Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-02-02 Thread Armin
On Monday 02 February 2009 13:54:00 Robin Laing wrote:
 Craig White wrote:
  On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 09:53 -0500, Kelly Miller wrote:
  On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com
  wrote:

 \SNIP

  the truth is though, that he is not the only one who switched from KDE
  to GNOME. It's about the expectations.

 When I installed F10 on the first machine, I tried Gnome and was so
 frustrated.  I tried to switch to KDE but I couldn't get it to work but
 that was my fault.  I didn't know about the session selector in GDM and
 was trying switch desktop function.

 After playing with Gnome, I found the same frustrations.  Some nice
 improvements over the version in F7 but still reminded me of using MS
 Windows.  No real control to improve the efficiency.

 KDE 4.1 is pretty good.  I am having some weird issues that I don't like
 but I have not had a chance to figure out all the changes.  I hear 4.2
 is so much better than 4.2 so I think I will be really happy.  Of course
 that is after I change the menu back to the classic menu from the Vista
 like menu.

Ok, honestly, I have been trying to find out what do you guys in kick-off that 
is like window$, but I have yet to find out.  I don't see anything to be the 
same except that there are some things and you click on them.

 My daughter prefers Gnome over KDE because KDE makes here think of Macs
 and she has had her fair share of nightmares with Mac's.

that's the first time I'm hearing this.

  I personally agree that I would rather be using the KDE on F10 than
  GNOME but not everyone who disagrees is inherently wrong.
 
  Craig

 I will drink to that.  To each their own.  The person that turned me
 onto KDE now uses Gnome but is thinking of checking it out again when
 4.2 comes out.

KDE 4.2 is already out and I'v been using it for 2 months now (from RC) and 
the final came out last tuesday.  You can get it from kde-redhat repo.

 --
 Robin Laing

-- 
Armin Moradi

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-02-02 Thread Aldo Foot
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Robin Laing robin.la...@drdc-rddc.gc.ca wrote:
..snip...
 My daughter prefers Gnome over KDE because KDE makes here think of Macs and
 she has had her fair share of nightmares with Mac's.

Funny thing. While using KDE 4.1 in F10, I was tweaking settings and
the very first moment I saw the
layout of the System Settings control panel I though Time warp! it
looks like Mac OS X... I did not think there was anything wrong with
that. I found the control panel to be quite functional.

~af

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-02-02 Thread Michael Comperchio

Robin Laing wrote:

Craig White wrote:

On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 09:53 -0500, Kelly Miller wrote:
 


On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com
wrote:

\SNIP


the truth is though, that he is not the only one who switched from KDE
to GNOME. It's about the expectations.

When I installed F10 on the first machine, I tried Gnome and was so 
frustrated.  I tried to switch to KDE but I couldn't get it to work 
but that was my fault.  I didn't know about the session selector in 
GDM and was trying switch desktop function.


After playing with Gnome, I found the same frustrations.  Some nice 
improvements over the version in F7 but still reminded me of using MS 
Windows.  No real control to improve the efficiency.


KDE 4.1 is pretty good.  I am having some weird issues that I don't 
like but I have not had a chance to figure out all the changes.  I 
hear 4.2 is so much better than 4.2 so I think I will be really 
happy.  Of course that is after I change the menu back to the classic 
menu from the Vista like menu.


My daughter prefers Gnome over KDE because KDE makes here think of 
Macs and she has had her fair share of nightmares with Mac's.






I personally agree that I would rather be using the KDE on F10 than
GNOME but not everyone who disagrees is inherently wrong.

Craig




I will drink to that.  To each their own.  The person that turned me 
onto KDE now uses Gnome but is thinking of checking it out again when 
4.2 comes out.



I've went back to GNOME after the third time I had to press the hard 
reset button on the front of the machine. This is *nix, and my memories 
of *nix based OS is from SCO. In the 90's I worked for NASDAQ and their  
(at the time) communications machines ran SCO, we had boxes that had 
up-times measured in years. So, when KDE 4.1 (this is from the 
downloaded F10 DVD I did ... maybe two and a half weeks ago) hung hard 
enough to need to reset button, it was time to switch. I haven't 
rebooted since now if only I could sync with my lifedrive...


Michael
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-02-02 Thread Robin Laing

Armin wrote:

On Monday 02 February 2009 13:54:00 Robin Laing wrote:

Craig White wrote:

On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 09:53 -0500, Kelly Miller wrote:

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com
wrote:

\SNIP



KDE 4.1 is pretty good.  I am having some weird issues that I don't like
but I have not had a chance to figure out all the changes.  I hear 4.2
is so much better than 4.2 so I think I will be really happy.  Of course
that is after I change the menu back to the classic menu from the Vista
like menu.


Ok, honestly, I have been trying to find out what do you guys in kick-off that 
is like window$, but I have yet to find out.  I don't see anything to be the 
same except that there are some things and you click on them.




I find the way the menu is now into multi-levels in KDE to be like my 
experience with Vista and XP without the classic interface.  To many 
clicks/mouse motions to get to where I want to be.


I prefer the classic menu as it drops one more menu.


My daughter prefers Gnome over KDE because KDE makes here think of Macs
and she has had her fair share of nightmares with Mac's.


that's the first time I'm hearing this.



I wouldn't know how similar it is but those are her thoughts.  I will 
try to convert her.  :)



I personally agree that I would rather be using the KDE on F10 than
GNOME but not everyone who disagrees is inherently wrong.

Craig

I will drink to that.  To each their own.  The person that turned me
onto KDE now uses Gnome but is thinking of checking it out again when
4.2 comes out.


KDE 4.2 is already out and I'v been using it for 2 months now (from RC) and 
the final came out last tuesday.  You can get it from kde-redhat repo.




I don't have that repo but I will have to get it.




--
Robin Laing





--
Robin Laing

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-02-02 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:29:32 -0700
Robin Laing wrote:

  Ok, honestly, I have been trying to find out what do you guys in kick-off 
  that 
  is like window$, but I have yet to find out.  I don't see anything to be 
  the 
  same except that there are some things and you click on them.

 
 I find the way the menu is now into multi-levels in KDE to be like my 
 experience with Vista and XP without the classic interface.  To many 
 clicks/mouse motions to get to where I want to be.

I don't know about KDE kick-off, but it is certainly clear that GDM
is desperate to be a clone of the windows login screen and gnome logout
as well, with the annoying window fade to black  white animation (that
takes forever to update when running in an NX session so you have to
wait forever before you can push the damn go ahead and exit already
button :-).

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-02-02 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 14:29 -0700, Robin Laing wrote:
  
 I find the way the menu is now into multi-levels in KDE to be like my 
 experience with Vista and XP without the classic interface.  To many 
 clicks/mouse motions to get to where I want to be.
 
 I prefer the classic menu as it drops one more menu.

as long as you realize that you can merely right click the 'Application
Launcher' widget to 'Switch to Classic Menu Style'

Craig

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-02-02 Thread Robin Laing

Craig White wrote:

On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 09:53 -0500, Kelly Miller wrote:
 


On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com
wrote:

\SNIP


the truth is though, that he is not the only one who switched from KDE
to GNOME. It's about the expectations.

When I installed F10 on the first machine, I tried Gnome and was so 
frustrated.  I tried to switch to KDE but I couldn't get it to work but 
that was my fault.  I didn't know about the session selector in GDM and 
was trying switch desktop function.


After playing with Gnome, I found the same frustrations.  Some nice 
improvements over the version in F7 but still reminded me of using MS 
Windows.  No real control to improve the efficiency.


KDE 4.1 is pretty good.  I am having some weird issues that I don't like 
but I have not had a chance to figure out all the changes.  I hear 4.2 
is so much better than 4.2 so I think I will be really happy.  Of course 
that is after I change the menu back to the classic menu from the Vista 
like menu.


My daughter prefers Gnome over KDE because KDE makes here think of Macs 
and she has had her fair share of nightmares with Mac's.






