[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-15 08:08 EST --- Closing this Review Request... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-25 11:14 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: fuse-s3fs New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-25 12:43 EST --- The RHEL kernel has no support for FUSE as far as I can tell... so there wouldn't be any point in a EL-5 branch. Unless I am missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-25 13:12 EST --- my bad, you're right. I was messing with s3fs on a RHEL5 install, but I'd forgotten that I'd built an upstream kernel on it, along with the fuse support pacakges. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-21 15:17 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: fuse-s3fs Short Description: Fuse file system using amazon.com S3 storage service Owners: nhorman Branches: devel, F-8 InitialCC: nhorman Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-21 17:25 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 14:08 EST --- and just to be clear, if/when you green light this, I'll just fix up the spec permissions manually in cvs when I import it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 14:06 EST --- Ok, New packages available for review: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs.spec http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs-0.4-8.fc8.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 21:47 EST --- Everything looks ok from what I can see now... so this package is APPROVED. and just to be clear, if/when you green light this, I'll just fix up the spec permissions manually in cvs when I import it. Yeah, but note that cvs is bad about permissions. Once you check something in it doesn't like changing it, so you should make sure and check in the 644 one in the initial import here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:54 EST --- Kevin, any thoughts as to how we should handle the permission issue on the spec file? Shal I just not use rpmbuild -ts at the moment, or should we not worry about the permissions + file a bug against rpm-build? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 22:53 EST --- Well, I could swear I have seen this before, but now I can't find a bug or a workaround for it. ;( Perhaps post to fedora-devel? or fedora-packaging? In the mean time if you are willing to just manually check in your spec to cvs or generate a src.rpm thats got a spec with the correct perms, we shouldn't consider this a blocker. Can you spin up a version with the final fixes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-17 10:02 EST --- Ok, I've figured out the md5sum issue. The makefile that I use to generate the rpm and the release tarball had a bad dependency, and as such I was regenerating the source tarball when building the rpm. I've fixed that in my git tree. As for the spec file permission, I had noticed that too. I'm happy to change them, but I'm curious as to why its occuring in the first place. My makefile uses rpmbuild -ts on the tarball that I generated (which incudes the spec file. You'll note that the spec file in the tarball is mode 0664), but when rpmbuild -ts translates it into a src.rpm file, it adjusts the permissions to be 0600. I'm not sure why that would be, but I assumed that it was either a outdated check in rpmlint, or a bug in rpmbuild. Either way, I wasn't exactly sure what to do about it. I'd like to be able to use rpmsuild -ts to handle this, but am not sure what the proper fix is. Thoughts? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-17 12:12 EST --- 1. Cool. Thanks for tracking that down... it's important for sources to match up. 2. Yeah, I think I have seen this before, but not sure where and what causes it. ;( Whats your umask when you run the make? If you run the rpmbuild with '-vv' does it say why it's doing that? Any thoughts on items 3 and 4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-17 12:58 EST --- 1. Yeah, that will be correct on my next post of the spec/rpm file here 2. the only relevant output from rpmbuild -vv -ts tarball is: D: fini 100600 1 ( 0, 0) 2077 /home/nhorman/rpmbuild/SPECS/fuse-s3fs.spec but if I untar the file, the permissions are 664. So it seems rpmbuild is doing this, but I don't know why. 3. I didn't think I'd need it either, but Mr. Matias was correct in comment 11, building in mock does produce that error, which the BuildRequires line fixes. If its not needed in koji itself, I'll happily remove it 4. I'll update that and it will be in my next spec/rpm post (once we decide what to do about the spec file mode issue). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 11:57 EST --- Hey Neil. I would love to formally review this package... look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 12:42 EST --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Your sources don't match with upstream: d5904f2d8feae8c1e946b5cc3f4af82e fuse-s3fs-0.4.tbz2 0821843e99f686a2854b2b12b3c5b06a fuse-s3fs-0.4.tbz2.orig I am looking at the src.rpm from comment #19. Have you changed the upstream source since then without changing the release? 