[Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 --- Comment #21 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-04-08 01:58:39 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479515] Review Request: Music Organizer - Music Organizer , organize your mp3, ogg, flac and mp4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479515 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-04-08 01:58:46 EDT --- Is this review dead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-04-08 01:58:11 EDT --- Is this review dead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #14 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 02:07:28 EDT --- bump! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #4 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 02:07:46 EDT --- bump! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #1 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 02:08:39 EDT --- bump! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #1 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 02:11:22 EDT --- bump -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #18 from Jan ONDREJ ondr...@salstar.sk 2009-04-08 02:17:39 EDT --- My review is still not complete, but rpmlint shows these errors/warnings. At least problems with my comments should be fixed. sems-conf_auth.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-conf_auth.i386: E: zero-length /etc/sems/etc/conf_auth.conf - try to add at least some comments to this file. An link to documentation can be useful for users. sems-gateway.i386: W: no-documentation sems-gsm.i386: W: no-documentation sems-ivr.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/sems/plug-in/log.py - please, consider, if this file should be executed directly or only included from other python script. For first situation add shebang, for second remove execute flag from this script. sems-mailbox.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-pin_collect.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-python.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/sems/plug-in/py_sems_log.py - same problem as above. sems-speex.i386: W: no-documentation sems.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 173, tab: line 1) - fix this sems.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: sems--openser_enable.diff - I think you can remove this patch, but if you need it for possible further usage, it's only a warning. Which version of openser is needed to use sems without this patch? Current fedora package is enough? 12 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Jan ONDREJ ondr...@salstar.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2009-04-08 02:20:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Approved. Waiting to install this kss :) Thank you for review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: kcometen4 Short Description: An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 Owners: nucleo Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Felix Schwarz felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Felix Schwarz felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.eu 2009-04-08 03:04:20 EDT --- Package built successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=97005 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #26 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-08 03:03:52 EDT --- Well, this is not post-release of 0.7.4 but actually a pre-relaease of 0.7.5. So the correct naming for Fedora would be: 0.7.5-0.1.20080407svn2487 A new release based on the same snapshot would become 0.7.5-0.2.20080407svn2487 and so on, the 0 as release number must be kept to indicate it's a pre-release. 0.7.5 final would become a normal 0.7.5-1 again. Fedora 11 will be released on May 26th, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-08 03:11:17 EDT --- Why not? The application resides in the tray normally and IMO tray apps should be autostarted. But I leave this up to Rahul. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #64 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-08 03:08:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #63) you want to update the description on the devel branch only? I think description gets updated from the package, but not sure how often or when. I can check on that if you like. Yeah, I think devel is enough, since IIUC the only place the pkgdb description is visible is pkgdb itself? OK, and Bugzilla. In any case, yum shows the info from the rpms, so for a user there's no difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-08 03:18:13 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-08 03:20:27 EDT --- mingw32-cairomm-1.6.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-cairomm-1.6.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-08 03:19:36 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #14 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-04-08 03:40:07 EDT --- Proposed fix of lib64: Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090406-2.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690
Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #17 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 04:03:17
EDT ---
Now everything seems fine. Here is the review:
+ rpmlint output without serious errors:
kvirc.x86_64: E: zero-length
/usr/share/kvirc/4.0/modules/caps/tool/sharedfilewindow
kvirc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/kvirc/4.0/modules/caps/tool/iograph
kvirc.x86_64: E: zero-length
/usr/share/kvirc/4.0/modules/caps/tool/filetransferwindow
kvirc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/kvirc/4.0/modules/caps/tool/logview
kvirc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/kvirc/4.0/modules/caps/action/url
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 0 warnings.
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ File, containing the text of the licenses for the package is included in
%doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source.
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported architecture (x86_64).
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ Spec file handles locales properly (%find_lang doesn't work here).
+ Package call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ The package does not designed to be relocatable.
+ A package owns all directories that it creates.
+ A package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissable content.
+ Does not contain large documentation files.
+ Includes only doc files in %doc.
+ No headers.
+ No static libraries.
+ The package does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files.
+ If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then
library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package.
+ No devel packages.
+ The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
+ Includes %{name}.desktop file. Properly installed with desktop-file-install.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}.
+ All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8.
+ Package builds in mock.
+ Package functions as described even with QT 4.5.
+ Scriptlets are sane.
