a few different wireless devices with linux, but the only one that I could get to work was the Linksys WUSB54GC USB Wireless network adapter, but I think any device that uses Ralink rt73 chipset has good support in Linux. Specifically, the drivers for this chipset are part of the Fedora distro: I just recently installed F11 and didn't have to do anything special, the USB wireless adapter just worked. Info on what other chipsets/devices currently enjoy Linux support are avaiable at this page: http://linux- wless.passys. nl/query_hostif.php Hope that helps some. -Brian -- Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption: Key Id: 0x3AA70848 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat. com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject. org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Ulissis Gomes Corrêa Brazilian Fedora Ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ulissisgc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https: //www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http: //fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption: Key Id: 0x3AA70848 Available from: http://keys.gnupg.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
OT: you need to check your mailer. None of your replies are being correctly threaded, meaning your mailer is not processing the In-Reply-To header. This means that this thread is all over the place, making it harder to follow (even aside from the wierd Subject line). poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 08:24:19 -0400, Brian Mearns bmea...@ieee.org wrote: But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if you already had it working in another distro, then that's probably not the issue. Personally, I've only tried a few different wireless Broadcom is bad because not only do they not help with the kernel drivers, they have restrictions on distribution of the firmware that drivers need to load into the device. This is from the linux wireless project web page for b43: The Broadcom wireless chip needs software, called firmware, that runs on the wireless chip itself during operation. This firmware is copyrighted by Broadcom and it must be extracted from Broadcom's proprietary drivers. To get such firmware on your system, you must download the driver from a legal distribution point, as noted below. Then you must extract the firmware from that Broadcom driver by using b43-fwcutter (or bcm43xx-fwcutter) and install it in the special directory for firmware - usually /lib/firmware. Please note that the firmware from the binary drivers is Copyrighted by Broadcom Corporation and must not be redistributed. There is some free, reverse engineered, firmware for broadcom chips, but I think it is still considered experimental. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
My replies? or Z3N58 replies? 2009/6/26 Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com: OT: you need to check your mailer. None of your replies are being correctly threaded, meaning your mailer is not processing the In-Reply-To header. This means that this thread is all over the place, making it harder to follow (even aside from the wierd Subject line). poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- Ulissis Gomes Corrêa Brazilian Fedora Ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ulissisgc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:51 -0300, Ulissis Gomes Corrêa wrote: My replies? or Z3N58 replies? Z3N58, sorry. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 09:47 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Broadcom is bad because not only do they not help with the kernel drivers, they have restrictions on distribution of the firmware that drivers need to load into the device. This is from the linux wireless project web page for b43: The Broadcom wireless chip needs software, called firmware, that runs on the wireless chip itself during operation. This firmware is copyrighted by Broadcom and it must be extracted from Broadcom's proprietary drivers. To get such firmware on your system, you must download the driver from a legal distribution point, as noted below. Then you must extract the firmware from that Broadcom driver by using b43-fwcutter (or bcm43xx-fwcutter) and install it in the special directory for firmware - usually /lib/firmware. Please note that the firmware from the binary drivers is Copyrighted by Broadcom Corporation and must not be redistributed. The other shoe dropping here: Does this mean that sites such as easylife and dnmouse could potentially (albeit inadvertently) be illegally re-distributing Broadcom firmware if they are making it available as an RPM? It would seem to me that an RPM could automate the download and install on F11 from a legal distribution point without actually carrying the firmware. Thoughts or ideas on how this could happen? Like it or not, we will have to deal with systems using Broadcom hardware one way or another... -- “If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed.” --Mark Twain -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