I personally agree that I would rather be using the KDE on F10 than
GNOME but not everyone who disagrees is inherently wrong.

Craig




I will drink to that.  To each their own.  The person that turned me 
onto KDE now uses Gnome but is thinking of checking it out again when 
4.2 comes out.



--
Robin Laing

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-30 Thread Kelly Miller
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com wrote:

  Followup to let you know what I decided for myself - I have switched
 from KDE to Gnome. I tried, but KDE4 is just not ready today.


Have fun.  I've been with KDE since 3.2, and KDE 4 since 4.0.  Quite
frankly, 4.2 beats the pants off of just about anything I've seen out there
at this point.  It's definitely ready.


   I know I am not the only person who has switched to Gnome. I will
 revisit this in the coming months and perhaps KDE can recover to be the
 functional, configurable, useful desktop it once was.


Are you trying to draw flames or something?  KDE  is functional,
configurable and useful, unless you're so totally tied to the Windows
desktop metaphor that the very concept of something else drives you
absolutely batty.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-30 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 09:53 -0500, Kelly Miller wrote:
  
 
 On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com
 wrote:
   Followup to let you know what I decided for myself - I have
 switched
 from KDE to Gnome. I tried, but KDE4 is just not ready today.
 
 Have fun.  I've been with KDE since 3.2, and KDE 4 since 4.0.  Quite
 frankly, 4.2 beats the pants off of just about anything I've seen out
 there at this point.  It's definitely ready.
 
 
   I know I am not the only person who has switched to Gnome. I
 will
 revisit this in the coming months and perhaps KDE can recover
 to be the
 functional, configurable, useful desktop it once was.
 
 Are you trying to draw flames or something?  KDE  is functional,
 configurable and useful, unless you're so totally tied to the Windows
 desktop metaphor that the very concept of something else drives you
 absolutely batty.

the truth is though, that he is not the only one who switched from KDE
to GNOME. It's about the expectations.

I personally agree that I would rather be using the KDE on F10 than
GNOME but not everyone who disagrees is inherently wrong.

Craig


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-30 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
 On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 09:53 -0500, Kelly Miller wrote:


 On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com
 wrote:
   Followup to let you know what I decided for myself - I have
 switched
 from KDE to Gnome. I tried, but KDE4 is just not ready today.

 Have fun.  I've been with KDE since 3.2, and KDE 4 since 4.0.  Quite
 frankly, 4.2 beats the pants off of just about anything I've seen out
 there at this point.  It's definitely ready.


   I know I am not the only person who has switched to Gnome. I
 will
 revisit this in the coming months and perhaps KDE can recover
 to be the
 functional, configurable, useful desktop it once was.

 Are you trying to draw flames or something?  KDE  is functional,
 configurable and useful, unless you're so totally tied to the Windows
 desktop metaphor that the very concept of something else drives you
 absolutely batty.
 
 the truth is though, that he is not the only one who switched from KDE
 to GNOME. It's about the expectations.

 I personally agree that I would rather be using the KDE on F10 than
 GNOME but not everyone who disagrees is inherently wrong.

 Craig


I guess I should have posted a public announcement back when I
switched from Gnome to KDE.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-30 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:51 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:

 I guess I should have posted a public announcement back when I
 switched from Gnome to KDE.

I thought that was what blogs are for.

Craig

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-30 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
 On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:51 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:

 I guess I should have posted a public announcement back when I
 switched from Gnome to KDE.
 
 I thought that was what blogs are for.

 Craig


This thread suggests otherwise.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-30 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 12:07 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
  On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:51 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
 
  I guess I should have posted a public announcement back when I
  switched from Gnome to KDE.
  
  I thought that was what blogs are for.
 
  Craig
 
 
 This thread suggests otherwise.

Go to dailykos.com and see their dictionary for gbcw...

Always good when done with dramatic flair even if entirely pointless

Craig

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-30 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 30 January 2009 16:47:13 Craig White wrote:
 I personally agree that I would rather be using the KDE on F10 than
 GNOME but not everyone who disagrees is inherently wrong.

Absolutely correct.  However, there is a difference between saying that you 
are much happier with a different desktop, and saying that what you dislike is 
crap.  Personal likes and choices are just that.

Anne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-29 Thread Mail Lists
On 01/28/2009 11:07 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
 Mail Lists wrote:
   - I've been unable to add items to my desktop menu(s)
 
 System - Preferences - Look and Feel - Main Menu
 
 I'm able to add and remove items using this tool.

  I was thinking of Right (or left) Click on Background Menu rather than
the Applications menu on the panel ... i don't see it there - maybe I am
not looking right ..


 
 If you're on F10, you're probably trying too hard.  At least ssh-agent
 functionality is built in to the gnome-keyring-daemon.  You don't have
 to start it yourself.  You probably don't even need to run 'ssh-add';
 you'll be prompted for the passphrase to keys in the default paths when
 ssh tries to use them for the first time (or at login, if you click a
 checkbox).

  Yes thank you - I am aware of that - but the behaviour of that I found
not to my taste - it grabs focus and refuses to let go. I went back to
the standard ssh-agent and openssh askpass and ssh-add.
 

 Thank you for your thoughts ..

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-28 Thread Mail Lists
On 12/21/2008 02:05 PM, Mail Lists wrote:
I am a long time KDE user - in part for similar reasons to Linus - it
 was configurable, flexible and let me set things up the way I wanted  -

 ..

 
   (1)  Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
 or alive ?
 


  Followup to let you know what I decided for myself - I have switched
from KDE to Gnome. I tried, but KDE4 is just not ready today.

  Switching was not without some discomfort and effort ... of note:

- I've been unable to add items to my desktop menu(s)

- Session save remains broken - still

- gdm configuration is scattered and peculiar (combination of
/etc/gdm/ files, /etc/gconf, each users gconf, user gdm gconf) ... but
it does work

- keyring management needs help - and getting gpg-agent and
ssh-agent to work sanely took some scripting which now works perfectly
for me.

- overall I am content at this point.

   I know I am not the only person who has switched to Gnome. I will
revisit this in the coming months and perhaps KDE can recover to be the
functional, configurable, useful desktop it once was.

   gene

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-28 Thread Paulo Cavalcanti
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com wrote:

 On 12/21/2008 02:05 PM, Mail Lists wrote:
 I am a long time KDE user - in part for similar reasons to Linus - it
  was configurable, flexible and let me set things up the way I wanted  -

  ..

 
(1)  Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
  or alive ?
 


   Followup to let you know what I decided for myself - I have switched
 from KDE to Gnome. I tried, but KDE4 is just not ready today.


I disagree, and I am always have been a gnome user.





  Switching was not without some discomfort and effort ... of note:

- I've been unable to add items to my desktop menu(s)

- Session save remains broken - still


There is a way of implementing a manual session save for gnome:

http://blogs.sun.com/mattman/entry/gnome_2_24_session_save1

It is working just fine for me, even with compiz. I just need to click
on a panel icon to send my terminals and applications to their appropriate
locations.

Note that this works only for gnome-terminal 2.24 (F10). gnome-terminal 2.18
(F8)
seems to not allow the changing of a terminal title.

-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-28 Thread Gordon Messmer

Mail Lists wrote:

  Switching was not without some discomfort and effort ... of note:

- I've been unable to add items to my desktop menu(s)


System - Preferences - Look and Feel - Main Menu

I'm able to add and remove items using this tool.


- keyring management needs help - and getting gpg-agent and
ssh-agent to work sanely took some scripting which now works perfectly
for me.


If you're on F10, you're probably trying too hard.  At least ssh-agent 
functionality is built in to the gnome-keyring-daemon.  You don't have 
to start it yourself.  You probably don't even need to run 'ssh-add'; 
you'll be prompted for the passphrase to keys in the default paths when 
ssh tries to use them for the first time (or at login, if you click a 
checkbox).


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-03 Thread Ambrogio
On ven, 2009-01-02 at 16:26 -0400, Armin wrote:

 Guys, for god's sake, this thread is really starting to walk on my nerves.  
 Have you guys ever tried 4.2 beta 2?  And plus, if you love evolution, why 
 not 
 just use gnome.  KMail in my opinion is way better and easier to configure 
 that 
 evolution and kde apps just make sense, and that is why I chose KDE.
I use KDE from official repos for Fedora 9.
I don't have time to install and test the 4.2beta2 version, because I
don't have skills to do it. 
I don't work very well with desktops.
I prefere KDE only because I ever used it. Maybe I will like Gnome if I
will start to use it.

Changing from kde3 to kde4 maybe could be the right moment to switch to
gnome, because kde4 is very different from the kde3 but I will stay on
KDE.

If I love evolution can I use it on KDE? I used it on KDE for years, why
I have to switch to gnome now?

And if I love gimp, I have to switch to gnome?
And if after I love ktorrent or sone k* I have to switch to KDE?

So, it's better to have 2 desktop session and switch from one to the
other simply clicking ctrl-alt-F6 and clicking ctrl-alt-F7 for example?
I don't understand this approach... I like linux because it permit me to
choise between desktops, between application.
Now I think that this is not so true like in the past.

 Plus, it's very good if you guys appreciate the work of KDE devs.  They have 
 *re-written* most of KDE, and with great change comes great problems.  Use 
 it, 
 love it, adore it, and report it, and help it. :)
 If you don't have coding skills, help with the artwork, bug reports, 
 documentation, etc. etc. and if you do have coding skills, fix the bugs.  
 It's 
 that easy!
I'm involved in some other QA on the open source, so I know that this is
a good approach to the problem, but before to open a bug I will know if
I'm the only one that has the problem, or is a choice.

 On top of all, I can do things now that I have never been able to do in KDE 
 3.x.
That's true, but you can't do things that you done in the past

 Happy new year :)
Happy new year to you too

Bye
 Ambrogio

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-03 Thread Anne Wilson
On Saturday 03 January 2009 10:52:40 Ambrogio wrote:
 On ven, 2009-01-02 at 16:26 -0400, Armin wrote:


 If I love evolution can I use it on KDE? I used it on KDE for years, why
 I have to switch to gnome now?

 And if I love gimp, I have to switch to gnome?
 And if after I love ktorrent or sone k* I have to switch to KDE?

 So, it's better to have 2 desktop session and switch from one to the
 other simply clicking ctrl-alt-F6 and clicking ctrl-alt-F7 for example?
 I don't understand this approach... I like linux because it permit me to
 choise between desktops, between application.
 Now I think that this is not so true like in the past.

Hi, Ambrogio.  You really don't have to switch to gnome to use evolution or 
gimp, or any other application (nor would you have to switch to kde if you 
were running in gnome and wanted to run a kde application).  Installing the 
application you want will pull in any necessary libraries, and the application 
will run on either desktop.  I do use some gnome applications on my kde 
desktop.

  Plus, it's very good if you guys appreciate the work of KDE devs.  They
  have *re-written* most of KDE, and with great change comes great
  problems.  Use it, love it, adore it, and report it, and help it. :)
  If you don't have coding skills, help with the artwork, bug reports,
  documentation, etc. etc. and if you do have coding skills, fix the bugs. 
  It's that easy!

 I'm involved in some other QA on the open source, so I know that this is
 a good approach to the problem, but before to open a bug I will know if
 I'm the only one that has the problem, or is a choice.

Agreed - I also prefer to check whether others experience a problem, since if 
I'm the only one experiencing it, it's likely to be my configuration that's at 
fault.

  On top of all, I can do things now that I have never been able to do in
  KDE 3.x.

 That's true, but you can't do things that you done in the past

A few, but not many now.  The problem is that some of the things are done 
differently, so if there are particular things that you miss, do ask.  We may 
be able to tell you how to do it, and if not, we may be able to tell you 
whether it is work-in-progress.

Anne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-03 Thread Ambrogio
On sab, 2009-01-03 at 11:25 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
 Hi, Ambrogio.  You really don't have to switch to gnome to use evolution or 
 gimp, or any other application (nor would you have to switch to kde if you 
 were running in gnome and wanted to run a kde application).  Installing the 
 application you want will pull in any necessary libraries, and the 
 application 
 will run on either desktop.  I do use some gnome applications on my kde 
 desktop.
Yes, I know that. My mail was only a provocation :-)
About interation and integration of desktops and applications, I have a
lot of problems.

For example, I'm Italian and I like in most cases that applications
localized work well.
But, if I start gnome and I launch evolution and gimp (that are 2
applications that I use very often) menus are in italian.
If I start KDE and use the KDE apps, they are in Italian, but evolution
and gnome are in english.
I was unable to obtain the italian menu. Apps depend on desktop
configuration, so using of the environment vars wasn't usefull.

 Agreed - I also prefer to check whether others experience a problem, since if 
 I'm the only one experiencing it, it's likely to be my configuration that's 
 at 
 fault.
I think this is the right approach, and also read and check other
similar bugs or help request.

 A few, but not many now.  The problem is that some of the things are done 
 differently, so if there are particular things that you miss, do ask.  We may 
 be able to tell you how to do it, and if not, we may be able to tell you 
 whether it is work-in-progress.
I know that there are everytime things that are work-in-progress, and
other that are impossible.
I need everytime the last one :-)

Bye
-- 
Ambrogio De Lorenzo
Professional Services Manager
EMC Proven Specialist

Tel:+39 340 1832924
Fax:+39 02 700430148
Email:  ambrogio.delore...@gdit.it
ICQ:161962491
Linux User #389536

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-03 Thread Michael Leung
I use KDE too.
Regards,
Michael Leung
www.michaelleung.info
http://diary.skynovel.info



On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Ambrogio fn050...@interfree.it wrote:

 On sab, 2009-01-03 at 11:25 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
  Hi, Ambrogio.  You really don't have to switch to gnome to use evolution
 or
  gimp, or any other application (nor would you have to switch to kde if
 you
  were running in gnome and wanted to run a kde application).  Installing
 the
  application you want will pull in any necessary libraries, and the
 application
  will run on either desktop.  I do use some gnome applications on my kde
  desktop.
 Yes, I know that. My mail was only a provocation :-)
 About interation and integration of desktops and applications, I have a
 lot of problems.

 For example, I'm Italian and I like in most cases that applications
 localized work well.
 But, if I start gnome and I launch evolution and gimp (that are 2
 applications that I use very often) menus are in italian.
 If I start KDE and use the KDE apps, they are in Italian, but evolution
 and gnome are in english.
 I was unable to obtain the italian menu. Apps depend on desktop
 configuration, so using of the environment vars wasn't usefull.

  Agreed - I also prefer to check whether others experience a problem,
 since if
  I'm the only one experiencing it, it's likely to be my configuration
 that's at
  fault.
 I think this is the right approach, and also read and check other
 similar bugs or help request.

  A few, but not many now.  The problem is that some of the things are done
  differently, so if there are particular things that you miss, do ask.  We
 may
  be able to tell you how to do it, and if not, we may be able to tell you
  whether it is work-in-progress.
 I know that there are everytime things that are work-in-progress, and
 other that are impossible.
 I need everytime the last one :-)

 Bye
 --
 Ambrogio De Lorenzo
 Professional Services Manager
 EMC Proven Specialist

 Tel:+39 340 1832924
 Fax:+39 02 700430148
 Email:  ambrogio.delore...@gdit.it
 ICQ:161962491
 Linux User #389536

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines




-- 
Regards,
Michael Leung
http://www.itblogs.info
http://www.michaelleung.info
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-03 Thread Anne Wilson
On Saturday 03 January 2009 11:44:30 Ambrogio wrote:
 For example, I'm Italian and I like in most cases that applications
 localized work well.
 But, if I start gnome and I launch evolution and gimp (that are 2
 applications that I use very often) menus are in italian.
 If I start KDE and use the KDE apps, they are in Italian, but evolution
 and gnome are in english.
 I was unable to obtain the italian menu. Apps depend on desktop
 configuration, so using of the environment vars wasn't usefull.