This package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494503] Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175
--- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-04-08 04:04:31
EDT ---
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ibus-table-extraphrase.pc
It should be under _datadir like we did for ibus-table.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494501] Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494501 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494499] Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494499 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494498] Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494498 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491884] Review Request: atasm - 6502 cross-assembler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491884 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-04-08 04:31:21 EDT --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494497] Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494497 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491886] Review Request: xa - 6502/65816 cross-assembler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491886 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: xa -|Review Request: xa - |6502/65816 cross assembler |6502/65816 cross-assembler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494495] Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494495 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494494] Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494494 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492969] Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-08 04:47:30 EDT --- I tried to make a mock build on Fedora 10 of this package. It fails for both i386 and x86_64 with the following error during configure: configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old. Make sure it is in your PATH or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable to the full path to pkg-config. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LV2_CFLAGS and LV2_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. To get pkg-config, see http://pkg-config.freedesktop.org/. See `config.log' for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gW9MDo (%build) I added the update-testing repo to the mock config for the build, and the build requirements were picked up: DEBUG backend.py:554: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64-19081239177430616696239/root/ install 'lv2core-devel' DEBUG util.py:280: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64-19081239177430616696239/root/ install 'lv2core-devel' DEBUG util.py:256: DEBUG util.py:256: Package Arch Version Repository Size DEBUG util.py:256: DEBUG util.py:256: Installing: DEBUG util.py:256: lv2core-devel x86_64 3.0-2.fc10 updates-testing 9.2 k DEBUG util.py:256: Installing for dependencies: DEBUG util.py:256: lv2core x86_64 3.0-2.fc10 updates-testing11 k DEBUG util.py:256: Transaction Summary DEBUG util.py:256: DEBUG util.py:256: Install 2 Package(s) DEBUG util.py:256: Update 0 Package(s) DEBUG util.py:256: Remove 0 Package(s) DEBUG util.py:256: Total download size: 20 k DEBUG util.py:256: Installed: DEBUG util.py:256:lv2core-devel.x86_64 0:3.0-2.fc10 DEBUG util.py:256: Dependency Installed: DEBUG util.py:256:lv2core.x86_64 0:3.0-2.fc10 DEBUG util.py:319: Child returncode was: 0 However, the pkg-config tools was not installed in the mock environment. The reason seems to be a missing requires on pkgconfig in the lv2core-devel package currently in the testing repo. According to the packaging guidelines section 1.22.1: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must Requires: pkgconfig (for directory ownership and usability). [ell...@ellert ~]$ rpm -q --requires -p lv2core-devel-3.0-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm lv2core = 3.0-2.fc10 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-04-08 05:10:38 EDT --- Yes, the built-in test should be passed successfully. I will try to get in touch with upstream about this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #45 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 05:42:06 EDT --- Sorry, used the wrong title (if some script searches this then it wouldn't catch it, right?) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rear Short Description: Relax and Recover (ReaR) is a Linux Disaster Recovery framework Owners: gdha Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: gdha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726
--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-04-08
04:58:03 EDT ---
OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English.
The %description is British English. ;-)
FAIL - MUST: Not all build dependencies are listed in
BuildRequires: dbus-devel and desktop-file-utils are missing
This is the infamous Fedora pkg-config problem, where Requires.private in the
pkgconfig file is evaluated and suffers from a missing dependency on dbus-devel
(for dbus-1.pc). Normally, BR GConf2-devel would suffice.
--- gnote.spec.orig 2009-04-08 10:48:55.0 +0200
+++ gnote.spec 2009-04-08 10:50:09.0 +0200
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
%build
%configure --disable-schemas-install
-make %{?_smp_mflags}
+V=1 make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494820] New: Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Summary: Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ramkr...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools-8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Pytools is a big bag of things that are missing from the Python standard library. This is mainly a dependency of my other software packages, and is probably of little interest to you unless you use those. If you're curious nonetheless, here's what's on offer: * A ton of small tool functions such as len_iterable, argmin, tuple generation, permutation generation, ASCII table pretty printing, GvR's mokeypatch_xxx() hack, the elusive flatten, and much more. * Michele Simionato's decorator module * A time-series logging module, pytools.log. * Batch job submission, pytools.batchjob. * A lexer, pytools.lex. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489962] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-04-08 06:21:35 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: c6461663ae3ca88c3028ee9308add53764fab76b libhbalinux-1.0.7.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (LGPLv2). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - IMO the ldconfig call is useless, because the library will be dlopened as a plugin - rpmlint complains a bit libhbalinux.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 44) = false positive libhbalinux.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libhbaapi = the dependency is correct libhbalinux.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun mv = can be ignored libhbalinux.x86_64: E: use-tmp-in-%postun = the copy could be created in /etc instead of /tmp This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #13 from Ivan Efremov iefre...@unipro.ru 2009-04-08 06:28:35 EDT --- 1) license issue fixed 2) qmake and lrelease issues fixed 3) g++ 4.4 issue fixed 4) according to the document we must not use 'desktop-file-install'. Instead I use 'desktop-file-validate'. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files 5) libdir issue fixed New links: SPEC: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene.spec SRPM: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene-1.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494845] New: Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Summary: Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xdrfile.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xdrfile-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A small C-library for reading and writing trr and xtc files. The library is lightweight (no dependencies, portable) and can be incorporated in other software, because it is being distributed under the BSD license. The library also contains one program trr2xtc which does what you would expect, and the other way around. rpmlint output: xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/README xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/ChangeLog xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/AUTHORS xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/COPYING xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/NEWS xdrfile-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #30 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2009-04-08 06:50:21 EDT --- 1.) Why your release jumps from -2 to -5? I did a few internal builds to test. 2.) Don't you think the URL should be http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/debmirror.html Agreed, I changed that. 3.) Why are you not using the name macro instead of the name in the whole specfile? Fixed as well. New version: SPEC: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror.spec SRPM: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror-20070123-7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492125] Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125
Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-08
06:52:07 EDT ---
The updated package builds in mock (Fedora 10) and its sources match upstream:
fa0f44c37499433455857becad4bbcda pangomm-2.24.0.tar.bz2
fa0f44c37499433455857becad4bbcda SRPM/pangomm-2.24.0.tar.bz2
The rest of the review in comment 1 still applies.
There is a tiny error in the specfile. The Source0 should be .../2.24/... not
.../2.14/... due to an oversight when the package was updated:
Source0:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pangomm/2.24/pangomm-%{version}.tar.bz2
But that can be fixed without having to send an updated version for me to
approve.
Package approved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-04-08 06:54:30 EDT ---
formal review is here, see the notes below:
OK source files match upstream:
60565a7c2b4b7c70056892b8c93d5de2d4d00d1e fcoe-utils-1.0.7.tar.gz
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
OK dist tag is present.
OK license field matches the actual license.
Ok license is open source-compatible (GPLv2). License text included in package.
OK latest version is being packaged.
OK BuildRequires are proper.
OK compiler flags are appropriate.
OK %clean is present.
OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
OK debuginfo package looks complete.
OK rpmlint is silent.
OK final provides and requires look sane.
N/A %check is present and all tests pass.
OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
BAD owns the directories it creates.
OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK no duplicates in %files.
OK file permissions are appropriate.
OK correct scriptlets present.
OK code, not content.
OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK no headers.
OK no pkgconfig files.
OK no libtool .la droppings.
OK not a GUI app.
- %{_sysconfdir}/fcoe and %{_sysconfdir}/fcoe/scripts directories are unowned,
add them with %dir directive
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 07:11:09 EDT --- Thanks Jussi. Ramakrishna, Can you resubmit package with correcting %description. I don't want you to increase release tag in SPEC for this minor change as I have not started yet review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-08 06:48:07 EDT --- Please change the EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) of your srpm every time you modify your srpm to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com 2009-04-08 07:20:27 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rpmreaper New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: mlichvar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Ramakrishna Reddy ramkr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-04-08 07:41:24 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 --- Comment #4 from Ramakrishna Reddy ramkr...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 07:45:01 EDT --- Thanks Jussi. ParagN, here is the corrected version of the SPEC and SRPM. Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools-8-1.fc11.src.rpm The newer description is as follows :: %description Pytools are a few interesting things that are missing from the Python Standard Library. Small tool functions such as :: * len_iterable, * argmin, * tuple generation, * permutation generation, * ASCII table pretty printing, * GvR's monkeypatch_xxx() hack, * The elusive flatten, and much more. * Michele Simionato's decorator module * A time-series logging module, pytools.log. * Batch job submission, pytools.batchjob. * A lexer, pytools.lex. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-04-08
07:47:44 EDT ---
* Most certainly you want the -static subpackage to require the -devel
subpackage instead of the main package.
%doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog INSTALL README
In case this is the standard INSTALL file, it is irrelevant to RPM package
users and typically is not included.
* Further, is it necessary to include the same %doc files in all three
packages? They are stored in three different doc directories.
* The pkgconfig file is tuned for static linking and relinks against libgsasl
and libgnutls. If you keep it like that, you're missing dependencies in the
-devel package for the corresponding -devel pkgs that contain those lib
symlinks:
$ cat vmime.pc|grep l[ib]*g
Requires: libgsasl
Libs: -L${libdir} -lvmime -lgsasl -lgnutls
$ rpm -qpR libvmime-0.9.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm |grep ^libg
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgnutls.so.26()(64bit)
libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4)(64bit)
libgsasl.so.7()(64bit)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Ramakrishna Reddy ramkr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494852] Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494853] New: Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Summary: Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ramkr...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-achoo.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-achoo-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Achoo is a fluent interface for unit testing Python objects. Achoo makes it easy to make assertions about the properties and behaviours of Python objects. For example, is this object equal to this other one? Does calling this function with these arguments raise an error? More Infomation on fluent from here http://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/FluentInterface.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-04-08 07:58:32 EDT --- Group: Applications/Productivity System Environment/Libraries %configure --enable-static=no Wrong or not recognised option it seems. Library is static-only, and as soon as it would build shared libs, build would fail anyway due to installed files not included in %files. %doc AUTHORS COPYING INSTALL README TODO In case this is the standard INSTALL file, it is irrelevant to RPM package users and typically is not included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #10 from Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com 2009-04-08 08:08:49 EDT --- I didn't do autostart but fixed rest of the issues. http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnote.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnote-0.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 08:11:52 EDT --- Any update on this review? It all builds fine in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1285122 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kle...@hp.com --- Comment #20 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-04-08 08:14:22 EDT --- latest version of pidgin-musictracker repackaged here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-08 08:14:32
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Currently there's no license included and two header files
specify the GPLv2+ license instead of BSD.
This asks for a licence clarification from upstream.
Yes, that's in the bug report I sent upstream.
# Move include files to %{_includedir} instead
mv %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name}/* %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}
rmdir %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name}
Better ask upstream for confirmation and a fix in the tarball. The headers
need
this change for 'include xdrfile.h' to work, but it changes the API because
users of this library can no longer #include xdrfile/xdrfile.h.
True. I suggested moving the headers in the same bug report. Now one just has
to wait until upstream reacts.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494857] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack
currently playing in your status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857
Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays
the musictrack currently playing in your status
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jan.kle...@hp.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker.spec
SRPM URL:
http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description: Musictracker is a plugin for Pidgin which displays the media
currently playing in the status message for any protocol Pidgin supports custom
statuses on.
My package review
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
[make...@fetaciq SPECS]$ rpmlint pidgin-musictracker.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[make...@fetaciq SPECS]$ rpmlint
../SRPMS/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[make...@fetaciq SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/
i386/ noarch/
[make...@fetaciq SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/pidgin-musictracker-*
pidgin-musictracker-static.i386: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
No documentation available for -static package
# MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
- ok
# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
- OK
# MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
- ok
# MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
- OK
# MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
- OK
# MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
- OK
# MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
- OK
# MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
- IMHO OK
# MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
- OK
# MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
- OK, builded on
uname -a
Linux fetaciq 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Mon Mar 23 23:37:54 EDT 2009
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
# MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
- OK
# MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden
- OK
# MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
- OK
# MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
- not relocatable package, OK
# MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
- OK
# MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
- OK
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
- OK, defattr() present
# MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
- OK
# MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
- imho OK
# MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
- ok
# MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
- OK, no large files present
# MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the
[Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #28 from Mikulas Patocka mpato...@redhat.com 2009-04-08 08:15:42 EDT --- I don't know anything about NSS, I thought that it is used by Mozilla and I didn't even know that other projects could be compiled against it. Dost the conversion mean only a recompile and relink? Or do I have to rewrite some of the code? I may try to compile Links with NSS, but even if it succeeds, you won't get good testing with NSS soon, Links always used OpenSSL and it is long-term tested with it, so if you want something proven stable, use OpenSSL. BTW. why do you want NSS instead of OpenSSL? Regarding that UTF-8 --- I have written most of it already for Links-2.3pre1, just have not released it yet. I could release it soon. Regarding the config script --- there is a bug that it selects hardcoded directories first and the user directory last. Easy to fix. Just keep in mind that the configure script must be generated with autoconf 2.13 --- that was current version 10 years ago when Links project was started and support for all the operating systems is tested with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-04-08
07:36:45 EDT ---
Currently there's no license included and two header files
specify the GPLv2+ license instead of BSD.
This asks for a licence clarification from upstream.
xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/README
xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/ChangeLog
xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/AUTHORS
xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/COPYING
xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/NEWS
Hint: There are ways to avoid this.
%prep
%setup ...
## Exit build if these %doc files become non-empty and are added to %files.
[ -s AUTHORS ] exit 1# exit if file has non-zero size
#[ -s AUTHORS ] || exit 1 # exit if file has zero size
[ -s COPYING ] exit 1
#[ -s COPYING ] || exit 1
%files
...
#doc AUTHORS
#doc COPYING
...
%post devel -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun devel -p /sbin/ldconfig
These are wrong and ought to be deleted.
# Move include files to %{_includedir} instead
mv %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name}/* %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}
rmdir %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name}
Better ask upstream for confirmation and a fix in the tarball. The headers need
this change for 'include xdrfile.h' to work, but it changes the API because
users of this library can no longer #include xdrfile/xdrfile.h.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490989] Review Request: subdownloader - A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490989 --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-04-08 08:19:47 EDT --- Hi Lubomir, my other package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494852] New: Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Summary: Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mma...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/astronomy-backgrounds/astronomy-backgrounds.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/astronomy-backgrounds/astronomy-backgrounds-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The astronomy-backgrounds package contains astronomy related artwork intended to be used as desktop background image. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #46 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-08 06:52:52 EDT --- Please set fedora-cvs flag to ? for CVS Request (the reason I don't do this for you is that I want to check if you can actually change fedora-cvs flag without error) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494852] Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494819] New: Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Summary: Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ramkr...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-bitarray.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-bitarray-0.3.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Bitarrays are sequence types and behave very much like usual lists. Eight bits are represented by one byte in contiguous block of memory. The user can select between two representations; little-endian and big-endian. Most of the functionality is implemented in C.Methods for accessing the machine representation are provided. This can be useful when bit level access to binary files is required, such as portable bitmap image files (.pbm). Also, when dealing with compressed data which uses variable bit length encoding you may find this module useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Ramakrishna Reddy ramkr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2009-04-08 05:28:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) Now everything seems fine. Here is the review: Thank you for review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: kvirc Short Description: KVIrc is a free portable IRC client Owners: nucleo Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-08 06:44:29 EDT --- I left in the empty files for the moment, since I'm waiting for a fix from upstream ( http://bugzilla.gromacs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312 ). Currently there's no license included and two header files specify the GPLv2+ license instead of BSD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494493] Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494493 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-04-08 05:12:00 EDT --- Jason, thanks for your input. I will try to update this package soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #15 from Ivan Efremov iefre...@unipro.ru 2009-04-08 08:29:13 EDT --- New links: SPEC: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene.spec SRPM: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene-1.4.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #47 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 07:03:07 EDT --- Oh dear - missed that one indeed - fedora-cvs has been set to ? now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-08 06:46:32 EDT --- The description is silly for an rpm, I'd remove most of the first paragraph altogether. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857
--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-08 08:37:42 EDT ---
1.) Don't disable the debug package
%define debug_package %{nil}
2.) Don't ship static libraries unless necessary
I bet here's no use of it. Probably configure accepts --disable-static
%package static
...
3.) Don't strip debugging information. See 1.)
strip src/.libs/musictracker.so
4.) Please add -f here
...so that short-circuited installs work
rm %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/pidgin/musictracker.la
5.) You don't need to specify dist tag in changelog
You may want to build a single spec file into multiple branches
* Wed Apr 9 2009 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 0.4.16-1.fc10
6.) Don't call ldconfig unless you're packaging a library
This DSO is just a plugin, not at the library location
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk AssignedTo|jussi.leht...@iki.fi|lkund...@v3.sk --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-08 08:39:12 EDT --- Jussi; I am going to steal this one, since I'm going to sponsor Jan. He just forgot to specify FE_NEEDSPONSOR, sorry for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|jussi.leht...@iki.fi| --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-08 06:47:38 EDT --- Parag, please remember to change the status to ASSIGNED whenever you take over a review.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 --- Comment #2 from Jan Zeleny jzel...@redhat.com 2009-04-08 07:33:25 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils-1.0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #22 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 05:15:58 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace-9.4a-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491240] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491240 Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-08 08:45:32 EDT --- Oh, dbus-devel is redundant. And you can probably drop the explicit Requires, since they should be picked up by rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-08 08:43:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Jussi; I am going to steal this one, since I'm going to sponsor Jan. He just forgot to specify FE_NEEDSPONSOR, sorry for that. Damn, I was just about to commit the same comments as you :D No problem, I was a bit wondering about the oddness of the packaging.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494862] New: Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 Summary: Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: d...@danny.cz QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/podofo.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/podofo-0.7.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: oDoFo is a library to work with the PDF file format. The name comes from the first letter of PDF (Portable Document Format). A few tools to work with PDF files are already included in the PoDoFo package. The PoDoFo library is a free, portable C++ library which includes classes to parse PDF files and modify their contents into memory. The changes can be written back to disk easily. The parser can also be used to extract information from a PDF file (for example the parser could be used in a PDF viewer). Besides parsing PoDoFo includes also very simple classes to create your own PDF files. All classes are documented so it is easy to start writing your own application using PoDoFo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #4 from Jan Blazek appoli...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 08:50:01 EDT --- Thanks for suggestions. New SPEC: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu.spec New SRPM: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu-3.9-3.fc10.src.rpm New mock log: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/build.log rpmlint doesn't have any complaints -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494339] Review Request: hyphen-hi - Hindi hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494339 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #5 from Jan Blazek appoli...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 08:52:17 EDT --- I've send the patch to upstream (mailing list) http://lists.suckless.org/dwm/0904/7801.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489962] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 Jan Zeleny jzel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jan Zeleny jzel...@redhat.com 2009-04-08 08:55:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libhbalinux Short Description: HBAAPI vendor library Owners: jzeleny Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 Jan Zeleny jzel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jan Zeleny jzel...@redhat.com 2009-04-08 08:57:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: fcoe-utils Short Description: Utilities for Fibre channel over ethernet Owners: jzeleny Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jussi.leht...@iki.fi| Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 --- Comment #1 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-04-08 09:13:23 EDT --- koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1285199 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-04-08 09:30:57 EDT --- updated spec/srpm file 1] done 2] static package removed, --disable-static used 3] when i have removed strip, rpmlint is complaining on pidgin-musictracker.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/pidgin/musictracker.so output of rpmbuild: http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker.build.log 4] done 5] done 6] ldconfig removed dbus-devel removed from BuildRequire Jussi you mean that all Requires could be removed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-04-08 09:47:33 EDT --- Still contains Requires: gtkmm24 (see bottom of comment 4) and: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491805] Review Request: django-sct - A collection of Django applications for building community websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491805 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 09:47:35 EDT --- Built for F-10 and Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494872] New: Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-ObjectDriver/perl-Data-ObjectDriver.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-ObjectDriver/perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.05-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Data::ObjectDriver is an object relational mapper, meaning that it maps object- oriented design concepts onto a relational database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #6 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-04-08 10:07:40 EDT --- updated spec/srpm available here: Spec URL: http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726
Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de
2009-04-08 10:11:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
This is the infamous Fedora pkg-config problem, where Requires.private in the
pkgconfig file is evaluated and suffers from a missing dependency on
dbus-devel
(for dbus-1.pc). Normally, BR GConf2-devel would suffice.
I have seen the error message too. Thanks a lot for your explanation and the
hint, Michael.
(In reply to comment #10)
I didn't do autostart but fixed rest of the issues.
Ok.
78d037b7591dc016546bc11e34afebd1 gnote-0.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm
fixes the outstanding issues:
OK - %files
OK - BuildRequires
OK - Requires: desktop-file-utils is not a requirement but a BuildReqiures
OK - Gconf2 for the scriptles:
OK - redundant BuildRequires: libxml2-devel dropped
OK - Using wildcards: %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/gnote.png
OK - Desktop file: --vendor= removed
Todo:
- Please drop Requires: gtkmm24 and let rpm pick up the libs automatically.
- %description not ending with a dot.
- If you use V=1 make %{?_smp_mflags} you don't need BuildRequires:
dbus-devel.
These issues are minor and can be fixed after import. This package is
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cassmod...@fedoraproject.or ||g Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492533] Review Request: Choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492533 --- Comment #4 from Tejas Dinkar tejasdin...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 10:18:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: choqok Short Description: KDE Twitter Client Owners: tejas Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: tejas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
