Re: Recent updates caused Grub installation to be damaged?

2008-06-15 Thread Brian Morrison
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:52:31 +0800
Tony Frame [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I had the same problem on 2 out of 3 F9 machines recently updated. Fixed
 it by booting from Live CD / USB and running grub and doing the
 following :
 
 root (hd0,0)
 setup (hd0)
 quit  
 
 then re-booting (guess you should check hd0 is your boot device first).
 
 It's also the first time I've had this problem since starting with RH7.

Sounds like someone needs to bugzilla it then, this really shouldn't
happen. Had I been on the road without an F9 DVD to hand it would have
been a lot more difficult to fix.

-- 

Brian Morrison

   Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Recent updates caused Grub installation to be damaged?

2008-06-15 Thread Maurizio Marini
i got the same issue; i was unable in any way to 
chroot /mnt/sysimage
after linux rescue

as fstab and grub.conf have been changed by upgrade; i fixed them mounting disk 
 on an external usb box.
this was my changed fstab:

UUID=cf7cd8e9-13c6-4997-88cf-2b2e917736fb /   ext3
defaults1 1
UUID=22309ffe-0180-41bd-a868-9d5b15660781 /home   ext3
defaults1 2
UUID=c46f0b8e-ea34-47f5-8c7f-57a7f3a5d531 /boot   ext3
defaults1 2
tmpfs   /dev/shmtmpfs   defaults0 0
devpts  /dev/ptsdevpts  gid=5,mode=620  0 0
sysfs   /syssysfs   defaults0 0
proc/proc   procdefaults0 0
UUID=817d341a-8daa-43dd-8c97-2eea4c1f418f swapswap
defaults0 0


i restored it to:
[09:34:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/log ]# cat /etc/fstab
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /   ext3defaults1 1
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol02 /home   ext3defaults1 2
/dev/sda1   /boot   ext3defaults1 2
tmpfs   /dev/shmtmpfs   defaults0 0
devpts  /dev/ptsdevpts  gid=5,mode=620  0 0
sysfs   /syssysfs   defaults0 0
proc/proc   procdefaults0 0
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 swapswapdefaults0 0


this was my grub.conf changed by upgrade:
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE:  You have a /boot partition.  This means that
#  all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
#  root (hd0,0)
#  kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
#  initrd /initrd-version.img
#boot=/dev/sda
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title Fedora (2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 ro 
root=UUID=cf7cd8e9-13c6-4997-88cf-2b2e917736fb rhgb quiet
initrd /initrd-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686.img
title Fedora (2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686 ro 
root=UUID=cf7cd8e9-13c6-4997-88cf-2b2e917736fb rhgb quiet
initrd /initrd-2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686.img


i restored it to:
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE:  You have a /boot partition.  This means that
#  all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
#  root (hd0,0)
#  kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
#  initrd /initrd-version.img
#boot=/dev/sda
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title Fedora (2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 
rhgb quiet
initrd /initrd-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686.img
title Fedora (2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 ro 
root=UUID=cf7cd8e9-13c6-4997-88cf-2b2e917736fb rhgb quiet
initrd /initrd-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686.img
title Fedora (2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686 ro 
root=UUID=cf7cd8e9-13c6-4997-88cf-2b2e917736fb rhgb quiet
initrd /initrd-2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686.img


at last i was able to chroot and then i issued:
grub-install /dev/sda

then i was able to boot my fc9.

i investigated on /var/log/yum.log
to find the *guilt*; 


here it is the excerpt:





Jun 13 13:54:46 Updated: selinux-policy-3.3.1-64.fc9.noarch
Jun 13 13:55:08 Updated: selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-64.fc9.noarch
Jun 13 13:55:35 Updated: selinux-policy-devel-3.3.1-64.fc9.noarch
Jun 13 13:55:40 Updated: logwatch-7.3.6-22.fc9.noarch
Jun 13 13:55:47 Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:57:04 Updated: 1:java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-0.15.b09.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:57:14 Installed: kernel-devel-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686
Jun 13 13:57:23 Updated: nspr-4.7.1-0.9.1.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:57:28 Updated: nss-3.12.0.3-0.9.1.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:57:55 Updated: 1:java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.15.b09.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:57:57 Updated: postgresql-libs-8.3.3-1.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:57:58 Updated: kpartx-0.4.7-15.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:57:59 Updated: device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-15.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:58:00 Updated: 1:java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.15.b09.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:58:02 Updated: nss-tools-3.12.0.3-0.9.1.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:58:31 Installed: kernel-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686
Jun 13 13:58:32 Updated: gstreamer-plugins-farsight-0.12.7-2.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:58:34 Updated: gdb-6.8-10.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:58:35 Updated: nspr-devel-4.7.1-0.9.1.fc9.i386
Jun 13 13:58:36 Updated: 

Re: Recent updates caused Grub installation to be damaged?

2008-06-15 Thread Brian Morrison
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:45:56 +0100
Brian Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:52:31 +0800
 Tony Frame [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I had the same problem on 2 out of 3 F9 machines recently updated. Fixed
  it by booting from Live CD / USB and running grub and doing the
  following :
  
  root (hd0,0)
  setup (hd0)
  quit  
  
  then re-booting (guess you should check hd0 is your boot device first).
  
  It's also the first time I've had this problem since starting with RH7.
 
 Sounds like someone needs to bugzilla it then, this really shouldn't
 happen. Had I been on the road without an F9 DVD to hand it would have
 been a lot more difficult to fix.
 

Seems there is already a bug open about this sort of behaviour:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450143

-- 

Brian Morrison

   Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Recent updates caused Grub installation to be damaged?

2008-06-15 Thread Maurizio Marini
On Sunday 15 June 2008, Brian Morrison wrote:

  It's also the first time I've had this problem since starting with RH7.
yes. it is
maybe the first time for every distro

 Sounds like someone needs to bugzilla it then, this really shouldn't
 happen. Had I been on the road without an F9 DVD to hand it would have
 been a lot more difficult to fix.

we should advise every other fc9 user on this issue, but i dunno how...
posting on a widely read mlist, like bugtraq, maybe
-m
 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Recent updates caused Grub installation to be damaged?

2008-06-15 Thread Brian Morrison
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:46:14 +0200
Maurizio Marini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 i got the same issue; i was unable in any way to 
 chroot /mnt/sysimage
 after linux rescue
 
 as fstab and grub.conf have been changed by upgrade; i fixed them mounting 
 disk  on an external usb box.
 this was my changed fstab:
 
 UUID=cf7cd8e9-13c6-4997-88cf-2b2e917736fb /   ext3
 defaults1 1
 UUID=22309ffe-0180-41bd-a868-9d5b15660781 /home   ext3
 defaults1 2
 UUID=c46f0b8e-ea34-47f5-8c7f-57a7f3a5d531 /boot   ext3
 defaults1 2
 tmpfs   /dev/shmtmpfs   defaults0 0
 devpts  /dev/ptsdevpts  gid=5,mode=620  0 0
 sysfs   /syssysfs   defaults0 0
 proc/proc   procdefaults0 0
 UUID=817d341a-8daa-43dd-8c97-2eea4c1f418f swapswap
 defaults0 0
 
 
 i restored it to:
 [09:34:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/log ]# cat /etc/fstab
 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /   ext3defaults1 1
 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol02 /home   ext3defaults1 2
 /dev/sda1   /boot   ext3defaults1 2
 tmpfs   /dev/shmtmpfs   defaults0 0
 devpts  /dev/ptsdevpts  gid=5,mode=620  0 0
 sysfs   /syssysfs   defaults0 0
 proc/proc   procdefaults0 0
 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 swapswapdefaults0 0
 
 
 this was my grub.conf changed by upgrade:
 # grub.conf generated by anaconda
 #
 # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
 # NOTICE:  You have a /boot partition.  This means that
 #  all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
 #  root (hd0,0)
 #  kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
 #  initrd /initrd-version.img
 #boot=/dev/sda
 default=0
 timeout=5
 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
 hiddenmenu
 title Fedora (2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686)
 root (hd0,0)
 kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 ro 
 root=UUID=cf7cd8e9-13c6-4997-88cf-2b2e917736fb rhgb quiet
 initrd /initrd-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686.img
 title Fedora (2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686)
 root (hd0,0)
 kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686 ro 
 root=UUID=cf7cd8e9-13c6-4997-88cf-2b2e917736fb rhgb quiet
 initrd /initrd-2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686.img
 
 
 i restored it to:
 # grub.conf generated by anaconda
 #
 # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
 # NOTICE:  You have a /boot partition.  This means that
 #  all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
 #  root (hd0,0)
 #  kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
 #  initrd /initrd-version.img
 #boot=/dev/sda
 default=0
 timeout=5
 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
 hiddenmenu
 title Fedora (2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686)
 root (hd0,0)
 kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 
 rhgb quiet
 initrd /initrd-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686.img
 title Fedora (2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686)
 root (hd0,0)
 kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 ro 
 root=UUID=cf7cd8e9-13c6-4997-88cf-2b2e917736fb rhgb quiet
 initrd /initrd-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686.img
 title Fedora (2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686)
 root (hd0,0)
 kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686 ro 
 root=UUID=cf7cd8e9-13c6-4997-88cf-2b2e917736fb rhgb quiet
 initrd /initrd-2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686.img
 
 
 at last i was able to chroot and then i issued:
 grub-install /dev/sda
 
 then i was able to boot my fc9.
 
 i investigated on /var/log/yum.log
 to find the *guilt*; 
 
 
 here it is the excerpt:
 
 
 
 
 
 Jun 13 13:54:46 Updated: selinux-policy-3.3.1-64.fc9.noarch
 Jun 13 13:55:08 Updated: selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-64.fc9.noarch
 Jun 13 13:55:35 Updated: selinux-policy-devel-3.3.1-64.fc9.noarch
 Jun 13 13:55:40 Updated: logwatch-7.3.6-22.fc9.noarch
 Jun 13 13:55:47 Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i386
 Jun 13 13:57:04 Updated: 
 1:java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-0.15.b09.fc9.i386
 Jun 13 13:57:14 Installed: kernel-devel-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686
 Jun 13 13:57:23 Updated: nspr-4.7.1-0.9.1.fc9.i386
 Jun 13 13:57:28 Updated: nss-3.12.0.3-0.9.1.fc9.i386
 Jun 13 13:57:55 Updated: 1:java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.15.b09.fc9.i386
 Jun 13 13:57:57 Updated: postgresql-libs-8.3.3-1.fc9.i386
 Jun 13 13:57:58 Updated: kpartx-0.4.7-15.fc9.i386
 Jun 13 13:57:59 Updated: device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-15.fc9.i386
 Jun 13 13:58:00 Updated: 1:java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.15.b09.fc9.i386
 Jun 13 13:58:02 Updated: nss-tools-3.12.0.3-0.9.1.fc9.i386
 Jun 13 13:58:31 Installed: kernel-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686
 Jun 

Recent updates caused Grub installation to be damaged?

2008-06-14 Thread Brian Morrison
I updated this morning for the new kernel plus another 30 or so updates.

After rebooting, I got a screen that read just GRUB, then nothing.

Initially I thought that the device.map file might have been the
problem, it had an entry for fd0 in it as the first device, then hd0
as /dev/sda. I edited the file to remove the fd0 entry and tried again,
but still the same result. In the end I re-installed grub again and got
the correct stage 1.5 message before the Grub screen came up.

Has anyone else had problems of this nature on updates recently? I
suppose this could have been a glitch but I've never had a boot sector
damaged before in this way in all the time I've been using Redhat and
Fedora, it looks like there was enough left intact to try and boot with
but then grub couldn't find the files needed to continue.

-- 

Brian Morrison

   Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Recent updates caused Grub installation to be damaged?

2008-06-14 Thread Sam Varshavchik

Brian Morrison writes:


I updated this morning for the new kernel plus another 30 or so updates.

After rebooting, I got a screen that read just GRUB, then nothing.

Initially I thought that the device.map file might have been the
problem, it had an entry for fd0 in it as the first device, then hd0
as /dev/sda. I edited the file to remove the fd0 entry and tried again,
but still the same result. In the end I re-installed grub again and got
the correct stage 1.5 message before the Grub screen came up.


Generally, editing device.map is not enough. /sbin/grub-install must be 
invoked to reinitialize the bootloader using the updated device.map file. 
So, your changes to device.map didn't take effect until you reinstalled 
grub.



Has anyone else had problems of this nature on updates recently? I
suppose this could have been a glitch but I've never had a boot sector
damaged before in this way in all the time I've been using Redhat and
Fedora,


Not with the most recent set of updates, but both of my servers that use 
softraid ended up getting a busted grub configuration installed by F9's 
anaconda, when I upgraded from F8.




pgpmM2RUvbtXj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: Recent updates caused Grub installation to be damaged?

2008-06-14 Thread Tony Frame
On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 18:31 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
 Brian Morrison writes:
 
  I updated this morning for the new kernel plus another 30 or so updates.
  
  After rebooting, I got a screen that read just GRUB, then nothing.
  
  Initially I thought that the device.map file might have been the
  problem, it had an entry for fd0 in it as the first device, then hd0
  as /dev/sda. I edited the file to remove the fd0 entry and tried again,
  but still the same result. In the end I re-installed grub again and got
  the correct stage 1.5 message before the Grub screen came up.
 
 Generally, editing device.map is not enough. /sbin/grub-install must be 
 invoked to reinitialize the bootloader using the updated device.map file. 
 So, your changes to device.map didn't take effect until you reinstalled 
 grub.
 
  Has anyone else had problems of this nature on updates recently? I
  suppose this could have been a glitch but I've never had a boot sector
  damaged before in this way in all the time I've been using Redhat and
  Fedora,
 
 Not with the most recent set of updates, but both of my servers that use 
 softraid ended up getting a busted grub configuration installed by F9's 
 anaconda, when I upgraded from F8.
 
 -- 
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

I had the same problem on 2 out of 3 F9 machines recently updated. Fixed
it by booting from Live CD / USB and running grub and doing the
following :

root (hd0,0)
setup (hd0)
quit

then re-booting (guess you should check hd0 is your boot device first).

It's also the first time I've had this problem since starting with RH7.

Apart from updating the kernel to 2.6.25.4-30.fc9.i686, the only other
thing I can recall changing was to install Google Earth (only on the 2
machines that had problems) ... but seems unlikely that would upset the
boot loader.

Tony

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list