I can see that that's a problem :-)  I'm sure it must be possible to do 
something about this, but it's a specialist area.  I wonder if Kevin Koffler 
can help?  I feel that there must be specialist lists for handling language 
problems.  I'd be inclined to try asking on kde-i18n-it - 
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-i18n-it

Although the main focus is on translation they may well be able to tell you 
what you need to do to get the languages correctly aligned.

HTH

Anne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-02 Thread Armin
On Friday 02 January 2009 16:15:35 Ambrogio wrote:
 On dom, 2008-12-21 at 14:05 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
  That was the way things used to be. Now KDE is harder to configure,
  not as flexible and is difficult if not impossible to set up the way I
  like things (task manager showing 1 icon per console or per firefox, the
  workspace chooser in the middle, the ability to click and save a session
  etc etc).

 And what about the integration between KDE and Gnome applications.
 I'm not able to set the right language for Evolution, gimp and some
 other gnome application.
 Before in KDE 3 I never had that problems.

 Bye
  Ambrogio

Guys, for god's sake, this thread is really starting to walk on my nerves.  
Have you guys ever tried 4.2 beta 2?  And plus, if you love evolution, why not 
just use gnome.  KMail in my opinion is way better and easier to configure that 
evolution and kde apps just make sense, and that is why I chose KDE.

Plus, it's very good if you guys appreciate the work of KDE devs.  They have 
*re-written* most of KDE, and with great change comes great problems.  Use it, 
love it, adore it, and report it, and help it. :)

If you don't have coding skills, help with the artwork, bug reports, 
documentation, etc. etc. and if you do have coding skills, fix the bugs.  It's 
that easy!

On top of all, I can do things now that I have never been able to do in KDE 
3.x.

And well, I won't forget to mention, Happy new year :)
-- 
Armin

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-02 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Armin feng.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Friday 02 January 2009 16:15:35 Ambrogio wrote:
 On dom, 2008-12-21 at 14:05 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
  That was the way things used to be. Now KDE is harder to configure,
  not as flexible and is difficult if not impossible to set up the way I
  like things (task manager showing 1 icon per console or per firefox, the
  workspace chooser in the middle, the ability to click and save a session
  etc etc).

 And what about the integration between KDE and Gnome applications.
 I'm not able to set the right language for Evolution, gimp and some
 other gnome application.
 Before in KDE 3 I never had that problems.

 Bye
  Ambrogio



 Guys, for god's sake, this thread is really starting to walk on my nerves.

Thank you, I was wondering if I was alone.

 Have you guys ever tried 4.2 beta 2?  And plus, if you love evolution, why not
 just use gnome.

Fair point. I prefer Thunderbird myself, but I am trying out Kmail

 KMail in my opinion is way better and easier to configure that
 evolution

True, KMail has been quite buggy for me though

 and kde apps just make sense, and that is why I chose KDE.

 Plus, it's very good if you guys appreciate the work of KDE devs.  They have
 *re-written* most of KDE

Kmail looks to be the old one though. Well, the entire Kontact suite
seems to be 3.5.x

 , and with great change comes great problems.  Use it,
 love it, adore it, and report it, and help it. :)

 If you don't have coding skills, help with the artwork, bug reports,
 documentation, etc. etc. and if you do have coding skills, fix the bugs.  It's
 that easy!

 On top of all, I can do things now that I have never been able to do in KDE
 3.x.

True

 And well, I won't forget to mention, Happy new year :)
 --
 Armin

Peace.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2009-01-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Anne Wilson wrote:
 I tried to find out the current state of this, for you.

The echos I got from upstream are that it should be way better in 4.2 than
4.1. They implemented a new library called Kephal in kdebase-workspace
which is designed to improve multi-monitor support.

 explaned me that if you start KDE and after you plug-in the monitor and
 you configure it from the System Setting you are using XRenderR

That would be XRandR (X Resize and Rotate - its original functionality was
to allow resizing (i.e. switching the resolution of) or rotating the
screen without restarting X11, support for adding/removing screens has been
added later).

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-31 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 30 December 2008 14:00:22 Ian Pilcher wrote:
 Proper dual-head support is the omission that affects me the most right
 now.

I tried to find out the current state of this, for you.  Here are the replies 
I've received so far:

1) Dual monitor as in Xinerama or NVidia's TwinView?

I've been using that forever, since I first started using KDE 4. The only 
thing that annoyed me in the beginning was the inability to add a Plasma 
panel to the right screen. That has been fixed for a long while (though 
that might mean it's a KDE 4.2 fix).

2) I had a very bad experience with a dual monitor in KDE4.2b2, and after I 
spoke with a very nice guy in #kwin (his name started with Z, iirc) that 
explaned me that if you start KDE and after you plug-in the monitor and you 
configure it from the System Setting you are using XRenderR that is under 
development but is not complete, while there is a way through Xorg to 
configure correctly the dual monitor (I don't had enough time to test this 
way)

3) My experience: If its setup via xorg.conf statically it works quite well
(can't recall any plasma problems with that). Dynamically enabling a
monitor via xrandr still doesn't work, it crashes kwin endlessly (i.e. its
unusable) and IIRC also plasma still has a problem with that (didn't notice
the new screen and hence didn't setup a containment for it).

I guess that whatever it was I read (probably in a developer's blog) it was 
talking about a new commit that brings this nearer.  It sounds to me as though 
it will not be ready/complete when 4.2 is released.

If I get anything more concrete I'll pass it on.

Anne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-31 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 31 December 2008 08:16:44 Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Tuesday 30 December 2008 14:00:22 Ian Pilcher wrote:
  Proper dual-head support is the omission that affects me the most right
  now.

 I tried to find out the current state of this, for you.  Here are the
 replies I've received so far:

 1) Dual monitor as in Xinerama or NVidia's TwinView?

 I've been using that forever, since I first started using KDE 4. The only
 thing that annoyed me in the beginning was the inability to add a Plasma
 panel to the right screen. That has been fixed for a long while (though
 that might mean it's a KDE 4.2 fix).

 2) I had a very bad experience with a dual monitor in KDE4.2b2, and after I
 spoke with a very nice guy in #kwin (his name started with Z, iirc) that
 explaned me that if you start KDE and after you plug-in the monitor and you
 configure it from the System Setting you are using XRenderR that is under
 development but is not complete, while there is a way through Xorg to
 configure correctly the dual monitor (I don't had enough time to test this
 way)

 3) My experience: If its setup via xorg.conf statically it works quite well
 (can't recall any plasma problems with that). Dynamically enabling a
 monitor via xrandr still doesn't work, it crashes kwin endlessly (i.e. its
 unusable) and IIRC also plasma still has a problem with that (didn't notice
 the new screen and hence didn't setup a containment for it).

 I guess that whatever it was I read (probably in a developer's blog) it was
 talking about a new commit that brings this nearer.  It sounds to me as
 though it will not be ready/complete when 4.2 is released.

 If I get anything more concrete I'll pass it on.

One other person said that he has twinview working in 4.1.3.  Does that help?

Anne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-30 Thread Ian Pilcher
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
 Taking note that 'removed functionality' is not the same as 'has not
 yet been added back', what functionality do you need that has been
 removed from KDE 4.x?

If it hadn't been removed, it wouldn't need adding back.

Proper dual-head support is the omission that affects me the most right
now.  This is an area in which KDE 3.5 is far ahead of GNOME.  OTOH, I
find KDE 4 to be completely unusable on a dual-head setup.

-- 

Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-30 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote:
 Arthur Pemberton wrote:
 Taking note that 'removed functionality' is not the same as 'has not
 yet been added back', what functionality do you need that has been
 removed from KDE 4.x?

 If it hadn't been removed, it wouldn't need adding back.

Well just needs adding, not adding back. They started the code base
fresh as far as I understand... which means it hasn't been removed.

