[Bug 455358] Review Request: xslthl - XSLT Syntax Highlighting for saxon and xalan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455358 --- Comment #3 from Jeff Fearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 02:26:31 EDT --- I retrieved the latest source from the upstream developer and created a new spec file from scratch. Spec URL: http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/xslthl.spec SRPM URL: http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/xslthl-2.0.0.0.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456972] Review Request: eclipse-nls - Babel translations for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456972 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 02:48:51 EDT --- thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461742] Review Request: hunspell-nr Southern Ndebele hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461742 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 03:16:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hunspell-nr Short Description: Ndebele hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461736] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461736 Miroslav Suchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||452450 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461736] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461736 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 03:15:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events Short Description: Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur Owners: msuchy Branches: devel F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 Miroslav Suchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461736] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461736 Miroslav Suchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461736] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461736 Miroslav Suchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461757] Review Request: libdwarf - library for producing and consuming DWARF debugging information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461757
Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 03:33:56 EDT
---
Suggestions:-
1) you can altenatively use version as
%define upstreamid 20080818
Version: 0.%{upstreamid}
This will help you in future if you switch to releases like 1.0 or 1.0.0
otherwise you need to use always date as version.
2) You should use shared libraries scriptlet as per given here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries
3) you should use install -Dp as per given here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Timestamps
4) Though not mandatory but good if you use defattr as
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#.25files_section
5) Package build is failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=819456
You should use make as
make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -I.
Why you want to include -static package? See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #6 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:07:37 EDT --- Excellent, thanks Hans. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: nes_ntsc Short Description: Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461736] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461736 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461363] Review Request: ptlib - is a portable tools library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461363 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:18:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ptlib Short Description: Portable Tools Library Owners: pbrobinson veillard Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: pbrobinson Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461736] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461736 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:17:12 EDT --- cvs is done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #7 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:21:57 EDT --- One further question: when a reference spec is used as the basis for a Fedora spec, is there a preference on keeping the original changelog entries ? I see value in acknowledging previous contributors and issues that occurred in getting the spec to it's pre-fedora state. On the other hand, is it allowed to include those old changelog entries ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 --- Comment #23 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:23:07 EDT --- I am a bit reluctant but I will not oppose to it, as long as using a static version of minilzo is blessed by the powers-in-charge. I suggest adding this request to the agenda of the next IRC meeting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461742] Review Request: hunspell-nr Southern Ndebele hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461742 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:30:26 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461363] Review Request: ptlib - is a portable tools library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461363 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #6 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:34:13 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #8 from Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:35:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) One further question: when a reference spec is used as the basis for a Fedora spec, is there a preference on keeping the original changelog entries ? I see value in acknowledging previous contributors and issues that occurred in getting the spec to it's pre-fedora state. On the other hand, is it allowed to include those old changelog entries ? It is fine to keep the original entries. For example, I kept the old entries from hatari when I migrated it from Dribble to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461619] Review Request: switch-displaymanager - A display manager switcher for GDM, KDM, XDM and WDM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461619 --- Comment #11 from Ngo Than [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:45:56 EDT --- yes, it should be renamed to system-switch-displaymanager. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: system-switch-displaymanager Short Description: A display manager switcher for GDM, KDM, XDM and WDM Owners: than Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #9 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:59:01 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461619] Review Request: system-switch-displaymanager - A display manager switcher for GDM, KDM, XDM and WDM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461619 Ngo Than [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |switch-displaymanager - A |system-switch-displaymanage |display manager switcher|r - A display manager |for GDM, KDM, XDM and WDM |switcher for GDM, KDM, XDM ||and WDM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461757] Review Request: libdwarf - library for producing and consuming DWARF debugging information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461757 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 05:12:23 EDT --- I see no versioned libdwarf.so.*.*.* symlinks to libdwarf.so are created and not included in libdwarf rpm. Do you want to create them? In that case then you need to follow - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461897] New: Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 Summary: Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/opticalraytracer/opticalraytracer.spec SRPM URL: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/opticalraytracer/opticalraytracer-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OpticalRayTracer is a free (GPL) Linux (X windows GUI-based) utility that analyzes systems of lenses. It uses optical principles and a virtual optical bench to predict the behavior of many kinds of ordinary and exotic lens types. OpticalRayTracer includes an advanced, easy-to-use interface that allows the user to rearrange the optical configuration by simply dragging lenses around using the mouse. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=819744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461742] Review Request: hunspell-nr Southern Ndebele hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461742 Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225675] Merge Review: db4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225675 --- Comment #4 from Jindrich Novy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 05:47:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Eval of current srpm: rpmlint on srpm: Unversioned obsoletes, as above, plus: This should be fine since the obsoletes are there because of very ancient BDB versions (mostly all RHL ones) and they will never appear again. db4.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 140, tab: line 167) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. This should be fixed now. db4.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch22: db-4.5.20-jni-include-dir.patch A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches documentation to see what's wrong. D'oh, seems like I forgot to apply the patch actually after rediffing. It is now fixed as well. rpmlint on rpms: No docs for -cxx, -tcl and -static. Still the non-standard exec perm. The problem is that there is no documentation for -static, since it is actually the same as -devel but statically linked. The -cxx, -tcl is shipped without docs since there is shipped only runtime bits and I stuffed all the docs, which are actually of any use by developers into -devel subpackage. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461899] New: Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 Summary: Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/thebridge.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/thebridge-0.96-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Thebridge is an EchoLink compatible conference bridge that runs under FreeBSD, Linux, QNX, Mac OS X, Windows and hopefully most other Posix compatible operating systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461736] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461736 Miroslav Suchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461907] New: sugar-journal OLPC-3 branch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: sugar-journal OLPC-3 branch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461907 Summary: sugar-journal OLPC-3 branch Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora I could not find the original review bug... Package Change Request == Package Name: sugar-journal New Branches: OLPC-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461909] New: Review Request: sms_ntsc - SMS NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sms_ntsc - SMS NTSC video filtering library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461909 Summary: Review Request: sms_ntsc - SMS NTSC video filtering library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/sms_ntsc/sms_ntsc.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/sms_ntsc/sms_ntsc-0.2.3-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: Sega Master System NTSC video filter library. Reproduces the significant artifacts on the vertical edges of some colors that occur when colours, and the general color mixing that occur when graphics are rendered via an NTSC video connection to a television. Accepts pixels in 16-bit RGB or 12-bit BGR (native Game Gear palette format). It can also output an RGB palette for use in a regular blitter. $ rpmlint sms_ntsc.spec ~/src/redhat/SRPMS/sms_ntsc-0.2.3-3.fc9.src.rpm ~/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/*.rpm sms_ntsc-demos.i386: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461909] Review Request: sms_ntsc - SMS NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461909 --- Comment #1 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 07:18:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316422) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316422) diff between dribble spec and proposed fedora spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461910] New: Review Request: snes_ntsc - SNES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: snes_ntsc - SNES NTSC video filtering library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461910 Summary: Review Request: snes_ntsc - SNES NTSC video filtering library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/snes_ntsc/snes_ntsc.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/snes_ntsc/snes_ntsc-0.2.2-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: Super NES NTSC video filter. The main benefit is color mixing, as composite video artifacts are less noticeable than on the NES. Accepts pixels in 16-bit RGB or 15-bit BGR (native SNES format). === $ rpmlint snes_ntsc.spec ~/src/redhat/SRPMS/snes_ntsc-0.2.2-3.fc9.src.rpm ~/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/snes*.rpm snes_ntsc-demos.i386: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461910] Review Request: snes_ntsc - SNES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461910 --- Comment #1 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 07:45:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316427) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316427) diff between dribble spec and proposed fedora spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461912] New: Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 Summary: Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bogado.net/rpm/puzzles.spec SRPM URL: http://bogado.net/rpm/puzzles-8149-1.bog9.src.rpm Description: this is a collection of small desktop toys, little games that you can pop up in a window and play for two or three minutes while you take a break from whatever else you were doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452805] Review Request: ember - WorldForge client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452805 --- Comment #2 from Alexey Torkhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 08:04:07 EDT --- Spec URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/ember.spec SRPM URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/ember-0.5.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=819928 Update to 0.5.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452806] Review Request: ember-media - media files for the ember
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452806 --- Comment #4 from Alexey Torkhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 08:04:12 EDT --- Spec URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/ember-media.spec SRPM URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/ember-media-0.5.4-1.src.rpm (180M) Update to 0.5.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #1 from Victor Bogado [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 08:06:31 EDT --- Details about this package the upstream developer don't use normal version numbers he simply uses the subversion release number as an identifier for each version, this is why the version look funny. I considered several options to treat this: - use the version as if it was a pre-release, but I decided against because as far as I know this stay as a pre-release forever. - use an artificial version 0.