[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 Steven M. Parrish changed: What|Removed |Added CC||smparr...@gmail.com --- Comment #23 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-06-10 07:29:31 EDT --- Thanks for the report. New builds have been submitted. If you have any other issues please open a new report. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333
Martin Dengler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@martindengler.com
--- Comment #22 from Martin Dengler 2009-06-09
20:50:38 EDT ---
The rpm is broken as it is currently in rawhide (code fails to import
bitfrost). The specfile doesn't look correct to me. It shouldn't be deleting
part of the code it's meant to install. This patch fixes it for me:
---
sugar-update-control.spec |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sugar-update-control.spec b/sugar-update-control.spec
index d5e16aa..09eda58 100644
--- a/sugar-update-control.spec
+++ b/sugar-update-control.spec
@@ -33,8 +33,6 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{__python} setup.py install --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-# avoid conflicts with standard __init__.py*
-rm
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/{bitfrost,bitfrost/update,bitfrost/util}/__init__.py*
%find_lang %{name}
%clean
--
1.6.0.6
~
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 --- Comment #21 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-03-12 01:24:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Why is this being pushed to F-10, when it's > Requires: sugar >= 0.83 > can't be satisfied? (F-10 currently has sugar-0.82.9-4.fc10) sugar-update-control should also work with sugar-0.82. I would recommend pushing all of 0.84 to F10 though. You don't normally do major upgrades on a stable release, but I would be surprised if there were actual users depending on 0.82.x on Fedora 10, because for a number of reasons this release wasn't really usable on anything but the XO, and not very usable there either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 --- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter 2009-03-11 14:46:38 EDT --- We had talked about the "sugar >= 0.83 and F-10" issue in irc, but I hadn't documented it here in the review (part of the reason why the review lacked "testing it out") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 --- Comment #19 from Rex Dieter 2009-03-11 14:44:43 EDT --- Why is this being pushed to F-10, when it's Requires: sugar >= 0.83 can't be satisfied? (F-10 currently has sugar-0.82.9-4.fc10) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-11 13:56:39 EDT --- sugar-update-control-0.20-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.20-4.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||462625(FedoraOLPCDelta) Depends on|462625(FedoraOLPCDelta) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-08 10:14:03 EDT --- sugar-update-control-0.20-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-update-control-0.20-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 --- Comment #16 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-03-07 21:58:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Its done and successfully built for rawhide. I think we should build also on F10, and push it to bodhi as a new package. > Would be glad to help comaintain > the upstream as well. You can also go here > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/sugar-update-control and > request comaintain on the feodra package and I will approve it. Thanks, done. Please, signup on gitorious, and I will add you as a committer to the sugar-update-control project: http://git.sugarlabs.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 --- Comment #15 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-03-07 19:49:37 EDT --- Its done and successfully built for rawhide. Would be glad to help comaintain the upstream as well. You can also go here https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/sugar-update-control and request comaintain on the feodra package and I will approve it. Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review |Review Request: |Request:sugar-update-contro |sugar-update-control - |l - Activity update control |Activity update control |panel for Sugar |panel for Sugar Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-07 19:14:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
