[Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #17 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 03:02:34 EDT --- Well, upstream mixes letters too. It uses uppercase V for the main archive, while lower case v for archives within this archive. So, srpm and spec file are with upper case V, while binary rpms start with lower case v. I also prefer small caps but maybe in this case it should be better to use upper case V for CVS? I'll wait for sponsor's comment on this before changing fedora-cvs flag again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 03:05:05 EDT --- Ups, sorry. I should think a bit before posting as I just now realized everything ends up in upper case V. So, it's probably better that it is upper case in CVS after all. I'm changing fedora-cvs flag and here is CVS request again. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: Vuurmuur Short Description: Firewall manager built on top of iptables Owners: sgros Branches: F-12 InitialCC: sgros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk 2009-11-20 03:11:10 EDT --- Seems fine now. Builds locally and with mock for f12, although build fails for rawhide mock while building javadoc sub-package. Looking at exception, it's javadoc fault. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #57 from Tim Fenn f...@stanford.edu 2009-11-20 03:23:12 EDT --- so upon further investigation, guile-gui requires guile-gtk, which has been replaced by guile-gnome. So guile-gui would need to be updated to use guile-gnome, which it seems won't happen (even though there is a maintainer, it seems he isn't working on it actively). Coot allows for the building of guile support, but not guile-gtk support, which will just disable a bunch of the extensions. This isn't a big deal, and upstream does have plans to move all the guile-gtk stuff to use guile-gnome instead, so I'll just flip the switch when the code is updated to support guile-gnome. tl;dr: no guile-gui package, disable guile-gtk in coot, lose a few of the extensions, enable extensions when coot supports guile-gnome. I'm currently waiting for upstream to implement libcurl support in place of net-http (the goosh dependency is gone now), then all should be good to go. Will update when that is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165552] Review Request: banner - Prints a short string to the console in very large letters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165552 --- Comment #14 from Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at 2009-11-20 03:30:20 EDT --- See comment in #537805 :-) The same is true for this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-11-20 03:48:07 EDT --- Apparently a known sinjdoc issue bug #449851. Build with OpenJDK sinjdoc succeeded: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1819012 Thanks for review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: microba Short Description: Set of JFC (Swing) components Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2009-11-20 03:55:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) add BR for Test/More.pm Don't know how I missed this. perl(Test::More) and perl(Test::Pod) added to BRs. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2009-11-20 03:53:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) APPROVED. Thanks for the review, Parag! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Authen-Simple Short Description: Simple Authentication Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510843] Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510843 Rasmus Ory Nielsen r...@ron.dk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||albert.bogdanow...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #9 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen r...@ron.dk 2009-11-20 04:14:09 EDT --- *** Bug 538420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538420] Review Request: samtools - Tools for sorting, merging etc. SAM format files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538420 Rasmus Ory Nielsen r...@ron.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||r...@ron.dk Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen r...@ron.dk 2009-11-20 04:14:09 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 510843 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 04:18:29 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1819061 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 99376e7e79b527738cc4b9fd48cb1556ea05ed50 CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=9, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.12 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.17 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc13.noarch = Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::SuperForm) = 0.4 Requires: perl(Exporter) perl(HTML::SuperForm) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532818] Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532818 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 04:17:53 EDT --- gdouros-musica-fonts-2.52-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-musica-fonts-2.52-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2009-11-20 04:26:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) APPROVED. Thanks! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm Short Description: Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539469] New: Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539469 Summary: Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kana...@kanarip.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/OpenSRF.spec SRPM URL: not-yet-available Description: Open Scalable Request Framework (OpenSRF, pronounced “open surf”) is a framework that allows the development of software without requiring a detailed knowledge of Evergreen's structure. First package and make available the dependencies. Till that time, this review request can barely move. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539472] Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539472 Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||539469 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539469] Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539469 Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||539472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539472] Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcached
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539472 Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: libmemcache |Review Request: libmemcache |- C API to memcache |- C API to memcached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539472] New: Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539472 Summary: Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcache Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kana...@kanarip.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/libmemcache.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f13/SRPMS/libmemcache-1.4.0-0.1rc2.fc13.src.rpm Description: libmemcache is a C API library to the memcached server (http://danga.com/memcached). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539471] New: Review Request: libserializer - JFreeReport General Serialization Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libserializer - JFreeReport General Serialization Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539471 Summary: Review Request: libserializer - JFreeReport General Serialization Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/libserializer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/libserializer-1.1.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This JFreeReport General Serialization Framework is a dependency of jfreereport which itself is a dependency of the reportdesigner extension of OpenOffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539480] New: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.tray...@cern.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Instances of the HTTP::Daemon::SSL class are HTTP/1.1 servers that listen on a socket for incoming requests. The HTTP::Daemon::SSL is a sub-class of IO::Socket::SSL, so you can perform socket operations directly on it too. $ rpmlint SPECS/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec \ RPMS/noarch/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-1.fc13.noarch.rpm \ SRPMS/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-1.fc13.src.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1819132 Hopefully an easy review. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 05:30:24 EDT --- kde-plasma-smooth-tasks-0.0.1-0.1.wip20091116.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-smooth-tasks-0.0.1-0.1.wip20091116.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kahl ak...@imttechnologies.com 2009-11-20 05:43:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/GNUnet/GNUnet.spec SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/GNUnet/GNUnet-0.8.0c-1.fc12.src.rpm A first check after a mock build yields: GNUnet.src: W: strange-permission gnunetd.init 0755 Can be solved by setting that file to chmod 644 and installing it with install -m 755 instead of using cp. Hmm odd. Done. GNUnet.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/gnunetd Done. Also added Requires: logrotate. GNUnet.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/gnunetd This is a false positive and even contradicts with the guidelines: Each Fedora SysV-style initscript which needs to start by default in any runlevel must include this line in the LSB Header (if the # Default-Start: line is present, then there must also be a # Default-Stop: line.). If the service does not start by default in any runlevel, this line should be omitted. (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#.23_Default-Stop:_line) There is no Default-Start contrary to what rpmlint utters and there should never be for GNUnet: (Default-Start:) Only services which are really required for a vital system should define runlevels here. (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#.23_Default-Start:_line) GNUnet.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/gnunetd $prog rpmlint is just too stupid to interpolate sh variables - if you replace all instances of $prog with its value (gnunetd), the warning vanishes. The line in question should be: lockfile=/var/lock/subsys/$prog Really want me to change that? I also get a flood of GNUnet.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency when running rpmlint on the installed packages. Please check this as well. Looks like all dload'able plugins are linked against the same set of so:s; definitely an issue for upstream. Shall I report to upstream first to have this fixed? Should be an issue of splitting up some Makefile.am:s. Furthermore please add comments to the patches as to where they come from and if they have been brought to upstream's notice at some point (bugzilla etc.). All patches written by myself; patch0: GNUnet build assumes postgres includes use the postgresql prefix which is not true for Fedora. patch1: GNUnet build assumes Qt4's moc and uic preprocessing tools to be available under that name but for Fedora it's moc-qt4 and uic-qt4. patch2: GNUnet build assumes dialog's headers to be in $prefix/include but for Fedora it uses a prefix with the same name (dialog). patch3: This fixes really a GNUnet bug naming cpp defines wrong when using dialog, for cdialog the bug is not present but cdialog is not available for Fedora. patch4: This one is also a real bug where GNUnet's plugin path is always assumed to be $prefix/lib/GNUnet despite $plugindir being used in other places correctly which is expanded to the arch-dependent lib dir at build time. For patches 0-2 we have to find out whether Fedora uses file locations and names from the vanilla build of postgres, Qt4 and dialog; in this case, upstream most probably uses Debian-specific locations and names (seems to be their primary development distro) so it'd be their issue. In any other case, the problem is ours and subject of further investigation with the corresponding packages' maintainers. The problem addressed by patch4 *could* be caused by Debian-specific behavior of GNUnet, do you know whether Debian uses /usr/lib for plugins independent from installed architecture? Patch3 is obviously an issue for upstream. Shall we fix the upstream-related stuff before proceeding any further? I can report everything after investigation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539486] New: Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-AsObject/perl-Data-AsObject.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-AsObject/perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Data::AsObject provides easy object-oriented access to complex and arbitrarily nested perl data structures. It is particulary suitable for working with hash-based representation of XML data, as generated by modules like XML::Complie or XML::TreePP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 --- Comment #6 from Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 06:16:01 EDT --- Just tried on F12. Using 'add-widgets' I get this plasma popup: This object could not be created for the following reason: could not find component: smooth-tasks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #5 from Giuseppe Paterno gpate...@redhat.com 2009-11-20 06:32:34 EDT --- New SRPMS that fixes manpages to reflect the fork and included missing man page of otppasswd (from: Russ herrold) Confirmed that this package builds on rawhide (credit of: Russ herrold) SRPMS: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.2-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 06:41:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Just tried on F12. Using 'add-widgets' I get this plasma popup: This object could not be created for the following reason: could not find component: smooth-tasks *bummer* That was gone during the review. Can you open a seperate bug for it please. I will digg into it again. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532818] Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532818 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 06:48:29 EDT --- gdouros-musica-fonts-2.52-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-musica-fonts-2.52-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 07:28:54 EDT --- Ok, maybe we have a quick fix. You need KDE 4.3.3 to have it working. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 07:33:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dia-CMOS Short Description: Dia CMOS Shapes Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 07:33:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dia-Digital Short Description: Dia Digital Shapes Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 07:33:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dia-electric2 Short Description: Dia electric2 Shapes Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538332] Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538332 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538332] Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538332 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 07:34:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: covered Short Description: Verilog code coverage analyzer Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 07:32:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dia-electronic Short Description: Dia electronic Shapes Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #6 from R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com 2009-11-20 07:56:19 EDT --- this was what a private email to the maintainer referecned in #5 1) I see a lot of marketing cruft mentioning TRI-D in the files in the README* --- would it be possible to re-write these to remove the 'marketing' aspect? 2) I suspect that the 'changelog' entries convention of mentioning the V and R was not known to you: compare: * Mon Feb 11 2008 Frank Cusack fr...@tri-dsystems.com 3.1.0-1 to * Thu Nov 19 2009 Giuseppe Paterno' gpate...@redhat.com 3) the man page URL field is probably stale 4) the man page mentions two additional man pages not present: [herr...@dhcp-103 otpd]$ man gsmd No manual entry for gsmd [herr...@dhcp-103 otpd]$ man otppasswd No manual entry for otppasswd 5) a commented sample /etc/otppasswd is REALLY needed, to show what is possible, and marked as a (config) file 6) [herr...@dhcp-103 otpd]$ rpm -ql otpd | grep reqs The 'reqsynctool' binary -- probably living in either /usr/bin/ or /usr/sbin/ is missing? = I an in a TUI only environment presently -- I will file this later today in the bugzilla, or you might do it for me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #7 from R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com 2009-11-20 08:04:45 EDT --- sadly, the patch worked an a completely stock C5, i386, but fails a bit later on a souped up x86_64 build box: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_REENTRANT -DUSE_SOCKET -DHAVE_CLOCK_GETTIME -DVERSION=\3.2.1\ -Wall -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -Wshadow -Wsign-compare -Werror -c -o failover_thread.o failover_thread.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors failover_thread.c: In function 'failover_thread': failover_thread.c:112: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size failover_thread.c:113: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size make: *** [failover_thread.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28908 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28908 (%build) [herr...@centos-5 otpd]$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-libgcj-multifile --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada --enable-java-awt=gtk --disable-dssi --enable-plugin --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-1.4.2.0/jre --with-cpu=generic --host=x86_64-redhat-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46) [herr...@centos-5 otpd]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #8 from Giuseppe Paterno gpate...@redhat.com 2009-11-20 10:20:18 EDT --- Let's try again :))) SRPM: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.3-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd.spec I tried only i386, x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-11-20 10:28:21 EDT --- Could someone perhaps update the status of this ticket? There's a ticket before FESCo relating to the CAcert certificates and it would be good to know where things stand today. Given that as of the last comment there were still license issues, I'm going to block FE-Legal so perhaps we can get a more formal statement of what needs to change before this can be considered acceptable for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 10:38:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Verilog-Perl Short Description: Verilog parsing routines Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-11-20 10:44:07 EDT --- Jochen, it's conditionally disabled and in fact still used on ppc. I personally don't add it to new packages, but when it's already there I'm reluctant to remove it since it still might be useful for some (powerpc). More on topic: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2009-November/msg00024.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon9 - Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-11-20 10:44:44 EDT --- According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name this should become saxon and current saxon should become saxon6 if still needed. Maybe you should contact saxon maintainer on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498604] Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498604 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(amd...@gmail.com) | --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-11-20 10:48:10 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com 2009-11-20 10:59:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libunistring Short Description: GNU Unicode string library Owners: pbrady meyering Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #9 from R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com 2009-11-20 11:31:10 EDT --- compiled on x86_64 -- thank you Comment 6, item 5 The /etc/ file mentioned /etc/otppasswd does not exist in the binary RPM Newly noticed: looks like there is a spelling or man page section error at the bottom of: ... /usr/share/man/man8/otppasswd.5.gz /usr/share/man/man8/resynctool.8.gz /var/run/otpd [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ man otpd [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ man otppasswd No manual entry for otppasswd [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ but otppasswd(5) and NOT otpasswd or otppasswd(8) appears there ... I suspect you have it mis-placed in examining the file /usr/share/man/man8/otppasswd.5.gz and that sed -e '@m...@man5@' is intended [herr...@centos-5 otpd]$ sudo rpm -Uvh /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/otpd-3.2.3-1.x86_64.rpm Password: Preparing...### [100%] 1:otpd ### [100%] [herr...@centos-5 otpd]$ rpm -qlp /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/otpd-3.2.3-1.x86_64.rpm | grep etc /etc/otpd.conf /etc/rc.d/init.d/otpd /etc/sysconfig/otpd [herr...@centos-5 otpd]$ thank you -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 11:32:19 EDT --- kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon9 - Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-11-20 11:44:09 EDT --- Good point, Alexander. Raised to fedora-devel [1], saxon's packager on Cc. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-November/msg01531.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539609] New: Review Request: gtest - Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtest - Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539609 Summary: Review Request: gtest - Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: b...@serpentine.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gtest.spec SRPM URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gtest-1.4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms (Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, Cygwin, Windows CE, and Symbian). Based on the xUnit architecture. Supports automatic test discovery, a rich set of assertions, user-defined assertions, death tests, fatal and non-fatal failures, value- and type-parameterized tests, various options for running the tests, and XML test report generation. This is needed by the Second Life viewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539606] New: Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539606 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-marc/rubygem-marc.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-marc/rubygem-marc-0.3.0-1.fc.src.rpm Description: marc is a ruby library for reading and writing MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC). More information about MARC can be found at http://www.loc.gov/marc. Koji scratch build For F-13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1819759 For F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1819760 Note that this srpm creates ruby-marc subpackage, which will replace ruby-marc rpm which is already available on Fedora: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ruby-marc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539613] New: Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539613 Summary: Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: b...@serpentine.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gmock.spec SRPM URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gtest-1.4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Inspired by jMock, EasyMock, and Hamcrest, and designed with C++'s specifics in mind, Google C++ Mocking Framework (or Google Mock for short) is a library for writing and using C++ mock classes. This library is needed for the Second Life client. It depends on gtest, for which see Bug 539609. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539613] Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539613 --- Comment #1 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2009-11-20 12:41:41 EDT --- Oops, correct URLs: Spec URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gmock.spec SRPM URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gmock-1.4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539613] Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539613 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||539609 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539609] Review Request: gtest - Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539609 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||539613 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large photo wall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Edwin ten Brink fed...@tenbrink-bekkers.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532402] Review Request: APF - Advanced Policy Firewall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532402 --- Comment #2 from Mark McKinstry mmcki...@nexcess.net 2009-11-20 14:19:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for taking the time to look at my first package. 1. The package didn't build on my system due to permissions on directories on /etc/apf Fixed. 2. rpmlint has a few messages: Fixed. 3. Your buildroot is probably fine, but Fedora does have preferences, please use a buildroot from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Fixed. 4. source0 should be URL to source file, please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL Unfortunately the author does not provide a way to download a specific version, you can only download the latest -current. I've added a note to the spec file explaining the situation. 5. Add a version to the last changelog entry Done. The updated SPEC and SRPM are at: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/apf/apf.spec http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/apf/apf-9.7.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #54 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2009-11-20 14:17:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #53) I can't get runtests.sh working... I'm not sure what you mean by runtests.sh here. When running, all tests are failing because of: ./python: error while loading shared libraries: libpython3.1.so.1.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory If this is fixed, you could add a %check section and run the tests there. I think you need to prefix the invocation of ./python with this: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. so that it can find the libpython library from the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|den...@ausil.us Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 14:50:52 EDT --- upstream sources match sha256sum symkey-1.3.0.tar.gz fedora/SOURCES/symkey-1.3.0.tar.gz 7c0dd957b4318efbd35742a026c9f42213c0ef95bcc06fece9fe0b714c1a8c0d symkey-1.3.0.tar.gz 7c0dd957b4318efbd35742a026c9f42213c0ef95bcc06fece9fe0b714c1a8c0d fedora/SOURCES/symkey-1.3.0.tar.gz rpmlint is clean spec is clear meets naming and packaging guidelines approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|den...@ausil.us Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added CC||den...@ausil.us Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 14:54:07 EDT --- srpm gives a 404 error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539693] New: Review Request: plowsahre - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plowsahre - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693 Summary: Review Request: plowsahre - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pa...@hubbitus.info QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/plowshare/plowshare.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/plowshare/plowshare-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: plowshare is a command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites. It works on UNIX-like systems and presently supports Megaupload, Rapidshare, 2Shared, 4Shared, ZShare, Badongo, DepositFiles and Mediafire. Refer to the README for more info. P.S. Spec file formatted by tabs with 5 space width. Please, do not start review if it is a problem for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com 2009-11-20 15:32:21 EDT --- fixed the urls: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-selinux/pki-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-selinux/pki-selinux-1.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989
--- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 15:37:50 EDT
---
from the java guidelines
Directory structure
All JAR files MUST go into %{_javadir}. Exceptions include JNI-using JAR files
, and application-specific JAR files (ie. JAR files that can only reasonably be
used as part of an application and therefore constitute application-private
data).
Java API documentation uses a system known as javadoc. All javadocs MUST be
installed into %{_javadocdir}.
I feel like the jars should be in %{_javadir} not %{_datadir}/java/pki/
if there is a valid reason that im missing for it to be elsewhere. either way
it should be using the correct %{_javadir} macros.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com 2009-11-20 15:41:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: symkey Short Description: The Symmetric Key Java Native Interface (JNI) package supplies various native symmetric key operations to Java programs. Owners: kwright Branches: F-10 F-11, F-12, F-13 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #16 from Andy Cress arcr...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-11-20 15:54:44 EDT --- The gzip was an artifact from older version that wasn't needed, but hadn't caused problems before. I've taken it out now, and cleaned up more stuff in the spec file. I have moved any distro-specific logic from the spec file and handled it via configure.in. Those changes are now committed to SVN, the updated spec file is at http://ipmiutil.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ipmiutil/trunk/doc/ipmiutil.spec and this will be included in ipmiutil-2.5.1 soon. I have also applied to be a Fedora packager (as user arcress). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com 2009-11-20 16:32:26 EDT --- Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com 2009-11-20 16:31:48 EDT --- changing the request for cvs branches: New Package CVS Request === Package Name: symkey Short Description: The Symmetric Key Java Native Interface (JNI) package supplies various native symmetric key operations to Java programs. Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 16:34:03 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527986] Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 --- Comment #11 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-11-20 16:35:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) I think it would be wrong to add dependencies for packages only available on rpmfusion. I'm not sure about it, but I think it would be impossible to install this package without having enabled rpmfusion. Yes, I fully agree now ;-) I think it's better to make the dependencies as good as possible. If there are any products which use this packages they should care about the required dependencies. Hm, I think I disagree with this statement. IMHO the packages in Fedora should follow these rules: - the requirements of a package should include all prerequisites which are necessary to use the package (this includes e.g. the native libraries which are used by the late binding in C#) - if a package would not be usable without another one, it must be included in the requirements - a Fedora package must be installable on a Fedora-only system Given these two rules, there would be only the one solution to exclude these bindings which need native libs from rpmfusion completely and - if needed - package them in rpmfusion. I know, this would somehow split the taoframework package - but IMHO this would be the best solution. Do you think this would be a reasonable way? Otherwise the package looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537631] Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 --- Comment #3 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-11-20 16:46:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) 3. are you planning to package the moblin web browser as well? In this case I would recommend that moblin-panel-web requires the moblin-web-browser (otherwise it just won't do anything... ;-) ) Yes, Its in progress and I believe in the mean time it will use the default browser instead so in the short term it will still be useful when used with Firefox. I've tested the package on my netbook, but unfortunately when using the URL bar nothing happens at all. I've checked netpanel/moblin-netbook-netpanel.c and it looks like that it tries to start moblin-web-browser explicitly. Do you plan to package the moblin-web-browser soon so that both packages can be tested together? ;-) 4. regarding the License I'm not sure: the sources in common/ are LGPLv2.1 but the main application seems to be GPLv2+ - I've asked on the fedora-legal mailing list for clarification... I'll clarify with upstream. I looked in common and what was in the upstream Moblin specfile. I suspect its a mix of both because of what the other moblin-panel packages use. According to the response from Tom Callaway on the fedora-legal list ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-November/msg00027.html ) you can either mention both licenses or just use GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #17 from Andy Cress arcr...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-11-20 16:46:47 EDT --- The new src.rpm is now at http://ipmiutil.sourceforge.net/FILES/ipmiutil-2.5.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 16:49:48 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538332] Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538332 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 16:54:23 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #36 from Stefan Becker stefan.bec...@nokia.com 2009-11-20 17:05:51 EDT --- FYI: the bug fix release 1.7.1 is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513775] Review Request: pyfuzzy - Python framework for fuzzy sets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513775 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-11-20 17:05:59 EDT --- Here are the updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pyfuzzy.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pyfuzzy-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1820590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 Christian Krause c...@plauener.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #11 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-11-20 17:08:50 EDT --- I've tested the newest package with the libdmapshare package from updates-testing: Please use rpmlint. ;-) It reveals not only minor problems but also major issues: 1. %doc must be inside of a %files section 2. the FAQ file should not be packaged since it doesn't contain anything 3. the package contains a library but doesn't call ldconfig http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Shared_Libraries 4. the source tarball which is available upstream is not the same as the one in the provided src.rpm: d1b81cc2a5f3d4bb76366d12914cfcc9 dmapd-0.0.15.tar.gz (upstream) dc00b094845c758a5e193e4968439de5 SOURCES/dmapd-0.0.15.tar.gz (from src.rpm) 5. dmapd can't be started: /usr/lib/dmapd/0.0.15/modules/libphoto-meta-reader-graphicsmagick.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ** ERROR **: Error opening /usr/lib/dmapd/0.0.15/modules/libphoto-meta-reader-graphicsmagick.so aborting... Aborted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:33:03 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:34:23 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:36:40 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:35:07 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:38:16 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:39:10 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:40:13 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #35 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:44:26 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539428] Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539428 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:43:01 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:43:36 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:48:44 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:45:29 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538458] Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538458 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-11-20 17:46:56 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 18:25:52 EDT --- RabbIT-4.1-9.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||4.1-9.el5 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.5-4.fc11 |1.15-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.7-4.svn2286.el5 Resolution|DUPLICATE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #87 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 18:26:47 EDT --- x11vnc-0.9.8-16.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 18:27:39 EDT --- ghmm-0.7-4.svn2286.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 18:27:07 EDT --- rubygem-trollop-1.15-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.9.8-16.el5 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 18:44:14 EDT --- dia-CMOS-0.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-CMOS-0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-20 18:44:24 EDT --- dia-CMOS-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-CMOS-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
