[Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 02:46:10 EDT --- gausssum-2.1.6-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gausssum-2.1.6-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 02:45:22 EDT --- gausssum-2.1.6-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gausssum-2.1.6-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 02:44:28 EDT --- python-cclib-0.91-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cclib-0.91-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 02:43:25 EDT --- python-cclib-0.91-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cclib-0.91-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498866] New: Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-FormValidator-Constra ints-DateTime/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime-1.09-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This package provides constraint routines for Data::FormValidator for dealing with dates and times. It provides an easy mechanism for validating dates of any format (using strptime(3)) and transforming those dates (as long as you 'untaint' the fields) into valid DateTime objects, or into strings that would be properly formatted for various database engines. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334715 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-05-04 02:33:05
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The spec was recreated because it is not noarch.
Please elaborate. I don't see any arch-specific portions inside of this
package.
IMO, this package should be a "noarch" packages.
> The problem in test, which I see is:
> PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
> "test_harness(0,
> 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
>
> t/Kate.t .. 448/? Use of uninitialized value $ch in concatenation (.) or
> string
> at
> /home/marca/rpmbuild/BUILD/Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.04/blib/lib/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/Template.pm
> line 534.
>
I am also seeing these, but don't have a "quick fix" for it (and no time to
investigate further), sorry.
> I can't still get rid off double
> perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Alerts).
The rpmlint warning stems from these two files inside of the sources:
lib/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/Alerts
vs.
lib/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/Alerts.pm
They conflict.
I would suspect "Alerts" to be an outdated version of "Alerts.pm", which likely
was packaged into the tarball by mistake. I'd say, this is something to contact
upstream about to clarify.
For the moment, I'd propose to remove "Alerts" in %prep and to watch how far
you will get. I tried
rm -f lib/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/Alerts
and found it appears to work.
Further issue: Most permissions of the files inside of the tarball are wrong.
Proposal: Add
find -type f -exec chmod -x {} \;
to %prep
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 01:58:06 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 01:57:53 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 01:57:58 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 01:57:46 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 01:58:03 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:53:23 EDT --- perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:53:18 EDT --- perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:50:40 EDT --- perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498862] New: Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 Summary: Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fed...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/clthreads.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/clthreads-2.4.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Clthreads is a C++ wrapper library around the POSIX threads API. rpmlint: clthreads-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Not much we can do about it. koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:49:52 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:49:09 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:49:48 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:50:45 EDT --- perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:49:05 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-04 01:29:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Any-Moose Short Description: Use Moose or Mouse automagically Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Ivan Efremov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(iefre...@unipro.r | |u) | --- Comment #26 from Ivan Efremov 2009-05-04 01:22:08 EDT --- I'll update CVS branch during next 2-3 days -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-05-04 01:09:58 EDT --- waiting for perl(YAML::XS) >= 0.32 build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334582 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #15 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-04 01:10:45 EDT --- Yeah very much. I just confirmed that debian packages also had same issues. I had a chit chat with upstream and confirmed will be working on these issues in future releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-05-04 01:05:52 EDT --- I also think description you included should have changed to This package is aimed to be another implementation of MIME::Words so that it will achieve more exact conformance with RFC 2047 (former RFC 1522) specifications. Additionally, it contains some improvements. Following synopsis and descriptions are inherited from its inspirer, then added descriptions on improvements (**) or changes and clarifications (*).* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Bug 497661 depends on bug 497660, which changed state. Bug 497660 Summary: Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-05-04 00:58:43 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334537 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. perl-MIME-EncWords.noarch: E: useless-provides perl(MIME::EncWords) => This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it + source files match upstream url 2009449d0af39275d45e45a4afcaf58f MIME-EncWords-1.010.101.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=74, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.00 sys + 0.14 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.20 CPU) + Package perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(MIME::EncWords) perl(MIME::EncWords) = 1.010.101 Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application suggestions: 1) make sure to remove unnecessary provides perl(MIME::EncWords) 2) you don't need Requires: perl(MIME::Charset) >= 1.006.2 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|rjo...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-04 00:32:35 EDT --- Updated and built. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=100713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498839] Review Request: hunspell-so - Somali spelling dictionary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498839 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-05-04 00:05:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334539 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 334c3dd1cbcc797dbc9f5a0f4dbaf2e3 so...@dictionaries.addons.mozilla.org3.xpi + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #44 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-04 00:03:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > New update Thanks! > 1) carries around a ppc workaround that really should go in macros.ghc Yeah we could add something in the macros to help with this, but it is a bit tedious: I hope we can fix the real problem on ppc soon. > 2) only builds on fedora 12 (yay?) I hope to backport latest ghc to f11 soon. We might have to wait for a new gtk2hs release. > 3) converts the value added default config into a patch directly against the > upstream source. what this patch does is replaces the xmonad line of the > default verbose config with an expansion that loads xterm with the man page > showing. in the future, i'll probably add a comment to the user Good idea. I think better to rename the patch to xmonad-config-show-manpage.patch or something like that. > 4) includes just xmonad-start without doing xmonad-session. Good - I think the name in the .desktop file should just be "xmonad" or "XMonad" though not "xmonad-start". > 5) renumbers the source to make more sense > 6) includes other changes proposed here Ok Otherwise looks pretty good to me now. I am going to take it for a spin and then do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:56:35 EDT --- Please use your fedora account system name in Owners. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:58:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:54:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498703] Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:52:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:50:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:53:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498654] Review Request: uget - A download manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498654 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:51:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:53:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:47:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:46:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:44:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:43:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:39:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:42:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:41:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482763] Review Request: compat-guichan07 - compatibility libraries for guichan 0.7.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482763 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:38:38 EDT --- Note that you always get a devel branch. Make sure and follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life for the devel branch. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #13 from Eric Moret 2009-05-03 23:35:30 EDT --- Should now build on x86_64. New files at: SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet-0.1.63-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC URL: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #13 from Ed Brand 2009-05-03 23:36:48 EDT --- OK, apologies for the delay. Had a series of personal issues to resolve. In reading through the comments, here is a summary of what we've got.. a/ no issue b/ no issue c/ no issue d/ no issue e/ no issue f/ no issue g/ * W: non-standard-uid /usr/bin/sslogger slogger h/ * E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/sslogger slogger 06555 i/ * E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/sl 0750 j/ in progress... k/ no issue l/ convince me of the need of %pre, %post, %prein m/ no issue n/ no issue README ... in progress So lets start a dialogue on the suid, user/group, and permission: Here is what I was looking to accomplish: - Create a binary which allows the user to gain access to another user's account, including root, whilst logging all keystrokes. - Create group of users "sloggers" whose members are permitted to review/audit other users activities. Hence the /i 750 Breaking it down, g/ I need a suid user/group, as I am reluctant to create a suid root binary. True the Makefile installed as suid root which the spec file later changes permission to the other "non standard" user/group in the %pre/%post. This is related to /k. h/ The log files are written at a lower privilege level and not as root. i/ The permission on the directory are set to exclude users that are not in the audit group "sloggers" l/ Needed to create a non-root logging audit directory. As stated, I am reluctant to crate a suid/sgid root binary. I am open to suggestions to resolve the above. Thanks -Ed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||iarn...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|iarn...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-03 23:27:25 EDT --- + source files match upstream. d159b8b99180599ecc618078c93f3501da8c1469 Any-Moose-0.07.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text is included. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334395 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-Any-Moose.src: I: checking perl-Any-Moose.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Any::Moose) = 0.07 perl-Any-Moose = 0.07-1.fc12 = rpm -qp --requires perl-Any-Moose-0.07-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Mouse) >= 0.20 perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=13, Tests=49, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.09 usr 0.01 sys + 4.76 cusr 0.14 csys = 5.00 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #15 from arthurguru 2009-05-03 23:24:59 EDT --- Packet delayed - I use the far less luxurious option of internet dial-up - though not by choice. Is there anything outstanding? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:16:37 EDT --- Andreas: Sorry for hijacking here, but we really need to have this review done. I hope you don't mind I take over? OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 3d519bc7d812aed8f6e4288b6d3cdf26 gnome-media-2.26.0.tar.bz2 3d519bc7d812aed8f6e4288b6d3cdf26 gnome-media-2.26.0.tar.bz2.orig OK - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. Should the Requires: gnome-media be versioned? Or will it cause any issue for this to be out of step with gnome-media? I suspect not, but though I would mention it. 2. rpmlint says: gst-mixer.src:163: W: macro-in-%changelog defines Minor issue... change to %%defines in changelog? :) gst-mixer.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gst-mixer.schemas Can be ignored. I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Fix the %%define and address if gnome-media requires should be versioned before import? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759
--- Comment #6 from arthurguru 2009-05-03 23:17:43
EDT ---
Hi Silas,
I'm using f7 which still uses python 2.5 (r25:51908, Apr 10 2007) (which is why
I stressed "on my machine").
I'm building against the source archive as:
% rpmbuild -ba funcshell.spec
The build works, but the egg-info file is not present in %{buildroot}, which
then fails the packaging part of the spec file.
Not familiar with python history but 2 years is a long time in software. If its
a version issue and f7 is not reaching end-of-life status with looming f11 then
maybe some advanced packaging syntax could be used in the specfile.
E.g.
BuildRequires: python >=
Kind Regards,
Arthur
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 Denis Arnaud changed: What|Removed |Added CC||denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org --- Comment #33 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-03 21:27:44 EDT --- Besides, for Boost 1.37 (Fedora 11 / Rawhide), there seems to be an issue with the dependency on libicu, as in the build.log of RMOL (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1334520&name=root.log): DEBUG backend.py:554: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f12-build-444978-72210/root/ resolvedep 'libicu' 'gsl-devel >= 1.8' 'ghostscript' 'cppunit-devel >= 1.10' 'texlive-latex' 'boost-devel >= 1.34' 'doxygen' 'texlive-dvips' DEBUG util.py:280: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f12-build-444978-72210/root/ resolvedep 'libicu' 'gsl-devel >= 1.8' 'ghostscript' 'cppunit-devel >= 1.10' 'texlive-latex' 'boost-devel >= 1.34' 'doxygen' 'texlive-dvips' DEBUG util.py:256: 0:libicu-4.2-0.1.d03.fc12.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:gsl-devel-1.12-3.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:ghostscript-8.64-6.fc12.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:cppunit-devel-1.12.1-2.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:texlive-latex-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:boost-devel-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 1:doxygen-1.5.8-2.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:texlive-dvips-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:319: Child returncode was: 0 DEBUG backend.py:554: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f12-build-444978-72210/root/ install 'libicu' 'gsl-devel >= 1.8' 'ghostscript' 'cppunit-devel >= 1.10' 'texlive-latex' 'boost-devel >= 1.34' 'doxygen' 'texlive-dvips' DEBUG util.py:280: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f12-build-444978-72210/root/ install 'libicu' 'gsl-devel >= 1.8' 'ghostscript' 'cppunit-devel >= 1.10' 'texlive-latex' 'boost-devel >= 1.34' 'doxygen' 'texlive-dvips' DEBUG util.py:256: boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 from build has depsolving problems DEBUG util.py:256:--> Missing Dependency: libicuuc.so.40()(64bit) is needed by package boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:256: boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 from build has depsolving problems DEBUG util.py:256:--> Missing Dependency: libicui18n.so.40()(64bit) is needed by package boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:256: Error: Missing Dependency: libicuuc.so.40()(64bit) is needed by package boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:256: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem DEBUG util.py:256: Error: Missing Dependency: libicui18n.so.40()(64bit) is needed by package boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:256: You could try running: package-cleanup --problems DEBUG util.py:256: package-cleanup --dupes DEBUG util.py:256: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest DEBUG util.py:256: The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils package. DEBUG util.py:319: Child returncode was: 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Ryan Bair changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #342187|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #342189|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #12 from Ryan Bair 2009-05-03 20:01:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342262) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342262) Update spec file Going the (seemingly) preferred route of fixing the install process in the spec as opposed to the source itself. I feel pretty good with this one. Comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498849] New: Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 Summary: Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alekc...@googlemail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula-3.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This application is especially designed for generating an image (e.g. PNG) from a LaTeX equation, this using a nice GUI. Support for Copy-Paste, Save as image/pdf/ps and drag-and-drop is included. In addition to supporting a whole GUI-based user interface, this package includes the library KLFBackend to integrate KLatexFormula functionality into your programs. $ rpmlint klatexformula-3.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm klatexformula-debuginfo-3.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm klatexformula-devel-3.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint klatexformula-3.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm klatexformula.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch0: klatexformula-lib64.patch 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498846] New: Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Summary: Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/R-RM2.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/R-RM2-0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm [FE-NEEDSPONSOR] That is my fourth package for Fedora, but the second one for R, and I thus still need a sponsor. Description: RM2 is a simple package that implements functions used in revenue management and pricing environments. Web site: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RM2/ Additional notes: * I followed the R-specific guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/R). * That package requires the R-msm package, which I submitted for review/approval separately (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Denis Arnaud changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||498846 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Denis Arnaud changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||498845 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Denis Arnaud changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Denis Arnaud changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498845] New: Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Summary: Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/R-msm.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/R-msm-0.8.2-1.fc10.src.rpm [FE-NEEDSPONSOR] That is my third package for Fedora, but the first one for R, and I thus still need a sponsor. Description: Functions for fitting general continuous-time Markov and hidden Markov multi-state models to longitudinal data. Both Markov transition rates and the hidden Markov output process can be modelled in terms of covariates. A variety of observation schemes are supported, including processes observed at arbitrary times, completely-observed processes, and censored states. Web site: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/msm/ Additional notes: * I followed the R-specific guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/R). * I need that package, as it is a dependency of another package I would like to submit, namely R-RM2 (for which I shall open a distinct package review request). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-03 19:03:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 1] rpmlint is not silent on actual package websvn.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/websvn apache websvn needs this to be able to temporarily cache some generated files. The owner is indeed apache. websvn.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/websvn/temp ../../../var/tmp I believe this warning is bogus. /var/tmp exists on the file system. I've tried to fix this, but failed. I'd love to see it fixed though and I welcome any suggestion. > 2] do you really need patch for replacing 3 lines? sed with comment in %prep > will be imho better readable. Well, the patch is perfectly legible imo. And also, I'd rather not use sed for this kind of thing, it would be too easy to break things w/o noticing. I'd rather keep a patch and possibly rebase it if the underlying code changes, rather than silently breaking it with sed. > 3] I think that it would be good to add webserver into requires. Because > websnv > wouldn't work without webserver. Right, and also the package wouldn't even install because the apache user wouldn't exist. I'll add : Requires(pre): httpd (In reply to comment #4) > If the provided config files works with httpd I think it's better to require > it > rather than a generic web server. On the other hand, those _not_ wanting to > use > httpd as web server will be disappointed... > > A possible solution to this (used in the mantis package) is to split the > config > file in a subpackage and let that require httpd. It looks a bit too much to me to have a subpackage just for the apache conf and I'm not sure this would be enough anyway, because some files are owned by the apache user. Actually, I've never used any other webserver, and I'm not sure how, say lighttpd, works (user, conf file, etc...). I'll dig the guidelines for advices. Any pointers welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 18:26:54 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 18:27:03 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 18:26:58 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 Bug 497663 depends on bug 497662, which changed state. Bug 497662 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-03 18:24:17 EDT --- Imported and built for F-9, F10 and F-11. Imported and built a slightly older version for EL-5 to be able to fulfil the build requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #11 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-05-03 18:05:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I added the two patches as attachments to the bug. The first patch is against > the spec file and the second patch is against the unpacked source tarball. > Both > patches fix the assumption that the libdir should be in prefix/lib (/usr/lib) > which works on x86 but not on x86_64 (where it is /usr/lib64). Also, the > x86_64 > build does not work because of the pc file issue described in bug 490025 > (which > I also wrote a patch for yesterday). I would mark it as a blocker, but I don't > seem to have access to do so. > > I'm not trying to take over your package, just fixing a few miscellaneous > issues that prevented me from compiling/installing/using/enjoying the package > myself. Is not what I meant, is just that you are making changes to a also newbie guy package, so I don't have a clue if your patchs are correct or not, thats is way I was waiting to some sponsor/experienced guys to let what to do with the packaes. But sure, if in the meantime you test some of your patch and you know that makes the magic, so then is a step forward, is just that we are going to wait for someone that really tell us that our changes are correct...Still have lot of doubts about how koji works, etc... Thanks!! Mauricio.. > > As a warning, I am new to both RPM packaging and the Fedora guidelines so I > could have committed a major sin. Please check my patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 16:40:10 EDT --- Marking as blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 16:43:05
EDT ---
Oh, this has been left hanging, sorry.
Lukas is right: you are mixing macros which is not allowed. Choose either
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} and stick with it, don't mix the two.
Also, I don't like to see macros used for standard unix commands, but this is
maybe more a matter of style. I think it just makes the spec file harder to
read.
I'll trust you to fix the macro issue upon import to CVS. The package has been
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #15 from Matthew Miller 2009-05-03 16:46:05 EDT --- (update - can't work on this this weekend but will monday or tuesday.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481442] Review Request: clutter-perl - Perl bindings to the Clutter OpenGL canvas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481442 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu Flag||needinfo?(allis...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 16:42:33 EDT --- Marking needinfo w.r.t. comment #1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498839] New: Review Request: hunspell-so - Somali spelling dictionary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-so - Somali spelling dictionary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498839 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-so - Somali spelling dictionary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-so.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-so-0.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Somali hunspell dictionary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu Flag||needinfo?(g...@zimt.uni-siege ||n.de) --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 16:37:07 EDT --- Do you have a timeframe in which you plan on submitting this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||498564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498838] New: Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically Alias: perl-Any-Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Summary: Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Any-Moose OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cw...@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Any-Moose.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Any-Moose-0.07-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module allows one to take advantage of the features Moose/Mouse provides, while allowing one to let the program author determine if Moose or Mouse should be used; when use'd, we load Mouse if Moose isn't already loaded, otherwise we go with Moose. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334395 Additional Comment: This is a new dep of Data::Visitor 0.24 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #12 from David Sugar 2009-05-03 16:26:53 EDT --- rpmlint gave me a couple of useful additional things: ucommon.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install ucommon.src: W: non-standard-group System/Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||498837 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140
LukasHetzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@gmx.at
--- Comment #5 from LukasHetzi 2009-05-03 16:12:51 EDT ---
rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Package naming and spec file name is correct.
License is correct.
Spec file is legible, but doesn't consistently use macros (see below)
Package is correct.
- Do not mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}
- You could copy all php files in one line
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498195] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-03 15:44:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/zarafa-webaccess.spec If you currently want to test this package, you need to be an approved Zarafa beta tester. Needed patch for webaccess is included in the *.nosrc.rpm package. Note, that 6.30.0 hasn't been released and I'm updating the snapshot whenever a new beta preview gets available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #11 from David Sugar 2009-05-03 15:33:34
EDT ---
Result of too much last minute editing :)
Added %?dist...and "%{__make} DESTDIR=%{buildroot}/ install" for %install.
Updated %changelog entry to correct format...
I will do the sipwitch one later today (or in the week) as you suggest.
As for ucommon-config.in...hmm...that one I have to think about a bit. I
actually use pkgconfig, so I do not normally think about ucommon-config :), and
passing --prefix is perhaps a less common use case. This may be an issue to
resolve for the next upstream patch release...
Updated files:
http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon.spec
http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon-2.0.5-3.src.rpm
There was a time I used to create a lot of rpm packages, but that was years
ago...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498197] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498197 --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-03 15:31:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/zarafa-webaccess-mobile.spec If you currently want to test this package, you need to be an approved Zarafa beta tester. Needed patch for webaccess-mobile is included in the *.nosrc.rpm package. Note, that 6.30.0 hasn't been released and I'm updating the snapshot whenever a new beta preview gets available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #14 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-03 15:10:52 EDT --- It may be nice, if you can tell the upstream authors, that this is important to get a minimum of QA insurance, to make sure, that the package works well on all of our supoorted plattforms. Even if you can build an application for a specific plattform, you doesn't have the warrenty, that the application will run on this specific plattform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Philippe Makowski changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-03 14:38:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: firebird Short Description: SQL relational database management system Owners: Philippe Makowski Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 14:30:13 EDT --- Let me know when perl-JavaScript-Minifier is in rawhide :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498703] Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498703] Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 14:31:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Term-Completion Short Description: Read one line of user input, with convenience functions Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-03
14:26:46 EDT ---
Assigning.
Before doing full-review
- Why is %install section empty this time?
- Please consider to use %?dist tag:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag
- Is this the expected behavior on ucommon-config.in?
16 if [ "`ldd /bin/sh | grep lib64`" = "" ]
17 then
18 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib
19 else
20 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib64
21 fi
56 case "$1" in
57 --prefix=*)
58 prefix=$optarg
59 includedir=$prefix/include
60 libdir=$prefix/lib
61 ;;
Here when --prefix or --exec_prefix is specified, libdir
will always points to X/lib even on 64 bits architecture.
- Please follow Fedora's %changelog format:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs
! For sipwitch please submit a new review request for the
package and make this review request block the review
request for sipwitch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #9 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 13:55:01 EDT --- Hmm... looks like a small ruby script hardcoded to use http://www.rafb.net/paste. Given that both of these packages provide similar base functionality (but this one supproting significantly more), I wonder if it wouldn't be approprate to just have perl-App-Nopaste explicitly Conflict: with nopaste; or perhaps leverage the alternatives system (see, e.g. man update-alternatives). I admittedly know a very small amount about the alternatives system, but it would seem to fit this situation... Anyways, I've probably hijacked the review tix enough :) Let me know if there's anything I can do if you decide to go either of those routes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cw...@alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 13:43:05 EDT --- Generally speaking, dos2unix (or the ever popular "sed -e 's/\r//'") doesn't strictly belong in %prep, but it fits far better in there than it does in %build. Stripping dos-like EOL characters from source is as much preparing it as is patching it, or removing errant execute bits, etc. Absent a very compelling reason, we wouldn't include a %patch in %build, would we? koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334190 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 0034e6c7961d2f9ed8b5e6ad60ac7333941d73d9 Acme-PlayCode-0.11.tar.gz 0034e6c7961d2f9ed8b5e6ad60ac7333941d73d9 Acme-PlayCode-0.11.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. => perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.noarch.rpm <= > rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > provides for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(Acme::PlayCode) = 0.11 perl-Acme-PlayCode = 0.11-2.fc12 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::Averything) = 0.10 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::DoubleToSingle) = 0.10 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::ExchangeCondition) = 0.10 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::NumberPlus) = 0.11 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::PrintComma) = 0.10 > requires for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(Data::Dumper) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Path::Class) perl(PPI) perl(PPI::Token::Comment) perl(vars) => perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.src.rpm <= > rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > provides for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.src.rpm > requires for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.src.rpm dos2unix perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(Module::Build) perl(Moose) >= 0.57 perl(MooseX::Object::Pluggable) >= 0.0008 perl(Path::Class) >= 0.16 perl(PPI) >= 1.201 perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 13:38:22 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