2. rpmlint says: fuse-s3fs.src: W: strange-permission fuse-s3fs.spec 0600 Can you make the spec mode 644 or the like? 3. Do you really need BuildRequires: python ? Nothing in the build seems to be needing python that I can see. 4. Might use '-p' with your install lines to preserve the timestamps from the upstream package on install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 07:00 EST --- For me you (fuse-s3fs) already have the green light. I am not a mentor or sponsor or something like that. I am not confident with the Please stop commenting on this bug then. While you're comments are appreciated , this bug is open specifically to request a package review for inclusion in Fedora. By actively holding a conversation on it, you may well be keeping actual reviewers from taking the time to look at it, and that will prevent the package from ever getting reviewed, and subsequently accepted. Once this package is in, I'll happily talk to you about enhancements. Until then, please let the reviewers do their job. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 07:12 EST --- Setting fedora-review flag to (none). This flag must be set by the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 15:02 EST --- (In reply to comment #23) Please stop commenting on this bug then. OK. But you add https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 in https://fedorahosted.org/s3fs/ . Note : Opened by Neil Horman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2008-02-27 12:40 EST Comment #1 From Kevin Fenzi ([EMAIL PROTECTED])on 2008-03-09 22:54 EST Comment #2 From Neil Horman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])on 2008-03-10 09:09 EST Comment #3 From Féliciano Matias ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2008-03-10 21:03 EST There was no real review during 2 weeks. Assigned to : Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) No official reviewer. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess A Reviewer is defined as the person who chooses to review a package. For the sake of clarity, one person takes ownership of the review. __Other people are encouraged to comment on the review as well, either in the bug or on the mailing list__. Once this package is in, I'll happily talk to you about enhancements. I do not request any enhancements or bug fix. Just clarification. A good documentation help reviewing a package. The /tmp issue was just playing well with other packages. Until then, please let the reviewers do their job. If you don't want me as (unofficial or official) reviewer, no problem. I don't want to be the annoying man. But please do not tell I am abusing the reviewing process or holding the conversation or something like. Best regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-13 07:54 EST --- These packages should have the same upstream release. It's an upstream issue I'm not giving upstream a release number, only a version number and the package version does currently match (I'm reuploading the same version to the release area as you have me go through all this churn). Its not the best thing to do, but I really don't want to go bumping upstream version numbers for a man page fix here and there. Suffice it to say the version numbers match correctly at the moment, and the release number is irrelevant to upstream. As for the tmp file changes, fine. New packages attached http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs.spec http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs-0.4-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-13 18:05 EST --- (In reply to comment #19) Its not the best thing to do, but I really don't want to go bumping upstream version numbers You are the boss, you are the developer and I really appreciate you work. You have the last word. But I am not requesting for bumping upstream version numbers, but the respect of a convention that, AFAIK everybody respect. I really don't want to go bumping upstream version numbers for a man page fix here and there. I understand. But does it matter if fuse-s3fs-0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm through fuse-s3fs-0.4-6.fc8.src.rpm was fuse-s3fs-0.4.1-1.fc8.src.rpm and fuse-s3fs-0.4.6-1.fc8.src.rpm ? Is it matter if I have : $ rpm -q -l -p fuse-s3fs-0.4-4.fc8.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.4-6.fc8.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.4.tbz2 fuse-s3fs.spec fuse-s3fs-0.4.tbz2 # wrong fuse-s3fs.spec Or : $ rpm -q -l -p fuse-s3fs-0.4-4.fc8.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.4-6.fc8.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.4.tbz2 patch-cvs-20080310.diff fuse-s3fs.spec fuse-s3fs-0.4.tbz2 patch-cvs-20080313.diff fuse-s3fs.spec Or : $ rpm -q -l -p fuse-s3fs-0.5.cvs20080310-0.fc8.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.5.cvs20080313-0.fc8-0.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.5.cvs20080310.tbz2 fuse-s3fs.spec fuse-s3fs-0.5.cvs20080313.tbz2 fuse-s3fs.spec I don't know exactly how to deal with this. But I am quite sure some packagers guru have the right answer. Also, I am not sure koji can handle soft tagged version. I suppose koji have some cache system. version numbers for a man page If you release fuse-s3fs 0.4.1, 0.4.2, etc, use this man page cover version 0.4.x (or just 0.4). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-13 18:59 EST --- Perhaps we're misunderstanding each other here. Its my understanding that the version number in the rpm should match the upstream source of the same version number (whats pointed to by the Source0: tag in my spec file). On that I think we both agree. Please correct me if I'm wrong What you've noticed is that I've posted several rpms to this bug, all of which have the same version number, different revision numbers but contain the same file set (i.e. no patches against the new revisions). The implication that you're concerned with here, if I'm understanding your concern, is that clearly I've then modified the pristine source tarball that I'm pointing at. And thats badness. Nominally thats just not something that should be done. I've been making the changes in my upstream git tree in parallel, updating the tarball on fedorahosted, and rebuilding the pakage with the same version. The only reason that I'm doing it now is that you're having me make minor cleanups to this package in preparation for release to Fedora, and I'd really like to have the first release of the package be identical to the first release of the tarball on the hosted site (silly I know, its just an OCD idosyncracy of mine). Its really just for convienience right now while you're reviewing this package. Once you give it the green light, I'll certainly not make changes to the 0.4 revision upstream. That tag will stay fixed, and I'll bump the version number. Does that adequately describe and satisfy your concerns? Thanks for all your dilligent work on this review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-13 21:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #21) The only reason that I'm doing it now is that you're having me make minor cleanups to this package in preparation for release to Fedora That's fine. Does that adequately describe and satisfy your concerns? Fully. Once you give it the green light For me you (fuse-s3fs) already have the green light. I am not a mentor or sponsor or something like that. I am not confident with the Fedora project in making approval package. If you need someone to approuve your package and if it can please you that I endorse this role, tell me and point me to some documentations to get the process go ahead. But be aware I am not a GNU/Linux developer. Just an enthusiastic and happy Fedora's user. Currently I am mostly programming for Windows :-( Let me strongly suggest you to have a x.y.z pattern for the version number. For the current fuse-s3fs this means fuse-s3fs-0.4.0-1.f8.noarch.rpm (and fuse-s3fs-0.4.0.tar.gz for the upstream package). Keep the version 0.4 in the documentation. So you can update the upstream version (for minor bugs, etc which will take place in 0.4.x) without touching the documentation. This just costs 2 chars .0. With x.y.z version number you can have : - x : minor improvement, bug fix, ... - y : major evolution, command line option change, ... - z : format change, migration path needed. I just check fuse-s3fs-0.4-6. - default=$HOME/.fuse-s3fs-cache/ Perhaps not a gread idea :-) New proposal : - default system config : /etc/fuse-s3fs - default system cache : /etc/fuse-s3fs/cache (will be a symlink to /var/cache/fuse-s3fs) - default user config : $HOME/.fuse-s3fs - default user cache : $HOME/.fuse-s3fs/cache NB: default system cache is only for the root user (typically for mount at boot time). This permit in futur release to have a defaut config file : $HOME/.fuse-s3fs/config . Or a file for secret access key : $HOME/.fuse-s3fs/secret (mode 0700 only) . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-12 07:44 EST --- Ok, fair points. I've updated the spec file to include a big warning in the description about data integrity I've updated the man page: * to include defaults for all mount options * to reconcile the drive/bucket naming consistency * to include a section on compatibility with other s3fs implementations and access methods. New packages: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs.spec http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs-0.4-5.fc8.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3
storage service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-12 22:04 EST ---
Some thoughts.
Version convention.
http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs-0.4-2.fc8.src.rpm
...
http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs-0.4-5.fc8.src.rpm
These packages should have the same upstream release. It's an upstream issue.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines
You can request advices here :
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
By default fuse-s3fs use /tmp/{bucket} for its cache. It's annoying i think.
And from the man page :
- preserve_cache=[no|yes]
If set to yes, the cache for the given mount will not be deleted on unmount,
saving the need for downloads on a subsequent remount (default: no)
But Fedora (like many Unix system) use tmpwatch :
- The tmpwatch utility recursively searches through specified
directories and removes files which have not been accessed in a
specified period of time. Tmpwatch is normally used to clean up
directories which are used for temporarily holding files (for example,
/tmp).
From the FHS (Filesystem Hierarchy Standard) it seems /var/cache is suitable
for
your need for the root account :
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#VARCACHEAPPLICATIONCACHEDATA
Root (system wide mount) : /var/cache/fuse-s3fs-cache/{bucket}
Users : $HOME/.fuse-s3fs-cache/{bucket} (like firefox do).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 04:04 EST --- It's Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3). http://aws.amazon.com/s3 fuse-as3fs ? http://aws.amazon.com/ (Amazon Web Services) fuse-awss3fs ? the project on fedora hosted. It's the latest project. To be honest I don't really care. Your (a|aws|any way)s3fs seems very promising and packaging it is really helpful. Many thanks. But I think https://fedorahosted.org/s3fs/ should at least mention that s3fs is used by other similar projets. Some feedback : With the -C flag ? s3fs -c|-r|-d|-f require one argument (the bucket). s3fs bucket mountpoint requires two arguments (btw, does not work, only s3fs -o bucket=xxx mountpoint works). Proposition : s3fs -h # help s3fs -c|-d|-r|-f bucket s3fs -m bucket mountpoint # '-m' optional ? s3fs -u mountpoint # umount (or the documentation should point to fusermount -u) Options : [-o AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=xxx,AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=xxx] Or -a xxx (access key) -s xxx (secret key) Environment variables are fine also and convenient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 07:19 EST --- But I think https://fedorahosted.org/s3fs/ should at least mention that s3fs is used by other similar projets Thats an excellent suggestion. I've updated the fedora hosted site to clarify the naming contention. In that effort I went looking, and as it turns out there are at least 2 more projects (hosted on sourceforge) that make use of some variant of this name :). At any rate, I've added a paragraph to the hosted site to make a point of relating this package to the hosted project. Regarding your suggestions, you're right the man page is well out of date. I'll update and repost the package soon. thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 07:48 EST --- New package available: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs.spec http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs-0.4-3.fc8.src.rpm Thanks Regards! Neil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 13:17 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs.spec The line mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/man/man8 is useless. I build the package in mock (--root=fedora-8-x86_64) and result/build.log show : /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found BuildRequires: python fixe this. In this case Requires: python is useless. I get for rpm -q --requires -p fuse-s3fs-0.4-3.fc8.mat.2.noarch.rpm (my package) : /usr/bin/python fuse-python python-boto rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 14:23 EST --- fuse-s3fs-0.4.3 provides the option -p pubkey. AFAIK it's not a public key (like pgp/x.509 public key). Same apply to the man page. Amazon use Access Key and Secret Access Key. Amazon keep the Secret Access Key. This is like login/password. In contrast, for X.509 certificate (used by ec2), Amazon use Public Key and Private Key. Amazon do not keep the Private Key. Perhaps I am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 14:36 EST --- Spec file updated with corrections from comment 11 As for the public/private key thing. Its meant to look like a public/private key setup, I think , but you are correct, in reality they're not that. I've corrected the package to be more consistent in the naming New packages, built successfully in koji available for reivew: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs.spec http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs-0.4-4.fc8.