[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-10 04:12 EST --- Nicolas, ok I sent a mail to fedora-fonts-list proposing your idea of renaming fonts deviating from *-fonts. Sorry, Dennis, starting this discussion here, and thanks for your patience. So I agree let's proceed with un-core-fonts-1.0.2. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-10 10:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #26) > Nicolas, ok I sent a mail to fedora-fonts-list proposing your idea of renaming > fonts deviating from > *-fonts. > Sorry, Dennis, starting this discussion here, and thanks for your patience. > So I agree let's proceed with un-core-fonts-1.0.2. :) thanks Jens ^^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: un-fonts- |Review Request: un-fonts- |core - Korean TrueType fonts|core - Korean TrueType fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||453017 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-27 03:46 EST ---
rpmlint says:
un-fonts-core.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.2-080608-1
1.0-1.fc9
How about using the latest released 1.0.2-080608 tarball?
(Also since you note it in the changelog.:)
I think the version can be just 1.0.2 and then the datestamp can go into the
release
field following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines.
Probably
%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}
%define archivename un-fonts
Name: un-fonts-core
would be ok for this package.
un-fonts-core.src: W: invalid-license GPL v2
The license url http://korea.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.ko.html embedded in the ttf
fonts
is broken. Could you please contact upstream to clarify their intention on the
GPL
version. It would be better if the fonts files just stated the GPL version
(eg "version 2 or later") than referring to a url which might change or
disappear.
Anyway currently the License tag should be GPLv2+ or maybe GPLv2.
(There seems to be a translation at
http://korea.gnu.org/documents/copyleft/gpl.ko.html
but again Fedora, like the FSF, would not recognise the unofficial translation.
So it
does not really help.)
You don't use xorg-x11-font-utils or ttmkfdir so those buildrequires can be
dropped.
It would be good to have a bit more information in the description.
There can also be summary and description in Korean added.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-28 07:19 EST --- Summary: Un series Korean TrueType fonts Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-core.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-core-1.0.2.080608-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a set of Korean TrueType fonts. Un-fonts is comes from the HLaTeX as type1 fonts in 1998 by Koaunghi Un It converted to TrueType with the FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. This package has only the most common font families. Install un-fonts-extra for additional fonts. #1 Rebuild and repackaging for rpmlint #2 Changed package name to Un series Korean TrueType fonts #3 Summary and description of the changes, added to Korean #4 Added %define archiveversion 080608, because 080608 is snapshot version #5 I have a problem in korean spacing words for rpmlint. I don't fix it #6 fixed License: GPLv2+ -- Problem #5 # rpmlint -i un-fonts-core.spec un-fonts-core.spec:25: W: non-break-space line 25 The spec file contains a non-break space, which looks like a regular space in some editors but can lead to obscure errors. It should be replaced by a regular space. un-fonts-core.spec:27: W: non-break-space line 27 The spec file contains a non-break space, which looks like a regular space in some editors but can lead to obscure errors. It should be replaced by a regular space. un-fonts-core.spec:28: W: non-break-space line 28 The spec file contains a non-break space, which looks like a regular space in some editors but can lead to obscure errors. It should be replaced by a regular space. 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 03:08 EST --- Thanks, Dennis for the clear update. > #1 Rebuild and repackaging for rpmlint > #2 Changed package name to Un series Korean TrueType fonts > #3 Summary and description of the changes, added to Korean Thanks > #4 Added %define archiveversion 080608, because 080608 is snapshot version OK - I am still a little unclear on the meaning of the snapshot date in relation to the version 1.0.2. Does it mean prerelease or postrelease or is it just a label? In any case I don't think it should go into the version field but the release: > #5 I have a problem in korean spacing words for rpmlint. I don't fix it Okay - maybe we should file a bug for rpmlint for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 03:19 EST --- Created an attachment (id=310643) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=310643&action=view) un-fonts-core.spec-1.patch some suggested changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 03:18 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > #6 fixed License: GPLv2+ Did you check upstream about the GPL version and ask if they will update the license text in the fonts themselves? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 03:16 EST --- BTW just a note that if upstream released the fontforge .sfd files it would be better to build those than shipping the .ttf files but that is not blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 03:26 EST --- Also please update the changelog in the spec file next time you update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 03:32 EST --- One more thing: since the fonts are big and probably most non-Korean users won't need all of them installed I would like to subpackage the less used fonts so that we can install just main ones by default and the rest for Korean users. Default font for Korean should be Batang? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 03:46 EST --- > Default font for Korean should be Batang? I tested now - well I guess the default Un Dotum should be ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 06:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Default font for Korean should be Batang? > I tested now - well I guess the default Un Dotum should be ok? Debin and ubuntu at default korean font is Un Dotum ^^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 06:19 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #2) > > #6 fixed License: GPLv2+ > Did you check upstream about the GPL version and ask if they will update the license > text in the fonts themselves? I asked them to check again. They gave answers to a GPLv2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-02 05:45 EST --- > I asked them to check again. They gave answers to a GPLv2 Thanks. So not GPLv2+ (ie "version 2 or later")? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 01:35 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > > #4 Added %define archiveversion 080608, because 080608 is snapshot version > OK - I am still a little unclear on the meaning of the snapshot date in relation to > the version 1.0.2. Does it mean prerelease or postrelease or is it just a label? > In any case I don't think it should go into the version field but the release: this version is prerelease and 1.0 is stable release how about you packaging version is 1.0 or 1.0.2-prerelease? I think a 1.0.2-stable release will take a long time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 02:05 EST --- Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-core.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-core-1.0.2-2.080608.fc9.src.rpm diff URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-core.spec-2.patch - refined .spec literal, license, versioning contents. #1 Changes to licenes GPLv2+ to GPLv2. #2 Changes to versioning 1.0.2.080608-2 to 1.0.2-2.080608 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 00:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Default font for Korean should be Batang? > > I tested now - well I guess the default Un Dotum should be ok? Default font is UnDotum in fontconfig-2.6.0-2.fc10< http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=51207 >. See Also : http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13569 : Korean font in the default config - replacing baekmuk with un -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 03:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) > Thanks. So not GPLv2+ (ie "version 2 or later")? About the license please see also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UN_fonts#Caveats -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 03:53 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) > this version is prerelease and 1.0 is stable release > how about you packaging version is 1.0 or 1.0.2-prerelease? > > I think a 1.0.2-stable release will take a long time Oh I see. So I had misunderstood the upstream versioning intention. Then I am sorry but better we revert to 1.0 unless there are strong reasons for shipping a snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 04:04 EST --- Created an attachment (id=311012) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=311012&action=view) un-fonts-core.spec-3.patch simple patch just to revert to the stable release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 06:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #16) > About the license please see also > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UN_fonts#Caveats Yes, please update the wiki page (change its status) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UN_fonts and follow our fonts packaging instructions http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fonts_packaging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 17:40 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > Then I am sorry but better we revert to 1.0 unless there are > strong reasons for shipping a snapshot. There are 4 more MiBs of content with 4 years of work since 1.0. Is that strong enough? However the package should use pre-release conventions http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:31 EST --- Summary: Un Core families Korean TrueType fonts Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/1.0/un-core-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/1.0/un-core-fonts-1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a set of Korean TrueType fonts. Un-fonts come from the HLaTeX type1 fonts made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. Core families (9 fonts) * UnBatang, UnBatangBold: serif * UnDotum, UnDotumBold: sans-serif * UnGraphic, UnGraphicBold: sans-serif style * UnPilgi, UnPilgiBold: script * UnGungseo: cursive, brush-stroke Install un-extra-fonts for additional fonts. and 1.0.2-pre repackaging http://get9.net/rpm/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.3.080608.fc9.src.rpm http://get9.net/rpm/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #13) > > this version is prerelease and 1.0 is stable release > > how about you packaging version is 1.0 or 1.0.2-prerelease? > > > > I think a 1.0.2-stable release will take a long time > Oh I see. So I had misunderstood the upstream versioning intention. > Then I am sorry but better we revert to 1.0 unless there are > strong reasons for shipping a snapshot. revert to the 1.0 stable release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 21:08 EST --- Stable release 1.0-4 Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0/un-core-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0/un-core-fonts-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm Diff URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0/un-core-fonts-1.0.spec-4.patch pre-release 1.0.2-0.4.080608 Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts-1.0.2- 0.4.080608.fc9.src.rpm Diff URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts-1.0.2.spec-4.patch -Refined .spec literal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 01:06 EST --- > There are 4 more MiBs of content with 4 years of work since 1.0. Is that strong enough? Ok, agreed let's go with the new pre-release if Dennis does not have any concerns. :) (Sorry to keep jumping back and forth with the version) Personally I would rather keep the upstream name un-fonts-core. We do that with other fonts packages too. IMHO upstream naming should take precedence AFAP. Nicolas, how can we get consensus on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 04:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #24) > Personally I would rather keep the upstream name un-fonts-core. > We do that with other fonts packages too. My preference would be un-core-fonts/un-extra-fonts to minimize confusion with subpackages. Multiple slightly different conventions are user-unfriendly. But I'll let you have the last call on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