On Friday 26 June 2009 14:53:07 z3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http://www.dnmouse. org/broadcom.html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan OK - the chipset, which is the important bit, is BCM4312 revision 01. If you put linux BCM4312 into google or any other search engine you will find lots of answers. At a quick look it seems to be saying that there is not a built-in driver for this, and you may need to use ndiswrapper with the windows driver. I did see more than one site with explanations of how to do this. (Of course as newer kernels are released this may change, and may have already changed.) I suggest that you look through the list that the search returns for an entry in your own language that gives a good explanation. If you can't see one, find a promising one in another language then try google-translate - it won't give a perect translation but usually it's good enough to understand. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
Anne Wilson wrote: On Friday 26 June 2009 14:53:07 z3...@libero.it wrote: Hi, i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i forgot! so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) i don't know lther cmd to know wich version of broadcom i have. reading tha page http://www.dnmouse. org/broadcom.html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- 42 2,1 GHz, cache L2 = 512 KB) will works! thank's everybody for the answers... ivan OK - the chipset, which is the important bit, is BCM4312 revision 01. If you put linux BCM4312 into google or any other search engine you will find lots of answers. At a quick look it seems to be saying that there is not a built-in driver for this, and you may need to use ndiswrapper with the windows driver. I did see more than one site with explanations of how to do this. (Of course as newer kernels are released this may change, and may have already changed.) I suggest that you look through the list that the search returns for an entry in your own language that gives a good explanation. If you can't see one, find a promising one in another language then try google-translate - it won't give a perect translation but usually it's good enough to understand. Depending on whether you want to be perfectly open source politically correct or just have a working system with no illegal software, you could try the kmod-wl driver from rpmfusion. Works for me, I'm happy to say, and I didn't have to buy new hardware. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:21:14 -0600 Christopher A. Williams wrote: It would seem to me that an RPM could automate the download and install on F11 from a legal distribution point without actually carrying the firmware. msttcorefonts has done something similar to that for quite a while. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
On Friday 26 June 2009 17:51:23 Bill Davidsen wrote: Depending on whether you want to be perfectly open source politically correct or just have a working system with no illegal software, you could try the kmod-wl driver from rpmfusion. Works for me, I'm happy to say, and I didn't have to buy new hardware. Bill I doubt if he even knows how to install the rpmfusion repo. Do you have time to walk him through this, on or off list? He sounds as though he'd appreciate it. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 15:53:07 +0200, z3...@libero.it z3...@libero.it wrote: org/broadcom.html i can understand that is supported but afther is written only tha 2.4 Ghz part and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™ SI- That's the radio frequency used not the clock rate of your cpu. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
On 06/21/2009 12:51 AM, Armin Moradi wrote: On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 7:05 PM, dn...@yahoo.com mailto:dn...@yahoo.com wrote: Message: 8 Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:42:14 -0400 From: Mail Lists li...@sapience.com mailto:li...@sapience.com Subject: Re: Baffled by a Cable Modem To: Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 4a3cf546.6030...@sapience.com mailto:4a3cf546.6030...@sapience.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 06/20/2009 10:38 AM, Jim wrote: What your forgetting is the mac# from a previous device, Computer ,etc, some cable modems will retain that mac # and not connect to any new devices until you clear the old one. I thought he had connectivity - just not to all hosts - so this sounds like a red herring. I have been trying to follow this line of trouble shooting, but it think it is above my pay grade. But I think you are right about the red-herring. I can ping any one I have tried. I think that means my DHCP and DNS are OK. Could it be DNS problem? ... firefox caches dns ... so some cached hosts may work That looks promising. If firefox is cacheing a bad dns, then maybe everything else would work OK except firefox. Maybe, if it cached a google dns, it would work with the google stuff, which it does, but not other sites. However, I also tried dillo, with the same unable to load result. I had an idea of how to check this. I booted the problem computer with fc9 Live-CD. (I think that gives me all clean configuration files) and I had the same problem and gmail still worked. I have connected the ethernet cable out of the modem to my old computer ( fc8). I tried to boot, which went OK, except the modem wasn't found. I then powered down the modem and the computer, then powered them both up and booted. It seems to work fine. (Maybe this computer works on saturdays) To me, it acts like hardware. Next I think I will try putting in an old NIC that I have and see what happens. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines Could someone put a sane subject on this please? (no subject) doesn't make any sense. -- Armin Moradi If he is having problems with reaching some websites and not others it is a IPV6 DNS problem in Firefox , 1. Do a about:config in Firefox URL and where it says filter at top put this line network.dns.disableIPv6 user set boolean true W/O quotes. And double check down in body that it is entered correctly. 2. In /etc make a file dhclient-eth0.conf and put in line, prepend domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1; W/o quotes If you have a eth1 or wlan0 , you will have to make a file for them, just change the eth0 to eth1, wlan0, Etc. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