#release but this could conflict with a future change of mind of the upstream developer. - Use the version as the developer have made, using simply the release number. I have chosen the later, as it is the most pristine way of selecting a version number, that will hopefully be compatible and comparable with version number on other distributions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461363] Review Request: ptlib - is a portable tools library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461363 Peter Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461692] Review Request: python-markdown2 - A fast and complete Python implementation of Markdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461692 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Moschny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 09:32:30 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-markdown2 Short Description: A fast and complete Python implementation of Markdown Owners: thm Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449207] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449207 Michel Alexandre Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 10:04:45 EDT --- ping again. We need notify-sharp to update gnome-do ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461929] New: Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 Summary: Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/fedora/mnemosyne.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/fedora/mnemosyne-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: Mnemosyne resembles a traditional flash-card program but with an important twist: it uses a sophisticated algorithm to schedule the best time for a card to come up for review. % rpmlint mnemosyne-1.1.1-1.noarch.rpm mnemosyne-1.1.1-1.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459983] Review Request: moe - A powerful clean text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459983 --- Comment #3 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 10:42:45 EDT --- Thanks for the comments and the suggestions. I have updated the package accordingly to remove any blockers. Here are the URLs Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/moe.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/moe-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Brian Pepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461678] Review Request: purple-microblogging - Libpurple plug-in supporting microblog services like Twitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461678 --- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 11:06:54 EDT --- ... and built in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=820399 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461678] Review Request: purple-microblogging - Libpurple plug-in supporting microblog services like Twitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461678 --- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 11:06:24 EDT --- New version fixing warnings and hopefully a lot of other issue (patches have been sent upstream). Rebased against the latest SVN (development is pretty fast, so it seemed like improper to patch old version). Source RPM: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/purple-microblogging-0.1.2-0.20080911svn148.fc10.src.rpm Spec file is in the same URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 Lubomir Rintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 11:35:12 EDT --- Hmmm, this was approved, why hasn't it been imported yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897
--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 11:27:25 EDT
---
Looks very well.
Please remove the leading blank line in %description, I am not sure it would
look well in GUI tools. Description probably needs some more love -- the fact
that the package is free doesn't need to be mentioned there (redundant, see
License tag) and X windows is correctly spelled without the trailing s and
with w capitablized: X Window, X Window System, or just X11.
It's not clear what does this line do, and why does it belong to %prep. Please
explain and add a comment:
make -f Makefile.cvs dist
What's %{_datadir}/apps? Would not %{_datadir}/raytracer be more
appropriate? In case not, please ensure you depend on the package that creates
it or own it.
%{_datadir}/apps/raytracer/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461358] Review Request: weplab - Analyzing WEP encryption security on wireless networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461358 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 12:46:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) After looking at the README I think this package should require wireless-tools. hmmm, I guess it's possible to use weplab without the wireless-tools. But this make only sense if the user wants to use it with data from another source (e. g. wireshark, tcpdump, ...). add Requires: wireless-tools New files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/weplab.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/weplab-0.1.5-3.fc9.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=820605 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 12:40:07 EDT --- Okay, then: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose Merge Review) Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 12:55:18 EDT --- gadmin-squid-0.1.0-0.4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458610] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 12:54:41 EDT --- php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql-1.4.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460297] Review Request: apricots - 2D air combat game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460297 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460297] Review Request: apricots - 2D air combat game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460297 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 12:54:48 EDT --- apricots-0.2.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458610] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 12:53:50 EDT --- php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql-1.4.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460244] Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460244 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:03:23 EDT --- alt-ergo-0.8-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452078] Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 12:58:30 EDT --- node-0.3.2-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459073] Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459073 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:03:32 EDT --- pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pyvnc2swf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7874 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 12:57:41 EDT --- Maybe cause I hadn't gotten round to doing the cvsadmin request yet? :) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: eigen2 Short Description: A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math Owners: rdieter Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:00:45 EDT --- python-paver-0.8.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461097] Review Request: hunspell-gu - Gujarati hunspell dictionary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461097 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452805] Review Request: ember - WorldForge client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452805 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:10:11 EDT --- REVIEW == Good: - rpmlint checks return: ember.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ember/ogre.cfg ember.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ember/resources.cfg ember.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ember/terrain.cfg Documented why you didn't do this, safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv3+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (f5d94ac46131bcf0bb7788e311331aac523287b8) - package compiles on devel (x86_64, koji scratch) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - desktop file ok Nice job with this package, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446102] Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446102 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:08:45 EDT --- xdialog-2.3.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452078] Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:08:18 EDT --- node-0.3.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455989] Review Request: xfce-mcs-plugins-extra - Extra plugins for the Xfce mcs manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455989 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:10:32 EDT --- xfce-mcs-plugins-extra-2.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455989] Review Request: xfce-mcs-plugins-extra - Extra plugins for the Xfce mcs manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455989 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:04:40 EDT --- xfce-mcs-plugins-extra-2.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459073] Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459073 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:02:53 EDT --- iok-1.0.8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455989] Review Request: xfce-mcs-plugins-extra - Extra plugins for the Xfce mcs manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455989 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:00:31 EDT --- perl-File-LibMagic-0.85-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:18:50 EDT --- python-paver-0.8.1-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461097] Review Request: hunspell-gu - Gujarati hunspell dictionary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461097 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 12:57:30 EDT --- hunspell-gu-20061015-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436330] Review Request: libtrash - Libraries to move files to a trash-folder on delete
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436330 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:19:29 EDT --- libtrash-3.2-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:57:40 EDT --- Some remarks: ! iconv script - Not a blocker, however would you write them shorter like below? --- %setup -q for f in \ CHANGES COPYRIGHT TODO nxtvepg.1 do iconv -f ISO-8859-15 -t UTF-8 $f $f.new touch -c -r $f $f.new mv -f $f.new $f done --- * optflags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags You can check what flags are used by $ rpm --eval %optflags * app-defaults directory - I guess we should use %_datadir/X11/app-defaults as app-defaults directory * On my system %_sysconfdir/X11/app-defaults is not owned by any packages * Also there are no files under %_sysconfdir/X11/app-defaults * Desktop file --- 206 + desktop-file-install --vendor=fedora --dir=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nxtvepg-2.8.0-2.fc10.i386/usr/share/applications /builddir/b uild/SOURCES/nxtvepg.desktop 207 /builddir/build/SOURCES/nxtvepg.desktop: key Categories is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character, fixing --- - Category line should be Categories=AudioVideo;. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461976] New: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-ImageView - Perl bindings to the GtkImageView image viewer widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-ImageView - Perl bindings to the GtkImageView image viewer widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461976 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-ImageView - Perl bindings to the GtkImageView image viewer widget Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Gtk2-ImageView.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Gtk2-ImageView-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Perl bindings to the GtkImageView image viewer widget. Find out more about GtkImageView at http://trac.bjourne.webfactional.com/. The Perl bindings follow the C API very closely, and the C reference should be considered the canonical documentation. Note: You'll need this updated perl-Glib package to build/use this: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=820825 Accordingly, this is a rawhide only item (F10+). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 Bug 441378 depends on bug 461565, which changed state. Bug 461565 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Grammar - Grammar-based, user-friendly config parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461565 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461565] Review Request: perl-Config-Grammar - Grammar-based, user-friendly config parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461565 Terje Røsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Terje Røsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 14:07:20 EDT --- Pending in bohdi for F-8 and F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461491] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461491 Terje Røsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Terje Røsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 14:09:53 EDT --- Pending in bodhi for F-8 and F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459880] Review Request: anyremote2html - WEB interface for anyRemote
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459880 --- Comment #15 from anyremote [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 14:08:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) One issue: * autotool automated call Fixed. New SRPM http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote2html-0.5.2.2-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC file http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote2html.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460244] Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460244 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:14:09 EDT --- alt-ergo-0.8-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:18:38 EDT --- gadmin-squid-0.1.0-0.4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #20 from John Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 14:10:38 EDT --- I've confirmed with upstream they're now on GPL3+ and adjusted the SPEC accordingly. Also fixed the warning. On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:53 AM, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hereby confirm that Gnome-RDP is now being released under the terms of GNU General Public License v3 or, at your option, any later version. http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/gnome-rdp.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/gnome-rdp-0.2.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225615] Merge Review: binutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225615
Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 14:14:55 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=316467)
-- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316467)
Proposed changes.
Changes attached, scratch build at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=820452
(In reply to comment #1)
binutils.src:20: W: prereq-use /sbin/install-info
The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires
is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post),
Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq.
Fixed:
+Requires(post): /sbin/install-info
+Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info
binutils.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes gnupro
The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all
older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update
problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it
was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if
possible.
Fixed:
+Obsoletes: gnupro = 1117-1
binutils.src:303: W: macro-in-%changelog _prefix
Not fixed as it was already used with single or double % case-by-case
appropriately. One should see during `rpm -q --changelog'
- fix multilib conflict in /usr/include/bfd.h
and not:
- fix multilib conflict in %{_prefix}/include/bfd.h
binutils.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch4:
binutils-2.18.50.0.3-ia64-lib64.p
A patch is applied inside an %ifarch block. Patches must be applied
on all architectures and may contain necessary configure and/or code
patch to be effective only on a given arch.
Not a problem.
Not fixed, source tree is already arch-dependent as I was told by Roland
McGrath.
binutils.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A GNU collection of binary utilities.
Summary ends with a dot.
Fixed.
Why are the .a files not in a -static package? What would be the
ramifications
of correcting this?
libiberty.a should be in fact removed as it should not be used by anyone as
packages using libiberty have it bundled and build it on their own.
libbfd.a and libopcodes.a are not ABI compatible across versions so their
shared (.so) counterparts are not intended for linking with 3rd party
applications - they are provided only for the binaries from this rpm.
3rd party applications link bfd/opcodes statically.
There is nothing left for a possible -static package.
(In reply to comment #2)
I think it would be better to change the perl substitution
to a sed substitution.
Not done, IMO the Perl regex syntax is more flexible and I find the sed syntax
obsoleted nowadays.
the gzipping of info files will be done automatically,
Fixed.
I suggest using
%defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root)
Changed (default directory attr; not in the scratch build).
Why not use %configure and why use %makeinstall?
Changed for %configure. There was a separate build directory before which I am
not aware how to configure while using %configure. But as I find the separate
build directory more as an inconvenience than advantage and the practical
reasons for it (gasp) no longer exist I changed it for a unified build/source
directory back again and so even using %configure.
(In reply to comment #5)
binutils.src:157: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options
must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script
supports it.
This is a rpmlint error, --libdir is there but rpmlint did not parse it right
through the %if blocks.
Thanks, if it is fine going to commit it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442377] Review Request: python-pysctp - Python binding for the SCTP network protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442377 Neil Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458610] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:19:09 EDT --- pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pyvnc2swf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7983 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225615] Merge Review: binutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225615 Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #7 from Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 14:17:17 EDT --- IIRC assignee should be the reviewer, not the maintainer, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461976] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-ImageView - Perl bindings to the GtkImageView image viewer widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461976 --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 14:22:18 EDT --- I didn't see that one, apologies. Jesse Keating pointed out that we had broken dependencies in rawhide, so I whipped up a package to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #21 from Christoph Wickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 15:03:28 EDT --- All (In reply to comment #20) I've confirmed with upstream they're now on GPL3+ and adjusted the SPEC accordingly. That was my guess as well. gnome-rdp-0.2.3-2.fc10.src.rpm fixes all outstanding issues, so this package is APPROVED. Now it's time for the CVSAdmin procedure and to request membership to the packager group in the accounts system, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 --- Comment #6 from Miloslav Trmac [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 15:05:25 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: fwknop New Branches: F-9 Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461991] New: rhm-examples review request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: rhm-examples review request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461991 Summary: rhm-examples review request Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora http://people.apache.org/~tross/rhm-examples-0.2.656926-6.fc9.src.rpm Source code examples for RHM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461358] Review Request: weplab - Analyzing WEP encryption security on wireless networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461358 Christoph Wickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 15:11:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) add Requires: wireless-tools The decision to add the requirement for wireless-tools is up to you. No need to make another release or do a scratch build for this, because the package was already approved. I have sponsored you, so it's time for the CVSAdmin procedure now: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452806] Review Request: ember-media - media files for the ember
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452806 --- Comment #5 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 15:28:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316476) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316476) spec changes to cleanup rpmlint failures -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 15:32:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461619] Review Request: system-switch-displaymanager - A display manager switcher for GDM, KDM, XDM and WDM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461619 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 15:33:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452806] Review Request: ember-media - media files for the ember
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452806 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #6 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 15:39:58 EDT --- I've attached a diff between your last spec file, and one I edited to fix the rpmlint errors: This review is against the fixed spec and SRPM. Please make those changes before committing. Good: - rpmlint checks return: ember-media.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/ember/media/shared/common/themes/ember/gui/fonts/VeraBd.ttf ../../../../../../../../fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.ttf ember-media.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/ember/media/shared/common/themes/ember/gui/fonts/Vera.ttf ../../../../../../../../fonts/bitstream-vera/Vera.ttf ember-media.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/ember/media/shared/core/Vera.ttf ../../../../fonts/bitstream-vera/Vera.ttf These are safe to ignore, because you have Requires: bitstream-vera-fonts - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv2+ or GFDL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (1bd54d49063505c63ea9f4548711749b7e75a553) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - content okay - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Please be sure you make my changes before you commit, but this is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 15:40:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461358] Review Request: weplab - Analyzing WEP encryption security on wireless networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461358 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 15:59:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: weplab Short Description: Analyzing WEP encryption security on wireless networks Owners: fab Branches: F-8 F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