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 16:48 EST --- Some random comments (details). fuse-s3fs (could) do with real user data. I think the description of fuse-s3fs (rpm and/or man page) should have a BIG warning until fuse-s3fs get stabilised. From the man page : - s3fs will mount an amazon s3 bucket (that has been properly formatted) - -f bucket Format an s3 bucket to make it suitable for mounting - Directory information is stored in the filesystem metadata that is retrieved during the mount operation from a file called fsdata. This file is a python class that has been pickled, and maintains all the directory heirarchy. What is this format ? The same as s3fs from google code ? Is it a standard from Amazon ? Is it a fuse-s3fs (Fedora) specific format ? Is it compatible with other tools (like s3fox) or should I only use fuse-s3fs ? It's not clear and it's an important topic. From de man page : - -f bucket Format an s3 bucket to make it suitable for mounting Format and so destroy all previous data ? The man page does not give the default values. The man page use drive instead of bucket in some places. Many thanks for this great tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 22:40 EST --- rpm and/or man page) should have a BIG warning until fuse-s3fs get stabilised I actually had a warning on the project page and removed it as I am reasonably confident in its stability. I do however take your point since its not seen widespread use. I'll add a warning to the rpm description. ...What is this format ? It is precisely what I indicated it was. All the metadata for the fs is stored in a python class that is pickled. If you want to see what the data structure looks like, all you need to do is look at the s3fs code. Trying to describe it in words I don't think would serve any additional purpose. If you need specifics, you can look at the S3DriveMetaData class. thats the one that gets pickled. This is of course not compatible with most other tools. However, metadata aside, the files themselves that you store in s3fs are stored directly as individual files (stored as their fully qualified path names). As such, even if the metadata gets corrupted (or reformatted), the files are still present on S3. While they won't be seen from an s3fs mount, they can still be retrieved via a web interface (like www.s3browse.com). From de man page : - -f bucket Format an s3 bucket to make it suitable for mounting Format and so destroy all previous data ? no acutally (as per my previous paragraph) The man page does not give the default values for the mount options? I can add that. I'll also reconcile the drive/bucket discrepancy, as they are, as you have likely guessed, synonomous. I have a class to teach tomorrow, but I'll try to get to these and repost in the afternoon. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-12 01:07 EST --- Thanks for the reply (and sorry for my poor english). It is precisely what I indicated it was. All the metadata for the fs is stored in a python class that is pickled. If you want to see what the data structure looks like, all you need to do is look at the s3fs code. For me it's also obvious. My point of view was the average joe. For exemple the underlying FS of fuse-smb is smb. fuse-smb is compatible with any smb implementation, can use any smb implementation. Fuse-smb is a client of an smb server (which is a file system). For fuse-sshfs, it's ssh/scp. These fuse file systems export _already existing_ file systems. Fuse-s3fs does not have any underlying FS. S3 is not a file system. Unlike smb or ssh, (fuse-)s3fs is not a standard. fuse-s3fs define an entirely new file system (like s3fs form google code do, etc). It's clear for advanced users, I think it's less obvious for the average joe. I think we should point this somewhere in the documentation. That is, fuse-s3fs form Fedora is not compatible with s3fs from goole and so on. It's an important point for the average joe. He should not think great I can use my S3 storage with linux (fuse-s3fs) and with Windows (win-s3fs or like). for the mount options? Yes. The whole propose of this bug report is the approval of fuse-s3fs to Fedora. For me fuse-s3fs is fine for Fedora. Sure, it should have bugs and miss features (it does not support S3 Europe :-)). But the goal of Fedora is the rapid progress of Free, Open Source software and content and share innovations (even if it's risky) with the broad Fedora community. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: s3fs - Fuse |Review Request: fuse-s3fs - |filesystem for amazon.com's |Fuse filesystem for |S3 storage service |amazon.com's S3 storage ||service --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-10 22:44 EST --- New spec/rpm http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs.spec http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs-0.4-2.fc8.src.rpm I've renamed the package to fuse-s3fs and removed the mount.s3fs binary. as for the google code reference, yes, I found that after I created the project on fedora hosted. I'd really rather not give up the name, given that the google code project isn't packaged and its particularly descriptive. It looks like there are actually multiple google code projects for s3fs. One (s3fs-fuse) is a python implementation that hasn't been touched in over a year. The other, s3fs, is a c++ implementation that has only seen recent activity (much like my project). As there are actively multiple project competing for the name, I'd prefer not to give up my claim on it. Neither of the other projects have been packaged, or are looking to be packaged for Fedora or any other distro (at least not publically that I can find). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
