[Bug 470914] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 02:10:48 EDT --- Let's wait a couple days more. We'll close the bug if we don't get any response and then I'll open a new one. Michael, would you like to re-review this package in case we don't get a reply? And could you attach or email me the SPEC file if you still have it in your archives? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491579] New: Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 Summary: Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fed...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jjack.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jjack-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: JJack is a JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API and a framework for the Java programming language that allows Java applications to use the JACK Audio Connection Kit. Audio processor clients can be designed to: * create their own sounds (as a synthesizer or sample-player) * change the sound-output of other clients (e.g. as an effects-device) * analyse the audio streams generated by other clients (e.g. display the wave form) rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491491] Review Request: python-Jinja - A sandboxed python templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491491 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||panem...@gmail.com Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 02:22:34 EDT --- Package already in Fedora http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5935 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491240] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491240 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 02:28:35 EDT --- unable to download Source tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461050] Review Request: tucnak2 - VHF contest logging program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461050 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491491] Review Request: python-Jinja - A sandboxed python templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491491 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-03-23 02:47:35 EDT --- Great, thanks :). Sorry for not doing my homework on that one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491581] New: Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581
Summary: Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis
Encoder
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: oget.fed...@gmail.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jVorbisEnc.spec
SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jVorbisEnc-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description:
JVorbis is a music encoder, which compresses high quality audio format
(44.1-48.0kHz, 16+ bit, polyphonic).
rpmlint:
jVorbisEnc.src:93: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
This one is a false alarm. The package is not noarch.
jVorbisEnc.x86_64: W: no-documentation
Nothing we can do. There is no documentation in the source tarball, except the
javadoc we produce.
Package fails to build in ppc64:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1253732
I don't know if this is fixable. Any help will be appreciated.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190
--- Comment #47 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-03-23 02:51:59 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #46)
So here's first crack at the official review (sorry that it took so long):
1.) Source files
Please comment on how did you get these:
You mean comment where I got it in the spec file?
Exactly. Like:
# Get revision 1234 from SVN:
# svn co -r1234 http://repoistory-...@1234 dosbox
# tar --exclude .svn -czf dosbox.tar.gz dosbox
Isn't etc/dosemu.xpm from the source tarball sufficient?
Source3:%{name}.xpm
I think I got that idea from the dosbox spec file, I can change it if
necessary.
Yup. Just droop the Source3 and replace %{SOURCE3} with etc/dosemu.xpm
2.) FreeDOS image
I don't believe this is formally allowed (shipping binaries), though other
packages do this (say, qemu includes bochs bios image). I'll ask on
packaging
list how to deal with this and let you know.
ok, I guess I overlooked it as shipping binaries because it was just a freedos
image. I hope it will be ok.
I guess so as well. I've just sent a message:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-March/msg00053.html
I have uploaded the latest RPM packages and spec file here:
http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu.spec
Seems fine. Thanks for resolving those issues, let's do the rest (and... wait
for the reply to the binary image issue).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #48 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-03-23 02:54:59 EDT --- One more issue. In the .desktop entry you say: Exec=dosemu -s which does not seem to make much sense (you'll probably notice why :). Please replace with Exec=xdosemu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490867] Review Request: perl-Date-ICal - Perl extension for ICalendar date objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490867 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 02:58:10 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1253718 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 69e10541f5da09fc0f53474073da6744 Date-ICal-1.72.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=742, 6 wallclock secs ( 0.24 usr 0.01 sys + 5.58 cusr 0.05 csys = 5.88 CPU) + Package perl-Date-ICal-1.72-1.fc11.noarch = Provides: perl(Date::ICal) = 1.72 perl(Date::ICal::Duration) = 1.61 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Date::ICal::Duration) perl(Date::Leapyear) perl(Time::Local) perl(integer) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490867] Review Request: perl-Date-ICal - Perl extension for ICalendar date objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490867 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2009-03-23 03:06:28 EDT --- Thanks for the review Parag. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Date-ICal Short Description: Perl extension for ICalendar date objects Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489293] Review Request: kvkbd - Virtual keyboard for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489293 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 03:15:14 EDT --- Yes, it's in stable repository rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - Qt bindings for Qt Script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 03:13:18 EDT --- Hello. This is needed for the next amarok release, right? I downloaded qt-4.5.0-8.fc11 (and the corresponding qt-devel, qt-x11) from koji and tried to build qtscriptgenerator against them with mock (rawhide). The build fails with -- cd qtscript_phonon/ make -f Makefile make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/qtscriptgenerator-src-0.1.0/qtbindings/qtscript_phonon' make -f Makefile.Release make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/qtscriptgenerator-src-0.1.0/qtbindings/qtscript_phonon' make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../../generated_cpp/com_trolltech_qt_phonon/main.cpp', needed by `release/main.o'. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/qtscriptgenerator-src-0.1.0/qtbindings/qtscript_phonon' make[1]: *** [release] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/qtscriptgenerator-src-0.1.0/qtbindings/qtscript_phonon' make: *** [sub-qtscript_phonon-make_default] Error 2 - It looks like there's something wrong. Do I need to download anything else from koji? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491550] Review Request: libass - Portable library for SSA/ASS subtitles rendering
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491550 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 03:40:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Full review: Thanks for the review. Just one small issue: Redundant BuildRequires: glibc-devel (required by gcc, which is in exceptions) freetype-devel (required by fontconfig-devel) These two slipped my mind. Thanks for pointing it out. I also encourage you to work with avidemux maintainer (in RPM Fusion) to unbundle its internal copy of libass. Will do. IIRC mplayer also carries its iternal copy of libass. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491550] Review Request: libass - Portable library for SSA/ASS subtitles rendering
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491550 Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 03:43:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libass Short Description: Portable library for SSA/ASS subtitles rendering Owners: mso Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 04:20:59 EDT --- hi, this is what i got for the licensing, please advise.. As I stated in my previous email, the license is included in the font headers. You may verify this with the following command: grep -a -B 6 -A 84 'SIL OPEN FONT LICENSE' *.ttf This is the standard way that the OFL is attached to fonts, and it's how my other fonts that have already been packaged for Fedora have been licensed. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|loupgaroubl...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||powwow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #35 from _pjp_ pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in 2009-03-23 05:03:24 EDT --- Hello all, It's a pleasure to announce the second release of `djbdns' I've been working on. Please have a look at: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns And for package review SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns.spec SORC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.2.tar.gz SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470914] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-03-23 05:02:38 EDT --- http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/fedora/linux/planetccrma/10/SRPMS/slv2-0.6.2-1.fc10.ccrma.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491521] Review Request: Hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491521 --- Comment #5 from Alex Orlandi nyr...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 05:12:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Thanx you Alex. I'll check the warning and try to contact the current maintainer. I think that is the right thing. Is tere any possibilty on getting this accepted as a backport then? 0.9.10 is due to be released soon (possibly month or two). I think is possibile but probably the better thing to do is to talk to the package maintainer (see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/hedgewars) Sorry if the question is a bit unfortunate, but I'm still new to Fedora package sumbiting system and I'm still not at ease with it. No problem. Anyway, if you like to maintain some new package I suggest you to read carefully the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join and the related links: there are a lot of useful information. Bye. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478384] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-mini - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478384 Aleksey Lim alsr...@altlinux.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Aleksey Lim alsr...@altlinux.org 2009-03-23 05:52:49 EDT --- since all honey activities should be installed from ASLO and distros provide only http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Sugar_Platform/0.84 I'm closing this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478385] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-synthlab - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478385 Aleksey Lim alsr...@altlinux.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Aleksey Lim alsr...@altlinux.org 2009-03-23 05:52:08 EDT --- since all honey activities should be installed from ASLO and distros provide only http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Sugar_Platform/0.84 I'm closing this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481513] Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481513 Bug 481513 depends on bug 478382, which changed state. Bug 478382 Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478382 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478382] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478382 Bug 478382 depends on bug 478381, which changed state. Bug 478381 Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478385] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-synthlab - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478385 Bug 478385 depends on bug 478381, which changed state. Bug 478381 Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478384] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-mini - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478384 Bug 478384 depends on bug 478381, which changed state. Bug 478381 Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478383] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-jam - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478383 Bug 478383 depends on bug 478381, which changed state. Bug 478381 Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478382] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478382 Aleksey Lim alsr...@altlinux.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Aleksey Lim alsr...@altlinux.org 2009-03-23 05:53:55 EDT --- since all honey activities should be installed from ASLO and distros provide only http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Sugar_Platform/0.84 I'm closing this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478383] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-jam - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478383 Aleksey Lim alsr...@altlinux.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Aleksey Lim alsr...@altlinux.org 2009-03-23 05:53:30 EDT --- since all honey activities should be installed from ASLO and distros provide only http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Sugar_Platform/0.84 I'm closing this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478381] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 Aleksey Lim alsr...@altlinux.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Aleksey Lim alsr...@altlinux.org 2009-03-23 05:54:19 EDT --- since all honey activities should be installed from ASLO and distros provide only http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Sugar_Platform/0.84 I'm closing this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478365] Review Request: perl-Verilog-CodeGen - Verilog code generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478365 --- Comment #12 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2009-03-23 06:32:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Strange. Try now, I think it's working... not sure what happened there. ;( https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/index/perl-Verilog* lists perl-Verilog -- Verilog parsing routines perl-Verilog-Codegen -- Verilog code generator perl-Verilog-Readmem -- Parse Verilog $readmemh or $readmemb but doesn't list perl-Verilog-CodeGen (Note: *-CodeGen vs. *-Codegen) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491084] Review Request: medusa - parallel brute forcing pasword cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491084
--- Comment #13 from Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 06:39:39
EDT ---
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/i586, devel/x86_64, devel/ppc, devel/ppc64
[!] Rpmlint output: empty
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv2
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: 82f884666161af80f8cee7a7d5c7554d
medusa-1.5.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: koji scratch build
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on:koji scratch build
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[-] %check is present and the tests pass
So the zero length NEWS file is only remaining problem.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491084] Review Request: medusa - parallel brute forcing pasword cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491084 --- Comment #12 from Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 06:16:10 EDT --- I hate to say it, but ... yes rpmlint is silent on src.rpm, but ... $ rpmlint medusa-1.5-4.fc11.i586.rpm medusa.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/medusa-1.5/NEWS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491240] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491240 --- Comment #6 from Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 06:51:32 EDT --- sorry, built it on an F-10, rather than F-9 System. My bad. New links below: Spec URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/d/r/dropwatch/dropwatch.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/d/r/dropwatch/dropwatch-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486390] Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390 --- Comment #17 from Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com 2009-03-23 06:56:52 EDT --- new version of rcssserver3d requires simspark, so I wonder if it is possible to build the new version of rcssserver3d for F-10/9 before simspark appears in the repositories. Anyway, there should be no problem installing the current version of rcssserver3d if the user don't install simspark. BTW, I will update rcssserver3d today, so it should not be a big problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491240] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491240 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 07:03:21 EDT --- But how can I download source used to build this package? wget https://fedorahosted.org/releases/d/r/dropwatch/dropwatch-1.0.tar.gz gave ERROR 404: Not Found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #3 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 07:03:26 EDT --- Please, one question. How long are usually waiting for sponsor? Thx Zarko -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||mingw32-libglademm24 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491614] New: Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade Alias: mingw-libglademm24 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libglademm24.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the glade library. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|mingw-libglademm24 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491240] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491240 --- Comment #9 from Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 07:10:20 EDT --- Thats odd, I'm sorry. My makefiles must have been messed up. The source tarball is there now: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/d/r/dropwatch/dropwatch-1.0.tbz2 Note its dropwatch-1.0.tbz2, not .tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491240] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491240 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 07:08:42 EDT --- sorry I mean to say https://fedorahosted.org/releases/d/r/dropwatch/dropwatch-1.0.tbz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||491616(mingw32-zfstream) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||438588 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-03-23 07:13:04 EDT --- Note: the review request for the native version of this library is still pending, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491618] New: Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library Alias: mingw32-libsqlite3x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-5.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491616] New: Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O Alias: mingw32-zfstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-zfstream.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-zfstream-20041202-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491617] New: Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 Alias: mingw32-libxml++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libxml++.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libxml++-2.24.2-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491240] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491240 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 07:14:48 EDT --- reverifying source tarball with packaged tarball in SRPM c1e73c91dcb8bdb10eb41767e2007a7c dropwatch-1.0.tbz2 7cdb49fa2e16847a032a98abffc26481 ../SOURCES/dropwatch-1.0.tbz2 md5sum failed to verify tarball. Can you please remove srpm and again tarball with same name from tarball dropwatch-1.0.tbz2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486390] Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390
--- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-23
07:26:07 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
new version of rcssserver3d requires simspark, so I wonder if it is possible
to
build the new version of rcssserver3d for F-10/9 before simspark appears in
the
repositories.
Well, actually it is possible
- Ask rel-eng team (i.e. create a ticket on
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ ) to get simspark tagged as
dist-f{9,10}-override
Example:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1065
- After tagging is done by rel-eng team, simspark is added to koji buildroot,
however still it is not pushed into stable repository
- After rebuilding new rcssserver3d against simspark is done,
you can submit a push request on bodhi for simspark and rcssserver3d
as one set.
- After simspark and new rcssserver3d are tagged as dist-f{9,10}-updates,
you should ask rel-eng team to remove dist-f{9,10}-override tag.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490520] Review Request: ioport - Access I/O ports
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490520 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 07:33:03 EDT --- Imported into Rawhide F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - Qt bindings for Qt Script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-03-23 07:31:30 EDT --- odd, it built for me locally, I'll try a new scratch build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490520] Review Request: ioport - Access I/O ports
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490520 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-23 07:34:23 EDT --- ioport-1.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ioport-1.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490704] Review Request: mingw32-liboil - MinGW Windows liboil library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490704 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 07:37:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) for #5 where does this Auto-buildrequires comes from? auto-buildrequires is now (or very shortly will be) in EPEL 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - Qt bindings for Qt Script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-03-23 07:34:07 EDT --- In the meantime, you could try http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/qtscriptgenerator/qtscriptgenerator-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm which omits the problematic phonon bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - Qt bindings for Qt Script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jrez...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - Qt bindings for Qt Script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-03-23 07:52:28 EDT --- %changelog * Mon Mar 23 2009 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 0.1.0-3 - BR: phonon-devel Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/qtscriptgenerator/qtscriptgenerator.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/qtscriptgenerator/qtscriptgenerator-0.1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1253957 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128
--- Comment #4 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-03-23
07:56:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Please, one question.
How long are usually waiting for sponsor?
Thx
Zarko
There is no set time. (I am not allowed to sponsor)
I have just checked the new spec + srpm and noticed the application installs
icons into %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor , this means the icon caches must be
updated so that the installed icons show up in menus right after package
installation.
I also checked the desktop file and it contains mime info.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database
You will need to add this after the %clean section
%post
touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then
%{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || :
fi
update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime /dev/null || :
%postun
touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then
%{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || :
fi
update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime /dev/null || :
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - Qt bindings for Qt Script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-03-23 08:15:19 EDT --- %changelog * Mon Mar 23 2009 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 0.1.0-4 - include qsexec Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/qtscriptgenerator/qtscriptgenerator.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/qtscriptgenerator/qtscriptgenerator-0.1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1254267 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487421] Review Request: libyaml - YAML 1.1 parser and emitter written in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487421 John Eckersberg jecke...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from John Eckersberg jecke...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 08:31:37 EDT --- Yes certainly, I thought I had already closed it. Closing it now. Thanks for all your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225945] Merge Review: jfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225945 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 08:40:59 EDT --- All fixed in devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #49 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-03-23 08:38:27 EDT --- Bad news :( Seems like FreeDOS can be built with Watcom C and Borland C Compiler only, both of which are non-free. Building with dev86's bcc is most likely not possible now. Do you think DOSEmu package would actually be usable without the FreeDOS image shipped? I'm wondering if you are in touch with upstream of either FreeDOS, or DOSEmu so that you could ask whether anyone's willing to help switching to free build framework (dev86) and whether there are any known technical difficulties with it? See the thread here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-March/thread.html#00053 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226376] Merge Review: rootfiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226376
--- Comment #2 from Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 08:40:55 EDT
---
- %{?dist} has already been added in a recent version
- Added the we-are-upstream comments above the sources
- Added the -p option to the install command to preserve timestamps
rootfiles-8.1-4 should contain all the requested fixes and has just been built
in rawhide.
Thanks regards, Phil
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #5 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 09:00:02 EDT --- OK, I fixed this, too. :) Here are the files: Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SPECS/photoprint.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SRPMS/photoprint-0.4.0-3.fc10.src.rpm BTW, many thanks to helping me at my first package. You are very kind. Your SPEC's suggestions (tips) are very useful to me. regards, Zarko -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488359] Review Request: dcbd - daemon and configuration tool for data center bridging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488359 Jan Zeleny jzel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Jan Zeleny jzel...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 09:26:11 EDT --- Package has been uploaded to CVS, closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491647] Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491647 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-03-23 09:42:50 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1254385 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491647] New: Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491647 Summary: Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/taglib-extras/taglib-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/taglib-extras/taglib-extras-0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Taglib-extras delivers support for reading and editing the meta-data of audio formats not supported by taglib, including: asf, mp4v2, rmff, wav. Only parses/edits container metadata, no decoding, but may still have encumbrance issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491647] Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491647 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-03-23 09:43:21 EDT --- Blocking FE-legal, pending legal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 09:49:11 EDT --- I'm going to say this falls on the acceptable side of the trademark line. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491647] Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491647 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 09:53:43 EDT --- Looks like this is just tagging and meta-data. I'm going to say this is permissable based on my current understanding of the legal space. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491650] New: Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491650 Summary: Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: d...@danny.cz QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/s390/libica.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/s390/libica-2.0-1.el5.src.rpm Description: A library of functions and utilities for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries. koji scratch build: https://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19585 rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226412] Merge Review: setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226412 --- Comment #5 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 10:06:30 EDT --- Thanks for review, accidently I was not on CC after I got that package under maintainance, so sorry for late response. will contact rpmlint maintainer as those files should really be in rpmlint exceptions list. I added basic one-minute-work starting page instead of Trac page, fixed Source (and uploaded tarball on fedorahosted.org/releases/). License information was also added on starting page, as .spec file is part of tarball, I guess it's not needed to add license information into separate COPYING (or something like that) file - but if you feel it's worth of it, no problem, I could create such file and ship it as %doc file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225945] Merge Review: jfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225945
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|RAWHIDE |
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-03-23 10:10:57
EDT ---
.. Not so fast! I didn't do the review yet, or approve the package!
- Please use %configure instead of ./configure. If you
%global _sbindir /sbin
you can use plain %configure and %{_sbindir}/* in the files section.
The review as follows:
- source files match upstream:
* Tarball matches upstream, but
MUST: Source URL is missing!
X package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
X specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
X dist tag is present.
X build root is correct.
X license field matches the actual license.
X license is open source-compatible.
- license text included in package.
MUST: Missing from documentation: AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS
X latest version is being packaged.
X BuildRequires are proper.
X compiler flags are appropriate.
X %clean is present.
X package builds in mock.
X package installs properly.
X debuginfo package looks complete.
X rpmlint is silent.
X final provides and requires are sane.
X no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
X owns the directories it creates.
X doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
X no duplicates in %files.
X file permissions are appropriate.
X no scriptlets present.
X code, not content.
X documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
X %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
X no headers.
X no pkgconfig files.
X no libtool .la droppings.
X no desktop files
Fix the above and I'll approve the package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491240] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491240 --- Comment #11 from Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 10:16:19 EDT --- sorry, stupid build environment glitch. New links to fix that: Spec URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/d/r/dropwatch/dropwatch.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/d/r/dropwatch/dropwatch-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm tarball: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/d/r/dropwatch/dropwatch-1.0.tbz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225945] Merge Review: jfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225945 --- Comment #10 from Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 10:21:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) .. Not so fast! I didn't do the review yet, or approve the package! - Please use %configure instead of ./configure. If you %global _sbindir /sbin Why is that needed? It should be done in the buildsys already... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 --- Comment #35 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 10:17:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) If someone wants to maintain the package: Did not find spec and srpm from #25, redid the whole thing: spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/trash-cli/trash-cli.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/trash-cli/trash-cli-0.11.0-1.r199.fc10.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1241694 why won't you file the packagereview and maintain the package yourself? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 --- Comment #36 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 10:20:18 EDT --- [ma...@viklef trash-cli-0.11.0]$ trash-list Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/trash-list, line 21, in module from trashcli.trash import trashcan File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trashcli/trash.py, line 42, in module from .filesystem import Volume File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trashcli/filesystem.py, line 27, in module import unipath ImportError: No module named unipath [ma...@viklef trash-cli-0.11.0]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226412] Merge Review: setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226412 Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.sky...@iki.fi --- Comment #6 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 10:22:39 EDT --- Adding rpmlint maintainer to CC, to keep exception list discussion within that review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226376] Merge Review: rootfiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226376 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-03-23 10:20:08 EDT --- Review: X source files match upstream (we are upstream) X package meets naming and versioning guidelines. X specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X dist tag is present. X build root is correct. X license field matches the actual license. X license is open source-compatible. X license text not included upstream. X latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are appropriate. X %clean is present. X package builds in mock. X package installs properly. X debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires are sane: * Is ncurses really necessary?? X no check available X no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. X owns the directories it creates. X doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. X no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are appropriate. X no scriptlets present. X code, not content. X documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. X %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. X no headers. X no pkgconfig files. X no libtool .la droppings. X no desktop files I don't think the ncurses requirement should be there, since the bug only affects older distributions. Maybe add a conditional for older distros that are affected by the bug? On the other hand, this would make the spec unnecessarily complicated. In any case, add a note about the ncurses requirement so that it may be dropped in the future. The package has been found to adhere to the guidelines and is thus APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225945] Merge Review: jfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225945 --- Comment #12 from Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 10:26:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #9) .. Not so fast! I didn't do the review yet, or approve the package! - Please use %configure instead of ./configure. If you %global _sbindir /sbin Why is that needed? It should be done in the buildsys already... Because by default _sbindir is /usr/sbin. This redefinition makes the spec file cleaner, and is used in other system tool specs too. Yeah, noticed that. I'm not thrilled with overriding the macro though, so I'll just specify /sbin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225945] Merge Review: jfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225945 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-03-23 10:25:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #9) .. Not so fast! I didn't do the review yet, or approve the package! - Please use %configure instead of ./configure. If you %global _sbindir /sbin Why is that needed? It should be done in the buildsys already... Because by default _sbindir is /usr/sbin. This redefinition makes the spec file cleaner, and is used in other system tool specs too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225945] Merge Review: jfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225945
--- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-03-23 10:32:27
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
- license text included in package.
MUST: Missing from documentation: AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS
Sorry, disregard this. However, you can drop INSTALL and README from the
package as they are related to the compilation.
(In reply to comment #12)
Yeah, noticed that. I'm not thrilled with overriding the macro though, so
I'll
just specify /sbin.
OK, you can do that if you use %configure --sbindir=/sbin as mentioned above.
Also, please change %{_mandir}/*/* to %{_mandir}/man8/*, since if translations
appear then the package will end up owning system directories.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423
Traxtopel traxto...@fastmail.fm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||traxto...@fastmail.fm
--- Comment #7 from Traxtopel traxto...@fastmail.fm 2009-03-23 10:36:28 EDT
---
Did you find a workaround for the gdm_socket, this software still uses
#define GDM_SOCKET_PATH \
/var/run/gdm_socket G_SEARCHPATH_SEPARATOR_S \
/tmp/.gdm_socket
Without this being updated you cannot logout using the panel.
Should also be pre/post script added to spec.
%pre
if [ $1 -gt 1 ]; then
export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source`
gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule \
%{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/%{name}.schemas /dev/null || :
killall -HUP gconfd-2 || :
fi
%post
export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source`
gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule \
%{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/%{name}.schemas /dev/null || :
killall -HUP gconfd-2 || :
%preun
if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then
export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source`
gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule \
%{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/%{name}.schemas /dev/null || :
killall -HUP gconfd-2 || :
fi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225945] Merge Review: jfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225945 --- Comment #14 from Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 10:41:32 EDT --- Changes are in cvs now (except the INSTALL/README thing because I forgot it and it's not really that important). I'll wait before doing another build until I get the magic approval -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491201] Review Request: ninvaders - Space Invaders clone written in ncurses for cli gaming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491201 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-23 10:44:35 EDT --- ninvaders-0.1.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ninvaders-0.1.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491201] Review Request: ninvaders - Space Invaders clone written in ncurses for cli gaming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491201 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-23 10:44:40 EDT --- ninvaders-0.1.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ninvaders-0.1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226376] Merge Review: rootfiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226376 --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-03-23 10:46:53 EDT --- Maybe clear itself could be removed as well - and of course the ncurses requirements ( as discussed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223960 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429406) and rootfiles generally updated to comply with bash provided all-users-files in /etc/skel... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465858] Package Review: afpfs-ng - Apple Filing Protocol client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465858 Alex deVries alexthepuf...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexthepuf...@gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Alex deVries alexthepuf...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 11:01:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) While using this myself for some time I've found experience with this tool quite painful -- feels very Alpha and even experienced a couple of server-triggered crashes, which may be exploitable. Unless I'm only person using this I'm willing to work on this and improve it, otherwise I won't let it enter Fedora and will close this in some time. So please review this only if you're interested in using it :) I'm the author of afpfs-ng, and there definitely are stability problems with it. I am currently working on these bugs (mostly related to making it thread safe). That said, please report your afpfs-ng bugs so I can ensure that they are fixed. I'll leave it up to you to decide if you want to include it in FC10, but everyone will be happier with an upcoming release of afpfs-ng. - Alex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476346] Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476346 Bug 476346 depends on bug 491537, which changed state. Bug 491537 Summary: dynamic_bitset/dynamic_bitset.hpp won't compile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491537 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |MODIFIED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-23 11:34:08 EDT --- SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-10.fc10.src.rpm Fixed, and I moved closer to the template. I agree that this is getting old, but I'm learning font packaging as I go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490028] Review Request: python-tokyocabinet - Python bindings for Tokyo Cabinet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490028 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-23 11:44:05 EDT --- Some notes: * %define - %global - Now Fedora suggests to use %global instead of %define, especially for the nested macro definition. ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define (The latter one says Draft, however it is already accepted by FESCo). * Naming - Fedora prefers to use the tarball name as rpm name as much as possible. For this package I recommend to use pytc as rpm name. * Requires -- Requires: python = 2.3 Requires: tokyocabinet -- - Both of these are unnecessary. These dependencies are automatically pulled in by libraries' dependencies caught by rpmbuild itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-23 11:50:13 EDT --- flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486390] Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-23 11:48:25 EDT --- simspark-0.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489614] Review Request: perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin - Perl extension for MIT Kerberos 5 admin interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489614 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-23 11:51:24 EDT --- perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin-0.11-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486390] Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1-3.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-23 11:49:19 EDT --- rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rednotebook'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2892 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490996] Review Request: backup-light - A small backup bash utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490996 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-23 11:51:19 EDT --- backup-light-0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update backup-light'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-2906 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(my...@yahoo.com) | Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.5.1-11.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487901] Review Request: zikula - web-based CMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487901 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-23 11:53:24 EDT --- zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
