Re: re the new KDE 4.2 (or so)

2009-04-06 Thread Steve Searle
Around 04:49pm on Monday, April 06, 2009 (UK time), Elgato Salvahey scrawled:

> It is a law of cosmology, and the second law of thermodynamics, that
> the entropy of the universe must always increase. Since this implies
> that ALL things MUST increase in complexity,

This is wrong.  Entropy in the context of the seconf law of
thermodynamics refers to increacing unavailability of a systems energy,
i.e. increacing disorder.

You are confusing it with information theory I think, which has nothing
do do with thermodynamics.

Steve

-- 
 
(o< www.stevesearle.com
//\ Powered by Fedora
V_/_No MS products were used in the creation of this message

 18:57:18 up  6:19,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00


pgpAX7RbAyYED.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

re the new KDE 4.2 (or so)

2009-04-06 Thread Elgato Salvahey
It is a law of cosmology, and the second law of thermodynamics, that the 
entropy of the
universe must
always increase. Since this implies that ALL things MUST increase in complexity,
what you say is inevitable. Take for instance the telephone. It once was a 
simple
device that did a good job for what it was intended. Contrast the modern 
cell-phone.
It plays music, surfs the net and, as an afterthought, might even allow you to 
make
a telephone call. QED

DN

powered by LINUX


  -- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: the new KDE 4.2 (or so)

2009-04-05 Thread Sharpe, Sam J
2009/4/4 Armin :
> On Sunday 05 April 2009 09:19:34 Anne Wilson wrote:
>> On Sunday 05 April 2009 12:47:20 Stanisław T. Findeisen wrote:
>> > I just wanted to share my opinion about the new KDE in Fedora 10 (KDE
>> > 4.2 or so).
>> >
>> > KDE has been my favourite desktop environment for *years* (8-10 or so).
>> > The old one in Fedora 8 (KDE 3.5 or so) was great.
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, the new one (4.2 or so) is *so heavy*, *so buggy* and so
>> > *unusable at all* that I am trying to find an alternative. It looks as
>> > if someone thought that simple, fast and stable things are bad. :-/
>> >
>> > What do you think about it?
>>
>> I think that most of us are fed up with this kind of trolling.
>
> +1 for "fed up with this kind of trolling"

-1 Redundant

--
Sam

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: the new KDE 4.2 (or so)

2009-04-05 Thread Armin
On Sunday 05 April 2009 09:19:34 Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 05 April 2009 12:47:20 Stanisław T. Findeisen wrote:
> > I just wanted to share my opinion about the new KDE in Fedora 10 (KDE
> > 4.2 or so).
> >
> > KDE has been my favourite desktop environment for *years* (8-10 or so).
> > The old one in Fedora 8 (KDE 3.5 or so) was great.
> >
> > Unfortunately, the new one (4.2 or so) is *so heavy*, *so buggy* and so
> > *unusable at all* that I am trying to find an alternative. It looks as
> > if someone thought that simple, fast and stable things are bad. :-/
> >
> > What do you think about it?
>
> I think that most of us are fed up with this kind of trolling.

+1 for "fed up with this kind of trolling"

-- 
Armin Moradi

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: the new KDE 4.2 (or so)

2009-04-05 Thread Mail Lists
On 04/05/2009 12:01 PM, David wrote:

>> I think you shgould read the archives of this list over the last 6
>> months or so.
> 
> 
> Great suggestion!  8-)
> 
> 

Please read more than just the fedora archives - (kubuntu, Linus' own
opinion, what the kde team are doing as well, and more).

 This topic is far wider than fedora and it will keep you busy for a
long time catching up on eveything (;-) and understanding not only where
things are (and were) but are going.

 Then decide for yourself if you want to switch today or not, or plan to
switch back to kde at some point in the future.


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: the new KDE 4.2 (or so)

2009-04-05 Thread David
On 4/5/2009 10:49 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 13:47 +0200, "Stanisław T. Findeisen" wrote:
>> I just wanted to share my opinion about the new KDE in Fedora 10 (KDE 
>> 4.2 or so).

>> KDE has been my favourite desktop environment for *years* (8-10 or so). 
>> The old one in Fedora 8 (KDE 3.5 or so) was great.

>> Unfortunately, the new one (4.2 or so) is *so heavy*, *so buggy* and so 
>> *unusable at all* that I am trying to find an alternative. It looks as 
>> if someone thought that simple, fast and stable things are bad. :-/

>> What do you think about it?

> I think you shgould read the archives of this list over the last 6
> months or so.


Great suggestion!  8-)


-- 


  David

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: the new KDE 4.2 (or so)

2009-04-05 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 13:47 +0200, "Stanisław T. Findeisen" wrote:
> I just wanted to share my opinion about the new KDE in Fedora 10 (KDE 
> 4.2 or so).
> 
> KDE has been my favourite desktop environment for *years* (8-10 or so). 
> The old one in Fedora 8 (KDE 3.5 or so) was great.
> 
> Unfortunately, the new one (4.2 or so) is *so heavy*, *so buggy* and so 
> *unusable at all* that I am trying to find an alternative. It looks as 
> if someone thought that simple, fast and stable things are bad. :-/
> 
> What do you think about it?

I think you shgould read the archives of this list over the last 6
months or so.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: the new KDE 4.2 (or so)

2009-04-05 Thread Joonas Sarajärvi
2009/4/5 "Stanisław T. Findeisen" :
> Unfortunately, the new one (4.2 or so) is *so heavy*, *so buggy* and so
> *unusable at all* that I am trying to find an alternative. It looks as if
> someone thought that simple, fast and stable things are bad. :-/
>
> What do you think about it?

I think it is very usable. I have used the KDE 4 series daily for
about a year, and in my opinion, it was very good already last fall
when they released KDE 4.1. KDE 4.0 has some clear shortcomings, but
even it was certainly better than "unusable at all". I used to use it
daily, too, and it wasn't nearly as hard as some people often seem to
claim.

I actually think that KDE 4.0 was already much nicer than the KDE 3
series. (I used to use Gnome before the KDE 4.0 release). Now that
there have been many very significant improvements in KDE since 4.0, I
have hard time understanding why some people are so keenly calling it
completely unusable.

-- 
Joonas Sarajärvi
mue...@gmail.com

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: the new KDE 4.2 (or so)

2009-04-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 05 April 2009 12:47:20 Stanisław T. Findeisen wrote:
> I just wanted to share my opinion about the new KDE in Fedora 10 (KDE
> 4.2 or so).
>
> KDE has been my favourite desktop environment for *years* (8-10 or so).
> The old one in Fedora 8 (KDE 3.5 or so) was great.
>
> Unfortunately, the new one (4.2 or so) is *so heavy*, *so buggy* and so
> *unusable at all* that I am trying to find an alternative. It looks as
> if someone thought that simple, fast and stable things are bad. :-/
>
> What do you think about it?
>
I think that most of us are fed up with this kind of trolling.

If you have problems with KDE4, please ask specific questions and we will try 
to help you.

Anne
-- 
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
Just found a cool new feature?  Add it to UserBase


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

the new KDE 4.2 (or so)

2009-04-05 Thread Stanisław T. Findeisen
I just wanted to share my opinion about the new KDE in Fedora 10 (KDE 
4.2 or so).


KDE has been my favourite desktop environment for *years* (8-10 or so). 
The old one in Fedora 8 (KDE 3.5 or so) was great.


Unfortunately, the new one (4.2 or so) is *so heavy*, *so buggy* and so 
*unusable at all* that I am trying to find an alternative. It looks as 
if someone thought that simple, fast and stable things are bad. :-/


What do you think about it?

STF

===
http://eisenbits.homelinux.net/~stf/
OpenPGP: 9D25 3D89 75F1 DF1D F434  25D7 E87F A1B9 B80F 8062
===



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines