[Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491886] Review Request: xa - 6502/65816 cross-assembler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491886 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Dan Horák 2009-04-14 02:32:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xa Short Description: 6502/65816 cross-assembler Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491886] Review Request: xa - 6502/65816 cross-assembler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491886 --- Comment #4 from Dan Horák 2009-04-14 02:31:12 EDT --- Thanks for the review, the patches were sent to the upstream maintainer by personal email, comments will be added. I will talk to him about renaming the binary to xa65, it will not only lower the chance of conflict with some other tool, but also bring consistency with the other tools in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|oget.fed...@gmail.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-14
02:06:35 EDT ---
Okay, here is a more thorough review:
* rpmlint says:
dnsjava.src:106: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package)
This one is a false warning and can be ignored
dnsjava.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dnsjava-2.0.6/Changelog
We need to fix this. "iconv" will help.
! There are some example .java files in the root of the tarball. Their usage
are explained in the USAGE file. I think these .java files need to go to %doc
(of the main package). Alternatively, you can build them and put them in
%{_datadir}/%{name} or so. (You mention about these files in the %description
too)
* There is a tests directory. The README file mentions about building and
running these compile tests. We should make a %check section and run these
tests, if possible.
? Shouldn't the group tag be "System Environment/Libraries"?
! Since you are building the javadoc from source, you can remove the existing
doc/ directory in %prep
* README file says:
"dnsjava is placed under the BSD license. Several files are also under
additional licenses; see the individual files for details."
I found that the files org/xbill/DNS/Tokenizer.java,
org/xbill/DNS/ZoneTransferIn.java are licensed under MIT
This makes the license BSD and MIT
* This comment contains single % macro
#ant -Dj2se.javadoc=%{_javadocdir}/java clean docsclean dnssec jar docs
Do we need this comment?
! Also these comments are not needed. They can be removed:
#Epoch: 0
#Vendor:JPackage Project
#Distribution: JPackage
* This changelog entry contains single % macro
- In Source0 tag inject %%{name} and %{version} macroses.
(Also macroses->macros)
* "%attr(-,root,root)" is redundant in the line
%attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
I reported this to java folks a while ago. They still didn't fix this
guideline.
! In the description, please separate the paragraphs with blanks lines. It'll
look better.
* These BR's seem unnecessary: jce, java-javadoc
* BR: jpackage-utils is listed twice.
* You don't want to write "specific_version" in Requires. If you need to pull
openjdk-devel instead of gcj-devel, you can use something like >=1.7 or
>=1:1.6.0
* Also use the same number (>=1.7 or >=1:1.6.0) for Requires: java
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #16 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-14 01:37:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090406-3.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Lucian Langa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-14 01:31:09 EDT --- Thank you for the update. Please follow guidelines at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers gconf & scrollkeeper https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GConf https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets#Scrollkeeper You are still missing disttag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495436] Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-14 00:58:55 EDT --- Try now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Axel Thimm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||axel.th...@atrpms.net Bug 472639 depends on bug 464781, which changed state. Bug 464781 Summary: Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.d | |e | AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.d ||e Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #9 from Adam Miller 2009-04-14 00:15:02 EDT --- Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus-1.1.0-3.src.rpm I have applied the patches suggested, I also fixed my spec file as well as sent the requested email upstream and have CC'd you on it. I would like to thank you for the level of detail that you covered in your review thus far, it has been extremely informative and I appreciate the amount of time and effort you put into it. Looking forward to further review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-14 00:12:07 EDT --- I've taken Michael's suggestions: New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/libvmime.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/libvmime-0.9.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 00:04:35 EDT --- perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 00:04:30 EDT --- perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 00:03:28 EDT --- perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 00:03:23 EDT --- perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495436] Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-13 23:51:15 EDT --- Looks like something went wrong with cvs setup - no branch directories appear to have been created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-13 23:30:35 EDT --- My simple test for provides is that after installing, I should be able to use them: # yum install 'perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::DoNotSerialize)' $ perl -MMoose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::DoNotSerialize -e '' Can't locate Moose/Meta/Attribute/Custom/DoNotSerialize.pm in @INC It isn't particularly useful for rpm to provide things if they're not directly usable. Or is Moose able to make it available automagically? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-13 23:08:53 EDT --- http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-ObjectDriver/perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #2 from Sean Middleditch 2009-04-13 22:19:58 EDT --- Backed down to 0.11.2. I didn't mean that the svn made packaging more solid, just that I wanted to be ready for 0.12 and all of its changes, but not a big deal. This builds perfectly for me. I fixed the rpmlint errors (typos in copying from the guidelines that surprising didn't cause build to failure, didn't even realize they weren't right, sorry). New links below. Just gave the upstream pristine 0.11.2 tarball link, included the actual SRPM, and renamed my copy of the spec file just to make it clear for everyone that it's not the same as the non-Fedora .spec included in the upstream tarball. Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud.f11.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud-0.11.2-1.src.rpm TGZ URL: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-mud/0.11/gnome-mud-0.11.2.tar.gz rpmbuild output: elant...@localhost:~/Source/gnome-mud-11.2$ rpmlint gnome-mud.f11.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I double checked that rpmbuild -ba produces installable and usable binary packages and that rpmbuild --rebuild works properly on the resulting srpm. Also, as a side question, is there any place that better documents the guidelines for packaging GNOME applications? I copied the gconf and scrollkeeper bits from another package, but I don't know if what I copied is "best practice" or not. The build/install tricks for those two always were kind of horrid, but figured I'd ask. (I maintained the GNOME 2.0 desktop packages for Arch Linux years and years ago; I'm obviously rusty at this packaging business, not to mention Fedora packaging and RPM are totally new to me.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-13 22:17:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - summary matches upstream, but is poor English. Should be > "A serialization framework for Moose classes" (not "An...") Ugh. Thanks :) > Minor niggle with the summary. And you need to filter the provides: > perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 > perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 Hm. Why would we need to filter these? They're valid packages, even if Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::DoNotSerialize is in lib/MooseX/Storage/Meta/Attribute/Trait/DoNotSerialize.pm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #9 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-13 21:58:28 EDT --- The RPM packaging is now based on the pristine version 3.0.0 (http://downloads.sourceforge.net/soci/soci-3.0.0.tar.gz) of the SOCI project (http://soci.sourceforge.net). The updated files are: Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/opentrep/soci.spec?use_mirror=ovh SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/opentrep/soci-3.0.0-3.fc10.src.rpm?use_mirror=ovh * As the HTML documentation is present in the pristine tar-ball, I have kept the corresponding files, but converted them into Doxygen-generated documentation. And, as SourceForge teams require that their logo be present on the hosted Web site, I've added it in the sources. * Moreover, the general "GNU Autotools compatibility" patch could certainly be split into a few more specific patches, if needed. In fact, I first wanted to see whether I was back on the right track before pushing for some more refinements. * A full build has been made on Koji for i386 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1296097) and x86_64 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1296088) architectures. SRPMs can be fetched there as well. * rpmlint gives no error and no warning (on the specification file, as well as on source RPM and binary RPM packages). --- Thanks in advance for your feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #5 from arthurguru 2009-04-13 20:33:01 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback Jan. 1] Timestamps are now preserved. 2] Which "Source" are you referring to, the SRPM or the upstream source file xmlfy-1.4.2-src.tar.gz? If you use the upstream source the build will fail at the packaging - I use another top level Makefile "Makefile_src_archive" to build the source archives including the SRPM. When I build from the SRPM it works for me, perhaps it could be the path issue that you refer to in point 3. 3] Path references in %install section have now been standardized. FYI: In the SRPM source the "make all" in the %build section also runs a package "stage" target which is also the build's own workspace. These package dir references have now been taken out of the spec file and replaced with a DESTDIR option making the spec file look more standard. Once again I’ve updated the files with the same names as to not break the links in the original post. Tested ok, rpmlint is still content. Looking forward to your feedback. Kind regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.d ||e --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:33:22 EDT --- Simon, you're writing, that upstream splitting is common, gtk, ftp and ssh. But much more important is: How is the dependency chain? So does nssbackup actually work without the gtk subpackage? Does it work without ftp and ssh subpackages? Do the ftp and ssh subpackages bring new huge dependencies? I would like to hear your answers. And if ftp and ssh do not introduce a huge dependency and the gtk interface is always needed, I would say one package fits completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.d ||e --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:27:23 EDT --- Any news here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579
--- Comment #8 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13
19:24:46 EDT ---
Oh, I forgot something to 4.: The makefile currently doesn't support
parallel builds, thus "printdone" will show an error which is not true.
I think, we just can ignore that echo, as it is nonsense. If you like,
you can remove the %{?_smp_mflags} in %build and explain, that makefile
is not ready for %{?_smp_mflags} - that's an alternative to the echo.
Which one is up to you, I don't care here...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579
--- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13
19:21:15 EDT ---
1. Personally I would prefer the group "Applications/Internet", as tcpdump,
tcpick and iftop are very closed to the functionality (especially iftop)
and they've the group "Applications/Internet" (see comment #6)
2. Building your package in Rawhide fails for several reasons:
a) Upstream has written not really C++ compliant code and lacks several
#include lines (see comment #3, #4)
b) Upstream has a non autotools generated makefile which lacks some needed
functionality. I added the missing functionality and corrected a few
things from your patch more etc. (see comment #5)
c) Please write upstream an e-mail and explain, that these patches (or any
better) have to make it upstream and should be included into the next
release of ifstatus. Please set me on Cc: at that e-mail, thank you.
3. "Requires: ncurses" is not needed, because "Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)"
from "rpm -qp --requires ifstatus-1.1.0-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm" already lists
"libncurses.so.5", which makes a runtime dependency to ncurses, that will
be resolved e.g. by yum (see comment #6)
4. "make CFLAGS=%{?_smp_mflags}" looks strange - CFLAGS and %_smp_mflags are
two completely different things. CFLAGS are the compiler flags passed to
the makefile while %_smp_mflags are SMP flags expanded into "-j2" for e.g.
parallel builds during %build.
As per my patch from comment #5 the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are already honored to
CFLAGS, just using "make %{?_smp_mflags}" is enough (see comment #6)
5. "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name}" would have worked
with the original patch, but I think, it's better to less touch upstream
work and (sorry) my patch is hopefully near to get accepted by upstream.
Thus replaced by a hopefully better construct (see comment #6)
6. As far as I can see, ifstatus requires either root permissions or the +s
option (suid bit) to work. For security reasons, it's better, if only root
can execute the binary in case of a security issue at ifstatus (this is
how you've packaged it now - fine). And as it doesn't make sense to have
root-only executable binaries in %{_bindir}, I'm hereby putting ifstatus
into %{_sbindir} to satisfy that (see comment #6)
Any objections to my suggestions and explanations so far? Rest looks fine so
far to me, but the formal/official review is still missing. I will do that,
once we've clarified all my points above... ;-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:09:36 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339396) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339396) Diff of original ifstatus.spec with my suggested changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:05:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339394) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339394) ifstatus-1.1.0-gcc44.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:06:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339395) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339395) ifstatus-1.1.0-fedora.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.d ||e Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 18:28:11 EDT --- Personally I would prefer the group "Applications/Internet", as tcpdump, tcpick and iftop are very closed to the functionality (especially iftop) and they've the group "Applications/Internet". Package currently does not build in Rawhide: g++-c -o BorderDecorator.o BorderDecorator.cc In file included from BorderDecorator.cc:25: Main.h:74: warning: 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration BorderDecorator.cc: In member function 'virtual void BorderDecorator::Draw(Interfaces&, bool)': BorderDecorator.cc:44: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' BorderDecorator.cc: In member function 'void BorderDecorator::DrawHelp(Interface&, bool)': BorderDecorator.cc:90: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' BorderDecorator.cc:91: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' BorderDecorator.cc:92: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' BorderDecorator.cc:93: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' g++-c -o Config.o Config.cc In file included from Config.cc:25: Main.h:74: warning: 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration Config.cc: In member function 'void Config::LoadHomePath()': Config.cc:119: error: 'getenv' was not declared in this scope Config.cc: In member function 'void Config::LoadDefaultConfig()': Config.cc:132: error: 'getenv' was not declared in this scope make: *** [Config.o] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #16 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 18:25:40 EDT --- Thanks. Updated files SPEC: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin.spec SRPM: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Christian Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||c...@plauener.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c...@plauener.de Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #2 from Adam Miller 2009-04-13 17:52:35 EDT --- I'm really sorry but I don't understand the language that the output in the attached file is in. Can I by any chance get that in English? I have fixed the group: Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus-1.1.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483859] Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 17:42:34 EDT --- Hmmm, I guess that I will need some help with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 17:38:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339381) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339381) Build log rpmlint is complaining: [...@laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint ifstatus-1.1.0-1.src.rpm ifstatus.src: W: non-standard-group Applications/Utilities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. See 'less /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS' for valid groups. Isn't 'ncurses' picked up automatically by RPM? I'm not able to rebuild this package. See attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Denis Arnaud changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-13 17:35:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > * If you like to continue with the Fedora Packager sign-up procedure prior to > completing the SOCI review, feel free to do so, and I'll approve your account > request. I'll go on with the CVS package/module creation request on RMOL. [As for SOCI, I've worked a lot on lately, and I should be able to release a new version this week] Thanks a lot for your valuable support! I really appreciate the time and energy you have already spent on my training. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #18 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-13 17:35:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rmol Short Description: C++ library of Revenue Management and Optimisation classes and functions Owners: denisarnaud Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: denisarnaud -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488618] Review Request: Likewise Open - Likewise Active Directory Authentication Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-13 16:55:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) ok, please look Comment #3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488618] Review Request: Likewise Open - Likewise Active Directory Authentication Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
Krishna Ganugapati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(krish...@likewise |
|.com) |
--- Comment #5 from Krishna Ganugapati 2009-04-13
16:40:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> You need to provide a direct link to both the srpm and the spec file.
> Currently, one have to go to the url then look for the srpm. The spec file is
> not available at all and one need to download the 47 MB srpm to look at the
> spec.
> Preliminary comments :
> - License tag is not valid.
> - Release is not using the disttag.
> - BuildRoot is not valid.
> - Source0 and Source999 need to be a full URL.
> - Spec file uses both spaces and tabs for indenting.
> - The first half of the following line in %%build section is not needed :
> [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> - Same as above for %%clean section.
> - File attributes are not set. Add the following line at the top of all the
> packages sections :
> %defattr (-,root,root-)
> - %{_libdir}/likewise is not owned by any of the packages.
> - Config files are not marked as such use %config and %config(noreplace) where
> appropriate.
> - %{_sysconfdir}/likewise is not owned.
> - {_bindir}/demo is not owned.
> - {_prefix}/share should be {_datadir}.
> - /var should be {_localstatedir}
> - %{_prefix}/bin should be %{_bindir}.
> - %{_prefix}/data is not a standard dir and should not be created at all.
> - No version-release for the changelog entries.
> - No documentation included.
> - No license file included.
> - Services are provided but initscripts is not in the Requires: list nor are
> the proper %%pre, %preun, etc... scriptlet used.
> - You can use sed -i rather than sed then move, this will make the spec easier
> to read.
> - The build should probably not temper with the RPM_OPT_FLAGS and CFLAGS.
> - The whole %%build and %%install sctions look fishy.
> - Doesn't build in mock, needs at least to BuildRequires: openldap-devel,
> krb5-devel but even with that, build still fails.
> The list above is nowhere near complete, this package needs a lot of work.
> Please carefully read the packaging guidelines to fix all of the above. You
> should also run rpmlint on all the rpms and srpm.
> Also, not directly related to the review, one need to register to receive a
> link to the download page
> (http://www.likewise.com/community/index.php/download/). It seems there's no
> tarball to download but rather a lot of different tarballs. This is
> confusing...
Thank you! We're working on this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 16:39:27 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Jussi. (In reply to comment #1) > - Change > BR: python, python-setuptools-devel > to > BR: python-devel, python-setuptools > > if you intend to branch to EPEL (EL5 has just a python-setuptools package). At the moment I have no intention to maintain this package in EPEL. Perhaps in the future. > - Also, you can drop the ./ in front of setup.py. OK, thanks for this information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 16:39:42 EDT --- Jussi, thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > consistently. OK > - You could omit the ./ in front of setup.py since it's already run explicitly > by python. OK, I will change that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 16:41:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-upoints Short Description: Python modules for working with points on Earth Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 16:40:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-altgraph Short Description: Python graph (network) package Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] New: Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 Summary: Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxamill...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus-1.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: IFStatus was developed for Linux users that are usually in console mode. It is a simple, easy to use program for displaying commonly needed / wanted statistics in real time about ingoing and outgoing traffic of multiple network interfaces that is usually hard to find, with a simple and effecient view. It is the substitute for PPPStatus and EthStatus projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495577] New: Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 Summary: Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw-0.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://code.google.com/p/xsw/ Description: xsw is for all those who are looking for a console-based slideshow presentation tool. By using xsw, you create your presentation "by hand", using the xsw language described in the manual. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1295329 rpmlint output: [...@laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint xsw* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [...@laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint xsw-0.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-13 16:07:35 EDT --- Marked as NotReady. This depends on an updated fakechroot package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||febootstrap Status Whiteboard||NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||495563(febootstrap) Alias||libguestfs Status Whiteboard||NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||495564(libguestfs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495563] New: Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Summary: Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/febootstrap.spec SRPM URL: http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/febootstrap/files/febootstrap-1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: febootstrap is a Fedora equivalent to Debian's debootstrap. You can use it to create a basic Fedora filesystem, and build initramfs (initrd.img) or filesystem images. febootstrap also includes a separate tool to minimize filesystems by removing unneeded locales, documentation etc. The main difference from other appliance building tools is that this one doesn't need to be run as root. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495564] New: Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Summary: Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs.spec SRPM URL: http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/files/libguestfs-0.9-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Libguestfs is a library for accessing and modifying guest disk images. Amongst the things this is good for: making batch configuration changes to guests, getting disk used/free statistics (see also: virt-df), migrating between virtualization systems (see also: virt-p2v), performing partial backups, performing partial guest clones, cloning guests and changing registry/UUID/hostname info, and much else besides. Libguestfs uses Linux kernel and qemu code, and can access any type of guest filesystem that Linux and qemu can, including but not limited to: ext2/3/4, btrfs, FAT and NTFS, LVM, many different disk partition schemes, qcow, qcow2, vmdk. Libguestfs provides ways to enumerate guest storage (eg. partitions, LVs, what filesystem is in each LV, etc.). It can also run commands in the context of the guest. Also you can access filesystems over FTP. Libguestfs is a library that can be linked with C and C++ management programs. See also the 'guestfish' package for shell scripting and command line access. For Perl bindings, see 'libguestfs-perl'. For OCaml bindings, see 'libguestfs-ocaml-devel'. For Python bindings, see 'libguestfs-python'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:47:15 EDT --- kcometen4-1.0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update kcometen4'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3630 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:47:01 EDT --- kcometen4-1.0.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kcometen4'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3626 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492087] Review Request: pidgin-latex - A Pidgin plugin that displays LaTeX equations as images in your conversations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492087 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.3-2.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492087] Review Request: pidgin-latex - A Pidgin plugin that displays LaTeX equations as images in your conversations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492087 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:47:37 EDT --- pidgin-latex-1.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:45:44 EDT --- python-TraitsBackendQt-3.0.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|3.0.3-4.fc9 |3.0.3-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:46:35 EDT --- coccinella-0.96.12-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.9-1.fc10 |0.9-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492974] Review Request: calf - Audio plugins pack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:46:52 EDT --- calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update calf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3623 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:46:26 EDT --- python-pyrad-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-pyrad'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3618 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.9-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:43:10 EDT --- libkml-0.6.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|3.0.2-2.fc10|3.0.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.96.12-2.fc9 |0.96.12-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:43:03 EDT --- lxmusic-0.2.3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:42:12 EDT --- jmod-0.9-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:44:41 EDT --- jmod-0.9-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.4.8-1.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.6.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458952] Review Request: sems - an extensible SIP media server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:40:41 EDT --- sems-1.1.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update sems'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3568 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.4.8-1.fc9 |0.4.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.1.2-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.8.0-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:39:53 EDT --- libwps-0.1.2-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.029-2.fc10|0.029-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:44:00 EDT --- emacs-mmm-0.4.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.8.0-1.fc10|1.8.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:43:45 EDT --- emacs-mmm-0.4.8-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:40:08 EDT --- phoronix-test-suite-1.8.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:41:18 EDT --- perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:43:24 EDT --- phoronix-test-suite-1.8.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:42:25 EDT --- python-Traits-3.0.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:31:05 EDT --- python-pyrad-1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-pyrad'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3503 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:31:10 EDT --- unclutter-8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unclutter'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3504 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458952] Review Request: sems - an extensible SIP media server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:39:38 EDT --- sems-1.1.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sems'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3560 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:38:18 EDT --- kvirc-4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update kvirc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3553 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.029-2.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.96.12-2.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.054-1.fc9 |1.054-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492125] Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.14.1-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:38:50 EDT --- perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490989] Review Request: subdownloader - A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490989 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:38:23 EDT --- subdownloader-2.0.9.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:37:46 EDT --- perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492125] Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:41:32 EDT --- mingw32-pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:40:21 EDT --- coccinella-0.96.12-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492708] Review Request: xml2 - XML/Unix Processing Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492708 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:39:06 EDT --- xml2-0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.0008-1.fc9|0.0008-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