 Proper dual-head support is the omission that affects me the most right
 now.  This is an area in which KDE 3.5 is far ahead of GNOME.  OTOH, I
 find KDE 4 to be completely unusable on a dual-head setup.


I thought dual head was mostly an X issue.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
MKas wrote:
  kdeutilsi3866:4.1.3-1.fc10installed 
  5.6 M

Depends on system-config-printer for the printer applet. That in turn pulls
in some GNOME stuff. We should probably get system-config-printer split as
it is in Ubuntu (they separate the core files from the GNOME GUI).

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-27 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
 MKas wrote:
  kdeutilsi3866:4.1.3-1.fc10installed
  5.6 M

 Depends on system-config-printer for the printer applet. That in turn pulls
 in some GNOME stuff. We should probably get system-config-printer split as
 it is in Ubuntu (they separate the core files from the GNOME GUI).

Kevin Kofler

Why does the GUI depend on gnome at all? As opposed to just Gtk?

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-27 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
 Arthur Pemberton wrote:
 Why does the GUI [of system-config-printer] depend on gnome at all? As
 opposed to just Gtk?

 It depends on gnome-python2, presumably because it uses some of its
 features. (I think the systray applet is what uses the GNOME libs.) Just as
 programs depend on KDE rather than just Qt for good reasons.

 I don't think removing the GNOME dependency is the correct solution,
 splitting off the common, non-GUI files shared with KDE into a
 system-config-printer-common subpackage is. (I should have filed a bug to
 request this ages ago.)

Kevin Kofler


Okay, I somewhat curious to take a look at system-config-samba myself
as last time I tried it i raised an exception and died quietly.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-26 Thread MKas
I like KDE, but what I see:

bash-3.2# yum remove *gnome*  
Resolution  

Dependencies Resolved


 Package ArchVersion   Repository  Size 

Removing:   
 NetworkManager-gnomei3861:0.7.0-0.12.svn4326.fc10 installed  889 k 
 PolicyKit-gnome i3860.9-3.fc10installed  398 k 
 PolicyKit-gnome-libsi3860.9-3.fc10installed   40 k 
 bluez-gnome i3861.8-8.fc10installed  632 k 
 fedora-gnome-theme  noarch  8.0.0-7.fc10  installed   18 k 
 gnome-desktop   i3862.24.2-1.fc10 installed  2.7 M 
 gnome-icon-themenoarch  2.24.0-1.fc10 installed   11 M 
 gnome-keyring   i3862.24.1-1.fc10 installed  2.3 M 
 gnome-keyring-pam   i3862.24.1-1.fc10 installed   32 k 
 gnome-menus i3862.24.2-1.fc10 installed  680 k 
 gnome-mime-data noarch  2.18.0-3.fc10 installed  3.5 M 
 gnome-mount i3860.8-1.fc9 installed  575 k 
 gnome-panel i3862.24.2-1.fc10 installed  9.3 M 
 gnome-panel-libsi3862.24.2-1.fc10 installed   56 k 
 gnome-python2   i3862.22.3-1.fc10 installed   95 k 
 gnome-python2-bonoboi3862.22.3-1.fc10 installed  317 k 
 gnome-python2-canvasi3862.22.3-1.fc10 installed   60 k 
 gnome-python2-extrasi3862.19.1-25.fc10installed  260 k 
 gnome-python2-gnome i3862.22.3-1.fc10 installed  306 k 
 gnome-python2-gnomevfs  i3862.22.3-1.fc10 installed  301 k 
 gnome-python2-gtkhtml2  i3862.19.1-25.fc10installed   18 k 
 gnome-session   i3862.24.2-1.fc10 installed  1.8 M 
 gnome-session-xsession  i3862.24.2-1.fc10 installed  4.6 k 
 gnome-settings-daemon   i3862.24.1-3.fc10 installed  1.7 M 
 gnome-themesnoarch  2.24.1-1.fc10 installed  3.9 M 
 gnome-vfs2  i3862.24.0-3.fc10 installed  3.1 M 
 libgail-gnome   i3861.20.1-1.fc10 installed   50 k 
 libgnomei3862.24.1-7.fc10 installed  2.8 M 
 libgnomecanvas  i3862.20.1.1-4.fc10   installed  829 k 
 libgnomekbd i3862.24.0-1.fc10 installed  629 k 
 libgnomeui  i3862.24.0-2.fc10 installed  3.4 M 
 nodoka-theme-gnome  noarch  0.3.90-2.fc10 installed   19 k 
Removing for dependencies:  
 bluez   i3864.19-1.fc10   installed  979 k 
 control-center  i3861:2.24.0.1-9.fc10 installed  7.1 M 
 eel2i3862.24.1-4.fc10 installed  704 k 
 evolution-data-server   i3862.24.2-1.fc10 installed   11 M 
 fedora-icon-theme   noarch  1.0.0-4.fc10  installed  114 k
 firefox i3863.0.5-1.fc10  installed   14 M
 firstboot   i3861.102-1.fc10  installed  652 k
 gdm i3861:2.24.0-12.fc10  installed  3.2 M
 gtkhtml2i3862.11.1-4.fc10 installed  441 k
 gtkhtml3i3863.24.2-1.fc10 installed  3.3 M
 gvfsi3861.0.3-4.fc10  installed  3.2 M
 gvfs-obexftpi3861.0.3-4.fc10  installed  131 k
 kdeutilsi3866:4.1.3-1.fc10installed  5.6 M
 krb5-auth-dialogi3860.7-7.fc9 installed   52 k
 libbonoboui i3862.24.0-1.fc10 installed  1.1 M
 mysql-query-browser i3865.0r12-9.fc10 installed  4.3 M
 plymouth-gdm-hooks  i3860.6.0-0.2008.11.17.3.fc10 installed   171
 policycoreutils-gui i3862.0.57-14.fc10installed  666 k
 setroubleshoot  noarch  2.0.12-3.fc10 installed  275 k
 system-config-date  noarch  1.9.34-1.fc10 installed  3.8 M
 system-config-keyboard  noarch  1.2.15-4.fc10 installed  189 k
 system-config-network   noarch  1.5.93-2.fc10 installed  1.8 M
 system-config-printer   i3861.0.12-2.fc10 installed  1.6 M
 

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-26 Thread Timothy Murphy
MKas wrote:

 I like KDE, but what I see:
 
 bash-3.2# yum remove *gnome*

Surely you don't have to remove *gnome* in order to use KDE?

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-26 Thread Ian Pilcher
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 We went a few rounds about this several months ago. I said at the time
 that Fedora is a Gnome platform that also supports KDE, but that
 seemed to bother some people (to be clear: I'm a KDE user myself).
 
 However even if this is the case with Fedora, it doesn't mean that
 Gnome has won in any meaningful sense. There are several popular
 distros out there that one could call KDE based but also supporting
 Gnome, Suse being the most obvious example.

As the person that kicked off this little sub-thread, let me chime in
and agree with Patrick's statement.  I never said (nor did I mean to
imply) that there is anything wrong with Fedora's GNOME-centricity.

The point I was trying to make is that KDE users have often had a some-
what more difficult time getting everything to work smoothly than have
GNOME users.  This tends to show up in areas like fonts and colors in
GTK+ applications and the integration of the desktop with lower-level
hardware-related stuff.

In the past, I accepted these inconveniences, because I found KDE to be
a more productive environment.  With the EOL of KDE 3, that is decidedly
no longer the case (for me).  Why then, should I continue to accept the
negative aspects of running KDE on Fedora when the positive aspects no
longer exist?

As a final point, let me say that I absolutely do not blame any of the
Fedora developers, the KDE SIG, etc., for this situation.  From my
perspective, this is entirely the fault of the KDE developers who
decided it is OK to remove longstanding functionality because plasmoids
(whatever they are) are going to be really cool someday.

-- 

Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-26 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote:
 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 As a final point, let me say that I absolutely do not blame any of the
 Fedora developers, the KDE SIG, etc., for this situation.  From my
 perspective, this is entirely the fault of the KDE developers who
 decided it is OK to remove longstanding functionality because plasmoids
 (whatever they are) are going to be really cool someday.