Message: 8 Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:42:14 -0400 From: Mail Lists li...@sapience.com Subject: Re: Baffled by a Cable Modem To: Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 4a3cf546.6030...@sapience.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 06/20/2009 10:38 AM, Jim wrote: What your forgetting is the mac# from a previous device, Computer ,etc, some cable modems will retain that mac # and not connect to any new devices until you clear the old one. I thought he had connectivity - just not to all hosts - so this sounds like a red herring. I have been trying to follow this line of trouble shooting, but it think it is above my pay grade. But I think you are right about the red-herring. I can ping any one I have tried. I think that means my DHCP and DNS are OK. Could it be DNS problem? ... firefox caches dns ... so some cached hosts may work That looks promising. If firefox is cacheing a bad dns, then maybe everything else would work OK except firefox. Maybe, if it cached a google dns, it would work with the google stuff, which it does, but not other sites. However, I also tried dillo, with the same unable to load result. I had an idea of how to check this. I booted the problem computer with fc9 Live-CD. (I think that gives me all clean configuration files) and I had the same problem and gmail still worked. I have connected the ethernet cable out of the modem to my old computer ( fc8). I tried to boot, which went OK, except the modem wasn't found. I then powered down the modem and the computer, then powered them both up and booted. It seems to work fine. (Maybe this computer works on saturdays) To me, it acts like hardware. Next I think I will try putting in an old NIC that I have and see what happens. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
Message: 8 Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:42:14 -0400 From: Mail Lists li...@sapience.com Subject: Re: Baffled by a Cable Modem To: Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 4a3cf546.6030...@sapience.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 06/20/2009 10:38 AM, Jim wrote: What your forgetting is the mac# from a previous device, Computer ,etc, some cable modems will retain that mac # and not connect to any new devices until you clear the old one. I thought he had connectivity - just not to all hosts - so this sounds like a red herring. I have been trying to follow this line of trouble shooting, but it think it is above my pay grade. But I think you are right about the red-herring. I can ping any one I have tried. I think that means my DHCP and DNS are OK. Could it be DNS problem? ... firefox caches dns ... so some cached hosts may work That looks promising. If firefox is cacheing a bad dns, then maybe everything else would work OK except firefox. Maybe, if it cached a google dns, it would work with the google stuff, which it does, but not other sites. However, I also tried dillo, with the same unable to load result. I had an idea of how to check this. I booted the problem computer with fc9 Live-CD. (I think that gives me all clean configuration files) and I had the same problem and gmail still worked. I have connected the ethernet cable out of the modem to my old computer ( fc8). I tried to boot, which went OK, except the modem wasn't found. I then powered down the modem and the computer, then powered them both up and booted. It seems to work fine. (Maybe this computer works on saturdays) To me, it acts like hardware. Next I think I will try putting in an old NIC that I have and see what happens. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 7:05 PM, dn...@yahoo.com wrote: Message: 8 Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:42:14 -0400 From: Mail Lists li...@sapience.com Subject: Re: Baffled by a Cable Modem To: Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 4a3cf546.6030...@sapience.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 06/20/2009 10:38 AM, Jim wrote: What your forgetting is the mac# from a previous device, Computer ,etc, some cable modems will retain that mac # and not connect to any new devices until you clear the old one. I thought he had connectivity - just not to all hosts - so this sounds like a red herring. I have been trying to follow this line of trouble shooting, but it think it is above my pay grade. But I think you are right about the red-herring. I can ping any one I have tried. I think that means my DHCP and DNS are OK. Could it be DNS problem? ... firefox caches dns ... so some cached hosts may work That looks promising. If firefox is cacheing a bad dns, then maybe everything else would work OK except firefox. Maybe, if it cached a google dns, it would work with the google stuff, which it does, but not other sites. However, I also tried dillo, with the same unable to load result. I had an idea of how to check this. I booted the problem computer with fc9 Live-CD. (I think that gives me all clean configuration files) and I had the same problem and gmail still worked. I have connected the ethernet cable out of the modem to my old computer ( fc8). I tried to boot, which went OK, except the modem wasn't found. I then powered down the modem and the computer, then powered them both up and booted. It seems to work fine. (Maybe this computer works on saturdays) To me, it acts like hardware. Next I think I will try putting in an old NIC that I have and see what happens. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines Could someone put a sane subject on this please? (no subject) doesn't make any sense. -- Armin Moradi -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