Taking note that 'removed functionality' is not the same as 'has not
yet been added back', what functionality do you need that has been
removed from KDE 4.x?

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-26 Thread Timothy Murphy
Arthur Pemberton wrote:

 On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net
 wrote:
 MKas wrote:

 I like KDE, but what I see:

 bash-3.2# yum remove *gnome*

 Surely you don't have to remove *gnome* in order to use KDE?
 
 True. But it makes the arguement that KDE in Fedora is vibrant more
 difficult when you can't have KDE without Gnome.

Actually, I installed Fedora-10 from the KDE Live CD,
and then yum groupinstall-ed KDE (K Desktop Environment),
and I only had half a dozen gnome applications on my laptop,
which I can live with, personally.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-24 Thread Thomas Cameron

Ian Pilcher wrote:

Mail Lists wrote:

  (1)  Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
or alive ?


I'm strongly considering it.  Almost all of the applications that I use
regularly are GTK-based anyway, and Red Hat and Fedora have always been
more focused on GNOME than KDE, so it's hard to see any reason to
continue with KDE now that the things that I like about it have been
sacrificed on the altar of the KDE developers' grand vision.


Good thing you're not bitter, eh?  :-D

I kid, I kid!

TC

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Security In F/OSS KDE [Was Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?]

2008-12-24 Thread Peter Gordon
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 14:30 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
 [...]
 several years of experience with it on 4 different platforms (OpenBSD,
 Fedora, OpenSuse, and FreeBSD) have convinced me that KDE has security
 holes (or bugs) which permit exploits which cause me lots of trouble.

This happens with all software - and is not a trait of KDE alone. This,
I believe, gives Free and Open-source Software (F/OSS) one of its
major advantages over proprietary alternatives: The entire world, in
theory, has access to peruse through and fix things in the source code -
instead of one company or a subset of people therein. Security issues
are thus found and fixed in a more timely and correct fashion. 
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42) pe...@thecodergeek.com
「ゴードン・ピーター」


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-23 Thread Rex Dieter
Armin Moradi wrote:

 You mean the PolicyKit prompts? Santa is bringing you this review
 request. ;-)
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199
 I'm doing the review, I think we can get this into Rawhide soon, and then
 we'll see for F10 and F9.

Kevin Kofler

 
 Thanks! :D  will it be pushed as an update to F10? or should we wait till
 F11?

Probably coming with/near kde-4.2, when it lands in updates.

-- Rex


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-23 Thread Armin Moradi
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:

 Armin Moradi wrote:

  You mean the PolicyKit prompts? Santa is bringing you this review
  request. ;-)
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199
  I'm doing the review, I think we can get this into Rawhide soon, and
 then
  we'll see for F10 and F9.
 
 Kevin Kofler
 
 
  Thanks! :D  will it be pushed as an update to F10? or should we wait till
  F11?

 Probably coming with/near kde-4.2, when it lands in updates.

 -- Rex


 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Oh that's perfect, thanks Rex!

-- 
Armin

Character is a muscle
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Alain Roger wrote:
 For now i just found in Gnome the terminal features nice...lkike
 transparent background... but the menu by itself is horrible as usual :-(

Konsole can also do transparent background (it's set up in your Konsole
color scheme), but only if you have desktop effects enabled in the window
manager (because it's true transparency, not fake transparency).

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mail Lists wrote:
   (1)  Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
 or alive ?

Nope, I'm still using and comaintaining KDE, I don't see how KDE 4.1 is any
worse than 3.5. Well, there's a couple of missing features, but most of
those are coming back in 4.2. I don't think switching to GNOME makes any
sense, really, but of course you're free to use whatever you prefer, as
always.

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Mike Cloaked



Kevin Kofler wrote:
 
 
 Nope, I'm still using and comaintaining KDE, I don't see how KDE 4.1 is
 any
 worse than 3.5. Well, there's a couple of missing features, but most of
 those are coming back in 4.2. I don't think switching to GNOME makes any
 sense, really, but of course you're free to use whatever you prefer, as
 always.
 
 

I really do hope that KDE4.2 lives up to expectations. I have until recently
been a loyal user of KDE (from the days of FC1!) but felt I could not use
KDE4.1 as it stands so I have temporarily switched to Gnome for F10. It is
not perfect for some of the things I need though, and I am really hoping
that when KDE4.2 is released to F10 in 2009 that it will be functional to a
level where I can switch back to using KDE again.

I have not tried the KDE 4.2 test version (in EPEL?) that I believe was
recently made available, but it would be nice to see good reviews and
summaries of what works and what is still missing or buggy so that when it
is released I can feel confident of making the switch back.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/is-KDE-dead---did-Gnome-win--tp21118075p21126663.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mike Cloaked wrote:
 I have not tried the KDE 4.2 test version (in EPEL?)

No, in kde-redhat.

EPEL is Fedora packages which are not included in RHEL rebuilt for
RHEL/CentOS/Scientific Linux, it has nothing to do with this.

4.1.85 (4.2 Beta 2) is now in kde-redhat's testing repository. But please
keep in mind that it is still a beta version. Do not expect that version to
be stable just yet.

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Ian Pilcher
Armin Moradi wrote:
 That argument is really old.  Nowadays with the great work of the KDE
 SIG, Fedora is
 as much KDE centred as it is focused on GNOME.  You see little to no
 difference between
 them these days!

Call me when system-config-* is written in Qt.

-- 

Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Rex Dieter
Ian Pilcher wrote:

 Armin Moradi wrote:
 That argument is really old.  Nowadays with the great work of the KDE
 SIG, Fedora is
 as much KDE centred as it is focused on GNOME.  You see little to no
 difference between
 them these days!
 
 Call me when system-config-* is written in Qt.

Imo, there are much better uses of developer time than to re-write
system-config-* tools in multiple toolkits.  

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Armin Moradi
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Mike Cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:



 Kevin Kofler wrote:


 Nope, I'm still using and comaintaining KDE, I don't see how KDE 4.1 is
 any
 worse than 3.5. Well, there's a couple of missing features, but most of
 those are coming back in 4.2. I don't think switching to GNOME makes any
 sense, really, but of course you're free to use whatever you prefer, as
 always.



 I really do hope that KDE4.2 lives up to expectations. I have until recently
 been a loyal user of KDE (from the days of FC1!) but felt I could not use
 KDE4.1 as it stands so I have temporarily switched to Gnome for F10. It is
 not perfect for some of the things I need though, and I am really hoping
 that when KDE4.2 is released to F10 in 2009 that it will be functional to a
 level where I can switch back to using KDE again.

 I have not tried the KDE 4.2 test version (in EPEL?) that I believe was
 recently made available, but it would be nice to see good reviews and
 summaries of what works and what is still missing or buggy so that when it
 is released I can feel confident of making the switch back.
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://www.nabble.com/is-KDE-dead---did-Gnome-win--tp21118075p21126663.html
 Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


I will tell you my opinion.  KDE 4.2 (beta 2 for now) has lived up to
more than my expectations.
I don't really know what you guys expect from it, but it satisfies all
of my needs and luxury desires.

-- 
Armin

Character is a muscle

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Armin Moradi
Although I would like to see the dialog that asks for password, written in Qt
so it would have a more native look.

--
Armin
Character is a muscle

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote:
 Armin Moradi wrote:
 That argument is really old.  Nowadays with the great work of the KDE
 SIG, Fedora is
 as much KDE centred as it is focused on GNOME.  You see little to no
 difference between
 them these days!

 Call me when system-config-* is written in Qt.

What a waste of time that would be. Why would you do that? They are
just system tools. They aren't desktop apps.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Ian Pilcher
Rex Dieter wrote:
 Imo, there are much better uses of developer time than to re-write
 system-config-* tools in multiple toolkits.  

I never claimed otherwise.