At approx. 5P.M.C on 6-16-09 I tried to download the new distro but, every link gets me:500 Internal Server Error -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
Re: (no subject)
On 2009-05-17 10:38:07 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: The httpd-2.2.11-8.fc11 package no longer contains some of the caching modules used in the httpd.conf.in file for the fedora-web module. I'm not sure how useful this patch is since we probably have participants on older systems, but here it is anyway. Applied and pushed, thanks! Ricky pgpu03mOyumwC.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
Problem installing with GUI (subject edited for relevance)
2009/5/4 Rob Campbell robm...@gmail.com: Hope I do this right. I have tried to install Fedora 10 on my system and get white screen My system, ATI 4870X2 Intel Core i7 6 Gig DDR3 1600 Dual 750 Gig WD Black Drives (1) Blu Ray (2) DVDRW 850 Watt Corsair Nice rig. :) I have been trying for about a month now to get any Linux with the NON Free ATI Drivers installed. I want to try out the current KDE 4.2 and to get all the goodies you need 3D enabled of course. My question is how to get Fedora installed and once installed will the 3 D drivers install? You are up for a rocky ride ahead. But once its all done, its pretty rewarding. Your graphics chip is not supported by any of the free drivers that ships with fedora. I have the little brother of that card, HD4870 (single GPU). The way to get things installed is to pass the argument linux text (without the quotes) before the DVD boots. This will take you to a text mode install. Don't get scared, its just console graphics, you would need to know any command line tools to proceed. Now once you are done with that, comes the more difficult part of getting the GUI working. If you have a wired connection you are in luck. (hopefully) All you have to do is use rpm / yum to install the rpmfusion-free and rpmfusion-nonfree repositories. Then use yum to install these packages. $rpm -qa \*fglrx\*|sort akmod-fglrx-9.3-1.fc10.x86_64 kmod-fglrx-2.6.27.15-170.2.24.fc10.x86_64-9.2-2.fc10.x86_64 kmod-fglrx-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64-9.2-2.fc10.1.x86_64 kmod-fglrx-2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64-9.3-1.fc10.x86_64 kmod-fglrx-9.3-1.fc10.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-2.fc10.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-devel-9.3-2.fc10.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-libs-9.3-2.fc10.x86_64 I am expressing my doubt here because F10 uses NetworkManager as default to manage the network and it doesn't work from text mode. I am not at ease with NetworkManager so someone else will have to help here. Now if you use wireless like me, then your work becomes much more difficult. You have to download these rpms (and some others) manually from the rpm fusion repo and the fedora repo, use a USB drive or CD to transfer it and install using $rpm -ivh /path/to/directory/with/the/rpms/* Here is the list of the extra rpms you might need. (might not be exhaustive) $ rpm -qa \*kmod\* |grep -v fglrx|sort akmods-0.3.3-2.fc10.noarch kmodtool-1-15.fc10.noarch $rpm -qa \*display\* |grep -v fglrx|sort livna-config-display-0.0.22-1.fc10.noarch system-config-display-1.1.1-1.fc10.noarch (all except the livna-config-display package are in the fedora repos) Now once you have done all this, you need to change the default runlevel to runlevel 5 if you don't want to boot to runlevel 3 every time you boot. Edit your /etc/inittab to look like this, (Ignore the lines with # 's in them. They are just comments. Read them if you want to learn. Comments are so awesome, teaches you so much :) ) id:5:initdefault: Now reboot and install whatever you want to and enjoy F10. I don't use compiz so can't say much about that. But just for fun I sometimes turn on the cube, and it is usually stable enough and fun. PS: you might want to install the yum plugin called version lock. yum-versionlock-1.1.19-1.fc10.noarch It is very helpful to test a new driver release in a controlled environment before you move to it for good. I would also suggest keeping all the rpms for the stable versions around on your disk, just in case. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
I can't play mp3 in F10 the player say that no have MPEG-1 Layer (mp3) . How I'm solve this? Regards Caio -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/02/2009 12:59 PM, cibertazzi2001 wrote: I can't play mp3 in F10 the player say that no have MPEG-1 Layer (mp3) . How I'm solve this? Regards Caio Add the RPMFUSION repositories then look for packages for your music player. http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration - -- Steve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkn8vJgACgkQeERILVgMyvDA/QCfVpKzrfoULdZsbbw6A+Rjfu+k kecAn1PlngeGxJoArTIzSLJHA/C6tiT6 =WTY7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
cibertazzi2001 wrote: I can't play mp3 in F10 the player say that no have MPEG-1 Layer (mp3) . Which player? (The package to add depends on which player you're using.) Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
Amarok and audacious player both ask MPEG-1 layer mp3 Kevin Kofler wrote: cibertazzi2001 wrote: I can't play mp3 in F10 the player say that no have MPEG-1 Layer (mp3) . Which player? (The package to add depends on which player you're using.) Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
cibertazzi2001 wrote: Amarok and audacious player both ask MPEG-1 layer mp3 Amarok needs xine-lib-extras-freeworld, Audacious needs audacious-plugins-freeworld-mp3 (or the whole audacious-plugins-freeworld metapackage if you also want other codecs). You can find both in the RPM Fusion repository (in the free (as in speech) section). Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
(no subject)
Dear Mr/Mrs/Miss, I'm Yadhavsingh Jaddoo from Mauritius Island and go to a well known a school, called SSS PHOENIX, in my country. I recently got the Linux Ubuntu and i was very satisfied with it.Many friends of mine wanted to have it and i did copies for them on other disks. I never thought that you were really going to deliver it. Thank you very much. I want to become a distributor for my country, as this is the only way I can thank you for giving me Ubuntu and i want to distribute Linux all over Mauritius. I don't know how to become a local distributor for my country, please help me, I should be grateful to you. As my school is specialized in technical subjects such as Graphic designing many students use Linux for designing. Your's faithfullyYadhavsingh JaddooN12, Alles Brillant, Vacoas, MauritiusTel : +230 7453001 _ Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=createwx_url=/friends.aspxmkt=en-us-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
Fwd: (no subject)
Didn't reply all. Sorry. Darren L. VanBuren = http://oks.tumblr.com/ -- Forwarded message -- From: Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 16:51 Subject: Re: (no subject) To: Raj JADDOO rajjad...@hotmail.com We're not affiliated with the development or distribution of Ubuntu. We're the Fedora Project! You would also want to ask the Ambassadors if you wanted CDs of Fedora. You could download a copy of Fedora at our website, http://fedoraproject.org/ Thanks! Darren L. VanBuren = http://oks.tumblr.com/ On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:43, Raj JADDOO rajjad...@hotmail.com wrote: Dear Mr/Mrs/Miss, I'm Yadhavsingh Jaddoo from Mauritius Island and go to a well known a school, called SSS PHOENIX, in my country. I recently got the Linux Ubuntu and i was very satisfied with it.Many friends of mine wanted to have it and i did copies for them on other disks. I never thought that you were really going to deliver it. Thank you very much. I want to become a distributor for my country, as this is the only way I can thank you for giving me Ubuntu and i want to distribute Linux all over Mauritius. I don't know how to become a local distributor for my country, please help me, I should be grateful to you. As my school is specialized in technical subjects such as Graphic designing many students use Linux for designing. Your's faithfully Yadhavsingh Jaddoo N12, Alles Brillant, Vacoas, Mauritius Tel : +230 7453001 Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! Try it! -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
Re: (no subject)
2009/4/14 g gel...@bellsouth.net: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 22:44 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote: That's interesting Patrick, but I'm very keen to learn how Capitals are working very well with your Asus 1000HE netbook with F10, as it hasn't made an outing in this thread yet. What? This was an attempt at a joke based on your three recent threads that all contain mention of your new toy. Sorry, i'll try harder in future. H E S A I D , H O W A R E C A P I T A L S W O R K I N G O N Y O U R A S U S 1 0 0 0 H E D I D Y O U R E Y E S G O D E A F O N Y O U ? This was a much funnier post. I spat my morning coffee out over this Asus EeePC 701G with Ubuntu 9.04 because of this. -- Sam -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 07:23 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote: This was an attempt at a joke based on your three recent threads that all contain mention of your new toy. Perhaps because they were all questions *about* the new toy? poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
2009/4/14 Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com: On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 07:23 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote: This was an attempt at a joke based on your three recent threads that all contain mention of your new toy. Perhaps because they were all questions *about* the new toy? Ok, it wasn't a very good joke. Lets let it die. -- Sam -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
Sharpe, Sam J wrote: This was a much funnier post. I spat my morning coffee out over this Asus EeePC 701G with Ubuntu 9.04 because of this. glad you enjoyed it. when i read poc's post, it just popped into my head and i could not resist. -- peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ 'fedora faqs' http://www.fedorafaq.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: (no subject)
Sharpe, Sam J wrote: Ok, it wasn't a very good joke. only in that you spat coffee on your asus. :) -- peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ 'fedora faqs' http://www.fedorafaq.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