-- 

Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Rex Dieter
Ian Pilcher wrote:

 Rex Dieter wrote:
 Imo, there are much better uses of developer time than to re-write
 system-config-* tools in multiple toolkits.
 
 I never claimed otherwise.

I fail to see the point of making the the comment then.

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Rex Dieter
Jeff Spaleta wrote:

 On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
 wrote:
 You mean the PolicyKit prompts? Santa is bringing you this review
 request. ;-)
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199
 I'm doing the review, I think we can get this into Rawhide soon, and then
 we'll see for F10 and F9.

 Does that provide a KDE equivalent to the polkit-gnome-authorization gui?

As I understand it, yes.

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-22 Thread Armin Moradi
 You mean the PolicyKit prompts? Santa is bringing you this review
 request. ;-)
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199
 I'm doing the review, I think we can get this into Rawhide soon, and then
 we'll see for F10 and F9.

Kevin Kofler


Thanks! :D  will it be pushed as an update to F10? or should we wait till
F11?

-- 
Armin

Character is a muscle
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Mail Lists

   I am a long time KDE user - in part for similar reasons to Linus - it
was configurable, flexible and let me set things up the way I wanted  -
easily and simply. It had a very nice configuration manager. Gnome by
contrast was rigid, inflexible and to configure it - the bits  it
allowed you to -  you needed in part to learn about its registry which
warned you that the registry editor may corrupt things in bad ways - use
at your risk. Gnome was undergoing rapid changes - metacity went through
a lot before it was stable .. kde all the while was pretty stable.

  That was the way things used to be. Now KDE is harder to configure,
not as flexible and is difficult if not impossible to set up the way I
like things (task manager showing 1 icon per console or per firefox, the
workspace chooser in the middle, the ability to click and save a session
etc etc).

  So what I am seeing is some of the KDE users I know are slowly giving
up and moving back to gnome - its the default windowing
manager/environment on fedora and ubuntu and seems more mature and
stable than KDE 4 - and since as far as configurability goes, KDE has
little advantage to offer at this time. Perhaps the next version, or the
one after that will bring back the advantages. Maybe by 4.2 or 4.3 or
4.4 or... 5.0 ..

 So seeking guidance from the path others are choosing:

  (1)  Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
or alive ?

  (2) Are there fedora Gnome users moving to KDE ? It is after all very
similar in its function now ... and does not use spatial mode by default
(;-).

  Be very interested in hearing what thoughts others are having.

  gene

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Alain Roger
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com wrote:


   I am a long time KDE user - in part for similar reasons to Linus - it
 was configurable, flexible and let me set things up the way I wanted  -
 easily and simply. It had a very nice configuration manager. Gnome by
 contrast was rigid, inflexible and to configure it - the bits  it
 allowed you to -  you needed in part to learn about its registry which
 warned you that the registry editor may corrupt things in bad ways - use
 at your risk. Gnome was undergoing rapid changes - metacity went through
 a lot before it was stable .. kde all the while was pretty stable.

  That was the way things used to be. Now KDE is harder to configure,
 not as flexible and is difficult if not impossible to set up the way I
 like things (task manager showing 1 icon per console or per firefox, the
 workspace chooser in the middle, the ability to click and save a session
 etc etc).

  So what I am seeing is some of the KDE users I know are slowly giving
 up and moving back to gnome - its the default windowing
 manager/environment on fedora and ubuntu and seems more mature and
 stable than KDE 4 - and since as far as configurability goes, KDE has
 little advantage to offer at this time. Perhaps the next version, or the
 one after that will bring back the advantages. Maybe by 4.2 or 4.3 or
 4.4 or... 5.0 ..

  So seeking guidance from the path others are choosing:

  (1)  Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
 or alive ?

  (2) Are there fedora Gnome users moving to KDE ? It is after all very
 similar in its function now ... and does not use spatial mode by default
 (;-).

  Be very interested in hearing what thoughts others are having.

  gene

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Personally i've just installed Fedora 10 and now i'm installing KDE 4.1.3.
I like the interface and color choice.
For now i just found in Gnome the terminal features nice...lkike transparent
background... but the menu by itself is horrible as usual :-(
as i come from Windows world the desktop environment in KDE is much more
usable as gnome.

Alain
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Dave Feustel
I was a die-hard KDE/Konqueror user. But became an instant convert to
Firefox when I discovered NoScript. Now I have stopped using KDE because
several years of experience with it on 4 different platforms (OpenBSD,
Fedora, OpenSuse, and FreeBSD) have convinced me that KDE has security
holes (or bugs) which permit exploits which cause me lots of trouble. It's
possible that the bugs or security holes are in X itself - it's hard to
tell.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com wrote:

[ snip ]

  (1)  Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
 or alive ?

KDE has never been more alive. I stiull prefer it to Windows, MacOS and Gnome

  (2) Are there fedora Gnome users moving to KDE ? It is after all very
 similar in its function now ... and does not use spatial mode by default

KDE is far from similar in function to Gnome last I checked. That's
near an insult to KDE.


-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Dave Feustel dfeus...@mindspring.com wrote:
 I was a die-hard KDE/Konqueror user. But became an instant convert to
 Firefox when I discovered NoScript. Now I have stopped using KDE because
 several years of experience with it on 4 different platforms (OpenBSD,
 Fedora, OpenSuse, and FreeBSD) have convinced me that KDE has security
 holes (or bugs) which permit exploits which cause me lots of trouble.

Do you have any details on this?

 It's
 possible that the bugs or security holes are in X itself - it's hard to
 tell.

In that case, maybe you shouldn't associate KDE with this on a public list.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Dave Feustel
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 02:53:23PM -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Dave Feustel dfeus...@mindspring.com wrote:
  I was a die-hard KDE/Konqueror user. But became an instant convert to
  Firefox when I discovered NoScript. Now I have stopped using KDE because
  several years of experience with it on 4 different platforms (OpenBSD,
  Fedora, OpenSuse, and FreeBSD) have convinced me that KDE has security
  holes (or bugs) which permit exploits which cause me lots of trouble.
 
 Do you have any details on this?
 
  It's
  possible that the bugs or security holes are in X itself - it's hard to
  tell.
 
 In that case, maybe you shouldn't associate KDE with this on a public list.
 
I forgot to mention that I started out using Konqueror, Kmail and
Konsole. I first stopped using Kmail because of persistent bugs, then
Konsole (switched to xterm after konsole began starting with the input
window filling up with unending sequences of 'i' characters), and
finally Konqueror (which had severe dns problems never experienced by
Firefox). In the case of Konqueror, I experienced in the last several
months a sudden increase in new problems with the browser that never
occurred with Firefox. Now if the bugs were in X, then I should see them
occuring with both Xterm and with Firefox, but I have not. So the
evidence indicates the problems are in KDE. I am trying out a variety of
other windows managers to see if the problems that I had with KDE and
Gnome (on Fedora) persist. So far they seem not to.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Joonas Sarajärvi
Hi

2008/12/21 Mail Lists li...@sapience.com:

   I am a long time KDE user - in part for similar reasons to Linus - it
 was configurable, flexible and let me set things up the way I wanted  -
 easily and simply. It had a very nice configuration manager. Gnome by
 contrast was rigid, inflexible and to configure it - the bits  it
 allowed you to -  you needed in part to learn about its registry which
 warned you that the registry editor may corrupt things in bad ways - use
 at your risk. Gnome was undergoing rapid changes - metacity went through
 a lot before it was stable .. kde all the while was pretty stable.

I have used the Gnome 2.* series for a couple of years, and I find
most of your bad points regarding it at least biased, others
completely false. However, that's a bit off-topic to this thread, so
I'd rather not discuss them here unnecessarily.

  That was the way things used to be. Now KDE is harder to configure,
 not as flexible and is difficult if not impossible to set up the way I
 like things (task manager showing 1 icon per console or per firefox, the
 workspace chooser in the middle, the ability to click and save a session
 etc etc).

I haven't found KDE 4 any harder to configure than the KDE 3 series,
though I can find the things I want to configure a lot better than
before due to the cleaned-up and better organised configuration tool.

At least the taskbar is a lot more configurable in KDE 4.2 than in the
current KDE 4.1. I didn't understand the part about workspace chooser,
though.

  So what I am seeing is some of the KDE users I know are slowly giving
 up and moving back to gnome - its the default windowing
 manager/environment on fedora and ubuntu and seems more mature and
 stable than KDE 4 - and since as far as configurability goes, KDE has
 little advantage to offer at this time. Perhaps the next version, or the
 one after that will bring back the advantages. Maybe by 4.2 or 4.3 or
 4.4 or... 5.0 ..

Gnome is nowadays (mostly) very stable and mature, and it works well
for millions of people. It is also easy to use and has sane default
settings which usually require little or even no tweaking. It's a
great choice for a default desktop environment.

However, I have lately found Gnome a bit dull and boring, and have
instead started using KDE 4, which is getting tons of new developments
and opening new possibilities. To top it off, it also looks very good.
(Subject for debate! :-)


  So seeking guidance from the path others are choosing:

  (1)  Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
 or alive ?

I have never seen KDE more alive than today. I wondered the same
question a couple of years earlier, when KDE 3 seemed to progress
nowhere and KDE 4 was still mostly mockups and speculation.

  (2) Are there fedora Gnome users moving to KDE ? It is after all very
 similar in its function now ... and does not use spatial mode by default
 (;-).

When I started using GNU/Linux, I used to hop between KDE, Gnome and
other alternatives a lot, eventually settling on Gnome because it just
felt a lot better designed and polished. Now that KDE 4 is making
great progress, however, I just had to check it out and start using
it, even with its current little problems.

I miss the spatial file manager from Gnome, but I can manage to do
what I want to, even without it :-)

-- 
Joonas Sarajärvi
mue...@gmail.com

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Ian Pilcher
Mail Lists wrote:
   (1)  Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
 or alive ?

I'm strongly considering it.  Almost all of the applications that I use
regularly are GTK-based anyway, and Red Hat and Fedora have always been
more focused on GNOME than KDE, so it's hard to see any reason to
continue with KDE now that the things that I like about it have been
sacrificed on the altar of the KDE developers' grand vision.

-- 

Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Mark
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com wrote:

   I am a long time KDE user - in part for similar reasons to Linus - it
 was configurable, flexible and let me set things up the way I wanted  -
 easily and simply. It had a very nice configuration manager. Gnome by
 contrast was rigid, inflexible and to configure it - the bits  it
 allowed you to -  you needed in part to learn about its registry which
 warned you that the registry editor may corrupt things in bad ways - use
 at your risk. Gnome was undergoing rapid changes - metacity went through
 a lot before it was stable .. kde all the while was pretty stable.

  That was the way things used to be. Now KDE is harder to configure,
 not as flexible and is difficult if not impossible to set up the way I
 like things (task manager showing 1 icon per console or per firefox, the
 workspace chooser in the middle, the ability to click and save a session
 etc etc).

  So what I am seeing is some of the KDE users I know are slowly giving
 up and moving back to gnome - its the default windowing
 manager/environment on fedora and ubuntu and seems more mature and
 stable than KDE 4 - and since as far as configurability goes, KDE has
 little advantage to offer at this time. Perhaps the next version, or the
 one after that will bring back the advantages. Maybe by 4.2 or 4.3 or
 4.4 or... 5.0 ..

  So seeking guidance from the path others are choosing:

  (1)  Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
 or alive ?

  (2) Are there fedora Gnome users moving to KDE ? It is after all very
 similar in its function now ... and does not use spatial mode by default
 (;-).

  Be very interested in hearing what thoughts others are having.

  gene


I will give you my story how i switched from KDE to Gnome.
When i started with linux (the first fedora core versions) i used KDE.
At that time i found configuring KDE needlessly complex and
configuring Gnome was easier but way more limited. Nevertheless i kept
using KDE because it was simply the best for me at that time. And
that's probably because i was fresh from windows and KDE looks the
most like windows when your just switching and then you tend to go
with the environment that your already familiar with. However around
fedora 5 something changed in fedora that made me use gnome. Don't
know what it was. So i started swapping all the time between KDE and
Gnome. then the big differences started to come. compositing became
possible and gnome in combination with my hardware was just working.
kde wasn't. that's when i switched (with regret) to gnome. It doesn't
mean that i liked gnome better but it was simply the best at hand at
that time. Not long after that (or perhaps even before that) firefox
became the unofficial standard in linux distributions and i was (and
still am) a firefox fan and wanted to use it. Firefox looks ugly in
KDE but looks nice in Gnome so that was another reason for me to stick
with gnome.

Now at the present day i see things getting reversed. First gnome was
actively developed and kde was sticking at it's 3.x.x version with not
much noticeable changes that where worth the upgrade (not noticeable
for me) so gnome was just getting better. Now i see gnome lacking
behind kde because they come with new features (noticeable ones!) all
the time and there KDE 4.2 is really looking good. I tried both kde
4.0 and 4.1 but they where way to unstable to be used for my usage.
KDE 4.2 is looking way better from what i've seen but it still seems
to be way to buggy for me to use.

There is one huge issue in KDE. that's also it's biggest feature: QT.
QT seems to have issues with video cards making vesa even faster then
hardware accelerated. that is the case on both my notebook (intel gpu)
and my desktop (nvidia gpu) and weighs heavy in making KDE 4.2
unusable for me. Gnome on the other hand works fine and smooth. There
was a long time for me that i simply couldn't switch to KDE because
the available versions just didn't work out for me how i wanted it.
Now with KDE 4.2 close to getting out there finally is a DE where i
could switch to. Back to the one i came from but if that really is
gonna happen is gonna depend on how stable it works (taskbar resizing
finally works how it should be with the exception of the tray icons)

And about desktop environments for me in general. I like KDE the most
but there is NO desktop environment that provides what i want and
need. Perhaps it's gonna be made by someone someday. perhaps KDE is
gonna be that DE with version 4.5 or 5.0 or 10.0 ;)

Just my story how i switched to gnome.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Armin Moradi
 Red Hat and Fedora have always been
 more focused on GNOME than KDE, so it's hard to see any reason to
 continue with KDE now that the things that I like about it have been
 sacrificed on the altar of the KDE developers' grand vision.

That argument is really old.  Nowadays with the great work of the KDE
SIG, Fedora is
as much KDE centred as it is focused on GNOME.  You see little to no
difference between
them these days!

-- 
Armin

Character is a muscle

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Mike Cloaked



Armin Moradi wrote:
 
 
 That argument is really old.  Nowadays with the great work of the KDE
 SIG, Fedora is
 as much KDE centred as it is focused on GNOME.  You see little to no
 difference between
 them these days!
 
 

From reports it looks like KDE4.2 will be really nice - but I wonder which
desktop Linus is using at the moment?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/is-KDE-dead---did-Gnome-win--tp21118075p21123826.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Mike Cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:



 Armin Moradi wrote:


 That argument is really old.  Nowadays with the great work of the KDE
 SIG, Fedora is
 as much KDE centred as it is focused on GNOME.  You see little to no
 difference between
 them these days!



 From reports it looks like KDE4.2 will be really nice - but I wonder which
 desktop Linus is using at the moment?

I fail to see the importance of what desktop environment a kernel
hacker is using. Unless of course you're a kernel hacker yourself.
Even then, the DE is entirely userspace.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

2008-12-21 Thread Mike Cloaked



Arthur Pemberton wrote:
 
 
 I fail to see the importance of what desktop environment a kernel
 hacker is using. Unless of course you're a kernel hacker yourself.
 Even then, the DE is entirely userspace.
 
 

I guess it is not important but possibly interesting to know his thoughts
since I read some time ago that Linus was a long time avid fan of KDE. I
wondered if he still is a KDE(4) fan, as he uses Fedora I was told, that was
all.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/is-KDE-dead---did-Gnome-win--tp21118075p21123952.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines